首页 > 最新文献

Church Life最新文献

英文 中文
Life After Bunyan 班扬之后的生活
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0010
Michael Davies
This chapter explores the ‘church life’ of the Congregational meeting at Bedford during the two decades following the death in 1688 of its most famous pastor, John Bunyan, and the passing of the 1689 Toleration Act. It examines the difficult experience of pastoral transition facing the church under the early leadership of Bunyan’s successor, Ebenezer Chandler: the first pastor to be appointed from without the congregation since its establishment in the early 1650s, but about whom almost nothing has been written. This chapter addresses matters at the heart of the relationship between Dissenting pastors and their congregations in one of the most prominent and well-documented Congregational churches of the era, and during a key period in the transformation of English Dissent: from the seventeenth century to the eighteenth century, and from persecution to toleration, via the short-lived ‘Happy Union’ of Presbyterians and Congregationalists in the early 1690s.
本章探讨了1688年最著名的牧师约翰·班扬(John Bunyan)去世和1689年《宽容法案》(tolerance Act)通过后的二十年里,贝德福德公理会会议的“教会生活”。它考察了班扬的继任者埃比尼泽·钱德勒(Ebenezer Chandler)早期领导下教会面临的牧灵过渡的艰难经历:自1650年代初教会成立以来,埃比尼泽·钱德勒是第一位由非教会任命的牧师,但关于他几乎没有任何记载。这一章讨论的是当时最著名的公理会教会中持不同政见者牧师和会众之间关系的核心问题,也是英国不同政见者转变的关键时期:从17世纪到18世纪,从迫害到宽容,通过1690年代早期长老会和公理会短暂的“幸福联盟”。
{"title":"Life After Bunyan","authors":"Michael Davies","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the ‘church life’ of the Congregational meeting at Bedford during the two decades following the death in 1688 of its most famous pastor, John Bunyan, and the passing of the 1689 Toleration Act. It examines the difficult experience of pastoral transition facing the church under the early leadership of Bunyan’s successor, Ebenezer Chandler: the first pastor to be appointed from without the congregation since its establishment in the early 1650s, but about whom almost nothing has been written. This chapter addresses matters at the heart of the relationship between Dissenting pastors and their congregations in one of the most prominent and well-documented Congregational churches of the era, and during a key period in the transformation of English Dissent: from the seventeenth century to the eighteenth century, and from persecution to toleration, via the short-lived ‘Happy Union’ of Presbyterians and Congregationalists in the early 1690s.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117103829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Godly Order and the Trumpet of Defiance 神圣秩序和反抗号角
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0002
Joel Halcomb
This chapter explores the politics of church life among Congregational gathered churches during the English Revolution. In contrast to studies that view gathered church life at this time as too fluid and unsettled to be meaningfully analysed, it outlines the social relations and ecclesiastical structures that shaped the ‘mixed’ church polity of Congregational churches, arguing that these structures defined the corporate and personal experience of their members. In a close analysis of the transactional debate and conflict apparent in two case studies, focusing on the politics of Congregational church life at Norwich and Bury St. Edmunds in the 1640s and 1650s, it concludes that these politics were formative and creative. They determined a church’s beliefs, practices, identity, and communal life in a process best understood as denominational formation. This chapter therefore provides a method for studying religious experience within other institutional churches established both in this period and more generally.
