Pub Date : 2024-03-21DOI: 10.4467/15053520pnd.23.016.19423
D. Iwanowicz
Interpretative dilemmas of the use of road signals with particular emphasis on the S-2 signal in “safe” traffic management. Part II/III In this part of the article, the authors focus their attention on the formal and legal issues related to the design of traffic signals on roads and intersections in Poland. A synthesis of the characteristics of the necessary content of the design of traffic organization with traffic lights, approved by the competent authority managing traffic on the road is given. A historical outline of the guidelines for the implementation of the signal allowing turning in the direction indicated by the green arrow is provided. The most important aspect of this part of the article is a commentary on the current legal provisions regarding the permissibility and inadmissibility of allowing simultaneous movement of individual collision streams – with particular emphasis on vehicle streams controlled by the S-2 traffic signal. The commentary includes separate references to the legal status from the original version of the requirements made in 2004 and from the 2008 and 2015 amendments to the regulations. In the authors’ opinion, these descriptions provide key points explaining the complexity of the problem for designers, reviewers, and approvers of signals controlled traffic organization. An effort has been made to explain comprehensively all possible situations since there is currently a non-uniform application of signal phases at intersections and different opinions on the questions of interpreting the correct application of the "green arrow" signal. The results of the study in this regard are included in part III of the article.
{"title":"Dylematy interpretacyjne stosowania sygnałów drogowych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem sygnalizatora S-2 w „bezpiecznym” zarządzaniu ruchem drogowym. Część II/III","authors":"D. Iwanowicz","doi":"10.4467/15053520pnd.23.016.19423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/15053520pnd.23.016.19423","url":null,"abstract":"Interpretative dilemmas of the use of road signals with particular emphasis on the S-2 signal in “safe” traffic management. Part II/III\u0000\u0000In this part of the article, the authors focus their attention on the formal and legal issues related to the design of traffic signals on roads and intersections in Poland. A synthesis of the characteristics of the necessary content of the design of traffic organization with traffic lights, approved by the competent authority managing traffic on the road is given. A historical outline of the guidelines for the implementation of the signal allowing turning in the direction indicated by the green arrow is provided. The most important aspect of this part of the article is a commentary on the current legal provisions regarding the permissibility and inadmissibility of allowing simultaneous movement of individual collision streams – with particular emphasis on vehicle streams controlled by the S-2 traffic signal. The commentary includes separate references to the legal status from the original version of the requirements made in 2004 and from the 2008 and 2015 amendments to the regulations. In the authors’ opinion, these descriptions provide key points explaining the complexity of the problem for designers, reviewers, and approvers of signals controlled traffic organization. An effort has been made to explain comprehensively all possible situations since there is currently a non-uniform application of signal phases at intersections and different opinions on the questions of interpreting the correct application of the \"green arrow\" signal. The results of the study in this regard are included in part III of the article.","PeriodicalId":500733,"journal":{"name":"Paragraf na Drodze","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140387754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-21DOI: 10.4467/15053520pnd.23.015.19422
Witold Matejko
The ban on using a phone while driving. Analysis of Art. 45 para. 2 section 1 of the Act on Road Traffic The subject of the article is the ban on using a phone while driving, established by Art. 45 para. 2 section 1 of the Act on Road Traffic. The author expresses interpretative doubts concerning the text of the regulation including the meaning of the terms “using a phone”, the modal circumstance of “while driving”, as well as the term “requiring holding the earphone or microphone in the hand”. In the author’s opinion, the provision in question in its current wording, dating from 2002, is largely outdated and not adapter to modern reality. Moreover, it is worded incorrectly, to the extent that its literal interpretation deprives it of any normative significance.
{"title":"Zakaz korzystania z telefonu podczas jazdy. Analiza art. 45 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy Prawo o ruchu drogowym","authors":"Witold Matejko","doi":"10.4467/15053520pnd.23.015.19422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4467/15053520pnd.23.015.19422","url":null,"abstract":"The ban on using a phone while driving. Analysis of Art. 45 para. 2 section 1 of the Act on Road Traffic\u0000\u0000The subject of the article is the ban on using a phone while driving, established by Art. 45 para. 2 section 1 of the Act on Road Traffic. The author expresses interpretative doubts concerning the text of the regulation including the meaning of the terms “using a phone”, the modal circumstance of “while driving”, as well as the term “requiring holding the earphone or microphone in the hand”. In the author’s opinion, the provision in question in its current wording, dating from 2002, is largely outdated and not adapter to modern reality. Moreover, it is worded incorrectly, to the extent that its literal interpretation deprives it of any normative significance.","PeriodicalId":500733,"journal":{"name":"Paragraf na Drodze","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140388197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：