Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-11DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01488-3
Julia Browne, Zachary Kunicki, L Fredrik Jarskog, Paschal Sheeran, Ana M Abrantes, Tonya Elliott, Oscar Gonzalez, David L Penn, Claudio Battaglini
Physical activity improves mental health in individuals with schizophrenia. Yet, limited access, low motivation, and social isolation make participation in face-to-face programs challenging. This 16-week pilot randomized controlled trial examined differences in symptoms and loneliness between adults with schizophrenia that were randomized to a virtual group-based walking program ("Virtual PACE-Life", n = 17) or Fitbit Alone (n = 20). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and UCLA Loneliness scale were administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and one-month follow-up. Standardized effects (SE) and confidence intervals from mixed effects models were used to evaluate group differences. Results demonstrated small-to-moderate effects (SE: 0.1-0.3) on total, negative, disorganization, excitement, and emotional distress symptoms favoring Virtual PACE-Life; however, negligible effects were observed for positive symptoms or loneliness. Despite the small sample size, these findings may suggest symptom but not loneliness benefits of a virtual group-based physical activity program for people with schizophrenia.
{"title":"Virtual Group-based Walking Intervention for Adults with Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: Psychosocial Outcome Results from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Julia Browne, Zachary Kunicki, L Fredrik Jarskog, Paschal Sheeran, Ana M Abrantes, Tonya Elliott, Oscar Gonzalez, David L Penn, Claudio Battaglini","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01488-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01488-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical activity improves mental health in individuals with schizophrenia. Yet, limited access, low motivation, and social isolation make participation in face-to-face programs challenging. This 16-week pilot randomized controlled trial examined differences in symptoms and loneliness between adults with schizophrenia that were randomized to a virtual group-based walking program (\"Virtual PACE-Life\", n = 17) or Fitbit Alone (n = 20). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and UCLA Loneliness scale were administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and one-month follow-up. Standardized effects (SE) and confidence intervals from mixed effects models were used to evaluate group differences. Results demonstrated small-to-moderate effects (SE: 0.1-0.3) on total, negative, disorganization, excitement, and emotional distress symptoms favoring Virtual PACE-Life; however, negligible effects were observed for positive symptoms or loneliness. Despite the small sample size, these findings may suggest symptom but not loneliness benefits of a virtual group-based physical activity program for people with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1529-1535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12878843/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144607731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01484-7
Neasa Ní Dhoibhilín, Owen Doody, David Bohan, Louise Murphy
Community/Crisis Cafés offer an alternative, out-of-hours mental health support by providing a safe, peer/clinician-supported environment for individuals in crisis. These cafés utilise peer support models that draw on personal experience, fostering connections and aiding in crisis management. Despite the growing global implementation of these cafés, limited research exists on how service users and carers experience and benefit from them. This study aims to explore the perspectives of service users and carers on accessing and utilising support through community/crisis cafés both nationally and internationally. A scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and included keyword searches of eight databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science), combined with grey literature searches of LENSUS, Health Service Executive, WHO Global Index, NHS, and Open Grey. Backward and forward chaining of references was also completed to ensure all literature was sourced. Papers were limited to 2010-2023 and in English. Covidence was used for the screening process, ten papers met the review criteria and are reported as per the PRISMA-ScR checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. The findings of ten papers on service users and carers experiences indicate that Community/Crisis Cafés can have a positive impact on mental health management, alleviate social isolation, and reduce emergency department use. However, challenges such as consistency in service delivery and accessibility were noted. Further research and ongoing evaluation are necessary to fully understand the efficacy and limitations of this alternative co-produced, community mental health service delivery model.
