Clinical oncology最新文献

Aims: This nationwide study provides an overview of trends and variations in radiotherapy use as part of multimodal treatment of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer in the Netherlands in 2008-2019.

Materials and methods: Women with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer were selected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatments trends were presented over time. Factors associated with (1) boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy and (2) regional radiotherapy instead of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in N+ disease were identified using multilevel logistic regression analyses.

Results: Radiotherapy use increased from 61% (2008) to 70% (2016), caused by breast-conserving therapy instead of mastectomy, increased post-mastectomy radiotherapy, and increased regional radiotherapy (32% in 2011 to 61% in 2019) instead of ALND in N+ disease. Omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in 2016-2019 (4-9%, respectively), mainly in elderly, decreased overall radiotherapy use to 67%. Radiotherapy treatment was further de-escalated by decreased boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy (66% in 2011 to 37% in 2019) and partial (1% in 2011 to 6% in 2019) instead of whole breast irradiation following BCS. Boost irradiation was associated with high-risk features: younger age (OR>75 vs <50:0.04, 95%CI:0.03-0.05), higher grade (OR grade III vs I:11.46, 95%CI:9.90-13.26) and residual disease (OR focal residual vs R0-resection:28.08, 95%CI:23.07-34.17). Variation across the country was found for both boost irradiation use (OR South vs North:0.58, 95%CI:0.49-0.68), and regional radiotherapy instead of ALND (OR Southwest vs North:0.55, 95%CI:0.37-0.80).

Conclusion: Overall radiotherapy use increased in 2008-2016, while a decreasing trend was observed after 2016, caused by post-BCS radiotherapy omission. Boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy became omitted in low-risk patients, and regional radiotherapy use increased as an alternative for ALND in N+ disease.

Aims: In the conventionally fractionated phase III FLAME prostate trial, focal boosts improved local control and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS). We explored the toxicity and effectiveness of a moderately hypofractionated schedule with focal boosts.

Material and methods: BIOPROP20 is a phase II single-arm non-randomised trial for intermediate- to very high-risk localised prostate cancer patients with bulky tumour volumes. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-choline positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans were used for staging and boost volume definition. Patients were treated with 60Gy in 20 fractions with a boost dose up to 68Gy. Five patients with positive lymph nodes on the PET-CT scan received radiotherapy to pelvic lymph nodes (45Gy to elective nodes, boosted up to 50Gy to involved nodes). Primary outcomes were acute (≤18 weeks) and late urinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, prospectively recorded up to 5 years with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4 (CTCAE). Secondary outcomes were biochemical or clinical progression, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: 61 patients completed radiotherapy with hormone therapy (range: 6-36 months). Cumulative acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity was low at 6.6% and 5.0%, respectively. Cumulative acute and late urinary toxicity was 49.2% and 30.1%, respectively; the prevalence reduced to 5.9% at 5 years. At 5 years: 6 patients had biochemical progression (bDFS: 88.5%; 95% CI: 80.2-97.6%), the MFS was 82.4% (95% CI: 73.0-92.9%), 5 patients died (OS: 91.2%; 95% CI: 84.1-98.9%), one with prostate cancer. The prostate, boost, nodal planning volumes, and the organs at risk (rectum, bowel, urethra, and bladder) met the optimal protocol dose constraints. There was a trend to increased urinary toxicity with increasing urethral (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 0.73-5.22, p = 0.18), but not bladder dose.

Conclusion: Focal boosts with a 20 fraction hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy schedule are associated with an acceptable risk of gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity and achieve good cancer control.

Clinicaltrials:

Gov identifier: NCT02125175.

Aims: To establish whether there are geographic differences in treatments and outcomes for patients with kidney cancer (KC) in England which could potentially be improved by the creation of national guidelines.

Materials and methods: A multidisciplinary group convened by the charity Kidney Cancer UK developed Quality Performance Indicators (QPIs) for the treatment of KC. Adherence to these QPIs was reported for all patients with a histological diagnosis of KC diagnosed in England between 2017 and 2018. Utilising data extracted from national datasets, logistic and linear probability models were used to estimate geographic variation in the delivery of surgery and systemic anti-cancer therapy at Cancer Alliance and NHS trust levels. Results were adjusted for a priori confounders, including age at diagnosis, area deprivation of residence, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Differences in overall survival are reported.

