Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-21DOI: 10.1056/CAT.24.0420
Jennifer B Barrett, Ashley Trambley, Emily K Blessinger, Mitchell M Sexton, Marcella Lupica, Michele Hasselblad, Kelly E Cunningham, Sunil Kripalani, Neesha N Choma
Hospital readmission remains a common and costly event. For patients, hospital readmission is often associated with adverse outcomes in the short and long term. Despite broad interest in reducing hospital readmissions and the implementation of a wide range of programs to combat unplanned preventable readmissions, progress has been challenging. Multipronged, complex interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in published studies, yet they typically target a particular patient population (e.g., older adults), condition (e.g., heart failure), or hospital unit and are seldom implemented at the whole-hospital level. There is a pressing need for implementation studies of hospital-wide, comprehensive discharge care interventions. This article describes the design and first 2 years of implementation of the Discharge Care Center (DCC), a hospital-wide intervention designed to reduce readmissions at Vanderbilt University Hospital. Structured around a nurse-led Triage Team and a multidisciplinary Care Coordination Team specialized in post-discharge response to patient needs, the DCC utilizes a combination of automated surveillance and risk-based support to provide comprehensive and personalized coverage to adult patients discharged from the hospital to home. In its first 2 years of implementation, the DCC has cared for patients after 80,247 hospital discharges, providing 57,352 clinically relevant interventions. Vanderbilt University Hospital has seen a highly promising impact on readmissions, from a baseline (July 2019-June 2021) monthly mean 30-day unplanned readmission rate of 10.6% to a new rate of 9.9%, sustained for 2 consecutive years (July 2021-October 2023). This article presents the key functions of the DCC, the forms of implementation adopted, and practical advice for other healthcare systems aiming to implement a successful discharge care intervention at scale.
{"title":"Reduced Hospital Readmissions Through Personalized Care: Implementation of a Patient, Risk-Focused Hospital-Wide Discharge Care Center.","authors":"Jennifer B Barrett, Ashley Trambley, Emily K Blessinger, Mitchell M Sexton, Marcella Lupica, Michele Hasselblad, Kelly E Cunningham, Sunil Kripalani, Neesha N Choma","doi":"10.1056/CAT.24.0420","DOIUrl":"10.1056/CAT.24.0420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospital readmission remains a common and costly event. For patients, hospital readmission is often associated with adverse outcomes in the short and long term. Despite broad interest in reducing hospital readmissions and the implementation of a wide range of programs to combat unplanned preventable readmissions, progress has been challenging. Multipronged, complex interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in published studies, yet they typically target a particular patient population (e.g., older adults), condition (e.g., heart failure), or hospital unit and are seldom implemented at the whole-hospital level. There is a pressing need for implementation studies of <i>hospital-wide</i>, comprehensive discharge care interventions. This article describes the design and first 2 years of implementation of the Discharge Care Center (DCC), a hospital-wide intervention designed to reduce readmissions at Vanderbilt University Hospital. Structured around a nurse-led Triage Team and a multidisciplinary Care Coordination Team specialized in post-discharge response to patient needs, the DCC utilizes a combination of automated surveillance and risk-based support to provide comprehensive and personalized coverage to adult patients discharged from the hospital to home. In its first 2 years of implementation, the DCC has cared for patients after 80,247 hospital discharges, providing 57,352 clinically relevant interventions. Vanderbilt University Hospital has seen a highly promising impact on readmissions, from a baseline (July 2019-June 2021) monthly mean 30-day unplanned readmission rate of 10.6% to a new rate of 9.9%, sustained for 2 consecutive years (July 2021-October 2023). This article presents the key functions of the DCC, the forms of implementation adopted, and practical advice for other healthcare systems aiming to implement a successful discharge care intervention at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12622564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-14DOI: 10.1056/CAT.24.0412
Raj Vuppalanchi, Swetha Parvataneni, Loren Cihlar, Levi Longshore, Eric Orman, Archita P Desai, Naga Chalasani
The complexity of care for decompensated liver disease often necessitates the transfer of patients to tertiary care hospitals (TCHs) for management by advanced liver care teams. However, TCHs often have a wait list for transfers, which can lead to delays in timely care. These delays can increase the risk of medical errors, which can be compounded by the multiple handoffs and uncertainty during the transfer process. To address these limitations and reduce reliance on transfers, the Indiana University Health Hepatology team, based at the academic health center (AHC), implemented a remote inpatient telehepatology (INP-TH) consultation service for comanaging patients with advanced liver disease while they remain hospitalized at one of the integrated health care system's community hospitals. In this article, the authors describe the logistics, feasibility, and selected outcomes of the INP-TH service across three of the community hospitals. Multiple stakeholders at the community hospitals and from the health system leadership were engaged before establishing the service. The service was implemented at minimal additional cost, utilizing existing clinical staff and two patient-facing iPads at each community hospital. AHC-based dedicated inpatient hepatology physician assistants and hepatology attendings participated in the INP-TH consultations. Patients