The modern idea of Risk-Informed Decision-Making (RIDM) is here critically examined for all existing, advanced and Generation-IV nuclear reactor systems. Motivated by the predictive difficulties of Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) in regard to occurred accidents, it is evident that the real (not hypothetical) consequences of nuclear core damage accidents that must be considered and quantified are the financial losses, infrastructure damages, societal disruptions and adverse political policies, and not solely the traditional exceedance of regulated radiation release or public exposure limits. With this perspective, a new dynamic analysis is presented for estimating the probability of core damage due to extended loss of power and cooling in a modern nuclear reactor, giving results different from current standardized PRA/PSA analyses. Using existing data, we approach the multitude of different events in a new way: whatever the initial event in the finite event set{external flood, fire, hurricane, ice storm, typhoon, earthquake, cyber attack…}, the fundamental concerns are the consequent loss and non-restoration of power, and the inadequate cooling of the core. The present proposed quantitative evaluation uses applicable and fully "exchangeable" severe event data for nuclear and non-nuclear systems, including 'active' and 'passive' emergency back-up systems for a wide range of power losses that lead to widespread damage and societal disruption. While not design-specific, this new independent "order-of-magnitude" estimate for the probability of core damage is some two to two hundred times larger than that shown or reported in recent modern and formal PSA/PRA for licensing submission using generic failure rate data rather than actual severe event data. This new finding suggests greater uncertainties exist than presently assumed for Risk-Informed Decision-Making (RIDM), and points to the need for a major reconsideration and updating of risk assessment and regulatory risk-informed approaches for nuclear plant safety evaluation.
{"title":"Risk-informing Nuclear Reactor Safety: the Prediction of the Probability of Core Damage Due to Loss of Power and Cooling","authors":"Romney Duffey, E. Zio","doi":"10.1115/1.4064745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064745","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The modern idea of Risk-Informed Decision-Making (RIDM) is here critically examined for all existing, advanced and Generation-IV nuclear reactor systems. Motivated by the predictive difficulties of Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) in regard to occurred accidents, it is evident that the real (not hypothetical) consequences of nuclear core damage accidents that must be considered and quantified are the financial losses, infrastructure damages, societal disruptions and adverse political policies, and not solely the traditional exceedance of regulated radiation release or public exposure limits. With this perspective, a new dynamic analysis is presented for estimating the probability of core damage due to extended loss of power and cooling in a modern nuclear reactor, giving results different from current standardized PRA/PSA analyses. Using existing data, we approach the multitude of different events in a new way: whatever the initial event in the finite event set{external flood, fire, hurricane, ice storm, typhoon, earthquake, cyber attack…}, the fundamental concerns are the consequent loss and non-restoration of power, and the inadequate cooling of the core. The present proposed quantitative evaluation uses applicable and fully \"exchangeable\" severe event data for nuclear and non-nuclear systems, including 'active' and 'passive' emergency back-up systems for a wide range of power losses that lead to widespread damage and societal disruption. While not design-specific, this new independent \"order-of-magnitude\" estimate for the probability of core damage is some two to two hundred times larger than that shown or reported in recent modern and formal PSA/PRA for licensing submission using generic failure rate data rather than actual severe event data. This new finding suggests greater uncertainties exist than presently assumed for Risk-Informed Decision-Making (RIDM), and points to the need for a major reconsideration and updating of risk assessment and regulatory risk-informed approaches for nuclear plant safety evaluation.","PeriodicalId":517284,"journal":{"name":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B: Mechanical Engineering","volume":"36 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139894303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：