社区/危机咖啡馆通过为处于危机中的个人提供安全、同伴/临床医生支持的环境,提供了另一种非工作时间的心理健康支持。这些咖啡厅利用基于个人经验的同伴支持模式,促进联系并协助危机管理。尽管在全球范围内越来越多地实施这些cafims,但关于服务使用者和照护者如何体验并从中受益的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨服务使用者和照护者通过国内和国际社区/危机培训获得和利用支持的观点。在Arksey和O'Malley的框架指导下进行范围审查,包括八个数据库(Academic Search Complete, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus和Web of Science)的关键词搜索,并结合LENSUS, Health Service Executive, WHO Global Index, NHS和Open grey的灰色文献搜索。还完成了参考文献的向后和向前链接,以确保所有文献的来源。论文限于2010-2023年,且为英文。筛选过程使用covid - ence, 10篇论文符合审查标准,并根据PRISMA- scr检查表和PRISMA流程图进行报告。10篇关于服务使用者和护理人员经验的论文的研究结果表明,社区/危机cafims可以对心理健康管理、减轻社会孤立和减少急诊室的使用产生积极影响。但是,也注意到服务提供的一致性和可及性等挑战。进一步的研究和持续的评估是必要的,以充分了解这种替代性的共同生产,社区精神卫生服务提供模式的有效性和局限性。
{"title":"Community/Crisis Cafés: Perspectives of Service Users and Carers Scoping Review.","authors":"Neasa Ní Dhoibhilín, Owen Doody, David Bohan, Louise Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01484-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01484-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community/Crisis Cafés offer an alternative, out-of-hours mental health support by providing a safe, peer/clinician-supported environment for individuals in crisis. These cafés utilise peer support models that draw on personal experience, fostering connections and aiding in crisis management. Despite the growing global implementation of these cafés, limited research exists on how service users and carers experience and benefit from them. This study aims to explore the perspectives of service users and carers on accessing and utilising support through community/crisis cafés both nationally and internationally. A scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and included keyword searches of eight databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science), combined with grey literature searches of LENSUS, Health Service Executive, WHO Global Index, NHS, and Open Grey. Backward and forward chaining of references was also completed to ensure all literature was sourced. Papers were limited to 2010-2023 and in English. Covidence was used for the screening process, ten papers met the review criteria and are reported as per the PRISMA-ScR checklist and PRISMA flow diagram. The findings of ten papers on service users and carers experiences indicate that Community/Crisis Cafés can have a positive impact on mental health management, alleviate social isolation, and reduce emergency department use. However, challenges such as consistency in service delivery and accessibility were noted. Further research and ongoing evaluation are necessary to fully understand the efficacy and limitations of this alternative co-produced, community mental health service delivery model.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1492-1506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-06-28DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01485-6
Carol Lim, Sophie Freudenreich, James McKowen, Sarah Maclaurin, Oliver Freudenreich
Climate anxiety can motivate adaptive behaviors but can become debilitating when excessive. People with schizophrenia are particularly vulnerable to extreme climate events, yet little is known about their climate-related concerns. This study examines climate anxiety levels and perceptions of government responses in outpatients with schizophrenia to inform targeted mental health interventions. From March to July 2024, 108 adult outpatients with schizophrenia participated in semi-structured interviews using two validated surveys assessing climate-related emotions and beliefs about government responses. Many participants reported moderate climate anxiety, with some dissatisfaction regarding government actions. Severe functional impairments due to climate anxiety were uncommon. Understanding climate anxiety in people with schizophrenia, an easily overlooked vulnerable group to climate change-related morbidity and mortality, is critical to enhance preparedness and mitigate psychiatric and physical health risks.
{"title":"Climate Change Anxiety in Adults with Schizophrenia: a Descriptive Study.","authors":"Carol Lim, Sophie Freudenreich, James McKowen, Sarah Maclaurin, Oliver Freudenreich","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01485-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01485-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Climate anxiety can motivate adaptive behaviors but can become debilitating when excessive. People with schizophrenia are particularly vulnerable to extreme climate events, yet little is known about their climate-related concerns. This study examines climate anxiety levels and perceptions of government responses in outpatients with schizophrenia to inform targeted mental health interventions. From March to July 2024, 108 adult outpatients with schizophrenia participated in semi-structured interviews using two validated surveys assessing climate-related emotions and beliefs about government responses. Many participants reported moderate climate anxiety, with some dissatisfaction regarding government actions. Severe functional impairments due to climate anxiety were uncommon. Understanding climate anxiety in people with schizophrenia, an easily overlooked vulnerable group to climate change-related morbidity and mortality, is critical to enhance preparedness and mitigate psychiatric and physical health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1507-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144526669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01495-4
Chelsea Ho, Eileen McDonald, Tania Perich
People living with bipolar disorders may face a range of treatment challenges, however, the treatment needs of those living with bipolar disorder in Australia have not been directly assessed. The present study aimed to explore the treatment and care preferences of people living with bipolar disorder in Australia. Participants were part of a large co-designed survey that assessed preferred settings, barriers, and access to treatment. A total of 494 participants provided responses regarding preferred treatment settings with 188 (38%) preferring the public system, 175 (35%) private, and 153 (31%) indicating a preference for both/either private or public care. The setting that was most frequently endorsed was at home (n = 343; 69%), then outpatient (n = 155; 31%), and inpatient (n = 93; 19%). Affordability, resourcing, geographical and timely access, improving education and addressing stigma were reported as key unmet needs, indicating that more work is needed to improve access to care for Australians.
