Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001807
Nicholas C Arpey, Jacob R Staub, Bejan A Alvandi, Erik B Gerlach, Joshua E Barrett, Michael T Peabody, Allison M Morgan, Srikanth N Divi, Wellington K Hsu, Alpesh A Patel
Study design: Prospective study (level II evidence).
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess recall accuracy and bias through PROMIS-PF (physical function) and PI (pain interference) scores in patients undergoing cervical or lumbar spine surgery.
Summary of background data: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have improved quantitative data availability; however, the interpretation of results may remain susceptible to confounding factors including recall accuracy. No studies to date have reported the accuracy of patient recall using PROMIS outcomes in spine patients.
Methods: Patients who underwent elective lumbar or cervical spine surgery were identified at a single tertiary, academic institution. PROMIS-PF and PI CAT (computer adaptive tests) were administered preoperatively. After a minimum 2-year follow-up, patients were administered these questionnaires and asked to answer with their recalled preoperative status. Recall accuracy was assessed by comparing recalled and actual baseline PROMIS scores. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the agreement between actual and recalled scores. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine potential demographic and temporal sources of bias.
Results: Lumbar surgery patients recalled significantly worse preoperative function (Δ -1.5, 95% CI (-2.8 to -0.3), P <0.05) and severe pain [Δ 2.1, 95% CI (0.5-3.6), P <0.01] than reported before surgery. Patients in the cervical cohort, in contrast, were more accurate in recall for both domains [PF Δ 1.8, 95% (CI -1.4 to 5.0), P >0.05 and PI Δ 0.0, 95% CI (-3.0 to 3.0), P >0.05]. The correlation between recalled and actual scores was moderate in both cohorts. Demographic and temporal variables did not significantly influence recall accuracy. Lumbar cohort patients who met PI MCID were more likely to accurately recall baseline pain scores.
Conclusion: Recall inaccuracy is present in patients who undergo spine surgery; however, patients on average recall significantly worse preoperative status as measured by PROMIS PF and PI scores. Accurate recollection of preoperative status may influence patient perception of care.
研究设计:前瞻性研究(二级证据)。目的:本研究的目的是通过promise - pf(身体功能)和PI(疼痛干扰)评分来评估颈椎或腰椎手术患者回忆的准确性和偏倚。背景数据总结:患者报告的结局(PROs)改善了定量数据的可用性;然而,对结果的解释可能仍然容易受到包括回忆准确性在内的混杂因素的影响。迄今为止还没有研究报道脊柱患者使用PROMIS结果回忆的准确性。方法:接受择期腰椎或颈椎手术的患者在一个单一的三级学术机构进行鉴定。术前进行promise - pf和PI CAT(计算机适应性测试)。在至少2年的随访后,患者接受了这些问卷调查,并被要求回答他们回忆的术前状态。通过比较回忆和实际基线PROMIS分数来评估回忆准确性。进行回归分析以评估实际得分和回忆得分之间的一致性。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定潜在的人口统计学和时间偏差来源。结果:腰椎手术患者回忆术前功能明显差(Δ -1.5, 95% CI (-2.8 ~ -0.3), P0.05, PI Δ 0.0, 95% CI (-3.0 ~ 3.0), P < 0.05)。在两个队列中,回忆分数和实际分数之间的相关性都是中等的。人口统计和时间变量对回忆准确率没有显著影响。符合PI MCID的腰椎队列患者更有可能准确回忆起基线疼痛评分。结论:脊柱手术患者存在回忆不准确;然而,通过PROMIS PF和PI评分,患者平均回忆起明显更差的术前状态。术前状态的准确回忆可能影响患者对护理的感知。
{"title":"Does PROMIS Identify Recall Accuracy and Bias in Elective Spine Surgery Patients?","authors":"Nicholas C Arpey, Jacob R Staub, Bejan A Alvandi, Erik B Gerlach, Joshua E Barrett, Michael T Peabody, Allison M Morgan, Srikanth N Divi, Wellington K Hsu, Alpesh A Patel","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001807","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study (level II evidence).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess recall accuracy and bias through PROMIS-PF (physical function) and PI (pain interference) scores in patients undergoing cervical or lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have improved quantitative data availability; however, the interpretation of results may remain susceptible to confounding factors including recall accuracy. No studies to date have reported the accuracy of patient recall using PROMIS outcomes in spine patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent elective lumbar or cervical spine surgery were identified at a single tertiary, academic institution. PROMIS-PF and PI CAT (computer adaptive tests) were administered preoperatively. After a minimum 2-year follow-up, patients were administered these questionnaires and asked to answer with their recalled preoperative status. Recall accuracy was assessed by comparing recalled and actual baseline PROMIS scores. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the agreement between actual and recalled scores. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine potential demographic and temporal sources of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lumbar surgery patients recalled significantly worse preoperative function (Δ -1.5, 95% CI (-2.8 to -0.3), P <0.05) and severe pain [Δ 2.1, 95% CI (0.5-3.6), P <0.01] than reported before surgery. Patients in the cervical cohort, in contrast, were more accurate in recall for both domains [PF Δ 1.8, 95% (CI -1.4 to 5.0), P >0.05 and PI Δ 0.0, 95% CI (-3.0 to 3.0), P >0.05]. The correlation between recalled and actual scores was moderate in both cohorts. Demographic and temporal variables did not significantly influence recall accuracy. Lumbar cohort patients who met PI MCID were more likely to accurately recall baseline pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recall inaccuracy is present in patients who undergo spine surgery; however, patients on average recall significantly worse preoperative status as measured by PROMIS PF and PI scores. Accurate recollection of preoperative status may influence patient perception of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E24-E31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143985410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-11DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001846
Hanli Yang, Dan Zhang, Wenjie Zhang, Man Luo, Liwei Wang, Yuanming Zhong, Ming Shi
Study design: This is a narrative review and case report.