under evaluation in the ED or those receiving care in the ICU were not eligible for the INP-TH consultation request. The results presented are from the virtual consultations offered to 155 patients from July 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. On establishing INP-TH, only 12 patients (8%) were transferred to the AHC at the discretion of the INP-TH team for reasons related to the severity of illness or specialized services only available at the AHC; the other 143 (92%) were comanaged locally. Of the 155 patients, 57% had an outpatient hepatology follow-up within 30 days, 28% were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days, and 8% died within 30 days, which included nine as inpatients and four as outpatients. Provider engagement and satisfaction surveys revealed strong support and high satisfaction levels from both hepatology providers and hospitalists, with no readily evident risk to the patients. The INP-TH initiative models an approach for locally comanaging patients with complex or advanced diseases by establishing the feasibility and efficacy of comanagement of patients with decompensated cirrhosis at community hospitals without the need for physical transfer. To enhance its scale and breadth, the adaptation and expansion of the service to other health care systems should be explored.
{"title":"Inpatient Telehepatology at Community Hospitals: Expanding Access and Comanaging Complex Care.","authors":"Raj Vuppalanchi, Swetha Parvataneni, Loren Cihlar, Levi Longshore, Eric Orman, Archita P Desai, Naga Chalasani","doi":"10.1056/CAT.24.0412","DOIUrl":"10.1056/CAT.24.0412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The complexity of care for decompensated liver disease often necessitates the transfer of patients to tertiary care hospitals (TCHs) for management by advanced liver care teams. However, TCHs often have a wait list for transfers, which can lead to delays in timely care. These delays can increase the risk of medical errors, which can be compounded by the multiple handoffs and uncertainty during the transfer process. To address these limitations and reduce reliance on transfers, the Indiana University Health Hepatology team, based at the academic health center (AHC), implemented a remote inpatient telehepatology (INP-TH) consultation service for comanaging patients with advanced liver disease while they remain hospitalized at one of the integrated health care system's community hospitals. In this article, the authors describe the logistics, feasibility, and selected outcomes of the INP-TH service across three of the community hospitals. Multiple stakeholders at the community hospitals and from the health system leadership were engaged before establishing the service. The service was implemented at minimal additional cost, utilizing existing clinical staff and two patient-facing iPads at each community hospital. AHC-based dedicated inpatient hepatology physician assistants and hepatology attendings participated in the INP-TH consultations. Patients under evaluation in the ED or those receiving care in the ICU were not eligible for the INP-TH consultation request. The results presented are from the virtual consultations offered to 155 patients from July 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. On establishing INP-TH, only 12 patients (8%) were transferred to the AHC at the discretion of the INP-TH team for reasons related to the severity of illness or specialized services only available at the AHC; the other 143 (92%) were comanaged locally. Of the 155 patients, 57% had an outpatient hepatology follow-up within 30 days, 28% were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days, and 8% died within 30 days, which included nine as inpatients and four as outpatients. Provider engagement and satisfaction surveys revealed strong support and high satisfaction levels from both hepatology providers and hospitalists, with no readily evident risk to the patients. The INP-TH initiative models an approach for locally comanaging patients with complex or advanced diseases by establishing the feasibility and efficacy of comanagement of patients with decompensated cirrhosis at community hospitals without the need for physical transfer. To enhance its scale and breadth, the adaptation and expansion of the service to other health care systems should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707029/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145777132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
William G Weppner, Amy S Jeffreys, Cynthia J Coffman, Hayden B Bosworth, David Edelman, Matthew J Crowley
Health care systems are increasingly recognizing the environmental harms generated by medical care and are seeking to reduce their carbon footprints. They can accomplish measurable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining high quality and even improving care by pursuing cobenefits - programs that simultaneously reduce environmental harm and benefit patients' health. The authors describe Advanced Comprehensive Diabetes Care (ACDC), an evidence-based telehealth program for diabetes patients in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system that has concurrently improved patient care and reduced the VA's carbon footprint. Designed for patients with poor diabetes control, the program leverages existing clinical infrastructure to provide nurse-delivered telemonitoring, self-management support, and provider-aided medication management. ACDC has improved patient outcomes while reducing patient travel time, out-of-pocket costs, and greenhouse gas emissions. ACDC served 576 patients between 2017 and 2022. The authors estimate that the program has prevented over 200,000 miles of driving, saving around US$20,000 in gasoline costs for patients and 82 metric tons of carbon dioxide emission compared with equivalent in-person care. ACDC provides a template for improving health outcomes and patient as well as provider satisfaction while saving money and producing measurable reductions in carbon footprint.
