首页 > 最新文献

Journal of health economics and development最新文献

英文 中文
Parental Educational Attainment and Academic Performance of American College Students; Blacks' Diminished Returns. 父母的教育程度与美国大学生的学习成绩;黑人的收益减少。
Shervin Assari

Background: As suggested by the Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDR) theory, socioeconomic status (SES) systemically results in smaller outcomes for non-Whites compared to Whites. We still know very little about diminished trans-generational returns of SES resources such as parental educational attainment (PEA).

Purpose: This cross-sectional study explored racial variation in the effect of PEA on the college students' grade point average (GPA) in the US.

Methods: The Healthy Mind Study (HMS, 2016-2017) is a national telephone of college students in the US. The total sample was 18,072 domestic undergraduate college students who were either non-Hispanic Whites (n = 16,718; %92.50) or non-Hispanic Blacks (n = 1,354; %7.50). The independent variable was PEA. The main outcome was GPA measured using self-reported data. Age, gender, sexual orientation, transgender status, and financial difficulty were covariates. Race/ethnicity was the effect modifier. Linear regression models were used to analyze the data.

Results: Overall, higher PEA was associated with a higher GPA, independent of all possible confounders. Race/ethnicity, however, showed a significant interaction with PEA on students' GPA, indicating a smaller positive effect of PEA on non-Hispanic Blacks compared to non-Hispanic Whites college students' GPA. Race/ethnicity stratified models also showed a larger effect for White than Black students.

Conclusions: The boosting effect of PEA in GPA is smaller for Black compared to White college students. US should systematically reduce extra costs of upward social mobility for racial and ethnic minority families.

背景:正如 "少数族裔回报递减"(MDR)理论所指出的,社会经济地位(SES)系统性地导致非白人的结果小于白人。目的:本横断面研究探讨了父母教育程度(PEA)对美国大学生平均学分绩点(GPA)影响的种族差异:健康心理研究(HMS,2016-2017 年)是一项针对美国大学生的全国性电话调查。样本总数为 18072 名国内本科大学生,他们是非西班牙裔白人(n = 16718;%92.50)或非西班牙裔黑人(n = 1354;%7.50)。自变量为 PEA。主要结果是通过自我报告数据测量的 GPA。年龄、性别、性取向、变性身份和经济困难是协变量。种族/民族是效应调节因子。采用线性回归模型对数据进行分析:总体而言,较高的 PEA 与较高的 GPA 相关,与所有可能的混杂因素无关。然而,种族/人种与 PEA 对学生的 GPA 有显著的交互作用,这表明与非西班牙裔白人相比,PEA 对非西班牙裔黑人大学生 GPA 的积极影响较小。种族/民族分层模型也显示,白人学生的影响大于黑人学生:结论:与白人大学生相比,PEA 对黑人大学生 GPA 的提高作用较小。美国应系统性地降低少数种族和少数民族家庭向上社会流动的额外成本。
{"title":"Parental Educational Attainment and Academic Performance of American College Students; Blacks' Diminished Returns.","authors":"Shervin Assari","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As suggested by the Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDR) theory, socioeconomic status (SES) systemically results in smaller outcomes for non-Whites compared to Whites. We still know very little about diminished trans-generational returns of SES resources such as parental educational attainment (PEA).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This cross-sectional study explored racial variation in the effect of PEA on the college students' grade point average (GPA) in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Healthy Mind Study (HMS, 2016-2017) is a national telephone of college students in the US. The total sample was 18,072 domestic undergraduate college students who were either non-Hispanic Whites (<i>n</i> = 16,718; %92.50) or non-Hispanic Blacks (<i>n</i> = 1,354; %7.50). The independent variable was PEA. The main outcome was GPA measured using self-reported data. Age, gender, sexual orientation, transgender status, and financial difficulty were covariates. Race/ethnicity was the effect modifier. Linear regression models were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, higher PEA was associated with a higher GPA, independent of all possible confounders. Race/ethnicity, however, showed a significant interaction with PEA on students' GPA, indicating a smaller positive effect of PEA on non-Hispanic Blacks compared to non-Hispanic Whites college students' GPA. Race/ethnicity stratified models also showed a larger effect for White than Black students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The boosting effect of PEA in GPA is smaller for Black compared to White college students. US should systematically reduce extra costs of upward social mobility for racial and ethnic minority families.</p>","PeriodicalId":73766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health economics and development","volume":"1 1","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6673665/pdf/nihms-1040099.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9344034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diminished Returns of Income Against Cigarette Smoking Among Chinese Americans. 美籍华人吸烟导致收入减少。
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-01
Shervin Assari

Introduction: Although educational attainment and income are protective against tobacco use, Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs) theory posits that the protective effects of socioeconomic status (SES) indicators may be smaller for marginalized groups than mainstream social groups. We aimed to compare the effects of educational attainment and income on current smoking status of Chinese American and European American adults.