Objective: To summarise and share relevant treatment experiences by analysing the clinical features of lymphatic leakage occurring after oblique approach retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), with a view to providing reference and guidance for clinical practice.
Methods: Clinical data of 3 patients with lymphatic leakage after OLIF surgery from December 2018 to April 2024 in the International Zhuang Medicine Hospital affiliated to Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analysed.
Results: Through postoperative bed rest, change of body position, regulation of diet and other treatments, postoperative lymphatic leakage was effectively controlled, and all 3 patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital.
Conclusion: Surgical operation damage to lymphatic vessels is an important cause of postoperative lymphatic leakage, nonsurgical treatment should be the first choice for treating lymphatic leakage, and strengthening high-protein diet is the key to treating lymphatic leakage.
{"title":"Clinical Characterization of Lymphatic Leakage Complicating OLIF Surgery.","authors":"Hanli Yang, Dan Zhang, Wenjie Zhang, Man Luo, Liwei Wang, Yuanming Zhong, Ming Shi","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001846","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001846","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a narrative review and case report.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarise and share relevant treatment experiences by analysing the clinical features of lymphatic leakage occurring after oblique approach retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), with a view to providing reference and guidance for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of 3 patients with lymphatic leakage after OLIF surgery from December 2018 to April 2024 in the International Zhuang Medicine Hospital affiliated to Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through postoperative bed rest, change of body position, regulation of diet and other treatments, postoperative lymphatic leakage was effectively controlled, and all 3 patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical operation damage to lymphatic vessels is an important cause of postoperative lymphatic leakage, nonsurgical treatment should be the first choice for treating lymphatic leakage, and strengthening high-protein diet is the key to treating lymphatic leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12825653/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144265508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-11DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001872
Andrew P Collins, Aaron J Clark, Alekos A Theologis
Study design: Operative video and supplemental manuscript.
Objective: To present a step-by-step approach to performing lamina-preserving lumbar posterior column osteotomies (PCO) for correction of adult thoracolumbar scoliosis.
Summary of background data: Outcomes of operations for adult thoracolumbar spinal deformities are dictated by adequate neural decompression, restoration of appropriate alignment, and achievement of fusion. A surgical strategy that optimizes attainment of all 3 of these goals is important to understand.
Methods: A step-by-step approach to performing lamina-preserving lumbar PCOs is provided through a case example and surgical technique video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CLINSPINE/A393 .
Results: Lamina-preserving PCOs performed at multiple levels are a particularly useful surgical strategy to correct adult thoracolumbar scoliosis, as they provide significant mobilization of the spine and allow for wide decompression of neural elements centrally and in the lateral recess and foramen while maintaining significant central osseous surfaces for interlaminar fusion.
Conclusions: Multilevel lamina-preserving PCOs allow for excellent neural decompression, powerful restoration of appropriate sagittal and coronal spinal alignment through release of the lumbar spine, and facilitate interlaminar union, all of which are critical to optimal outcomes of operations for adult thoracolumbar scoliosis.
