首页 > 最新文献

First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal最新文献

英文 中文
A First Nations-led community survey of early COVID-19 pandemic experiences in Victoria, Australia 在澳大利亚维多利亚州,原住民主导的一项关于COVID-19早期大流行经历的社区调查
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100060
Katarzyna Wojcik , Jane Goller , Joanne Luke , Lina Gubhaju , Richard Chenhall , Graham Gee , Ngaree Blow , Lisa Thorpe , Paul Stewart , Alister Thorpe

Purpose

During 2020, state and federal government-mandated restrictions and extended lockdowns were implemented in Australia because of the increasing presence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response to COVID-19 and restrictions, First Nations communities and organisations across Australia developed resources and strategies for support. The state of Victoria experienced the lengthiest lockdowns in Australia. This study aimed to describe the health and sociocultural experiences of First Nations peoples in the Australian state of Victoria during these restrictions.

Methods

The Measuring Indigenous Communities’ Response, Resilience and Recovery online survey was developed and implemented by an Indigenous leadership group. This cross-sectional study focused on First Nations communities’ experiences of the pandemic. Descriptive and thematic qualitative analyses were conducted to explore outcomes related to health and social experiences, and cultural and community connectedness.

Main findings

A total of 67 people responded between November 2020 and January 2021; 49 (73.1%) were female, with a median age of 47 years, and 54 (81.8%) resided in metropolitan Melbourne. Many respondents (47.5%) reported difficulty accessing general healthcare, mental health and education. First Nations organisations and family members were the primary source of additional support during 2020. Changes in health behaviours – such as alcohol consumption, tobacco use and physical activity – after restrictions were variable. For community connection, respondents reported decreases in seeing family and attending cultural events; however, they reported an increase in the use of technology to connect with community.

Principal conclusions

This study provides insights into the experiences of First Nations peoples in Victoria during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic response, and the types of support and resources accessed. The importance of community connectedness during the COVID-19 pandemic and First Nations-led responses to support community to promote better health outcomes was highlighted in this study.
2020年期间,由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的增加,澳大利亚实施了州和联邦政府规定的限制和延长的封锁。为了应对COVID-19和限制措施,澳大利亚各地的原住民社区和组织制定了支持资源和战略。维多利亚州经历了澳大利亚最长的封锁。本研究旨在描述澳大利亚维多利亚州第一民族在这些限制期间的健康和社会文化经历。方法测量土著社区的反应,弹性和恢复在线调查由土著领导小组开发和实施。这项横断面研究侧重于第一民族社区对大流行的经历。进行了描述性和专题定性分析,以探索与健康和社会经验以及文化和社区联系有关的结果。在2020年11月至2021年1月期间,共有67人回应;49人(73.1%)为女性,中位年龄为47岁,54人(81.8%)居住在墨尔本大都会区。许多答复者(47.5%)报告难以获得一般保健、心理健康和教育。原住民组织和家庭成员是2020年期间额外支持的主要来源。健康行为的变化——如饮酒、吸烟和体育活动——在限制之后是可变的。在社区联系方面,受访者表示见家人和参加文化活动的次数减少了;然而,他们报告说,使用技术与社区联系的情况有所增加。本研究深入了解了2020年COVID-19大流行应对期间维多利亚州第一民族的经历,以及获得的支持和资源类型。本研究强调了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间社区联系的重要性,以及原住民主导的支持社区促进更好健康结果的应对措施。
{"title":"A First Nations-led community survey of early COVID-19 pandemic experiences in Victoria, Australia","authors":"Katarzyna Wojcik ,&nbsp;Jane Goller ,&nbsp;Joanne Luke ,&nbsp;Lina Gubhaju ,&nbsp;Richard Chenhall ,&nbsp;Graham Gee ,&nbsp;Ngaree Blow ,&nbsp;Lisa Thorpe ,&nbsp;Paul Stewart ,&nbsp;Alister Thorpe","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100060","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100060","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>During 2020, state and federal government-mandated restrictions and extended lockdowns were implemented in Australia because of the increasing presence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response to COVID-19 and restrictions, First Nations communities and organisations across Australia developed resources and strategies for support. The state of Victoria experienced the lengthiest lockdowns in Australia. This study aimed to describe the health and sociocultural experiences of First Nations peoples in the Australian state of Victoria during these restrictions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Measuring Indigenous Communities’ Response, Resilience and Recovery online survey was developed and implemented by an Indigenous leadership group. This cross-sectional study focused on First Nations communities’ experiences of the pandemic. Descriptive and thematic qualitative analyses were conducted to explore outcomes related to health and social experiences, and cultural and community connectedness.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>A total of 67 people responded between November 2020 and January 2021; 49 (73.1%) were female, with a median age of 47 years, and 54 (81.8%) resided in metropolitan Melbourne. Many respondents (47.5%) reported difficulty accessing general healthcare, mental health and education. First Nations organisations and family members were the primary source of additional support during 2020. Changes in health behaviours – such as alcohol consumption, tobacco use and physical activity – after restrictions were variable. For community connection, respondents reported decreases in seeing family and attending cultural events; however, they reported an increase in the use of technology to connect with community.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>This study provides insights into the experiences of First Nations peoples in Victoria during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic response, and the types of support and resources accessed. The importance of community connectedness during the COVID-19 pandemic and First Nations-led responses to support community to promote better health outcomes was highlighted in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144471356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When reconciliation overshadows rights: The Métis’ continued fight for health data and recognition 当和解掩盖了权利:姆萨姆族继续争取健康数据和认可
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100068
Alexandra Nychuk (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Kiera Kowalski (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Chelsea Gabel (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) , Robert Henry (Métis - Métis Nation Saskatchewan)
In 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act received royal assent in Canada, further affirming inherent rights for Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis). Despite this and a constitutional recognition of Aboriginal rights in 1982, the Métis have yet to have their right to health recognised. The prioritisation of pan-Indigenous approaches to addressing inequities in Canada neglects to recognise the collective rights (exercised through a governing body, nation, tribal community, etc.) that diversifies Indigenous rights from other human rights. Métis critically need accurate health data that are conducted using distinctions-based approaches, as they remain stuck in data dependency. However, a considerable barrier to Métis data collection is that Indigenous health research funding in Canada predominantly favours pan-Indigenous approaches, rendering the Métis insignificant in their fight for health recognition.
2021年,《联合国土著人民权利宣言》法案在加拿大获得御准,进一步肯定了土著人民(第一民族、因纽特人和姆萨梅蒂斯人)的固有权利。尽管如此,而且1982年宪法承认土著居民的权利,但姆萨迪人的健康权尚未得到承认。在加拿大,将解决不平等问题的泛土著方法列为优先事项,忽视了承认使土著权利有别于其他人权的集体权利(通过理事机构、国家、部落社区等行使)。由于她们仍然陷于对数据的依赖,因此她们迫切需要使用基于区别的方法获得准确的健康数据。然而,收集msamims数据的一个相当大的障碍是,加拿大土著保健研究经费主要支持泛土著方法,使msamims在争取健康承认方面显得微不足道。
{"title":"When reconciliation overshadows rights: The Métis’ continued fight for health data and recognition","authors":"Alexandra Nychuk (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) ,&nbsp;Kiera Kowalski (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) ,&nbsp;Chelsea Gabel (Métis - Manitoba Métis Federation) ,&nbsp;Robert Henry (Métis - Métis Nation Saskatchewan)","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100068","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100068","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2021, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act received royal assent in Canada, further affirming inherent rights for Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis). Despite this and a constitutional recognition of Aboriginal rights in 1982, the Métis have yet to have their right to health recognised. The prioritisation of pan-Indigenous approaches to addressing inequities in Canada neglects to recognise the collective rights (exercised through a governing body, nation, tribal community, etc.) that diversifies Indigenous rights from other human rights. Métis critically need accurate health data that are conducted using distinctions-based approaches, as they remain stuck in data dependency. However, a considerable barrier to Métis data collection is that Indigenous health research funding in Canada predominantly favours pan-Indigenous approaches, rendering the Métis insignificant in their fight for health recognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144596008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Raising the voices of young people in remote Aboriginal communities in Australia to identify place-based support needs: The Bigiswun Kid Project 提高澳大利亚偏远土著社区年轻人的声音,以确定基于地方的支持需求:Bigiswun儿童项目
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100084
Lauren J. Rice , Emily Carter , Emma Bear , Mudge Bedford , Cheyenne Carter , Jadnah Davies , Nikkita Rice , Sue Thomas , Fergus Wells , Elizabeth J. Elliott

