We develop our argument in five steps. The first section retraces the evolving interaction between peace research and politics. It recalls some of the central features of critical peace research as well as the articulation between norms and causal assumptions. The second and third sections expound what we call the bureaucratisation of positive peace by governments and NGOs at both the institutional and ideational levels. We draw attention to how peacebuilding has been institutionalized in diplomatic and aid organizations and how it propagates a set of received wisdoms about peace. In the fourth section we problematize a number of paradoxes of state sponsored peacebuilding from the viewpoint of critical peace research. Finally, we offer a number of concluding observations on the role of peace researchers and some suggestions how a tradition of critical peace research could be reinvigorated to fruitfully engage with contemporary peace issues.
{"title":"Rethinking Peace, Peace Research and Peacebuilding","authors":"L. Goetschel, T. Hagmann","doi":"10.5167/UZH-59598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-59598","url":null,"abstract":"We develop our argument in five steps. The first section retraces the evolving interaction between peace research and politics. It recalls some of the central features of critical peace research as well as the articulation between norms and causal assumptions. The second and third sections expound what we call the bureaucratisation of positive peace by governments and NGOs at both the institutional and ideational levels. We draw attention to how peacebuilding has been institutionalized in diplomatic and aid organizations and how it propagates a set of received wisdoms about peace. In the fourth section we problematize a number of paradoxes of state sponsored peacebuilding from the viewpoint of critical peace research. Finally, we offer a number of concluding observations on the role of peace researchers and some suggestions how a tradition of critical peace research could be reinvigorated to fruitfully engage with contemporary peace issues.","PeriodicalId":52448,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Politik","volume":"8 1 1","pages":"45-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78921898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Keine Stabilität durch Instabilität: die paradoxe Ressourcendiplomatie Chinas","authors":"C. Brütsch, M. Hulbert","doi":"10.5167/UZH-43624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-43624","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52448,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Politik","volume":"42 3 1","pages":"79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82764909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Was in Seattle zu Bruch gegangen ist, so die eher skeptischen Wissenschaftler von der Universitat Zurich, kann nicht rasch repariert werden. Weder von den USA noch von der EU sind z.Z. Fuhrung oder Konzessionen zu erwarten; die Interessengegensatze der wichtigen Handelsnationen verhindern eine nennenswerte Reform.
{"title":"Alternativen zu einer neuen WTO-Runde","authors":"Dieter Ruloff, M. Elsig","doi":"10.5167/UZH-20955","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-20955","url":null,"abstract":"Was in Seattle zu Bruch gegangen ist, so die eher skeptischen Wissenschaftler von der Universitat Zurich, kann nicht rasch repariert werden. Weder von den USA noch von der EU sind z.Z. Fuhrung oder Konzessionen zu erwarten; die Interessengegensatze der wichtigen Handelsnationen verhindern eine nennenswerte Reform.","PeriodicalId":52448,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Politik","volume":"934 1","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85600420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：