{"title":"Lamina-preserving, Type II Posterior Column Osteotomies (PCOs) for Correction of Adult (Thoraco) Lumbar Scoliosis.","authors":"Andrew P Collins, Aaron J Clark, Alekos A Theologis","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001872","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001872","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Operative video and supplemental manuscript.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a step-by-step approach to performing lamina-preserving lumbar posterior column osteotomies (PCO) for correction of adult thoracolumbar scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Outcomes of operations for adult thoracolumbar spinal deformities are dictated by adequate neural decompression, restoration of appropriate alignment, and achievement of fusion. A surgical strategy that optimizes attainment of all 3 of these goals is important to understand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A step-by-step approach to performing lamina-preserving lumbar PCOs is provided through a case example and surgical technique video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CLINSPINE/A393 .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lamina-preserving PCOs performed at multiple levels are a particularly useful surgical strategy to correct adult thoracolumbar scoliosis, as they provide significant mobilization of the spine and allow for wide decompression of neural elements centrally and in the lateral recess and foramen while maintaining significant central osseous surfaces for interlaminar fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multilevel lamina-preserving PCOs allow for excellent neural decompression, powerful restoration of appropriate sagittal and coronal spinal alignment through release of the lumbar spine, and facilitate interlaminar union, all of which are critical to optimal outcomes of operations for adult thoracolumbar scoliosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144607714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001848
Cody D Schlaff, Sennay Ghenbot, Donald R Fredericks, Alfred J Pisano, Melvin D Helgeson, Scott C Wagner
The future of space exploration will include a prolonged presence on the Moon, commercial low-orbit spaceflight, and long-range missions to Deep Space, including a prolonged Martian presence. Understanding the effects the space environment will have on astronauts' musculoskeletal system is mission critical and include both microgravity and space radiation. In spaceflight, crewmembers are exposed to a vast mixture of radiation species and energies including cosmic rays (CR) from galactic cosmic radiation (GCR), solar ejections, and neutrons. Any trip beyond the protection of the Earth's electromagnetic field will expose astronauts to the near-maximum levels of lifetime allowable radiation exposure. We have previously reviewed how microgravity induces pathophysiological adaptations in the spine and how countermeasure strategies can play a role in minimizing astronaut morbidity. Now, through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Human Research Roadmap (HRR), there is a renewed interest in characterizing and mitigating the effects of radiation as astronauts prepare for the Artemis missions and beyond. Thus, our aim in this critical narrative review is to focus on how the second greatest challenge to crewmembers' health, radiation, and identify how potential countermeasures will affect the spine.
{"title":"Pathophysiological Spine Adaptations and Countermeasures for Prolonged Spaceflight: Part II-Space Radiation.","authors":"Cody D Schlaff, Sennay Ghenbot, Donald R Fredericks, Alfred J Pisano, Melvin D Helgeson, Scott C Wagner","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001848","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001848","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The future of space exploration will include a prolonged presence on the Moon, commercial low-orbit spaceflight, and long-range missions to Deep Space, including a prolonged Martian presence. Understanding the effects the space environment will have on astronauts' musculoskeletal system is mission critical and include both microgravity and space radiation. In spaceflight, crewmembers are exposed to a vast mixture of radiation species and energies including cosmic rays (CR) from galactic cosmic radiation (GCR), solar ejections, and neutrons. Any trip beyond the protection of the Earth's electromagnetic field will expose astronauts to the near-maximum levels of lifetime allowable radiation exposure. We have previously reviewed how microgravity induces pathophysiological adaptations in the spine and how countermeasure strategies can play a role in minimizing astronaut morbidity. Now, through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Human Research Roadmap (HRR), there is a renewed interest in characterizing and mitigating the effects of radiation as astronauts prepare for the Artemis missions and beyond. Thus, our aim in this critical narrative review is to focus on how the second greatest challenge to crewmembers' health, radiation, and identify how potential countermeasures will affect the spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145721474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001812
Brian M Shear, Anthony K Chiu, Adam Stombler, Sabrina Bustos, Amit Ratanpal, Rohan I Suresh, Alexander Ruditsky, Alexandra Lutz, Mario Sahlani, Jake Carbone, Idris Amin, Jay Karri, Louis J Bivona, Julio J Jauregui, Daniel L Cavanaugh, Eugene Y Koh, Steven C Ludwig
Study design: Retrospective analysis.
Objective: To compare sarcopenia to frailty and socioeconomic deprivation as preoperative predictors of mortality and complications in thoracolumbar spine trauma.
Summary of background data: Sarcopenia is a progressive musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the loss of muscle mass and function. Recently, it has gained recognition as an important surgical risk factor. Prior studies have demonstrated its association with adverse outcomes in spine surgery for degenerative, deformity, and neoplastic indications. Currently, there is a dearth of literature investigating the role of sarcopenia in thoracolumbar trauma.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing instrumentation and stabilization of thoracolumbar spine trauma were identified at an urban academic level-1 trauma center. Sarcopenia was measured using the L3 total psoas area over vertebral body area (L3-TPA/VBA) measured from perioperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Area deprivation index (ADI) was determined according to the publicly available Neighborhood Atlas data set. Frailty was measured using the modified 5-factor frailty index (mFI-5). Statistical analysis consisted of Pearson χ 2 tests, univariate logistic regression, determination of Spearman correlation coefficient ( rs ), and multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographics and polytraumatic injuries.
