首页 > 最新文献

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Foreword: Fetal Growth Restriction. 前言:胎儿生长限制。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000979
Hiba J Mustafa, Asma Khalil
{"title":"Foreword: Fetal Growth Restriction.","authors":"Hiba J Mustafa, Asma Khalil","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000979","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"68 4","pages":"544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Angiogenic Factors in Fetal Growth Restriction. 血管生成因子在胎儿生长限制中的作用。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000972
Helena C Bartels, Sebastian R Hobson

Fetal growth restriction complicates up to 10% of pregnancies, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers of placental function, such as PIGF or the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio, are increasingly used in clinical practice, as an adjunct to ultrasound, with an aim of improving detection of the at-risk fetus and reducing morbidity and mortality. Current evidence suggests this combined approach is associated with improved prediction and hence prevention of adverse outcomes such as stillbirth, as well as optimizing delivery timing. Future research should focus on determining thresholds for intervention, possible therapeutic targets for angiogenic markers and provide cost-based analysis. Despite limitations, there is growing evidence to suggest placental biomarkers play an important role in the prenatal management of high-risk pregnancies.

胎儿生长受限导致高达10%的妊娠并发症,导致显著的发病率和死亡率。胎盘功能的生物标志物,如PIGF或sFLT-1/PlGF比值,越来越多地用于临床实践,作为超声的辅助手段,目的是提高对高危胎儿的检测,降低发病率和死亡率。目前的证据表明,这种综合方法可以改善预测,从而预防死产等不良后果,并优化分娩时间。未来的研究应侧重于确定干预的阈值,血管生成标志物的可能治疗靶点,并提供基于成本的分析。尽管存在局限性,但越来越多的证据表明,胎盘生物标志物在高危妊娠的产前管理中发挥着重要作用。
{"title":"The Role of Angiogenic Factors in Fetal Growth Restriction.","authors":"Helena C Bartels, Sebastian R Hobson","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000972","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000972","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fetal growth restriction complicates up to 10% of pregnancies, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers of placental function, such as PIGF or the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio, are increasingly used in clinical practice, as an adjunct to ultrasound, with an aim of improving detection of the at-risk fetus and reducing morbidity and mortality. Current evidence suggests this combined approach is associated with improved prediction and hence prevention of adverse outcomes such as stillbirth, as well as optimizing delivery timing. Future research should focus on determining thresholds for intervention, possible therapeutic targets for angiogenic markers and provide cost-based analysis. Despite limitations, there is growing evidence to suggest placental biomarkers play an important role in the prenatal management of high-risk pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"545-549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intraoperative Management for Enhanced Recovery After Gynecologic Surgery. 提高妇科手术后恢复的术中管理。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000975
Gavin G Ovsak, Gabriel E Mena, Javier D Lasala

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized perioperative care, aiming to reduce surgical stress and expedite recovery. In gynecologic surgery, anesthesiologists play a pivotal role in implementing intraoperative strategies that align with ERAS principles. This manuscript delineates evidence-based intraoperative anesthetic management techniques tailored for gynecologic procedures within an ERAS framework, including multimodal analgesia, optimal fluid management, maintenance of normothermia, and lung protective ventilation (Figure 1). The integration of these strategies has demonstrated improvements in patient outcomes, including reduced hospital stays, decreased opioid consumption, and enhanced patient satisfaction.

增强术后恢复(ERAS)协议彻底改变了围手术期护理,旨在减少手术压力并加快恢复。在妇科手术中,麻醉师在实施符合ERAS原则的术中策略方面发挥着关键作用。这篇文章描述了在ERAS框架下为妇科手术量身定制的循证术中麻醉管理技术,包括多模式镇痛、最佳液体管理、体温维持和肺保护性通气(图1)。这些策略的整合已证明改善了患者的预后,包括减少住院时间、减少阿片类药物消耗和提高患者满意度。
{"title":"Intraoperative Management for Enhanced Recovery After Gynecologic Surgery.","authors":"Gavin G Ovsak, Gabriel E Mena, Javier D Lasala","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000975","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000975","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized perioperative care, aiming to reduce surgical stress and expedite recovery. In gynecologic surgery, anesthesiologists play a pivotal role in implementing intraoperative strategies that align with ERAS principles. This manuscript delineates evidence-based intraoperative anesthetic management techniques tailored for gynecologic procedures within an ERAS framework, including multimodal analgesia, optimal fluid management, maintenance of normothermia, and lung protective ventilation (Figure 1). The integration of these strategies has demonstrated improvements in patient outcomes, including reduced hospital stays, decreased opioid consumption, and enhanced patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"491-500"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145257527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors: Fetal Growth Restriction. 贡献者:胎儿生长限制。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/01.grf.0001171264.06180.2e
{"title":"Contributors: Fetal Growth Restriction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/01.grf.0001171264.06180.2e","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.grf.0001171264.06180.2e","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"68 4","pages":"vii"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twins: Updates and New Directions. 单绒毛膜双胞胎选择性胎儿生长限制:最新进展和新方向。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000977
Kelsey Pape, Asma Khalil, Hiba J Mustafa

