Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2401598
Perry E Rosen, Christine Ramdin, James Leonard, Bruce E Ruck, Lewis S Nelson, Diane P Calello
Introduction: The objective of this study was to update and expand on previous studies of opioid exposures among young children reported to America's Poison Centers®, and to describe how fentanyl and medications for opioid use disorder have contributed.
Methods: This retrospective study investigated 34,632 reports of single-substance opioid exposure from 2016 to 2023 involving pediatric patients aged one month to six years old. Descriptive statistics, tests for data normality, and significance testing were performed where applicable.
Results: Of 34,632 reported exposures, 96.7% were unintentional. The median age of exposure was 2.0 years (IQR 1.33-3.0 years). Reported exposures decreased by 57.5% over the study period (r = -0.96; P <0.001). However, there was a 300% absolute increase in deaths and major effects (r = 0.96; P <0.001). Exposures resulting in minor, no effect, not followed, or unable to follow decreased 66.2% (r = -0.99; P <0.001). Buprenorphine was most frequently involved, comprising 23.4% of reported exposures. Buprenorphine (OR 1.93; P <0.001) and methadone (OR 14.98; P <0.001) were associated with an increased risk of severe effects when compared to other prescription drugs (OR: 1). There was an absolute increase of 512% over time in reports of heroin, fentanyl, synthetic non-pharmaceutical opioids (r = 0.92; P <0.001), which were also associated with severe effects (OR 20.1; P <0.001).
Discussion: Pediatric opioid exposures have previously been reported to be relatively stable. It is likely the 57.5% reduction is exaggerated due to underreporting from health care providers. However, decreases in exposures are presumed to be balanced throughout the dataset and, therefore, without differential impact on other points of analysis. Our study highlights the continued need for enhanced poisoning prevention strategies.
Conclusions: The relative severity of poisonings reported to poison centers worsened over the study period. The opioids implicated have shifted away from hydrocodone, oxycodone, and tramadol, and towards fentanyl and buprenorphine.
简介:本研究旨在更新和扩展之前向美国毒物中心报告的幼儿阿片类药物暴露的研究,并描述芬太尼和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物是如何产生影响的:这项回顾性研究调查了 2016 年至 2023 年间 34,632 份涉及一个月至六岁儿童患者的单一物质阿片类药物暴露报告。在适当情况下进行了描述性统计、数据正态性检验和显著性检验:在报告的 34,632 次暴露中,96.7% 为无意暴露。暴露年龄的中位数为 2.0 岁(IQR 为 1.33-3.0 岁)。在研究期间,报告的暴露量减少了 57.5%(r = -0.96;P r = 0.96;P r = -0.99;P P P r = 0.92;P P P 讨论:之前有报告称,小儿阿片类药物暴露量相对稳定。57.5%的降幅很可能被夸大了,因为医疗服务提供者少报了数据。不过,据推测,暴露量的减少在整个数据集中是平衡的,因此不会对其他分析点产生不同的影响。我们的研究强调了加强中毒预防策略的持续必要性:结论:在研究期间,向中毒中心报告的中毒事件的相对严重程度有所恶化。涉及的阿片类药物已从氢可酮、羟考酮和曲马多转向芬太尼和丁丙诺啡。
{"title":"Trends in opioid exposures among young children reported to United States poison centers from 2016 to 2023.","authors":"Perry E Rosen, Christine Ramdin, James Leonard, Bruce E Ruck, Lewis S Nelson, Diane P Calello","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2401598","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2401598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to update and expand on previous studies of opioid exposures among young children reported to America's Poison Centers®, and to describe how fentanyl and medications for opioid use disorder have contributed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study investigated 34,632 reports of single-substance opioid exposure from 2016 to 2023 involving pediatric patients aged one month to six years old. Descriptive statistics, tests for data normality, and significance testing were performed where applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 34,632 reported exposures, 96.7% were unintentional. The median age of exposure was 2.0 years (IQR 1.33-3.0 years). Reported exposures decreased by 57.5% over the study period (<i>r</i> = -0.96; <i>P</i> <0.001). However, there was a 300% absolute increase in deaths and major effects (<i>r</i> = 0.96; <i>P</i> <0.001). Exposures resulting in minor, no effect, not followed, or unable to follow decreased 66.2% (<i>r</i> = -0.99; <i>P</i> <0.001). Buprenorphine was most frequently involved, comprising 23.4% of reported exposures. Buprenorphine (OR 1.93; <i>P</i> <0.001) and methadone (OR 14.98; <i>P</i> <0.001) were associated with an increased risk of severe effects when compared to other prescription drugs (OR: 1). There was an absolute increase of 512% over time in reports of heroin, fentanyl, synthetic non-pharmaceutical opioids (<i>r</i> = 0.92; <i>P</i> <0.001), which were also associated with severe effects (OR 20.1; <i>P</i> <0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pediatric opioid exposures have previously been reported to be relatively stable. It is likely the 57.5% reduction is exaggerated due to underreporting from health care providers. However, decreases in exposures are presumed to be balanced throughout the dataset and, therefore, without differential impact on other points of analysis. Our study highlights the continued need for enhanced poisoning prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relative severity of poisonings reported to poison centers worsened over the study period. The opioids implicated have shifted away from hydrocodone, oxycodone, and tramadol, and towards fentanyl and buprenorphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"762-769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2402070
Caitlin E Wolfe, Ashley Rowe, Simon Hudson, John Rh Archer, Paul I Dargan, David M Wood
Introduction: Clinicians managing patients with acute recreational drug or new psychoactive substance toxicity typically depend on self-reported drug(s) used. This study compares patient self-report (and/or from other sources) to the substance(s) that were subsequently identified in serum.
