A major pre-award administrative challenge research universities face is turnaround time for generation of high-quality NIH Data Training Tables for NIH training grants (e.g., T32, K12, TL1, KL2, R25s) which are required for training grant submission proposals to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Universities with dedicated training grant submission offices generally require data preparation following a structured timeline of several months in advance of the grant submission due date, while other universities with less or no dedicated support for training grant submissions use an ad hoc approach. In these cases, department or program administrators may collect the data manually, in Excel or REDCap, or similar manually maintained methods for those tables requested by the specific NIH grant announcement for the relevant participating graduate predoctoral and/or postdoctoral (including clinical) training programs across the university, depending on the training focus and the "participating faculty" provided by the proposed program director (PD/PI) for the grant. We describe an efficient "federated" method of data collection and construction for NIH Tables (2, 4, 5A/B, 6A/B & -8A part III/8C part III) for new and renewal applications by combining the use of REDCap and NIH xTRACT, leveraging the strengths of each.
{"title":"A METHOD FOR CREATING NIH DATA TRAINING TABLES WITH REDCAP AND NIH XTRACT.","authors":"John E Kerrigan, Sally Lu","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A major pre-award administrative challenge research universities face is turnaround time for generation of high-quality NIH Data Training Tables for NIH training grants (e.g., T32, K12, TL1, KL2, R25s) which are required for training grant submission proposals to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Universities with dedicated training grant submission offices generally require data preparation following a structured timeline of several months in advance of the grant submission due date, while other universities with less or no dedicated support for training grant submissions use an ad hoc approach. In these cases, department or program administrators may collect the data manually, in Excel or REDCap, or similar manually maintained methods for those tables requested by the specific NIH grant announcement for the relevant participating graduate predoctoral and/or postdoctoral (including clinical) training programs across the university, depending on the training focus and the \"participating faculty\" provided by the proposed program director (PD/PI) for the grant. We describe an efficient \"federated\" method of data collection and construction for NIH Tables (2, 4, 5A/B, 6A/B & -8A part III/8C part III) for new and renewal applications by combining the use of REDCap and NIH xTRACT, leveraging the strengths of each.</p>","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"55 1","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bindu Achamma Koshy, Muthulakshmi R, Rameena K A, Sinija A S
{"title":"SUSTAINABLE REPORTING FOR A RESILIENT, RESPONSIBLE AND RELIABLE FUTURE: CASE OF INFOSYS","authors":"Bindu Achamma Koshy, Muthulakshmi R, Rameena K A, Sinija A S","doi":"10.53555/jra.v5i2.825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53555/jra.v5i2.825","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"70 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138983866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dr.Pankaj Rahi, D. Bandil, Dr. Savita Shiwani, Pratibha Soni, Vivek Saxena
{"title":"OPTIMIZED ACCESS-CONTROL FRAMEWORK FOR REVITALIZING THE SECURITY OF PATIENT-CENTRIC ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS","authors":"Dr.Pankaj Rahi, D. Bandil, Dr. Savita Shiwani, Pratibha Soni, Vivek Saxena","doi":"10.53555/jra.v5.i2.513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53555/jra.v5.i2.513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139238558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica D Hanson, Adam Livengood, Cara Kulbacki-Fabisiak, Kory Hardcastle, Dedra Buchwald, Michael McDonell
Background: Pilot project programs offer early-stage and other investigators support to pursue emerging research areas, explore new methodologies, gain experience as principal investigators, and collect pilot data needed to pursue larger extramural research funding, such as from the National Institutes of Health. Pilot project programs may be particularly important to early-stage investigators from underrepresented backgrounds, who must overcome unique challenges to launching careers in community-based participatory research. This paper describes the structure, function, and impact of the Native Center for Alcohol Research and Education (NCARE) Pilot Project Core.
Methods: During four calls for applications from 2018 to 2021, research investigators interested in conducting alcohol use disorder research in partnership with Tribal communities were recruited, with a focus on early-stage and American Indian and Alaska Native investigators. Eligible investigators were required to submit letters of intent prior to preparing full applications, which underwent a rigorous review process.