Purpose

Adolescence is a crucial developmental period that is distinct from childhood and adulthood. There is a global push for adolescent-specific services informed by young people; such services are crucial for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples because adolescents make up one-third of the population. The authors of this study worked with young people and their families to: identify the support that young people need to thrive in remote Aboriginal communities; report how young people and their parents would like this support to be delivered; and describe what was learned from piloting support during the research project.

Methods

Ninety-four (83%) of all young people born in 2002–03 (aged 16 to 19 years) who were living in the Fitzroy Valley at the time and 101 (89%) of their parents were interviewed. Using an Aboriginal participatory action approach, the authors worked with young people and local Aboriginal leaders to pilot some support.

Main findings

The seven most common supports that were requested were: opportunities to participate in cultural and on-Country activities, organised sports, community-based youth hubs/safe places, public transport, child development workshops, supported work programs, and supported tertiary education. Parents and young people wanted individual communities re-empowered to design and lead this support.

Principal conclusions

The learnings and recommendations described in this paper can be used by local services to enhance existing and develop new support that enables young people to successfully transition into adulthood. This approach could identify and pilot support needs in communities elsewhere.
青春期是不同于儿童期和成人期的关键发育时期。全球正在推动由年轻人提供的针对青少年的服务;这种服务对土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民至关重要,因为青少年占人口的三分之一。这项研究的作者与年轻人及其家人合作:确定年轻人在偏远的土著社区茁壮成长所需的支持;报告年轻人和他们的父母希望如何提供这种支持;并描述在研究项目中从试点支持中学到了什么。方法对当时居住在菲茨罗伊山谷的2002-03年出生的所有年轻人(16至19岁)中的94人(83%)及其父母中的101人(89%)进行了访谈。作者采用土著居民参与行动的方法,与年轻人和当地土著领导人合作,试点提供一些支持。被要求的七个最常见的支持是:参加文化和国家活动的机会、有组织的体育活动、社区青年中心/安全场所、公共交通、儿童发展讲习班、支持的工作计划和支持的高等教育。家长和年轻人希望各个社区重新获得设计和领导这种支持的权力。主要结论:本文所述的经验教训和建议可以被地方服务机构用来加强现有的支持和开发新的支持,使年轻人能够成功地过渡到成年。这种方法可以确定和试点其他社区的支助需求。
{"title":"Raising the voices of young people in remote Aboriginal communities in Australia to identify place-based support needs: The Bigiswun Kid Project","authors":"Lauren J. Rice ,&nbsp;Emily Carter ,&nbsp;Emma Bear ,&nbsp;Mudge Bedford ,&nbsp;Cheyenne Carter ,&nbsp;Jadnah Davies ,&nbsp;Nikkita Rice ,&nbsp;Sue Thomas ,&nbsp;Fergus Wells ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Elliott","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100084","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100084","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Adolescence is a crucial developmental period that is distinct from childhood and adulthood. There is a global push for adolescent-specific services informed by young people; such services are crucial for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples because adolescents make up one-third of the population. The authors of this study worked with young people and their families to: identify the support that young people need to thrive in remote Aboriginal communities; report how young people and their parents would like this support to be delivered; and describe what was learned from piloting support during the research project.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ninety-four (83%) of all young people born in 2002–03 (aged 16 to 19 years) who were living in the Fitzroy Valley at the time and 101 (89%) of their parents were interviewed. Using an Aboriginal participatory action approach, the authors worked with young people and local Aboriginal leaders to pilot some support.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The seven most common supports that were requested were: opportunities to participate in cultural and on-Country activities, organised sports, community-based youth hubs/safe places, public transport, child development workshops, supported work programs, and supported tertiary education. Parents and young people wanted individual communities re-empowered to design and lead this support.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The learnings and recommendations described in this paper can be used by local services to enhance existing and develop new support that enables young people to successfully transition into adulthood. This approach could identify and pilot support needs in communities elsewhere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145060330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring best practices that integrate environmental health and primary healthcare in Indigenous populations: A scoping review 探索将土著居民的环境卫生和初级保健结合起来的最佳做法:范围审查
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100071
Jayden Wells , Veronica Matthews , Amal Chakraborty

Purpose

Country and the environment are essential components of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing. Colonisation disrupted these essential connections, damaging important reciprocal beneficial relationships that kept Country and community well. As a result, Indigenous populations exhibit poorer health outcomes compared with non-Indigenous Australians, with the life expectancy of Indigenous Australians being 74 years compared with 84 years in the general population. It is reported that 20 to 30 per cent of Indigenous disease burden can be attributed to environmental factors; however, historically, there has been little coordination between the environmental and primary healthcare sectors in Australia. The National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) has called for increased collaboration between environmental initiatives and primary healthcare to address various health disparities present within Indigenous Australians. This scoping review aimed to identify and analyse best practices that integrate environmental health initiatives and primary healthcare within Indigenous populations.

