Objective. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) publications have increased over the past three decades. However, there is no study to address and identify gaps in this area and to plan future research. This study aims to analyze the global scientific production of T1D in terms of overall structure and hotspots. Methodology. The research literature on T1D from 2001 to 2022 was obtained and examined from the Scopus database. We then performed bibliometric analysis and network visualization using MS Excel and VOSviewer software. Results and Discussion. The global T1D research comprised 20473 publications, which witnessed 6.19% and 58.91% annual average and 10-year cumulative growth during 2001-2022. These together received 596950 citations, with an average Citation Per Paper (CPP) of 29.16. Of the total global publications, 6030 (29.45%) received external funding support from international agencies and 19553 citations (with an average CPP of 32.43). The global publications were sourced from more than 150 countries and were published in 2665 journals by 63747 authors from 24899 organizations. There is an uneven distribution of countries, organizations, and authors in T1D research, wherein 88.37%, 45.15%, and 20.66% of the global literature was contributed by the top 12 countries and top 30 organizations and authors each. The most productive countries were the USA and UK, with a global share of 30% and 11.1% respectively. The most impactful countries were Finland and the UK regarding CPP & Relative Citation Index (RCI). The Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, USA, and the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA, were the most productive organizations, with 735 and 679 publications. Jaeb Center for Health Research, USA (77.03 and 2.64) and Harvard Medical School, USA (67.42 and 2.31) were the most impactful organizations regarding CPP & RCI. Pediatric Diabetes (n=1447) and Diabetes Care (n=1191) were the most productive journals, with 1447 and 1191 papers. Diabetes and Diabetes Care registered the highest CPP (81.54 and 73.88 CPP). The most significant and frequently appearing keywords were “diabetes mellitus, type 1”) (92441), “insulin dependent diabetes mellitus” (95750), “metabolism” (24911), “genetics” (11229), “autoantibodies” (8942), “c peptide” (9931) and “pancreas islet beta cell” (7191). Only 5.54% (1134) of the global publications (considered highly-cited papers) received 100 to 4654 citations since their publications and registered a total of 220.28 CPP. Conclusion. This bibliometric study indicated that most of the contributions came from developed countries and only a meager contribution from developing countries, especially South Asia, despite a significant disease burden. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the present status of T1D research. It enables a better understanding of T1D research over the years. It should give the researchers structured information and a comprehensive analysis to help identify gaps in t
{"title":"Global research on type 1 diabetes: A bibliometric study during 2001-2022","authors":"Raju Vaishya, Brij Mohan Gupta, Yogendra Singh, Madhu Bansal, A. Vaish","doi":"10.47909/ijsmc.78","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.78","url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) publications have increased over the past three decades. However, there is no study to address and identify gaps in this area and to plan future research. This study aims to analyze the global scientific production of T1D in terms of overall structure and hotspots.\u0000Methodology. The research literature on T1D from 2001 to 2022 was obtained and examined from the Scopus database. We then performed bibliometric analysis and network visualization using MS Excel and VOSviewer software.\u0000Results and Discussion. The global T1D research comprised 20473 publications, which witnessed 6.19% and 58.91% annual average and 10-year cumulative growth during 2001-2022. These together received 596950 citations, with an average Citation Per Paper (CPP) of 29.16. Of the total global publications, 6030 (29.45%) received external funding support from international agencies and 19553 citations (with an average CPP of 32.43). The global publications were sourced from more than 150 countries and were published in 2665 journals by 63747 authors from 24899 organizations. There is an uneven distribution of countries, organizations, and authors in T1D research, wherein 88.37%, 45.15%, and 20.66% of the global literature was contributed by the top 12 countries and top 30 organizations and authors each. The most productive countries were the USA and UK, with a global share of 30% and 11.1% respectively. The most impactful countries were Finland and the UK regarding CPP & Relative Citation Index (RCI). The Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, USA, and the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA, were the most productive organizations, with 735 and 679 publications. Jaeb Center for Health Research, USA (77.03 and 2.64) and Harvard Medical School, USA (67.42 and 2.31) were the most impactful organizations regarding CPP & RCI. Pediatric Diabetes (n=1447) and Diabetes Care (n=1191) were the most productive journals, with 1447 and 1191 papers. Diabetes and Diabetes Care registered the highest CPP (81.54 and 73.88 CPP). The most significant and frequently appearing keywords were “diabetes mellitus, type 1”) (92441), “insulin dependent diabetes mellitus” (95750), “metabolism” (24911), “genetics” (11229), “autoantibodies” (8942), “c peptide” (9931) and “pancreas islet beta cell” (7191). Only 5.54% (1134) of the global publications (considered highly-cited papers) received 100 to 4654 citations since their publications and registered a total of 220.28 CPP. \u0000Conclusion. This bibliometric study indicated that most of the contributions came from developed countries and only a meager contribution from developing countries, especially South Asia, despite a significant disease burden. