Dragana Radicic, Geoff T. Pugh, Hugo Hollanders, René Wintjes
This study investigates the impact of innovation support programmes on SME innovation in traditional manufacturing industries in seven EU regions. Recent literature identifying sources of potential government failure in innovation policy suggests that the effects of public support measures to increase private innovation may be disappointing. Our results are consistent with this hypothesis, yet also suggest a direction for policy reform to overcome government failure and, thereby, to increase the potential additionality of innovation support programmes. Innovation support programmes in the EU typically adopt a "cream skimming" selection strategy: namely, programme managers systematically select firms on the basis of observable characteristics conducive to innovation. The econometric analysis of a new survey database reported in this paper suggests that "cream skimming" leads to firms being selected for programme participation that benefit less than would randomly selected firms. The policy corollary is that, subject to due diligence checking, allocation of innovation support by lottery should give rise to greater programme additionality than does the prevalent "cream skimming" approach. We conclude with some practical guidelines for allocation by lottery, which were developed for a recently launched innovation support programme for SMEs.
{"title":"The Impact of Innovation Support Programmes on SME Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing Industries: An Evaluation for Seven EU Regions","authors":"Dragana Radicic, Geoff T. Pugh, Hugo Hollanders, René Wintjes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2438459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2438459","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact of innovation support programmes on SME innovation in traditional manufacturing industries in seven EU regions. Recent literature identifying sources of potential government failure in innovation policy suggests that the effects of public support measures to increase private innovation may be disappointing. Our results are consistent with this hypothesis, yet also suggest a direction for policy reform to overcome government failure and, thereby, to increase the potential additionality of innovation support programmes. Innovation support programmes in the EU typically adopt a \"cream skimming\" selection strategy: namely, programme managers systematically select firms on the basis of observable characteristics conducive to innovation. The econometric analysis of a new survey database reported in this paper suggests that \"cream skimming\" leads to firms being selected for programme participation that benefit less than would randomly selected firms. The policy corollary is that, subject to due diligence checking, allocation of innovation support by lottery should give rise to greater programme additionality than does the prevalent \"cream skimming\" approach. We conclude with some practical guidelines for allocation by lottery, which were developed for a recently launched innovation support programme for SMEs.","PeriodicalId":428131,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: International (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115541328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patent data provide a rich set of information which can be used for comparative studies and trend analysis. The paper presents a systematic overview of the most appropriate tools methodologies that are available for determining the technological specialization of countries. Such analysis includes a discussion of databases, approaches, and indexes appropriate for this kind of analysis. This paper discusses different indicators of technological specialisation, concentration, and patent quality are analysed, including Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) index, patent share, C20 concentration index, and Gini concentration index. the main available patent databases, especially those with open access, and summarizes arguments for the study of technological specialisation based on assignee and inventor patent data. Also the limits and potentials of the statistics on resident / nonresident patenting on internal and external markets are discussed in the paper.
{"title":"Statistical Patent Analysis Indicators as a Means of Determining Country Technological Specialisation","authors":"E. Khramova, D. Meissner, G. Sagieva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2247936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2247936","url":null,"abstract":"Patent data provide a rich set of information which can be used for comparative studies and trend analysis. The paper presents a systematic overview of the most appropriate tools methodologies that are available for determining the technological specialization of countries. Such analysis includes a discussion of databases, approaches, and indexes appropriate for this kind of analysis. This paper discusses different indicators of technological specialisation, concentration, and patent quality are analysed, including Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) index, patent share, C20 concentration index, and Gini concentration index. the main available patent databases, especially those with open access, and summarizes arguments for the study of technological specialisation based on assignee and inventor patent data. Also the limits and potentials of the statistics on resident / nonresident patenting on internal and external markets are discussed in the paper.","PeriodicalId":428131,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: International (Sub-Topic)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132267937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
{"title":"Measuring Entrepreneurship: A Collection of Indicators, 2009 Edition","authors":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1581491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1581491","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":428131,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: International (Sub-Topic)","volume":"27 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114012761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Harnessing the economic opportunities of digital technologies often requires changes in policy and regulation. Domestic regulation and policy-making alone are unable to deal with the multilevel interactions that take place in the governance of digital technologies. In an era of unprecedented levels of interdependence, measures that regulate the global digital economy at the regional and at the international levels are fundamentally important. Despite the growing need for international cooperation in technology policy-making, global governance is falling short of their tasks. In particular, multilateral institutions and formal mechanisms of coordination are not representative of the interests and policy priorities of low- and middle-income countries. Drawing on the findings of a recent study, this essay seeks to understand the relative importance of international coordination in technology policy in developing countries. In doing so, it addresses how low- and middle-income countries can design and adopt much-needed digital regulation while rethinking the international dynamics that shape domestic and cross-border technology policy-making.
{"title":"Governing a Globalized Digital Economy: How to Make Technology Policy and Regulation Work for Developing Countries","authors":"B. Kira","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679406","url":null,"abstract":"Harnessing the economic opportunities of digital technologies often requires changes in policy and regulation. Domestic regulation and policy-making alone are unable to deal with the multilevel interactions that take place in the governance of digital technologies. In an era of unprecedented levels of interdependence, measures that regulate the global digital economy at the regional and at the international levels are fundamentally important. Despite the growing need for international cooperation in technology policy-making, global governance is falling short of their tasks. In particular, multilateral institutions and formal mechanisms of coordination are not representative of the interests and policy priorities of low- and middle-income countries. Drawing on the findings of a recent study, this essay seeks to understand the relative importance of international coordination in technology policy in developing countries. In doing so, it addresses how low- and middle-income countries can design and adopt much-needed digital regulation while rethinking the international dynamics that shape domestic and cross-border technology policy-making.","PeriodicalId":428131,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: International (Sub-Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133330442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：