首页 > 最新文献

National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report最新文献

英文 中文
Determinants of total family charges for health care: United States, 1980. 家庭保健总费用的决定因素:美国,1980年。
J H Sunshine, M Dicker

This report addresses a question of importance for policymakers: "What are the determinants of the total charges for health care that U.S. families face?" Policymakers' concerns about this question have two main grounds. First, U.S. health care costs are large and growing rapidly. They now exceed 11 percent of the gross national product, and the answer to the question can shed some light on their troubling growth. Second, total family charges for health care reflect the quantity of health care received by families, and it is important to know whether the determinants of total charges are principally the need for health care, or involve other factors less related to need. In this report, the determinants of total charges and their importance are identified principally through multiple regression analysis. Total charges are defined as the full amount charged for all types of health care for all family members regardless of whether these amounts are paid out of pocket, paid by insurance (or public health care coverage programs), or go unpaid. The data used are from the family data files of the 1980 National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES). This report presents data on the approximately 5,000 multiple-person families interviewed in this year-long longitudinal survey. The report provides a separate analysis for each of three socioeconomic family populations that have consistently been of interest to policymakers. These are (1) older families (defined for this report as all U.S. multiple-person families with a member 65 years of age or over); (2) younger, lower income families (all U.S. multiple-person families below 200 percent of the poverty level in 1980 and with all members under 65 years of age); and (3) younger, better off families (all U.S. multiple-person families at 200 percent of the poverty level or higher in 1980 and with all members under 65). Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the effect on total family charges of family demographic and sociocultural characteristics, family illnesses, special health events (such as births, deaths, and hospitalizations of family members), general family health status, family income, family health insurance characteristics, and family geographic and urbanization characteristics. Regressions were run separately for each of the three socio-economic family populations, with total family charges as the dependent variable and approximately 45 variables measuring these family characteristics as independent variables. Because of the large number of independent variables involved, a multiple-step regression process (described in appendix I) was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

这份报告提出了一个对政策制定者很重要的问题:“美国家庭面临的医疗保健总费用的决定因素是什么?”政策制定者对这个问题的担忧有两个主要理由。首先,美国的医疗费用庞大且增长迅速。现在,它们已经超过了国民生产总值(gdp)的11%,这个问题的答案可以让我们对它们令人不安的增长有所了解。第二,家庭保健总费用反映了家庭获得保健的数量,重要的是要知道总费用的决定因素是否主要是保健需求,还是涉及与需求关系较小的其他因素。在本报告中,主要通过多元回归分析确定总费用的决定因素及其重要性。总费用定义为为所有家庭成员支付的所有类型医疗保健的全部费用,无论这些费用是自付,保险(或公共医疗保险计划)支付,还是未支付。使用的数据来自1980年全国医疗保健利用和支出调查(NMCUES)的家庭数据文件。这份报告提供了在长达一年的纵向调查中采访的大约5000个多口之家的数据。该报告对政策制定者一直感兴趣的三个社会经济家庭人口分别进行了分析。这些是:(1)老年家庭(在本报告中定义为所有成员年龄在65岁或以上的美国多人家庭);(2)较年轻、收入较低的家庭(所有美国多人家庭,1980年贫困水平低于200%,所有成员年龄都在65岁以下);(3)更年轻、更富裕的家庭(1980年所有美国多口人家庭处于贫困线的200%或更高水平,所有成员都在65岁以下)。采用多元回归分析,探讨家庭人口统计学和社会文化特征、家庭疾病、特殊健康事件(如家庭成员的出生、死亡和住院)、家庭一般健康状况、家庭收入、家庭健康保险特征以及家庭地理和城市化特征对家庭总收费的影响。分别对三个社会经济家庭人口进行回归分析,以家庭总费用为因变量,约45个衡量这些家庭特征的变量为自变量。由于涉及大量自变量,因此采用了多步回归过程(见附录1)。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Determinants of total family charges for health care: United States, 1980.","authors":"J H Sunshine,&nbsp;M Dicker","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report addresses a question of importance for policymakers: \"What are the determinants of the total charges for health care that U.S. families face?\" Policymakers' concerns about this question have two main grounds. First, U.S. health care costs are large and growing rapidly. They now exceed 11 percent of the gross national product, and the answer to the question can shed some light on their troubling growth. Second, total family charges for health care reflect the quantity of health care received by families, and it is important to know whether the determinants of total charges are principally the need for health care, or involve other factors less related to need. In this report, the determinants of total charges and their importance are identified principally through multiple regression analysis. Total charges are defined as the full amount charged for all types of health care for all family members regardless of whether these amounts are paid out of pocket, paid by insurance (or public health care coverage programs), or go unpaid. The data used are from the family data files of the 1980 National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES). This report presents data on the approximately 5,000 multiple-person families interviewed in this year-long longitudinal survey. The report provides a separate analysis for each of three socioeconomic family populations that have consistently been of interest to policymakers. These are (1) older families (defined for this report as all U.S. multiple-person families with a member 65 years of age or over); (2) younger, lower income families (all U.S. multiple-person families below 200 percent of the poverty level in 1980 and with all members under 65 years of age); and (3) younger, better off families (all U.S. multiple-person families at 200 percent of the poverty level or higher in 1980 and with all members under 65). Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the effect on total family charges of family demographic and sociocultural characteristics, family illnesses, special health events (such as births, deaths, and hospitalizations of family members), general family health status, family income, family health insurance characteristics, and family geographic and urbanization characteristics. Regressions were run separately for each of the three socio-economic family populations, with total family charges as the dependent variable and approximately 45 variables measuring these family characteristics as independent variables. Because of the large number of independent variables involved, a multiple-step regression process (described in appendix I) was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20986694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health care utilization and costs of adult cardiovascular conditions United States, 1980. 美国成人心血管疾病的保健利用和费用,1980年。
W R Harlan, P E Parsons, J W Thomas, H A Murt, J M Lepkowski, K E Guire, S E Berki, J R Landis

