首页 > 最新文献

Clinical therapeutics最新文献

英文 中文
Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride Cobenfy Xanomeline 和 Trospium Chloride。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.10.001
Paul Beninger MD, MBA
{"title":"Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride","authors":"Paul Beninger MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages 938-939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142496505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Esomeprazole and Magnesium Hydroxide Compared to the Enteric-Coated Esomeprazole 埃索美拉唑和氢氧化镁固定剂量复方制剂的药代动力学和药效学与肠溶埃索美拉唑的比较。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.006
Yoonjin Kim MD , Sungyeun Bae MD , Inseung Jeon PhD , Jihoon Kwon MS , Sung Hee Hong MS , Na Young Kim MS , Kyung-Sang Yu MD, PhD , In-Jin Jang MD, PhD , SeungHwan Lee MD, PhD

Purpose

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antacid salts enables rapid acid suppression through the neutralizing effect of the antacid salt and the rapid absorption of PPIs. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of a recently formulated FDC of esomeprazole and magnesium hydroxide to the enteric-coated esomeprazole in healthy subjects.

Methods

A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover design was conducted in healthy subjects. Forty-nine subjects were randomized to one of the two treatment sequences and received either the test drug (esomeprazole/magnesium hydroxide 40/350 mg) or reference drug (enteric-coated esomeprazole 40 mg) for 7 days in the first period and the alternative in the second period with a 14-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours for PK assessment, and 24-hour gastric pH monitoring was conducted for PD assessment both before and after a single administration, as well as at a steady state after seven consecutive days of administration. The PK and PD parameters were compared between the two drugs.

Findings

After multiple administrations, the median value of time to reach maximum concentration was faster in the test drug than in the reference drug, with a difference of 1.68 hours. The overall systemic exposure of the test drug was similar to that of the reference drug, and the PK parameter fell within the equivalence criteria. The test drug demonstrated a shorter time to reach gastric pH ≥ 4 compared to the reference drug (P = 0.0463). A decrease from baseline in integrated gastric acidity over 24 hours, which represents the degree of inhibition of gastric acid secretion, was equivalent between the two drugs.

Implications

The fixed-dose combination of esomeprazole and magnesium hydroxide showed rapid absorption and quicker gastric acid suppression than enteric-coated esomeprazole with comparable PK and PD properties. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04324905 (https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324905).
目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和抗酸盐的固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)可通过抗酸盐的中和作用和 PPIs 的快速吸收实现快速抑酸。本研究旨在比较最近配制的埃索美拉唑和氢氧化镁 FDC 与肠溶埃索美拉唑在健康受试者中的药代动力学(PKs)和药效学(PDs):在健康受试者中进行了随机、开放标签、多剂量、两种治疗、双向交叉设计。49名受试者被随机分配到两种治疗顺序中的一种,在第一阶段接受试验药物(埃索美拉唑/氢氧化镁 40/350 毫克)或参照药物(肠溶埃索美拉唑 40 毫克)治疗 7 天,在第二阶段接受另一种药物治疗,并有 14 天的冲洗期。在单次给药前和给药后,以及在连续给药七天后的稳定状态下,均采集长达 24 小时的血样进行 PK 评估,并进行 24 小时胃 pH 监测以评估 PD。对两种药物的 PK 和 PD 参数进行了比较:多次给药后,试验药达到最大浓度的时间中值比参照药快,相差 1.68 小时。试验药物的总体全身暴露量与参比药物相似,PK 参数符合等效标准。与参比药物相比,试验药物达到胃 pH ≥ 4 的时间更短(P = 0.0463)。24小时内综合胃酸度从基线开始下降的幅度(代表胃酸分泌的抑制程度)与两种药物相当:意义:埃索美拉唑和氢氧化镁的固定剂量复方制剂与肠溶型埃索美拉唑相比,吸收更快,胃酸抑制更快,PK 和 PD 特性相当:NCT04324905(https://classic.Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT04324905)。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Esomeprazole and Magnesium Hydroxide Compared to the Enteric-Coated Esomeprazole","authors":"Yoonjin Kim MD ,&nbsp;Sungyeun Bae MD ,&nbsp;Inseung Jeon PhD ,&nbsp;Jihoon Kwon MS ,&nbsp;Sung Hee Hong MS ,&nbsp;Na Young Kim MS ,&nbsp;Kyung-Sang Yu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;In-Jin Jang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;SeungHwan Lee MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antacid salts enables rapid acid suppression through the neutralizing effect of the antacid salt and the rapid absorption of PPIs. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of a recently formulated FDC of esomeprazole and magnesium hydroxide to the enteric-coated esomeprazole in healthy subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover design was conducted in healthy subjects. Forty-nine subjects were randomized to one of the two treatment sequences and received either the test drug (esomeprazole/magnesium hydroxide 40/350 mg) or reference drug (enteric-coated esomeprazole 40 mg) for 7 days in the first period and the alternative in the second period with a 14-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours for PK assessment, and 24-hour gastric pH monitoring was conducted for PD assessment both before and after a single administration, as well as at a steady state after seven consecutive days of administration. The PK and PD parameters were compared between the two drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>After multiple administrations, the median value of time to reach maximum concentration was faster in the test drug than in the reference drug, with a difference of 1.68 hours. The overall systemic exposure of the test drug was similar to that of the reference drug, and the PK parameter fell within the equivalence criteria. The test drug demonstrated a shorter time to reach gastric pH ≥ 4 compared to the reference drug (<em>P</em> = 0.0463). A decrease from baseline in integrated gastric acidity over 24 hours, which represents the degree of inhibition of gastric acid secretion, was equivalent between the two drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>The fixed-dose combination of esomeprazole and magnesium hydroxide showed rapid absorption and quicker gastric acid suppression than enteric-coated esomeprazole with comparable PK and PD properties. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04324905 (<span><span>https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324905</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages 870-876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142281584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-Effectiveness of Zanubrutinib Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 在未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中,扎鲁替尼与本达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗的成本效益对比。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.016
Jing Nie PhD , Lihui Liu MD , Huina Wu MD , Shan Yuan MD , Ke Tang BS , Jiyong Wu PhD

Purpose

Zanubrutinib, a potent and specific irreversible Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has proven to be effective in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), whether used alone or in combination with other therapies. Here, we compared the cost-effectiveness of zanubrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab (R-bendamustine) to determine its effectiveness as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients with untreated CLL.

