Objectives: The overall goal of this article is to show that denial is one of the greatest obstacles to good practical judgment and is therefore a major problem in clinical ethics by examining its cognitive structure and the challenges it poses for clinical ethics consultation and intervention. In addition to clinical examples, excerpts of verbatim from citizen forums on triage protocols will be used to illustrate the manifestations of denial in citizens when faced with difficult choices.
Case presentation: The initial waves of the pandemic and the alarming resurgence of cases with the emergence of highly transmissible variants have created increased pressure on many healthcare systems around the world. These critical situations have activated the potential for health authorities in different countries to use triage protocols to manage access to critical care. In several cases, public opinion was alerted, creating a climate of concern and even suspicion among the general population. These debates have highlighted both the importance and the difficulty of basing triage choices and the allocation of scarce resources on an ethical or moral reasoning that commands strong support. The obstacles to this consensus are numerous. There is, of course, the diversity of beliefs and values, but also a mechanism that has been very little documented in clinical ethics: denial.
Conclusions: Denial poses major problems for providers and professionals in healthcare settings. In the face of maladaptive behaviors such as denial, psychotherapy uses techniques that act on both the cognitive and affective levels. Many of these techniques require long-term work that can only be accomplished in the context of professionally supervised therapy, but some tips can be identified for mediation and the work of the clinical ethicist.
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号