{"title":"Mental Health Treatment Needs and Preferences for People Living with Bipolar Disorder in Australia.","authors":"Chelsea Ho, Eileen McDonald, Tania Perich","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01495-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01495-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People living with bipolar disorders may face a range of treatment challenges, however, the treatment needs of those living with bipolar disorder in Australia have not been directly assessed. The present study aimed to explore the treatment and care preferences of people living with bipolar disorder in Australia. Participants were part of a large co-designed survey that assessed preferred settings, barriers, and access to treatment. A total of 494 participants provided responses regarding preferred treatment settings with 188 (38%) preferring the public system, 175 (35%) private, and 153 (31%) indicating a preference for both/either private or public care. The setting that was most frequently endorsed was at home (n = 343; 69%), then outpatient (n = 155; 31%), and inpatient (n = 93; 19%). Affordability, resourcing, geographical and timely access, improving education and addressing stigma were reported as key unmet needs, indicating that more work is needed to improve access to care for Australians.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1599-1607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647162/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144759355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01470-z
Imogen Nevard, Helen Brooks, Judith Gellatly, Fritz Handerer, Penny Bee
Children Of Parents with severe and enduring Mental Illness (COPMI) face an elevated risk for inherited mental health issues and diminished quality of life across various domains. While social factors such as social networks (the set of active, valued social ties surrounding an individual) are recognised as protective, they are often inadequately conceptualised, preventing effective leverage to promote positive outcomes. This brief report provides information regarding common network related issues faced by families, opportunities for supportive intervention, barriers and facilitators to social network conscious work with COPMI according to professionals. Professionals who work with individuals or families affected by parental mental illness provided insights as to how social network considerations can or do feature in their work via focus group discussions. Focus group transcripts were analysed through an a priori framework developed through framework analysis in order to identify common issues, potential interventions, and barriers and facilitators in their work. Commonly observed issues within family networks included the impact of caring roles, structural limitations to networks, and experiences related to stigma and trust. Network related intervention opportunities included early identification, support for community integration efforts, and child skills building. Barriers included lack of needs identification, communication gaps, and staff workload pressures. Potential facilitators include ongoing training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and consistency in staff/family relationships. This brief report offers valuable insights for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers emphasising the utility of relational approaches when working with families affected by parental mental illness.
{"title":"Socially Oriented Approaches To Working with Children of Parents with Severe and Enduring Mental Illness: Expert Perspectives.","authors":"Imogen Nevard, Helen Brooks, Judith Gellatly, Fritz Handerer, Penny Bee","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01470-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01470-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children Of Parents with severe and enduring Mental Illness (COPMI) face an elevated risk for inherited mental health issues and diminished quality of life across various domains. While social factors such as social networks (the set of active, valued social ties surrounding an individual) are recognised as protective, they are often inadequately conceptualised, preventing effective leverage to promote positive outcomes. This brief report provides information regarding common network related issues faced by families, opportunities for supportive intervention, barriers and facilitators to social network conscious work with COPMI according to professionals. Professionals who work with individuals or families affected by parental mental illness provided insights as to how social network considerations can or do feature in their work via focus group discussions. Focus group transcripts were analysed through an a priori framework developed through framework analysis in order to identify common issues, potential interventions, and barriers and facilitators in their work. Commonly observed issues within family networks included the impact of caring roles, structural limitations to networks, and experiences related to stigma and trust. Network related intervention opportunities included early identification, support for community integration efforts, and child skills building. Barriers included lack of needs identification, communication gaps, and staff workload pressures. Potential facilitators include ongoing training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and consistency in staff/family relationships. This brief report offers valuable insights for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers emphasising the utility of relational approaches when working with families affected by parental mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647304/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01489-2
Sapana R Patel, Virna Little, Samantha Baca, Vanessa Aryee, Lisa B Dixon, Harold Alan Pincus, Roberto Lewis-Fernández
Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we created a depression care decision aid for Latinx and African American individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) at a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers. We surveyed 94 African American and Latinx individuals with MDD about their decision making needs. Focus groups elaborated on these preferences. Results show that about half of the sample preferred a collaborative role in decision making. Respondents report greater preference for receiving information about care compared to lower preferences for shared decision making. Focus group themes included fear of judgment, importance of being informed of care options and exploring care preferences, value of a provider who is a trusted friend and medical expert, and the importance of flexible decision making. Survey and focus groups results were used to iteratively develop a depression care decision aid. Future work will evaluate acceptability, feasibility, and effect of the depression care decision aid.