Methods

Standard scoping review methodology was employed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR Joannah Briggs Institute guidelines. Databases that were searched included CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE and Embase, as well as grey literature, between 2004–24. Inclusion criteria focused on studies involving international Indigenous populations, environmental health factors and primary healthcare integration, with two primary reviewers and a third for resolving conflicts.

Main findings

A total of 32 papers, primarily from Australia, were included in the final review. Regarding environmental determinants, there was a strong focus on housing condition, water quality and Indigenous land management. Various integrated programs demonstrated significant health improvements, such as reduced prevalence of infectious disease, enhanced cardiovascular health and better mental health outcomes. The concept of Indigenous 'caring for Country' emerged as a central theme, demonstrating the benefits of a unified approach to healthcare.

Principal conclusions

These findings demonstrate the value of implementing connections between environmental and primary healthcare services in improving Indigenous health. Factors leading to program success included community participation, Indigenous leadership and targeted, place-based interventions. However, there is a general lack of published evidence that sustainably integrates both environmental health and primary care. The limited number of examples demonstrated positive health outcomes, indicating the need for more community-led and Country-centred initiatives within primary care.
国家和环境是土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民福祉的重要组成部分。殖民破坏了这些重要的联系,破坏了保持国家和社区良好的重要互惠关系。因此,与非土著澳大利亚人相比,土著人口的健康状况较差,土著澳大利亚人的预期寿命为74岁,而一般人口的预期寿命为84岁。据报告,20%至30%的土著疾病负担可归因于环境因素;然而,从历史上看,澳大利亚的环境和初级保健部门之间几乎没有协调。全国土著社区控制的卫生组织呼吁加强环境倡议与初级保健之间的合作,以解决澳大利亚土著居民体内存在的各种健康差距。这次范围审查的目的是确定和分析将环境卫生倡议与土著人口的初级保健结合起来的最佳做法。方法按照PRISMA-ScR乔安娜布里格斯研究所指南采用标准范围审查方法。检索的数据库包括2004-24年间的CINAHL、Scopus、MEDLINE和Embase,以及灰色文献。纳入标准侧重于涉及国际土著人口、环境健康因素和初级保健一体化的研究,有两名主要审查者,第三名审查者负责解决冲突。最终评审共收录了32篇论文,主要来自澳大利亚。关于环境决定因素,重点是住房条件、水质和土著土地管理。各种综合项目显示出显著的健康改善,如降低传染病的患病率、增强心血管健康和改善心理健康结果。土著人“关心国家”的概念成为一个中心主题,展示了统一的医疗保健方法的好处。这些发现表明,在环境和初级保健服务之间建立联系,有助于改善土著居民的健康。导致项目成功的因素包括社区参与、土著领导和有针对性的、基于地点的干预措施。然而,普遍缺乏已发表的证据表明环境卫生和初级保健可以可持续地结合起来。数量有限的例子表明了积极的健康结果,表明需要在初级保健中采取更多社区主导和以国家为中心的举措。
{"title":"Exploring best practices that integrate environmental health and primary healthcare in Indigenous populations: A scoping review","authors":"Jayden Wells ,&nbsp;Veronica Matthews ,&nbsp;Amal Chakraborty","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100071","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100071","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Country and the environment are essential components of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing. Colonisation disrupted these essential connections, damaging important reciprocal beneficial relationships that kept Country and community well. As a result, Indigenous populations exhibit poorer health outcomes compared with non-Indigenous Australians, with the life expectancy of Indigenous Australians being 74 years compared with 84 years in the general population. It is reported that 20 to 30 per cent of Indigenous disease burden can be attributed to environmental factors; however, historically, there has been little coordination between the environmental and primary healthcare sectors in Australia. The National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) has called for increased collaboration between environmental initiatives and primary healthcare to address various health disparities present within Indigenous Australians. This scoping review aimed to identify and analyse best practices that integrate environmental health initiatives and primary healthcare within Indigenous populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Standard scoping review methodology was employed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR Joannah Briggs Institute guidelines. Databases that were searched included CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE and Embase, as well as grey literature, between 2004–24. Inclusion criteria focused on studies involving international Indigenous populations, environmental health factors and primary healthcare integration, with two primary reviewers and a third for resolving conflicts.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>A total of 32 papers, primarily from Australia, were included in the final review. Regarding environmental determinants, there was a strong focus on housing condition, water quality and Indigenous land management. Various integrated programs demonstrated significant health improvements, such as reduced prevalence of infectious disease, enhanced cardiovascular health and better mental health outcomes. The concept of Indigenous 'caring for Country' emerged as a central theme, demonstrating the benefits of a unified approach to healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>These findings demonstrate the value of implementing connections between environmental and primary healthcare services in improving Indigenous health. Factors leading to program success included community participation, Indigenous leadership and targeted, place-based interventions. However, there is a general lack of published evidence that sustainably integrates both environmental health and primary care. The limited number of examples demonstrated positive health outcomes, indicating the need for more community-led and Country-centred initiatives within primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144596007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing health system accountability: A scoping review of cultural security and Indigenous health 推进卫生系统问责制:文化安全和土著居民健康的范围审查
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100073
Brianna Poirier (Canadian), Madison Cachagee (Omushkego Mushkegowuk), Lisa Jamieson (New Zealander)

Purpose

Despite the countless frameworks emphasising the need for culturally safe provision of care, systemic racism persists and, in some cases, the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous health has widened. Cultural security is differentiated from cultural safety due to its demand of system-level changes that inform provision of care. Confusion with a myriad of other cultural terminologies has diluted the nuances between actions required to create culturally secure environments. Therefore, this scoping review was undertaken to explore existing evidence that contributes to the understandings and applications of cultural security for global Indigenous peoples across all health contexts, while recognising the potential overlap with systems-level definitions of cultural safety and the opportunity to clarify the distinctive contributions of cultural security.

Methods

Two reviewers screened records from PubMed and then adapted for Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest and Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet. Inclusion in this review was not restricted by geographical location or language. Underscored by principles of critical realism and decolonising methodologies, principles related to the implementation and understanding of cultural security were extracted from each of the included articles and synthesised into common categories.

Main findings

The systematic search identified 1,809 unique records, with 28 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four of the articles were related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health in Australia and four articles discussed Indigenous health globally. Evidence related to the understanding and implementation of cultural security was synthesised into 12 shared principles of cultural security. These principles focused on the importance of cultural identity, worldviews and values in healing, as well as the need for system level commitments and pathways of accountability for the creation of culturally secure environments.