Results: A total of 276 patients were included. A total of 22 mortalities occurred (7.7%), with 18 (6.3%) occurring within 90-days postoperatively. On univariate analysis, only the mFI-5 scale was associated with 1-month (OR=2.42, P <0.001), 3-month (OR=2.61, P <0.001), and overall mortality (OR=2.29, P <0.001). On multivariate analysis, none of the sarcopenia, ADI, or mFI-5 were independently associated with mortality, the occurrence of postoperative complications, or revision.
Conclusions: Frailty is a better predictor of mortality in thoracolumbar trauma when compared with sarcopenia and ADI. However, an mFI threshold of 2+ may act synergistically with sarcopenia to increase mortality rates.
{"title":"Comparison of Sarcopenia With Frailty and Area Deprivation Index for Predicting Postoperative Mortality and Complications in Thoracolumbar Trauma.","authors":"Brian M Shear, Anthony K Chiu, Adam Stombler, Sabrina Bustos, Amit Ratanpal, Rohan I Suresh, Alexander Ruditsky, Alexandra Lutz, Mario Sahlani, Jake Carbone, Idris Amin, Jay Karri, Louis J Bivona, Julio J Jauregui, Daniel L Cavanaugh, Eugene Y Koh, Steven C Ludwig","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001812","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare sarcopenia to frailty and socioeconomic deprivation as preoperative predictors of mortality and complications in thoracolumbar spine trauma.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Sarcopenia is a progressive musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the loss of muscle mass and function. Recently, it has gained recognition as an important surgical risk factor. Prior studies have demonstrated its association with adverse outcomes in spine surgery for degenerative, deformity, and neoplastic indications. Currently, there is a dearth of literature investigating the role of sarcopenia in thoracolumbar trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing instrumentation and stabilization of thoracolumbar spine trauma were identified at an urban academic level-1 trauma center. Sarcopenia was measured using the L3 total psoas area over vertebral body area (L3-TPA/VBA) measured from perioperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Area deprivation index (ADI) was determined according to the publicly available Neighborhood Atlas data set. Frailty was measured using the modified 5-factor frailty index (mFI-5). Statistical analysis consisted of Pearson χ 2 tests, univariate logistic regression, determination of Spearman correlation coefficient ( rs ), and multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographics and polytraumatic injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 276 patients were included. A total of 22 mortalities occurred (7.7%), with 18 (6.3%) occurring within 90-days postoperatively. On univariate analysis, only the mFI-5 scale was associated with 1-month (OR=2.42, P <0.001), 3-month (OR=2.61, P <0.001), and overall mortality (OR=2.29, P <0.001). On multivariate analysis, none of the sarcopenia, ADI, or mFI-5 were independently associated with mortality, the occurrence of postoperative complications, or revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty is a better predictor of mortality in thoracolumbar trauma when compared with sarcopenia and ADI. However, an mFI threshold of 2+ may act synergistically with sarcopenia to increase mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E54-E62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143794838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001981
Paul Köhli, Jan Hambrecht, Jiaqi Zhu, Erika Chiapparelli, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Koki Tsuchiya, Ellen Otto, Lukas Schönnagel, Denise Jahn, Jennifer Shue, Marco D Burkhard, Matthias Pumberger, Andrew A Sama, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Alexander P Hughes
Study design: Secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study at an academic tertiary spine care center.
Objectives: To examine the prevalence and risk factors for preoperative Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and to assess the seasonal variation of metabolic bone laboratory parameters in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (LFS).
Summary of background data: LFS relies on adequate connective tissue quality and bone healing capacity. VitD deficiency and SHPT significantly impact bone metabolism and are linked to lower fusion rates and poorer bone quality. However, their seasonal variation in LFS patients remains unexplored.
Methods: Patients undergoing LFS for degenerative conditions received preoperative VitD, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone turnover markers laboratory routinely from December 2014 to December 2023. Descriptive and comparative statistics, logistic regression, and univariable and multivariable cosinor regression models were used to evaluate VitD status, SHPT prevalence, their risk-factors and seasonal variations in VitD, PTH, and bone turnover markers.
Results: Data from 431 patients (49% female, median age 64 y) was analyzed. VitD insufficiency (<30 ng/mL) was observed in 34% of patients, ranging from 48% in winter to 25% in summer. SHPT was present in 24%, with winter prevalence at 28%. Surgery during winter and spring was associated with a 7.5-fold increased risk of VitD deficiency and a 2.1-fold increased risk of SHPT. Seasonal changes with peaks for VitD, PTH, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were observed in July, February, and November, respectively, with no significant annual variation in other bone metabolism markers.
Conclusions: The prevalence of VitD deficiency and SHPT in LFS patients is high, especially during winter and spring. Seasonal variations in VitD and bone metabolism markers suggest that single-timepoint laboratory evaluations may not reflect bone metabolism throughout the year, highlighting the need for further studies investigating whether seasonal factors in preoperative assessments could affect outcomes.
