Ce texte présente les résultats de deux recherches sur les facteurs jouant un rôle dans le processus de prise en main de la question énergétique au niveau territorial. Adoptant une double approche empirique (un questionnaire et des entretiens semi-directifs), nous avons analysé le rôle de plusieurs facteurs possibles, soit offert comme explication par la littérature soit comme éléments d’explications dans nos deux terrains, pour déterminer ceux qui jouent un rôle de ceux qui sont inopérants. La première section présente le contexte et la seconde les résultats d’une enquête, tandis que la troisième propose une comparaison thématique avec des cas étrangers (en Grande-Bretagne, en Allemagne et Autriche) analysés dans le cadre du projet pour le Conseil Français de l’Énergie.
{"title":"La prise\u0000 en main de l’énergie par les collectivités territoriales : freins et\u0000 moteurs","authors":"Stéphane La Branche, Pascale Bosbœuf","doi":"10.7202/1050497AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1050497AR","url":null,"abstract":"Ce texte présente les résultats de deux recherches sur les\u0000 facteurs jouant un rôle dans le processus de prise en main de la question\u0000 énergétique au niveau territorial. Adoptant une double approche empirique (un\u0000 questionnaire et des entretiens semi-directifs), nous avons analysé le rôle de\u0000 plusieurs facteurs possibles, soit offert comme explication par la littérature\u0000 soit comme éléments d’explications dans nos deux terrains, pour déterminer ceux\u0000 qui jouent un rôle de ceux qui sont inopérants.\u0000 La première section présente le contexte et la seconde les\u0000 résultats d’une enquête, tandis que la troisième propose une comparaison\u0000 thématique avec des cas étrangers (en Grande-Bretagne, en Allemagne et Autriche)\u0000 analysés dans le cadre du projet pour le Conseil Français de l’Énergie.","PeriodicalId":345462,"journal":{"name":"Environnement urbain","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122512575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper investigates evolutions in and alternatives to the “sustainable development” paradigm and examines these new trends. It offers a review of the social science literature that focuses on the language of the “sustainable city” used by researchers and experts in sociology, geography and urban studies since 2009. First, five main variants of “sustainable city” discourses are evidenced by the statistical and lexical analyses: the “recyclable city”, the “compact city”, the “green city”, the “just city” and the “participatory city”. They are often in conflict and subject to debate. Then, four main “alternatives” are identified: degrowth, resilience, sustainable transformation and transition. Yet they remain specific to restricted sectors or characterized by a binary vision.
{"title":"Definitions and Redefinitions of Urban Sustainability: A Bibliometric Approach","authors":"P. Hamman","doi":"10.7202/1050496AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1050496AR","url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates evolutions in and alternatives to the “sustainable development” paradigm and examines these new trends. It offers a review of the social science literature that focuses on the language of the “sustainable city” used by researchers and experts in sociology, geography and urban studies since 2009. First, five main variants of “sustainable city” discourses are evidenced by the statistical and lexical analyses: the “recyclable city”, the “compact city”, the “green city”, the “just city” and the “participatory city”. They are often in conflict and subject to debate. Then, four main “alternatives” are identified: degrowth, resilience, sustainable transformation and transition. Yet they remain specific to restricted sectors or characterized by a binary vision.","PeriodicalId":345462,"journal":{"name":"Environnement urbain","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134152971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this article we examine how (alongside with other factors) the relationship that individuals have to their living environment affects their leisure mobility. We first elaborate a typology (comprising 5 types) of individuals according to their stated relationship to their living environment. Using a statistical approach, we then show that this typology partially explains inter-individual differences in leisure mobility, after taking into account other socioeconomic and spatial explanatory factors: income, level of education, profession, residential location (esp. density of residential area) and demographic characteristics. This statistical argument is complemented with a qualitative study of the meanings given by individuals to their living environments and leisure mobility practices, which ultimately contributes to better understand the drivers of leisure mobility and to emphasize in particular the notion of compensatory mobility. A given urban context may accomodate very different practices and very diverse life projects and the approach developed in the paper has allowed to move away from deterministic explanations for leisure mobility.
{"title":"Leisure mobility and individuals’ relationship to the living environment: a comparison between the Paris and Rome urban regions.","authors":"H. Nessi","doi":"10.7202/1050582AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1050582AR","url":null,"abstract":"In this article we examine how (alongside with other factors) the relationship that individuals have to their living environment affects their leisure mobility. We first elaborate a typology (comprising 5 types) of individuals according to their stated relationship to their living environment. Using a statistical approach, we then show that this typology partially explains inter-individual differences in leisure mobility, after taking into account other socioeconomic and spatial explanatory factors: income, level of education, profession, residential location (esp. density of residential area) and demographic characteristics. This statistical argument is complemented with a qualitative study of the meanings given by individuals to their living environments and leisure mobility practices, which ultimately contributes to better understand the drivers of leisure mobility and to emphasize in particular the notion of compensatory mobility. A given urban context may accomodate very different practices and very diverse life projects and the approach developed in the paper has allowed to move away from deterministic explanations for leisure mobility.","PeriodicalId":345462,"journal":{"name":"Environnement urbain","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132071906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：