Generation Z, the youngest economically active generation in the labour markets, is currently entering its professional life. As with previous generations, representatives of the generation Z (1995-2010) are typical for their characteristics, attitudes or requirements. For companies, the task then arises in the form of identification of these motivational, but also demotivational factors, for effective management and motivation of their employees. The aim of the study is an identification and mutual comparison of motivational factors and barriers in the conditions of the Czech Republic. The research is carried out using the method of empathy-based stories (MEBS), which is based on short fictional stories and works with empathy of the respondents. The research sample consists of 134 respondents who identified a total of 481 items of motivation drivers and 496 items of motivation barriers, which are part of 5 clusters. According to the results, it is clear that the factors include the relationship with co-workers and the atmosphere in the workplace, remuneration and meaningful job. On the contrary, the factors with the least influence can include work-life balance or job security, for which, however, the influence of the structure of the research sample, which consists of university students, is possible. Regarding clusters, the areas of Relationships at work and Work-related factors have the largest share (importance). On the contrary, the least importance is given to the areas of Achievement (Career and Learning) and Out of work (personal) factors. A significant agreement of de / motivational factors was discovered in an international comparison with research based on the same method of data collection.
{"title":"MOTIVATION DRIVERS AND BARRIERS OF GENERATION Z AT WORK: MEBS METHOD","authors":"Jiří Kutlák","doi":"10.7441/dokbat.2020.27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2020.27","url":null,"abstract":"Generation Z, the youngest economically active generation in the labour markets, is currently entering its professional life. As with previous generations, representatives of the generation Z (1995-2010) are typical for their characteristics, attitudes or requirements. For companies, the task then arises in the form of identification of these motivational, but also demotivational factors, for effective management and motivation of their employees. The aim of the study is an identification and mutual comparison of motivational factors and barriers in the conditions of the Czech Republic. The research is carried out using the method of empathy-based stories (MEBS), which is based on short fictional stories and works with empathy of the respondents. The research sample consists of 134 respondents who identified a total of 481 items of motivation drivers and 496 items of motivation barriers, which are part of 5 clusters. According to the results, it is clear that the factors include the relationship with co-workers and the atmosphere in the workplace, remuneration and meaningful job. On the contrary, the factors with the least influence can include work-life balance or job security, for which, however, the influence of the structure of the research sample, which consists of university students, is possible. Regarding clusters, the areas of Relationships at work and Work-related factors have the largest share (importance). On the contrary, the least importance is given to the areas of Achievement (Career and Learning) and Out of work (personal) factors. A significant agreement of de / motivational factors was discovered in an international comparison with research based on the same method of data collection.","PeriodicalId":270382,"journal":{"name":"DOKBAT 2020 - 16th International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114843488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"BUSINESS MODELS FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND SMES’ SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK","authors":"Adwoa Yeboaa Owusu Yeboah, P. Novák","doi":"10.7441/dokbat.2020.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2020.34","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":270382,"journal":{"name":"DOKBAT 2020 - 16th International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128821805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of project risks has a significant impact on the success of the entire project. The importance of project risk management also means the need for continuous measurement and development of this area. Considering the existence of few specialized maturity models for this area, the aim of this paper is to analyse the extent to which it is possible to use commonly used project management maturity models (PMMMs) as a full-fledged tool for the evaluation of project risk management maturity. Based on the literature review and selected methodology, the four most frequently used models of maturity (CMMI-DEV, OPM3, PMMM, KPMMM) are analysed in more detail. Despite the predominantly exploratory nature of this paper, based on four defined criteria, three of the above PMMMs can also be used as models for evaluating and improving Project Risk Management. While one of the outputs of this paper is the creation of an evaluation scale for the PRM assessment, based on the regularities of the models used. By outlining the possibility of using already existing PMMMs, the results of this paper contribute to the evolving field of improving the management of project risks as a key project management area. In addition, results point out the expanded use of already existing PMMMs.
{"title":"USE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODELS AS A EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT RISK MATURITY ASSESSMENT","authors":"Adam Faifr","doi":"10.7441/dokbat.2020.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2020.11","url":null,"abstract":"Management of project risks has a significant impact on the success of the entire project. The importance of project risk management also means the need for continuous measurement and development of this area. Considering the existence of few specialized maturity models for this area, the aim of this paper is to analyse the extent to which it is possible to use commonly used project management maturity models (PMMMs) as a full-fledged tool for the evaluation of project risk management maturity. Based on the literature review and selected methodology, the four most frequently used models of maturity (CMMI-DEV, OPM3, PMMM, KPMMM) are analysed in more detail. Despite the predominantly exploratory nature of this paper, based on four defined criteria, three of the above PMMMs can also be used as models for evaluating and improving Project Risk Management. While one of the outputs of this paper is the creation of an evaluation scale for the PRM assessment, based on the regularities of the models used. By outlining the possibility of using already existing PMMMs, the results of this paper contribute to the evolving field of improving the management of project risks as a key project management area. In addition, results point out the expanded use of already existing PMMMs.","PeriodicalId":270382,"journal":{"name":"DOKBAT 2020 - 16th International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125238106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：