Cardiovascular conditions have a major economic as well as health impact on adults in the United States. In the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey, conducted during 1980, health service data were obtained from a national sample of 17,123 civilian noninstitutionalized individuals. These data have been analyzed to define the impact and demographic patterns of health care utilization and costs attributable to adult cardiovascular conditions. Approximately 28 million persons in the United States, or 17.3 percent of the total civilian noninstitutionalized population 17 years of age and over, had a cardiovascular condition during 1980. Cardiovascular conditions were reported with increasing frequency in successively older age groups and were reported most frequently by black persons. The prevalence and economic impact differed by specific type of cardiovascular condition and whether the condition was complicated by another disease. To examine these differences, persons reporting cardiovascular conditions were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups: persons with hypertension alone, persons with arteriosclerotic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated with hypertension, persons with arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease alone, and persons with cardiovascular disease associated with other conditions that might alter medical care utilization and disability. The disability, service utilization, and health care charges were compared among these groups, and data for each group were compared with those for the overall U.S. population. Survey participants were asked to rate their health relative to that of other people their age. The self-rating of persons reporting hypertension alone was lower than the national average. Only 17 percent of the general population rated their health as "fair" or "poor," but 27 percent of persons with hypertension alone used these descriptions. Overall, persons with hypertension alone were much less likely to be employed than the general population (52.2 percent versus 71.6 percent). However, when controlling for age, it was found that persons with hypertension alone were about as likely to be employed as the general population. On the average, persons with hypertension reported only slightly more work-loss days than did the general population (6.5 versus 4.9 days). A modest restriction of activity was reported by those with hypertension alone (20.1 days per year on the average compared with 15.6 for the general population). The mean number of ambulatory visits per year for those with hypertension alone was 7.9, only slightly greater than the 5.7 average for the overall population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

心血管疾病对美国成年人的经济和健康都有重大影响。在1980年进行的全国医疗保健利用和支出调查中,卫生服务数据来自全国17,123名未住院的平民个人样本。对这些数据进行了分析,以确定成人心血管疾病对医疗保健利用和成本的影响和人口模式。1980年,美国约有2800万人患有心血管疾病,占17岁及以上非住院人口总数的17.3%。心血管疾病在年龄较大的人群中报告的频率越来越高,黑人报告的频率最高。患病率和经济影响因心血管疾病的具体类型和疾病是否合并其他疾病而异。为了检验这些差异,报告心血管疾病的人被分为四个相互排斥的组:单独患有高血压的人、伴有高血压的动脉硬化性心脑血管疾病的人、单独患有动脉硬化性心血管疾病的人、伴有可能改变医疗保健利用和残疾的其他疾病的心血管疾病的人。将这些群体的残疾、服务利用和医疗保健费用进行比较,并将每个群体的数据与美国总人口的数据进行比较。调查参与者被要求对自己的健康状况与同龄人的健康状况进行比较。单独报告高血压的人的自我评价低于全国平均水平。只有17%的普通人群将自己的健康状况评为“一般”或“差”,但只有27%的高血压患者使用了这些描述。总体而言,单独患有高血压的人比一般人群就业的可能性要低得多(52.2%对71.6%)。然而,当控制年龄时,发现高血压患者与一般人群一样有可能被雇用。平均而言,高血压患者报告的失业天数仅略多于一般人群(6.5天对4.9天)。仅高血压患者报告了适度的活动限制(平均每年20.1天,而一般人群为15.6天)。高血压患者每年的平均门诊次数为7.9次,仅略高于总体人口的平均5.7次。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Health care utilization and costs of adult cardiovascular conditions United States, 1980.","authors":"W R Harlan,&nbsp;P E Parsons,&nbsp;J W Thomas,&nbsp;H A Murt,&nbsp;J M Lepkowski,&nbsp;K E Guire,&nbsp;S E Berki,&nbsp;J R Landis","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular conditions have a major economic as well as health impact on adults in the United States. In the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey, conducted during 1980, health service data were obtained from a national sample of 17,123 civilian noninstitutionalized individuals. These data have been analyzed to define the impact and demographic patterns of health care utilization and costs attributable to adult cardiovascular conditions. Approximately 28 million persons in the United States, or 17.3 percent of the total civilian noninstitutionalized population 17 years of age and over, had a cardiovascular condition during 1980. Cardiovascular conditions were reported with increasing frequency in successively older age groups and were reported most frequently by black persons. The prevalence and economic impact differed by specific type of cardiovascular condition and whether the condition was complicated by another disease. To examine these differences, persons reporting cardiovascular conditions were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups: persons with hypertension alone, persons with arteriosclerotic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated with hypertension, persons with arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease alone, and persons with cardiovascular disease associated with other conditions that might alter medical care utilization and disability. The disability, service utilization, and health care charges were compared among these groups, and data for each group were compared with those for the overall U.S. population. Survey participants were asked to rate their health relative to that of other people their age. The self-rating of persons reporting hypertension alone was lower than the national average. Only 17 percent of the general population rated their health as \"fair\" or \"poor,\" but 27 percent of persons with hypertension alone used these descriptions. Overall, persons with hypertension alone were much less likely to be employed than the general population (52.2 percent versus 71.6 percent). However, when controlling for age, it was found that persons with hypertension alone were about as likely to be employed as the general population. On the average, persons with hypertension reported only slightly more work-loss days than did the general population (6.5 versus 4.9 days). A modest restriction of activity was reported by those with hypertension alone (20.1 days per year on the average compared with 15.6 for the general population). The mean number of ambulatory visits per year for those with hypertension alone was 7.9, only slightly greater than the 5.7 average for the overall population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21183131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determinants of financially burdensome family health expenses: United States, 1980. 家庭医疗费用负担沉重的决定因素:美国,1980年。
M Dicker, J H Sunshine

