Magda Shaheen, Katrina M Schrode, Dulcie Kermah, Deyu Pan, Vishwajeet Puri, Ali Zarrinpar, David Elisha, Sonia Michael Najjar, Theodore C Friedman
Objective: Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are at risk for developing cirrhosis and hepatic cancer. Currently, the definitive gold-standard method of diagnosing NASH is a liver biopsy, an invasive and costly method. Our objective was to compare three non-invasive methods of identifying NASH by using data on 10,007 subjects from NHANES III (1988-1994) to determine the prevalence and variables associated with NASH, as defined by each non-invasive method.
Methods: We used ultrasound data to identify subjects with moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis, of whom we identified the NASH population using either the HAIR score, the NASH liver fat score, or the Gholam score, each of which had been validated with liver biopsy. We performed multinomial logistic regression to compare each NASH population to the normal population (those with no-to-mild hepatic steatosis).
Results: We identified 1136 (9.5%) subjects as having NASH by at least one method and 219 (1.8%) were identified by all 3 methods. Independent of the non-invasive method used, Mexican-Americans (MA) had the highest prevalence of NASH. All three methods identified significant risk factors for NASH (p<0.05), including: elevated waist-to-hip ratio, elevated levels of C-peptide, total cholesterol, or C-reactive protein (CRP).
Conclusion: We conclude that the combined non-invasive methods can help identify candidates with a high likelihood of being diagnosed with NASH. Health care providers can screen people with the combined non-invasive methods for the risk factors and identify candidates for interventions, including exercise and/or referral to biopsy.
{"title":"Prevalence and Predictors of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Using Multiple Non-Invasive Methods: Data from NHANES III.","authors":"Magda Shaheen, Katrina M Schrode, Dulcie Kermah, Deyu Pan, Vishwajeet Puri, Ali Zarrinpar, David Elisha, Sonia Michael Najjar, Theodore C Friedman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are at risk for developing cirrhosis and hepatic cancer. Currently, the definitive gold-standard method of diagnosing NASH is a liver biopsy, an invasive and costly method. Our objective was to compare three non-invasive methods of identifying NASH by using data on 10,007 subjects from NHANES III (1988-1994) to determine the prevalence and variables associated with NASH, as defined by each non-invasive method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used ultrasound data to identify subjects with moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis, of whom we identified the NASH population using either the HAIR score, the NASH liver fat score, or the Gholam score, each of which had been validated with liver biopsy. We performed multinomial logistic regression to compare each NASH population to the normal population (those with no-to-mild hepatic steatosis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1136 (9.5%) subjects as having NASH by at least one method and 219 (1.8%) were identified by all 3 methods. Independent of the non-invasive method used, Mexican-Americans (MA) had the highest prevalence of NASH. All three methods identified significant risk factors for NASH (p<0.05), including: elevated waist-to-hip ratio, elevated levels of C-peptide, total cholesterol, or C-reactive protein (CRP).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the combined non-invasive methods can help identify candidates with a high likelihood of being diagnosed with NASH. Health care providers can screen people with the combined non-invasive methods for the risk factors and identify candidates for interventions, including exercise and/or referral to biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544753/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41180766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shujing Li, Xicui Sun, Minjie Chen, Zhekang Ying, Yamin Wan, Liya Pi, Bin Ren, Qi Cao
Liver fibrosis is a serious, life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality that result from diverse causes. Liver biopsy, considered the "gold standard" to diagnose, grade, and stage liver fibrosis, has limitations in terms of invasiveness, cost, sampling variability, inter-observer variability, and the dynamic process of fibrosis. Compelling evidence has demonstrated that all stages of fibrosis are reversible if the injury is removed. There is a clear need for safe, effective, and reliable non-invasive assessment modalities to determine liver fibrosis in order to manage it precisely in personalized medicine. However, conventional imaging methods used to assess morphological and structural changes related to liver fibrosis, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are only useful in assessing advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis. Functional imaging techniques, including MR elastography (MRE), US elastography, and CT perfusion are useful for assessing moderate to advanced liver fibrosis. MRE is considered the most accurate noninvasive imaging technique, and US elastography is currently the most widely used noninvasive means. However, these modalities are less accurate in early-stage liver fibrosis and some factors affect the accuracy of these techniques. Molecular imaging is a target-specific imaging mechanism that has the potential to accurately diagnose early-stage liver fibrosis. We provide an overview of recent advances in molecular imaging for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis which will enable clinicians to monitor the progression of disease and potentially reverse liver fibrosis. We compare the promising technologies with conventional and functional imaging and assess the utility of molecular imaging in precision and personalized clinical medicine in the early stages of liver fibrosis.
