Maria Trent, Harold Lehmann, Arlene Butz, Carol Thompson, Qiang Qian, Kevin D Frick
Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate consumers' maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for follow-up PID services by physicians and community health nurses (CHNs), differences by consumer type (adolescents versus parents), and the differences in health-provider predicted WTP consumer estimates and actual consumer WTP estimates.
Methods: In this IRB-approved study, a contingent valuation method was used to collect WTP data regarding co-payments to physicians or nurses for clinical service delivery from the consumers of adolescent PID services (parents and adolescents) and health providers using a national convenience sample. Consumers were recruited from an academic pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic and five health department school-based health clinics in a large urban community with high (sexually transmitted infection) STI prevalence. Participants completed a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression analyses.
Results: Adolescents were willing to pay $36 more (95 % Cl : $27.9-44.3) for community health nursing care and parents were willing to pay $48 more dollars (95 % Cl : $40.3-$57.4) than physician's predicted. There were no significant differences in adolescent and parents WTP for physician or nursing services Consumers (adolescents & parents) WTP for physician PID services were on average $18.50 higher than CHN PID services (p = 0.01). Using physician estimates for WTP as the reference group, adolescents were willing to pay $56 more (95 % Cl : $48.6-$63.4) for physician care and parents were willing to pay $66 more (95 % Cl : $59.0-$72.8) than physician's predicted.
Conclusion: Adolescents and parents are willing to pay more for physician follow-up for PID, but they are open to CHN follow-up visits based on the mean WTP for CHN visits. Since WTP also reflects the value that individuals place on a service, our data demonstrate that providers consistently underestimate the value consumers place on clinical services for x adolescents with PID.
{"title":"Understanding consumer preferences for care of adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease.","authors":"Maria Trent, Harold Lehmann, Arlene Butz, Carol Thompson, Qiang Qian, Kevin D Frick","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to estimate consumers' maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for follow-up PID services by physicians and community health nurses (CHNs), differences by consumer type (adolescents versus parents), and the differences in health-provider predicted WTP consumer estimates and actual consumer WTP estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this IRB-approved study, a contingent valuation method was used to collect WTP data regarding co-payments to physicians or nurses for clinical service delivery from the consumers of adolescent PID services (parents and adolescents) and health providers using a national convenience sample. Consumers were recruited from an academic pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic and five health department school-based health clinics in a large urban community with high (sexually transmitted infection) STI prevalence. Participants completed a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents were willing to pay $36 more (95 % Cl : $27.9-44.3) for community health nursing care and parents were willing to pay $48 more dollars (95 % Cl : $40.3-$57.4) than physician's predicted. There were no significant differences in adolescent and parents WTP for physician or nursing services Consumers (adolescents & parents) WTP for physician PID services were on average $18.50 higher than CHN PID services (p = 0.01). Using physician estimates for WTP as the reference group, adolescents were willing to pay $56 more (95 % Cl : $48.6-$63.4) for physician care and parents were willing to pay $66 more (95 % Cl : $59.0-$72.8) than physician's predicted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents and parents are willing to pay more for physician follow-up for PID, but they are open to CHN follow-up visits based on the mean WTP for CHN visits. Since WTP also reflects the value that individuals place on a service, our data demonstrate that providers consistently underestimate the value consumers place on clinical services for x adolescents with PID.</p>","PeriodicalId":92692,"journal":{"name":"Medecine therapeutique medecine de la reproduction, gynecologie, endocrinologie","volume":"15 4","pages":"358-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530924/pdf/nihms-993879.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37275356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Trent, H. Lehmann, A. Butz, C. Thompson, Q. Qian, K. Frick
Objective The objective of this study is to estimate consumers' maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for follow-up PID services by physicians and community health nurses (CHNs), differences by consumer type (adolescents versus parents), and the differences in health-provider predicted WTP consumer estimates and actual consumer WTP estimates. Methods In this IRB-approved study, a contingent valuation method was used to collect WTP data regarding co-payments to physicians or nurses for clinical service delivery from the consumers of adolescent PID services (parents and adolescents) and health providers using a national convenience sample. Consumers were recruited from an academic pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic and five health department school-based health clinics in a large urban community with high (sexually transmitted infection) STI prevalence. Participants completed a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression analyses. Results Adolescents were willing to pay $36 more (95 % Cl : $27.9-44.3) for community health nursing care and parents were willing to pay $48 more dollars (95 % Cl : $40.3-$57.4) than physician's predicted. There were no significant differences in adolescent and parents WTP for physician or nursing services Consumers (adolescents & parents) WTP for physician PID services were on average $18.50 higher than CHN PID services (p = 0.01). Using physician estimates for WTP as the reference group, adolescents were willing to pay $56 more (95 % Cl : $48.6-$63.4) for physician care and parents were willing to pay $66 more (95 % Cl : $59.0-$72.8) than physician's predicted. Conclusion Adolescents and parents are willing to pay more for physician follow-up for PID, but they are open to CHN follow-up visits based on the mean WTP for CHN visits. Since WTP also reflects the value that individuals place on a service, our data demonstrate that providers consistently underestimate the value consumers place on clinical services for x adolescents with PID.
{"title":"Understanding consumer preferences for care of adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease.","authors":"M. Trent, H. Lehmann, A. Butz, C. Thompson, Q. Qian, K. Frick","doi":"10.1684/MTE.2013.0475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1684/MTE.2013.0475","url":null,"abstract":"Objective\u0000The objective of this study is to estimate consumers' maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) for follow-up PID services by physicians and community health nurses (CHNs), differences by consumer type (adolescents versus parents), and the differences in health-provider predicted WTP consumer estimates and actual consumer WTP estimates.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000In this IRB-approved study, a contingent valuation method was used to collect WTP data regarding co-payments to physicians or nurses for clinical service delivery from the consumers of adolescent PID services (parents and adolescents) and health providers using a national convenience sample. Consumers were recruited from an academic pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic and five health department school-based health clinics in a large urban community with high (sexually transmitted infection) STI prevalence. Participants completed a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression analyses.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Adolescents were willing to pay $36 more (95 % Cl : $27.9-44.3) for community health nursing care and parents were willing to pay $48 more dollars (95 % Cl : $40.3-$57.4) than physician's predicted. There were no significant differences in adolescent and parents WTP for physician or nursing services Consumers (adolescents & parents) WTP for physician PID services were on average $18.50 higher than CHN PID services (p = 0.01). Using physician estimates for WTP as the reference group, adolescents were willing to pay $56 more (95 % Cl : $48.6-$63.4) for physician care and parents were willing to pay $66 more (95 % Cl : $59.0-$72.8) than physician's predicted.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000Adolescents and parents are willing to pay more for physician follow-up for PID, but they are open to CHN follow-up visits based on the mean WTP for CHN visits. Since WTP also reflects the value that individuals place on a service, our data demonstrate that providers consistently underestimate the value consumers place on clinical services for x adolescents with PID.","PeriodicalId":92692,"journal":{"name":"Medecine therapeutique medecine de la reproduction, gynecologie, endocrinologie","volume":"29 1","pages":"358-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85258001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号