Principal conclusions

Commitment to culturally secure provision of care at both an institutional and individual level is both an ethical and moral necessity for all healthcare providers. The balance of policy changes that incorporates space for living Indigenous cultures to ebb and flow necessitates a commitment to daily conversations, practices of reflexivity, and evaluation processes that measure service effectiveness for the Indigenous communities they serve.
目的尽管有无数框架强调需要以文化上安全的方式提供护理,但系统性的种族主义仍然存在,在某些情况下,土著和非土著之间的健康差距扩大了。文化安全不同于文化安全,因为它需要系统层面的变化,为提供护理提供信息。与无数其他文化术语的混淆已经淡化了创建文化安全环境所需的行动之间的细微差别。因此,开展这一范围审查是为了探索有助于在所有健康背景下对全球土著人民文化安全的理解和应用的现有证据,同时认识到文化安全与系统级定义的潜在重叠,并有机会澄清文化安全的独特贡献。方法两名审稿人从PubMed中筛选记录,然后在Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、ProQuest和Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet中进行改编。纳入本综述不受地理位置或语言的限制。在批判现实主义原则和非殖民化方法的强调下,从每一项所列条款中提取出与执行和理解文化安全有关的原则,并综合为共同类别。主要发现系统检索发现1809条独特记录,其中28条符合纳入标准。其中24篇文章与澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康有关,4篇文章讨论了全球土著居民的健康。与理解和实施文化安全有关的证据被综合为12项共同的文化安全原则。这些原则侧重于文化认同、世界观和价值观在治疗中的重要性,以及为创造文化安全环境作出系统层面承诺和问责途径的必要性。承诺在机构和个人层面上提供文化上安全的护理是所有医疗保健提供者在伦理和道德上的必要性。政策变化的平衡包含了原住民文化的起落空间,因此必须致力于日常对话、反思实践和评估程序,以衡量他们所服务的原住民社区的服务效率。
{"title":"Advancing health system accountability: A scoping review of cultural security and Indigenous health","authors":"Brianna Poirier (Canadian),&nbsp;Madison Cachagee (Omushkego Mushkegowuk),&nbsp;Lisa Jamieson (New Zealander)","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100073","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100073","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Despite the countless frameworks emphasising the need for culturally safe provision of care, systemic racism persists and, in some cases, the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous health has widened. Cultural security is differentiated from cultural safety due to its demand of system-level changes that inform provision of care. Confusion with a myriad of other cultural terminologies has diluted the nuances between actions required to create culturally secure environments. Therefore, this scoping review was undertaken to explore existing evidence that contributes to the understandings and applications of cultural security for global Indigenous peoples across all health contexts, while recognising the potential overlap with systems-level definitions of cultural safety and the opportunity to clarify the distinctive contributions of cultural security.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two reviewers screened records from PubMed and then adapted for Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest and Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet. Inclusion in this review was not restricted by geographical location or language. Underscored by principles of critical realism and decolonising methodologies, principles related to the implementation and understanding of cultural security were extracted from each of the included articles and synthesised into common categories.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The systematic search identified 1,809 unique records, with 28 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four of the articles were related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health in Australia and four articles discussed Indigenous health globally. Evidence related to the understanding and implementation of cultural security was synthesised into 12 shared principles of cultural security. These principles focused on the importance of cultural identity, worldviews and values in healing, as well as the need for system level commitments and pathways of accountability for the creation of culturally secure environments.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>Commitment to culturally secure provision of care at both an institutional and individual level is both an ethical and moral necessity for all healthcare providers. The balance of policy changes that incorporates space for living Indigenous cultures to ebb and flow necessitates a commitment to daily conversations, practices of reflexivity, and evaluation processes that measure service effectiveness for the Indigenous communities they serve.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144670418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Victorian Aboriginal services co-creating knowledge about healing and recovery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivors of child sexual abuse: A study protocol 维多利亚州土著服务机构共同创造关于土著和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童性虐待幸存者的治疗和康复知识:一项研究协议
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100076
Graham Gee , Carlina Black , Stella Mulder , Stephanie J. Brown , Jordan Gibbs , Laura Biggs , Helen Kennedy , Helen Milroy
Child sexual abuse is a human rights and public health issue with harmful impacts on individuals, families and communities of all nations and cultures. There is a lack of research on healing and recovery from child sexual abuse for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, families and communities. This protocol describes a program of research that was co-designed with practitioners and senior staff from six Aboriginal partner services dedicated to supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivors of child sexual abuse in the Australian state of Victoria. This multi-method study is grounded in Indigenous research methodologies and methods of data generation, in addition to complementary Western methodologies and methods of data analysis. The overarching aim of the project that this program of research is situated within is to better understand and respond to the experiences and healing needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with lived experience of child sexual abuse.
The specific aims for the first phase of research outlined in this protocol are to: (1) strengthen the wellbeing and capacity of the workforce dedicated to supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivors of child sexual abuse; and (2) build a Victorian workforce understanding of the experiences and processes of healing in relation to child sexual abuse from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives. The protocol outlines three related research activities, which make up this first phase of the study. The first activity involves cultural wellbeing and yarning gatherings for staff of the partner services to yarn about healing from child sexual abuse. This research activity utilises yarning and a grounded theory approach. The second activity involves an evaluation of a community of practice for staff, utilising yarning and reflexive thematic analysis. The third activity is a scoping review that investigates Indigenous peoples’ experiences of healing from child sexual abuse and utilises thematic analysis. This co-designed program of research focuses on supporting practitioners and services dedicated to survivors of child sexual abuse through the development of new knowledge inclusive of practice wisdom and privileging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledges.
儿童性虐待是一个人权和公共卫生问题,对所有国家和文化的个人、家庭和社区产生有害影响。原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民个人、家庭和社区对儿童性虐待的治疗和恢复缺乏研究。本协议描述了一项研究计划,该计划是与来自六个土著合作伙伴服务机构的从业人员和高级工作人员共同设计的,致力于支持澳大利亚维多利亚州土著和托雷斯海峡岛民遭受儿童性虐待的幸存者。这种多方法研究基于本土研究方法和数据生成方法,以及互补的西方方法和数据分析方法。这个研究项目的总体目标是更好地理解和回应有过儿童性虐待经历的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的经历和治疗需求。本议定书概述的第一阶段研究的具体目标是:(1)加强致力于支持遭受儿童性虐待的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民幸存者的工作人员的福祉和能力;(2)从原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的角度,建立维多利亚州劳动力对与儿童性虐待有关的治疗经历和过程的理解。该方案概述了三个相关的研究活动,它们构成了研究的第一阶段。第一项活动包括文化福利和为合作伙伴服务的工作人员讲述如何从儿童性虐待中康复的故事。这项研究活动利用了编织和扎根理论的方法。第二项活动涉及利用编织和反思性专题分析对工作人员的实践社区进行评估。第三项活动是范围审查,调查土著人民从儿童性虐待中康复的经验,并利用专题分析。这个共同设计的研究项目侧重于通过开发包括实践智慧和特权土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民知识在内的新知识,支持致力于儿童性虐待幸存者的从业人员和服务。
