Pub Date : 2023-11-08DOI: 10.1080/17567505.2023.2279386
Sarah Baker, Zelmarie Cantillon, Chelsea Evans
ABSTRACTIn heritage management plans, maps have long been used to draw boundaries around regions and plot natural and cultural sites, trails and routes. Attention to participatory mapping and counter-mapping has increased alongside trends towards bottom-up approaches to heritage that recognise local communities as experts in their own heritage. This article reflects on participatory mapping activities undertaken on Norfolk Island, home to the UNESCO World Heritage listed Kingston and Arthur’s Vale Historic Area. Since the production of the first management plan in 1980, heritage management of Kingston has overwhelmingly privileged the preservation and interpretation of its convict heritage, with historically little attention paid to the island’s past Polynesian settlement and the ongoing Pitcairn settlement since 1856. The article presents findings from collaborative mapping exercises centred on routes, customary practices, and emotions undertaken with Pitcairn Settler descendants and others with long and deep connections to Norfolk Island. In particular, we focus on participants’ commentaries on Kingston’s heritage management. Our analysis highlights the importance of protecting heritage in ways that account for everyday and contemporary experiences, emotional resonances, and unbounded uses of this living heritage site.KEYWORDS: Heritage managementliving heritageWorld HeritageNorfolk IslandKingston and Arthur’s Vale Historic AreaAustralian Convict Sitesparticipatory mappingcounter-mappingmobilitiesemotions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. Poulios, “Discussing Strategy in Heritage Conservation,” 21.2. Ibid., 23.3. Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts et al., Conservation Management Plan, 66.4. Smith, “Towards a Theoretical Framework,” 62.5. Department of Home Affairs and Environment, KAVHA Management Plan.6. Smith, Uses of Heritage.7. Avrami, “Spatializing Values in Heritage Conservation,” 35.8. Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts et al., Conservation Management Plan, 22.9. Harley, “Maps, Knowledge, and Power”10. Campos-Delgado, “Counter-Mapping Migration”11. Sletto, “We Drew What We Imagined,” 445.12. e.g. Peluso, “Whose Woods Are These?”; Boatca, “Counter-Mapping as Method”13. e.g. Lobo et al., “Practising Lively Geographies”; Boschmann and Cubbon, “Sketch Maps and Qualitative GIS”14. e.g. Sletto, “We Drew What We Imagined”; Rye and Kurniawan, “‘Claiming Indigenous Rights”15. Wainwright and Bryan, “Cartography, Territory, Property,” 153.16. Ibid., 169.17. Reitz, “Back to the Drawing Board,” 328.18. Ibid. 327.19. Campos-Delgado, “Counter-Mapping Migration”20. Kim, “Critical Cartography 2.0,” 215.21. Avrami, “Spatializing Values in Heritage Conservation”; Brown, “Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management and Mapping”; Byrne and Nugent, Mapping Attachment; Byrne, “Counter-Mapping”; Harrison, “’Counter-Mapping’ Heritage, Communities and Places”; La Frenier
见Poulios，“讨论遗产保护策略”50。Wijesuriya，“活的遗产”，43.51。澳大利亚政府，基础设施、交通、区域发展、通信和艺术等部门，金斯顿站点总体规划，4,5,10,20,28.52。如上,38.53。同上，38,42.54。同上，42,43.55。如上,45.56。麦克唐纳，《艰难的遗产》，第57页。Waterton et al.，“话语分析的效用”，第339页。本研究得到了澳大利亚研究委员会[SR200200711]的支持。
{"title":"Mapping Living Heritage in Kingston and Arthur’s Vale Historic Area, Norfolk Island: Routes, Customary Practices and Emotions","authors":"Sarah Baker, Zelmarie Cantillon, Chelsea Evans","doi":"10.1080/17567505.2023.2279386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2023.2279386","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn heritage management plans, maps have long been used to draw boundaries around regions and plot natural and cultural sites, trails and routes. Attention to participatory mapping and counter-mapping has increased alongside trends towards bottom-up approaches to heritage that