Methods: A prospective sample of 1,000 adults presenting to a tertiary care, urban emergency department in London, United Kingdom, with acute recreational drug/new psychoactive substance toxicity was collected from 1 February 2019 to 2 February 2020. A total of 939 appropriate samples underwent qualitative analysis by high-resolution mass spectrometry with comparison to a database of drugs/metabolites. Data on the stated drug(s) used were extracted from the routine medical chart/records; results were batched by drug class, when appropriate, and analysis was performed using R software.
Results: Seven hundred and ninety-nine (85.1%) patients were male with a median (IQR) age of 34 years (27 to 42 years). Six hundred and thirty-five (67.6%) patients reported using two or more drugs. The median (IQR) positive predictive value of a self-report substance having been taken was 0.68 (IQR: 0.44-0.86); conversely, the median negative predictive value of a substance having not been taken was 0.90 (IQR: 0.53-0.95). There was variability in the accuracy of reporting. For example, self-reported opioid use had a 90.5% likelihood that opioids were detected on analysis, whereas hallucinogens were only detected in 18.8% of samples when use was reported. Individuals were also mostly accurate in not underreporting substances. For example, those not explicitly reporting gamma-hydroxybutyrate use were 97.5% truly negative.
Discussion: Overall, most users were relatively accurate in their self-report of what class of drugs they had used, although there was variability in this accuracy. However, other drugs were present even when not reported, for example, opioids with disproportionate detection of prescription and over-the-counter (non-prescription) opioids that were unreported.
Conclusions: Self-report (and/or collateral reports) had overall relatively high concordance with the likelihood that a substance was, or was not, recently used. Therefore, clinicians can make initial treatment decisions based on the self-reported drug(s) used in most cases.
{"title":"Reported recreational drug and new psychoactive substance use versus laboratory detection of substances by high-resolution mass spectrometry in patients presenting to an emergency department in London with acute drug toxicity.","authors":"Caitlin E Wolfe, Ashley Rowe, Simon Hudson, John Rh Archer, Paul I Dargan, David M Wood","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2402070","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2402070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinicians managing patients with acute recreational drug or new psychoactive substance toxicity typically depend on self-reported drug(s) used. This study compares patient self-report (and/or from other sources) to the substance(s) that were subsequently identified in serum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective sample of 1,000 adults presenting to a tertiary care, urban emergency department in London, United Kingdom, with acute recreational drug/new psychoactive substance toxicity was collected from 1 February 2019 to 2 February 2020. A total of 939 appropriate samples underwent qualitative analysis by high-resolution mass spectrometry with comparison to a database of drugs/metabolites. Data on the stated drug(s) used were extracted from the routine medical chart/records; results were batched by drug class, when appropriate, and analysis was performed using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and ninety-nine (85.1%) patients were male with a median (IQR) age of 34 years (27 to 42 years). Six hundred and thirty-five (67.6%) patients reported using two or more drugs. The median (IQR) positive predictive value of a self-report substance having been taken was 0.68 (IQR: 0.44-0.86); conversely, the median negative predictive value of a substance having not been taken was 0.90 (IQR: 0.53-0.95). There was variability in the accuracy of reporting. For example, self-reported opioid use had a 90.5% likelihood that opioids were detected on analysis, whereas hallucinogens were only detected in 18.8% of samples when use was reported. Individuals were also mostly accurate in not underreporting substances. For example, those not explicitly reporting gamma-hydroxybutyrate use were 97.5% truly negative.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, most users were relatively accurate in their self-report of what class of drugs they had used, although there was variability in this accuracy. However, other drugs were present even when not reported, for example, opioids with disproportionate detection of prescription and over-the-counter (non-prescription) opioids that were unreported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-report (and/or collateral reports) had overall relatively high concordance with the likelihood that a substance was, or was not, recently used. Therefore, clinicians can make initial treatment decisions based on the self-reported drug(s) used in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"693-697"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2401076
Marc Ghannoum, Paula J Waters, Knut Erik Hovda, Gabrielle Choquette, Katja Benedikte Prestø Elgstøen, Ilah Nygaard, Helge Rootwelt, Dean Hickey, Mazyar Yazdani, Danielle K Bourque
Introduction: To the best of our knowledge, clinically significant endogenous ethylene glycol production has never been reported in humans, very seldom reported in other animals or microorganisms, and then only under rare and specific conditions. We describe the detailed investigations we undertook in two adult monozygotic twin sisters to ascertain whether they were producing endogenous ethylene glycol.