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic twin pregnancies is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality with unique pathophysiological mechanisms and management challenges. sFGR is defined by significant intertwin discordance in estimated fetal weight and abnormal Doppler findings, employing the Gratacós classification (types I, II, and III) for risk stratification and management. Epidemiological data indicate sFGR affects 10% to 26% of monochorionic twins, with early-onset cases associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes. Surveillance strategies include frequent ultrasound and Doppler assessment, and management is tailored to sFGR type, gestational age, and fetal condition. Expectant management is favored for type I sFGR, while type II and III may require fetal intervention, including fetoscopic laser photocoagulation or selective reduction, though practice variation remains substantial. Recent meta-analyses highlight the importance of Doppler progression, gestational age at diagnosis, and ductus venosus findings as predictors of fetal demise. Advances in imaging, biomarkers, and intervention techniques are shaping future practice, but randomized trials are needed to clarify optimal strategies. Controversies persist regarding timing of intervention, ethical considerations, and outcome prediction. In conclusion, individualized, multidisciplinary management is essential, and ongoing research should focus on refining diagnostic criteria, improving neurodevelopmental outcomes, and developing evidence-based guidelines.

单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的选择性胎儿生长限制(sFGR)是围产期发病率和死亡率的主要因素,具有独特的病理生理机制和管理挑战。sFGR的定义是双胞胎间胎儿体重的显著不一致和异常多普勒结果,采用Gratacós分类(I、II和III型)进行风险分层和管理。流行病学数据表明,sFGR影响10%至26%的单绒毛膜双胞胎,早发病例与不良后果的风险最高相关。监测策略包括频繁的超声和多普勒评估,并根据sFGR类型、胎龄和胎儿状况进行管理。I型sFGR倾向于准治疗,而II型和III型可能需要胎儿干预,包括胎儿镜激光光凝或选择性复位,尽管实践差异仍然很大。最近的荟萃分析强调了多普勒进展、诊断时胎龄和静脉导管检查结果作为胎儿死亡预测因子的重要性。成像、生物标志物和干预技术的进步正在塑造未来的实践,但需要随机试验来阐明最佳策略。关于干预时机、伦理考虑和结果预测的争议持续存在。总之,个性化的、多学科的管理是必要的,正在进行的研究应该集中在完善诊断标准、改善神经发育结果和制定循证指南上。
{"title":"Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twins: Updates and New Directions.","authors":"Kelsey Pape, Asma Khalil, Hiba J Mustafa","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000977","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic twin pregnancies is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality with unique pathophysiological mechanisms and management challenges. sFGR is defined by significant intertwin discordance in estimated fetal weight and abnormal Doppler findings, employing the Gratacós classification (types I, II, and III) for risk stratification and management. Epidemiological data indicate sFGR affects 10% to 26% of monochorionic twins, with early-onset cases associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes. Surveillance strategies include frequent ultrasound and Doppler assessment, and management is tailored to sFGR type, gestational age, and fetal condition. Expectant management is favored for type I sFGR, while type II and III may require fetal intervention, including fetoscopic laser photocoagulation or selective reduction, though practice variation remains substantial. Recent meta-analyses highlight the importance of Doppler progression, gestational age at diagnosis, and ductus venosus findings as predictors of fetal demise. Advances in imaging, biomarkers, and intervention techniques are shaping future practice, but randomized trials are needed to clarify optimal strategies. Controversies persist regarding timing of intervention, ethical considerations, and outcome prediction. In conclusion, individualized, multidisciplinary management is essential, and ongoing research should focus on refining diagnostic criteria, improving neurodevelopmental outcomes, and developing evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"565-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145257540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Evolution of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecology: An Introduction. 妇科手术后增强恢复(ERAS)的发展:介绍。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000964
Kevin M Elias

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) represents a paradigm shift in perioperative care, emphasizing evidence-based, multimodal strategies to minimize surgical stress and accelerate recovery. Originating in colorectal surgery in the 1990s, ERAS principles have since permeated gynecologic practice, transforming care across benign, oncologic, and urogynecologic procedures. Subspecialty adaptations, including those for minimally invasive surgery, pediatric gynecology, and pelvic floor reconstruction, illustrate the flexibility of ERAS across clinical contexts. By embracing data-driven implementation and interdisciplinary collaboration, ERAS continues to redefine perioperative care in gynecology, delivering measurable improvements in patient recovery and surgical value.

