Pub Date : 2023-12-31DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.422
Reiner Georg Ziefle
Special relativity (SR) needs different speeds of light in the horizontal arm of the Michelson‐Morley interferometer to “explain” a constant speed of light in all inertial frames. To obtain equal speeds from the two different speeds of light (c−v) = [(1 ‐ v/c) × c] and (c + v) = [(1 + v/c) × c], Einstein mathematically accelerates the speed of the photons in the direction of Earth’s motion around the Sun from [(1 ‐ v/c) × c] to [(1 − v2/c2) × c], and in the opposite direction, Einstein decelerates the speed of the photons from [(1 + v/c) × c] to [(1 − v2/c2) × c]. Besides the fact that light cannot be accelerated or decelerated, a change of the speed of the photons in the inertial frame of the Sun would also change the speed c of photons on Earth, because in both inertial frames, the photons always move in horizontal light path of the Michelson‐Morley interferometer in the same direction. SR contradicts its own postulates: 1. SR contradicts the constant speed c of light on Earth; 2. SR contradicts the constant speed c of light in all inertial frames, respectively, in all frames of reference; 3. SR contradicts the principle of relativity. Einstein transformed photons into particles that are allowed to violate logical and physical laws but are not allowed to interact with gravity, so that they have to follow curved world lines. However, giving up logical and physical laws because of precise predictions of a physical theory means arguing pseudo-scientifically. Instead, a simple quantum physical explanation of gravity is presented.
狭义相对论（SR）需要在迈克尔逊-莫雷干涉仪的水平臂上用不同的光速来 "解释 "所有惯性框架中的恒定光速。为了从两种不同的光速（c-v）=[（1-v/c）×c]和（c+v）=[（1+v/c）×c]中获得等速、在数学上，爱因斯坦将光子在地球绕太阳运动方向上的速度从[(1-v/c) × c]加速到[(1-v2/c2) × c]，而在相反方向上，爱因斯坦则将光子的速度从[(1+v/c) × c]减速到[(1-v2/c2) × c]。 除了光不能加速或减速这一事实之外，光子在太阳惯性框架中速度的改变也会改变光子在地球上的速度 c，因为在两个惯性框架中，光子总是在迈克尔逊-莫雷干涉仪的水平光路中以相同的方向运动。SR自相矛盾：1.SR 与地球上的光速 c 恒定相矛盾；2. SR 与所有惯性框架中的光速 c 恒定相矛盾；3. SR 与相对论原理相矛盾。 爱因斯坦将光子转化为粒子，允许它们违反逻辑和物理定律，但不允许它们与引力相互作用，因此它们必须遵循弯曲的世界线。然而，因为物理理论的精确预言而放弃逻辑和物理定律，意味着伪科学的论证。相反，我们提出了引力的简单量子物理解释。
{"title":"Einstein’s special relativity applies a not recognized physical mistake leading to an absurd interpretation of the Michelson‐Morley experiment and absurd physics","authors":"Reiner Georg Ziefle","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.422","url":null,"abstract":"Special relativity (SR) needs different speeds of light in the horizontal arm of the Michelson‐Morley interferometer to “explain” a constant speed of light in all inertial frames. To obtain equal speeds from the two different speeds of light (c−v) = [(1 ‐ v/c) × c] and (c + v) = [(1 + v/c) × c], Einstein mathematically accelerates the speed of the photons in the direction of Earth’s motion around the Sun from [(1 ‐ v/c) × c] to [(1 − v2/c2) × c], and in the opposite direction, Einstein decelerates the speed of the photons from [(1 + v/c) × c] to [(1 − v2/c2) × c]. Besides the fact that light cannot be accelerated or decelerated, a change of the speed of the photons in the inertial frame of the Sun would also change the speed c of photons on Earth, because in both inertial frames, the photons always move in horizontal light path of the Michelson‐Morley interferometer in the same direction. SR contradicts its own postulates: 1. SR contradicts the constant speed c of light on Earth; 2. SR contradicts the constant speed c of light in all inertial frames, respectively, in all frames of reference; 3. SR contradicts the principle of relativity. Einstein transformed photons into particles that are allowed to violate logical and physical laws but are not allowed to interact with gravity, so that they have to follow curved world lines. However, giving up logical and physical laws because of precise predictions of a physical theory means arguing pseudo-scientifically. Instead, a simple quantum physical explanation of gravity is presented.","PeriodicalId":507534,"journal":{"name":"Physics Essays","volume":"116 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139134182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-30DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.464
Berat Tuğrul Uğurlu
We will show that the prepositions: Propagation of light and existence of physical distances, together form a circular reasoning fallacy. Thereby, we will claim that we do not have an implicit proof for the propagation of light and the existence of physical distances.
{"title":"On the propagation of light and the existence of physical distances","authors":"Berat Tuğrul Uğurlu","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.464","url":null,"abstract":"We will show that the prepositions: Propagation of light and existence of physical distances, together form a circular reasoning fallacy. Thereby, we will claim that we do not have an implicit proof for the propagation of light and the existence of physical distances.","PeriodicalId":507534,"journal":{"name":"Physics Essays","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139141513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-29DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.459
Teodor Ognean
This article presents an original idea on the “generation of mass” resulting from the light. In principle, it is considered that, in the Universe, the mass is the result of a “condensation” process of light. The condensation of light is in a direct relationship with a rotational movement that appears in a linear motion. As an effect of the rotary motion, certain elementary mass entities are “generated” from light. In this process, gravity plays a key role. The number of mass entities generated from light is in a direct relationship with Avogadro number. On the base of the relationships established in the article is shown how the mass can be generated into an atom starting from light.