Methods: Two previously healthy monozygotic adult twin sisters presented with recurrent episodes of apparent ethylene glycol poisoning beginning at age 35, requiring chronic hemodialysis to remove ethylene glycol and its metabolites as well as to restore metabolic homeostasis. The sisters denied ingestion or exposure to ethylene glycol. At their request, they were admitted to hospital under strict supervision to exclude surreptitious ingestion of ethylene glycol and to evaluate the need for treatment. Hemodialysis was withheld during this prospective study. Twin A was admitted for 14 days and twin B for 11 days. Serial biochemical analyses were performed in blood and urine. Clinical exome sequencing and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing were also completed.
Results: In both twins, ethylene glycol was detected in urine, along with intermittent increases in concentrations of lactate, glycolate, and glycine in blood and/or urine. Blood ethylene glycol concentrations, however, remained <62 mg/L (<1 mmol/L) but became positive soon after discharge. The oxalate concentration remained normal in blood and urine. Plasma and urine amino acid profiles showed intermittent small increases in glycine, serine, taurine, proline, and/or alanine concentrations. Exome sequencing and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing were non-diagnostic. Neither twin has been admitted with metabolic acidosis nor ethylene glycol poisoning since chronic hemodialysis was started. Twin A developed a calcium oxalate dihydrate lithiasis.
Discussion: Mitochondrial disease, methylmalonic/propionic/isovaleric aciduria, primary hyperoxaluria, and analyte error were all excluded in these twins, as were obvious common environmental exposures.
Conclusion: Detailed investigations were performed in adult monozygotic twin sisters to ascertain whether they were producing endogenous ethylene glycol. Alternative explanations were excluded to the very best of our efforts and knowledge. Global metabolomics, gut microbiome analyses, and whole genome sequencing are pending.
导言:据我们所知,临床上从未报道过人类会产生明显的内源性乙二醇,在其他动物或微生物中也鲜有报道,而且都是在罕见的特定条件下。我们描述了对两对成年单卵双胞胎姐妹进行的详细调查,以确定她们是否产生了内源性乙二醇:两对先前健康的单卵成年双胞胎姐妹从 35 岁开始反复出现明显的乙二醇中毒症状,需要进行慢性血液透析来清除乙二醇及其代谢物并恢复代谢平衡。姐妹俩否认摄入或接触过乙二醇。在她们的要求下,医院对她们进行了严格的监护,以排除偷偷摄入乙二醇的可能性,并评估治疗的必要性。在这项前瞻性研究期间,暂不进行血液透析。双胞胎 A 住院 14 天,双胞胎 B 住院 11 天。对血液和尿液进行了连续的生化分析。此外,还完成了临床外显子组测序和线粒体脱氧核糖核酸测序:结果:两对双胞胎的尿液中均检测到乙二醇,同时血液和/或尿液中的乳酸、乙醇酸和甘氨酸浓度间歇性增加。然而,血液中的乙二醇浓度仍处于讨论阶段:这对双胞胎均排除了线粒体疾病、甲基丙二酸/丙酸/异戊酸尿症、原发性高草酸尿症和分析误差,也排除了明显的常见环境暴露:对这对成年单卵双胞胎姐妹进行了详细调查,以确定她们是否产生了内源性乙二醇。我们尽最大努力和所知排除了其他解释。全球代谢组学、肠道微生物组分析和全基因组测序尚未完成。
{"title":"Can endogenous ethylene glycol production occur in humans? A detailed investigation of adult monozygotic twin sisters.","authors":"Marc Ghannoum, Paula J Waters, Knut Erik Hovda, Gabrielle Choquette, Katja Benedikte Prestø Elgstøen, Ilah Nygaard, Helge Rootwelt, Dean Hickey, Mazyar Yazdani, Danielle K Bourque","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2401076","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2401076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, clinically significant endogenous ethylene glycol production has never been reported in humans, very seldom reported in other animals or microorganisms, and then only under rare and specific conditions. We describe the detailed investigations we undertook in two adult monozygotic twin sisters to ascertain whether they were producing endogenous ethylene glycol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two previously healthy monozygotic adult twin sisters presented with recurrent episodes of apparent ethylene glycol poisoning beginning at age 35, requiring chronic hemodialysis to remove ethylene glycol and its metabolites as well as to restore metabolic homeostasis. The sisters denied ingestion or exposure to ethylene glycol. At their request, they were admitted to hospital under strict supervision to exclude surreptitious ingestion of ethylene glycol and to evaluate the need for treatment. Hemodialysis was withheld during this prospective study. Twin A was admitted for 14 days and twin B for 11 days. Serial biochemical analyses were performed in blood and urine. Clinical exome sequencing and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing were also completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both twins, ethylene glycol was detected in urine, along with intermittent increases in concentrations