{"title":"The Development of Stakeholder-Driven and Theory-Informed Depression Care Decision Aid for Ethnoracially Diverse Communities in Primary Care.","authors":"Sapana R Patel, Virna Little, Samantha Baca, Vanessa Aryee, Lisa B Dixon, Harold Alan Pincus, Roberto Lewis-Fernández","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01489-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01489-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we created a depression care decision aid for Latinx and African American individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) at a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers. We surveyed 94 African American and Latinx individuals with MDD about their decision making needs. Focus groups elaborated on these preferences. Results show that about half of the sample preferred a collaborative role in decision making. Respondents report greater preference for receiving information about care compared to lower preferences for shared decision making. Focus group themes included fear of judgment, importance of being informed of care options and exploring care preferences, value of a provider who is a trusted friend and medical expert, and the importance of flexible decision making. Survey and focus groups results were used to iteratively develop a depression care decision aid. Future work will evaluate acceptability, feasibility, and effect of the depression care decision aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1536-1547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145022934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01480-x
Christopher Weatherly, Maryam Abdelghani, Genesis Rebeca Cook, Maryam Irfan, Judy Meirose, Eleni Gaveras, Nicholas Johnson, Kimberly B Roth
Rural communities in the United States (US) are disproportionately burdened with higher suicide rates than non-rural ones, facing structural and cultural barriers that make it less likely for suicidal individuals to obtain help. Community-based interventions have been called for to address the need for integrative approaches relevant to the rural landscape. To facilitate increased adaptation/implementation of rural suicide prevention programming, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to evaluate the state-of-the-science. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched for and identified relevant peer-reviewed literature across four databases, using dual screening/extraction throughout. We extracted information on key article characteristics, program descriptions, and methodological approaches to identify trends, gaps, and emergent themes. 29 articles were included in this review. Studies predominantly focused on suicide prevention for youth, particularly amongst Indigenous communities, with papers also concentrating on medical settings and US veterans. While a wide range of intervention and evaluation approaches were employed, few studies measured clinical outcomes, utilized theoretical frameworks or official rural definitions, or used comprehensive prevention strategies. This review offers investigators a guide to the existing evidence base and growing patterns in the field of suicide prevention in rural US areas. Results highlight the dearth of literature on prevention programming in this much needed yet overlooked area of study. Future intervention research should consider using context-specific rural classifications, relevant clinical outcomes, and comprehensive theory-backed strategies embedded in their approach.
{"title":"Community-based Suicide Interventions in Rural United States: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Christopher Weatherly, Maryam Abdelghani, Genesis Rebeca Cook, Maryam Irfan, Judy Meirose, Eleni Gaveras, Nicholas Johnson, Kimberly B Roth","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01480-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01480-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rural communities in the United States (US) are disproportionately burdened with higher suicide rates than non-rural ones, facing structural and cultural barriers that make it less likely for suicidal individuals to obtain help. Community-based interventions have been called for to address the need for integrative approaches relevant to the rural landscape. To facilitate increased adaptation/implementation of rural suicide prevention programming, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to evaluate the state-of-the-science. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched for and identified relevant peer-reviewed literature across four databases, using dual screening/extraction throughout. We extracted information on key article characteristics, program descriptions, and methodological approaches to identify trends, gaps, and emergent themes. 29 articles were included in this review. Studies predominantly focused on suicide prevention for youth, particularly amongst Indigenous communities, with papers also concentrating on medical settings and US veterans. While a wide range of intervention and evaluation approaches were employed, few studies measured clinical outcomes, utilized theoretical frameworks or official rural definitions, or used comprehensive prevention strategies. This review offers investigators a guide to the existing evidence base and growing patterns in the field of suicide prevention in rural US areas. Results highlight the dearth of literature on prevention programming in this much needed yet overlooked area of study. Future intervention research should consider using context-specific rural classifications, relevant clinical outcomes, and comprehensive theory-backed strategies embedded in their approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1437-1460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647199/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144689130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8
Jamie Fried, Hunter L McQuistion, Jon Marrelli, Melvin C Hampton, Lingwei Wu, Alessandra LeGeros, Olga Lanina, W Gordon Frankle
