首页 > 最新文献

Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era最新文献

英文 中文
SEWARD AND EMPIRE, 1865–1869 苏厄德与帝国(1865-1869
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.8
J. A. Fry
This chapter examines Seward’s final four years as secretary of state during the Johnson administration, following Lincoln’s death. Sustaining the policy of diplomatic pressure, but disdaining military intervention, Seward defined domestic US calls for a more belligerent posture and defended the Monroe Doctrine by forcing Napoleon III to withdraw French forces from Mexico. More important, the secretary turned back to the imperial agenda he had proclaimed in the 1850s. His greatest imperial success came with the purchase of Alaska; but his emphasis on commercial expansion, attempts to acquire Hawaii and islands in the Caribbean, to build a canal through Panama, and to implement an “open door” policy in East Asia provided a prescient blueprint for US imperial actions and advancement to great power status at the turn of the twentieth century.
本章考察了林肯去世后,西沃德在约翰逊政府担任国务卿的最后四年。西沃德坚持外交施压政策,但蔑视军事干预,他将美国国内的呼吁定义为一种更加好战的姿态,并通过迫使拿破仑三世从墨西哥撤出法国军队来捍卫门罗主义。更重要的是,这位部长回到了他在19世纪50年代宣布的帝国议程。他最大的帝国成功来自于购买阿拉斯加;但他强调商业扩张,试图获得夏威夷和加勒比岛屿,修建巴拿马运河,并在东亚实施“门户开放”政策,为美国的帝国主义行动和在20世纪之交成为大国提供了有先见之明的蓝图。
{"title":"SEWARD AND EMPIRE, 1865–1869","authors":"J. A. Fry","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.8","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines Seward’s final four years as secretary of state during the Johnson administration, following Lincoln’s death. Sustaining the policy of diplomatic pressure, but disdaining military intervention, Seward defined domestic US calls for a more belligerent posture and defended the Monroe Doctrine by forcing Napoleon III to withdraw French forces from Mexico. More important, the secretary turned back to the imperial agenda he had proclaimed in the 1850s. His greatest imperial success came with the purchase of Alaska; but his emphasis on commercial expansion, attempts to acquire Hawaii and islands in the Caribbean, to build a canal through Panama, and to implement an “open door” policy in East Asia provided a prescient blueprint for US imperial actions and advancement to great power status at the turn of the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125287375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 致谢
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.10
{"title":"ACKNOWLEDGMENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115178664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
VICTORY AND THE DEATH OF THE PARTNERSHIP, 1863–1865 合伙企业的胜利与消亡(1863-1865年
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.7
J. A. Fry
This chapter examines US foreign policy challenges over the final two years of the war. Those challenges included the repercussions arising from US efforts to restrict neutral trade with the South, Confederate shipbuilding efforts in Great Britain and France, Confederate attempts to provoke an Anglo-American crisis by attacking the United States from Canada, and Napoleon III’s military and political intervention in Mexico and attempt to install a European monarch in the Western Hemisphere. By continuing their policy of belligerent warnings and timely conciliation, Lincoln and Seward successfully resolved all of these issues. Finally, this chapter includes coverage of the military and imperial dimensions of Lincoln’s policies toward Native Americans.
本章考察了战争最后两年美国外交政策面临的挑战。这些挑战包括美国限制与南方的中立贸易所带来的影响,邦联在英国和法国的造船努力,邦联试图通过从加拿大攻击美国来挑起英美危机,拿破仑三世在墨西哥的军事和政治干预,并试图在西半球安插一位欧洲君主。通过继续他们的好战警告和及时调解政策,林肯和苏厄德成功地解决了所有这些问题。最后,本章涵盖了林肯对印第安人政策的军事和帝国层面。
{"title":"VICTORY AND THE DEATH OF THE PARTNERSHIP, 1863–1865","authors":"J. A. Fry","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.7","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines US foreign policy challenges over the final two years of the war. Those challenges included the repercussions arising from US efforts to restrict neutral trade with the South, Confederate shipbuilding efforts in Great Britain and France, Confederate attempts to provoke an Anglo-American crisis by attacking the United States from Canada, and Napoleon III’s military and political intervention in Mexico and attempt to install a European monarch in the Western Hemisphere. By continuing their policy of belligerent warnings and timely conciliation, Lincoln and Seward successfully resolved all of these issues. Finally, this chapter includes coverage of the military and imperial dimensions of Lincoln’s policies toward Native Americans.","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131066188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conclusion 结论
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.5810/kentucky/9780813177120.003.0007
J. A. Fry
President Abraham Lincoln and Secretary of State William Henry Seward confronted the greatest foreign policy challenge of their young, and still impermanent, nation’s existence. With the South’s secession and potential European intervention in the Civil War, national survival was literally at stake. Neither President Lincoln nor Secretary of State Seward could boast of the relevant foreign policy background and experience of several of their better-prepared predecessors, such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, or John Quincy Adams. Still, both were highly intelligent, well-read, shrewd political operatives, who had developed great skill in managing difficult contemporaries and complex public issues and problems. They were also quick studies who learned from both successes and failures....
