首页 > 最新文献

Cancer survivorship research & care最新文献

英文 中文
Health behaviors, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk, among US cancer survivors: a HINTS-SEER study. 美国癌症幸存者的健康行为,以及对健康行为和癌症风险的信念:一项HINTS-SEER研究。
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1080/28352610.2025.2531876
Erin L Van Blarigan, Stephen Li, Robin C Vanderpool, Salma Shariff-Marco, Sarah H Nash, Meg McKinley, Nicole Senft Everson, Angela L W Meisner, Jess Gorzelitz, Scarlett L Gomez, Mindy C DeRouen

Background: It is important to understand how health behaviors, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk, vary by sociodemographic factors.

Methods: The Health Information National Trends Survey - Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study sampled US cancer survivors in 2021. We used weighted logistic regression to examine associations between sociodemographic factors, health behavior guideline adherence, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk.

Results: Among 1134 cancer survivors, only 4% were current smokers, but 48% consumed alcohol and only 43% met aerobic exercise guidelines and 31% met strength training guidelines. Alcohol use was more common among males [vs. females, odds ratio (OR): 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12, 2.14], employed cancer survivors (vs. retired OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.84), and those with higher incomes (<$50,000 vs. $100,000+ (ref.) OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.94). Cancer survivors less likely to meet aerobic exercise guidelines included those who were not retired or employed (e.g. disabled; vs. retired OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.86), with incomes <$50,000 (vs. $100,000+ OR: 95% CI: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.78), and residing in non-metropolitan areas (vs. metropolitan with 1 + million residents, OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.81). Females and retired cancer survivors were less likely to meet strength training guidelines (males vs. females (ref.) OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.12; employed vs. retired (ref.) OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.66). Lower education was strongly associated with beliefs that cancer risk is outside individual control (OR's: 1.73-3.85). Beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk were not associated with health behavior guideline adherence.

Conclusions: Smoking was uncommon in this sample of cancer survivors, but many reported alcohol use and did not meet exercise guidelines. Patterns of sociodemographic factors differed by behavior. Alcohol use was more common among males and those with higher incomes. Cancer survivors with lower incomes and residing in non-metropolitan areas had the highest need for physical activity interventions.

背景:重要的是要了解健康行为,以及关于健康行为和癌症风险的信念是如何随社会人口因素而变化的。方法:健康信息国家趋势调查-监测,流行病学和最终结果研究于2021年对美国癌症幸存者进行抽样。我们使用加权逻辑回归来检验社会人口学因素、健康行为指南依从性以及关于健康行为和癌症风险的信念之间的关联。结果:在1134名癌症幸存者中,目前只有4%的人吸烟,但48%的人饮酒,只有43%的人符合有氧运动指南,31%的人符合力量训练指南。饮酒在男性中更为常见[与女性相比,优势比(OR): 1.55;95%可信区间(CI): 1.12, 2.14],在职癌症幸存者(相对于退休OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.84),以及收入较高的癌症幸存者(结论:吸烟在癌症幸存者样本中不常见,但许多报告饮酒,不符合运动指南。社会人口因素的模式因行为而异。饮酒在男性和高收入人群中更为普遍。收入较低且居住在非大都市地区的癌症幸存者对身体活动干预的需求最高。
{"title":"Health behaviors, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk, among US cancer survivors: a HINTS-SEER study.","authors":"Erin L Van Blarigan, Stephen Li, Robin C Vanderpool, Salma Shariff-Marco, Sarah H Nash, Meg McKinley, Nicole Senft Everson, Angela L W Meisner, Jess Gorzelitz, Scarlett L Gomez, Mindy C DeRouen","doi":"10.1080/28352610.2025.2531876","DOIUrl":"10.1080/28352610.2025.2531876","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to understand how health behaviors, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk, vary by sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Health Information National Trends Survey - Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study sampled US cancer survivors in 2021. We used weighted logistic regression to examine associations between sociodemographic factors, health behavior guideline adherence, and beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1134 cancer survivors, only 4% were current smokers, but 48% consumed alcohol and only 43% met aerobic exercise guidelines and 31% met strength training guidelines. Alcohol use was more common among males [vs. females, odds ratio (OR): 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12, 2.14], employed cancer survivors (vs. retired OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.84), and those with higher incomes (<$50,000 vs. $100,000+ (ref.) OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.94). Cancer survivors less likely to meet aerobic exercise guidelines included those who were not retired or employed (e.g. disabled; vs. retired OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.86), with incomes <$50,000 (vs. $100,000+ OR: 95% CI: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.78), and residing in non-metropolitan areas (vs. metropolitan with 1 + million residents, OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.81). Females and retired cancer survivors were less likely to meet strength training guidelines (males vs. females (ref.) OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.12; employed vs. retired (ref.) OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.66). Lower education was strongly associated with beliefs that cancer risk is outside individual control (OR's: 1.73-3.85). Beliefs about health behaviors and cancer risk were not associated with health behavior guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking was uncommon in this sample of cancer survivors, but many reported alcohol use and did not meet exercise guidelines. Patterns of sociodemographic factors differed by behavior. Alcohol use was more common among males and those with higher incomes. Cancer survivors with lower incomes and residing in non-metropolitan areas had the highest need for physical activity interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":510903,"journal":{"name":"Cancer survivorship research & care","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680075/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145703661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Urban greenspace and cardiovascular disease comorbidity at breast cancer diagnosis in the US: Regional, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic variations among older women. 美国城市绿地和心血管疾病在乳腺癌诊断中的合并症:老年妇女的地区、种族/民族和社会经济差异
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI: 10.1080/28352610.2025.2494564
Jean C Bikomeye, Emily L McGinley, Yuhong Zhou, Sergey Tarima, Jamila L Kwarteng, Andreas M Beyer, Tina W F Yen, Aaron N Winn, Kirsten M M Beyer

