首页 > 最新文献

Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)最新文献

英文 中文
The Delphi Delirium Management Algorithms. A practical tool for clinicians, the result of a modified Delphi expert consensus approach. 德尔菲谵妄管理算法。临床医生的实用工具,是修改后的德尔菲专家共识法的成果。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI: 10.56392/001c.90652
Thomas H Ottens, Carsten Hermes, Valerie Page, Mark Oldham, Rakesh Arora, O Joseph Bienvenu, Mark van den Boogaard, Gideon Caplan, John W Devlin, Michaela-Elena Friedrich, Willem A van Gool, James Hanison, Hans-Christian Hansen, Sharon K Inouye, Barbara Kamholz, Katarzyna Kotfis, Matthew B Maas, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Edward R Marcantonio, Alessandro Morandi, Barbara C van Munster, Ursula Müller-Werdan, Alessandra Negro, Karin J Neufeld, Peter Nydahl, Esther S Oh, Pratik Pandharipande, Finn M Radtke, Sylvie De Raedt, Lisa J Rosenthal, Robert Sanders, Claudia D Spies, Emma R L C Vardy, Eelco F Wijdicks, Arjen J C Slooter

Delirium is common in hospitalised patients, and there is currently no specific treatment. Identifying and treating underlying somatic causes of delirium is the first priority once delirium is diagnosed. Several international guidelines provide clinicians with an evidence-based approach to screening, diagnosis and symptomatic treatment. However, current guidelines do not offer a structured approach to identification of underlying causes. A panel of 37 internationally recognised delirium experts from diverse medical backgrounds worked together in a modified Delphi approach via an online platform. Consensus was reached after five voting rounds. The final product of this project is a set of three delirium management algorithms (the Delirium Delphi Algorithms), one for ward patients, one for patients after cardiac surgery and one for patients in the intensive care unit.

谵妄在住院病人中很常见,目前还没有专门的治疗方法。一旦确诊谵妄,首要任务是找出并治疗导致谵妄的潜在躯体病因。一些国际指南为临床医生提供了筛查、诊断和对症治疗的循证方法。然而,目前的指南并没有提供识别潜在病因的结构化方法。由 37 位来自不同医学背景的国际知名谵妄专家组成的专家小组通过在线平台,采用改良的德尔菲法共同开展工作。经过五轮投票,最终达成共识。该项目的最终成果是三套谵妄管理算法(谵妄德尔菲算法),一套适用于病房患者,一套适用于心脏手术后患者,一套适用于重症监护室患者。
{"title":"The Delphi Delirium Management Algorithms. A practical tool for clinicians, the result of a modified Delphi expert consensus approach.","authors":"Thomas H Ottens, Carsten Hermes, Valerie Page, Mark Oldham, Rakesh Arora, O Joseph Bienvenu, Mark van den Boogaard, Gideon Caplan, John W Devlin, Michaela-Elena Friedrich, Willem A van Gool, James Hanison, Hans-Christian Hansen, Sharon K Inouye, Barbara Kamholz, Katarzyna Kotfis, Matthew B Maas, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Edward R Marcantonio, Alessandro Morandi, Barbara C van Munster, Ursula Müller-Werdan, Alessandra Negro, Karin J Neufeld, Peter Nydahl, Esther S Oh, Pratik Pandharipande, Finn M Radtke, Sylvie De Raedt, Lisa J Rosenthal, Robert Sanders, Claudia D Spies, Emma R L C Vardy, Eelco F Wijdicks, Arjen J C Slooter","doi":"10.56392/001c.90652","DOIUrl":"10.56392/001c.90652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delirium is common in hospitalised patients, and there is currently no specific treatment. Identifying and treating underlying somatic causes of delirium is the first priority once delirium is diagnosed. Several international guidelines provide clinicians with an evidence-based approach to screening, diagnosis and symptomatic treatment. However, current guidelines do not offer a structured approach to identification of underlying causes. A panel of 37 internationally recognised delirium experts from diverse medical backgrounds worked together in a modified Delphi approach via an online platform. Consensus was reached after five voting rounds. The final product of this project is a set of three delirium management algorithms (the Delirium Delphi Algorithms), one for ward patients, one for patients after cardiac surgery and one for patients in the intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":72775,"journal":{"name":"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)","volume":"2024 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10861222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139725153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effects of computerised cognitive training on post-CABG delirium and cognitive change: A prospective randomised controlled trial. 计算机化认知训练对心血管造影术后谵妄和认知变化的影响:前瞻性随机对照试验
Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI: 10.56392/001c.67976
Danielle Greaves, Jack Astley, Peter J Psaltis, Amit Lampit, Daniel Hj Davis, Erica S Ghezzi, Ashleigh E Smith, Alice Bourke, Michael G Worthington, Michael J Valenzuela, Hannah Ad Keage