Results: Eight pilot projects were awarded. Of the eight pilot project investigators, seven were early-stage scholars, seven were female, and four identified as American Indian or Alaska Native. The funded projects included two primary areas of research, epidemiological studies and intervention projects. Once funded, the Pilot Project Core assisted pilot project investigators with securing approvals for their research studies, responding to methodological and analysis questions, and mentoring and monitoring of their progress. At the time of writing this paper, three pilot project investigators have completed their pilot projects, three investigators are currently collecting data, and one is in the analysis phase. One pilot project investigator did not complete their project due to COVID-19 restrictions early in the pandemic. The pilot project investigators submitted 36 grant proposals for independent external funding and received 25 grants after funding of their pilot project; four were directly related to pilot project grants. Additionally, four peer-reviewed manuscripts resulting from Pilot Project Core support were published.
Conclusions: Despite challenges related to COVID-19 pandemic the pilot project funding through NCARE provided eight pilot grants, half of which identified as AI/AN and most of which led directly to multiple grants and papers. The NCARE pilot program provides a model for other similar programs seeking to support early-stage investigators who identify as AI/AN or other groups underrepresented in science.
{"title":"Implementation of a Pilot Project Program to Expand Research on Alcohol Use Disorders in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.","authors":"Jessica D Hanson, Adam Livengood, Cara Kulbacki-Fabisiak, Kory Hardcastle, Dedra Buchwald, Michael McDonell","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pilot project programs offer early-stage and other investigators support to pursue emerging research areas, explore new methodologies, gain experience as principal investigators, and collect pilot data needed to pursue larger extramural research funding, such as from the National Institutes of Health. Pilot project programs may be particularly important to early-stage investigators from underrepresented backgrounds, who must overcome unique challenges to launching careers in community-based participatory research. This paper describes the structure, function, and impact of the Native Center for Alcohol Research and Education (NCARE) Pilot Project Core.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During four calls for applications from 2018 to 2021, research investigators interested in conducting alcohol use disorder research in partnership with Tribal communities were recruited, with a focus on early-stage and American Indian and Alaska Native investigators. Eligible investigators were required to submit letters of intent prior to preparing full applications, which underwent a rigorous review process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight pilot projects were awarded. Of the eight pilot project investigators, seven were early-stage scholars, seven were female, and four identified as American Indian or Alaska Native. The funded projects included two primary areas of research, epidemiological studies and intervention projects. Once funded, the Pilot Project Core assisted pilot project investigators with securing approvals for their research studies, responding to methodological and analysis questions, and mentoring and monitoring of their progress. At the time of writing this paper, three pilot project investigators have completed their pilot projects, three investigators are currently collecting data, and one is in the analysis phase. One pilot project investigator did not complete their project due to COVID-19 restrictions early in the pandemic. The pilot project investigators submitted 36 grant proposals for independent external funding and received 25 grants after funding of their pilot project; four were directly related to pilot project grants. Additionally, four peer-reviewed manuscripts resulting from Pilot Project Core support were published.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite challenges related to COVID-19 pandemic the pilot project funding through NCARE provided eight pilot grants, half of which identified as AI/AN and most of which led directly to multiple grants and papers. The NCARE pilot program provides a model for other similar programs seeking to support early-stage investigators who identify as AI/AN or other groups underrepresented in science.</p>","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"54 3","pages":"82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466357/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. R. Carter, D. Delahanty, J. E. Strasser, Alicia J. Knoedler, G. Wilson, R. Davis, Don Engel