{"title":"Victorian Aboriginal services co-creating knowledge about healing and recovery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivors of child sexual abuse: A study protocol","authors":"Graham Gee ,&nbsp;Carlina Black ,&nbsp;Stella Mulder ,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Brown ,&nbsp;Jordan Gibbs ,&nbsp;Laura Biggs ,&nbsp;Helen Kennedy ,&nbsp;Helen Milroy","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100076","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100076","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Child sexual abuse is a human rights and public health issue with harmful impacts on individuals, families and communities of all nations and cultures. There is a lack of research on healing and recovery from child sexual abuse for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, families and communities. This protocol describes a program of research that was co-designed with practitioners and senior staff from six Aboriginal partner services dedicated to supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivors of child sexual abuse in the Australian state of Victoria. This multi-method study is grounded in Indigenous research methodologies and methods of data generation, in addition to complementary Western methodologies and methods of data analysis. The overarching aim of the project that this program of research is situated within is to better understand and respond to the experiences and healing needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with lived experience of child sexual abuse.</div><div>The specific aims for the first phase of research outlined in this protocol are to: (1) strengthen the wellbeing and capacity of the workforce dedicated to supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander survivors of child sexual abuse; and (2) build a Victorian workforce understanding of the experiences and processes of healing in relation to child sexual abuse from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives. The protocol outlines three related research activities, which make up this first phase of the study. The first activity involves cultural wellbeing and yarning gatherings for staff of the partner services to yarn about healing from child sexual abuse. This research activity utilises yarning and a grounded theory approach. The second activity involves an evaluation of a community of practice for staff, utilising yarning and reflexive thematic analysis. The third activity is a scoping review that investigates Indigenous peoples’ experiences of healing from child sexual abuse and utilises thematic analysis. This co-designed program of research focuses on supporting practitioners and services dedicated to survivors of child sexual abuse through the development of new knowledge inclusive of practice wisdom and privileging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100076"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144895792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers’ voices on the rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the field of health and medical research 土著和托雷斯海峡岛民研究人员对卫生和医学研究领域的主权和自决权的声音
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100094
Felicity Collis (Gomeroi) , Kade Booth , Jamie Bryant , Catherine Chamberlain (Palawa) , Jaquelyne T. Hughes (Wagadagam) , Kalinda Griffiths (Yawuru) , Mark Wenitong (Kabi Kabi) , Peter O’Mara (Wiradjuri) , Alex Brown (Yuin) , Sandra Eades (Noongar) , Kelvin Kong (Worimi) , Michelle Kennedy (Wiradjuri)
Due to exclusionary policies, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have only been invited to be part of academic institutions in Australia for the past 65 years. Previous research has highlighted the negative and harmful experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander academics and students. Within health and medical research, there are a growing number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers; however, less is known about the nuanced and complex challenges faced when they are required to operate within research institutions and universities. This study aimed to examine the experiences and perspectives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers working in the field of health and medical research. Sixteen Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge holders (researchers) shared their wisdom and stories, utilising a qualitative yarning method. One main theme emerged throughout the study: coloniality is entrenched, reinforced and upheld by institutional systems and structures in the field of health and medical research. Knowledge holder highlighted the ongoing burden, harm and violence inflicted within the field of health and medical research. Whilst there have been systems and ethical processes built to safeguard communities, these often add additional burden for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers enacting them. Senior knowledge holders highlighted their attempts to change colonial practices within institutions by seeking higher positions of influence to effect meaningful reform, which often resulted in further entrenched harm and burnout. The silencing and erasure of Indigenous knowledges continues to occur when institutions employ performative progressivism. Despite this harm and colonial violence, the resilience and perseverance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples persist. The collective strength of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is paramount to resisting institutional coloniality and will remain steadfast despite colonial agendas. Research institutions and universities must continue to progress through truth-telling that ensures that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ sovereignty, knowledges and knowledge systems are truly upheld in the field of health and medical research.
由于排他性政策,在过去的65年里,土著和托雷斯海峡岛民只被邀请成为澳大利亚学术机构的一部分。先前的研究强调了原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民学者和学生的负面和有害经历。在保健和医学研究方面,土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的研究人员越来越多;然而,当他们被要求在研究机构和大学内运作时,所面临的微妙而复杂的挑战却鲜为人知。本研究旨在探讨土著和托雷斯海峡岛民在健康和医学研究领域工作的研究人员的经验和观点。16位原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民知识持有者(研究人员)利用定性编织方法分享了他们的智慧和故事。在整个研究中出现了一个主题:殖民主义在卫生和医学研究领域的体制系统和结构中得到巩固、加强和支持。知识持有人强调了在卫生和医学研究领域内造成的持续负担、伤害和暴力。虽然已经建立了保护社区的制度和道德程序,但这些往往给制定这些制度的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民研究人员增加了额外的负担。资深知识持有者强调,他们试图通过寻求更有影响力的职位来改变机构内的殖民做法,以实现有意义的改革,这往往导致进一步根深蒂固的伤害和倦怠。当机构采用表演进步主义时,土著知识的沉默和抹去继续发生。尽管有这种伤害和殖民暴力,土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民的复原力和毅力仍然存在。土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的集体力量对于抵制体制殖民至关重要,尽管有殖民议程,他们仍将坚定不移。研究机构和大学必须通过讲真话继续取得进展,确保土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的主权、知识和知识体系在保健和医学研究领域得到真正维护。
{"title":"Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers’ voices on the rights to sovereignty and self-determination in the field of health and medical research","authors":"Felicity Collis (Gomeroi) ,&nbsp;Kade Booth ,&nbsp;Jamie Bryant ,&nbsp;Catherine Chamberlain (Palawa) ,&nbsp;Jaquelyne T. Hughes (Wagadagam) ,&nbsp;Kalinda Griffiths (Yawuru) ,&nbsp;Mark Wenitong (Kabi Kabi) ,&nbsp;Peter O’Mara (Wiradjuri) ,&nbsp;Alex Brown (Yuin) ,&nbsp;Sandra Eades (Noongar) ,&nbsp;Kelvin Kong (Worimi) ,&nbsp;Michelle Kennedy (Wiradjuri)","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100094","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100094","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to exclusionary policies, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have only been invited to be part of academic institutions in Australia for the past 65 years. Previous research has highlighted the negative and harmful experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander academics and students. Within health and medical research, there are a growing number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers; however, less is known about the nuanced and complex challenges faced when they are required to operate within research institutions and universities. This study aimed to examine the experiences and perspectives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers working in the field of health and medical research. Sixteen Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge holders (researchers) shared their wisdom and stories, utilising a qualitative yarning method. One main theme emerged throughout the study: coloniality is entrenched, reinforced and upheld by institutional systems and structures in the field of health and medical research. Knowledge holder highlighted the ongoing burden, harm and violence inflicted within the field of health and medical research. Whilst there have been systems and ethical processes built to safeguard communities, these often add additional burden for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers enacting them. Senior knowledge holders highlighted their attempts to change colonial practices within institutions by seeking higher positions of influence to effect meaningful reform, which often resulted in further entrenched harm and burnout. The silencing and erasure of Indigenous knowledges continues to occur when institutions employ performative progressivism. Despite this harm and colonial violence, the resilience and perseverance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples persist. The collective strength of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is paramount to resisting institutional coloniality and will remain steadfast despite colonial agendas. Research institutions and universities must continue to progress through truth-telling that ensures that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ sovereignty, knowledges and knowledge systems are truly upheld in the field of health and medical research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First Peoples’ cultural medicines: A review of Australian health policies using an Indigenous critical discourse analysis approach 第一民族的文化药物:使用土著批评话语分析方法审查澳大利亚卫生政策
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100046
Alana Gall (Pakana, Truwulway) , Mike Stephens , Zyana Gall (Pakana, Truwulway) , Danielle Armour (Kamilaroi) , Nicole Hewlett (Melukerdee, Palawa) , Michelle Kennedy (Wiradjuri) , Theresa Sainty (Pakana, Truwulway) , Allyra Hulme (Wiradjuri) , Jon Wardle , Megan Campbell , Andrew T. Gall (Pakana, Truwulway) , Amie Furlong , Kate Anderson