recognise local communities as experts in their own heritage. This article reflects on participatory mapping activities undertaken on Norfolk Island, home to the UNESCO World Heritage listed Kingston and Arthur’s Vale Historic Area. Since the production of the first management plan in 1980, heritage management of Kingston has overwhelmingly privileged the preservation and interpretation of its convict heritage, with historically little attention paid to the island’s past Polynesian settlement and the ongoing Pitcairn settlement since 1856. The article presents findings from collaborative mapping exercises centred on routes, customary practices, and emotions undertaken with Pitcairn Settler descendants and others with long and deep connections to Norfolk Island. In particular, we focus on participants’ commentaries on Kingston’s heritage management. Our analysis highlights the importance of protecting heritage in ways that account for everyday and contemporary experiences, emotional resonances, and unbounded uses of this living heritage site.KEYWORDS: Heritage managementliving heritageWorld HeritageNorfolk IslandKingston and Arthur’s Vale Historic AreaAustralian Convict Sitesparticipatory mappingcounter-mappingmobilitiesemotions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. Poulios, “Discussing Strategy in Heritage Conservation,” 21.2. Ibid., 23.3. Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts et al., Conservation Management Plan, 66.4. Smith, “Towards a Theoretical Framework,” 62.5. Department of Home Affairs and Environment, KAVHA Management Plan.6. Smith, Uses of Heritage.7. Avrami, “Spatializing Values in Heritage Conservation,” 35.8. Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts et al., Conservation Management Plan, 22.9. Harley, “Maps, Knowledge, and Power”10. Campos-Delgado, “Counter-Mapping Migration”11. Sletto, “We Drew What We Imagined,” 445.12. e.g. Peluso, “Whose Woods Are These?”; Boatca, “Counter-Mapping as Method”13. e.g. Lobo et al., “Practising Lively Geographies”; Boschmann and Cubbon, “Sketch Maps and Qualitative GIS”14. e.g. Sletto, “We Drew What We Imagined”; Rye and Kurniawan, “‘Claiming Indigenous Rights”15. Wainwright and Bryan, “Cartography, Territory, Property,” 153.16. Ibid., 169.17. Reitz, “Back to the Drawing Board,” 328.18. Ibid. 327.19. Campos-Delgado, “Counter-Mapping Migration”20. Kim, “Critical Cartography 2.0,” 215.21. Avrami, “Spatializing Values in Heritage Conservation”; Brown, “Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management and Mapping”; Byrne and Nugent, Mapping Attachment; Byrne, “Counter-Mapping”; Harrison, “’Counter-Mapping’ Heritage, Communities and Places”; La Frenier","PeriodicalId":331310,"journal":{"name":"The Historic Environment","volume":"102 8‐10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135393328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-03DOI: 10.1080/17567505.2023.2261328
Farzaneh Gharaati, Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad, Adam Nadolny, Hassan Bazazzadeh
ABSTRACTAdaptive reuse of Industrial heritage is among the most common of sustainable approaches to preserve heritage values and pass them on to the future generations. It also leads to a reduction in environmental effects, and carbon footprint. The purpose of this research is to present an assessment of the sustainability of 12 Iranian adaptively reused industrial heritage sites in light of international charters. To reach this objective, 7 indexes and 20 indicators have been selected in terms of principles of sustainability and compliance with the green international charters. Then, five experts were interviewed through focus group discussion (FGD) to assess the cases based on the sustainable criteria. The findings indicate that the case studies generally meet sustainability criteria set by international charters, however community participation in the decision – making process