Clinical breast cancer最新文献

Introduction

Young women with breast cancer (BC) may experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss secondary to cancer treatment effects on estrogen levels. Studies assessing BMD in BC patients have had a limited representation of young women. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed the frequency of low BMD and associated factors in this age group.

Methods

Women diagnosed with stage 0-III BC at ≤40 years, treated with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy between 2010 and 2020 at 5 Mexican BC referral centers were eligible. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were collected, as well as bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) results. Low BMD was defined as lumbar or femoral neck T-score < -1.0 or Z-score ≤ -2.0.

Results

A total of 1259 patients were included; median age at diagnosis was 36 years (21-40). Overall, 93% received chemotherapy and 65% endocrine therapy (tamoxifen was received at some point by 61%, aromatase inhibitors by 17%, and GnRH agonists/bilateral oophorectomy by 21%). DEXA scans were documented in 254 (20%), of which 163 (64%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 58%-70%) had a low BMD report. Low BMD was associated with receiving aromatase inhibitors (Odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.13-3.24), and GnRH agonists/bilateral oophorectomy (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.21-4.21).

Conclusion

The suboptimal frequency of BMD monitoring observed displays an alarming disregard for bone health in young patients. Thus, a high proportion of women with low BMD are potentially being missed and precluded from the opportunity to receive timely interventions. Particular focus should be put on BMD monitoring among patients treated with aromatase inhibitors, GnRH agonists or bilateral oophorectomy.

Introduction

Clinical trial data indicate that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is feasible and may reduce morbidity for carefully selected patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). However, there remains a need to understand how these findings translate to broader clinical practice and to identify which patients benefit most. This study utilizes a national dataset to assess outcomes in axillary management, aiming to inform best practice in axillary de-escalation.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women diagnosed with clinically node-positive invasive breast cancer between 2012 to 2020 who received NCT and subsequent ALND. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and axillary pCR were analyzed statistically.

Results

Of the 59,791 patients included, 8,827 (14.76%) achieved nodal pCR. Patients with HR-negative and HER2-positive receptor status more frequently underwent ALND instead of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conversely, patients over the age of 70, those with private or public insurance, and cases classified as ypT1 or ypT2 were less likely to undergo ALND.

Conclusion

A subset of patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer received ALND despite achieving axillary pCR following NCT. This highlights an opportunity to enhance precision in identifying candidates for axillary de-escalation, potentially reducing morbidity and tailoring treatment more closely to individual patient needs.

Traditionally, management of early-stage breast cancer has required adjuvant radiation therapy following breast conserving surgery, due to decreased local recurrence and breast cancer mortality. However, over the past decade, there has been an increasing emphasis on potential overtreatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This has given rise to questions of how to optimize deintensification of treatment in this cohort of patients while maintaining clinical outcomes. A multitude of studies have focused on identification of a subset of patients with invasive breast cancer who were at low risk of local recurrence based on clinicopathologic features and therefore suitable for RT omission. These studies have failed to identify a subset that does not from RT with respect to local control. Several ongoing trials are evaluating alternative approaches to deintensification while focusing on tumor biology. With regards to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the role of RT has been questioned since breast conservation was utilized. Paralleling invasive disease studies, studies have sought to use clinicopathologic features to identify low risk patients suitable for RT omission but have failed to identify a subset that does not from RT with respect to local control. Use of new assays in patients with DCIS may represent the ideal approach for risk stratification and appropriate deintensification. At this time, when considering deintensification, individualizing treatment decisions with a focus on shared decision making is paramount.

Background

Young women with breast cancer (YWBC; ≤40 years) often have a poorer prognosis than older women with breast cancer (OWBC; ≥65 years). We explored molecular features of tumors from YWBC and OWBC to identify a biologic connection for these patterns.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the molecular profiles of 1879 breast tumors. Testing included immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and next-generation sequencing. Statistical analyses included Pearson's chi² test for comparisons, with significance defined as FDR (false discovery rate)-P < .05.

Results

TP53 and BRCA1 somatic mutations were more common in YWBC tumors than in OWBC tumors (53%, 42%; P = .0001, FDR-P = .0025 and 7%, 2%; P = .0001, FDR-P = .0025; respectively). Conversely, OWBC tumors had higher androgen receptor expression (55%, 45%; P = .0002, FDR-P = .0025) higher PD-L1 expression detected by IHC (8%, 5%; P = .0476, FDR-P = .2754), and more frequent PIK3CA mutations (33%, 17%; P = < .0001, FDR-P = < .0001). Among HR+/HER2- samples, YWBC had more gene amplifications in FGF3 (27%, 10%; P = .0353, FDR-P = .2462), FGF4 (27%, 9%; P = .0218, FDR-P = .1668), FGF19 (30%, 12%; P = .034, FDR-P = .2462) and CCND1 (37%, 18%; P = .0344, FDR-P = .2462) than OWBC.

Conclusions

Our data suggest distinct molecular aberrations exist between YWBC and OWBC. Exploiting these molecular changes could refine our treatment strategies in YWBC and OWBC.

Background

Risk-reducing mastectomy is recommended for high-risk patients but may have significant psychological consequences. This study aimed to determine the differences in anxiety, depressive symptomatology, body image and quality of life in women with an increased risk of breast cancer immediately before and after undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy.

