Background: Liver dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of mortality after cardiac interventions. The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4 index), a marker of hepatic fibrosis, has been associated with a worse prognosis in heart failure. The prognostic relevance of the index in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications associated with the FIB-4 index in patients undergoing TAVR.
Methods: Between May 2012 and June 2019, 941 patients undergoing TAVR were stratified into a low or high FIB-4 index group, based on a cutoff value that was determined according to a receiver operating characteristic curve predicting 1-year all-cause mortality.
Results: Patients with a high FIB-4 index (n = 480), based on the cutoff value of 1.82, showed higher rates of pulmonary hypertension (43.8% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.01), right-ventricular systolic dysfunction (29.5% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.01) and larger inferior vena cava diameter (1.6 ± 0.6 cm vs. 1.3 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.01) than patients with a low FIB-4 index (n = 461). Furthermore, a high FIB-4 index was associated with a significantly higher cumulative 1-year all-cause mortality (17.5% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.01) and non-cardiovascular mortality (12.1% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.01), compared to a low FIB-4 index. Multivariable analysis revealed that a high FIB-4 index was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.75 [95% CI: 1.18-2.59], p < 0.01).
Conclusions: A high FIB-4 index is associated with right-sided heart overload and an increased risk of mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. The FIB-4 index may be useful as an additional predictor of outcomes in these patients.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the workhorse of noninvasive cardiac imaging, allowing to easily obtain precise information on cardiac structure and function. Over time, Doppler interrogation of blood flow velocities, direction, and timing in several locations within the heart became the primary method for haemodynamic assessment, replacing cardiac catheterization in most clinical settings and providing valuable diagnostic and prognostic information on a wide spectrum of cardiac pathological processes. Abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, and intracardiac electrical conduction are commonly encountered during the performance of echocardiographic studies. Up to now, only a modest attention has been given to the impact of these abnormalities on the reading and interpretation of echocardiographic examination and this assessment has not yet been carried out in a global and systematic way. Tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias and atrioventricular conduction disturbances influence cardiac structure and mechanics as well as Doppler flow patterns. For this reason, and to be able to avoid misinterpretation, echocardiographers must be aware of the consequences of these common rhythm disturbances on echocardiographic findings. This narrative review aims to describe the current knowledge on this topic, focusing on the expected mechanical effects and Doppler patterns observed on transthoracic echocardiography in patients with common rhythm (tachycardia and bradycardia, atrial flutter and fibrillation and ectopic beats) and conduction disturbances (namely, atrioventricular block).
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) can cause acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) and valve replacement has been shown to lead to von Willebrand factor (vWF) recovery. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of AVWS in different severe AS phenotypes and its course after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Methods: 143 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI were included in the study. vWF function was assessed at baseline, 6 and 24 h after TAVI. AVWS was defined as a reduced vWF:Ac/Ag ratio ≤ 0.7. Phenotypes were classified by tricuspid (TAV) and bicuspid (BAV) valve morphology, mean transvalvular gradient (Pmean), stroke volume index (SVI), ejection fraction (EF) and indexed effective orifice area (iEOA).
Results: AVWS was present in 36 (25.2%) patients before TAVI. vWF:Ac/Ag ratio was significantly lower in high gradient compared to low-gradient severe AS [0.78 (IQR 0.67-0.86) vs. 0.83 (IQR 0.74-0.93), p < 0.05] and in patients with BAV compared to TAV [0.70 (IQR 0.63-0.78) vs. 0.81 (IQR 0.71-0.89), p < 0.05]. Normalization of vWF:Ac/Ag ratio was achieved in 61% patients 24 h after TAVI. As in the overall study cohort, vWF:Ac/Ag ratio increased significantly in all severe AS subgroups 6 h after TAVI (each p < 0.05). Regarding binary logistic regression analysis, BAV was the only significant predictor for AVWS.
Conclusions: BAV morphology is a strong predictor for AVWS in severe AS. TAVI restores vWF function in most patients with severe AS independently of AS phenotype and valve morphology.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has become more frequent in the last years. This may pose challenges for long-time valve durability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) with the newest-generation devices in BAV stenosis up to one-year follow-up (FU).