and more creativity is highly recommended in the green adaptive reuse process. Moreover, it was observed that mixed-use flourishes in contrast to other alternatives. This research, aims to evaluate the case studies of the adaptively reused in Iran covering strengths and weaknesses to use the experience gained in future studies. Although this study focused on Iranian cases, the methodology can be useful in similar cases worldwide in the future.KEYWORDS: Green adaptive reuseindustrial heritage of Iraninternational chartersfuture generationlow-carbon architecturesustainability assessment AcknowledgmentsThis article is based on the first author’s Ph.D. thesis in Tarbiat Modares university of Tehran, Iran with collaboration of Prof. Mahdavinejad as supervisor and Prof. Adam Nadolny as advisor.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Geolocation InformationIndustrial Heritage Case studies of Iran.Notes1. Bullen & Love, “Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings”, a: 419.2. Markus and Oevermann, “Neighbourhood revitalisation and heritage conservation”, 244.3. Sulimowska-Ociepka, Glass Structures in Post-Industrial Buildings: 282–34. ibid, 284.5. TICCIH.6. Douglas, Building Adaptation.7. Farjami and Turker, “The Extraction of Prerequisite Criteria” :3.8. Bullen and love, b, Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings: 42.9. Sowi´nska-Heim, 2020: 4.10. Conejos, Optimisation of future building adaptive reuse: 1.11. Fisher, Adaptive reuse architecture documentation: 6.12. Gregorio et.al, “Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage”: 2.13. Arfa et.al., Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: 156.14. Sulimowska-Ociepka, “Glass Structures in Post-Industrial Buildings”: 284.15. Kilinç, “Value assessment for industrial heritage”: 27–4516. Gregorio et.al, “Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage”: 3.17. Vardopoulos, “Critical sustainable development factors”: 2.18. Bullen & love “Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings.”19. Fouad et.al. “The innovative reuse of post-indust
摘要工业遗产的适应性再利用是保护遗产价值并将其传递给子孙后代的最常见的可持续方法之一。它还可以减少对环境的影响和碳足迹。本研究的目的是根据国际宪章，对12个伊朗适应性再利用工业遗产遗址的可持续性进行评估。为了实现这一目标，根据可持续发展和遵守绿色国际宪章的原则，选择了7个指数和20个指标。然后，通过焦点小组讨论(FGD)对五位专家进行访谈，根据可持续标准对案例进行评估。研究结果表明，这些案例研究总体上符合国际宪章所设定的可持续发展标准，但在绿色适应性再利用过程中，强烈建议社区参与决策过程并发挥更多的创造力。此外，据观察，与其他替代方案相比，混合用途蓬勃发展。本研究旨在评估伊朗适应性重用的案例研究，涵盖优势和劣势，以便在未来的研究中使用所获得的经验。虽然这项研究的重点是伊朗的案例，但该方法在未来可能对世界各地的类似案例有用。关键词:绿色适应性再利用伊朗工业遗产国际宪章未来一代低碳建筑可持续性评估本文基于第一作者在伊朗德黑兰大学Tarbiat Modares的博士论文，导师为Mahdavinejad教授，指导老师为Adam Nadolny教授。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。伊朗地理位置信息产业遗产案例研究[j]。Bullen & Love，“影响建筑适应性再利用的因素”，第1期:419.2。Markus和Oevermann，“社区振兴和遗产保护”，244.3。后工业建筑中的玻璃结构:282-34。如上,284.5。TICCIH.6。道格拉斯，《建筑改造》。Farjami和Turker，“先决条件的提取”，第3.8页。b，建筑适应性再利用的影响因素;42。索维恩斯卡-海姆，2020:4.10。Conejos，未来建筑适应性再利用的优化:1.11。Fisher，自适应重用架构文档:6.12。Gregorio et.al .“设计工业遗产的可持续适应性再利用”:2.13。阿尔发出版社。，历史建筑的适应性再利用:156.14。Sulimowska-Ociepka，“后工业建筑中的玻璃结构”，第284.15期。Kilinç，《工业遗产价值评估》:27-4516。Gregorio等，“设计工业遗产的可持续适应性再利用”:3.17。Vardopoulos，“关键的可持续发展因素”，第2.18页。《影响建筑物适应性再利用的因素》19。Fouad出版社。“后工业遗产的创新再利用”。Shehata等人，《走向全面和系统的评估》，第21页。杨等人，《创造性破坏》，22。Najmaldin，《工业建筑的适应性再利用》，第23期。Conejos，“未来建筑适应性再利用的优化”，24。Plevoets & Sowińska-Heim“社区倡议作为再生催化剂”25。任、韩，“建筑遗产景点可持续性评估指标”，26。Tan等人，《工业建筑适应性再利用的关键成功因素》，第27页。黄、张，“自适应指标与权重体系”，第28期。Leus & Verhelst，《城市遗存遗址的可持续性评估》29。谭浩，“可持续发展中的适应性再利用”。Bottero“自适应重用策略的排名”31。Aigwi等人，“为基于性能的框架识别参数”32。《保存、再生和呈现的可能性》33。《工业遗产在可持续旅游中的作用》34Hanapi出版社。“基于绩效的框架”，第35页。De Medici等人，“文化遗产与可持续发展”，第36页。Pintossi等人，“评估文化遗产适应性再利用实践”37。boone等，“文化遗产适应性再利用的前后评价指标”，第38期。姜等，《山东省文化遗产可持续性评价》，第39期。“文化遗产建筑的可持续性评价模型”，《文化遗产管理》，2004。《对一家历史皮革工厂的分析调查》第41页。阿什塔里“提高城市生活质量”42。Samadzadehyazdi出版社。“真实性的重要性”43。44. Lotfi & Sholeh《从“专制”到“创造性”的自适应重用梯度》Faramarzi因绝食抗议多日出版社。“调查影响景观适应的因素”。Amirkhani出版社。促进旅游业的未来战略。Bazazzadeh出版社。工业遗产适应性再利用中灵活性的重要性[j]。Ghomeshi出版社。《健康应对后冠状病毒病》，第48期。 Mehan and Abdul Razak，《伊朗和马来西亚的石油遗产》，第49页。Masoud and Gharipour，《发展一个衡量文化价值的模型》，第50页。Seddighikhavidak和Tazim“祖先纺织手工艺的相互关系”，51。Angelakis出版社。“水磨机的可持续和再生发展”。Bazazzadeh出版社。53.“大流行病后建筑环境的循环经济”。Bazazzadeh出版社。工业遗产的属性评价[j]。Porkar出版社。，“实现自适应重用策略”。55。Shirzadnia等人，“天窗配置的设计师方法”56。Samadzadehyazdi，“真实性的意义”:7.57。德黑兰市政府“工业建筑遗产保护研究项目”。Eraji和Yekani Fard，“第一个巴列维时代伊朗建筑的评价”，第226.59页。Fisher，“自适应重用架构文档”:1;