Background: Cognitive impairments, including delirium, are common after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Improving cognition pre- and post-operatively using computerised cognitive training (CCT) may be an effective approach to improve cognitive outcomes in CABG patients.

Objectives: Investigate the effect of remotely supervised CCT on cognitive outcomes, including delirium, in older adults undergoing CABG surgery.

Methods: Thirty-six participants, were analysed in a single-blinded randomised controlled trial (CCT Intervention: n = 18, Control: n = 18). CCT was completed by the intervention group pre-operatively (every other day, 45-60-minute sessions until surgery) and post-operatively, beginning 1-month post-CABG (3 x 45-60-minute sessions/week for 12-weeks), while the control group maintained usual care plus weekly phone calls. Cognitive assessments were conducted pre- and post-operatively at multiple follow-ups (discharge, 4-months and 6-months). Post-operative delirium incidence was assessed daily until discharge. Cognitive change data were calculated at each follow-up for each cognitive test (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III and CANTAB; z-scored).

Results: Adherence to the CCT intervention (completion of three pre-operative or 66% of post-operative sessions) was achieved in 68% of pre-CABG and 59% of post-CABG participants. There were no statistically significant effects of CCT on any cognitive outcome, including delirium incidence.

Conclusion: Adherence to the CCT program was comparatively higher than previous feasibility studies, possibly due to the level of supervision and support provided (blend of face-to-face and home-based training, with support phone calls). Implementing CCT interventions both pre- and post-operatively is feasible in those undergoing CABG. No statistically significant benefits from the CCT interventions were identified for delirium or cognitive function post-CABG, likely due to the sample size available (study recruitment greatly impacted by COVID-19). It also may be the case that multimodal intervention would be more effective.