This report focuses on two questions of current interest to policymakers. First, "What percent of U.S. families experience financially burdensome health expenses?" and, second, "What are the determinants of financially burdensome health expenses among U.S. families?" The first question is addressed by examining how the distribution in the United States of families with financially burdensome health expenses is affected by six different possible measures of financial burden. The second question is addressed by using multiple regression techniques on one of the measures selected as a preferred measure. The data used are from the family data files of the 1980 National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES). This report presents data on approximately 5,000 multiple-person families interviewed in this longitudinal survey. It provides a separate analysis for each of three socioeconomic family populations that have consistently been of interest to policymakers. These are (1) older families (defined for this report as all U.S. multiple-person families with a member 65 years of age or over); (2) younger, lower-income families (defined as all U.S. multiple-person families below 200 percent of the poverty level in 1980 and with all members under 65 years of age); and (3) younger, better-off families (defined as all U.S. multiple-person families at 200 percent of the poverty level or higher in 1980 and with all members under 65 years of age). Two general conceptual approaches have been used in the literature to assess financially burdensome health expenses. The first approach measures financial burden by the size of a family's health bill in dollars. The second approach focuses on a family's ability to pay its health bill, and it measures financial burden as a ratio of health expenses to family income. There is no agreement on which of the two approaches is preferable and also no agreement on which of several operational measures in each category is the most appropriate. In order to shed light on this controversy, this report compares six potentially useful operational measures of financially burdensome health expenses. Three are dollar measures and three are ratio measures. The three dollar measures are (1) total charges for health care (irrespective of who pays the bill or whether or not the bill is paid), (2) out-of-pocket expenses for health care services (family-paid premiums for health insurance are not included), and (3) total out-of-pocket expenses for health (the previous measure plus out-of-pocket premiums).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

本报告主要关注政策制定者当前感兴趣的两个问题。第一,“百分之多少的美国家庭经历了经济负担沉重的医疗费用?”第二,“美国家庭经济负担沉重的医疗费用的决定因素是什么?”解决第一个问题的办法是研究美国医疗费用负担沉重的家庭的分布如何受到六种不同的可能的经济负担衡量标准的影响。第二个问题是通过对其中一个作为首选度量的度量使用多元回归技术来解决的。使用的数据来自1980年全国医疗保健利用和支出调查(NMCUES)的家庭数据文件。本报告提供了在这项纵向调查中采访的大约5000个多口家庭的数据。它为政策制定者一直感兴趣的三个社会经济家庭人口提供了单独的分析。这些是:(1)老年家庭(在本报告中定义为所有成员年龄在65岁或以上的美国多人家庭);(2)较年轻的低收入家庭(定义为1980年低于贫困线200%且所有成员年龄在65岁以下的美国多人家庭);(3)较年轻、较富裕的家庭(定义为1980年美国所有多口人家庭的贫困水平达到或高于贫困线的200%,且所有成员年龄都在65岁以下)。文献中使用了两种一般的概念方法来评估财务负担沉重的医疗费用。第一种方法是以美元计算的家庭医疗费用的大小来衡量经济负担。第二种方法侧重于家庭支付医疗费用的能力,并以医疗费用与家庭收入的比率来衡量经济负担。对于这两种办法中哪一种比较可取,也没有达成一致意见,对于每一类的几项业务措施中哪一项是最适当的,也没有达成一致意见。为了阐明这一争议,本报告比较了财政负担沉重的医疗费用的六种可能有用的业务措施。三个是美元度量,三个是比率度量。三美元措施是(1)医疗保健总费用(无论谁支付账单或是否支付账单),(2)医疗保健服务的自付费用(不包括家庭支付的健康保险保险费),以及(3)医疗保健的自付费用总额(前一措施加上自付保险费)。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Determinants of financially burdensome family health expenses: United States, 1980.","authors":"M Dicker,&nbsp;J H Sunshine","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report focuses on two questions of current interest to policymakers. First, \"What percent of U.S. families experience financially burdensome health expenses?\" and, second, \"What are the determinants of financially burdensome health expenses among U.S. families?\" The first question is addressed by examining how the distribution in the United States of families with financially burdensome health expenses is affected by six different possible measures of financial burden. The second question is addressed by using multiple regression techniques on one of the measures selected as a preferred measure. The data used are from the family data files of the 1980 National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES). This report presents data on approximately 5,000 multiple-person families interviewed in this longitudinal survey. It provides a separate analysis for each of three socioeconomic family populations that have consistently been of interest to policymakers. These are (1) older families (defined for this report as all U.S. multiple-person families with a member 65 years of age or over); (2) younger, lower-income families (defined as all U.S. multiple-person families below 200 percent of the poverty level in 1980 and with all members under 65 years of age); and (3) younger, better-off families (defined as all U.S. multiple-person families at 200 percent of the poverty level or higher in 1980 and with all members under 65 years of age). Two general conceptual approaches have been used in the literature to assess financially burdensome health expenses. The first approach measures financial burden by the size of a family's health bill in dollars. The second approach focuses on a family's ability to pay its health bill, and it measures financial burden as a ratio of health expenses to family income. There is no agreement on which of the two approaches is preferable and also no agreement on which of several operational measures in each category is the most appropriate. In order to shed light on this controversy, this report compares six potentially useful operational measures of financially burdensome health expenses. Three are dollar measures and three are ratio measures. The three dollar measures are (1) total charges for health care (irrespective of who pays the bill or whether or not the bill is paid), (2) out-of-pocket expenses for health care services (family-paid premiums for health insurance are not included), and (3) total out-of-pocket expenses for health (the previous measure plus out-of-pocket premiums).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21182623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence, utilization, and costs associated with acute respiratory conditions, United States, 1980. 急性呼吸道疾病的发病率、使用率和费用,美国,1980年。
W R Harlan, H A Murt, J W Thomas, J M Lepkowski, K E Guire, P E Parsons, S E Berki, J R Landis