Objective: To investigate the association between urban residential greenspace and cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidity at breast cancer (BC) diagnosis among older women, and explore regional, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic differences.

Study design: This is a cross-sectional analysis of a population-based registry data.

Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, data on women aged 66-90 diagnosed with BC (2010-2017) were analyzed. A tract-level measure of tree canopy cover was derived from the National Landcover Database (2011) and linked to SEER-Medicare records. Logistic regression models assessed the probability of CVD comorbidity based on state-specific percent tree canopy quartiles, adjusting for census tract clustering and covariates.

Results: Out of 116,660 women, 74.7% (n=87,152) had CVD comorbidity at BC diagnosis. Overall, women residing in areas with higher percent tree canopy cover had a lower likelihood of CVD comorbidity compared to those in the lowest canopy areas, with an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.78 (0.71-0.85). Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic status (SES), and regional variations were noted. Adjusted effects of greenspace were significant only for NHW women; AOR (95%CI) = 0.78 (0.71-0.86). Women in the highest tree canopy quartile in California, New Jersey, and New Mexico had lower odds of comorbid CVD, with AORs (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.72-0.88), 0.77 (0.71-0.84), and 0.46 (0.34-0.63) respectively. Adjusted results for New York, Massachusetts, and Kentucky showed adverse harmful effects, while adjusted results for all other SEER states were not statistically significant. Both dual enrollment eligible and non-eligible women had benefits from greenspace, but greater benefits were observed in dual enrollment eligible women; AOR (95% CI)= 0.64 (0.48-0.86) versus 0.76 (0.69-0.84) for non-eligible women.

Conclusions: Overall, urban greenspace is associated with a lower risk of CVD comorbidity among older women with BC, and variations exist by region, race/ethnicity, and SES. Our findings underscore the role of greenspace in mitigating Cardio-Oncology disparities. Further research is needed to better understand factors contributing to observed differences across SEER regions and racial/ethnic subgroups. A better understanding of interactions among greenspace, other environmental factors, and individual lifestyle factors will help improve CVD outcomes among women with BC.