背景:认知障碍(包括谵妄)是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的常见症状。利用计算机认知训练(CCT)提高术前和术后的认知能力可能是改善冠状动脉旁路移植术患者认知结果的有效方法:调查远程监督 CCT 对接受 CABG 手术的老年人认知结果(包括谵妄)的影响:在一项单盲随机对照试验中,对 36 名参与者进行了分析(CCT 干预组:18 人,对照组:18 人)。干预组在术前完成 CCT(每隔一天一次,每次 45-60 分钟,直到手术为止),并在手术后 1 个月开始进行 CCT(每周 3 次,每次 45-60 分钟,共 12 周),而对照组则保持常规护理,外加每周电话联系。术前和术后的多次随访(出院、4 个月和 6 个月)均进行了认知评估。每天评估术后谵妄发生率,直至出院。在每次随访时计算每次认知测试(Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III 和 CANTAB;z-scored)的认知变化数据:68%的CABG术前参与者和59%的CABG术后参与者坚持了CCT干预(完成术前三次或术后66%的疗程)。CCT对任何认知结果(包括谵妄发生率)都没有统计学意义上的影响:与之前的可行性研究相比,CCT 计划的坚持率相对较高,这可能是由于所提供的监督和支持水平(面对面培训和上门培训相结合,并提供电话支持)。在接受 CABG 手术的患者中,术前和术后实施 CCT 干预是可行的。CCT 干预措施对 CABG 术后谵妄或认知功能没有统计学意义上的明显益处,这可能与可用样本量有关(研究招募受到 COVID-19 的极大影响)。此外,多模式干预可能会更加有效。
{"title":"The effects of computerised cognitive training on post-CABG delirium and cognitive change: A prospective randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Danielle Greaves, Jack Astley, Peter J Psaltis, Amit Lampit, Daniel Hj Davis, Erica S Ghezzi, Ashleigh E Smith, Alice Bourke, Michael G Worthington, Michael J Valenzuela, Hannah Ad Keage","doi":"10.56392/001c.67976","DOIUrl":"10.56392/001c.67976","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairments, including delirium, are common after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Improving cognition pre- and post-operatively using computerised cognitive training (CCT) may be an effective approach to improve cognitive outcomes in CABG patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate the effect of remotely supervised CCT on cognitive outcomes, including delirium, in older adults undergoing CABG surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six participants, were analysed in a single-blinded randomised controlled trial (CCT Intervention: n = 18, Control: n = 18). CCT was completed by the intervention group pre-operatively (every other day, 45-60-minute sessions until surgery) and post-operatively, beginning 1-month post-CABG (3 x 45-60-minute sessions/week for 12-weeks), while the control group maintained usual care plus weekly phone calls. Cognitive assessments were conducted pre- and post-operatively at multiple follow-ups (discharge, 4-months and 6-months). Post-operative delirium incidence was assessed daily until discharge. Cognitive change data were calculated at each follow-up for each cognitive test (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III and CANTAB; z-scored).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adherence to the CCT intervention (completion of three pre-operative or 66% of post-operative sessions) was achieved in 68% of pre-CABG and 59% of post-CABG participants. There were no statistically significant effects of CCT on any cognitive outcome, including delirium incidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to the CCT program was comparatively higher than previous feasibility studies, possibly due to the level of supervision and support provided (blend of face-to-face and home-based training, with support phone calls). Implementing CCT interventions both pre- and post-operatively is feasible in those undergoing CABG. No statistically significant benefits from the CCT interventions were identified for delirium or cognitive function post-CABG, likely due to the sample size available (study recruitment greatly impacted by COVID-19). It also may be the case that multimodal intervention would be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":72775,"journal":{"name":"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)","volume":"1 ","pages":"67976"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614332/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9204069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. 老年住院病人的持续谵妄:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI: 10.56392/001c.36822
Jonathan Whitby, Anita Nitchingham, Gideon Caplan, Daniel Davis, Alex Tsui

Introduction: Delirium is associated with future dementia progression. Yet whether this occurs subclinically over months and years, or persistent delirium merges into worsened dementia is not understood. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of persistent delirium and understand variation in its duration.

Methods: We adopted an identical search strategy to a previous systematic review, only including studies using a recognised diagnostic framework for ascertaining delirium at follow-up (persistent delirium). Studies included hospitalised older patients outside critical and palliative care settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 11th January 2022. We applied risk of bias assessments based on Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders criteria and assessed strength of recommendations using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Estimates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis, and we estimated associations with follow-up duration using robust error meta-regression.

Results: We identified 13 new cohorts, which we added to 10 from the previous systematic review (23 relevant studies, with 39 reports of persistent delirium at 7 time-points in 3186 individuals admitted to hospital care (mean age 82 years and 41% dementia prevalence). Studies were mainly at moderate risk of bias. Pooled delirium prevalence estimates at discharge were 36% (95% CI 22% to 51%, 13 studies). Robust error meta-regression did not show variation in prevalence of persistent delirium over time (-1.6% per month, 95% CI -4.8 to 1.6, p=0.08). Margins estimates for this model indicate a prevalence of persistent delirium of 16% (95% CI 6% to 25%) at 12 months.