{"title":"Decarbonizing Health Care: Measuring the Carbon Footprint Impact of a National VA Telehealth Program.","authors":"William G Weppner, Amy S Jeffreys, Cynthia J Coffman, Hayden B Bosworth, David Edelman, Matthew J Crowley","doi":"10.1056/CAT.24.0149","DOIUrl":"10.1056/CAT.24.0149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care systems are increasingly recognizing the environmental harms generated by medical care and are seeking to reduce their carbon footprints. They can accomplish measurable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining high quality and even improving care by pursuing cobenefits - programs that simultaneously reduce environmental harm and benefit patients' health. The authors describe Advanced Comprehensive Diabetes Care (ACDC), an evidence-based telehealth program for diabetes patients in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system that has concurrently improved patient care and reduced the VA's carbon footprint. Designed for patients with poor diabetes control, the program leverages existing clinical infrastructure to provide nurse-delivered telemonitoring, self-management support, and provider-aided medication management. ACDC has improved patient outcomes while reducing patient travel time, out-of-pocket costs, and greenhouse gas emissions. ACDC served 576 patients between 2017 and 2022. The authors estimate that the program has prevented over 200,000 miles of driving, saving around US$20,000 in gasoline costs for patients and 82 metric tons of carbon dioxide emission compared with equivalent in-person care. ACDC provides a template for improving health outcomes and patient as well as provider satisfaction while saving money and producing measurable reductions in carbon footprint.</p>","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077254/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144083140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1056/cat.24.0201
Erin M Bange, Kerry Q Coughlin, Wenrui Li, Timothy J Brown, Daniel Ragusano, Eesha Balar, Dhivya Arasappan, Michelle Nnaji, Elliot Kim, Corey Alban, Sindhuja Uppuluri, Elizabeth Moriarty, Tara Bange, Lindsey Zinck, David Smith, Michael Josephs, James J Harrigan, Roger B Cohen, Danielle Zubka, Roy Rosin, Mohan Balachandran, Qi Long, Andrea Bilger, Lynn M Schuchter, Mira Mamtani, Lawrence N Shulman, Carmen E Guerra, Ronac Mamtani
<p><p>Patients with cancer spend considerable time commuting to, waiting for, and receiving health care. Patient-reported outcomes have been collected electronically to monitor patients for toxicity related to treatment, but, to the authors' knowledge, they have not been used as a strategy to minimize patients' time spent on cancer care by streamlining care delivery. Researchers at Penn Medicine set an objective to assess the effectiveness and implementation of a text message-based symptom reporting electronic triage (e-triage) versus usual care to minimize the time toxicity associated with ambulatory cancer care. The methods employed included a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation, unblinded, randomized controlled trial and sequential mixed-methods study, which was conducted between December 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, with a follow-up period of 3 months or three visits (whichever came first, but all within the 2-year window). Adult patients with solid tumors receiving single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with access to a text-messaging device were enrolled, with a target sample size of 176. The intervention was a symptom-based e-triage via mobile text messaging combined with routine laboratory testing. Participants in the e-triage group with normal bloodwork and no symptoms of drug toxicity on e-triage were eligible to fast-track to ICI infusion, bypassing the pretreatment office visit. The primary end point was total time per ambulatory encounter; secondary end points included wait time, ED or hospital visits, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and implementation (reach and fidelity). Implementation readiness (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility), barriers, and facilitators were evaluated in a mixed-methods analysis among treating oncologists, measured via surveys and focus groups. For the study, 40 patients were randomly assigned, of which 31 were evaluated for the primary end point; the median age among the 40 participants was 67.5 years of age (interquartile range 59.5-71.5 years of age), 80.0% were male, and 84.6% were white. Those randomly assigned to the e-triage group of the pilot randomized controlled trial (n=19, n=16 evaluable) had an average of 66.0 minutes less total time (95% confidence interval [CI], -123.7 to -8.08 minutes; <i>P</i>=0.03) and 30.1 minutes less wait time (95% CI, -60.9 to 1.1 minutes; <i>P</i>=0.08) per encounter, than those in usual care (n=21 randomly assigned, n=15 evaluable). ED or hospital visits, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction scores were similar. In the mixed-methods study, oncologists (n=31, 17 completed the survey) found the e-triage acceptable (mean 3.8, standard error [SE] 0.1), appropriate (mean 3.8, SE 0.1), and feasible (mean 3.9, SE 0.1) on a 5-point Likert scale of agreeability. Perceived barriers to uptake included challenges in patient identification, potential for drug toxicity underreporting, and reimbursement conce