of lactate, glycolate, and glycine in blood and/or urine. Blood ethylene glycol concentrations, however, remained <62 mg/L (<1 mmol/L) but became positive soon after discharge. The oxalate concentration remained normal in blood and urine. Plasma and urine amino acid profiles showed intermittent small increases in glycine, serine, taurine, proline, and/or alanine concentrations. Exome sequencing and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing were non-diagnostic. Neither twin has been admitted with metabolic acidosis nor ethylene glycol poisoning since chronic hemodialysis was started. Twin A developed a calcium oxalate dihydrate lithiasis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mitochondrial disease, methylmalonic/propionic/isovaleric aciduria, primary hyperoxaluria, and analyte error were all excluded in these twins, as were obvious common environmental exposures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Detailed investigations were performed in adult monozygotic twin sisters to ascertain whether they were producing endogenous ethylene glycol. Alternative explanations were excluded to the very best of our efforts and knowledge. Global metabolomics, gut microbiome analyses, and whole genome sequencing are pending.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"698-706"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2411323
Darren M Roberts, Thanjira Jiranantakan, Catherine McDonald, Una Cullinan, Jared Brown
{"title":"Increased prevalence of pentylone and dipentylone in combination with other drugs in New South Wales, Australia.","authors":"Darren M Roberts, Thanjira Jiranantakan, Catherine McDonald, Una Cullinan, Jared Brown","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2411323","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2411323","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"781-782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2407059
Erwin Schieveen, Femke M J Gresnigt, Chantal den Haan
Introduction: Hydroxychloroquine has cardiac and cerebral sodium channel- and human ether-à-go-go-related gene (HERG) potassium channel-blocking effects. This causes depolarization delays, resulting in cardiovascular toxicity with potentially fatal consequences. Despite several supportive care options, hydroxychloroquine poisoning remains difficult to treat. Its high lipid solubility suggests that lipid emulsion therapy might be beneficial; however, no clear evidence regarding its efficacy is available. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence, the outcomes, and adverse events regarding the use of intravascular lipid emulsion therapy as a treatment for hydroxychloroquine poisoning.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)/Wiley, Web of Science Core Collection/Clarivate Analytics, and Scopus/Scopus.com from inception until 1 November 2023. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria encompassed original observational or interventional studies, case series and case reports describing patients receiving lipid emulsion therapy for hydroxychloroquine toxicity. We extracted clinical data and performed a quality assessment of the included cases. We present the results as a narrative synthesis.
Results: Of 157 identified articles, 16 case reports met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 18 patients. Lipid emulsion therapy was always associated with additional treatments, and detailed information on the circumstances regarding the administration of intravenous lipid emulsion and its presumed effect was often lacking. Fifteen of 18 patients survived to hospital discharge. Some reports described clear and almost immediate clinical improvement after intravenous lipid emulsion administration. No clear adverse effects were reported.
Discussion: A limitation is the reliance on case reports, which varied in the degree of reported details. The administration of multiple therapeutic drugs in most cases made it difficult to attribute survival primarily to lipid emulsion. Publication bias may favour cases with successful outcomes.
Conclusion: Among published case reports, most patients who received lipid emulsion for treatment of hydroxychloroquine poisoning survived. The risk of bias, the small number of reports, and the lack of systematic reporting of both favourable and adverse effects limit any conclusions about the effectiveness of lipid emulsion for hydroxychloroquine poisoning.
