Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780804782111-001
{"title":"Acknowledgments","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780804782111-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804782111-001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124315867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780804782111-009
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780804782111-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804782111-009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"396 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121796054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780804782111-fm
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780804782111-fm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804782111-fm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121451669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.1515/9780804782111-008
Paul M. Butler
{"title":"Stop and Frisk: Sex, Torture, Control","authors":"Paul M. Butler","doi":"10.1515/9780804782111-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804782111-008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129035411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-01-24DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0003
Corey Brettschneider
A great deal of contemporary work on justifications of punishment has been pursued within the field of moral philosophy. Such inquires are typically concerned with the rightness or wrongness of punishment from the perspective of utilitarian or retributive moral theory, considered in isolation from the political question of legitimacy. In contrast to a broadly moral theory of punishment, a theory of punishment within the confines of political morality should address not only how those guilty of crimes deserve to be treated, but also the narrower question of which punishments the state rightly metes out. In this essay, I argue that we should turn to Rousseau as a guide in developing a theory of justifiable state punishment. Rousseau’s theory of the social contract, I suggest, demonstrates how a theory of political legitimacy might frame an account of punishment. Furthermore, I contend that Rousseau’s contractualism, while flawed, points the way forward for contemporary accounts of legitimate state punishment.
{"title":"Rights within the Social Contract: Rousseau on Punishment","authors":"Corey Brettschneider","doi":"10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"A great deal of contemporary work on justifications of punishment has been pursued within the field of moral philosophy. Such inquires are typically concerned with the rightness or wrongness of punishment from the perspective of utilitarian or retributive moral theory, considered in isolation from the political question of legitimacy. In contrast to a broadly moral theory of punishment, a theory of punishment within the confines of political morality should address not only how those guilty of crimes deserve to be treated, but also the narrower question of which punishments the state rightly metes out. In this essay, I argue that we should turn to Rousseau as a guide in developing a theory of justifiable state punishment. Rousseau’s theory of the social contract, I suggest, demonstrates how a theory of political legitimacy might frame an account of punishment. Furthermore, I contend that Rousseau’s contractualism, while flawed, points the way forward for contemporary accounts of legitimate state punishment.","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116507647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-08-29DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0005
S. Lee
{"title":"In the Prison of the Mind: Punishment, Social Order, and Self-Regulation","authors":"S. Lee","doi":"10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133413775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-08-29DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0004
Alec C. Ewald
This chapter explores collateral sanctions’ awkward straddle of punitive and regulatory aims. In showing that these restrictions do not fit clearly into either category, I demonstrate what I believe are the real dangers of that ambiguity. The harmful consequences of our massive, murky, ill-defined collateral-sanctions regime extend well beyond those directly affected, rendering citizens unable to judge the efficacy of such restrictions and undermining core commitments of the American political order. While I conclude that many such restrictions seem unlikely to fulfill their purported objectives, my core claim is not that collateral sanctions are necessarily bad policy – but instead that our confusion over their character and purpose actually keeps us from knowing how to judge them in the first place.I begin with a detailed account of current U.S. collateral-consequence policies. The second section explains the ambiguity surrounding collateral consequences’ blend of regulatory and punitive elements, and shows that collateral sanctions do not fit comfortably into any of the frameworks by which we understand criminal justice or regulatory policies. I close the chapter by arguing that collateral consequences represent a new manifestation of a virulent exclusionary tradition in American citizenship law.
{"title":"Collateral Consequences and the Perils of Categorical Ambiguity","authors":"Alec C. Ewald","doi":"10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804771702.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores collateral sanctions’ awkward straddle of punitive and regulatory aims. In showing that these restrictions do not fit clearly into either category, I demonstrate what I believe are the real dangers of that ambiguity. The harmful consequences of our massive, murky, ill-defined collateral-sanctions regime extend well beyond those directly affected, rendering citizens unable to judge the efficacy of such restrictions and undermining core commitments of the American political order. While I conclude that many such restrictions seem unlikely to fulfill their purported objectives, my core claim is not that collateral sanctions are necessarily bad policy – but instead that our confusion over their character and purpose actually keeps us from knowing how to judge them in the first place.I begin with a detailed account of current U.S. collateral-consequence policies. The second section explains the ambiguity surrounding collateral consequences’ blend of regulatory and punitive elements, and shows that collateral sanctions do not fit comfortably into any of the frameworks by which we understand criminal justice or regulatory policies. I close the chapter by arguing that collateral consequences represent a new manifestation of a virulent exclusionary tradition in American citizenship law.","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125077524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-08-29DOI: 10.11126/STANFORD/9780804771702.003.0001
Austin D. Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, M. Umphrey
{"title":"On the Blurred Boundary between Regulation and Punishment","authors":"Austin D. Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, M. Umphrey","doi":"10.11126/STANFORD/9780804771702.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11126/STANFORD/9780804771702.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":355906,"journal":{"name":"Law as Punishment / Law as Regulation","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131581450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：