Acute respiratory conditions are common causes of health disturbance in the general population. They are generally self-limiting, although occasionally recurrent, and seldom result in large health care costs for each episode of illness. The National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES), conducted during 1980, provided an opportunity to assess the effect of acute respiratory conditions on utilization of medical services and on functional capability as well as the cost of related medical care. Acute respiratory conditions were reported by survey respondents and separated into five subgroups: colds, influenza, nasopharyngitis, otitis media, and lower respiratory infections. Allergic conditions and chronic respiratory disorders (tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumoconioses) were excluded. The subgroupings of acute respiratory conditions appear to separate the disorders in a manner consistent with the epidemiologic characteristics of each condition. About one-half (50.4 percent) of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population had one or more acute respiratory conditions during 1980. The highest rates for upper respiratory conditions (colds, influenza, nasopharyngitis, and otitis media) were reported for those under 18 years of age, and rates were lower in successively older groups. Lower respiratory infection rates were higher in the youngest and oldest groups. Despite a high incidence in the general population, most symptomatic episodes of colds, influenza, and nasopharyngitis did not result in ambulatory care visits or hospital admissions. Otitis media and lower respiratory infections were more often associated with medical visits. Acute respiratory conditions were associated with lower disability levels than the average for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population during 1980 (5.9 restricted-activity days for acute respiratory conditions, compared with an overall average of 13.8 restricted-activity days). Persons with upper respiratory conditions (colds, influenza, otitis media, and nasopharyngitis) averaged 2.3 to 5.4 restricted-activity days, but persons with lower respiratory infections experienced an average of 8.2 restricted-activity days. Indirect costs attributed to acute respiratory conditions in 1980 were $7.7 billion for employed persons and $698 million for homemakers, for a total of $8.4 billion, about the same as total direct costs ($8.3 billion). These indirect costs were several times larger than the annual indirect costs estimated for either cardiovascular diseases or musculoskeletal diseases, two common chronic or recurrent condition groups. The high indirect costs reflect the high frequency of episodes in the general population during 1980 and the greater likelihood of associated bed-disability and work-loss days than for other conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

急性呼吸系统疾病是一般人群健康失调的常见原因。它们通常是自限性的,虽然偶尔会复发,而且很少导致每次发病的高额医疗费用。1980年进行的全国医疗保健利用和支出调查(NMCUES)提供了一个机会,评估急性呼吸道疾病对医疗服务利用和功能能力的影响以及相关医疗保健的费用。调查对象报告了急性呼吸道疾病,并将其分为五个亚组:感冒、流感、鼻咽炎、中耳炎和下呼吸道感染。排除了过敏性疾病和慢性呼吸系统疾病(肺结核、慢性阻塞性肺病和尘肺病)。急性呼吸系统疾病的亚组似乎以与每种疾病的流行病学特征相一致的方式将疾病分开。在1980年期间,大约一半(50.4%)的美国平民非机构人口患有一种或多种急性呼吸道疾病。据报道,上呼吸道疾病(感冒、流感、鼻咽炎和中耳炎)的发病率在18岁以下人群中最高,年龄越大的人群发病率越低。较低的呼吸道感染率在最年轻和最年长的组中较高。尽管在普通人群中发病率很高,但大多数感冒、流感和鼻咽炎的症状发作并不会导致门诊护理或住院。中耳炎和下呼吸道感染更常与就诊有关。1980年,急性呼吸系统疾病患者的残疾水平低于美国非机构居民的平均水平(急性呼吸系统疾病患者的限制活动天数为5.9天,而总体平均限制活动天数为13.8天)。上呼吸道疾病患者(感冒、流感、中耳炎和鼻咽炎)平均活动受限天数为2.3至5.4天,而下呼吸道感染患者平均活动受限天数为8.2天。1980年,由急性呼吸系统疾病引起的间接费用,受雇人士为77亿元,家庭主妇为6.98亿元,共84亿元,与直接费用总额(83亿元)大致相同。这些间接费用比心血管疾病或肌肉骨骼疾病(两种常见的慢性或复发性疾病)估计的年度间接费用高出数倍。高间接费用反映了1980年期间一般人群发病频率高,与其他情况相比,相关卧床残疾和失业天数的可能性更大。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Incidence, utilization, and costs associated with acute respiratory conditions, United States, 1980.","authors":"W R Harlan,&nbsp;H A Murt,&nbsp;J W Thomas,&nbsp;J M Lepkowski,&nbsp;K E Guire,&nbsp;P E Parsons,&nbsp;S E Berki,&nbsp;J R Landis","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute respiratory conditions are common causes of health disturbance in the general population. They are generally self-limiting, although occasionally recurrent, and seldom result in large health care costs for each episode of illness. The National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES), conducted during 1980, provided an opportunity to assess the effect of acute respiratory conditions on utilization of medical services and on functional capability as well as the cost of related medical care. Acute respiratory conditions were reported by survey respondents and separated into five subgroups: colds, influenza, nasopharyngitis, otitis media, and lower respiratory infections. Allergic conditions and chronic respiratory disorders (tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumoconioses) were excluded. The subgroupings of acute respiratory conditions appear to separate the disorders in a manner consistent with the epidemiologic characteristics of each condition. About one-half (50.4 percent) of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population had one or more acute respiratory conditions during 1980. The highest rates for upper respiratory conditions (colds, influenza, nasopharyngitis, and otitis media) were reported for those under 18 years of age, and rates were lower in successively older groups. Lower respiratory infection rates were higher in the youngest and oldest groups. Despite a high incidence in the general population, most symptomatic episodes of colds, influenza, and nasopharyngitis did not result in ambulatory care visits or hospital admissions. Otitis media and lower respiratory infections were more often associated with medical visits. Acute respiratory conditions were associated with lower disability levels than the average for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population during 1980 (5.9 restricted-activity days for acute respiratory conditions, compared with an overall average of 13.8 restricted-activity days). Persons with upper respiratory conditions (colds, influenza, otitis media, and nasopharyngitis) averaged 2.3 to 5.4 restricted-activity days, but persons with lower respiratory infections experienced an average of 8.2 restricted-activity days. Indirect costs attributed to acute respiratory conditions in 1980 were $7.7 billion for employed persons and $698 million for homemakers, for a total of $8.4 billion, about the same as total direct costs ($8.3 billion). These indirect costs were several times larger than the annual indirect costs estimated for either cardiovascular diseases or musculoskeletal diseases, two common chronic or recurrent condition groups. The high indirect costs reflect the high frequency of episodes in the general population during 1980 and the greater likelihood of associated bed-disability and work-loss days than for other conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21182987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disability, utilization, and costs associated with musculoskeletal conditions. 与肌肉骨骼疾病相关的残疾、利用和费用。
H Murt, P E Parsons, W R Harlan, J W Thomas, J M Lepkowski, K E Guire, S Berki, J R Landis