简介羟氯喹具有阻断心、脑钠通道和人类醚-γ-go-go 相关基因(HERG)钾通道的作用。这会造成去极化延迟,导致心血管中毒,并可能造成致命后果。尽管有多种支持性治疗方案,但羟氯喹中毒仍然难以治疗。羟氯喹的高脂溶性表明脂质乳剂疗法可能是有益的,但目前还没有关于其疗效的明确证据。本综述旨在评估使用血管内脂质乳剂疗法治疗羟氯喹中毒的证据、结果和不良事件:我们在 PubMed、Embase.com、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)/Wiley、Web of Science Core Collection/Clarivate Analytics 和 Scopus/Scopus.com 中进行了系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 11 月 1 日。我们遵守系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。纳入标准包括描述接受脂质乳剂治疗羟氯喹毒性患者的原始观察性或干预性研究、病例系列和病例报告。我们提取了临床数据,并对纳入的病例进行了质量评估。我们以叙述性综述的形式呈现研究结果:在157篇已确定的文章中,16篇病例报告符合纳入标准,报告了18名患者。脂质乳剂治疗总是伴随着额外的治疗,而且往往缺乏有关静脉注射脂质乳剂的详细情况及其假定效果的信息。18 名患者中有 15 人存活到出院。一些报告称,静脉注射脂质乳剂后,临床症状明显改善,几乎立竿见影。讨论:讨论:病例报告的局限性在于,报告的详细程度各不相同。大多数病例都使用了多种治疗药物,因此很难将存活主要归因于脂质乳剂。结论:在已发表的病例报告中,大多数成功存活的患者都是由脂质乳剂引起的:在已发表的病例报告中,大多数接受脂质乳剂治疗羟氯喹中毒的患者都存活了下来。由于存在偏倚风险、报告数量较少以及缺乏对有利和不利影响的系统报告,因此无法就脂质乳剂治疗羟氯喹中毒的有效性得出结论。
{"title":"The use of lipid emulsion therapy in severe hydroxychloroquine overdose - a narrative review of case reports.","authors":"Erwin Schieveen, Femke M J Gresnigt, Chantal den Haan","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2407059","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2407059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hydroxychloroquine has cardiac and cerebral sodium channel- and human ether-à-go-go-related gene (HERG) potassium channel-blocking effects. This causes depolarization delays, resulting in cardiovascular toxicity with potentially fatal consequences. Despite several supportive care options, hydroxychloroquine poisoning remains difficult to treat. Its high lipid solubility suggests that lipid emulsion therapy might be beneficial; however, no clear evidence regarding its efficacy is available. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence, the outcomes, and adverse events regarding the use of intravascular lipid emulsion therapy as a treatment for hydroxychloroquine poisoning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)/Wiley, Web of Science Core Collection/Clarivate Analytics, and Scopus/Scopus.com from inception until 1 November 2023. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria encompassed original observational or interventional studies, case series and case reports describing patients receiving lipid emulsion therapy for hydroxychloroquine toxicity. We extracted clinical data and performed a quality assessment of the included cases. We present the results as a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 157 identified articles, 16 case reports met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 18 patients. Lipid emulsion therapy was always associated with additional treatments, and detailed information on the circumstances regarding the administration of intravenous lipid emulsion and its presumed effect was often lacking. Fifteen of 18 patients survived to hospital discharge. Some reports described clear and almost immediate clinical improvement after intravenous lipid emulsion administration. No clear adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A limitation is the reliance on case reports, which varied in the degree of reported details. The administration of multiple therapeutic drugs in most cases made it difficult to attribute survival primarily to lipid emulsion. Publication bias may favour cases with successful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among published case reports, most patients who received lipid emulsion for treatment of hydroxychloroquine poisoning survived. The risk of bias, the small number of reports, and the lack of systematic reporting of both favourable and adverse effects limit any conclusions about the effectiveness of lipid emulsion for hydroxychloroquine poisoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"677-685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2401088
Esha Chebolu, Marlis Gnirke, Hannah St Francis, Samara Soghoian, Mark K Su
Introduction: Methylthioninium chloride is used for multiple treatment purposes and is sometimes administered through peripheral intravenous lines. We highlight the potential adverse effects of methylthioninium chloride extravasation during continuous peripheral intravenous administration.
Case summary: A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with multifactorial hypovolemic and septic shock. She was treated with a continuous peripheral infusion of intravenous methylthioninium chloride for shock refractory to multiple vasopressors.
Images: One day after administration commenced, the patient developed blue staining of the left upper arm due to extravasation of methylthioninium chloride proximal to the site of infusion. Further images show its later spread.
Conclusion: While reported cases of methylthioninium chloride extravasation are rare, it is our preference that methylthioninium chloride should be administered through a central line in cases of continuous infusion due to the risk of potential toxicity from extravasation.
