Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1007/s11841-022-00933-0
King-Ho Leung
Recent philosophy has witnessed a renewed interest in the works and ideas of Henri Bergson (1859-1941). But while contemporary scholarship has sought to rehabilitate Bergson's insights on time, memory, consciousness, and human freedom, comparatively little attention has been paid to Bergson's relationship to pantheism. By revisiting the 'pantheism' controversy surrounding Bergsonian philosophy during Bergson's lifetime, this article argues that the panentheistic notion of 'being-in-God' can serve as an illuminating framework for the interpretation of Bergson's philosophy. By examining the 'pantheist' readings of Bergson and comparing and contrasting Bergson's philosophy of life with Spinoza's panentheistic metaphysics, this paper shows that an account of 'being-in-Life' is key to Bergson's metaphysical outlook as well as his account of philosophy as a practice of 'intuitive' thinking. In so doing, this paper highlights some of the implicit religious motifs not only in Bergson's metaphysical outlook but also in his conception of the task of philosophy.
{"title":"Bergson, Pan(en)theism, and 'Being-in-Life'.","authors":"King-Ho Leung","doi":"10.1007/s11841-022-00933-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-022-00933-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent philosophy has witnessed a renewed interest in the works and ideas of Henri Bergson (1859-1941). But while contemporary scholarship has sought to rehabilitate Bergson's insights on time, memory, consciousness, and human freedom, comparatively little attention has been paid to Bergson's relationship to pantheism. By revisiting the 'pantheism' controversy surrounding Bergsonian philosophy during Bergson's lifetime, this article argues that the panentheistic notion of 'being-in-God' can serve as an illuminating framework for the interpretation of Bergson's philosophy. By examining the 'pantheist' readings of Bergson and comparing and contrasting Bergson's philosophy of life with Spinoza's panentheistic metaphysics, this paper shows that an account of 'being-in-Life' is key to Bergson's metaphysical outlook as well as his account of philosophy as a practice of 'intuitive' thinking. In so doing, this paper highlights some of the implicit religious motifs not only in Bergson's metaphysical outlook but also in his conception of the task of philosophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74845,"journal":{"name":"Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.)","volume":"62 2","pages":"293-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494488/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10227362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-07-28DOI: 10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z
Sanjit Chakraborty
This fictionalized script (fictional dialogue between Coronavirus and the Philosopher) traces the contours of the conversation that seeks to fathom the crisis unleashed by the outbreak and global spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19 pandemic) and the ensuing anxieties created in our current social living. The scenario of deepened isolation of the self from the other (social distancing and 'stay-at-home' or various lockdowns) is considered, and it is proposed (by the philosopher, I presume) that isolation, while an unavoidable requirement, does not mean it is some mental lassitude but rather may be seen as an enthusiastic concern toward recovering physical and mental wellbeing of the larger communities concerned to control the possible avenues of transmission of the contagion. The conversation meanders around the issue of quarantine, its attraction or otherwise, and who benefits from this restriction, its effects on one's mental constitution, etc. Philosophers have been known to isolate themselves in other contexts and situations (Yājñavalkya and the Buddha withdrawing to the forest; the Jain mendicants crossing "the ford"; the Stoics withdrawing from society, Nietzsche's retreating regularly to the sanatorium; Heidegger to the Black Forest; Kant's unsocial sociability and Wittgenstein living lonesome lives, etc.) give us a taste of what is to come in the dialogue to resist the calamity of the coronavirus and its grim effects that engulf the entire humanity.
{"title":"Spinning Solitude: Coronavirus and the Philosopher.","authors":"Sanjit Chakraborty","doi":"10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This fictionalized script (fictional dialogue between Coronavirus and the Philosopher) traces the contours of the conversation that seeks to fathom the crisis unleashed by the outbreak and global spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19 pandemic) and the ensuing anxieties created in our current social living. The scenario of deepened isolation of the self from the other (social distancing and 'stay-at-home' or various lockdowns) is considered, and it is proposed (by the philosopher, I presume) that isolation, while an unavoidable requirement, does not mean it is some mental lassitude but rather may be seen as an enthusiastic concern toward recovering physical and mental wellbeing of the larger communities concerned to control the possible avenues of transmission of the contagion. The conversation meanders around the issue of quarantine, its attraction or otherwise, and who benefits from this restriction, its effects on one's mental constitution, etc. Philosophers have been known to isolate themselves in other contexts and situations (Yājñavalkya and the Buddha withdrawing to the forest; the Jain mendicants crossing \"the ford\"; the Stoics withdrawing from society, Nietzsche's retreating regularly to the sanatorium; Heidegger to the Black Forest; Kant's unsocial sociability and Wittgenstein living lonesome lives, etc.) give us a taste of what is to come in the dialogue to resist the calamity of the coronavirus and its grim effects that engulf the entire humanity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74845,"journal":{"name":"Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.)","volume":"60 3","pages":"769-774"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316706/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号