Servant leadership focuses on the betterment and support of others by seeking to meet the interests, needs, and ambitions of others’ above one’s own. The following paper looks at philanthropy as a catalyst to drive servant leadership behaviors based on situational proximity. The findings of the case study suggest as an individual’s proximity or associativity to current or previous philanthropic event so will their willingness to help support others within similar situations and thus exhibit servant leadership principles.
{"title":"From Leader to Servant: A Case Approach to Applied Philanthropic Servant Leadership","authors":"Aeron Zentner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2771635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2771635","url":null,"abstract":"Servant leadership focuses on the betterment and support of others by seeking to meet the interests, needs, and ambitions of others’ above one’s own. The following paper looks at philanthropy as a catalyst to drive servant leadership behaviors based on situational proximity. The findings of the case study suggest as an individual’s proximity or associativity to current or previous philanthropic event so will their willingness to help support others within similar situations and thus exhibit servant leadership principles.","PeriodicalId":388469,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Strategic Leadership Models (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121160164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In international trade policy, leadership matters a lot, as it is most evident in the recent failure to complete the Doha round. However, there is a lack of efforts to update the theory of trade policy leadership, which mostly continues to be cast in the terms of Kindleberger’s classical theory of hegemonial leadership. This theory does not fit squarely with the new contexts of so-called ‘new trade policy issues’ (environment, standardization, intellectual property rights etc.). The paper develops a new approach based on recent advances in applying principles of Hegel’s philosophy on international relations. Reference to Hegel is a productive endeavour because many contributions to international trade law and institutions are grounded in Kantian views on international order and freedom. To render this philosophical perspective operational in economics, I relate it to Amartya Sen’s recent distinction between ‘transcendental institutionalism’ and ‘realization focused comparisons’ in institutional change, representing the Kantian and the Hegelian viewpoint, respectively; I argue that real-world trade policy is actually a process of ‘realization-focused comparisons’, for which I have coined the term ‘deliberative trade policy’. Then, Hegelian analytical categories such as ‘recognition’ and ‘civil society’ can be applied on analysing trade policy as a process of mutual exchange of market access rights embedded in a global civil society where governments are privileged, but not exclusively relevant actors. I describe the basic institutional structures and the resulting interaction patterns of deliberative trade policy. Against this background, I sketch the role of ‘ideational leadership’. My empirical workhorse is the recent trade policy controversies and unresolved issues in regulating international trade in genetically modified organisms and products in which issues of consumer concerns, radical uncertainty about future consequences of technological change, and regulatory externalities loom large.
{"title":"Leadership, Deliberative Trade Policy, and Civil Society: The Hegelian Approach","authors":"Carsten Herrmann-Pillath","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2361308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2361308","url":null,"abstract":"In international trade policy, leadership matters a lot, as it is most evident in the recent failure to complete the Doha round. However, there is a lack of efforts to update the theory of trade policy leadership, which mostly continues to be cast in the terms of Kindleberger’s classical theory of hegemonial leadership. This theory does not fit squarely with the new contexts of so-called ‘new trade policy issues’ (environment, standardization, intellectual property rights etc.). The paper develops a new approach based on recent advances in applying principles of Hegel’s philosophy on international relations. Reference to Hegel is a productive endeavour because many contributions to international trade law and institutions are grounded in Kantian views on international order and freedom. To render this philosophical perspective operational in economics, I relate it to Amartya Sen’s recent distinction between ‘transcendental institutionalism’ and ‘realization focused comparisons’ in institutional change, representing the Kantian and the Hegelian viewpoint, respectively; I argue that real-world trade policy is actually a process of ‘realization-focused comparisons’, for which I have coined the term ‘deliberative trade policy’. Then, Hegelian analytical categories such as ‘recognition’ and ‘civil society’ can be applied on analysing trade policy as a process of mutual exchange of market access rights embedded in a global civil society where governments are privileged, but not exclusively relevant actors. I describe the basic institutional structures and the resulting interaction patterns of deliberative trade policy. Against this background, I sketch the role of ‘ideational leadership’. My empirical workhorse is the recent trade policy controversies and unresolved issues in regulating international trade in genetically modified organisms and products in which issues of consumer concerns, radical uncertainty about future consequences of technological change, and regulatory externalities loom large.","PeriodicalId":388469,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Strategic Leadership Models (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130230248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Capitalism, though not perfect, has a long history of incremental gains and its flagship, the United States, is an icon for a functional financial system.
资本主义虽然并不完美，但它有着长期的渐进式收益历史，其旗舰美国是一个功能性金融体系的标志。
{"title":"Taxonomy of Finance Theories","authors":"Vernon T. Cox","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2050188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2050188","url":null,"abstract":"Capitalism, though not perfect, has a long history of incremental gains and its flagship, the United States, is an icon for a functional financial system.","PeriodicalId":388469,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Strategic Leadership Models (Topic)","volume":"397 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114002405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：