{"title":"Extravasation with methylthioninium chloride.","authors":"Esha Chebolu, Marlis Gnirke, Hannah St Francis, Samara Soghoian, Mark K Su","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2401088","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2401088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methylthioninium chloride is used for multiple treatment purposes and is sometimes administered through peripheral intravenous lines. We highlight the potential adverse effects of methylthioninium chloride extravasation during continuous peripheral intravenous administration.</p><p><strong>Case summary: </strong>A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with multifactorial hypovolemic and septic shock. She was treated with a continuous peripheral infusion of intravenous methylthioninium chloride for shock refractory to multiple vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Images: </strong>One day after administration commenced, the patient developed blue staining of the left upper arm due to extravasation of methylthioninium chloride proximal to the site of infusion. Further images show its later spread.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While reported cases of methylthioninium chloride extravasation are rare, it is our preference that methylthioninium chloride should be administered through a central line in cases of continuous infusion due to the risk of potential toxicity from extravasation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"776-778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142281414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-11-22DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2418388
Isabelle Claudet, Hugo Germain
Introduction: The VipGrade® is a French electronic clinical tool that was created in 2022 to help frontline clinicians grade envenomations due to European Vipera spp. and decide whether to use specific immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to test VipGrade® on a paediatric retrospective cohort (2001-2022) of cases of Vipera spp. envenomation and evaluate the concordance with the initial grading assigned by clinicians on admission.
Methods: For each child in the cohort (n = 116), VipGrade® was applied by a single physician unaware of the initial clinical grading. We compared VipGrade® results with those obtained at the time of admission using the Audebert-Boels classification system.
Results: The proportion of discrepancies represented 26% of initial grade I (n = 39) cases, meaning that 10 children were upgraded to grade IIa (n = 9) or IIb (n = 1). The main reason was the VipGrade® cut-off for oedema size (4 cm) to distinguish grade I from grade II, while oedema evaluation using the Audebert-Boels clinical classification differs in this regard. The global correlation κ score was equal to 0.78; 0.71 with the exception of grades 0 (which is not usually a diagnostic issue); 0.64 considering both results for young children (age <6 years, n = 51) and 0.79 for older ones.
Discussion: Upgrading cases inappropriately could have a major impact on treatment and the use of the antivenom. Even if specific immunotherapy with Viperfav® (MicroPharm Ltd, Newcastle Emlyn, Carmarthenshire, SA38 9BY, United Kingdom) is safe, its use when inappropriate cannot be justified, particularly in times of supply shortage, as we have experienced over the last 10 years.
Conclusion: The current version of the VipGrade® electronic clinical tool produces a different distribution of envenomation grades, notably in grade I by overgrading a substantial number of cases. We suggest creating a paediatric version that incorporates the same oedema evaluation method as the Audebert-Boels clinical classification but also includes a more refined definition of "local or regional" oedema.
{"title":"VipGrade<sup>®</sup> electronic clinical tool: retrospective evaluation on a paediatric cohort of European viper bites.","authors":"Isabelle Claudet, Hugo Germain","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2418388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2418388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The VipGrade<sup>®</sup> is a French electronic clinical tool that was created in 2022 to help frontline clinicians grade envenomations due to European <i>Vipera</i> spp. and decide whether to use specific immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to test VipGrade<sup>®</sup> on a paediatric retrospective cohort (2001-2022) of cases of <i>Vipera</i> spp. envenomation and evaluate the concordance with the initial grading assigned by clinicians on admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each child in the cohort (<i>n</i> = 116), VipGrade<sup>®</sup> was applied by a single physician unaware of the initial clinical grading. We compared VipGrade<sup>®</sup> results with those obtained at the time of admission using the Audebert-Boels classification system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of discrepancies represented 26% of initial grade I (<i>n</i> = 39) cases, meaning that 10 children were upgraded to grade IIa (<i>n</i> = 9) or IIb (<i>n</i> = 1). The main reason was the VipGrade<sup>®</sup> cut-off for oedema size (4 cm) to distinguish grade I from grade II, while oedema evaluation using the Audebert-Boels clinical classification differs in this regard. The global correlation κ score was equal to 0.78; 0.71 with the exception of grades 0 (which is not usually a diagnostic issue); 0.64 considering both results for young children (age <6 years, <i>n</i> = 51) and 0.79 for older ones.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Upgrading cases inappropriately could have a major impact on treatment and the use of the antivenom. Even if specific immunotherapy with Viperfav<sup>®</sup> (MicroPharm Ltd, Newcastle Emlyn, Carmarthenshire, SA38 9BY, United Kingdom) is safe, its use when inappropriate cannot be justified, particularly in times of supply shortage, as we have experienced over the last 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current version of the VipGrade<sup>®</sup> electronic clinical tool produces a different distribution of envenomation grades, notably in grade I by overgrading a substantial number of cases. We suggest creating a paediatric version that incorporates the same oedema evaluation method as the Audebert-Boels clinical classification but also includes a more refined definition of \"local or regional\" oedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":"62 11","pages":"726-732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142686264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2402937
Cedar L Mitchell, Geoffrey Smelski, Kim Schmid, Maureen Roland, Matthew Christenberry, Katherine D Ellingson, Daniel E Brooks, Kenneth Komatsu, Steven Dudley, Farshad Shirazi, Theresa A Cullen
Introduction: Envenomation after a North American rattlesnake (Crotalus spp. and Sistrusus spp.) bite is associated with substantial morbidity. Arizona reports the highest number of rattlesnake envenomations annually in the United States. We evaluated the performance of poison and drug information centers for snakebite surveillance, compared with the hospital and emergency department discharge database. We used both datasets to improve the characterization of epidemiology, healthcare costs, and clinical effects of snakebite envenomations in Arizona.