{"title":"Sustainable Assessment of Built Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practice: Iranian Industrial Heritage in the Light of International Charters","authors":"Farzaneh Gharaati, Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad, Adam Nadolny, Hassan Bazazzadeh","doi":"10.1080/17567505.2023.2261328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2023.2261328","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAdaptive reuse of Industrial heritage is among the most common of sustainable approaches to preserve heritage values and pass them on to the future generations. It also leads to a reduction in environmental effects, and carbon footprint. The purpose of this research is to present an assessment of the sustainability of 12 Iranian adaptively reused industrial heritage sites in light of international charters. To reach this objective, 7 indexes and 20 indicators have been selected in terms of principles of sustainability and compliance with the green international charters. Then, five experts were interviewed through focus group discussion (FGD) to assess the cases based on the sustainable criteria. The findings indicate that the case studies generally meet sustainability criteria set by international charters, however community participation in the decision – making process and more creativity is highly recommended in the green adaptive reuse process. Moreover, it was observed that mixed-use flourishes in contrast to other alternatives. This research, aims to evaluate the case studies of the adaptively reused in Iran covering strengths and weaknesses to use the experience gained in future studies. Although this study focused on Iranian cases, the methodology can be useful in similar cases worldwide in the future.KEYWORDS: Green adaptive reuseindustrial heritage of Iraninternational chartersfuture generationlow-carbon architecturesustainability assessment AcknowledgmentsThis article is based on the first author’s Ph.D. thesis in Tarbiat Modares university of Tehran, Iran with collaboration of Prof. Mahdavinejad as supervisor and Prof. Adam Nadolny as advisor.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Geolocation InformationIndustrial Heritage Case studies of Iran.Notes1. Bullen & Love, “Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings”, a: 419.2. Markus and Oevermann, “Neighbourhood revitalisation and heritage conservation”, 244.3. Sulimowska-Ociepka, Glass Structures in Post-Industrial Buildings: 282–34. ibid, 284.5. TICCIH.6. Douglas, Building Adaptation.7. Farjami and Turker, “The Extraction of Prerequisite Criteria” :3.8. Bullen and love, b, Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings: 42.9. Sowi´nska-Heim, 2020: 4.10. Conejos, Optimisation of future building adaptive reuse: 1.11. Fisher, Adaptive reuse architecture documentation: 6.12. Gregorio et.al, “Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage”: 2.13. Arfa et.al., Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: 156.14. Sulimowska-Ociepka, “Glass Structures in Post-Industrial Buildings”: 284.15. Kilinç, “Value assessment for industrial heritage”: 27–4516. Gregorio et.al, “Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage”: 3.17. Vardopoulos, “Critical sustainable development factors”: 2.18. Bullen & love “Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings.”19. Fouad et.al. “The innovative reuse of post-indust","PeriodicalId":331310,"journal":{"name":"The Historic Environment","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135696390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：