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the present status of T1D research. It enables a better understanding of T1D research over the years. It should give the researchers structured information and a comprehensive analysis to help identify gaps in t","PeriodicalId":479669,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","volume":" December","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141824094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karla Martell-Alfaro, Wilfredo Torres-Reátegui, Karen Reátegui-Villacorta, E. Barbachan-Ruales, Rosa Cueto Orbe
Objective. A bibliometric review of the scientific production in ecotourism in Latin America was carried out, with a focus on the contribution of Peru. Design/Methodology/Approach. Bibliometric techniques were combined with a content analysis approach to collect and analyze the literature on ecotourism in Latin America. Articles from 1992 to 2024 were collected using the Scopus database, and VOSviewer software was used to perform a bibliometric analysis. Results/Discussion. A total of 414 articles on ecotourism in Latin America were identified, with a diversity of thematic areas, including ecotourism and sustainable development; tourism, diseases, and dissemination; conservation and ecology; protected areas and marketing; and ecology and spatiotemporal analysis. The analysis revealed low collaboration between authors and the need to diversify the topics investigated in Peru. In addition, there has been an increase in the number of publications in recent years, indicating a growing interest in ecotourism research in the region. Conclusions. Scientific production in ecotourism in Latin America shows growth but with low collaboration and a need for diversification. In Peru, opportunities for improvement were identified, such as increasing research and promoting international collaboration to increase its visibility and impact.
{"title":"Latin American research on ecotourism and Peru's contribution: A bibliometric overview","authors":"Karla Martell-Alfaro, Wilfredo Torres-Reátegui, Karen Reátegui-Villacorta, E. Barbachan-Ruales, Rosa Cueto Orbe","doi":"10.47909/ijsmc.114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.114","url":null,"abstract":"Objective. A bibliometric review of the scientific production in ecotourism in Latin America was carried out, with a focus on the contribution of Peru. \u0000Design/Methodology/Approach. Bibliometric techniques were combined with a content analysis approach to collect and analyze the literature on ecotourism in Latin America. Articles from 1992 to 2024 were collected using the Scopus database, and VOSviewer software was used to perform a bibliometric analysis. \u0000Results/Discussion. A total of 414 articles on ecotourism in Latin America were identified, with a diversity of thematic areas, including ecotourism and sustainable development; tourism, diseases, and dissemination; conservation and ecology; protected areas and marketing; and ecology and spatiotemporal analysis. The analysis revealed low collaboration between authors and the need to diversify the topics investigated in Peru. In addition, there has been an increase in the number of publications in recent years, indicating a growing interest in ecotourism research in the region. \u0000Conclusions. Scientific production in ecotourism in Latin America shows growth but with low collaboration and a need for diversification. In Peru, opportunities for improvement were identified, such as increasing research and promoting international collaboration to increase its visibility and impact.","PeriodicalId":479669,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141368204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J.M. Sanchez Soto, Henri Emmanuel López Gómez, Uldarico Inocencio Aguado Riveros, Manuel Silva Infantes
Introducción: La comunicación científica es vital durante cualquier contingencia, especialmente cuando existe alta incertidumbre. Para investigadores e instituciones, no contar con acceso a información veraz y equilibrada, impacta en su capacidad para enfrentar una crisis, como la pandemia del Covid-19. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de la pandemia de Covid-19 en el desarrollo de la comunicación científica. Desarrollo: Se evaluaron los aspectos que afectaron la comunicación científica durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Esto incluye la velocidad de difusión de información, la colaboración, la comunicación clara y accesible, el uso de plataformas digitales, la desinformación y el cambio de prioridades. Conclusión: En conjunto, estos aspectos han transformado la manera en que se comunica la ciencia durante la pandemia, promoviendo la colaboración global, la transparencia, la accesibilidad y la responsabilidad en la difusión de información científica. Estos cambios tienen el potencial de mejorar la comunicación científica en el futuro y fortalecer la capacidad de la sociedad para enfrentar desafíos de salud pública.