Methods: We identified patients with a snakebite during 2017-2021 using Arizona hospital and emergency department discharge data and snakebite consults with two regional Arizona poison centers. Patients were matched using name and birthdate. The performance of poison center data for snakebite surveillance was evaluated using the percentage of snakebite patients in hospital and emergency department discharge data that consulted with poison centers. Patient demographics, healthcare characteristics, clinical effects, and context of snakebite events were described using both datasets.
Results: In total, 1,288 patients with a snakebite were identified using the Arizona hospital and emergency department discharge data, which resulted in 953 (74%) consultations with poison centers. The median age of patients was 48 years (IQR 28-62 years), and they were predominantly male (66%), White (90%), and non-Hispanic (84%). The median billed charges were US$ 84,880 (IQR US$ 13,286-US$ 168,043); the median duration of a healthcare stay was 34 h (IQR 13-48 h), and 29% of patients were transferred between healthcare facilities. Among 953 consulted poison center calls for a snakebite, a median of 14 vials of antivenom was administered per patient; 375 (60%) bites occurred near the home, and 345 (43%) patients were bitten on a lower extremity. One death was identified.
Discussion: Snakebites in Arizona can cause severe morbidity and require extensive healthcare resources for treatment. Poison centers are valuable for monitoring venomous snakebites in Arizona.
Conclusions: Using hospital and emergency department discharge data with poison center records can improve public health surveillance data regarding snakebite epidemiology and human-snake interaction information and be used to tailor interventions to increase awareness of snake encounters and prevent snakebites.
{"title":"Characterization of patients with a snakebite presenting to healthcare facilities and reported to poison and drug information centers-Arizona, 2017-2021.","authors":"Cedar L Mitchell, Geoffrey Smelski, Kim Schmid, Maureen Roland, Matthew Christenberry, Katherine D Ellingson, Daniel E Brooks, Kenneth Komatsu, Steven Dudley, Farshad Shirazi, Theresa A Cullen","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2402937","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2402937","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Envenomation after a North American rattlesnake (<i>Crotalus</i> spp. and <i>Sistrusus</i> spp.) bite is associated with substantial morbidity. Arizona reports the highest number of rattlesnake envenomations annually in the United States. We evaluated the performance of poison and drug information centers for snakebite surveillance, compared with the hospital and emergency department discharge database. We used both datasets to improve the characterization of epidemiology, healthcare costs, and clinical effects of snakebite envenomations in Arizona.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with a snakebite during 2017-2021 using Arizona hospital and emergency department discharge data and snakebite consults with two regional Arizona poison centers. Patients were matched using name and birthdate. The performance of poison center data for snakebite surveillance was evaluated using the percentage of snakebite patients in hospital and emergency department discharge data that consulted with poison centers. Patient demographics, healthcare characteristics, clinical effects, and context of snakebite events were described using both datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,288 patients with a snakebite were identified using the Arizona hospital and emergency department discharge data, which resulted in 953 (74%) consultations with poison centers. The median age of patients was 48 years (IQR 28-62 years), and they were predominantly male (66%), White (90%), and non-Hispanic (84%). The median billed charges were US$ 84,880 (IQR US$ 13,286-US$ 168,043); the median duration of a healthcare stay was 34 h (IQR 13-48 h), and 29% of patients were transferred between healthcare facilities. Among 953 consulted poison center calls for a snakebite, a median of 14 vials of antivenom was administered per patient; 375 (60%) bites occurred near the home, and 345 (43%) patients were bitten on a lower extremity. One death was identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Snakebites in Arizona can cause severe morbidity and require extensive healthcare resources for treatment. Poison centers are valuable for monitoring venomous snakebites in Arizona.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using hospital and emergency department discharge data with poison center records can improve public health surveillance data regarding snakebite epidemiology and human-snake interaction information and be used to tailor interventions to increase awareness of snake encounters and prevent snakebites.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"754-761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-28DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2400186
Kavita M Babu, Yara K Haddad, Shakiera T Causey, Carmen C Vargas-Torres, Patricia Mae Martinez, Elizabeth M Goldberg, Jon D Dorfman, Julia A Bleser, Brittany P Chapman, Jeffrey T Lai, Riyadh Saif, Romanda Elhoussan, Lindsey A Graham, Alex J Krotulski, Sara E Walton, F Dennis Thomas, Barry K Logan, Roland C Merchant
Background: In 2020, there were 36.7 million reported falls among older adults (65+) in the United States. Ethanol and other sedating substances may increase fall risk among older adults due to their effect on cognitive and physical function. We estimate the prevalence of these substances in blood specimens of older adults presenting with a fall injury at selected trauma centers.