Methods: Data came from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS - 2015). A total number of 28081 individuals entered our analysis. This included 420 Chinese Americans and 27661 European Americans. The independent variables were educational attainment (years of schooling) and annual income. The dependent variable was current established smoking status. Age, gender, region, and marital status were covariates. Ethnicity (Chinese American vs. European American) was the moderator.

Results: Overall, educational attainment and income were inversely associated with the odds of current established smoking. Ethnicity showed a significant interaction with income but not educational attainment. This finding suggested that the protective effect of income, but not educational attainment, on odds of current established smoking might be smaller for Chinese Americans than European Americans.

Conclusions: While educational attainment reduces the odds of current established smoking, high-income Chinese Americans remain at high risk of smoking due to a phenomenon called MDRs. In fact, high income is associated with greater smoking prevalence in Chinese Americans, rather than less. To reduce ethnic disparities in tobacco use, we need to go beyond SES inequalities by addressing structural causes of higher than expected risk of smoking in high SES ethnic minorities.

导言:虽然受教育程度和收入对烟草使用具有保护作用,但边缘化相关收益递减理论认为,社会经济地位指标对边缘化群体的保护作用可能小于主流社会群体。我们的目的是比较教育程度和收入对华裔美国人和欧裔美国成年人当前吸烟状况的影响。方法:数据来自全国健康访谈调查(NHIS - 2015)。共有28081人进入了我们的分析。其中包括420名华裔美国人和27661名欧洲裔美国人。自变量为受教育程度(受教育年限)和年收入。因变量为当前吸烟状况。协变量为年龄、性别、地区和婚姻状况。种族(华裔美国人vs.欧裔美国人)是调节因素。结果:总体而言,受教育程度和收入与当前吸烟的几率呈负相关。种族与收入有显著的相互作用,但与受教育程度无关。这一发现表明,收入(而非教育程度)对华裔美国人目前吸烟几率的保护作用可能小于欧洲裔美国人。结论:虽然受教育程度降低了当前吸烟的几率,但由于一种称为mdr的现象,高收入的华裔美国人仍然处于高风险中。事实上,在华裔美国人中,高收入与更高的吸烟率相关,而不是更低。为了减少烟草使用方面的种族差异,我们需要超越经济地位不平等,解决经济地位高的少数民族吸烟风险高于预期的结构性原因。
{"title":"Diminished Returns of Income Against Cigarette Smoking Among Chinese Americans.","authors":"Shervin Assari","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although educational attainment and income are protective against tobacco use, Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs) theory posits that the protective effects of socioeconomic status (SES) indicators may be smaller for marginalized groups than mainstream social groups. We aimed to compare the effects of educational attainment and income on current smoking status of Chinese American and European American adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS - 2015). A total number of 28081 individuals entered our analysis. This included 420 Chinese Americans and 27661 European Americans. The independent variables were educational attainment (years of schooling) and annual income. The dependent variable was current established smoking status. Age, gender, region, and marital status were covariates. Ethnicity (Chinese American vs. European American) was the moderator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, educational attainment and income were inversely associated with the odds of current established smoking. Ethnicity showed a significant interaction with income but not educational attainment. This finding suggested that the protective effect of income, but not educational attainment, on odds of current established smoking might be smaller for Chinese Americans than European Americans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While educational attainment reduces the odds of current established smoking, high-income Chinese Americans remain at high risk of smoking due to a phenomenon called MDRs. In fact, high income is associated with greater smoking prevalence in Chinese Americans, rather than less. To reduce ethnic disparities in tobacco use, we need to go beyond SES inequalities by addressing structural causes of higher than expected risk of smoking in high SES ethnic minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health economics and development","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37757113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Race by Gender Differences in the Protective Effects of Education and Income Against Subsequent Changes in Self-rated Health, Physical Activity, and Body Mass Index Among Older Americans. 教育和收入对美国老年人自评健康、体育活动和体重指数随后变化的保护作用的种族性别差异
Shervin Assari, Sharon Cobb, Mohsen Bazargan

Background: Educational attainment and income are central to maintenance of body mass index (BMI), physical activity, and self-rated health (SRH). However, less is known about how social groups differ in the role of educational attainment and income on subsequent changes in these health outcomes. This study compared race/ethnicity by gender groups of older Americans for the effects of baseline educational attainment and income on subsequent changes in BMI, physical activity, and SRH.

