首页 > 最新文献

Gazing through the crystal ball: predicting outcomes from COVID-19最新文献

英文 中文
S72 Lung function outcomes in children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome – temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) 与SARS-CoV-2暂时性相关的小儿炎性多系统综合征(PIMS-TS)患儿肺功能结局
Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.78
M. Riley, C. Doughty, R. Brugha
S72 Table 1Table of lung function results expressed as mean and 95% CI = Confidence IntervalDemographic N= Mean (95% CI) Age (years) N= 30 11.73 (10.70, 12.77) Sex, Female% N=14 (48%) Height (cm) N=30 152.24 (145.62, 158.86) FeNO (ppb) N=26 16.28 (9.01, 23.55) FEV1%pred (%) N=29 103.85 (98.04, 109.66) FEV1 z-score N= 29 0.32 (0.00, 1.00) FVC%pred (%) N= 29 103.3 (98.25, 108.35) FVC z-score N= 29 0.25 (-0.15, 0.66) FEV1:FVC Ratio%pred (%) N= 29 98.84 (96.69, 100.99) FEV1:FVC Ratio z-score N=29 -0.09 (-0.41, 0.23) TLCO%pred N=23 86.69 (80.00, 93.39) TLCO z-score N=23 -1.04 (-1.70, -0.37) KCO%pred N=23 97.22 (91.34, 103.01) KCO z-score N=23 -0.22 (-0.65, 0.21) VA%pred N=23 88.87 (84.09, 93.65) VA z-score N=23 -1.01 (-1.44, -0.58) FRCpleth%pred (%) N=15 88.00 (80.99, 95.01) FRCpleth z-score N=15 -0.77 (-1.26, -0.28) TLC%pred (%) N=15 98.2 (92.17, 104.23) TLC z-score N=15 -0.15 (-0.66, 0.36) RV%pred (%) N=15 83.47 (71.34, 95.60) RV z-score N=15 -0.43 (-0.88, 0.02) ConclusionSimilar to other systemic inflammatory syndromes (Staphylococcal toxic shock, Kawasaki disease), and unlike Covid-19 in adults, it appears that children’s lungs are at low risk of long term damage by PIMS-TS. This data is preliminary and we have not assessed exercise tolerance, or outcomes in those with presentations that did not require initial respiratory support. Assessments are ongoing in this cohort and in children presenting following infection with new variants of concern.ReferencePenner, et al. 6-month multidisciplinary follow-up and outcomes of patients with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS-TS) at a UK tertiary paediatric hospital: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2021;5(7):473–482.
S72表1肺功能结果表用均值表示,95% CI =置信区间人口统计学N=均值(95% CI)年龄(岁)N=30 11.73(10.70, 12.77)性别、女性% N=14(48%)身高(cm) N=30 152.24 (145.62, 158.86) FeNO (ppb) N=26 16.28 (9.01, 23.55) FEV1%pred (%) N=29 103.85 (98.04, 109.66) FEV1 z-score N=29 0.32 (0.00, 1.00) FVC%pred (%) N=29 103.3 (98.25, 108.35) FVC z-score N=29 0.25 (-0.15, 0.66) FEV1:FVC Ratio%pred (%) N=29 98.84 (96.69,100.99) FEV1:FVC比值z-score N=29 -0.09 (-0.41, 0.23) TLCO%pred N=23 86.69 (80.00, 93.39) TLCO z-score N=23 -1.04 (-1.70, -0.37) KCO%pred N=23 97.22 (91.34, 103.01) KCO z-score N=23 -0.22 (-0.65, 103.01) VA%pred N=23 88.87 (-1.44, -0.58) FRCpleth%pred (%) N=15 88.00 (80.99, 95.01) FRCpleth z-score N=15 -0.77 (-1.26, -0.28) TLC%pred (%) N=15 98.2 (92.17, 104.23) TLC z-score N=15 -0.15 (-0.66, 0.36) RV%pred (%) N=15 83.47 (71.34),95.60) RV z-score N=15 -0.43(-0.88, 0.02)结论与其他系统性炎症综合征(葡萄球菌性中毒性休克、川崎病)相似,且与成人的Covid-19不同,PIMS-TS对儿童肺部的长期损害风险较低。这些数据是初步的,我们没有评估运动耐受性,也没有评估那些不需要初始呼吸支持的患者的结果。正在对该队列和感染后出现新变体的儿童进行评估。参考文献epenner等。英国一家三级儿科医院儿童炎症多系统综合征(PIMS-TS)患者6个月的多学科随访和结果:一项回顾性队列研究。柳叶刀儿童青少年健康2021;5(7):473-482。
{"title":"S72 Lung function outcomes in children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome – temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS)","authors":"M. Riley, C. Doughty, R. Brugha","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.78","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.78","url":null,"abstract":"S72 Table 1Table of lung function results expressed as mean and 95% CI = Confidence IntervalDemographic N= Mean (95% CI) Age (years) N= 30 11.73 (10.70, 12.77) Sex, Female% N=14 (48%) Height (cm) N=30 152.24 (145.62, 158.86) FeNO (ppb) N=26 16.28 (9.01, 23.55) FEV1%pred (%) N=29 103.85 (98.04, 109.66) FEV1 z-score N= 29 0.32 (0.00, 1.00) FVC%pred (%) N= 29 103.3 (98.25, 108.35) FVC z-score N= 29 0.25 (-0.15, 0.66) FEV1:FVC Ratio%pred (%) N= 29 98.84 (96.69, 100.99) FEV1:FVC Ratio z-score N=29 -0.09 (-0.41, 0.23) TLCO%pred N=23 86.69 (80.00, 93.39) TLCO z-score N=23 -1.04 (-1.70, -0.37) KCO%pred N=23 97.22 (91.34, 103.01) KCO z-score N=23 -0.22 (-0.65, 0.21) VA%pred N=23 88.87 (84.09, 93.65) VA z-score N=23 -1.01 (-1.44, -0.58) FRCpleth%pred (%) N=15 88.00 (80.99, 95.01) FRCpleth z-score N=15 -0.77 (-1.26, -0.28) TLC%pred (%) N=15 98.2 (92.17, 104.23) TLC z-score N=15 -0.15 (-0.66, 0.36) RV%pred (%) N=15 83.47 (71.34, 95.60) RV z-score N=15 -0.43 (-0.88, 0.02) ConclusionSimilar to other systemic inflammatory syndromes (Staphylococcal toxic shock, Kawasaki disease), and unlike Covid-19 in adults, it appears that children’s lungs are at low risk of long term damage by PIMS-TS. This data is preliminary and we have not assessed exercise tolerance, or outcomes in those with presentations that did not require initial respiratory support. Assessments are ongoing in this cohort and in children presenting following infection with new variants of concern.ReferencePenner, et al. 6-month multidisciplinary follow-up and outcomes of patients with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS-TS) at a UK tertiary paediatric hospital: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2021;5(7):473–482.","PeriodicalId":409571,"journal":{"name":"Gazing through the crystal ball: predicting outcomes from COVID-19","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115335569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
S69 Inflammatory biomarkers predict clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection: results from the PREDICT-COVID19 study 炎症生物标志物预测COVID-19感染患者的临床结局:来自predict - COVID-19研究的结果
Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.75
M. Long, H. Keir, Y. Giam, H. Abo Leyah, T. Pembridge, L. Delgado, R. Hull, A. Gilmour, C. Hughes, C. Hocking, B. New, D. Connell, H. Richardson, D. Cassidy, A. Shoemark, J. Chalmers
IntroductionCOVID-19 is reported to cause profound systemic inflammation. Anti-inflammatory treatments such as corticosteroids and anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies reduce mortality. Identifying inflammatory biomarkers associated with increased morbidity and mortality may allow both prediction of outcomes and identification of further therapeutic targets.MethodsA prospective observational study of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 admitted to a single centre in Dundee, UK. Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of hospital admission. 45 inflammatory biomarkers were measured in serum using the Olink Target48 proteomic-based biomarker panel. Additional markers were measured by ELISA/immunoassay and enzyme activity assays. Severe disease was defined as the requirement for non-invasive or mechanical ventilation or death within 28 days of admission. Discrimination between groups was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).Results176 patients were included (mean age 64.9 years, SD 13.6), 101 were male (57.4%). 56 patients developed severe disease (31.8%), mortality was 16.5%. Using ROC analysis, the strongest predictors of severity (p<0.0001) were CCL7/MCP3 (AUC 0.78 95%CI 0.70–0.85), IL6 (0.73 95%CI 0.66–0.81), IL15 (0.73 95%CI 0.65–0.81), CXCL10/IP10 (0.73 95%CI 0.65–0.81). Further significant predictors of severity included CXCL11, IL10, CCL2/MCP1 and CSF2/GM-CSF. Predictors of mortality were CXCL10 (0.78 95%CI 0.69–0.86), IL6 (0.76 95%CI 0.67–0.85), IL15 (0.75 95%CI 0.66–0.84), IL10 (0.73 95%CI 0.64–0.82). Further significant predictors of mortality were CXCL9 and CCL7.ConclusionMultiple circulating biomarkers were identified which predicted disease severity and mortality in COVID19, indicating clinical value in measurement upon hospital admission to highlight high-risk patients. Associated biological processes for these proteins included anti-viral and interferon responses and immune cell chemotaxis. In particular, CCL7 and CXCL10, the strongest predictors of severity and mortality in this dataset, are key players in the cytokine storm and immune cell recruitment linked with COVID19. These chemokines are not currently therapeutic targets, highlighting key avenues for further clinical research.