这一章探讨了英国革命期间公理会聚集教会的教会生活政治。与那些认为当时聚集的教会生活过于流动和不稳定而无法进行有意义的分析的研究相反,它概述了形成公理会教会“混合”教会政体的社会关系和教会结构,认为这些结构定义了其成员的团体和个人经历。在对两个案例研究中显而易见的交易性辩论和冲突的仔细分析中,重点关注1640年代和1650年代诺维奇和伯里圣埃德蒙兹的教会生活的政治,得出结论,这些政治是形成性的和创造性的。他们决定了一个教会的信仰、实践、身份和公共生活,这一过程最好被理解为教派的形成。因此,本章提供了一种方法来研究在这一时期和更普遍的其他机构教会中建立的宗教经验。
{"title":"Godly Order and the Trumpet of Defiance","authors":"Joel Halcomb","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the politics of church life among Congregational gathered churches during the English Revolution. In contrast to studies that view gathered church life at this time as too fluid and unsettled to be meaningfully analysed, it outlines the social relations and ecclesiastical structures that shaped the ‘mixed’ church polity of Congregational churches, arguing that these structures defined the corporate and personal experience of their members. In a close analysis of the transactional debate and conflict apparent in two case studies, focusing on the politics of Congregational church life at Norwich and Bury St. Edmunds in the 1640s and 1650s, it concludes that these politics were formative and creative. They determined a church’s beliefs, practices, identity, and communal life in a process best understood as denominational formation. This chapter therefore provides a method for studying religious experience within other institutional churches established both in this period and more generally.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114675558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Reformed Pastor as Nonconformist 改革宗牧师是不墨守成规的人
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0008
N. Keeble
This chapter examines the complexities and tensions of Richard Baxter’s pastoral and ecclesiastical thought and practice after 1662 when, an unwilling Nonconformist, he continued to work for a less prescriptive and more inclusive national episcopal church that might accommodate the greater part of Nonconformist opinion. While he could not be a member of a church re-established by the Act of Uniformity on exclusive lines, no more would he separate from it or promote a permanent schism in the religious life of the nation by ministering to a separatist gathered church. This non-partisan Baxterian middle way, or ‘mere Christianity’, and particularly his practice of occasional communion with parish churches, was attacked by both Nonconformists and conformists, but Baxter’s commitment to church unity never wavered. For the last thirty years of his life, only through writing could the author of the classic The Reformed Pastor (1656) exercise his pastoral vocation.
本章考察了理查德·巴克斯特在1662年之后的牧灵和教会思想和实践的复杂性和张力,当时,他不愿意成为非国教教徒,他继续为一个不那么规范、更包容的国家圣公会工作,这可能会容纳大部分非国教教徒的意见。虽然他不能成为《统一法案》重新建立的教会的一员,但他也不能脱离它,也不能通过为一个分裂的聚集教会服务来促进国家宗教生活的永久分裂。这种无党派的巴克斯特中间道路,或“纯粹的基督教”,尤其是他偶尔与教区教堂交流的做法,受到了非国教教徒和国教教徒的攻击,但巴克斯特对教会团结的承诺从未动摇。在他生命的最后三十年里,只有通过写作,这位经典著作《改革宗牧师》(1656)的作者才能行使他的牧灵使命。
{"title":"The Reformed Pastor as Nonconformist","authors":"N. Keeble","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the complexities and tensions of Richard Baxter’s pastoral and ecclesiastical thought and practice after 1662 when, an unwilling Nonconformist, he continued to work for a less prescriptive and more inclusive national episcopal church that might accommodate the greater part of Nonconformist opinion. While he could not be a member of a church re-established by the Act of Uniformity on exclusive lines, no more would he separate from it or promote a permanent schism in the religious life of the nation by ministering to a separatist gathered church. This non-partisan Baxterian middle way, or ‘mere Christianity’, and particularly his practice of occasional communion with parish churches, was attacked by both Nonconformists and conformists, but Baxter’s commitment to church unity never wavered. For the last thirty years of his life, only through writing could the author of the classic The Reformed Pastor (1656) exercise his pastoral vocation.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134291758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
‘Letting a Room in London-House’ “在伦敦出租房间”
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0004
Kathleen Lynch
This chapter considers Reasons Humbly Offered in Justification [ … ] of Letting a Room in London-House unto Certain Peaceable Christians, Called Anabaptists (?1647). Written by a Presbyterian elder, possibly Richard Coysh, this anonymous tract defends the decision to rent a room in the Bishop of London’s palace to Baptists led by Henry Jessey and William Kiffin. It signals a key moment in the formation of religious identities and allegiances during the English Revolution, when the disestablishment of the Church of England made available ‘waste’ rooms for Dissenters to occupy, even within the grounds of St. Paul’s Cathedral. This chapter brings into focus some unexpected causes and consequences for religious toleration in seventeenth-century London, and considers afresh the jurisdictions and protective authorities as well as the architectural forms and features of an urban landscape that affected Dissenting ‘church life’ and its accommodation in a time of ecclesiastical renewal, contest, experimentation, and opportunism.