Purpose

First Peoples in Australia tend to have shared holistic understandings of health and wellbeing that emphasise strong interconnections among family, community, culture and Country. Central to this holistic health framework is First Peoples’ cultural medicines, which most First Peoples use or want to use, and have been used for millennia to heal the bodies, minds and spirits of First Peoples. This review aimed to explore and document the inclusion and representation of cultural medicines across national level policies and practice guidelines for health professionals. These policies intend to support effective and appropriate healthcare for all Australians, including First Peoples.

Methods

Australian national health policies that guide the practice of Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registered health professionals and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers/Indigenous liaison officers were systematically reviewed to explore their representation of cultural medicines in these policies. The review was informed by Indigenous critical discourse analysis that was modified to suit the review context. National level health policies from March to June 2023 were mapped and 52 policies eligible for inclusion were identified. Policies were downloaded and imported into NVivo for analysis. NVivo text search queries were conducted and nine policies were found to include any content about cultural medicines.

Main findings

Three overarching themes were found: 1) Absence of national leadership; 2) Disproportionate onus placed on Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health practitioners; and 3) Lack of detail and actionable directives. There was a distinct lack of representation of cultural medicines in national health policies, with most of these policies not providing any clear guidance for health professionals. The responsibility was too heavily placed on First Peoples health professionals to lead the healthcare related to cultural medicines.

Principal conclusions

The significant lack of national leadership and actionable directives around cultural medicines is concerning. To uphold cultural safety and the rights of Australia’s First Peoples, it is critical to have clear policy guidance, resources and training that support all Australian health professionals to engage with cultural medicines and see it as part of their responsibility.
目的澳大利亚原住民往往对健康和福祉有着共同的整体理解,强调家庭、社区、文化和国家之间的紧密联系。这种整体健康框架的核心是原住民的文化药物,大多数原住民都使用或希望使用这些药物,几千年来,这些药物一直被用来治疗原住民的身体、思想和精神。本次审查旨在探索和记录文化药物在国家级政策和卫生专业人员实践指南中的纳入和代表性。这些政策旨在为包括原住民在内的所有澳大利亚人提供有效、适当的医疗保健服务。方法:对指导澳大利亚卫生从业者监管局注册卫生专业人员以及土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民卫生工作者/土著联络官实践的澳大利亚国家卫生政策进行了系统性审查,以探讨这些政策中对文化药物的表述。审查参考了土著批判性话语分析,并根据审查背景进行了修改。绘制了 2023 年 3 月至 6 月的国家级卫生政策图,并确定了 52 项符合纳入条件的政策。政策被下载并导入 NVivo 进行分析。NVivo 文本搜索查询结果显示,有九项政策包含任何有关文化药物的内容。主要研究发现有三个重要主题:1)缺乏国家领导;2)土著居民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民医疗从业者承担了过重的责任;3)缺乏细节和可操作的指令。国家卫生政策中明显缺乏对文化药物的体现,大多数政策都没有为卫生专业人员提供明确的指导。主要结论在文化药物方面严重缺乏国家领导和可操作的指令令人担忧。为了维护文化安全和澳大利亚原住民的权利,关键是要有明确的政策指导、资源和培训,以支持所有澳大利亚卫生专业人员参与文化药物工作,并将其视为自身责任的一部分。
{"title":"First Peoples’ cultural medicines: A review of Australian health policies using an Indigenous critical discourse analysis approach","authors":"Alana Gall (Pakana, Truwulway) ,&nbsp;Mike Stephens ,&nbsp;Zyana Gall (Pakana, Truwulway) ,&nbsp;Danielle Armour (Kamilaroi) ,&nbsp;Nicole Hewlett (Melukerdee, Palawa) ,&nbsp;Michelle Kennedy (Wiradjuri) ,&nbsp;Theresa Sainty (Pakana, Truwulway) ,&nbsp;Allyra Hulme (Wiradjuri) ,&nbsp;Jon Wardle ,&nbsp;Megan Campbell ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Gall (Pakana, Truwulway) ,&nbsp;Amie Furlong ,&nbsp;Kate Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100046","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100046","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>First Peoples in Australia tend to have shared holistic understandings of health and wellbeing that emphasise strong interconnections among family, community, culture and Country. Central to this holistic health framework is First Peoples’ cultural medicines, which most First Peoples use or want to use, and have been used for millennia to heal the bodies, minds and spirits of First Peoples. This review aimed to explore and document the inclusion and representation of cultural medicines across national level policies and practice guidelines for health professionals. These policies intend to support effective and appropriate healthcare for all Australians, including First Peoples.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Australian national health policies that guide the practice of Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registered health professionals and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers/Indigenous liaison officers were systematically reviewed to explore their representation of cultural medicines in these policies. The review was informed by Indigenous critical discourse analysis that was modified to suit the review context. National level health policies from March to June 2023 were mapped and 52 policies eligible for inclusion were identified. Policies were downloaded and imported into NVivo for analysis. NVivo text search queries were conducted and nine policies were found to include any content about cultural medicines.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>Three overarching themes were found: 1) Absence of national leadership; 2) Disproportionate onus placed on Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health practitioners; and 3) Lack of detail and actionable directives. There was a distinct lack of representation of cultural medicines in national health policies, with most of these policies not providing any clear guidance for health professionals. The responsibility was too heavily placed on First Peoples health professionals to lead the healthcare related to cultural medicines.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The significant lack of national leadership and actionable directives around cultural medicines is concerning. To uphold cultural safety and the rights of Australia’s First Peoples, it is critical to have clear policy guidance, resources and training that support all Australian health professionals to engage with cultural medicines and see it as part of their responsibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143829695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empirical assessment of cultural safety within Australian hospitals highlights the impact of access to Aboriginal hospital liaison officers on the experiences of Aboriginal patients 对澳大利亚医院内文化安全的实证评估强调了接触土著医院联络官对土著病人经历的影响
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100061
Elissa Elvidge , Steven L. Taylor , Kiara Harvey , Yeena Thompson , Jessica Armao , Geraint B. Rogers , Amy Creighton , Yin Paradies