{"title":"Seasonal Variation of Vitamin D, PTH, and Bone Turnover Markers in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery.","authors":"Paul Köhli, Jan Hambrecht, Jiaqi Zhu, Erika Chiapparelli, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Koki Tsuchiya, Ellen Otto, Lukas Schönnagel, Denise Jahn, Jennifer Shue, Marco D Burkhard, Matthias Pumberger, Andrew A Sama, Federico P Girardi, Frank P Cammisa, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001981","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001981","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study at an academic tertiary spine care center.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the prevalence and risk factors for preoperative Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and to assess the seasonal variation of metabolic bone laboratory parameters in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (LFS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>LFS relies on adequate connective tissue quality and bone healing capacity. VitD deficiency and SHPT significantly impact bone metabolism and are linked to lower fusion rates and poorer bone quality. However, their seasonal variation in LFS patients remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing LFS for degenerative conditions received preoperative VitD, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone turnover markers laboratory routinely from December 2014 to December 2023. Descriptive and comparative statistics, logistic regression, and univariable and multivariable cosinor regression models were used to evaluate VitD status, SHPT prevalence, their risk-factors and seasonal variations in VitD, PTH, and bone turnover markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 431 patients (49% female, median age 64 y) was analyzed. VitD insufficiency (<30 ng/mL) was observed in 34% of patients, ranging from 48% in winter to 25% in summer. SHPT was present in 24%, with winter prevalence at 28%. Surgery during winter and spring was associated with a 7.5-fold increased risk of VitD deficiency and a 2.1-fold increased risk of SHPT. Seasonal changes with peaks for VitD, PTH, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were observed in July, February, and November, respectively, with no significant annual variation in other bone metabolism markers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of VitD deficiency and SHPT in LFS patients is high, especially during winter and spring. Seasonal variations in VitD and bone metabolism markers suggest that single-timepoint laboratory evaluations may not reflect bone metabolism throughout the year, highlighting the need for further studies investigating whether seasonal factors in preoperative assessments could affect outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000002008
Anna-Katharina Calek, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jonas Widmer, Ines Unterfrauner, Jana Felicitas Schader, Mazda Farshad
Study design: Retrospective study.
Objective: To evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of fusionless lumbar spine stabilization using a tendon allograft loop through the spinous process, following microsurgical decompression to address procedure-related destabilization.
Summary of background data: The limitations of traditional spinal fusion and decompression surgeries have driven the development of motion-preserving alternatives that maintain natural vertebral mobility while providing structural stability, thereby reducing complications and long-term consequences associated with rigid fixation.
Methods: Twenty patients with low-grade stable degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent primary lumbar decompression for spinal stenosis and ligamentous stabilization using the trans-spinous tendon allograft technique between 2022 and 2023 were included. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back/leg pain were recorded. Radiographs assessed adjacent segment degeneration and spinous process integrity, and MRI scans evaluated decompression and tendon allograft status.
Results: Median ODI improved significantly at all time points compared with baseline: 6-month ODI: 16 points (IQR=4.5-26), P=0.0013; 1-year ODI: 16.5 points (IQR=4-22), P=0.0013, with no significant difference between 6-month and 1-year results (P=1). Similar trends were observed for scores. One patient required revision surgery due to a facet joint cyst compressing a nerve root. Eleven patients (55%) experienced spinous process fractures, but clinical outcomes did not differ between patients with and without fractures: 6-month ODI: P=0.921, 1-year ODI: P=0.985; 6-month VAS back: P=0.507, 1-year VAS back: P=0.767; 6-month VAS leg: P=0.826, 1-year VAS leg: P=0.747. Patients with fractures were significantly older (P=0.023).
Conclusion: The trans-spinous process vertebropexy technique with decompressive bilateral laminotomy compromises spinous process integrity, causing high fracture rates. Although these fractures have minimal clinical impact, the current stabilization technique should be abandoned due to inadequate safety and efficacy. Technique refinement, larger prospective studies, and extended follow-up are necessary before clinical implementation.
Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective analysis.
