首页 > 最新文献

eLearn Magazine最新文献

英文 中文
What Do College Faculty and Businesses Think About Online Education? 大学教师和企业如何看待在线教育?
Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.1145/3295776.3274758
Melissa Andrews
Since 1994, student enrollments in online education programs have dramatically increased. As colleges and businesses expand their use of e-learning, it has become more and more important to find cost-effective ways to deliver instruction and training that will meet student and business needs. Perceptions of what constitutes quality programs by faculty members, the community, administrators and businesses all vary making planning for the future even more difficult. Little research in the field also compounds the complexity of knowing which strategy will provide colleges and businesses the quality standards that it requires. This indecision and lack of information is often what leads to poor training practices for online instructors, limited knowledge of program components by hiring managers and biases about student capabilities when comparing an online to traditional programs. Questions about how to strategically plan online programs, determining the quality of online programs and responding to growth are issues that colleges will have to address in the future to sustain growth. This article highlights various studies and statistics to explain why perceptions about online learning are contributing to the lack of planning and indecision in online education focus. As more and more students obtain online degrees and enter the job market, it is interesting to explore how businesses and college faculty really feel about the switch from traditional to online degree programs.
自1994年以来,在线教育项目的学生注册人数急剧增加。随着高校和企业扩大对电子学习的使用,寻找符合成本效益的方式来提供教学和培训,以满足学生和企业的需求变得越来越重要。教师、社区、管理人员和企业对什么是高质量课程的看法各不相同,这使得规划未来变得更加困难。这一领域的研究很少,也使了解哪种策略能够为高校和企业提供所需的质量标准变得更加复杂。这种优柔寡断和信息的缺乏往往导致在线教师的培训实践不佳,招聘经理对课程组成部分的了解有限,以及在将在线课程与传统课程进行比较时对学生能力的偏见。如何战略性地规划在线课程、确定在线课程的质量以及应对增长等问题,都是大学未来必须解决的问题,以保持增长。本文重点介绍了各种研究和统计数据,以解释为什么对在线学习的看法会导致在线教育重点缺乏规划和优柔寡断。随着越来越多的学生获得在线学位并进入就业市场,探索企业和大学教师对从传统学位课程转向在线学位课程的真实感受是一件有趣的事情。
{"title":"What Do College Faculty and Businesses Think About Online Education?","authors":"Melissa Andrews","doi":"10.1145/3295776.3274758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295776.3274758","url":null,"abstract":"Since 1994, student enrollments in online education programs have dramatically increased. As colleges and businesses expand their use of e-learning, it has become more and more important to find cost-effective ways to deliver instruction and training that will meet student and business needs. Perceptions of what constitutes quality programs by faculty members, the community, administrators and businesses all vary making planning for the future even more difficult. Little research in the field also compounds the complexity of knowing which strategy will provide colleges and businesses the quality standards that it requires. This indecision and lack of information is often what leads to poor training practices for online instructors, limited knowledge of program components by hiring managers and biases about student capabilities when comparing an online to traditional programs. Questions about how to strategically plan online programs, determining the quality of online programs and responding to growth are issues that colleges will have to address in the future to sustain growth. This article highlights various studies and statistics to explain why perceptions about online learning are contributing to the lack of planning and indecision in online education focus. As more and more students obtain online degrees and enter the job market, it is interesting to explore how businesses and college faculty really feel about the switch from traditional to online degree programs.","PeriodicalId":325501,"journal":{"name":"eLearn Magazine","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125317700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
eLearn Magazine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1