Purpose

Ensuring access to hospital services that are culturally safe is imperative for improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes. Addressing failings within existing services relies on the ability to prioritise areas for improvement in a methodologically robust manner that reflects the experiences of Indigenous service users. The construct and content validity of the Cultural Safety Survey, a mixed-methods questionnaire-based tool that captures the lived experiences of First Nations peoples attending hospital, was previously established. This study aimed to identify hospital and participant characteristics associated with positive or negative experiences of care.

Methods

Study sites included 49 hospitals in New South Wales, either through direct engagement with the hospital or opportunistic participant recruitment. A total of 413 participants took part in the study; 307 completed the whole survey and 298 of them had complete hospital and demographic data for analysis. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to identify contributors to composite and domain-specific cultural safety scores. Assessed variables included respondent age, gender, distance travelled, attendance capacity (patient or visitor), hospital size, remoteness and socioeconomic status of location. Additional analysis assessing reported interaction with an Aboriginal hospital liaison officer (AHLO) on cultural safety scores was also performed.

Main findings

Of 413 participants, 298 provided complete demographic and hospital data, and confirmed informed consent. Responses related to 49 separate hospitals in New South Wales. Participant age and level of interaction with an AHLO showed a consistently positive association with cultural safety score. A unit increase in age was associated with 51.3% increased odds of a higher overall cultural safety score (P = .0012). Similarly, each unit increase in AHLO interaction was associated with 89.3% greater likelihood of a higher cultural safety score (P = .0031). Other variables – including higher socioeconomic advantage, female gender, and a shorter distance travelled – were positively associated with specific cultural safety domains. Respondent comments captured in the free text component of the questionnaire were consistent with quantitative findings.

Principal conclusions

The findings highlight the importance of access to an AHLO when visiting hospital. More generally, the ability to quantify the performance of hospital services based on the experiences of Indigenous end-users, and to identify factors that contribute to the nature of those interactions, provides a potential guide for impactful service reform.
目的确保获得文化上安全的医院服务是改善土著和托雷斯海峡岛民健康结果的必要条件。解决现有服务中的缺陷取决于能否以反映土著服务使用者经验的方法强有力的方式确定需要改进的领域的优先次序。文化安全调查是一种以问卷为基础的混合方法工具,记录了第一民族住院患者的生活经历,其结构和内容有效性是先前建立的。本研究旨在确定医院和参与者与积极或消极护理经验相关的特征。研究地点包括新南威尔士州的49家医院,通过直接与医院接触或机会性招募参与者。共有413名参与者参加了这项研究;307人完成了全部调查,其中298人有完整的医院和人口统计资料供分析。使用多变量有序逻辑回归来确定复合和特定领域文化安全得分的贡献者。评估的变量包括被调查者的年龄、性别、旅行距离、就诊能力(病人或访客)、医院规模、偏远程度和所在地的社会经济地位。还进行了其他分析,评估报告的与土著医院联络官(AHLO)在文化安全评分方面的相互作用。在413名参与者中,298名提供了完整的人口统计和医院数据,并确认知情同意。答复涉及新南威尔士州49家独立医院。参与者的年龄和与AHLO的互动水平与文化安全得分呈一致的正相关。年龄单位增加与总体文化安全评分增加51.3%的几率相关(P = 0.0012)。同样,AHLO相互作用每增加一个单位,较高文化安全评分的可能性增加89.3% (P = 0.0031)。其他变量——包括较高的社会经济优势、女性性别和较短的旅行距离——与特定的文化安全领域呈正相关。在问卷的自由文本部分中捕获的受访者评论与定量调查结果一致。主要结论研究结果强调了访问医院时获得AHLO的重要性。更一般地说,能够根据土著最终用户的经验量化医院服务的绩效,并确定促成这些相互作用性质的因素,为有效的服务改革提供了潜在的指导。
{"title":"Empirical assessment of cultural safety within Australian hospitals highlights the impact of access to Aboriginal hospital liaison officers on the experiences of Aboriginal patients","authors":"Elissa Elvidge ,&nbsp;Steven L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Kiara Harvey ,&nbsp;Yeena Thompson ,&nbsp;Jessica Armao ,&nbsp;Geraint B. Rogers ,&nbsp;Amy Creighton ,&nbsp;Yin Paradies","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100061","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100061","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Ensuring access to hospital services that are culturally safe is imperative for improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes. Addressing failings within existing services relies on the ability to prioritise areas for improvement in a methodologically robust manner that reflects the experiences of Indigenous service users. The construct and content validity of the Cultural Safety Survey, a mixed-methods questionnaire-based tool that captures the lived experiences of First Nations peoples attending hospital, was previously established. This study aimed to identify hospital and participant characteristics associated with positive or negative experiences of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Study sites included 49 hospitals in New South Wales, either through direct engagement with the hospital or opportunistic participant recruitment. A total of 413 participants took part in the study; 307 completed the whole survey and 298 of them had complete hospital and demographic data for analysis. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to identify contributors to composite and domain-specific cultural safety scores. Assessed variables included respondent age, gender, distance travelled, attendance capacity (patient or visitor), hospital size, remoteness and socioeconomic status of location. Additional analysis assessing reported interaction with an Aboriginal hospital liaison officer (AHLO) on cultural safety scores was also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>Of 413 participants, 298 provided complete demographic and hospital data, and confirmed informed consent. Responses related to 49 separate hospitals in New South Wales. Participant age and level of interaction with an AHLO showed a consistently positive association with cultural safety score. A unit increase in age was associated with 51.3% increased odds of a higher overall cultural safety score (<em>P</em> = .0012). Similarly, each unit increase in AHLO interaction was associated with 89.3% greater likelihood of a higher cultural safety score (<em>P</em> = .0031). Other variables – including higher socioeconomic advantage, female gender, and a shorter distance travelled – were positively associated with specific cultural safety domains. Respondent comments captured in the free text component of the questionnaire were consistent with quantitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the importance of access to an AHLO when visiting hospital. More generally, the ability to quantify the performance of hospital services based on the experiences of Indigenous end-users, and to identify factors that contribute to the nature of those interactions, provides a potential guide for impactful service reform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144169613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Communities getting things done: Māori community leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic 社区办事:Māori 2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的社区领导
Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100080
Jodie Robertson, Tasha Burton, Anna Rolleston