Methods: The initial study collected blood specimens from May 2020 through July 2021 from adults undergoing a trauma team evaluation at selected United States Level 1 trauma centers. We limited our study to older adults evaluated after a fall (n = 1,365) and selected a random sample (n = 300) based on age, sex, and trauma-center quotas. Medical health records and blood specimens obtained at trauma center presentation were analyzed. We estimated the prevalence of ethanol, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, and opioids in the blood specimens. Two-sample tests of binomial proportions and Chi-square two-tailed tests were used to compare prevalence estimates of substances by demographic characteristics.
Results: At least one substance was detected among 31.3% of samples analyzed. Prevalences of specific substances detected were 9.3% (95% CI: 6.0-12.6%) for benzodiazepines, 4.3% (95% CI: 2.0-6.7%) for cannabinoids, 8.0% (95% CI: 5.2-11.7%) for ethanol, and 15.0% (95% CI: 10.9-19.1%) for opioids. There were 18 deaths (6%; 95% CI: 3.6-9.3%). One-third of decedents had at least one substance detected in their blood.
Discussion: Opioids were the most frequently detected substance, followed by benzodiazepines, ethanol, and cannabinoids. Substance use prevalence was not uniform across demographics, with differences observed by sex and age.
Conclusions: This study provides insight into the frequency of the presence of substances that may contribute to fall risk and serious injury among older adults. Screening older adults for substances that impair cognitive and physical function can enhance clinical fall prevention efforts.
{"title":"Detection of ethanol, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, and opioids in older adults evaluated for serious injuries from falls.","authors":"Kavita M Babu, Yara K Haddad, Shakiera T Causey, Carmen C Vargas-Torres, Patricia Mae Martinez, Elizabeth M Goldberg, Jon D Dorfman, Julia A Bleser, Brittany P Chapman, Jeffrey T Lai, Riyadh Saif, Romanda Elhoussan, Lindsey A Graham, Alex J Krotulski, Sara E Walton, F Dennis Thomas, Barry K Logan, Roland C Merchant","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2400186","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2400186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, there were 36.7 million reported falls among older adults (65+) in the United States. Ethanol and other sedating substances may increase fall risk among older adults due to their effect on cognitive and physical function. We estimate the prevalence of these substances in blood specimens of older adults presenting with a fall injury at selected trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial study collected blood specimens from May 2020 through July 2021 from adults undergoing a trauma team evaluation at selected United States Level 1 trauma centers. We limited our study to older adults evaluated after a fall (<i>n</i> = 1,365) and selected a random sample (<i>n</i> = 300) based on age, sex, and trauma-center quotas. Medical health records and blood specimens obtained at trauma center presentation were analyzed. We estimated the prevalence of ethanol, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, and opioids in the blood specimens. Two-sample tests of binomial proportions and Chi-square two-tailed tests were used to compare prevalence estimates of substances by demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At least one substance was detected among 31.3% of samples analyzed. Prevalences of specific substances detected were 9.3% (95% CI: 6.0-12.6%) for benzodiazepines, 4.3% (95% CI: 2.0-6.7%) for cannabinoids, 8.0% (95% CI: 5.2-11.7%) for ethanol, and 15.0% (95% CI: 10.9-19.1%) for opioids. There were 18 deaths (6%; 95% CI: 3.6-9.3%). One-third of decedents had at least one substance detected in their blood.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Opioids were the most frequently detected substance, followed by benzodiazepines, ethanol, and cannabinoids. Substance use prevalence was not uniform across demographics, with differences observed by sex and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insight into the frequency of the presence of substances that may contribute to fall risk and serious injury among older adults. Screening older adults for substances that impair cognitive and physical function can enhance clinical fall prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"661-668"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725768/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}