{"title":"Impacto de la pandemia de covid-19 en la comunicación científica","authors":"J.M. Sanchez Soto, Henri Emmanuel López Gómez, Uldarico Inocencio Aguado Riveros, Manuel Silva Infantes","doi":"10.47909/ijsmc.107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.107","url":null,"abstract":"Introducción: La comunicación científica es vital durante cualquier contingencia, especialmente cuando existe alta incertidumbre. Para investigadores e instituciones, no contar con acceso a información veraz y equilibrada, impacta en su capacidad para enfrentar una crisis, como la pandemia del Covid-19. \u0000Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de la pandemia de Covid-19 en el desarrollo de la comunicación científica. \u0000Desarrollo: Se evaluaron los aspectos que afectaron la comunicación científica durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Esto incluye la velocidad de difusión de información, la colaboración, la comunicación clara y accesible, el uso de plataformas digitales, la desinformación y el cambio de prioridades. \u0000Conclusión: En conjunto, estos aspectos han transformado la manera en que se comunica la ciencia durante la pandemia, promoviendo la colaboración global, la transparencia, la accesibilidad y la responsabilidad en la difusión de información científica. Estos cambios tienen el potencial de mejorar la comunicación científica en el futuro y fortalecer la capacidad de la sociedad para enfrentar desafíos de salud pública.","PeriodicalId":479669,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","volume":"4 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141375661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Miguel Valles-Coral, Richard Injante, Edwin Hernández-Torres, Lloy Pinedo, Jorge Raul Navarro-Cabrera, Luis Salazar-Ramírez, Ángel Cárdenas-García, Eddy Huancaruna
Objetivo: Este estudio generamos información significativa sobre el desempeño científico de las universidades peruanas mediante la agregación de sus repositorios institucionales, centrándose en el análisis de palabras clave. El objetivo principal fue evaluar y comprender la producción académica y científica de estas instituciones.
Metodología: Para lograr este propósito, se siguió un protocolo que involucró varias etapas: análisis y optimización del modelo de base de datos de DSPACE, recuperación y validación de datos utilizando el Protocolo OAI-PMH, obtención de un índice de recursos disponibles en los repositorios, extracción y procesamiento de metadatos, y la extracción de palabras clave para su inclusión en la base de datos.
Resultados y discusión: Existe una notable diversidad de palabras clave utilizadas, pues 69.1% aparecen solo una vez, también identificamos una brecha en la producción de tesis entre universidades públicas y privadas. Además, se resalta la discrepancia entre los problemas de la sociedad y las áreas de investigación estudiadas en las universidades, enfatizando la importancia de alinear mejor la producción académica con las demandas regionales.
Conclusiones: Es necesario mejorar la gestión de los repositorios institucionales en las universidades peruanas debido a marcada diversidad en el uso de palabras clave, la brecha en la producción de tesis entre universidades públicas y privadas y la desalineación entre las áreas de investigación y las demandas sociales. Esto implica invertir en formación y capacitación de personal para asegurar que los repositorios cumplan su función fundamental de promover la investigación académica, científica y social en beneficio de la sociedad peruana.
{"title":"Agregación de repositorios institucionales para la generación de información del desempeño científico de universidades peruanas","authors":"Miguel Valles-Coral, Richard Injante, Edwin Hernández-Torres, Lloy Pinedo, Jorge Raul Navarro-Cabrera, Luis Salazar-Ramírez, Ángel Cárdenas-García, Eddy Huancaruna","doi":"10.47909/ijsmc.63","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.63","url":null,"abstract":"Objetivo: Este estudio generamos información significativa sobre el desempeño científico de las universidades peruanas mediante la agregación de sus repositorios institucionales, centrándose en el análisis de palabras clave. El objetivo principal fue evaluar y comprender la producción académica y científica de estas instituciones.
 Metodología: Para lograr este propósito, se siguió un protocolo que involucró varias etapas: análisis y optimización del modelo de base de datos de DSPACE, recuperación y validación de datos utilizando el Protocolo OAI-PMH, obtención de un índice de recursos disponibles en los repositorios, extracción y procesamiento de metadatos, y la extracción de palabras clave para su inclusión en la base de datos.
 Resultados y discusión: Existe una notable diversidad de palabras clave utilizadas, pues 69.1% aparecen solo una vez, también identificamos una brecha en la producción de tesis entre universidades públicas y privadas. Además, se resalta la discrepancia entre los problemas de la sociedad y las áreas de investigación estudiadas en las universidades, enfatizando la importancia de alinear mejor la producción académica con las demandas regionales.