本章探讨了在伦敦住宅中向某些被称为再洗礼派的和平基督徒出租一间房子的理由(?1647)。这封匿名信的作者是一位长老会长老,可能是理查德·科伊什。这封匿名信为把伦敦主教宫的一个房间租给亨利·杰西和威廉·基芬领导的浸信会教徒的决定进行了辩护。它标志着英国革命期间宗教身份和忠诚形成的关键时刻,当时英国国教的解体为持不同政见者提供了“废弃”房间,甚至在圣保罗大教堂的场地内。本章重点介绍了17世纪伦敦宗教宽容的一些意想不到的原因和后果,并重新考虑了司法管辖区和保护当局,以及城市景观的建筑形式和特征,这些都影响了不同教派的“教会生活”及其在教会更新,竞争,实验和机会主义时期的适应。
{"title":"‘Letting a Room in London-House’","authors":"Kathleen Lynch","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers Reasons Humbly Offered in Justification [ … ] of Letting a Room in London-House unto Certain Peaceable Christians, Called Anabaptists (?1647). Written by a Presbyterian elder, possibly Richard Coysh, this anonymous tract defends the decision to rent a room in the Bishop of London’s palace to Baptists led by Henry Jessey and William Kiffin. It signals a key moment in the formation of religious identities and allegiances during the English Revolution, when the disestablishment of the Church of England made available ‘waste’ rooms for Dissenters to occupy, even within the grounds of St. Paul’s Cathedral. This chapter brings into focus some unexpected causes and consequences for religious toleration in seventeenth-century London, and considers afresh the jurisdictions and protective authorities as well as the architectural forms and features of an urban landscape that affected Dissenting ‘church life’ and its accommodation in a time of ecclesiastical renewal, contest, experimentation, and opportunism.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130500087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Experience of Dissent 不同意见的经历
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0007
C. Gribben
This chapter examines developments in John Owen’s thinking about church government, church membership, and the observation of the sacraments. It will outline his experiments in ecclesiology in the 1640s, when the Independent party emerged as a movement for reform within the national church. It will suggest reasons for his apparent lack of interest in ecclesiology in the 1650s: a period in which his principal writings make little reference to the benefits of church membership, and in which Owen’s own ecclesiastical affiliation cannot be traced. It will discuss the renewal of his interest in church life in the 1660s and beyond, particularly as his Restoration works on the principles of public worship, together with a very complete set of auditor’s notes covering almost twenty years of his preaching, offer new ways of understanding the challenge he faced in turning local church principles into local church practice.