{"title":"A Text Message Intervention to Minimize the Time Burden of Cancer Care.","authors":"Erin M Bange, Kerry Q Coughlin, Wenrui Li, Timothy J Brown, Daniel Ragusano, Eesha Balar, Dhivya Arasappan, Michelle Nnaji, Elliot Kim, Corey Alban, Sindhuja Uppuluri, Elizabeth Moriarty, Tara Bange, Lindsey Zinck, David Smith, Michael Josephs, James J Harrigan, Roger B Cohen, Danielle Zubka, Roy Rosin, Mohan Balachandran, Qi Long, Andrea Bilger, Lynn M Schuchter, Mira Mamtani, Lawrence N Shulman, Carmen E Guerra, Ronac Mamtani","doi":"10.1056/cat.24.0201","DOIUrl":"10.1056/cat.24.0201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with cancer spend considerable time commuting to, waiting for, and receiving health care. Patient-reported outcomes have been collected electronically to monitor patients for toxicity related to treatment, but, to the authors' knowledge, they have not been used as a strategy to minimize patients' time spent on cancer care by streamlining care delivery. Researchers at Penn Medicine set an objective to assess the effectiveness and implementation of a text message-based symptom reporting electronic triage (e-triage) versus usual care to minimize the time toxicity associated with ambulatory cancer care. The methods employed included a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation, unblinded, randomized controlled trial and sequential mixed-methods study, which was conducted between December 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, with a follow-up period of 3 months or three visits (whichever came first, but all within the 2-year window). Adult patients with solid tumors receiving single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with access to a text-messaging device were enrolled, with a target sample size of 176. The intervention was a symptom-based e-triage via mobile text messaging combined with routine laboratory testing. Participants in the e-triage group with normal bloodwork and no symptoms of drug toxicity on e-triage were eligible to fast-track to ICI infusion, bypassing the pretreatment office visit. The primary end point was total time per ambulatory encounter; secondary end points included wait time, ED or hospital visits, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and implementation (reach and fidelity). Implementation readiness (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility), barriers, and facilitators were evaluated in a mixed-methods analysis among treating oncologists, measured via surveys and focus groups. For the study, 40 patients were randomly assigned, of which 31 were evaluated for the primary end point; the median age among the 40 participants was 67.5 years of age (interquartile range 59.5-71.5 years of age), 80.0% were male, and 84.6% were white. Those randomly assigned to the e-triage group of the pilot randomized controlled trial (n=19, n=16 evaluable) had an average of 66.0 minutes less total time (95% confidence interval [CI], -123.7 to -8.08 minutes; <i>P</i>=0.03) and 30.1 minutes less wait time (95% CI, -60.9 to 1.1 minutes; <i>P</i>=0.08) per encounter, than those in usual care (n=21 randomly assigned, n=15 evaluable). ED or hospital visits, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction scores were similar. In the mixed-methods study, oncologists (n=31, 17 completed the survey) found the e-triage acceptable (mean 3.8, standard error [SE] 0.1), appropriate (mean 3.8, SE 0.1), and feasible (mean 3.9, SE 0.1) on a 5-point Likert scale of agreeability. Perceived barriers to uptake included challenges in patient identification, potential for drug toxicity underreporting, and reimbursement conce","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276887/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1056/cat.24.0194
Antoinette Schoenthaler, Radeyah Hack, Soumik Mandal, Franze De La Calle, Arielle Elmaleh-Sachs, Jacalyn Nay, Doreen Colella, Valy Fontil, George Shahin, Isaac Dapkins