肝纤维化是一种严重的危及生命的疾病,其发病率和死亡率很高,原因多种多样。肝活检被认为是诊断、分级和分期肝纤维化的 "金标准",但它在侵入性、成本、取样变异性、观察者之间的变异性以及纤维化的动态过程等方面存在局限性。令人信服的证据表明,如果消除损伤,所有阶段的肝纤维化都是可逆的。为了在个性化医疗中对肝纤维化进行精确管理,显然需要安全、有效、可靠的非侵入性评估方法来确定肝纤维化。然而,用于评估与肝纤维化相关的形态和结构变化的传统成像方法,包括超声波、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI),只能用于评估包括肝硬化在内的晚期肝病。功能成像技术,包括磁共振弹性成像(MRE)、超声弹性成像和 CT 灌注,则可用于评估中晚期肝纤维化。磁共振弹性成像被认为是最准确的无创成像技术,而 US 弹性成像是目前应用最广泛的无创方法。然而,这些方法对早期肝纤维化的准确性较低,而且有些因素会影响这些技术的准确性。分子成像是一种靶向特异性成像机制,有可能准确诊断早期肝纤维化。我们概述了用于肝纤维化诊断和分期的分子成像的最新进展,这将使临床医生能够监测疾病的进展,并有可能逆转肝纤维化。我们将有前景的技术与传统成像和功能成像进行了比较,并评估了分子成像在肝纤维化早期阶段的精准和个性化临床医学中的效用。
{"title":"Liver Fibrosis Conventional and Molecular Imaging Diagnosis Update.","authors":"Shujing Li, Xicui Sun, Minjie Chen, Zhekang Ying, Yamin Wan, Liya Pi, Bin Ren, Qi Cao","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver fibrosis is a serious, life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality that result from diverse causes. Liver biopsy, considered the \"gold standard\" to diagnose, grade, and stage liver fibrosis, has limitations in terms of invasiveness, cost, sampling variability, inter-observer variability, and the dynamic process of fibrosis. Compelling evidence has demonstrated that all stages of fibrosis are reversible if the injury is removed. There is a clear need for safe, effective, and reliable non-invasive assessment modalities to determine liver fibrosis in order to manage it precisely in personalized medicine. However, conventional imaging methods used to assess morphological and structural changes related to liver fibrosis, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are only useful in assessing advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis. Functional imaging techniques, including MR elastography (MRE), US elastography, and CT perfusion are useful for assessing moderate to advanced liver fibrosis. MRE is considered the most accurate noninvasive imaging technique, and US elastography is currently the most widely used noninvasive means. However, these modalities are less accurate in early-stage liver fibrosis and some factors affect the accuracy of these techniques. Molecular imaging is a target-specific imaging mechanism that has the potential to accurately diagnose early-stage liver fibrosis. We provide an overview of recent advances in molecular imaging for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis which will enable clinicians to monitor the progression of disease and potentially reverse liver fibrosis. We compare the promising technologies with conventional and functional imaging and assess the utility of molecular imaging in precision and personalized clinical medicine in the early stages of liver fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6653681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141285747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}