本章考察约翰·欧文关于教会管理、教会成员和遵守圣礼的思想的发展。它将概述他在17世纪40年代在教会学方面的实验,当时独立党作为国家教会内部的改革运动出现。它将揭示他在17世纪50年代对教会学明显缺乏兴趣的原因:在那个时期,他的主要著作几乎没有提到教会成员的好处,在那个时期,欧文自己的教会信仰无法追溯到。它将讨论他在1660年代及以后对教会生活的兴趣,特别是他的复辟作品,关于公众崇拜的原则,以及一套非常完整的审计笔记,涵盖了他近二十年的讲道,提供了新的方式来理解他所面临的挑战将地方教会原则转化为地方教会实践。
{"title":"The Experience of Dissent","authors":"C. Gribben","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines developments in John Owen’s thinking about church government, church membership, and the observation of the sacraments. It will outline his experiments in ecclesiology in the 1640s, when the Independent party emerged as a movement for reform within the national church. It will suggest reasons for his apparent lack of interest in ecclesiology in the 1650s: a period in which his principal writings make little reference to the benefits of church membership, and in which Owen’s own ecclesiastical affiliation cannot be traced. It will discuss the renewal of his interest in church life in the 1660s and beyond, particularly as his Restoration works on the principles of public worship, together with a very complete set of auditor’s notes covering almost twenty years of his preaching, offer new ways of understanding the challenge he faced in turning local church principles into local church practice.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129891735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Godly Pastors and their Congregations in Mid-Seventeenth-Century London 17世纪中期伦敦的敬虔牧师及其会众
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0003
E. Vernon
This chapter examines the relationship between pastor and congregation in the London parishes during the Interregnum. It addresses how godly ministers, called on by Parliament at the outbreak of the Civil War to reform parochial discipline and prevent the ‘promiscuous multitude’ from polluting the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper in England’s parish churches, negotiated issues of authority, changes to worship and liturgy, and the already contentious issues of patronage and finance. These factors forced ministers to look to the lay leaders of the parish, whether as elders or vestrymen, making them subject to factional struggles within the church life of the parish community. This chapter assesses the establishment and operation of Presbyterianism in London’s parishes during the 1640s and 1650s, as well as the practical difficulties, economic and administrative, that godly pastors experienced at the parochial level as a result of the dismantling of the Church of England.
本章考察了在空位时期伦敦教区牧师和会众之间的关系。它讲述了内战爆发时,国会要求虔诚的牧师改革教区纪律,防止"淫乱的人群"污染英格兰教区圣餐,商讨权威问题,改变崇拜和礼拜仪式,以及本已存在争议的赞助和财政问题。这些因素迫使牧师们求助于教区的世俗领袖,无论是长老还是司祭,使他们成为教区社区教会生活中派系斗争的对象。这一章评估了1640年代和1650年代伦敦教区长老会的建立和运作,以及英格兰国教会解体后,虔诚的牧师在教区层面所经历的经济和行政上的实际困难。
{"title":"Godly Pastors and their Congregations in Mid-Seventeenth-Century London","authors":"E. Vernon","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the relationship between pastor and congregation in the London parishes during the Interregnum. It addresses how godly ministers, called on by Parliament at the outbreak of the Civil War to reform parochial discipline and prevent the ‘promiscuous multitude’ from polluting the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper in England’s parish churches, negotiated issues of authority, changes to worship and liturgy, and the already contentious issues of patronage and finance. These factors forced ministers to look to the lay leaders of the parish, whether as elders or vestrymen, making them subject to factional struggles within the church life of the parish community. This chapter assesses the establishment and operation of Presbyterianism in London’s parishes during the 1640s and 1650s, as well as the practical difficulties, economic and administrative, that godly pastors experienced at the parochial level as a result of the dismantling of the Church of England.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120874193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Print and Pastoral Identity 印刷品与牧区身份
Pub Date : 2019-05-16 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0009
A. Hughes
This chapter explores the poignant dilemmas of those Presbyterian clergy who suffered ejection from their livings in 1662 following the passing and enforcement of the Act of Uniformity. Their commitment to a national church meant that they were reluctant Dissenters, demonstrated in ambiguous and complex relationships with the restored episcopal Church of England. For the likes of Samuel Clarke, Thomas Watson, Thomas Case, and other ejected Presbyterian ministers, print offered a way of establishing a virtual pastoral identity during the Restoration, not only through the production of new works but also through reissues of material first published during the 1640s and 1650s. The legacy of the Civil War was thus double-edged, in some ways comprising a culture of defeat, yet also contributing to a resolute and distinctive Presbyterian legacy through a vibrant print culture and the ongoing memorialization of Nonconformity.
