Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.5935/1808-5687.20230041
Milton José Cazassa, George M Slavich, Victoria Helena Pesenti E Silva, Lauren Heineck de Souza, Elisa Steinhorst Damasceno, Raissa Telesca Arrial Cordeiro, Margareth Da Silva Oliveira
Introduction: Numerous instruments have been developed around the world to assess stress. This study aimed to identify instruments with validation studies that mapping stress in Brazil.
Method: an integrative review was carried out on databases and the Testing System of the Federal Council of Psychology (SATEPSI) in June 2017 and updated this year. Two independent judges participated in analyzing the results.
Results: Of the 6,377 articles, 47 articles were selected from the Index Psi, SciELO, LILACS and PubMed databases, and 35 instruments made up the sample, two of which were from SATEPSI. Nine of these tools map stress in a more general way, nine are aimed at specific clinical contexts, 12 are aimed at occupational stress, three at the sports context and another two at other contexts.
Discussion: Numerous health problems are associated with early and chronic stressors, however it was identified that most instruments access stress in a more recent period of time (last year, month or week). A more accurate analysis of the relationships between longitudinal stress and health outcomes appears limited in this sense. The Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) appears as an alternative for studying stress throughout life in the Brazilian reality.
{"title":"[Instruments for assessing stress in Brazilians: an integrative review].","authors":"Milton José Cazassa, George M Slavich, Victoria Helena Pesenti E Silva, Lauren Heineck de Souza, Elisa Steinhorst Damasceno, Raissa Telesca Arrial Cordeiro, Margareth Da Silva Oliveira","doi":"10.5935/1808-5687.20230041","DOIUrl":"10.5935/1808-5687.20230041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous instruments have been developed around the world to assess stress. This study aimed to identify instruments with validation studies that mapping stress in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>an integrative review was carried out on databases and the Testing System of the Federal Council of Psychology (SATEPSI) in June 2017 and updated this year. Two independent judges participated in analyzing the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6,377 articles, 47 articles were selected from the Index Psi, SciELO, LILACS and PubMed databases, and 35 instruments made up the sample, two of which were from SATEPSI. Nine of these tools map stress in a more general way, nine are aimed at specific clinical contexts, 12 are aimed at occupational stress, three at the sports context and another two at other contexts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Numerous health problems are associated with early and chronic stressors, however it was identified that most instruments access stress in a more recent period of time (last year, month or week). A more accurate analysis of the relationships between longitudinal stress and health outcomes appears limited in this sense. The Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) appears as an alternative for studying stress throughout life in the Brazilian reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":519970,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de terapias cognitivas","volume":"19 Spec","pages":"122-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223748/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141556448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号