This study aims to evaluate the quality and potential clinical benefits of a novel program, called the Enhanced Treatment and Recovery (EnTRy) Program, which provides Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) without limits on diagnosis, age, or treatment time to individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). To assess recovery of participants, we compared the baseline Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) National Outcome Measures (NOMs) in patients enrolled in EnTRy to that at 6 months and 12 months. To explore whether EnTRy provided benefits over standard treatment, we compared the time engaged in treatment for the EnTRy cohort with that of a historic sample from the same clinical site. Participants were significantly less likely to have a psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days during follow-up assessment at 6 months (19% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, (χ2 (1, N = 1006) = 91, p<0.0001) and 12 months (16% at baseline, 1% at 12 months, χ2 (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p<0.0001). Participants were similarly less likely to have psychiatric emergency service encounters in the past 30 days at 6 months (18% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, χ2 (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001) and at 12 months (16% at baseline, 2% at 12 months, χ2(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the EnTRy program remained engaged with care for significantly longer than a historical sample (p< 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox logrank) with a logrank hazard ratio of 2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43). Age and diagnosis-unlimited CSC may be particularly effective for individuals with SMI who recently received hospital level care and may help maintain gains in individuals who have aged out of programs dedicated to first episode psychiatric illness.
本研究的目的是评估一个新项目的质量和潜在的临床效益,该项目被称为增强治疗和康复(进入)项目,该项目为患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体提供不受诊断、年龄或治疗时间限制的协调专业护理(CSC)。为了评估参与者的恢复情况,我们比较了入组患者在6个月和12个月时的药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局(SAMSHA)国家结果测量(NOMs)基线。为了探讨入组是否优于标准治疗,我们将入组队列的治疗时间与来自同一临床地点的历史样本的治疗时间进行了比较。在6个月的随访评估中,参与者在过去30天内精神病住院的可能性显著降低(基线时为19%,6个月时为1%,(χ2 (1, N = 1006) = 91, p2 (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p2 (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001)和12个月时(基线时为16%,12个月时为2%,χ2(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001)。入组患者接受护理的时间明显超过历史样本(Mantel-Cox logrank统计p< 0.0001), logrank风险比为2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43)。年龄和诊断——不受限制的CSC可能对最近接受过医院级别护理的重度精神障碍患者特别有效,也可能有助于维持那些因年龄增长而退出首发精神疾病治疗项目的患者的获益。
{"title":"The EnTRy Program: Expanding Coordinated Specialty Care Beyond Early Psychosis.","authors":"Jamie Fried, Hunter L McQuistion, Jon Marrelli, Melvin C Hampton, Lingwei Wu, Alessandra LeGeros, Olga Lanina, W Gordon Frankle","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01491-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the quality and potential clinical benefits of a novel program, called the Enhanced Treatment and Recovery (EnTRy) Program, which provides Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) without limits on diagnosis, age, or treatment time to individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). To assess recovery of participants, we compared the baseline Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) National Outcome Measures (NOMs) in patients enrolled in EnTRy to that at 6 months and 12 months. To explore whether EnTRy provided benefits over standard treatment, we compared the time engaged in treatment for the EnTRy cohort with that of a historic sample from the same clinical site. Participants were significantly less likely to have a psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days during follow-up assessment at 6 months (19% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, (χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1006) = 91, p<0.0001) and 12 months (16% at baseline, 1% at 12 months, χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 486) = 37.633, p<0.0001). Participants were similarly less likely to have psychiatric emergency service encounters in the past 30 days at 6 months (18% at baseline, 1% at 6 months, χ<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1004) = 86.808, p < 0.0001) and at 12 months (16% at baseline, 2% at 12 months, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, N = 486) = 32.387, p= 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the EnTRy program remained engaged with care for significantly longer than a historical sample (p< 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox logrank) with a logrank hazard ratio of 2.0 (CI 1.65- 2.43). Age and diagnosis-unlimited CSC may be particularly effective for individuals with SMI who recently received hospital level care and may help maintain gains in individuals who have aged out of programs dedicated to first episode psychiatric illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1422-1428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01494-5
Alice Palmer, Simon Adamson, Ria Schroder, Lisa Wood
The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) is an eight-item screening tool designed to identify problematic cannabis use. The present study intended to assess the psychometric properties of the measure in a youth sample. N = 76 participants completed the CUDIT-R and a measure of cannabis consumption. All participants underwent an assessment for a current cannabis use disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The CUDIT-R exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.76) and concurrent validity with a cannabis consumption measure. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with an area under the ROC curve of 0.96. The CUDIT-R proved to be a reliable and valid screening tool amongst youth with heavy cannabis use, which suggests the scale has clinical utility.