亚伯拉罕·林肯总统和国务卿威廉·亨利·苏厄德面临着他们这个年轻的、尚不长久的国家在外交政策上面临的最大挑战。随着南方的分裂和欧洲对内战的潜在干预,国家的生存岌岌可危。林肯总统和国务卿西沃德都无法夸耀他们的几位准备更充分的前任,如约翰·亚当斯、托马斯·杰斐逊、詹姆斯·麦迪逊或约翰·昆西·亚当斯的相关外交政策背景和经验。尽管如此,两人都是非常聪明、博览群书、精明的政治操纵者,在处理棘手的时局和复杂的公共事务和问题方面发展出了高超的技巧。他们学习很快,从成功和失败中学习....
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"J. A. Fry","doi":"10.5810/kentucky/9780813177120.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813177120.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"President Abraham Lincoln and Secretary of State William Henry Seward confronted the greatest foreign policy challenge of their young, and still impermanent, nation’s existence. With the South’s secession and potential European intervention in the Civil War, national survival was literally at stake. Neither President Lincoln nor Secretary of State Seward could boast of the relevant foreign policy background and experience of several of their better-prepared predecessors, such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, or John Quincy Adams. Still, both were highly intelligent, well-read, shrewd political operatives, who had developed great skill in managing difficult contemporaries and complex public issues and problems. They were also quick studies who learned from both successes and failures....","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115944600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Back Matter 回到问题
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.14
{"title":"Back Matter","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116970263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The First Perilous Year, 1861 危险的第一年(1861年
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.5
J. A. Fry
This chapter analyzes the bases and evolution of Lincoln and Seward’s personal friendship and professional partnership during the first year of the war. As Lincoln solidified his one-war policy and Seward implemented his purposeful bluster warning against European intervention in the American conflict, the two leaders responded to British and French recognition of the South’s status as a belligerent and instituted the North’s blockade of the Confederacy. Lincoln initiated his brilliant representation of the war’s international significance and assumed an increasingly active role as commander in chief, and Seward took the lead in the North’s decision to compromise and accept British demands in the dangerous Trent affair. All of this is set against British and French responses to the American war.
这一章分析了林肯和苏厄德在战争第一年的私人友谊和工作伙伴关系的基础和演变。当林肯巩固了他的一场战争政策,苏厄德实施了他对欧洲干预美国冲突的有目的的咆哮警告时,两位领导人对英国和法国承认南方作为交战国的地位做出了回应,并制定了北方对南部邦联的封锁。林肯开始了他对这场战争的国际意义的杰出表现,并作为总司令承担了越来越积极的角色,西沃德带头决定在危险的特伦特事件中妥协并接受英国的要求。所有这些都是针对英国和法国对美国战争的反应。
{"title":"The First Perilous Year, 1861","authors":"J. A. Fry","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.5","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes the bases and evolution of Lincoln and Seward’s personal friendship and professional partnership during the first year of the war. As Lincoln solidified his one-war policy and Seward implemented his purposeful bluster warning against European intervention in the American conflict, the two leaders responded to British and French recognition of the South’s status as a belligerent and instituted the North’s blockade of the Confederacy. Lincoln initiated his brilliant representation of the war’s international significance and assumed an increasingly active role as commander in chief, and Seward took the lead in the North’s decision to compromise and accept British demands in the dangerous Trent affair. All of this is set against British and French responses to the American war.","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134073491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE RECOGNITION AND CABINET CRISES, 1862 承认和内阁危机(1862年
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.6
J. A. Fry
This chapter focuses on Lincoln’s decision to reject calls for Seward’s replacement as secretary of state and on the two partners’ successful efforts to block European diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy and intervention in the American war. Seward skillfully managed maritime issues associated with the blockade, and Lincoln shifted the primary stated emphasis of US diplomacy from preserving the Union to freeing the slaves. This shift was embodied in the Emancipation Proclamation and linked northern victory to abolishing slavery. When combined with the Confederate retreat following the battle of Antietam and Seward’s ongoing threats, the North’s stand on the side of liberty ultimately convinced British leaders not to intervene or to recognize the South—making 1862 the war’s pivotal foreign policy year.