目的:探讨城市居住绿地与老年女性乳腺癌(BC)诊断时心血管疾病(CVD)合并症的关系,并探讨地区、种族/民族和社会经济差异。研究设计:这是一项基于人群的登记数据的横断面分析。方法:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-Medicare关联数据库,分析2010-2017年诊断为BC的66-90岁女性的数据。从国家土地覆盖数据库(2011年)导出了林带水平的树冠覆盖测量,并与SEER-Medicare记录相关联。Logistic回归模型基于各州特定的树冠四分位数百分比评估心血管疾病合并症的概率,调整人口普查区聚类和协变量。结果:在116,660名女性中,74.7% (n=87,152)在BC诊断时患有CVD合并症。总体而言,与树冠覆盖率最低的女性相比,居住在树冠覆盖率较高地区的女性患心血管疾病的可能性更低,调整优势比(AOR)和95%置信区间(CI)为0.78(0.71-0.85)。注意到种族/民族、社会经济地位(SES)和地区差异。调整后的绿地效应仅对NHW女性显著;Aor (95%ci) = 0.78(0.71 ~ 0.86)。加利福尼亚州、新泽西州和新墨西哥州最高的树冠四分位数的女性患共病心血管疾病的几率较低,AORs (95% CI)分别为0.80(0.72-0.88)、0.77(0.71-0.84)和0.46(0.34-0.63)。纽约州、马萨诸塞州和肯塔基州的调整结果显示出不利的有害影响,而所有其他SEER州的调整结果没有统计学意义。符合双入组条件和不符合双入组条件的妇女都从绿地中获益,但符合双入组条件的妇女获益更大;非合格妇女的AOR (95% CI)= 0.64(0.48-0.86),而非0.76(0.69-0.84)。结论:总体而言,城市绿地与老年BC女性CVD合并症风险较低相关,且因地区、种族/民族和社会经济地位而存在差异。我们的研究结果强调了绿色空间在减轻心脏肿瘤学差异中的作用。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解导致SEER区域和种族/民族亚群之间观察到的差异的因素。更好地了解绿地、其他环境因素和个人生活方式因素之间的相互作用将有助于改善BC女性的心血管疾病结局。
{"title":"Urban greenspace and cardiovascular disease comorbidity at breast cancer diagnosis in the US: Regional, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic variations among older women.","authors":"Jean C Bikomeye, Emily L McGinley, Yuhong Zhou, Sergey Tarima, Jamila L Kwarteng, Andreas M Beyer, Tina W F Yen, Aaron N Winn, Kirsten M M Beyer","doi":"10.1080/28352610.2025.2494564","DOIUrl":"10.1080/28352610.2025.2494564","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between urban residential greenspace and cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidity at breast cancer (BC) diagnosis among older women, and explore regional, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic differences.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a cross-sectional analysis of a population-based registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, data on women aged 66-90 diagnosed with BC (2010-2017) were analyzed. A tract-level measure of tree canopy cover was derived from the National Landcover Database (2011) and linked to SEER-Medicare records. Logistic regression models assessed the probability of CVD comorbidity based on state-specific percent tree canopy quartiles, adjusting for census tract clustering and covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 116,660 women, 74.7% (n=87,152) had CVD comorbidity at BC diagnosis. Overall, women residing in areas with higher percent tree canopy cover had a lower likelihood of CVD comorbidity compared to those in the lowest canopy areas, with an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.78 (0.71-0.85). Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic status (SES), and regional variations were noted. Adjusted effects of greenspace were significant only for NHW women; AOR (95%CI) = 0.78 (0.71-0.86). Women in the highest tree canopy quartile in California, New Jersey, and New Mexico had lower odds of comorbid CVD, with AORs (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.72-0.88), 0.77 (0.71-0.84), and 0.46 (0.34-0.63) respectively. Adjusted results for New York, Massachusetts, and Kentucky showed adverse harmful effects, while adjusted results for all other SEER states were not statistically significant. Both dual enrollment eligible and non-eligible women had benefits from greenspace, but greater benefits were observed in dual enrollment eligible women; AOR (95% CI)= 0.64 (0.48-0.86) versus 0.76 (0.69-0.84) for non-eligible women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, urban greenspace is associated with a lower risk of CVD comorbidity among older women with BC, and variations exist by region, race/ethnicity, and SES. Our findings underscore the role of greenspace in mitigating Cardio-Oncology disparities. Further research is needed to better understand factors contributing to observed differences across SEER regions and racial/ethnic subgroups. A better understanding of interactions among greenspace, other environmental factors, and individual lifestyle factors will help improve CVD outcomes among women with BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":510903,"journal":{"name":"Cancer survivorship research & care","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382361/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144985217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated with Delaying and Forgoing Care Due to Cost among Long-term, Appalachian Cancer Survivors in Rural North Carolina. 北卡罗来纳州农村地区阿巴拉契亚癌症长期存活者因费用问题推迟和放弃治疗的相关因素。
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-18 DOI: 10.1080/28352610.2023.2270401
Derek S Falk, Janet A Tooze, Karen M Winkfield, Ronny A Bell, Sarah A Birken, Bonny B Morris, Carla Strom, Emily Copus, Kelsey Shore, Kathryn E Weaver

Background: Little research exists on delayed and forgone health and mental health care due to cost among rural cancer survivors.