{"title":"Psychometric Performance of the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test- Revised (CUDIT-R) in an Youth Clinical Sample.","authors":"Alice Palmer, Simon Adamson, Ria Schroder, Lisa Wood","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01494-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01494-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) is an eight-item screening tool designed to identify problematic cannabis use. The present study intended to assess the psychometric properties of the measure in a youth sample. N = 76 participants completed the CUDIT-R and a measure of cannabis consumption. All participants underwent an assessment for a current cannabis use disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The CUDIT-R exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.76) and concurrent validity with a cannabis consumption measure. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with an area under the ROC curve of 0.96. The CUDIT-R proved to be a reliable and valid screening tool amongst youth with heavy cannabis use, which suggests the scale has clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1592-1598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647225/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144689131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1007/s10597-025-01483-8
Donagh Seaver O'Leary, David Marshall, Justin Smyth, Keith Gaynor, Mary Clarke
This study aimed to provide a systematic review of Tai Chi interventions in psychosis and their impact on positive and negative symptoms, cognitive deficits and quality of life. There is growing evidence that the mind-body practice of Tai Chi has value in treating and preventing mental health-related problems, such as stress and anxiety. However, it is unclear whether they are effective or beneficial in serious mental illnesses such as psychosis. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered (PROSPERO). The review examined studies which included adults with diagnosed psychotic disorders who participated in treatment studies examining Tai Chi or Qigong interventions using quantitative measures of positive and negative symptoms, cognitive deficits and quality of life. The search was conducted in August 2024. Data were extracted by two independent researchers and analysed using a narrative synthesis approach. Three-hundred and eighty one papers were screened with six studies included in the final review. Publications spanned from 2012-2022. All studies were based in Asia. Tai Chi interventions were acceptable, and well-tolerated. Outcomes indicated small-medium effective sizes in improving negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. However largely, these improvements were not maintained over time. The current review suggests that Tai Chi is an acceptable, well-tolerated intervention in individuals with long-term psychotic illnesses in Asian populations There is tentative evidence that it may have a positive impact for negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Well-controlled studies should be encouraged in Western settings.
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Tai Chi-based Interventions for Positive and Negative Symptoms, Cognitive Functioning, and Quality of Life in Psychosis.","authors":"Donagh Seaver O'Leary, David Marshall, Justin Smyth, Keith Gaynor, Mary Clarke","doi":"10.1007/s10597-025-01483-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10597-025-01483-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to provide a systematic review of Tai Chi interventions in psychosis and their impact on positive and negative symptoms, cognitive deficits and quality of life. There is growing evidence that the mind-body practice of Tai Chi has value in treating and preventing mental health-related problems, such as stress and anxiety. However, it is unclear whether they are effective or beneficial in serious mental illnesses such as psychosis. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered (PROSPERO). The review examined studies which included adults with diagnosed psychotic disorders who participated in treatment studies examining Tai Chi or Qigong interventions using quantitative measures of positive and negative symptoms, cognitive deficits and quality of life. The search was conducted in August 2024. Data were extracted by two independent researchers and analysed using a narrative synthesis approach. Three-hundred and eighty one papers were screened with six studies included in the final review. Publications spanned from 2012-2022. All studies were based in Asia. Tai Chi interventions were acceptable, and well-tolerated. Outcomes indicated small-medium effective sizes in improving negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. However largely, these improvements were not maintained over time. The current review suggests that Tai Chi is an acceptable, well-tolerated intervention in individuals with long-term psychotic illnesses in Asian populations There is tentative evidence that it may have a positive impact for negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Well-controlled studies should be encouraged in Western settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1481-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12647228/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144674042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}