In this report, data from the 1980 National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey are used to present health characteristics, types and quantities of services used, and the charges for these services for persons with musculoskeletal diseases. Slightly more than 44 million people, or 19.8 percent of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, were reported in the survey to have at least one musculoskeletal disorder. These data are generally consistent with those from other health surveys, which show that the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders increases for successive age categories, that such disorders are more common among women than among men, and that they are less prevalent among black persons than among persons of other races. In terms of both functional limitation and perceived health status, persons with musculoskeletal conditions are, with some notable exceptions, in relatively poor health. Persons having back problems in addition to problems with peripheral joints (such as the knee, hip, or shoulder) were more likely to rate their health as "fair" or "poor" compared with persons having only back problems or compared with persons in the civilian noninstitutionalized population as a whole. Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for a considerable proportion of all disability days reported by the total civilian noninstitutionalized population: 13 percent of restricted-activity days, 8.8 percent of bed-disability days, and 11.2 percent of all work-loss days were directly attributable to musculoskeletal conditions. The disabling effects of musculoskeletal problems pose a significant economic burden; they accounted for a total of $3.9 billion in lost productivity costs during 1980 for employed persons in the work force and for homemakers. For persons with musculoskeletal problems, the mean number of ambulatory visits per year was nearly twice the rate of 5.2 for the general civilian noninstitutionalized population. Of ambulatory visits made to all health care providers by persons with these conditions, 35.6 percent were related in some way to the treatment of their musculoskeletal problems. Musculoskeletal conditions are somewhat different from many other illnesses because their treatment is within the professional domain of several types of health care providers. Approximately 13 percent of persons with any type of musculoskeletal disorder received care from chiropractors during the year and this figure rose to nearly 30 percent for back problems only. However, nearly 33 percent of persons with musculoskeletal problems made no visits for treatment of their condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

在本报告中,采用了1980年全国医疗保健利用和支出调查的数据,介绍了肌肉骨骼疾病患者的健康特征、所使用服务的类型和数量,以及这些服务的收费。调查显示,超过4400万人或19.8%的美国非收容平民至少患有一种肌肉骨骼疾病。这些数据与其他健康调查的数据大体一致,这些调查表明,肌肉骨骼疾病的发病率在连续的年龄组中增加,这种疾病在妇女中比在男子中更常见,在黑人中比在其他种族中更少见。就功能限制和健康状况而言,患有肌肉骨骼疾病的人,除了一些明显的例外,健康状况相对较差。除了周围关节(如膝盖、臀部或肩部)的问题之外,还有背部问题的人与只有背部问题的人或与非机构人口中的平民整体相比,更有可能将自己的健康评为“一般”或“差”。肌肉骨骼疾病在所有非机构人口报告的残疾日中占相当大的比例:13%的限制活动日,8.8%的卧床残疾日和11.2%的所有失业日可直接归因于肌肉骨骼疾病。肌肉骨骼问题的致残效应造成了重大的经济负担;在1980年期间,对劳动力中的就业者和家庭主妇来说,这些损失的生产力成本共计39亿美元。对于有肌肉骨骼问题的人来说,平均每年的门诊次数几乎是普通平民非机构人口(5.2次)的两倍。在患有这些疾病的人向所有卫生保健提供者进行的门诊中,35.6%的人在某种程度上与他们的肌肉骨骼问题的治疗有关。肌肉骨骼疾病与许多其他疾病有些不同,因为它们的治疗是在几种类型的卫生保健提供者的专业领域内进行的。在这一年里,大约有13%患有任何类型的肌肉骨骼疾病的人接受了脊椎指压治疗师的治疗,而这一数字仅在背部问题上就上升到了近30%。然而,近33%患有肌肉骨骼问题的人没有去医院接受治疗。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Disability, utilization, and costs associated with musculoskeletal conditions.","authors":"H Murt,&nbsp;P E Parsons,&nbsp;W R Harlan,&nbsp;J W Thomas,&nbsp;J M Lepkowski,&nbsp;K E Guire,&nbsp;S Berki,&nbsp;J R Landis","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this report, data from the 1980 National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey are used to present health characteristics, types and quantities of services used, and the charges for these services for persons with musculoskeletal diseases. Slightly more than 44 million people, or 19.8 percent of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, were reported in the survey to have at least one musculoskeletal disorder. These data are generally consistent with those from other health surveys, which show that the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders increases for successive age categories, that such disorders are more common among women than among men, and that they are less prevalent among black persons than among persons of other races. In terms of both functional limitation and perceived health status, persons with musculoskeletal conditions are, with some notable exceptions, in relatively poor health. Persons having back problems in addition to problems with peripheral joints (such as the knee, hip, or shoulder) were more likely to rate their health as \"fair\" or \"poor\" compared with persons having only back problems or compared with persons in the civilian noninstitutionalized population as a whole. Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for a considerable proportion of all disability days reported by the total civilian noninstitutionalized population: 13 percent of restricted-activity days, 8.8 percent of bed-disability days, and 11.2 percent of all work-loss days were directly attributable to musculoskeletal conditions. The disabling effects of musculoskeletal problems pose a significant economic burden; they accounted for a total of $3.9 billion in lost productivity costs during 1980 for employed persons in the work force and for homemakers. For persons with musculoskeletal problems, the mean number of ambulatory visits per year was nearly twice the rate of 5.2 for the general civilian noninstitutionalized population. Of ambulatory visits made to all health care providers by persons with these conditions, 35.6 percent were related in some way to the treatment of their musculoskeletal problems. Musculoskeletal conditions are somewhat different from many other illnesses because their treatment is within the professional domain of several types of health care providers. Approximately 13 percent of persons with any type of musculoskeletal disorder received care from chiropractors during the year and this figure rose to nearly 30 percent for back problems only. However, nearly 33 percent of persons with musculoskeletal problems made no visits for treatment of their condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21167354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Costs of illness: United States, 1980. 疾病费用:美国,1980年。
P E Parsons, R Lichtenstein, S E Berki, H A Murt, J M Lepkowski, S A Stehouwer, J R Landis