Methods

Eighty-eight women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to BRCA1/2 mutations or a previous cancer diagnosis participated in this study. Instruments used were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Body Image Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast 23, administered 15-30 days before and after surgery.

Results

Following surgery, there was an immediate and significant worsening in anxiety, depressive symptomatology and body image. There was a significant deterioration in global, physical, role, and social functioning, as well as in body image and sexual enjoyment scales. Additionally, there were increases in fatigue, nausea and vomiting, constipation, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, perceived financial difficulties, pain, systemic therapy side effects, and breast and arm symptoms. However, there was an improvement in future perspective. These changes occurred independently of whether participants had a cancer diagnosis or BRCA1/2 mutation.

Conclusion

Risk-reducing mastectomies have immediate psychological consequences. While these procedures improve future health perspective, they increase anxiety and depressive symptomatology and decrease body image and quality of life, regardless of cancer diagnosis or BRCA1/2 mutation. These findings highlight the psychological consequences of such surgical procedures, emphasizing the need for comprehensive psychological interventions both before and after surgery.

Introduction/Background

To assess racial/ethnic disparities in endocrine therapy (ET) adherence among women with breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) linked to Arkansas Cancer Registry (ACR). Women with stages 0-3 HR+ breast cancer diagnosed in 2013-2017 were followed from cancer diagnosis for a year to determine ET initiation. Among women who initiated ETs within 1 year of diagnosis, we assessed first-year compliance (proportion of days covered ≥ 0.8) and followed them for 5 years, censoring at death, end of data availability (December 21, 2019), or disenrollment from insurance coverage, whichever occurred first, to determine time to discontinuation. Regression analysis was conducted to determine racial/ethnic disparities in ET use adjusting for patients demographic, clinical, tumor characteristics and county-level socioeconomic factors.

Results

Among women with continuous insurance coverage, 81% initiated ET within 1 year of diagnosis; 80% were compliant in the first year of ET use and 27.4% discontinued ET by year 5 among those who initiated ET in the first year. There were no racial/ethnic differences in ET initiation or first-year compliance adjusting for covariates. NHB women were significantly less likely to discontinue ET within 5 years after ET initiation compared to NHW women after (HR, 95% CI, 0.76, 0.58-0.98; P = .035).

Conclusion

After adjusting for patients’ and tumor characteristics, there were no racial/ethnic differences in ET initiation within 1 year of diagnosis and ET compliance within first year of ET use. However, NHB women were less likely to discontinue ET within 5 years of initiation.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Background

Current guidelines do not recommend routine sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), except in the setting of mastectomy or microinvasive disease. This study aimed to evaluate national SLNB utilization in women undergoing upfront mastectomy for DCIS, identify predictors of SLNB utilization, and determine the percentage with a positive SLNB.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NCDB of women with clinical DCIS who underwent upfront mastectomy between 2012 and 2017. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were compared between patients who underwent SLNB and those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with SLNB utilization and positive SLNB.

Results

About 38,973 patients met inclusion criteria: 34,231 (88%) underwent SLNB and 4742 (12%) had no surgical axillary staging. Most patients were age 50-69 (51%), non-Hispanic White (71%), with private insurance (66%). On multivariate analysis, older patients were less likely to receive SLNB (P < .01), while patients with higher grade DCIS were more likely to undergo SLNB (P < .01). In those who underwent SLNB (n = 34,231), only 1,149 (3.4%) had nodal involvement. Non-Hispanic Black patients had increased odds of a positive SLNB (P < .01), while those with estrogen receptor positive disease were less likely to be node positive (OR 0.68, P < .001).

Conclusions

While 88% of patients had a SLNB, only 3.4% were found to be node positive. Given this low rate, it is reasonable to consider SLNB omission in select patients with low grade, hormone receptor positive DCIS undergoing upfront mastectomy.

Introduction

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of ZRC-3277 (pertuzumab biosimilar) with Perjeta® (pertuzumab) in previously untreated patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods

This phase III, multicenter, double-blind study across 38 sites in India randomized (1:1) patients with HER2-positive MBC in either the ZRC-3277 or Perjeta® group. Both groups also received trastuzumab and docetaxel. Of 268 enrolled patients, mITT population had 243 patients (119 and 124 in the ZRC-3277 and Perjeta® groups, respectively). The primary objective was to compare the between-group objective response rate (ORR) after 6 cycles of treatment. ORR was determined by evaluating scans of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging following Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1). Two-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference in ORR was determined to evaluate the noninferiority of ZRC-3277 to Perjeta®. The secondary outcomes included the assessment of PK, immunogenicity, and safety between the 2 groups.

Results

In the mITT population, 104 (87.39%) and 114 (91.94%) participants achieved the ORR in the ZRC-3277 and Perjeta® groups, respectively. For predefined -15% noninferiority margin, obtained 2-sided 95% CIs (−12.19%, 3.11%) for the difference in ORR (−4.55%) between the 2 groups demonstrated the noninferiority of ZRC-3277 to Perjeta®. PK, immunogenicity, and safety were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Efficacy, PK, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of ZRC-3277 was found to be similar to those of Perjeta®.