 Conclusiones: Es necesario mejorar la gestión de los repositorios institucionales en las universidades peruanas debido a marcada diversidad en el uso de palabras clave, la brecha en la producción de tesis entre universidades públicas y privadas y la desalineación entre las áreas de investigación y las demandas sociales. Esto implica invertir en formación y capacitación de personal para asegurar que los repositorios cumplan su función fundamental de promover la investigación académica, científica y social en beneficio de la sociedad peruana.","PeriodicalId":479669,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135884483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective. Invasive fungal infections, specifically mucormycosis, showed a massive surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing the global medical fraternity to research this highly fatal co-infection. India has contributed significantly to COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) research, but a bibliometric analysis of this research topic is scarce. Using established bibliometric methods, we aimed to provide the yield and impact of CAM research in India. Design/Methodology/Approach. The publication data on CAM was extracted from Scopus. Data was analyzed using quality indices such as citations per paper (CPP), relative citation index (RCI), and total linkage strength (TLS). Results/Discussion. India contributed 640 (61.2%) to 1045 global publications on CAM research involving 548 authors from 247 organizations. Only 62 (9.8%) and 96 (15.0%) publications were funded and collaborative. The CAM research was focused on clinical features (36.5%), complications (21.7%), risk factors (19.2%), epidemiology (12.3%), diagnostics & imaging (6.8%), treatment outcomes (4.5%), prognosis (3.4%) and pathophysiology (3.1%). The average CPP of Indian publications was 7.8 compared to 28.2 CPP in France, 17.8 CPP in the USA, 8.7 CPP in Saudi Arabia, 8.3 CPP in Bangladesh, and 8.1 CPP in Iran. The major collaborations were with the USA, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, the UK, Pakistan, Malaysia, and UAE. The most productive organizations were PGIMER-Chandigarh (n=47), AIIMS-New Delhi (n=44), and AIIIMS-Jodhpur (n=17), whereas the most impactful organizations were SMS Medical College, Jaipur, SGPGIMS, Lucknow and BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad. The most productive authors were A. Chakrabarti, V. Muthu, and R. Agarwal, and the most impactful were I.S. Sehgal, R. Agarwal, and V. Muthu. The most preferred journals were the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, the Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, and BMJ Case Reports. Conclusions. Even though India is the topmost contributor to global CAM research, the quality of its publications is lower than those from France and the USA. The CAM research is largely non-funded. There is a need to improve international collaboration and increase focus on pathophysiology, epidemiology, and pediatric aspects. This may lead to an improved understanding of CAM and increase survival in affected patients.
{"title":"COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: A bibliometric analysis of Indian research based on Scopus","authors":"Devi Dayal, Brij Mohan Gupta, Jivesh Bansal, Yogendra Singh","doi":"10.47909/ijsmc.54","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.54","url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Invasive fungal infections, specifically mucormycosis, showed a massive surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing the global medical fraternity to research this highly fatal co-infection. India has contributed significantly to COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) research, but a bibliometric analysis of this research topic is scarce. Using established bibliometric methods, we aimed to provide the yield and impact of CAM research in India. Design/Methodology/Approach. The publication data on CAM was extracted from Scopus. Data was analyzed using quality indices such as citations per paper (CPP), relative citation index (RCI), and total linkage strength (TLS). Results/Discussion. India contributed 640 (61.2%) to 1045 global publications on CAM research involving 548 authors from 247 organizations. Only 62 (9.8%) and 96 (15.0%) publications were funded and collaborative. The CAM research was focused on clinical features (36.5%), complications (21.7%), risk factors (19.2%), epidemiology (12.3%), diagnostics & imaging (6.8%), treatment outcomes (4.5%), prognosis (3.4%) and pathophysiology (3.1%). The average CPP of Indian publications was 7.8 compared to 28.2 CPP in France, 17.8 CPP in the USA, 8.7 CPP in Saudi Arabia, 8.3 CPP in Bangladesh, and 8.1 CPP in Iran. The major collaborations were with the USA, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, the UK, Pakistan, Malaysia, and UAE. The most productive organizations were PGIMER-Chandigarh (n=47), AIIMS-New Delhi (n=44), and AIIIMS-Jodhpur (n=17), whereas the most impactful organizations were SMS Medical College, Jaipur, SGPGIMS, Lucknow and BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad. The most productive authors were A. Chakrabarti, V. Muthu, and R. Agarwal, and the most impactful were I.S. Sehgal, R. Agarwal, and V. Muthu. The most preferred journals were the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, the Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, and BMJ Case Reports. Conclusions. Even though India is the topmost contributor to global CAM research, the quality of its publications is lower than those from France and the USA. The CAM research is largely non-funded. There is a need to improve international collaboration and increase focus on pathophysiology, epidemiology, and pediatric aspects. This may lead to an improved understanding of CAM and increase survival in affected patients.","PeriodicalId":479669,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136239607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：