这一章探讨了长老会神职人员的尖锐困境,他们在1662年《统一法案》的通过和执行后被驱逐出他们的生活。他们对国家教会的承诺意味着他们是不情愿的非国教者,这体现在他们与复兴的英国圣公会的模糊而复杂的关系上。对于塞缪尔·克拉克,托马斯·沃森,托马斯·凯斯,以及其他被驱逐的长老会牧师来说,印刷提供了一种在复辟时期建立虚拟牧师身份的方式,不仅通过新作品的生产,还通过重新发行1640年代和1650年代首次出版的材料。因此,内战的遗产是一把双刃剑,在某种程度上包括了一种失败的文化,但也通过充满活力的印刷文化和对不符合的持续纪念,形成了一种坚定而独特的长老会遗产。
{"title":"Print and Pastoral Identity","authors":"A. Hughes","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198753193.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the poignant dilemmas of those Presbyterian clergy who suffered ejection from their livings in 1662 following the passing and enforcement of the Act of Uniformity. Their commitment to a national church meant that they were reluctant Dissenters, demonstrated in ambiguous and complex relationships with the restored episcopal Church of England. For the likes of Samuel Clarke, Thomas Watson, Thomas Case, and other ejected Presbyterian ministers, print offered a way of establishing a virtual pastoral identity during the Restoration, not only through the production of new works but also through reissues of material first published during the 1640s and 1650s. The legacy of the Civil War was thus double-edged, in some ways comprising a culture of defeat, yet also contributing to a resolute and distinctive Presbyterian legacy through a vibrant print culture and the ongoing memorialization of Nonconformity.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129366641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Freedom of Association and Ecclesiastical Independence 结社自由与教会独立
Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0006
Polly Ha
Associational freedom played a key role in reconfiguring ecclesiastical and political thought during the Interregnum. This chapter explores how Puritan Independents such as Henry Jacob and John Goodwin advanced arguments for the freedom of association by claiming a dual freedom to exit from true churches and to join or even to establish new formal ecclesiastical societies. During the English Revolution some Independents began to assert more controversial claims for the freedom to exclude others from their churches, over matters such as paedobaptism, for example. These ecclesiastical positions resonated with wider debates over institutional legitimacy during the 1640s and 1650s and also with changing views on the bonds of society and the limits of individual liberty at a time when England’s most revolutionary experiments with both popular government and godly forms of church life were being undertaken.
在过渡时期,结社自由在教会和政治思想的重构中发挥了关键作用。这一章探讨了像亨利·雅各布和约翰·古德温这样的清教徒独立主义者是如何通过宣称一种双重自由,即退出真正的教会和加入甚至建立新的正式教会团体,来推进结社自由的论点的。在英国革命期间,一些独立派人士开始主张更有争议的主张,要求将其他人排除在他们的教会之外的自由,例如在童洗等问题上。这些教会立场引起了1640年代和1650年代关于制度合法性的广泛争论,也引起了对社会联系和个人自由限制的看法的变化,当时英国正在进行最具革命性的实验,即人民政府和虔诚的教会生活形式。
{"title":"The Freedom of Association and Ecclesiastical Independence","authors":"Polly Ha","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Associational freedom played a key role in reconfiguring ecclesiastical and political thought during the Interregnum. This chapter explores how Puritan Independents such as Henry Jacob and John Goodwin advanced arguments for the freedom of association by claiming a dual freedom to exit from true churches and to join or even to establish new formal ecclesiastical societies. During the English Revolution some Independents began to assert more controversial claims for the freedom to exclude others from their churches, over matters such as paedobaptism, for example. These ecclesiastical positions resonated with wider debates over institutional legitimacy during the 1640s and 1650s and also with changing views on the bonds of society and the limits of individual liberty at a time when England’s most revolutionary experiments with both popular government and godly forms of church life were being undertaken.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115579897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Not Keeping One’s Place in the Church’ “不守自己在教会的地位”
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0011
Anne Dunan-Page
This chapter examines the issue of absenteeism in seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century gathered churches through their manuscript church records. Absenteeism was the offence most frequently cited in disciplinary meetings, yet some members who were censured for absence were active supporters of their churches in other ways. This chapter focuses on those members who were never under a sentence of excommunication but who had ceased to be involved in church life and to take communion. It examines the question of Dissenting identity through lay participation, the reasons why men and women ceased to come to church, and what prompted them to seek reconciliation, sometimes decades after their first admission. Evidence is taken from manuscript church records belonging to Congregational, Particular Baptist, and General Baptist churches, spanning the period c.1640 to c.1714.