Sharing research equipment and personnel across investigators and laboratories has a long-standing history within research universities. However, the coordinated management of centralized, shared resources (i.e., core facilities) that provide access to instruments, technologies, services, expert consultation, and/or other scienti c and clinical capabilities by Chief Research O cers (CROs) represents a more recent shi within the academy. While a number of recent surveys and studies have focused on the experiences of core facility directors and users, there has not yet been a targeted survey of CROs. Partnering with the Association for Public and Land Grant Universities Council on Research, yeight CROs (or their designee) om research universities completed an electronic survey on core facilities (response rate = 35%). Core facilities formally reported to a range of entities within the university (and many to multiple entities), including the CRO o ce (83%), colleges/schools (67%), institutes/centers (42%), and departments (42%). Forty percent of respondents indicated that their university does not have a formal process to become and/or retain status as a recognized core facility. CROs also perceived that di erent types of core facilities directors di ered in their general e ectiveness (F(3,179)=6.88, p<.001); professional sta and administrators were rated as signi cantly more e ective at directing/ Carter, Delahanty, Strasser, Knoedler, Wilson, Davis, Engel
{"title":"Operational and Fiscal Management of Core Facilities: A Survey of Chief Research Officers","authors":"J. R. Carter, D. Delahanty, J. E. Strasser, Alicia J. Knoedler, G. Wilson, R. Davis, Don Engel","doi":"10.13016/M2BCBE-QT5G","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13016/M2BCBE-QT5G","url":null,"abstract":"Sharing research equipment and personnel across investigators and laboratories has a long-standing history within research universities. However, the coordinated management of centralized, shared resources (i.e., core facilities) that provide access to instruments, technologies, services, expert consultation, and/or other scienti c and clinical capabilities by Chief Research O cers (CROs) represents a more recent shi within the academy. While a number of recent surveys and studies have focused on the experiences of core facility directors and users, there has not yet been a targeted survey of CROs. Partnering with the Association for Public and Land Grant Universities Council on Research, yeight CROs (or their designee) om research universities completed an electronic survey on core facilities (response rate = 35%). Core facilities formally reported to a range of entities within the university (and many to multiple entities), including the CRO o ce (83%), colleges/schools (67%), institutes/centers (42%), and departments (42%). Forty percent of respondents indicated that their university does not have a formal process to become and/or retain status as a recognized core facility. CROs also perceived that di erent types of core facilities directors di ered in their general e ectiveness (F(3,179)=6.88, p<.001); professional sta and administrators were rated as signi cantly more e ective at directing/ Carter, Delahanty, Strasser, Knoedler, Wilson, Davis, Engel","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"50 1","pages":"14-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43120514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
When I was an undergraduate, one of my favorite pieces of literature was The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien. When the trilogy was cinematized these last years, I was delighted. Both the texts of the trilogy and the films are wonderfully creative. They are filled with exploits of heroes that capture our love of all things victorious. There are the lessons that are played out about human friendship for those who are members of The Fellowship of the Ring. There is the courage of battle against the forces of evil and destruction. There is the warmth of human care. There are tears of memory and smiles of camaraderie. Equally, there are the seething images of domination, power, and the corruption-of-self in the lustful preoccupation with The One Ring To Rule Them All. Tolkien's work is so popular because it is a mirror of the base rhythms of what it means to be human. In the end, such is the measure of what makes for monumentally significant literature and art. In the film version of Part III, The Return of the King, there is the final scene when elves and wizards, when Frodo and Bilbo, take their leave so that a New Age can dawn for all the citizens of Middle Earth. In the film Annie Lennox captures exquisitely well the poignant sensitivity and ambivalence of Frodo's leaving Sam and Merry and Pippin in her sung ballad, Into The West. That ballad speaks to us all. Nothing is forever. Change is a constant. Though they must inevitably give way to new adventures, we can never discount or deny the journeys that friends have had with one another. Indeed, Annie Lennox sings so well that, though "all souls pass," we indeed will meet again. All things change. Nothing lasts forever. In January 2013, my service as Editor of the Journal of Research Administration will come to an end after seven years. At that time, Dr. Timothy Atkinson will become the new Editor. I am delighted with his appointment and feel absolutely confident that he will bring the Journal into even newer heights of success and prominence. However, permit me to reflect at this time about my own tenure. Since January 2006, we have known extraordinary success. The Journal has, in a sense, been re-imagined--perhaps even re-invented! We have had unprecedented numbers of submissions in wide and diverse interdisciplinary subject areas related to our profession and all its arts and sciences. We have become indexed in several prestigious resources. The Journal Editorial Board established in these past years a completely de novo four-stage publication mentoring process that has never existed anywhere. Its formation is the subject of the special feature article in this edition. Indeed, this four-stage process of author-mentoring is a gift that the Journal has given to SRA--and that SRA has given to the world! The Journal has indeed become a major success for the academy of our entire profession. …