Results: The cohort comprised 18,640 tumours in 18,421 patients. Of tumours diagnosed, median patient age was 68 (interquartile range 58-77) years and 63.4% were in males. When stratified by Cancer Alliance, the proportions of T1a/T1b/N0/M0 KC that had radical nephrectomy (RN), nephron sparing surgery or ablation ranged from 53.3% (95% CI [48.7, 57.8]) to 80.3% (95% CI [73.0, 86.0]). For stage T1b-3 cancers, the proportion that received RN ranged from 65.6% (95% CI [60.3, 70.5]) to 77.3% (95% CI [72.1, 81.7]). Patients with M0 (n = 12,365) and M1 KC (n = 3312) at diagnosis had 24-month survival of 87.5% and 25.1%, respectively. Of patients diagnosed with M1 KC, 50.3% received systemic anti-cancer therapy, ranging from 39.7% (95% CI [33.7, 46.1]) to 70.7% (95% CI [59.6, 79.8]) between Cancer Alliances. The six-month survival of these patients was 77.4% compared to 27.6% for those that did not receive SACT.

Conclusion: These major geographical differences in surgical and systemic therapy practice have led to national guideline development.

Aims: The magnitude of upper abdominal organ motion in children may be overestimated by current planning target volumes (PTV). A four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) - derived internal target volume (ITV) is frequently used in adult radiotherapy to take respiratory-related organ motion into account. In this study, the dosimetric consequences for target coverage and organs at risk from the use of an ITV approach compared to standard PTV margins in children with high-risk neuroblastoma were investigated.

Materials and methods: 14 patients, median age 4.1 years, range 1.5 - 18.9 years, (9 midline targets, 5 lateralised) each had two dual arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (14 ×1.5 Gy) generated. One used an ITV-approach; motion information derived from 4DCT (PTV_itv) with a 5mm ITV to PTV expansion, and the other a PTV margin of 10mm from CTV to PTV (PTV_standard). Differences in absolute PTV volume and organ at risk doses are described.

Results: The ITV approach resulted in a highly significant reduction in PTV size of 38% (p<0.0001). For midline targets, an ITV approach resulted in a small but statistically significant reduction in combined mean kidney dose of 0.8Gy, p 0.01. Mean heart and lung dose were reduced by an average of 1 Gy with an ITV approach. Non-PTV integral dose from 30.4 Gy L to 27.8 Gy L using an ITV approach.

Conclusion: An ITV-approach to respiratory related organ motion management in children can significantly reduce absolute PTV volumes, maintain target coverage and reduce dose delivered to normal tissue in proximity to the target. This is an essential step to maximising the benefits of highly conformal radiotherapy techniques including VMAT for this patient group, and in the future with Proton Therapy.

Aims: There are longstanding concerns relating to clinical academic training pipelines, with evidence for multiple barriers and enablers to clinical academic career progression. We sought to assess the extent to which these and other factors apply to academic training in clinical oncology in the United Kingdom.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using a bespoke, pre-piloted online electronic questionnaire that was distributed to clinical oncology specialty trainees and consultants who had at any point between January 2013-January 2024 commenced an academic post whilst in training. Collated information included demographic data, location and stage of training, research experience and ambitions, research skill confidence and academic career progression.

Results: Seventy eligible responses were included, representing 84% (n = 16/19) of UK training deaneries. Thirty-seven (53%) of the respondents had obtained their certificate of completion of training (CCT) whilst 11% (n = 8/70) and 40% (n = 28/70) were at specialty trainee level and respectively pre- or within-/post-doctoral studies. Of 34 post-CCT respondents, 58% (n = 20) had ongoing research commitments but this reached 30% of their overall activity for just 30% (n = 10). Barriers to academic progression included clinical training requirements, post availability and limited mentorship. Most (60%; n = 35/58) undertook doctoral studies in their final two training years. A majority of respondents lacked confidence in radiation oncology (RO) skills relevant to their career ambitions, with 60%, 40% and 30%, respectively, confident in RO clinical research outcome evaluation, in vitro radiation analyses and using RO animal models.

Conclusion: These data provide a granular, long-term analysis of academic clinical oncology training at a national level; identifying poor progression to research independence underlined by limited confidence in RO research skills and multiple barriers to academic career progression. These data provide areas in which policy makers, research funders and training programmes can focus to improve academic training in clinical oncology.