Methods: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) followed 37,495 male and female White and African American people above age 50 for 6 years from 2004 to 2010. This number included 15,581 White women, 12,495 White men, 5,580 African American women, and 3,839 African American men. Physical activity, BMI, and SRH were measured every two years. Multi-group structural equation modeling (latent growth curve modeling) was used to compare race/ethnicity by gender groups for the protective effects of educational attainment and income in 2004 on a decline in physical activity, BMI, and SRH from 2004 to 2010.

Results: Major race/ethnicity by gender differences were observed in the effects of baseline educational attainment and income on changes in BMI, physical activity, and SRH. Educational attainment and income showed more salient roles for White men and women than African American men and women. To give some examples, baseline education (years) was associated with changes in physical activity of White women and changes in BMI of White men, while baseline income was associated with changes in SRH of White Women. We did not find evidence suggesting that baseline income fully mediates the effect of baseline educational attainment on health outcomes, as in many instances, educational attainment but not income was associated with health changes over time.

Conclusion: The intersection of race/ethnicity and gender alters how educational attainment and income protects against subsequent changes in physical activity, BMI, and SRH. Social groups may vary in operant mechanisms by which social determinants of health prevent health decline in the United States.

背景:受教育程度和收入是维持身体质量指数(BMI)、身体活动和自评健康(SRH)的核心。然而,对于不同社会群体在受教育程度和收入对这些健康结果的后续变化所起的作用的差异,人们所知甚少。本研究比较了不同性别的美国老年人的种族/民族对基线受教育程度和收入对随后BMI、身体活动和SRH变化的影响。方法:2004 ~ 2010年,美国健康与退休研究(HRS)对37495名50岁以上的白人和非裔美国人进行了为期6年的随访。其中白人女性15581人,白人男性12495人,非裔美国女性5580人,非裔美国男性3839人。每两年测量一次身体活动、BMI和SRH。采用多组结构方程模型(潜在增长曲线模型)比较了2004年受教育程度和收入对2004年至2010年身体活动、BMI和SRH下降的保护作用。结果:在基线受教育程度和收入对BMI、体力活动和SRH变化的影响中,观察到主要的种族/民族性别差异。受教育程度和收入对白人男性和女性的影响比非洲裔男性和女性更为显著。举几个例子,基线教育(年数)与白人女性的体力活动变化和白人男性的BMI变化有关,而基线收入与白人女性的SRH变化有关。我们没有发现证据表明基线收入完全调节基线受教育程度对健康结果的影响,因为在许多情况下,受教育程度而不是收入与健康变化有关。结论:种族/民族和性别的交集改变了受教育程度和收入如何保护身体活动、BMI和SRH的后续变化。在美国,健康的社会决定因素预防健康下降的运作机制可能各不相同。
{"title":"Race by Gender Differences in the Protective Effects of Education and Income Against Subsequent Changes in Self-rated Health, Physical Activity, and Body Mass Index Among Older Americans.","authors":"Shervin Assari,&nbsp;Sharon Cobb,&nbsp;Mohsen Bazargan","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational attainment and income are central to maintenance of body mass index (BMI), physical activity, and self-rated health (SRH). However, less is known about how social groups differ in the role of educational attainment and income on subsequent changes in these health outcomes. This study compared race/ethnicity by gender groups of older Americans for the effects of baseline educational attainment and income on subsequent changes in BMI, physical activity, and SRH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) followed 37,495 male and female White and African American people above age 50 for 6 years from 2004 to 2010. This number included 15,581 White women, 12,495 White men, 5,580 African American women, and 3,839 African American men. Physical activity, BMI, and SRH were measured every two years. Multi-group structural equation modeling (latent growth curve modeling) was used to compare race/ethnicity by gender groups for the protective effects of educational attainment and income in 2004 on a decline in physical activity, BMI, and SRH from 2004 to 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major race/ethnicity by gender differences were observed in the effects of baseline educational attainment and income on changes in BMI, physical activity, and SRH. Educational attainment and income showed more salient roles for White men and women than African American men and women. To give some examples, baseline education (years) was associated with changes in physical activity of White women and changes in BMI of White men, while baseline income was associated with changes in SRH of White Women. We did not find evidence suggesting that baseline income fully mediates the effect of baseline educational attainment on health outcomes, as in many instances, educational attainment but not income was associated with health changes over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intersection of race/ethnicity and gender alters how educational attainment and income protects against subsequent changes in physical activity, BMI, and SRH. Social groups may vary in operant mechanisms by which social determinants of health prevent health decline in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":73766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health economics and development","volume":"1 2","pages":"9-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10076541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of health economics and development
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1