<p><p>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been shown to support adults with treated but uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) outside the clinic setting, yielding significant benefits in the treatment and control of blood pressure (BP). Despite its proven efficacy and recommendation as guideline-concordant care, adoption of RPM is suboptimal, particularly among marginalized populations, who face structural barriers to HTN control. A barrier to equitable adoption among marginalized populations is the lack of digital inclusivity in the design and deployment of RPM. Digitally inclusive tools consider factors such as affordability, access, digital literacy, and skills. To address this challenge, the authors describe a digitally inclusive model of RPM for HTN management within the Family Health Centers (FHCs) at NYU Langone, a federally qualified health center (FQHC) that serves more than 110,000 patients each year. The model uses protocols from the Target: BP initiative in combination with team-based care and digitally inclusive strategies to improve HTN control. Specifically, care teams work collaboratively to identify patients with uncontrolled HTN and order RPM using electronic health record-embedded clinical decision support; provide patients with free home BP monitors and training in accurate BP measurement; deliver language-concordant health coaching and optimize the antihypertensive regimen via a virtual high-risk clinic (VHRC); and monitor patient progress through shared communications. Patients also receive support from community health workers (CHWs) to address digital barriers and unmet social needs. The authors present utilization and preliminary outcome data of their model, involving 429 patients who were enrolled in RPM and the VHRC across five FHC practices between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023. Enrolled patients attended a mean of 4.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.5) visits with a nurse practitioner for medication adjustments and counseling; 5.7 (SD: 0.5) health coaching visits with a nurse; and 1 visit (SD: 0.2) with a CHW for digital and social needs over a mean of 5.7 months (SD: 0.8). Enrolled patients sent a mean number of 65 BP readings (SD: 96.4) over their period of participation. On average, enrolled patients exhibited a -13.5/-8.0 mmHg reduction from their enrollment date to the date that they were discharged from the VHRC (approximately 5.7 months). This is in comparison to a -0.5/+0.6 mmHg change in mean BP exhibited by patients with uncontrolled HTN not enrolled in the Advancing Long-term Improvements in Hypertension Outcomes through a Team-based Care Approach (ALTA) program and receiving care at the practices during the same period (n=2,843). Across the practices, BP control had also increased from the pre-ALTA baseline period (January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021) of 68.44%-82.99%, by the end of December 31, 2023, among all patients with uncontrolled HTN. While the implementation of this digitally inclusive RPM model
{"title":"Closing Hypertension Equity Gaps Through Digitally Inclusive Remote Patient Monitoring.","authors":"Antoinette Schoenthaler, Radeyah Hack, Soumik Mandal, Franze De La Calle, Arielle Elmaleh-Sachs, Jacalyn Nay, Doreen Colella, Valy Fontil, George Shahin, Isaac Dapkins","doi":"10.1056/cat.24.0194","DOIUrl":"10.1056/cat.24.0194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been shown to support adults with treated but uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) outside the clinic setting, yielding significant benefits in the treatment and control of blood pressure (BP). Despite its proven efficacy and recommendation as guideline-concordant care, adoption of RPM is suboptimal, particularly among marginalized populations, who face structural barriers to HTN control. A barrier to equitable adoption among marginalized populations is the lack of digital inclusivity in the design and deployment of RPM. Digitally inclusive tools consider factors such as affordability, access, digital literacy, and skills. To address this challenge, the authors describe a digitally inclusive model of RPM for HTN management within the Family Health Centers (FHCs) at NYU Langone, a federally qualified health center (FQHC) that serves more than 110,000 patients each year. The model uses protocols from the Target: BP initiative in combination with team-based care and digitally inclusive strategies to improve HTN control. Specifically, care teams work collaboratively to identify patients with uncontrolled HTN and order RPM using electronic health record-embedded clinical decision support; provide patients with free home BP monitors and training in accurate BP measurement; deliver language-concordant health coaching and optimize the antihypertensive regimen via a virtual high-risk clinic (VHRC); and monitor patient progress through shared communications. Patients also receive support from community health workers (CHWs) to address digital barriers and unmet social needs. The authors present utilization and preliminary outcome data of their model, involving 429 patients who were enrolled in RPM and the VHRC across five FHC practices between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023. Enrolled patients attended a mean of 4.