The most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide is cancer of the breast. Up to 20% of familial cases are attributable to pathogenic mutations in high-penetrance (BReast CAncer gene 1 [BRCA1], BRCA2, tumor protein p53 [TP53], partner and localizer of breast cancer 2 [PALB2]) or moderate-penetrance (checkpoint kinase 2 [CHEK2], Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated [ATM], RAD51C, RAD51D) breast-cancer-predisposing genes. Most of the breast-cancer-predisposing genes are involved in DNA damage repair via homologous recombination pathways. Understanding these pathways can facilitate the development of risk-reducing and therapeutic strategies. The number of breast cancer patients undergoing testing for pathogenic mutations in these genes is rapidly increasing due to various factors. Advances in multigene panel testing have led to increased detection of pathogenic mutation carriers at high risk for developing breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer. However, the lack of long-term clinical outcome data and incomplete understanding of variants, particularly for moderate-risk genes limits clinical application. In this review, we have summarized the key functions, risks, and prognosis of breast-cancer-predisposing genes listed in the National Health Service (NHS) England National Genomic Test Directory for inherited breast cancer and provide an update on current management implications including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments, and post-treatment surveillance.

Objectives: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is the standard of care for patients with cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes and adverse effects of computed tomography (CT)-guided and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided scenarios.

Materials and methods: Data of patients with cervical cancer treated using external beam radiotherapy followed by IGABT from 2012 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. CT-guided IGABT was compared with the three modes of MRI-guided IGABT: pre-brachytherapy (MRI Pre-BT) without applicator insertion for fusion, planning MRI with applicator in-place in at least 1 fraction (MRI ≥1Fx), and MRI in every fraction (MRI EveryFx). Patient characteristics, oncologic outcomes, and late radiation toxicity were analyzed using descriptive, survival, and correlation statistics.

Results: Overall, 354 patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 60 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 61.5%, 65.2%, 54.4%, and 63.7% with CT-guided, MRI PreBT, MRI ≥1Fx, and MRI EveryFx IGABT, respectively with no significant differences (p = 0.522). The 5-year local control (LC) rates were 92.1%, 87.8%, 80.7%, and 76.5% (p = 0.133), respectively, with a significant difference observed between the CT-guided and MRI ≥1Fx (p = 0.018). The grade 3-4 late gastrointestinal toxicity rates were 6% in the CT-guided, MRI ≥1Fx, and MRI EveryFx, and 8% in MRI PreBT. The grade 3-4 late genitourinary toxicity rates were 4% in the CT-guided, 2% in MRI PreBT, 1% in MRI ≥1Fx, and none in MRI EveryFx. No significant differences were observed in the oncologic and toxicity outcomes among MRI PreBT, MRI ≥1Fx, and MRI EveryFx.

Conclusions: CT-guided IGABT yielded an acceptable 5-year OS, LC, and toxicity profile compared with all MRI scenarios and is a potentially feasible option in resource-limited settings.

Aims: The standard treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma is radical chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy which has improved survival. Hence, a major concern is our attempt to reduce the incidence of acute and late toxicities. IMRT has been shown to reduce toxicities. In this study, we have compared 3DCRT with IG-IMRT using patient-specific margins to evaluate tumor control as well as OAR-related toxicities.

Materials and methods: This was a single institution prospective phase III randomised control study including patients of squamous cell carcinoma of cervix (stage II-IIIB, FIGO 2009) without pelvic lymph node involvement. All patients were simulated using intermediate bladder filling protocol and those in the IG-IMRT arm, underwent additional scans with full and empty bladder to assess the range of internal motion and generate individualised ITV margin. EBRT dose of 46Gy/23#/4.5 weeks was delivered with weekly concurrent cisplatin followed by brachytherapy. All toxicities during EBRT and till 3 months post brachytherapy were considered acute toxicity. Post-treatment, patients were followed up every 2 months for first 2 years and then once every 6 months. Disease-related outcomes were assessed with clinical examination and symptom-directed imaging.

Results: Two hundred patients were screened for inclusion and of them, 89 patients in 3DCRT and 84 patients in IG-IMRT arms were considered for final analysis. The baseline characteristics were comparable in both arms, majority of patients in both arms having stage II disease. For OARs, all dosimetric parameters were significantly better in the IG-IMRT arm. Acute radiation induced toxicities (dermatitis, genito-urinary and gastrointestinal toxicities) were significantly less in the IG-IMRT arm. The local, pelvic, and distant control were comparable in both arms.

Conclusion: Based on our experience, the use of IG-IMRT with patient-specific ITV margins results in reduction in acute OAR toxicities in patients without compromising on tumor control.