{"title":"Trans-Spinous Process Vertebropexy Technique for Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Case Series.","authors":"Anna-Katharina Calek, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jonas Widmer, Ines Unterfrauner, Jana Felicitas Schader, Mazda Farshad","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000002008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000002008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of fusionless lumbar spine stabilization using a tendon allograft loop through the spinous process, following microsurgical decompression to address procedure-related destabilization.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The limitations of traditional spinal fusion and decompression surgeries have driven the development of motion-preserving alternatives that maintain natural vertebral mobility while providing structural stability, thereby reducing complications and long-term consequences associated with rigid fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with low-grade stable degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent primary lumbar decompression for spinal stenosis and ligamentous stabilization using the trans-spinous tendon allograft technique between 2022 and 2023 were included. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back/leg pain were recorded. Radiographs assessed adjacent segment degeneration and spinous process integrity, and MRI scans evaluated decompression and tendon allograft status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ODI improved significantly at all time points compared with baseline: 6-month ODI: 16 points (IQR=4.5-26), P=0.0013; 1-year ODI: 16.5 points (IQR=4-22), P=0.0013, with no significant difference between 6-month and 1-year results (P=1). Similar trends were observed for scores. One patient required revision surgery due to a facet joint cyst compressing a nerve root. Eleven patients (55%) experienced spinous process fractures, but clinical outcomes did not differ between patients with and without fractures: 6-month ODI: P=0.921, 1-year ODI: P=0.985; 6-month VAS back: P=0.507, 1-year VAS back: P=0.767; 6-month VAS leg: P=0.826, 1-year VAS leg: P=0.747. Patients with fractures were significantly older (P=0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The trans-spinous process vertebropexy technique with decompressive bilateral laminotomy compromises spinous process integrity, causing high fracture rates. Although these fractures have minimal clinical impact, the current stabilization technique should be abandoned due to inadequate safety and efficacy. Technique refinement, larger prospective studies, and extended follow-up are necessary before clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146060468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000002032
Ruchit V Patel, Joshua I Chalif, Rohan Jha, Eric J Chalif, Velina Chavarro, Ron Gadot, Jessica Baker, Yi Lu
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To understand the strengths of titanium cages for ACDF using a propensity score matched analysis while characterizing radiologic and clinical outcomes associated with graft material.
Summary of background evidence: Structural allografts and synthetic grafts such as titanium cages have been frequently utilized for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Although the biomechanical properties have been compared between these 2 graft types, there remains limited data on their comparative performance for cervical procedures.
Methods: We assembled a cohort of patients who underwent an ACDF with a structural allograft or titanium cage at a tertiary care medical center and community hospital by a single surgeon. To compare outcomes, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using optimal pair matching and a generalized linear model.
Results: Of 376 patients, 269 received a structural allograft and 107 a titanium cage [median age: 56 y, 51.6% (n=194) female, 22.9% (n=86) current smokers]. Almost half of ACDFs (161 patients, 42.8%) were multilevel fusions. Across both graft materials, ACDFs had a relatively safe complication profile with a low intraoperative blood loss. There was durable symptom relief, with 94.5% (n=345 of 365) of patients reporting improved to resolved symptoms at last follow-up. Patients with titanium cages had significantly greater cervical Cobb angle change compared with patients with structural allografts (P<0.001). After propensity score matching, patients with titanium cages had a lower estimated blood loss (P=0.03) and shorter hospital length of stay (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in rates of fusion, cage subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, or revision surgery.
Conclusions: Titanium cages demonstrate a similar safety and efficacy profile to structural allografts and may enable greater cervical Cobb angle changes. Longer neurosurgical follow-up may be required to assess need for revision procedures and quantitative patient-reported outcomes across cage materials.
{"title":"Titanium Cage Versus Structural Allograft for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.","authors":"Ruchit V Patel, Joshua I Chalif, Rohan Jha, Eric J Chalif, Velina Chavarro, Ron Gadot, Jessica Baker, Yi Lu","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000002032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000002032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the strengths of titanium cages for ACDF using a propensity score matched analysis while characterizing radiologic and clinical outcomes associated with graft material.</p><p><strong>Summary of background evidence: </strong>Structural allografts and synthetic grafts such as titanium cages have been frequently utilized for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Although the biomechanical properties have been compared between these 2 graft types, there remains limited data on their comparative performance for cervical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assembled a cohort of patients who underwent an ACDF with a structural allograft or titanium cage at a tertiary care medical center and community hospital by a single surgeon. To compare outcomes, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using optimal pair matching and a generalized linear model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 376 patients, 269 received a structural allograft and 107 a titanium cage [median age: 56 y, 51.6% (n=194) female, 22.9% (n=86) current smokers]. Almost half of ACDFs (161 patients, 42.8%) were multilevel fusions. Across both graft materials, ACDFs had a relatively safe complication profile with a low intraoperative blood loss. There was durable symptom relief, with 94.5% (n=345 of 365) of patients reporting improved to resolved symptoms at last follow-up. Patients with titanium cages had significantly greater cervical Cobb angle change compared with patients with structural allografts (P<0.001). After propensity score matching, patients with titanium cages had a lower estimated blood loss (P=0.03) and shorter hospital length of stay (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in rates of fusion, cage subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, or revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Titanium cages demonstrate a similar safety and efficacy profile to structural allografts and may enable greater cervical Cobb angle changes. Longer neurosurgical follow-up may be required to assess need for revision procedures and quantitative patient-reported outcomes across cage materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001939
Ryan Snowden, Cara Ford, Barrett Boody, Joseph Smucker, Daniel Leas, Rick Sasso
Study design: Retrospective review.