Methods: The primary endpoint was defined as the prevalence of BVD during the first procedural year according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Secondary endpoints were defined as failure in device success and clinical endpoints according to VARC-3.
Results: A total of 107 patients were included. Of these, 34 subjects (31.8%) met the criteria for BVD during a mean FU of 263 ± 180 days, of which 20.2% were already documented after thirty days. Device success after one year was lower in the + BVD cohort (57.6% vs. 98.7%, p < 0.0001*). The rates of structural valve deterioration were 6.5%, non-structural valve deterioration (NSVD) 17.8%, subclinical leaflet thickening 10.3%, and endocarditis 0.9%. NSVD was foremost triggered by patient prosthesis mismatch in balloon-expandable valves. Hemodynamic valve deterioration stage 1 and 2 was confirmed in 16.8% of + BVD patients, while stage 1 and 3 bioprosthetic valve failure occurred in 1.9%. There was no impact of BVD on mortality.
Conclusion: There is critical evidence of early BVD after TAVI in BAV during one-year FU in one-third of patients, also lowering device success. The most frequently observed bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was NSVD due to patient prosthesis mismatch following TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve.
Background: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an FDA-approved device therapy for patients with refractory systolic heart failure and normal QRS width. Randomized trials demonstrated benefits of CCM primarily for patients with severe heart failure (> NYHA class II).
Purpose: To better understand individualized indication in clinical practice, we compared the effect of CCM in patients with baseline NYHA class II vs. NYHA class III or ambulatory IV over the 5-year period in our large clinical registry (MAINTAINED Observational Study).
Methods: Changes in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), NT-proBNP level, and KDIGO chronic kidney disease stage were compared as functional parameters. In addition, mortality within 3 years was compared with the prediction of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic heart failure risk score.
Results: A total of 172 patients were included in the analyses (10% with NYHA class II). Only patients with NYHA class III/IV showed a significant improvement in NYHA class over 5 years of CCM (II: 0.1 ± 0.6; p = 0.96 vs. III/IV: - 0.6 ± 0.6; p < 0.0001). In both groups, LVEF improved significantly (II: 4.7 ± 8.3; p = 0.0072 vs. III/IV: 7.0 ± 10.7%; p < 0.0001), while TAPSE improved significantly only in NYHA class III/IV patients (II: 2.2 ± 1.6; p = 0.20 vs. III/IV: 1.8 ± 5.2 mm; p = 0.0397). LVEF improvement was comparable in both groups over 5 years of CCM (p = 0.83). NYHA class II patients had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels at baseline (858 [175/6887] vs. 2632 [17/28830] ng/L; p = 0.0044), which was offset under therapy (399 [323/1497] vs. 901 [13/18155] ng/L; p = 0.61). Actual 3-year mortality was 17 and 26% vs. a predicted mortality of 31 and 42%, respectively (p = 0.0038 for NYHA class III/IV patients).
Conclusions: NYHA class III/IV patients experienced more direct and extensive functional improvements with CCM and a survival benefit compared with the predicted risk. However, our data suggest that NYHA class II patients may also benefit from the sustained positive effects of LVEF improvement.
Objective: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are successfully used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias and prevent sudden cardiac death. However, they are also known to have a major psychological impact leading to higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in a substantial proportion of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of depressive symptoms in a large cohort of ICD carriers with a different clinical background and to compare prevalence and risk factors between patients with primary and secondary prophylactic indication for ICD implantation.
Methods: 315 out of 622 patients (50.6%), who regularly attended ICD assessments at the University Hospital Zurich completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI I-II) to estimate current depressive symptoms.