这一章的重点是林肯决定拒绝接替苏厄德担任国务卿的呼吁,以及这两个伙伴成功地阻止了欧洲在外交上承认南部邦联并干预美国战争。苏厄德巧妙地处理了与封锁有关的海上问题,林肯将美国外交的主要重点从维护联邦转移到解放奴隶上。这种转变体现在《解放奴隶宣言》中,并将北方的胜利与废除奴隶制联系起来。再加上安提特姆战役后邦联的撤退和苏厄德持续不断的威胁,北方站在自由一边的立场最终说服了英国领导人不干预或不承认南方,使1862年成为战争外交政策的关键一年。
{"title":"THE RECOGNITION AND CABINET CRISES, 1862","authors":"J. A. Fry","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.6","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on Lincoln’s decision to reject calls for Seward’s replacement as secretary of state and on the two partners’ successful efforts to block European diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy and intervention in the American war. Seward skillfully managed maritime issues associated with the blockade, and Lincoln shifted the primary stated emphasis of US diplomacy from preserving the Union to freeing the slaves. This shift was embodied in the Emancipation Proclamation and linked northern victory to abolishing slavery. When combined with the Confederate retreat following the battle of Antietam and Seward’s ongoing threats, the North’s stand on the side of liberty ultimately convinced British leaders not to intervene or to recognize the South—making 1862 the war’s pivotal foreign policy year.","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114208232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CONCLUSION 结论
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.9
{"title":"CONCLUSION","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117020892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
INDEX 指数
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.13
{"title":"INDEX","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.13","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123176617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Origins of the Foreign Policy Partnership, 1801–1861 外交政策伙伴关系的起源(1801-1861
Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.4
J. A. Fry
This chapter examines the genesis of the unlikely Lincoln-Seward foreign policy partnership. Attention is given to their respective childhoods and educational opportunities, marriages, family lives, and legal careers. Both men gravitated to politics and moved from the Whig to Republican Party in the 1850s. Despite Seward’s much greater political prominence and success, Lincoln was selected as the Republican nominee for president in 1860 and went on to win the general election. Lincoln then made Seward his secretary of state, established his status as senior partner, and instituted his one-war policy as the administration responded to the South’s secession from the Union.
本章考察了林肯和苏厄德之间不太可能的外交政策伙伴关系的起源。重点是他们各自的童年和教育机会、婚姻、家庭生活和法律职业。两人都投身于政治,并在19世纪50年代从辉格党转到共和党。尽管苏厄德的政治声望和成功要大得多,林肯还是在1860年被选为共和党总统候选人,并在大选中获胜。林肯随后任命苏厄德为国务卿,确立他作为高级合伙人的地位,并制定了他的一场战争政策,作为政府对南方脱离联邦的回应。
{"title":"Origins of the Foreign Policy Partnership, 1801–1861","authors":"J. A. Fry","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8kdz.4","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the genesis of the unlikely Lincoln-Seward foreign policy partnership. Attention is given to their respective childhoods and educational opportunities, marriages, family lives, and legal careers. Both men gravitated to politics and moved from the Whig to Republican Party in the 1850s. Despite Seward’s much greater political prominence and success, Lincoln was selected as the Republican nominee for president in 1860 and went on to win the general election. Lincoln then made Seward his secretary of state, established his status as senior partner, and instituted his one-war policy as the administration responded to the South’s secession from the Union.","PeriodicalId":346275,"journal":{"name":"Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125757560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lincoln, Seward, and US Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1