Objective: Determine the rate of bony union of an integrated cage/screw polyether-ethyl ketone (PEEK) cervical interbody fusion device with computed tomography (CT) and provide long-term outcomes of patients treated with such.
Summary of background data: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common treatment option for patients with degenerative cervical conditions that have failed conservative treatment. Stand-alone anchored cages offer the theoretical advantage of decreasing soft tissue dissection off the anterior vertebral body and mitigating risk to surrounding structures while still achieving solid fusion.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from a single institution's enrollment data during a postmarket surveillance study for the Stalif-C (Centinel Spine, West Chester, PA). Three surgeons independently reviewed CT scans from 1 and 2-year follow-up visits to assess for fusion. The criteria for fusion were the presence of bridging bone in at least one of 5 regions (anterior, posterior, right, left uncovertebral joint, and intracage) on 2 consecutive slices of the CT scan using 1 mm coronal and sagittal reformats. These same surgeons repeated their assessment of the imaging studies at a minimum of 2 weeks after the initial review. The resulting fusion rates were then averaged to provide a mean fusion rate at the 1 and 2-year points.
Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled in the study with 2 patients withdrawing consent after the procedure. Thirty had completed their 1-year follow-up with imaging studies comprising 32 levels treated. Twenty-three patients (25 levels) completed a 2-year follow-up at the time of this study. The average bony fusion rate at 1 year was 37% (range: 19%-56%) and at 2 years was 50% (range: 40%-60%).
Conclusion: The rate of bony fusion as assessed by CT scans at 1 and 2 years was 37% and 50%, respectively. This is well below previously published fusion rates for standalone constructs.
Level of evidence: Level III.
研究设计:回顾性研究。目的:通过计算机断层扫描(CT)确定一体化笼/螺钉聚醚乙基酮(PEEK)颈椎椎体间融合器的骨愈合率,并提供患者的长期预后。背景资料总结:对于保守治疗失败的退行性颈椎疾病患者,前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)是一种常见的治疗选择。独立的锚定笼在理论上具有优势,可以减少前椎体的软组织剥离,降低对周围结构的风险,同时仍能实现固体融合。方法:对Stalif-C (Centinel Spine, West Chester, PA)上市后监测研究中单个机构的入组数据进行回顾性分析。三位外科医生独立回顾了1年和2年随访的CT扫描,以评估融合情况。融合的标准是在使用1mm冠状面和矢状面重新格式化的连续2张CT扫描片上,5个区域(前、后、右、左无椎关节和内腔)中至少有一个存在桥接骨。这些外科医生在初次复查后至少2周内重复对影像学检查的评估。然后将所得的融合率取平均值,以提供1年和2年的平均融合率。结果:共有34例患者入组,2例患者在手术后撤回同意。其中30人完成了为期1年的随访,包括32个治疗水平的影像学研究。23名患者(25个级别)完成了为期2年的随访。1年的平均骨融合率为37%(范围:19%-56%),2年的平均骨融合率为50%(范围:40%-60%)。结论:1年和2年CT评估骨融合率分别为37%和50%。这远远低于先前公布的独立结构的融合率。证据等级:三级。
{"title":"Assessment of Bony Fusion With an Integrated Cage/Screw Device for Anterior Cervical Fusion With Computed Tomography.","authors":"Ryan Snowden, Cara Ford, Barrett Boody, Joseph Smucker, Daniel Leas, Rick Sasso","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the rate of bony union of an integrated cage/screw polyether-ethyl ketone (PEEK) cervical interbody fusion device with computed tomography (CT) and provide long-term outcomes of patients treated with such.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common treatment option for patients with degenerative cervical conditions that have failed conservative treatment. Stand-alone anchored cages offer the theoretical advantage of decreasing soft tissue dissection off the anterior vertebral body and mitigating risk to surrounding structures while still achieving solid fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted from a single institution's enrollment data during a postmarket surveillance study for the Stalif-C (Centinel Spine, West Chester, PA). Three surgeons independently reviewed CT scans from 1 and 2-year follow-up visits to assess for fusion. The criteria for fusion were the presence of bridging bone in at least one of 5 regions (anterior, posterior, right, left uncovertebral joint, and intracage) on 2 consecutive slices of the CT scan using 1 mm coronal and sagittal reformats. These same surgeons repeated their assessment of the imaging studies at a minimum of 2 weeks after the initial review. The resulting fusion rates were then averaged to provide a mean fusion rate at the 1 and 2-year points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 patients were enrolled in the study with 2 patients withdrawing consent after the procedure. Thirty had completed their 1-year follow-up with imaging studies comprising 32 levels treated. Twenty-three patients (25 levels) completed a 2-year follow-up at the time of this study. The average bony fusion rate at 1 year was 37% (range: 19%-56%) and at 2 years was 50% (range: 40%-60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of bony fusion as assessed by CT scans at 1 and 2 years was 37% and 50%, respectively. This is well below previously published fusion rates for standalone constructs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000002022
Huiling Linda Lim, Zhiquan Damian Lee, A Aravin Kumar, Robin Pillay, Zhihong Chew, Andy Kuei Siong Yeo, Terry Hong Lee Teo, Shree Kumar Dinesh, Ji Min Ling, Lester Lee
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: To assess the impact of frailty, using modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), and sarcopenia, using temporalis muscle thickness (TMT), on motor and functional outcomes in patients with acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS).