The total costs of illness and injury in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population in 1980 amounted to $381.7 billion. The direct costs of illness and injury--resource expenditures for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of medical and dental conditions--were $153.9 billion, or 40.3 percent of total costs. Indirect costs--economic losses from morbidity and mortality--were $227.9 billion, or 59.7 percent of total costs. Of indirect costs, $104.9 billion resulted from productivity losses because of morbidity, and $123.0 billion represent the present value of lost productivity from premature mortality based on a net effective discount rate of 4 percent. These estimates, based on data from the 1980. National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES), differ from other estimates of the costs of illness and injury in 1980 (Gibson and Waldo, 1982; Rice, Hodgson, and Kopstein, 1985). The differences, which can be resolved, are attributable to two major factors: (1) NMCUES includes only the civilian noninstitutionalized population, but the other estimates include the institutionalized population and the military; and (2) NMCUES indirect cost estimates for the population unable to work include persons who were retired for health reasons in 1979 and 1980, disabled homemakers, and other persons who were disabled for the entire year 1980 but were not retired for health reasons in 1979, but the Rice et al. estimates do not include the last two categories in the population unable to work. The principal NMCUES findings on the total costs of illness in the civilian noninstitutionalized population reinforce the importance of considering distributional effects. Persons 65 years of age and over represent one-tenth of this population yet account for more than one-fourth of direct costs and more than their share of total costs, even though the institutionalized elderly are excluded. More than two-thirds of total costs for this age category are accounted for by direct costs. Direct costs also account for more than two-thirds of total costs for people under 17 years of age. However, this youngest age category, which constitutes over one-fourth of the civilian noninstitutionalized population, generates only 12.3 percent of direct costs. In contrast, indirect costs account for well more than 60 percent of total costs for the working-age population (17-64 years of age). Within the working-age population, per capita direct costs are highest among persons who are not full participants in the work force, many of whom are not working full time or at all because of injury or ill health.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1980年,美国非收容人口患病和受伤的总费用达3817亿美元。疾病和伤害的直接成本——用于医疗和牙科疾病的诊断、治疗和管理的资源支出——为1539亿美元,占总成本的40.3%。间接成本——由发病率和死亡率造成的经济损失——为2279亿美元,占总成本的59.7%。在间接成本中,1049亿美元是由于发病率造成的生产力损失,1230亿美元是根据4%的净有效贴现率计算的过早死亡造成的生产力损失的现值。这些估计是基于1980年代的数据。国家医疗保健利用和支出调查(NMCUES),不同于1980年对疾病和伤害成本的其他估计(Gibson和Waldo, 1982;Rice, Hodgson, and Kopstein, 1985)。这种差异可以解决,主要归因于两个因素:(1)nmcue仅包括非机构人口的平民,但其他估计包括机构人口和军人;(2) nmcue对无法工作人口的间接成本估计包括1979年和1980年因健康原因退休的人,残疾家庭主妇,以及1980年全年残疾但在1979年因健康原因未退休的其他人员,但Rice等人的估计不包括无法工作人口中的后两类。nmcue关于非收容平民人口疾病总成本的主要调查结果强化了考虑分配效应的重要性。65岁及65岁以上的人占这一人口的十分之一,但其直接费用占四分之一以上,超过其在总费用中的份额,即使不包括被收容的老年人。这一年龄组总费用的三分之二以上是直接费用。17岁以下人群的直接成本也占总成本的三分之二以上。然而,这个最年轻的年龄组占非收容平民人口的四分之一以上,只产生12.3%的直接费用。相比之下,间接成本占劳动年龄人口(17-64岁)总成本的60%以上。在工作年龄人口中,非完全参加劳动力的人均直接成本最高,其中许多人由于受伤或健康不佳而没有全职工作或根本没有工作。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Costs of illness: United States, 1980.","authors":"P E Parsons,&nbsp;R Lichtenstein,&nbsp;S E Berki,&nbsp;H A Murt,&nbsp;J M Lepkowski,&nbsp;S A Stehouwer,&nbsp;J R Landis","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The total costs of illness and injury in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population in 1980 amounted to $381.7 billion. The direct costs of illness and injury--resource expenditures for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of medical and dental conditions--were $153.9 billion, or 40.3 percent of total costs. Indirect costs--economic losses from morbidity and mortality--were $227.9 billion, or 59.7 percent of total costs. Of indirect costs, $104.9 billion resulted from productivity losses because of morbidity, and $123.0 billion represent the present value of lost productivity from premature mortality based on a net effective discount rate of 4 percent. These estimates, based on data from the 1980. National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES), differ from other estimates of the costs of illness and injury in 1980 (Gibson and Waldo, 1982; Rice, Hodgson, and Kopstein, 1985). The differences, which can be resolved, are attributable to two major factors: (1) NMCUES includes only the civilian noninstitutionalized population, but the other estimates include the institutionalized population and the military; and (2) NMCUES indirect cost estimates for the population unable to work include persons who were retired for health reasons in 1979 and 1980, disabled homemakers, and other persons who were disabled for the entire year 1980 but were not retired for health reasons in 1979, but the Rice et al. estimates do not include the last two categories in the population unable to work. The principal NMCUES findings on the total costs of illness in the civilian noninstitutionalized population reinforce the importance of considering distributional effects. Persons 65 years of age and over represent one-tenth of this population yet account for more than one-fourth of direct costs and more than their share of total costs, even though the institutionalized elderly are excluded. More than two-thirds of total costs for this age category are accounted for by direct costs. Direct costs also account for more than two-thirds of total costs for people under 17 years of age. However, this youngest age category, which constitutes over one-fourth of the civilian noninstitutionalized population, generates only 12.3 percent of direct costs. In contrast, indirect costs account for well more than 60 percent of total costs for the working-age population (17-64 years of age). Within the working-age population, per capita direct costs are highest among persons who are not full participants in the work force, many of whom are not working full time or at all because of injury or ill health.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21182624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High-volume and low-volume users of health services: United States, 1980. 保健服务的大量使用者和少量使用者:美国,1980年。
S E Berki, J N Lepkowski, L Wyszewianski, J R Landis, M L Magilavy, C G McLaughlin, H A Murt