加强术后恢复(ERAS)代表了围手术期护理的范式转变,强调以证据为基础的多模式策略,以最大限度地减少手术压力并加速恢复。ERAS原则起源于20世纪90年代的结直肠手术,此后已渗透到妇科实践中,改变了良性,肿瘤和泌尿妇科手术的护理。亚专科适应,包括微创外科、儿科妇科和盆底重建,说明了ERAS在临床背景下的灵活性。通过采用数据驱动的实施和跨学科合作,ERAS继续重新定义妇科围手术期护理,在患者康复和手术价值方面提供可衡量的改善。
{"title":"The Evolution of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecology: An Introduction.","authors":"Kevin M Elias","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000964","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000964","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) represents a paradigm shift in perioperative care, emphasizing evidence-based, multimodal strategies to minimize surgical stress and accelerate recovery. Originating in colorectal surgery in the 1990s, ERAS principles have since permeated gynecologic practice, transforming care across benign, oncologic, and urogynecologic procedures. Subspecialty adaptations, including those for minimally invasive surgery, pediatric gynecology, and pelvic floor reconstruction, illustrate the flexibility of ERAS across clinical contexts. By embracing data-driven implementation and interdisciplinary collaboration, ERAS continues to redefine perioperative care in gynecology, delivering measurable improvements in patient recovery and surgical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"473-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145130107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors: Enhanced Recovery in Gynecologic Surgery. 作者:提高妇科手术的恢复。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/01.grf.0001171260.53596.df
{"title":"Contributors: Enhanced Recovery in Gynecologic Surgery.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/01.grf.0001171260.53596.df","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.grf.0001171260.53596.df","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"68 4","pages":"v-vi"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways in Gynecologic Surgery. 妇科手术后增强恢复途径。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000976
Jenna M Patterson, Madeline Freeman, Lisa C Hickman

Surgical stress affects the physiology of nearly every organ system. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols counter these stressors to maintain normal physiology and promote postoperative recovery. In gynecologic surgery, ERAS pathways are associated with many postoperative benefits, including shorter length of stay, decreased pain, faster return of bowel function and both lower complication and readmission rates. This review highlights the current evidence and recommendations regarding postoperative ERAS pathways in gynecologic surgery.

手术压力影响几乎每个器官系统的生理机能。增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案对抗这些应激源,以维持正常生理和促进术后恢复。在妇科手术中,ERAS通路与许多术后益处相关,包括更短的住院时间、减轻疼痛、更快的肠功能恢复以及更低的并发症和再入院率。这篇综述强调了目前关于妇科手术术后ERAS通路的证据和建议。
{"title":"Postoperative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways in Gynecologic Surgery.","authors":"Jenna M Patterson, Madeline Freeman, Lisa C Hickman","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000976","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000976","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical stress affects the physiology of nearly every organ system. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols counter these stressors to maintain normal physiology and promote postoperative recovery. In gynecologic surgery, ERAS pathways are associated with many postoperative benefits, including shorter length of stay, decreased pain, faster return of bowel function and both lower complication and readmission rates. This review highlights the current evidence and recommendations regarding postoperative ERAS pathways in gynecologic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"501-507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145257561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fetal Growth Assessment in Twin Pregnancies: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Singleton Versus Twin-Specific Growth Charts. 双胎妊娠的胎儿生长评估:单胎与双胎特异性生长图的循证评价。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000973
Eileen Deuster, Hiba J Mustafa, Eileen M O'Conner McFerran, Asma Khalil

The epidemiology of twin pregnancies has shifted considerably over recent decades. Since 1980, the twin birth rate in the United States has increased by 76%, largely driven by the widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). This demographic change has reshaped clinical perspectives and evidence on the natural history of twin gestations, underscoring their unique risks and management needs. Twin pregnancies remain associated with a markedly higher risk of adverse outcomes compared with singletons. The perinatal mortality rate is estimated at 16.0 to 17.3 per 1000 births, with fetal growth restriction representing a major contributor. Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) complicates up to 10% of dichorionic and 15% of monochorionic twin pregnancies, respectively. Accurate and timely growth assessment is therefore central to surveillance strategies and clinical decision-making in these pregnancies. However, assessing growth in twins presents distinctive challenges. Physiological differences from singletons render singleton-based standards inadequate, often leading to over- or underdiagnosis of pathology. Evidence supports the use of twin-specific growth charts, particularly those stratified by chorionicity, which may improve prognostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary intervention. Additional considerations include intertwin discordance, sFGR, and evolving staging systems such as the Gratacós and modified classifications. The purpose of this review is to critically examine current approaches to fetal growth assessment in twin pregnancies. We summarize the limitations of applying singleton standards, evaluate the evidence supporting twin-specific references, and explore how chorionicity, longitudinal assessment, and Doppler studies can refine diagnosis and management. Finally, we highlight ongoing controversies, international variation in practice, and the need for further validation of diagnostic thresholds.