当我还是个大学生的时候,我最喜欢的文学作品之一是J.R.R.托尔金的《指环王》。当三部曲在最近几年被拍成电影时,我很高兴。三部曲的文本和电影都非常有创意。他们充满了英雄的事迹,抓住了我们对一切胜利的热爱。对于那些指环军团的成员来说,人类的友谊是值得学习的。有反抗邪恶和破坏力量的勇气。有人类关怀的温暖。有回忆的泪水,也有友情的微笑。同样的,在对魔戒的贪欲中,也有关于统治、权力和自我堕落的激动人心的形象。托尔金的作品如此受欢迎,是因为它反映了人类的基本节奏。最后,这就是衡量文学和艺术具有纪念意义的标准。在电影版的第三部《王者归来》中,最后一幕是精灵和巫师,佛罗多和比尔博离开,为中土世界的所有公民开启一个新时代。影片中,安妮·伦诺克斯在她的民谣《西行》中,细腻地捕捉到了佛罗多离开山姆、梅里和皮平时的尖锐敏感和矛盾心理。那首歌谣对我们大家都有意义。没有什么是永恒的。变化是永恒的。虽然他们必须不可避免地让位给新的冒险,但我们永远不能贬低或否认朋友之间的旅程。的确,安妮·伦诺克斯唱得很好,尽管“所有的灵魂都会逝去”,但我们确实会再次相遇。一切都在变化。没有什么是永恒的。2013年1月,我在《研究管理杂志》(Journal of Research Administration)的编辑职位将结束7年的任期。届时,蒂莫西·阿特金森博士将成为新的编辑。我对他的任命感到高兴,并坚信他将带领《华尔街日报》取得更大的成功和声望。然而,请允许我在这个时候反思一下我自己的任期。自2006年1月以来,我们取得了非凡的成功。从某种意义上说,《华尔街日报》被重新想象了——甚至可能被重新发明了!在与我们的专业及其所有艺术和科学相关的广泛和多样化的跨学科学科领域,我们收到了前所未有的数量。我们已经被几个著名的资源收录。《华尔街日报》编辑委员会在过去几年里建立了一个全新的四阶段出版指导流程,这在任何地方都从未存在过。它的形成是本期专题文章的主题。事实上,这个作者指导的四阶段过程是《华尔街日报》送给SRA的礼物——也是SRA送给世界的礼物!《华尔街日报》确实成为了我们整个专业学术界的一大成功。…
{"title":"Into the Future","authors":"Edward F. Gabriele","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv6wgmh8.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv6wgmh8.12","url":null,"abstract":"When I was an undergraduate, one of my favorite pieces of literature was The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien. When the trilogy was cinematized these last years, I was delighted. Both the texts of the trilogy and the films are wonderfully creative. They are filled with exploits of heroes that capture our love of all things victorious. There are the lessons that are played out about human friendship for those who are members of The Fellowship of the Ring. There is the courage of battle against the forces of evil and destruction. There is the warmth of human care. There are tears of memory and smiles of camaraderie. Equally, there are the seething images of domination, power, and the corruption-of-self in the lustful preoccupation with The One Ring To Rule Them All. Tolkien's work is so popular because it is a mirror of the base rhythms of what it means to be human. In the end, such is the measure of what makes for monumentally significant literature and art. In the film version of Part III, The Return of the King, there is the final scene when elves and wizards, when Frodo and Bilbo, take their leave so that a New Age can dawn for all the citizens of Middle Earth. In the film Annie Lennox captures exquisitely well the poignant sensitivity and ambivalence of Frodo's leaving Sam and Merry and Pippin in her sung ballad, Into The West. That ballad speaks to us all. Nothing is forever. Change is a constant. Though they must inevitably give way to new adventures, we can never discount or deny the journeys that friends have had with one another. Indeed, Annie Lennox sings so well that, though \"all souls pass,\" we indeed will meet again. All things change. Nothing lasts forever. In January 2013, my service as Editor of the Journal of Research Administration will come to an end after seven years. At that time, Dr. Timothy Atkinson will become the new Editor. I am delighted with his appointment and feel absolutely confident that he will bring the Journal into even newer heights of success and prominence. However, permit me to reflect at this time about my own tenure. Since January 2006, we have known extraordinary success. The Journal has, in a sense, been re-imagined--perhaps even re-invented! We have had unprecedented numbers of submissions in wide and diverse interdisciplinary subject areas related to our profession and all its arts and sciences. We have become indexed in several prestigious resources. The Journal Editorial Board established in these past years a completely de novo four-stage publication mentoring process that has never existed anywhere. Its formation is the subject of the special feature article in this edition. Indeed, this four-stage process of author-mentoring is a gift that the Journal has given to SRA--and that SRA has given to the world! The Journal has indeed become a major success for the academy of our entire profession. …","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"43 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2012-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68823800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-01-01DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511536021.003
P. Gaffney
Abstract This commentary article contends that the American research university is one of the great achievements of the 20th century, and that U.S. research universities have contributed powerfully to the nation's prosperity, security and intellectual vitality. The author asserts that research universities and industry possess different but complementary strengths and should work in close partnership so that the nation and the world can enjoy the greatest possible benefit. The author concludes with a plea to the members of the Society of Research Administrators to continue to make the public case for a robust and well-supported national research program. The article is based on the author's speech to the Society of Research Administrators on the occasion of his receipt of the 1999 Distinguished Contribution to Research Administration Award, delivered in Denver at the SRA Annual Conference, Oct. 18, 1999. Introduction I sometimes get the feeling that research administration, at least at the level I unaccountably find myself, is nine-tenths smoke and mirrors. Spectacular stuff happens, and even our most beady-eyed critics believe that we research administrators have had something to do with it. This in no way minimizes the great service to America provided by the member institutions and individual members of the Society of Research Administrators (SRA). You are stewards of one of the scarcest resources in education: research dollars (private, state and federal). You find ways to decrease the cost of doing business, stretch the research dollar and encourage the research process, without driving up research administrative overhead. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) has collaborated with universities in the conduct of research and related business affairs for longer that most of you have been alive. We in ONR cherish this relationship, and the success we enjoy is in large part due to people like you. You are active, effective, persistent and even, at times, aggressive spokespeople. You serve as lobbyists, ambassadors, marketers, representatives, emissaries and (too often) lonely advocates for investment in research. I can empathize since I do that too, and it is hard work. It is relentless, and it does not always pay off, but it is critical to your institutions' mission and mine. If you will allow a patriotic moment, you contribute here-as you have for decades-to the economic and security strength of the most prosperous nation on earth. For that too, I salute you. The Ascendance of the American Research University We have reached the end of a decade, a century and a millennium, and a jubilee year is upon us. It is therefore appropriate to reflect on the richness of life and the progress we have made as a people. Indulge me as I list some of the accomplishments of the past few years: * The enemy of our lifetime, the U.S.S.R., is gone, replaced by a more democratic, market-based Russia. * We have, one-by-one, overcome many diseases, thereby increasing
{"title":"Challenge and Response","authors":"P. Gaffney","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511536021.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511536021.003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This commentary article contends that the American research university is one of the great achievements of the 20th century, and that U.S. research universities have contributed powerfully to the nation's prosperity, security and intellectual vitality. The author asserts that research universities and industry possess different but complementary strengths and should work in close partnership so that the nation and the world can enjoy the greatest possible benefit. The author concludes with a plea to the members of the Society of Research Administrators to continue to make the public case for a robust and well-supported national research program. The article is based on the author's speech to the Society of Research Administrators on the occasion of his receipt of the 1999 Distinguished Contribution to Research Administration Award, delivered in Denver at the SRA Annual Conference, Oct. 18, 1999. Introduction I sometimes get the feeling that research administration, at least at the level I unaccountably find myself, is nine-tenths smoke and mirrors. Spectacular stuff happens, and even our most beady-eyed critics believe that we research administrators have had something to do with it. This in no way minimizes the great service to America provided by the member institutions and individual members of the Society of Research Administrators (SRA). You are stewards of one of the scarcest resources in education: research dollars (private, state and federal). You find ways to decrease the cost of doing business, stretch the research dollar and encourage the research process, without driving up research administrative overhead. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) has collaborated with universities in the conduct of research and related business affairs for longer that most of you have been alive. We in ONR cherish this relationship, and the success we enjoy is in large part due to people like you. You are active, effective, persistent and even, at times, aggressive spokespeople. You serve as lobbyists, ambassadors, marketers, representatives, emissaries and (too often) lonely advocates for investment in research. I can empathize since I do that too, and it is hard work. It is relentless, and it does not always pay off, but it is critical to your institutions' mission and mine. If you will allow a patriotic moment, you contribute here-as you have for decades-to the economic and security strength of the most prosperous nation on earth. For that too, I salute you. The Ascendance of the American Research University We have reached the end of a decade, a century and a millennium, and a jubilee year is upon us. It is therefore appropriate to reflect on the richness of life and the progress we have made as a people. Indulge me as I list some of the accomplishments of the past few years: * The enemy of our lifetime, the U.S.S.R., is gone, replaced by a more democratic, market-based Russia. * We have, one-by-one, overcome many diseases, thereby increasing ","PeriodicalId":43094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Administration","volume":"1 1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cbo9780511536021.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57058311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}