Data from the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey of 1980 are used to examine the characteristics of high-volume users of health care services, contrasting them with low-volume users and those who used no services at all. The three major types of medical care services examined are hospital inpatient care, ambulatory visits, and prescribed medications. Low users were defined, respectively, as those who during the year had either one or two hospital days, one nondental visit to a physician or nonphysician, and one prescribed medicine acquisition. High users were those with, respectively, 17 or more hospital days, 20 or more visits, and 25 or more prescribed medicine acquisitions. A very small percent of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population and of those who used services at all during the year consume a large percent of services in each of the three service types. High users of inpatient hospital care constitute 1.7 percent of the civilian noninstitutionalized population and 15 percent of persons hospitalized during the year, yet they used 54.4 percent of all hospital days used by the reference population. High users of ambulatory services constitute 4.5 percent of the reference population and only 5.7 percent of all users of ambulatory services, yet they accounted for 32.3 percent of all ambulatory visits. For prescribed medications, only 3.7 percent of the civilian noninstitutionalized population are high users, comprising 5.9 percent of all users, but they account for 32.9 percent of all prescription acquisitions. At the other extreme, low users of ambulatory care visits represent 17 percent of the reference population, and 21 percent of all users of such care, but only 3.3 percent of all visits. High users share certain characteristics. They are more likely than low users to be older and poorer, to have poorer health status and more medical conditions, and are more likely to have functional limitations. Both univariate and multivariable analyses show that the most important distinguishing characteristics of high users of any of the three medical services are poor health status, severe functional limitations, and the presence of multiple medical conditions--most importantly cancer, cardiac disorders, musculoskeletal diseases, respiratory diseases, and injuries and poisonings. Almost all high-volume users of every category of service (88 percent for hospital days, 89 percent for ambulatory visits, and 94 percent for prescribed medications) had at least three different diagnostic conditions reported during the year.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1980年全国医疗保健利用和支出调查的数据用于检查大量医疗保健服务使用者的特征,并将其与少量使用者和根本不使用服务的人进行对比。调查的三种主要医疗服务类型是医院住院护理、门诊就诊和处方药。低使用者分别被定义为那些在一年中住院一天或两天,一次非牙科就诊的医生或非医生,以及一次处方药购买的人。高剂量使用者分别是那些住院17天或更多、就诊20天或更多、获得处方药25天或更多的人。在这一年中,美国非机构的平民人口和那些使用过服务的人中,极小比例的人在这三种服务类型中每一种都消费了很大比例的服务。住院治疗的高度使用者占非住院平民人口的1.7%,占本年度住院人数的15%,但他们使用了参考人口使用的全部住院天数的54.4%。流动服务的高度使用者占参考人口的4.5%,只占所有流动服务使用者的5.7%,但他们占所有流动访问量的32.3%。对于处方药,只有3.7%的非机构人口是高使用者,占所有使用者的5.9%,但他们占所有处方获取的32.9%。在另一个极端,低用户的流动护理访问代表参考人口的17%,21%的所有用户的这种护理,但只有3.3%的所有访问。高用户具有某些特征。与低剂量使用者相比,他们更有可能年龄更大、更贫穷、健康状况更差、医疗条件更多,而且更有可能出现功能限制。单变量和多变量分析都表明,三种医疗服务中任何一种的高使用者最重要的区别特征是健康状况不佳、严重的功能限制以及存在多种医疗条件————最重要的是癌症、心脏病、肌肉骨骼疾病、呼吸系统疾病以及受伤和中毒。本年度报告的几乎所有各类服务的大量使用者(住院日占88%,门诊就诊占89%,处方药占94%)至少有三种不同的诊断条件。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"High-volume and low-volume users of health services: United States, 1980.","authors":"S E Berki,&nbsp;J N Lepkowski,&nbsp;L Wyszewianski,&nbsp;J R Landis,&nbsp;M L Magilavy,&nbsp;C G McLaughlin,&nbsp;H A Murt","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data from the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey of 1980 are used to examine the characteristics of high-volume users of health care services, contrasting them with low-volume users and those who used no services at all. The three major types of medical care services examined are hospital inpatient care, ambulatory visits, and prescribed medications. Low users were defined, respectively, as those who during the year had either one or two hospital days, one nondental visit to a physician or nonphysician, and one prescribed medicine acquisition. High users were those with, respectively, 17 or more hospital days, 20 or more visits, and 25 or more prescribed medicine acquisitions. A very small percent of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population and of those who used services at all during the year consume a large percent of services in each of the three service types. High users of inpatient hospital care constitute 1.7 percent of the civilian noninstitutionalized population and 15 percent of persons hospitalized during the year, yet they used 54.4 percent of all hospital days used by the reference population. High users of ambulatory services constitute 4.5 percent of the reference population and only 5.7 percent of all users of ambulatory services, yet they accounted for 32.3 percent of all ambulatory visits. For prescribed medications, only 3.7 percent of the civilian noninstitutionalized population are high users, comprising 5.9 percent of all users, but they account for 32.9 percent of all prescription acquisitions. At the other extreme, low users of ambulatory care visits represent 17 percent of the reference population, and 21 percent of all users of such care, but only 3.3 percent of all visits. High users share certain characteristics. They are more likely than low users to be older and poorer, to have poorer health status and more medical conditions, and are more likely to have functional limitations. Both univariate and multivariable analyses show that the most important distinguishing characteristics of high users of any of the three medical services are poor health status, severe functional limitations, and the presence of multiple medical conditions--most importantly cancer, cardiac disorders, musculoskeletal diseases, respiratory diseases, and injuries and poisonings. Almost all high-volume users of every category of service (88 percent for hospital days, 89 percent for ambulatory visits, and 94 percent for prescribed medications) had at least three different diagnostic conditions reported during the year.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21181101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Insurance coverage and ambulatory medical care of low-income children: United States, 1980. 低收入儿童的保险范围和流动医疗:美国,1980年。
M L Rosenbach