Summary of background data: Patients who suffer from ATCCS often are elderly patients who may be frail and sarcopenic. It would be useful to know the impact it has on their outcome, to see how they fair and identify the areas that need improvement.
Methods: Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the optimal cut-off value of TMT at 3.965 mm. Patients were considered sarcopenic if their average TMT value was less than 3.965 mm. Primary outcomes were significant improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association Motor Score (AMS) scores at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were significant improvement in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at 6 months, and significant recovery of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) at 6 months. Logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of mFI-5 and TMT on these outcomes.
Results: A total of 80 patients were used in this study. Significant improvement in AMS improvement (71.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.028), significant improvement in FIM (42.9% vs. 71.2%, P=0.013), and significant recovery in mJOA (14% vs. 38%, P=0.039) were all significantly lower in sarcopenic patients. Multivariate analysis found that the presence of sarcopenia was inversely related to significant improvement in FIM at 6 months (OR 0.026, 95% CI 0.002-0.414, P=0.010). The MFI score of 0 was positively associated with significant improvement in FIM at 6 months (OR 64.189, 95% CI 2.643-1412.016, P=0.010).
Conclusions: Frailty and sarcopenia have a significant effect on motor and functional outcomes in ATCCS patients.
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:利用改良的5项衰弱指数(mFI-5)和颞肌厚度(TMT)评估肌肉减少症对急性创伤性中枢脊髓综合征(ATCCS)患者运动和功能结局的影响。背景资料总结:ATCCS患者多为老年患者,体弱多病,肌肉萎缩。了解它对其结果的影响,了解它们如何公平并确定需要改进的领域将是有用的。方法:通过对受者工作特性的分析,确定TMT的最佳临界值为3.965 mm。如果患者的平均TMT值小于3.965 mm,则认为患者肌肉减少。主要结果是6个月和12个月时美国脊髓损伤协会运动评分(AMS)评分显著改善。次要结果是6个月时功能独立测量(FIM)显著改善,6个月时改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)显著恢复。采用Logistic回归来评估mFI-5和TMT对这些结果的影响。结果:本研究共纳入80例患者。肌少症患者AMS改善的显著改善(71.4%比90.4%,P=0.028)、FIM改善的显著改善(42.9%比71.2%,P=0.013)和mJOA恢复的显著改善(14%比38%,P=0.039)均显著降低。多因素分析发现,肌少症的存在与6个月时FIM的显著改善呈负相关(OR 0.026, 95% CI 0.002-0.414, P=0.010)。MFI评分为0与6个月时FIM的显著改善呈正相关(OR 64.189, 95% CI 2.643-1412.016, P=0.010)。结论:虚弱和肌肉减少对ATCCS患者的运动和功能预后有显著影响。
{"title":"The Impact of Sarcopenia and Frailty on Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome.","authors":"Huiling Linda Lim, Zhiquan Damian Lee, A Aravin Kumar, Robin Pillay, Zhihong Chew, Andy Kuei Siong Yeo, Terry Hong Lee Teo, Shree Kumar Dinesh, Ji Min Ling, Lester Lee","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000002022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000002022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of frailty, using modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), and sarcopenia, using temporalis muscle thickness (TMT), on motor and functional outcomes in patients with acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Patients who suffer from ATCCS often are elderly patients who may be frail and sarcopenic. It would be useful to know the impact it has on their outcome, to see how they fair and identify the areas that need improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the optimal cut-off value of TMT at 3.965 mm. Patients were considered sarcopenic if their average TMT value was less than 3.965 mm. Primary outcomes were significant improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association Motor Score (AMS) scores at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were significant improvement in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at 6 months, and significant recovery of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) at 6 months. Logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of mFI-5 and TMT on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients were used in this study. Significant improvement in AMS improvement (71.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.028), significant improvement in FIM (42.9% vs. 71.2%, P=0.013), and significant recovery in mJOA (14% vs. 38%, P=0.039) were all significantly lower in sarcopenic patients. Multivariate analysis found that the presence of sarcopenia was inversely related to significant improvement in FIM at 6 months (OR 0.026, 95% CI 0.002-0.414, P=0.010). The MFI score of 0 was positively associated with significant improvement in FIM at 6 months (OR 64.189, 95% CI 2.643-1412.016, P=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty and sarcopenia have a significant effect on motor and functional outcomes in ATCCS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}