近几十年来,双胎妊娠的流行病学发生了很大的变化。自1980年以来,美国的双胞胎出生率增加了76%,主要是由于辅助生殖技术(ART)的广泛使用。这一人口变化重塑了双胎妊娠自然史的临床观点和证据,强调了其独特的风险和管理需求。与单胎妊娠相比,双胎妊娠的不良后果风险明显更高。围产期死亡率估计为16.0至17.3‰,胎儿生长受限是一个主要原因。选择性胎儿生长受限(sFGR)并发症发生率分别高达10%的双绒毛膜和15%的单绒毛膜双胎妊娠。因此,准确和及时的生长评估对这些妊娠的监测策略和临床决策至关重要。然而,评估双胞胎的成长面临着独特的挑战。与单纯性的生理差异使得单纯性的标准不充分,常常导致病理诊断过度或不足。有证据支持使用双特异性生长图,特别是按时间顺序分层的生长图,这可能提高预后准确性并减少不必要的干预。其他考虑因素包括双生子间不一致、sFGR和不断发展的分期系统,如Gratacós和修改的分类。本综述的目的是严格审查目前的方法胎儿生长评估双胎妊娠。我们总结了应用单例标准的局限性,评估了支持双特异性参考文献的证据,并探讨了时序性、纵向评估和多普勒研究如何改进诊断和管理。最后,我们强调了持续的争议,实践中的国际差异,以及进一步验证诊断阈值的必要性。
{"title":"Fetal Growth Assessment in Twin Pregnancies: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Singleton Versus Twin-Specific Growth Charts.","authors":"Eileen Deuster, Hiba J Mustafa, Eileen M O'Conner McFerran, Asma Khalil","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000973","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The epidemiology of twin pregnancies has shifted considerably over recent decades. Since 1980, the twin birth rate in the United States has increased by 76%, largely driven by the widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). This demographic change has reshaped clinical perspectives and evidence on the natural history of twin gestations, underscoring their unique risks and management needs. Twin pregnancies remain associated with a markedly higher risk of adverse outcomes compared with singletons. The perinatal mortality rate is estimated at 16.0 to 17.3 per 1000 births, with fetal growth restriction representing a major contributor. Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) complicates up to 10% of dichorionic and 15% of monochorionic twin pregnancies, respectively. Accurate and timely growth assessment is therefore central to surveillance strategies and clinical decision-making in these pregnancies. However, assessing growth in twins presents distinctive challenges. Physiological differences from singletons render singleton-based standards inadequate, often leading to over- or underdiagnosis of pathology. Evidence supports the use of twin-specific growth charts, particularly those stratified by chorionicity, which may improve prognostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary intervention. Additional considerations include intertwin discordance, sFGR, and evolving staging systems such as the Gratacós and modified classifications. The purpose of this review is to critically examine current approaches to fetal growth assessment in twin pregnancies. We summarize the limitations of applying singleton standards, evaluate the evidence supporting twin-specific references, and explore how chorionicity, longitudinal assessment, and Doppler studies can refine diagnosis and management. Finally, we highlight ongoing controversies, international variation in practice, and the need for further validation of diagnostic thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"558-564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145225008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting Perinatal Morbidity in Fetal Growth Restriction: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities. 预测胎儿生长受限的围产期发病率:证据、挑战和机遇。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000974
Sara E Post, Nathan R Blue

Risk stratification is a core challenge in fetal growth restriction (FGR) care, in part because FGR does not represent a single diagnosis but instead is a finding that is associated with morbidity. Considerable effort has been invested in the development and study of methods to identify fetuses at risk of morbidity and who warrant intervention across multiple domains: Doppler ultrasound, maternal biomarkers, multivariable modeling, and artificial intelligence. It is likely that the most promising advances will integrate findings from across these domains, but further investigation remains necessary.

风险分层是胎儿生长受限(FGR)护理的核心挑战,部分原因是FGR不代表单一诊断,而是与发病率相关的一项发现。在多普勒超声、母体生物标志物、多变量建模和人工智能等多个领域,已经投入了大量的精力来开发和研究识别有发病风险的胎儿和需要干预的方法。最有希望的进展可能是整合这些领域的发现,但仍有必要进一步调查。
{"title":"Predicting Perinatal Morbidity in Fetal Growth Restriction: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities.","authors":"Sara E Post, Nathan R Blue","doi":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000974","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GRF.0000000000000974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk stratification is a core challenge in fetal growth restriction (FGR) care, in part because FGR does not represent a single diagnosis but instead is a finding that is associated with morbidity. Considerable effort has been invested in the development and study of methods to identify fetuses at risk of morbidity and who warrant intervention across multiple domains: Doppler ultrasound, maternal biomarkers, multivariable modeling, and artificial intelligence. It is likely that the most promising advances will integrate findings from across these domains, but further investigation remains necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":10415,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"571-578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1