Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), an advanced technology that is designed to record and decode brain activity, may transmit information communication between the brain and external devices, such as computers, wheelchairs, and robotic arms1 (Figure 1). Elon Musk recently tweeted: his Neuralink company revolutionizes BCI technology, announcing a clinical trial of the implantation of a “brain-reading” device into a human, which has enlightened the field of neurotechnology. This trial represents a milestone in the long journey to improve BCIs, a scientific area aimed to restore functionality to those with severe paralysis and expanding the boundaries of human-machine interaction.
This innovative technology might transform the lives of individuals with motor disabilities, enabling them to control a computer, robotic arm, wheelchair, or other device by thinking about it and interact with the world through these devices. Neuralink's device is not the only BCI technology under development. Other companies and research groups, like BCI Pioneers Coalition, are also working on similar technologies, and some of them have earlier entered to human trials. If proven its effectivity and safety, Nerualink's device may significantly change the field (Figure 1).
However, announcing the trial has also raised a slew of concerns. First, the lack of detailed information about the trial has frustrated some neuroscientists and engineers. While we heard information about the trial's commencement that may be found in a proper channel. The main source of public information lacks crucial details, such as the location of implantations and exact outcomes, which may complicate the trial and cause anxiety in the public.
In addition, there is no registration about this trial at ClinicalTrials.gov, raising ethical concerns. Registration at this online repository is typically required by trial institutes to ensure transparency and adherence to ethical principles designed to protect participants in clinical trials. If bypassed these important checks and balances, the trial may compromise the safety and well-being of the participants.
Another dispute with the Neuralink's trial is that its pre-existing animal experiments caused too many animal deaths. According to the Reuters in December 2022, Neuralink's trials resulted in the deaths of more than 1500 animals, and an employee wrote internally to point out that the company's rush to meet the schedule caused many employees to be nervous, thus increasing the non-essential suffering and death of the animals under test. Miguel Nicolelis, professor of neuroscience at Duke University School of Medicine in the United States (father of brain computer interface), has previously said that invasive brain computer interfaces are for scientific research, and are not the best choice for patients, and the implantation method should be limited to very serious cases.
Despite these potential adve