据报道,covid -19可引起深度全身性炎症。抗炎治疗如皮质类固醇和抗il -6受体单克隆抗体可降低死亡率。识别与发病率和死亡率增加相关的炎症生物标志物可以预测结果并确定进一步的治疗靶点。方法对英国邓迪单一中心收治的pcr确诊SARS-CoV-2患者进行前瞻性观察研究。患者在入院后96小时内入组。使用基于Olink Target48蛋白质组学的生物标志物面板测量血清中的45种炎症生物标志物。其他标记物采用ELISA/免疫测定法和酶活性测定法测定。重症定义为需要无创或机械通气或入院28天内死亡。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评价各组间的区别。结果共纳入176例患者,平均年龄64.9岁,SD 13.6,其中男性101例,占57.4%。重症56例(31.8%),死亡率16.5%。ROC分析显示,CCL7/MCP3 (AUC 0.78 95%CI 0.70-0.85)、IL6 (0.73 95%CI 0.66-0.81)、IL15 (0.73 95%CI 0.65-0.81)、CXCL10/IP10 (0.73 95%CI 0.65-0.81)是严重程度的最强预测因子(p<0.0001)。其他重要的严重程度预测因子包括CXCL11、IL10、CCL2/MCP1和CSF2/GM-CSF。死亡率预测因子为CXCL10 (0.78 95%CI 0.69-0.86)、IL6 (0.76 95%CI 0.67-0.85)、IL15 (0.75 95%CI 0.66-0.84)、IL10 (0.73 95%CI 0.64-0.82)。其他重要的死亡率预测因子是CXCL9和CCL7。结论发现了多种预测covid - 19疾病严重程度和死亡率的循环生物标志物,在入院时进行测量以突出高危患者具有临床价值。这些蛋白的相关生物学过程包括抗病毒和干扰素反应以及免疫细胞趋化性。特别是,CCL7和CXCL10是该数据集中最强的严重程度和死亡率预测因子,是与covid - 19相关的细胞因子风暴和免疫细胞募集的关键参与者。这些趋化因子目前还不是治疗靶点,这突出了进一步临床研究的关键途径。
{"title":"S69 Inflammatory biomarkers predict clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection: results from the PREDICT-COVID19 study","authors":"M. Long, H. Keir, Y. Giam, H. Abo Leyah, T. Pembridge, L. Delgado, R. Hull, A. Gilmour, C. Hughes, C. Hocking, B. New, D. Connell, H. Richardson, D. Cassidy, A. Shoemark, J. Chalmers","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.75","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.75","url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionCOVID-19 is reported to cause profound systemic inflammation. Anti-inflammatory treatments such as corticosteroids and anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies reduce mortality. Identifying inflammatory biomarkers associated with increased morbidity and mortality may allow both prediction of outcomes and identification of further therapeutic targets.MethodsA prospective observational study of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 admitted to a single centre in Dundee, UK. Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of hospital admission. 45 inflammatory biomarkers were measured in serum using the Olink Target48 proteomic-based biomarker panel. Additional markers were measured by ELISA/immunoassay and enzyme activity assays. Severe disease was defined as the requirement for non-invasive or mechanical ventilation or death within 28 days of admission. Discrimination between groups was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).Results176 patients were included (mean age 64.9 years, SD 13.6), 101 were male (57.4%). 56 patients developed severe disease (31.8%), mortality was 16.5%. Using ROC analysis, the strongest predictors of severity (p<0.0001) were CCL7/MCP3 (AUC 0.78 95%CI 0.70–0.85), IL6 (0.73 95%CI 0.66–0.81), IL15 (0.73 95%CI 0.65–0.81), CXCL10/IP10 (0.73 95%CI 0.65–0.81). Further significant predictors of severity included CXCL11, IL10, CCL2/MCP1 and CSF2/GM-CSF. Predictors of mortality were CXCL10 (0.78 95%CI 0.69–0.86), IL6 (0.76 95%CI 0.67–0.85), IL15 (0.75 95%CI 0.66–0.84), IL10 (0.73 95%CI 0.64–0.82). Further significant predictors of mortality were CXCL9 and CCL7.ConclusionMultiple circulating biomarkers were identified which predicted disease severity and mortality in COVID19, indicating clinical value in measurement upon hospital admission to highlight high-risk patients. Associated biological processes for these proteins included anti-viral and interferon responses and immune cell chemotaxis. In particular, CCL7 and CXCL10, the strongest predictors of severity and mortality in this dataset, are key players in the cytokine storm and immune cell recruitment linked with COVID19. These chemokines are not currently therapeutic targets, highlighting key avenues for further clinical research.","PeriodicalId":409571,"journal":{"name":"Gazing through the crystal ball: predicting outcomes from COVID-19","volume":"9 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113990439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