本章通过教会记录的手稿,考察了17世纪和18世纪早期聚集教会的旷工问题。在纪律会议上,旷工是最常被提及的罪行,然而,一些因旷工而受到谴责的成员在其他方面是他们教会的积极支持者。这一章的重点是那些从未被逐出教会,但已经停止参与教会生活和接受圣餐的成员。书中探讨了非信徒参与的身份认同问题,男性和女性不再来教堂的原因,以及是什么促使他们寻求和解,有时是在他们第一次进入教堂几十年后。证据取自公理会、特别浸信会和一般浸信会的教会记录手稿,时间跨度从1640年到1714年。
{"title":"‘Not Keeping One’s Place in the Church’","authors":"Anne Dunan-Page","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0011","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the issue of absenteeism in seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century gathered churches through their manuscript church records. Absenteeism was the offence most frequently cited in disciplinary meetings, yet some members who were censured for absence were active supporters of their churches in other ways. This chapter focuses on those members who were never under a sentence of excommunication but who had ceased to be involved in church life and to take communion. It examines the question of Dissenting identity through lay participation, the reasons why men and women ceased to come to church, and what prompted them to seek reconciliation, sometimes decades after their first admission. Evidence is taken from manuscript church records belonging to Congregational, Particular Baptist, and General Baptist churches, spanning the period c.1640 to c.1714.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116277807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
God’s Physicians 神的医生
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0005
C. V. Dixhoorn
In accordance with its mandate from Parliament, the one hundred and twenty pastors brought together by the Westminster Assembly discussed doctrinal, disciplinary, and liturgical matters. Inevitably members of the gathering also found frequent occasion to disagree about best pastoral practice for parishioners struggling with sin, sickness, and ignorance. This chapter uses the viewpoints and arguments of Assembly members in a case study of seventeenth-century ideals regarding the pastor as godly shepherd and physician. Naturally the debates of a ten-year synod may not offer the best sampling of real-life pastoral perspectives. Thus this chapter sources its materials not only from the minutes of the Assembly but also from the personal papers and published works of its individual members. What emerges is a rich yet reliable picture of the range of perspectives on congregational care that obtained at the Westminster Assembly during some of the most critical years of the mid seventeenth century.
根据议会的授权,120位牧师被威斯敏斯特议会召集在一起讨论教义、纪律和礼仪问题。不可避免的是,聚会的成员也经常发现,对于与罪恶、疾病和无知作斗争的教区居民的最佳教牧实践,存在分歧。本章使用的观点和论据的大会成员在17世纪的理想的案例研究关于牧师作为敬虔的牧羊人和医生。自然,十年会议的辩论可能无法提供现实生活中牧灵视角的最佳样本。因此,本章的材料不仅来自大会的会议记录,而且也来自其个别成员的个人文件和已出版的作品。在17世纪中期最关键的几年里,威斯敏斯特议会获得了丰富而可靠的关于教会关怀的观点。
{"title":"God’s Physicians","authors":"C. V. Dixhoorn","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753193.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"In accordance with its mandate from Parliament, the one hundred and twenty pastors brought together by the Westminster Assembly discussed doctrinal, disciplinary, and liturgical matters. Inevitably members of the gathering also found frequent occasion to disagree about best pastoral practice for parishioners struggling with sin, sickness, and ignorance. This chapter uses the viewpoints and arguments of Assembly members in a case study of seventeenth-century ideals regarding the pastor as godly shepherd and physician. Naturally the debates of a ten-year synod may not offer the best sampling of real-life pastoral perspectives. Thus this chapter sources its materials not only from the minutes of the Assembly but also from the personal papers and published works of its individual members. What emerges is a rich yet reliable picture of the range of perspectives on congregational care that obtained at the Westminster Assembly during some of the most critical years of the mid seventeenth century.","PeriodicalId":270199,"journal":{"name":"Church Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122327973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Church Life
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1