Global or near global elevation models than TanDEM-X Edited Digital Elevation Model (EDEM), ALOS World 3D (AW3D), SRTM and ASTER GDEM (GDEM) show some systematic errors which can be determined and respected by accurate reference Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). Of course, if accurate DEMs are available, they can be used instead, but with ICESat-2 satellite LiDAR profiles accurate reference data are available that can be used to improve the freely available DEMs worldwide. The density of the ICESat-2 LiDAR ground points for the ATL08-data is limited to approximately 100 m in orbit direction and even just up to over 1 km between the orbits, but this is sufficient for improving the free DEMs. The correction can involve a simple elevation shift, a model tilt, or a correction by higher-order systematic errors.
A comparison with reference data from aerial survey revealed a bias in the range of ∼2m, which could also be due the aerial photogrammetric reference data. A comparison of the ICESat-2 data with the freely available AW3D and EDEM yielded satisfactory results, after improvement by bias and model tilt correction. The original RMSZ of EDEM compared to the reference DTM could be reduced from 2.23m to 1.30 m by height model tilt and shift determined by ICESat-2 and for AW3D from originally 1.81 m–1.64 m. In this data set, the influence of systematic errors is limited, it reduced the deformations slightly, but the accuracy numbers only had a negligible improvement. SRTM and ASTER GDEM should no longer be used due to their significantly lower accuracy compared to EDEM and AW3D.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