{"title":"An original idea on the “generation of mass” from light","authors":"Teodor Ognean","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.459","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an original idea on the “generation of mass” resulting from the light. In principle, it is considered that, in the Universe, the mass is the result of a “condensation” process of light. The condensation of light is in a direct relationship with a rotational movement that appears in a linear motion. As an effect of the rotary motion, certain elementary mass entities are “generated” from light. In this process, gravity plays a key role. The number of mass entities generated from light is in a direct relationship with Avogadro number. On the base of the relationships established in the article is shown how the mass can be generated into an atom starting from light.","PeriodicalId":507534,"journal":{"name":"Physics Essays","volume":"197 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139145813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-28DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.372
Jingshown Wu, H. Tsao, Yen-Ru Huang
The Lorentz transformations transform the coordinates in a frame at rest and those in a frame moving with a constant velocity with respect to the rest frame. We analyze the Lorentz transformations using a world line diagram and simple algebra, obtaining some astonishing results. We use two examples to demonstrate that the Lorentz transformations contradict reality and are invalid. Employing the proper definition of simultaneity, we formulate the coordinate transformations between the two frames and obtain the Galileo transformations. Additionally, we suppose A, M, and B are points on the x-axis moving in the x direction and the distances AM = MB. Source S rests on the x-axis and emits signals when S and M coincide. The emitted signal reaches A earlier than it reaches B. In other words, A, which is approaching the signal source, receives the signal earlier than B, which is moving away from the signal source.
洛伦兹变换可以变换静止帧和相对于静止帧匀速运动帧的坐标。我们用世界线图和简单的代数来分析洛伦兹变换，得到了一些惊人的结果。我们用两个例子来证明洛伦兹变换与现实相矛盾，是无效的。利用同时性的正确定义，我们提出了两个框架之间的坐标变换，并得到了伽利略变换。此外，我们假设 A、M 和 B 是 x 轴上沿 x 方向运动的点，距离 AM = MB。信号源 S 位于 x 轴上，当 S 和 M 重合时发射信号。换句话说，正在接近信号源的 A 比远离信号源的 B 更早收到信号。
{"title":"Criticism of the Lorentz transformations","authors":"Jingshown Wu, H. Tsao, Yen-Ru Huang","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.372","url":null,"abstract":"The Lorentz transformations transform the coordinates in a frame at rest and those in a frame moving with a constant velocity with respect to the rest frame. We analyze the Lorentz transformations using a world line diagram and simple algebra, obtaining some astonishing results. We use two examples to demonstrate that the Lorentz transformations contradict reality and are invalid. Employing the proper definition of simultaneity, we formulate the coordinate transformations between the two frames and obtain the Galileo transformations. Additionally, we suppose A, M, and B are points on the x-axis moving in the x direction and the distances AM = MB. Source S rests on the x-axis and emits signals when S and M coincide. The emitted signal reaches A earlier than it reaches B. In other words, A, which is approaching the signal source, receives the signal earlier than B, which is moving away from the signal source.","PeriodicalId":507534,"journal":{"name":"Physics Essays","volume":"20 11‐12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139150195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-18DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.405
Radzhabov Toir Makhsudovich
This article is devoted to the criticism of the wave-particle dualism and the provisions of the special theory of relativity (SRT). The fallacy of accepting the extended principle of relativity and identifying particles and waves is shown. The substantiation is given that the own fields of physical objects, which are material substances and spatially connect physical objects with each other, are the medium of propagation of light waves. The causal and visual picture of the propagation of light waves is considered, and the features of the mechanism of their propagation in comparison with other types of waves are described. On the basis of an alternative method for obtaining the relativistic law of velocities addition, the inconsistency of the principle of invariance of the interval adopted in the framework of SRT is shown. The inconsistency of the SRT positions and conclusions regarding the so-called relativistic effects—time dilation, mass increase, length decrease, as well as the energy of relativistic particles is shown. The presence of the clock paradox is shown by a simple example. The conclusion is made about the incorrectness of using mathematical transformations of Lorentz and the four-dimensional continuum in the physical representation.
{"title":"On the distinction between corpuscular and wave processes and the arbitrariness in the basis of special relativity theory","authors":"Radzhabov Toir Makhsudovich","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.4.405","url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the criticism of the wave-particle dualism and the provisions of the special theory of relativity (SRT). The fallacy of accepting the extended principle of relativity and identifying particles and waves is shown. The substantiation is given that the own fields of physical objects, which are material substances and spatially connect physical objects with each other, are the medium of propagation of light waves. The causal and visual picture of the propagation of light waves is considered, and the features of the mechanism of their propagation in comparison with other types of waves are described. On the basis of an alternative method for obtaining the relativistic law of velocities addition, the inconsistency of the principle of invariance of the interval adopted in the framework of SRT is shown. The inconsistency of the SRT positions and conclusions regarding the so-called relativistic effects—time dilation, mass increase, length decrease, as well as the energy of relativistic particles is shown. The presence of the clock paradox is shown by a simple example. The conclusion is made about the incorrectness of using mathematical transformations of Lorentz and the four-dimensional continuum in the physical representation.","PeriodicalId":507534,"journal":{"name":"Physics Essays","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139175303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：