S71 A retrospective analysis of ROX score for predicting treatment failure and progression to invasive ventilation in COVID patients requiring enhanced respiratory support ROX评分预测需要加强呼吸支持的COVID患者治疗失败和有创通气进展的回顾性分析
Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.77
D. Ritchie, S. Fairbairn
S71 Table 1 ROX<3.85 ROX3.85–4.87 ROI RR ROI RR CPAP 87.5% 7 (95%CI 1.1–44.6 P0.019) 66.6% 5.33 (95%CI 0.78- 36.3 P0.043) HFNO 87.5% 9.63 (95%CI 1.45- 63.92 P0.009) 33.3% 3.66 (95%CI 0.48- 29.48 P0.11) ConclusionOur study suggests ROX score is valid in predicting intubation in COVID patients requiring enhanced respiratory support. Given the small sample size, further research utilising data from multiple sites would be useful to corroborate findings
表1 ROX<3.85 ROX3.85-4.87 ROI RR ROI RR CPAP 87.5% 7 (95%CI 1.1-44.6 P0.019) 66.6% 5.33 (95%CI 0.78- 36.3 P0.043) HFNO 87.5% 9.63 (95%CI 1.45- 63.92 P0.009) 33.3% 3.66 (95%CI 0.48- 29.48 P0.11)结论本研究提示ROX评分可有效预测需要加强呼吸支持的COVID患者插管。鉴于样本量小,利用多个地点的数据进行进一步研究将有助于证实研究结果
{"title":"S71 A retrospective analysis of ROX score for predicting treatment failure and progression to invasive ventilation in COVID patients requiring enhanced respiratory support","authors":"D. Ritchie, S. Fairbairn","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.77","url":null,"abstract":"S71 Table 1 ROX<3.85 ROX3.85–4.87 ROI RR ROI RR CPAP 87.5% 7 (95%CI 1.1–44.6 P0.019) 66.6% 5.33 (95%CI 0.78- 36.3 P0.043) HFNO 87.5% 9.63 (95%CI 1.45- 63.92 P0.009) 33.3% 3.66 (95%CI 0.48- 29.48 P0.11) ConclusionOur study suggests ROX score is valid in predicting intubation in COVID patients requiring enhanced respiratory support. Given the small sample size, further research utilising data from multiple sites would be useful to corroborate findings","PeriodicalId":409571,"journal":{"name":"Gazing through the crystal ball: predicting outcomes from COVID-19","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124076515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
S68 National COVID point of care lung ultrasound evaluation (society for acute medicine with the intensive care society) S68全国COVID监护点肺部超声评价(急症医学学会与重症监护学会)
Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.74
T. Knight, P. Parulekar, G. Rudge, F. Lesser, M. Dachsel, A. Aujayeb, D. Lasserson, N. Smallwood
{"title":"S68 National COVID point of care lung ultrasound evaluation (society for acute medicine with the intensive care society)","authors":"T. Knight, P. Parulekar, G. Rudge, F. Lesser, M. Dachsel, A. Aujayeb, D. Lasserson, N. Smallwood","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.74","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.74","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":409571,"journal":{"name":"Gazing through the crystal ball: predicting outcomes from COVID-19","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116246174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Gazing through the crystal ball: predicting outcomes from COVID-19
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1