In the household survey phase of the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey of 1980, a survey was conducted of 17,123 persons who constituted a representative sample of the civilian population in the United States not residing in institutions. Through repeated interviews the survey obtained information on the health conditions of these people, the health care services they received in 1980, the costs of these services, and the sources of payment for services. This report, one of a series of reports on the survey findings, provides a profile of low-income children: Their health insurance coverage, health service use, and expenditures for physician visits. Children under 18 years of age in families below 150 percent of the 1980 Federal poverty level are considered low income. However, children who were ineligible to participate in the survey for part of the year are excluded, such as those who were born, who died, or who were institutionalized in 1980. A physician visit is defined as a face-to-face contact with a physician or a nonphysician working under the supervision of a physician. In addition, visits to nurse practitioners and physician assistants who were reported as "independent providers" are included. Otherwise, visits to independent providers (primarily chiropractors and optometrists), mental health visits, visits by physicians to hospital inpatients, and telephone contacts are excluded. Of the 63.9 million children under 18 years of age in the United States in 1980, about one-fourth (16.8 million) lived in low-income families, according to estimates from the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey. Nearly one-half (46 percent) of the 16.8 million low-income children were covered by Medicaid for all or part of 1980: 31 percent were covered by Medicaid only for the full year, 3 percent were covered by Medicaid for part of 1980 and uninsured for the remainder of the year, and 12 percent were covered by both Medicaid and private insurance during the year. An additional 30 percent of the low-income children were privately insured for the full year, while 8 percent had private insurance coverage for part of the year and were uninsured otherwise. Sixteen percent of the children in low-income families, or 2.7 million children, were uninsured for all of 1980. When added to the 3 percent with part year Medicaid coverage and the 8 percent with private coverage part of the year, over one-fourth (28 percent) were uninsured for at least part of 1980.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

在1980年全国医疗保健利用和支出调查的住户调查阶段,对17 123人进行了调查,这些人构成了没有住在医疗机构的美国平民人口的代表性样本。通过反复访谈,调查获得了关于这些人的健康状况、他们在1980年获得的保健服务、这些服务的费用以及服务支付来源的信息。本报告是关于调查结果的一系列报告之一,提供了低收入儿童的概况:他们的健康保险覆盖范围、卫生服务使用情况和医生就诊支出。低于1980年联邦贫困线150%的家庭中18岁以下的儿童被视为低收入。但是,在一年中部分时间内没有资格参加调查的儿童被排除在外,例如1980年出生、死亡或被收容的儿童。医生访问被定义为与医生或在医生监督下工作的非医生面对面接触。此外,还包括对报告为“独立提供者”的执业护士和医师助理的访问。否则,不包括对独立提供者(主要是指压按摩师和验光师)的访问、精神健康访问、医生对住院病人的访问和电话联系。根据国家医疗保健利用和支出调查的估计,1980年美国18岁以下的儿童有6390万,其中约四分之一(1680万)生活在低收入家庭。在1680万低收入儿童中,近一半(46%)的儿童在1980年全年或部分时间享受医疗补助:31%的儿童仅在1980年全年享受医疗补助,3%的儿童在1980年部分时间享受医疗补助,在这一年剩下的时间里没有保险,12%的儿童在这一年中同时享受医疗补助和私人保险。另外30%的低收入家庭的孩子全年都有私人保险,而8%的孩子一年有部分时间的私人保险,除此之外没有保险。1980年全年,低收入家庭中16%的儿童,即270万儿童没有保险。加上3%的部分年度医疗补助保险和8%的部分年度私人保险,超过四分之一(28%)的人至少在1980年的一部分时间里没有保险。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"Insurance coverage and ambulatory medical care of low-income children: United States, 1980.","authors":"M L Rosenbach","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the household survey phase of the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey of 1980, a survey was conducted of 17,123 persons who constituted a representative sample of the civilian population in the United States not residing in institutions. Through repeated interviews the survey obtained information on the health conditions of these people, the health care services they received in 1980, the costs of these services, and the sources of payment for services. This report, one of a series of reports on the survey findings, provides a profile of low-income children: Their health insurance coverage, health service use, and expenditures for physician visits. Children under 18 years of age in families below 150 percent of the 1980 Federal poverty level are considered low income. However, children who were ineligible to participate in the survey for part of the year are excluded, such as those who were born, who died, or who were institutionalized in 1980. A physician visit is defined as a face-to-face contact with a physician or a nonphysician working under the supervision of a physician. In addition, visits to nurse practitioners and physician assistants who were reported as \"independent providers\" are included. Otherwise, visits to independent providers (primarily chiropractors and optometrists), mental health visits, visits by physicians to hospital inpatients, and telephone contacts are excluded. Of the 63.9 million children under 18 years of age in the United States in 1980, about one-fourth (16.8 million) lived in low-income families, according to estimates from the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey. Nearly one-half (46 percent) of the 16.8 million low-income children were covered by Medicaid for all or part of 1980: 31 percent were covered by Medicaid only for the full year, 3 percent were covered by Medicaid for part of 1980 and uninsured for the remainder of the year, and 12 percent were covered by both Medicaid and private insurance during the year. An additional 30 percent of the low-income children were privately insured for the full year, while 8 percent had private insurance coverage for part of the year and were uninsured otherwise. Sixteen percent of the children in low-income families, or 2.7 million children, were uninsured for all of 1980. When added to the 3 percent with part year Medicaid coverage and the 8 percent with private coverage part of the year, over one-fourth (28 percent) were uninsured for at least part of 1980.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79692,"journal":{"name":"National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1985-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21173653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (Series). Series C, Analytical report
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1