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.5) visits with a nurse practitioner for medication adjustments and counseling; 5.7 (SD: 0.5) health coaching visits with a nurse; and 1 visit (SD: 0.2) with a CHW for digital and social needs over a mean of 5.7 months (SD: 0.8). Enrolled patients sent a mean number of 65 BP readings (SD: 96.4) over their period of participation. On average, enrolled patients exhibited a -13.5/-8.0 mmHg reduction from their enrollment date to the date that they were discharged from the VHRC (approximately 5.7 months). This is in comparison to a -0.5/+0.6 mmHg change in mean BP exhibited by patients with uncontrolled HTN not enrolled in the Advancing Long-term Improvements in Hypertension Outcomes through a Team-based Care Approach (ALTA) program and receiving care at the practices during the same period (n=2,843). Across the practices, BP control had also increased from the pre-ALTA baseline period (January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021) of 68.44%-82.99%, by the end of December 31, 2023, among all patients with uncontrolled HTN. While the implementation of this digitally inclusive RPM model ","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12746073/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145867223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.1056/CAT.24.0095
Emma Brady, Ryan C Perkins, Kate Cullen, Gregory S Sawicki, Robert S Kaplan, Gerardine Doyle
Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects more than 160,000 individuals globally and has seen improved survival rates due to multidisciplinary care models and pharmacotherapy innovations. However, the associated costs remain substantial, prompting the authors to study and evaluate the expense of CF ambulatory care to understand how care structure influences costs. People with CF (PwCF) at large pediatric CF centers in both the United States and Ireland were recruited for parallel observational, prospective studies. Based upon the process of care, the lead clinicians at both sites identified and agreed on three strata of patients (0-11 months, 1-5 years, and 6-17 years of age). Process maps were developed for each of the age cohorts at each site, and the costs of ambulatory care - with emphasis on routine CF clinic visits - were measured utilizing time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). A dollar-per-minute capacity cost rate (CCR) was calculated for all resources used in the care cycle. The total direct cost was obtained by multiplying the CCR for each resource by the time the resource was used during the patient's care cycle. The cost was summed across all resource types to obtain the cost over the entire care cycle for each site. Service operations were benchmarked to one site and variance analysis was performed. In total, 58 PwCF were included in the analysis (49 in the United States and 9 in Ireland); 4 were 0-11 months, 17 were 1-5 years, and 37 were 6-17 years of age. Physicians (United States) and respiratory consultants (Ireland) had the highest CCRs. Physicians and registered dietitians spent the most time with patients in the United States, compared with the clinical nurse specialists and dietitians in Ireland. The total variance in cost for clinical visits was largest in the 6- to 17-year-old group (28% variance, with 100% in the United States vs. 128% in Ireland). In the 6- to 17-year-old group, the largest drivers in total variance were quantity variance (variance in duration of time spent with patients), which was 108% greater in Ireland); the skill mix variance (variance in clinician type performing service for a given time), which was 49% greater in the United States; and the rate variance (variance in compensation levels across sites), which was 31% greater in the United States. The authors' use of TDABC to characterize the cost of multidisciplinary care during ambulatory clinic visits for PwCF, in combination with variance analysis (the quantitative investigation of the difference between actual and expected costs), provides new and innovative ways to compare costs across similar health care service delivery sites, providing insights into the distinctive features of each. A granular understanding of cost and comparison of resource utilization between centers provides valuable, organizationally relevant insights.