Purpose

In 2023, researchers from Tauranga, Aotearoa New Zealand (hereinafter referred to as Aotearoa) carried out a study to explore the unique strengths of Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa) services in addressing the needs of their communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Two case studies of Māori providers in the North Island’s Bay of Plenty region were undertaken. A qualitative kaupapa Māori (philosophical doctrine) approach was utilised across three methods to inform the research: 1) review of community materials, 2) whakawhiti kōrero (reciprocal discussions), and 3) whānau (family) narratives. The research included 34 participants, sourced from three groups: kaiwhakahaere (leadership), kaimahi (workforce), and whānau.

Main findings

Community-led pandemic responses within Māori communities included a drive for coordinated, localised and Indigenous leadership, and a need for urgent community-led action that interrupted the trajectory of Crown-determined processes. Successful health interventions leveraged local knowledge, whakapapa (genealogical) connections, and services through community-led action. This required levels of leadership and self-determination that cannot be replicated through Crown-led, Crown-determined responses to healthcare. This research provides an evidence-based framework consisting of 23 strategies to increase equitable health outcomes for Indigenous and other marginalised and/or isolated communities.

Principal conclusions

This research underscores the importance of enabling communities to lead through their own models of leadership and community development, recognising that they possess the intimate knowledge and understanding necessary to effectively respond to the specific needs of their people at whānau, hāpori (community), hapū and iwi (tribal) levels. Six generations of evidence show that the health system is not working equally for all parts of Aotearoa. It is time for an urgent response to those everyday health issues that have become an area of pandemic need. This research concluded to seriously consider the evidence that Māori communities, Māori providers and Māori clinicians led the way during the pandemic. As a nation, if we want to genuinely change the trajectory of Māori health outcomes and health outcomes for all, we need to utilise the evidence that is before us in terms of recognising the value added in having Indigenous, community-led solutions.
2023年,来自新西兰奥特罗阿陶朗加(以下简称奥特罗阿)的研究人员开展了一项研究,探索Māori(奥特罗阿土著人)服务在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间满足其社区需求方面的独特优势。方法对北岛丰盛湾地区Māori服务提供者进行了两个案例研究。定性的kaupapa Māori(哲学学说)方法被用于三种方法来为研究提供信息:1)审查社区材料,2)whakawhiti kōrero(互惠讨论)和3)whānau(家庭)叙述。这项研究包括34名参与者,来自三个群体:kaiwhakahaere(领导)、kaimahi(劳动力)和whānau。主要发现:Māori社区内由社区主导的大流行病应对措施包括推动协调、地方和土著领导,以及需要采取紧急由社区主导的行动,以中断由政府决定的进程的轨迹。成功的卫生干预措施利用了当地知识、whakapapa(家谱)联系以及通过社区主导的行动提供的服务。这需要一定程度的领导力和自决权,这是政府主导、政府决定的医疗保健对策无法复制的。这项研究提供了一个以证据为基础的框架,包括23项战略,以提高土著和其他边缘化和/或孤立社区的公平健康结果。主要结论本研究强调了使社区能够通过自己的领导和社区发展模式发挥领导作用的重要性,认识到他们拥有必要的知识和理解,以有效地响应whānau, hāpori(社区),haphi和iwi(部落)层面的人民的具体需求。六代证据表明,卫生系统并没有平等地为奥特阿瓦的所有地区服务。现在是对那些已成为大流行需要的领域的日常卫生问题作出紧急反应的时候了。这项研究的结论是认真考虑Māori社区、Māori提供者和Māori临床医生在大流行期间发挥领导作用的证据。作为一个国家,如果我们想真正改变Māori健康结果和所有人健康结果的轨迹,我们需要利用摆在我们面前的证据,认识到土著社区主导的解决方案的附加价值。
{"title":"Communities getting things done: Māori community leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Jodie Robertson,&nbsp;Tasha Burton,&nbsp;Anna Rolleston","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100080","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100080","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In 2023, researchers from Tauranga, Aotearoa New Zealand (hereinafter referred to as Aotearoa) carried out a study to explore the unique strengths of Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa) services in addressing the needs of their communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two case studies of Māori providers in the North Island’s Bay of Plenty region were undertaken. A qualitative <em>kaupapa</em> Māori (philosophical doctrine) approach was utilised across three methods to inform the research: 1) review of community materials, 2) <em>whakawhiti kōrero</em> (reciprocal discussions), and 3) <em>whānau</em> (family) narratives. The research included 34 participants, sourced from three groups: <em>kaiwhakahaere</em> (leadership), <em>kaimahi</em> (workforce), and <em>whānau</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>Community-led pandemic responses within Māori communities included a drive for coordinated, localised and Indigenous leadership, and a need for urgent community-led action that interrupted the trajectory of Crown-determined processes. Successful health interventions leveraged local knowledge, <em>whakapapa</em> (genealogical) connections, and services through community-led action. This required levels of leadership and self-determination that cannot be replicated through Crown-led, Crown-determined responses to healthcare. This research provides an evidence-based framework consisting of 23 strategies to increase equitable health outcomes for Indigenous and other marginalised and/or isolated communities.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>This research underscores the importance of enabling communities to lead through their own models of leadership and community development, recognising that they possess the intimate knowledge and understanding necessary to effectively respond to the specific needs of their people at <em>whānau</em>, <em>hāpori</em> (community), <em>hapū</em> and <em>iwi</em> (tribal) levels. Six generations of evidence show that the health system is not working equally for all parts of Aotearoa. It is time for an urgent response to those everyday health issues that have become an area of pandemic need. This research concluded to seriously consider the evidence that Māori communities, Māori providers and Māori clinicians led the way during the pandemic. As a nation, if we want to genuinely change the trajectory of Māori health outcomes and health outcomes for all, we need to utilise the evidence that is before us in terms of recognising the value added in having Indigenous, community-led solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144831359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1