Results: Overall, depressive symptoms were common in ICD patients, with 20.3% of the patients showing clinically relevant depression (12.4% mild depressive symptoms, 6.0% moderate, 1.9% severe). Moderate to severe depressive symptoms seem to be more likely in patients with secondary prophylactic indication of the ICD as compared to a group of patients with primary prophylactic implantation. Patients that received more than 5 ICD shocks since implantation reveal more depressive symptoms than those with less events. Mean BDI Score in total (n = 315) was at 8.44 ± 7.56 without a statistically significant difference between the primary (M = 8.04 ± 7.10, n = 153) and secondary (M = 8.81 ± 7.98, n = 162) preventive group (p value = 0.362), even after adjustment for various clinical characteristics. ICD patients should therefore be well supported and advised concerning the psychological impact of their device and particular aspects of daily life concerns (e.g. physical activity), with a special focus on patients, who have received multiple shocks.
Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel near-physiological pacing method that still lacks quantitative criteria to guide the selection of lead-implanted sites to enhance the success likelihood of lead deployments. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the relationships of LBBP success likelihood to the distribution of lead-implanted sites and the lead-localization-pacing electrocardiographic (ECG) features.
Methods: All the lead-implanted sites in patients with finally successful LBBP were enrolled for analysis, including successful and failed sites. A novel coordinate system was invented to describe the sites' distribution as longitudinal distance (longit-dist) and lateral distance (lat-dist). Corrected distance parameters were generated to eliminate the cardiac dimension variations. The lead-localization-pacing ECG parameters were also collected, such as paced QRS duration (locat-QRSd), left ventricular activation time (locat-LVAT), LVAT/QRSd ratio (locat-LVAT/QRSd), and QRS directions.
Results: A total of 94 patients with 105 successful sites and 93 failed sites were enrolled. Longit-dist and corrected longit-dist of successful sites were significantly longer, while locat-QRSd and locat-LVAT were shorter and locat-LVAT/QRSd was lower than failed sites. There was a positive dose-response relationship between LBBP success likelihood and corrected longit-dist with a cut-off of 26.95 mm, whereas there were negative dose-response relationships of LBBP success likelihood to locat-QRSd, locat-LVAT, and locat-LVAT/QRSd with the cut-offs of 142 ms, 92 ms, and 64.7%, respectively. Downward QRS direction in II/III ECG leads was also associated with successful LBBP.
Conclusion: Longit-dist, locat-QRSd, locat-LVAT, and locat-LVAT/QRSd were quantitative parameters to guide the selection of lead-implanted sites during LBBP implantation. Quantitative distance and electrocardiographic parameters for lead-implanted site selection to enhance the success likelihood of left bundle branch pacing. LBBP, left bundle branch pacing; Longit-dist, longitudinal distance; CL-apex-dist, distance from contraction line to apex; LBBB, left bundle branch block; IVCD, intraventricular conduction delay; Locat-QRSd, lead-localization-pacing QRS duration; Locat-LVAT, lead-localization-pacing left ventricular activation time; Locat-LVAT/QRSd, lead-localization-pacing LVAT/QRSd ratio.
Background: Data on Device-related Thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for DRT from centers reporting to the EUROC-DRT registry.
Methods: We included 537 patients (112 with DRT and 425 without DRT) who had undergone LAAC between 12/2008 and 04/2019. Baseline and implantation characteristics, anti-thrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups in uni- and multivariate analyses. Additional propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to focus on the role of implantation characteristics.
Results: Patients with DRT showed higher rates of previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (49.1% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.01), spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (44.9% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.01) and lower left atrial appendage (LAA) peak emptying velocity (35.4 ± 18.5 vs. 42.4 ± 18.0 cm/s, p = 0.02). Occluders implanted in DRT patients were larger (25.5 ± 3.8 vs. 24.6 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.03) and implanted deeper in the LAA (mean depth: 7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 mm, p < 0.01). Coverage of the appendage ostium was achieved less often in DRT patients (69.5% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.01), while DRT patients were less frequently on oral anticoagulation (7.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, prior stroke/TIA and SEC as independent risk factors for DRT. After PSM, implantation depth was found to be predictive. Rates of stroke/TIA were higher in DRT patients (13.5% vs. 3.8%, Hazard Ratio: 4.21 [95%-confidence interval: 1.88-9.49], p < 0.01).
Conclusions: DRT after LAAC is associated with adverse outcome and appears to be of multifactorial origin, depending on patient characteristics, anticoagulation regimen and device position.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：