Methods: We surveyed survivors in 7 primarily rural, Appalachian counties February to May 2020. Univariable analyses examined the distribution and prevalence of delayed/forgone care due to cost in the past year by independent variables. Chi-square or Fisher's tests examined bivariable differences. Logistic regressions assessed the odds of delayed/forgone care due to cost.

Results: Respondents (n=428), aged 68.6 years on average (SD: 12.0), were 96.3% non-Hispanic white and 49.8% female; 25.0% reported delayed/forgone care due to cost. The response rate was 18.5%. The proportion of delayed/forgone care for those aged 18-64 years was 46.7% and 15.0% for those aged 65+ years (P<0.0001). Females aged 65+ years (OR: 2.00; CI: 1.02-3.93) had double the odds of delayed/forgone care due to cost compared to males aged 65+ years.

Conclusion: About one in four rural cancer survivors reported delayed/forgone care due to cost, with rates approaching 50% in survivors aged <65 years.

Impact: Clinical implications indicate the need to: 1) ask about the impact of care costs, and 2) provide supportive services to mitigate effects of treatment costs, particularly for younger and female survivors.

背景:有关农村癌症幸存者因费用问题而延误和放弃医疗及心理健康护理的研究很少:我们于 2020 年 2 月至 5 月对阿巴拉契亚地区 7 个以农村为主的县的幸存者进行了调查。单变量分析根据自变量检验了过去一年中因费用而延迟/放弃治疗的分布和发生率。卡方检验或费雪检验检验了二变量差异。逻辑回归评估了因费用而延误/放弃护理的几率:受访者(n=428)的平均年龄为 68.6 岁(SD:12.0),96.3% 为非西班牙裔白人,49.8% 为女性;25.0% 的受访者表示因费用问题而延误/放弃治疗。回复率为 18.5%。年龄在 18-64 岁之间的患者中,因费用问题而延误/放弃治疗的比例为 46.7%,而年龄在 65 岁以上的患者中,因费用问题而延误/放弃治疗的比例为 15.0%:每四名农村癌症幸存者中就有一人因费用问题而延迟/放弃治疗,其中年龄在 18-64 岁的幸存者中这一比例接近 50%:临床影响表明需要1)询问治疗费用的影响,2)提供支持性服务以减轻治疗费用的影响,尤其是对年轻的女性幸存者而言。
{"title":"Factors Associated with Delaying and Forgoing Care Due to Cost among Long-term, Appalachian Cancer Survivors in Rural North Carolina.","authors":"Derek S Falk, Janet A Tooze, Karen M Winkfield, Ronny A Bell, Sarah A Birken, Bonny B Morris, Carla Strom, Emily Copus, Kelsey Shore, Kathryn E Weaver","doi":"10.1080/28352610.2023.2270401","DOIUrl":"10.1080/28352610.2023.2270401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little research exists on delayed and forgone health and mental health care due to cost among rural cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed survivors in 7 primarily rural, Appalachian counties February to May 2020. Univariable analyses examined the distribution and prevalence of delayed/forgone care due to cost in the past year by independent variables. Chi-square or Fisher's tests examined bivariable differences. Logistic regressions assessed the odds of delayed/forgone care due to cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (n=428), aged 68.6 years on average (SD: 12.0), were 96.3% non-Hispanic white and 49.8% female; 25.0% reported delayed/forgone care due to cost. The response rate was 18.5%. The proportion of delayed/forgone care for those aged 18-64 years was 46.7% and 15.0% for those aged 65+ years (P<0.0001). Females aged 65+ years (OR: 2.00; CI: 1.02-3.93) had double the odds of delayed/forgone care due to cost compared to males aged 65+ years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About one in four rural cancer survivors reported delayed/forgone care due to cost, with rates approaching 50% in survivors aged <65 years.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Clinical implications indicate the need to: 1) ask about the impact of care costs, and 2) provide supportive services to mitigate effects of treatment costs, particularly for younger and female survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":510903,"journal":{"name":"Cancer survivorship research & care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766413/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139099473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer survivorship research & care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1