Conclusions: This systematic review emphasises the importance of delirium as a persistent and extensive problem (GRADE certainty = moderate), raising questions on chronic delirium as a clinical entity and how it might evolve into dementia. Addressing persistent delirium will require a whole-system, integrated approach to detect, follow-up and implement opportunities for recovery across all healthcare settings.

导言谵妄与未来痴呆症的发展有关。然而,这种情况是在数月或数年的亚临床状态下发生,还是持续性谵妄与痴呆症恶化合二为一,目前尚不清楚。我们的目标是估算持续性谵妄的患病率并了解其持续时间的变化:我们采用了与之前的系统综述相同的检索策略,仅纳入了使用公认诊断框架确定随访谵妄(持续性谵妄)的研究。研究对象包括危重症和姑息治疗机构以外的住院老年患者。我们于 2022 年 1 月 11 日检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 系统综述数据库。我们根据《神经系统疾病报告标准》进行了偏倚风险评估,并采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)评估了建议力度。采用随机效应荟萃分析法对各项研究的结果进行汇总,并采用稳健误差荟萃回归法估算随访时间的相关性:我们发现了 13 项新的队列研究,与之前系统综述中的 10 项队列研究进行了补充(23 项相关研究,在 7 个时间点对 3186 名住院患者(平均年龄 82 岁,痴呆症患病率为 41%)的持续谵妄进行了 39 项报告)。研究主要存在中度偏倚风险。出院时谵妄患病率的汇总估计值为 36%(95% CI 22% 至 51%,13 项研究)。稳健误差元回归并未显示持续谵妄患病率随时间的变化(每月-1.6%,95% CI -4.8至1.6,P=0.08)。该模型的边际估计值显示,12个月后持续谵妄的发生率为16%(95% CI为6%至25%):本系统综述强调了谵妄作为一种持续性和广泛性问题的重要性(GRADE确定性=中度),提出了慢性谵妄作为一种临床实体及其如何演变为痴呆的问题。要解决持续性谵妄问题,就需要在所有医疗机构中采用全系统的综合方法来检测、跟踪和实施康复机会。
{"title":"Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jonathan Whitby, Anita Nitchingham, Gideon Caplan, Daniel Davis, Alex Tsui","doi":"10.56392/001c.36822","DOIUrl":"10.56392/001c.36822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is associated with future dementia progression. Yet whether this occurs subclinically over months and years, or persistent delirium merges into worsened dementia is not understood. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of persistent delirium and understand variation in its duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted an identical search strategy to a previous systematic review, only including studies using a recognised diagnostic framework for ascertaining delirium at follow-up (persistent delirium). Studies included hospitalised older patients outside critical and palliative care settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 11th January 2022. We applied risk of bias assessments based on Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders criteria and assessed strength of recommendations using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Estimates were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis, and we estimated associations with follow-up duration using robust error meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 13 new cohorts, which we added to 10 from the previous systematic review (23 relevant studies, with 39 reports of persistent delirium at 7 time-points in 3186 individuals admitted to hospital care (mean age 82 years and 41% dementia prevalence). Studies were mainly at moderate risk of bias. Pooled delirium prevalence estimates at discharge were 36% (95% CI 22% to 51%, 13 studies). Robust error meta-regression did not show variation in prevalence of persistent delirium over time (-1.6% per month, 95% CI -4.8 to 1.6, p=0.08). Margins estimates for this model indicate a prevalence of persistent delirium of 16% (95% CI 6% to 25%) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review emphasises the importance of delirium as a persistent and extensive problem (GRADE certainty = moderate), raising questions on chronic delirium as a clinical entity and how it might evolve into dementia. Addressing persistent delirium will require a whole-system, integrated approach to detect, follow-up and implement opportunities for recovery across all healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72775,"journal":{"name":"Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)","volume":"1 ","pages":"36822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614331/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9204071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany)
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1