{"title":"Innovations in Evaluating Ambulatory Costs of Cystic Fibrosis Care: A Comparative Study Across Multidisciplinary Care Centers in Ireland and the United States.","authors":"Emma Brady, Ryan C Perkins, Kate Cullen, Gregory S Sawicki, Robert S Kaplan, Gerardine Doyle","doi":"10.1056/CAT.24.0095","DOIUrl":"10.1056/CAT.24.0095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects more than 160,000 individuals globally and has seen improved survival rates due to multidisciplinary care models and pharmacotherapy innovations. However, the associated costs remain substantial, prompting the authors to study and evaluate the expense of CF ambulatory care to understand how care structure influences costs. People with CF (PwCF) at large pediatric CF centers in both the United States and Ireland were recruited for parallel observational, prospective studies. Based upon the process of care, the lead clinicians at both sites identified and agreed on three strata of patients (0-11 months, 1-5 years, and 6-17 years of age). Process maps were developed for each of the age cohorts at each site, and the costs of ambulatory care - with emphasis on routine CF clinic visits - were measured utilizing time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). A dollar-per-minute capacity cost rate (CCR) was calculated for all resources used in the care cycle. The total direct cost was obtained by multiplying the CCR for each resource by the time the resource was used during the patient's care cycle. The cost was summed across all resource types to obtain the cost over the entire care cycle for each site. Service operations were benchmarked to one site and variance analysis was performed. In total, 58 PwCF were included in the analysis (49 in the United States and 9 in Ireland); 4 were 0-11 months, 17 were 1-5 years, and 37 were 6-17 years of age. Physicians (United States) and respiratory consultants (Ireland) had the highest CCRs. Physicians and registered dietitians spent the most time with patients in the United States, compared with the clinical nurse specialists and dietitians in Ireland. The total variance in cost for clinical visits was largest in the 6- to 17-year-old group (28% variance, with 100% in the United States vs. 128% in Ireland). In the 6- to 17-year-old group, the largest drivers in total variance were quantity variance (variance in duration of time spent with patients), which was 108% greater in Ireland); the skill mix variance (variance in clinician type performing service for a given time), which was 49% greater in the United States; and the rate variance (variance in compensation levels across sites), which was 31% greater in the United States. The authors' use of TDABC to characterize the cost of multidisciplinary care during ambulatory clinic visits for PwCF, in combination with variance analysis (the quantitative investigation of the difference between actual and expected costs), provides new and innovative ways to compare costs across similar health care service delivery sites, providing insights into the distinctive features of each. A granular understanding of cost and comparison of resource utilization between centers provides valuable, organizationally relevant insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143766230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-21DOI: 10.1056/CAT.24.0140
Dinee C Simpson, Joy E Obayemi, Kiarri N Kershaw, John E Franklin, Daniela P Ladner
Black Americans experience end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) at a disproportionately higher rate than other racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Kidney transplantation provides the best outcomes for patients with ESKD. However, Black patients frequently have decreased access to kidney transplantation. This article summarizes the robust literature on disparities in transplantation for Black patients and presents a practical solution to this complex issue by redesigning the transplant access process for Black patients challenged by structural and institutional barriers. The authors provide a detailed overview of a novel African American Transplant Access Program (AATAP) with its pillars of cultural congruency, trust, health literacy, and psychosocial support. This overview includes a thorough description of the program's conceptualization, the process of creating the program, the preliminary results, and guidance to establish similarly culturally congruent transplant access programs.
{"title":"The African American Transplant Access Program: Mitigating Disparities in Solid Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Dinee C Simpson, Joy E Obayemi, Kiarri N Kershaw, John E Franklin, Daniela P Ladner","doi":"10.1056/CAT.24.0140","DOIUrl":"10.1056/CAT.24.0140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black Americans experience end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) at a disproportionately higher rate than other racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Kidney transplantation provides the best outcomes for patients with ESKD. However, Black patients frequently have decreased access to kidney transplantation. This article summarizes the robust literature on disparities in transplantation for Black patients and presents a practical solution to this complex issue by redesigning the transplant access process for Black patients challenged by structural and institutional barriers. The authors provide a detailed overview of a novel African American Transplant Access Program (AATAP) with its pillars of cultural congruency, trust, health literacy, and psychosocial support. This overview includes a thorough description of the program's conceptualization, the process of creating the program, the preliminary results, and guidance to establish similarly culturally congruent transplant access programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520273,"journal":{"name":"NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery","volume":"5 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526762/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142560309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}