Methods

The evaluation utilized a partitioned survival model, constructed using TreeAge Pro 2011 software, incorporating data from SEQUOIA trial (NCT03336333). Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in trials using parametric survival modeling. In this analysis, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and lifetime cost were calculated from the Chinese health care system perspective. Sensitivity analyses, including 1-way analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were carried out to explore the uncertainty of the modeling results. Additionally, several scenario analyses, including different zanubrutinib price calculation and 20-year time horizon, were evaluated.

Findings

The findings revealed that zanubrutinib had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $58,258.18 per additional QALYs gained compared with bendamustine-rituximab, with zanubrutinib being cost-effective only if its price was reduced by more than 30%. Research indicated that zanubrutinib achieved at least a 3.70% probability of cost-effectiveness at the threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressed disease.

Implications

The study highlighted the importance of considering the cost-effectiveness of zanubrutinib at its current price point for patients with untreated CLL in China, emphasizing the need for further assessment and potential pricing adjustments to enhance its economic viability in clinical practice.
目的:扎鲁替尼是一种强效、特异性不可逆的布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,已被证明对未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)有效,无论是单独使用还是与其他疗法联合使用。在此,我们比较了扎努鲁替尼与苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗(R-苯达莫司汀)的成本效益,以确定其作为中国未治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者一线治疗的有效性:评估采用了TreeAge Pro 2011软件构建的分区生存模型,并纳入了SEQUOIA试验(NCT03336333)的数据。根据试验报告的生存概率,利用参数生存模型估算过渡概率。在本分析中,质量调整生命年(QALYs)、增量成本效益比和终生成本均从中国医疗保健系统的角度进行计算。为了探索建模结果的不确定性,我们进行了敏感性分析,包括单向分析和概率敏感性分析。此外,还评估了几种情景分析,包括不同的扎鲁替尼价格计算方法和 20 年的时间跨度:研究结果显示,与苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗相比,扎努布替尼每增加一个QALYs的增量成本效益比为58,258.18美元,只有当扎努布替尼的价格下降30%以上时才具有成本效益。研究表明,在 38,223.34 美元/QALY 的临界值下,扎努布替尼至少有 3.70% 的概率具有成本效益。单向敏感性分析显示,结果对疾病进展的效用很敏感:该研究强调了考虑扎鲁替尼在当前价位对中国未经治疗的CLL患者的成本效益的重要性,强调了进一步评估和潜在定价调整的必要性,以提高其在临床实践中的经济可行性。
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Zanubrutinib Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia","authors":"Jing Nie PhD ,&nbsp;Lihui Liu MD ,&nbsp;Huina Wu MD ,&nbsp;Shan Yuan MD ,&nbsp;Ke Tang BS ,&nbsp;Jiyong Wu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Zanubrutinib, a potent and specific irreversible Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has proven to be effective in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), whether used alone or in combination with other therapies. Here, we compared the cost-effectiveness of zanubrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab (R-bendamustine) to determine its effectiveness as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients with untreated CLL.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The evaluation utilized a partitioned survival model, constructed using TreeAge Pro 2011 software, incorporating data from SEQUOIA trial (NCT03336333). Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in trials using parametric survival modeling. In this analysis, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and lifetime cost were calculated from the Chinese health care system perspective. Sensitivity analyses, including 1-way analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were carried out to explore the uncertainty of the modeling results. Additionally, several scenario analyses, including different zanubrutinib price calculation and 20-year time horizon, were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The findings revealed that zanubrutinib had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $58,258.18 per additional QALYs gained compared with bendamustine-rituximab, with zanubrutinib being cost-effective only if its price was reduced by more than 30%. Research indicated that zanubrutinib achieved at least a 3.70% probability of cost-effectiveness at the threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressed disease.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>The study highlighted the importance of considering the cost-effectiveness of zanubrutinib at its current price point for patients with untreated CLL in China, emphasizing the need for further assessment and potential pricing adjustments to enhance its economic viability in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages 877-882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142281580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SGLT2 Inhibitors, but Not GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, Reduce Incidence of Gout in People Living With Type 2 Diabetes Across the Therapeutic Spectrum SGLT2抑制剂(而非GLP-1受体激动剂)可降低整个治疗范围内2型糖尿病患者的痛风发病率。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.021
Frank G. Preston , Matthew Anson , David R. Riley , Gema H. Ibarburu , Alexander Henney , Gregory Y.H. Lip , Daniel J. Cuthbertson , Uazman Alam , Sizheng S. Zhao

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the relative association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) with the incidence of gout in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using real-world data.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study using data from TriNetX (an international federated database). We included patients commenced on metformin or insulin, either alone or with an SGLT2i or GLP-1Ra, at least 2 years prior to date of analysis. We propensity score matched (PSM) (1:1) for 26 relevant characteristics. Time to event analysis was performed to assess the incidence of gout, all-cause mortality (positive control), and herpes zoster infection (negative control) at 5 years following drug initiation.

Findings

Prior to PSM, the cohort numbers were as follows: metformin control, 1,111,449; SGLT2i with metformin, 101,706; GLP-1Ra with metformin, 110,180, insulin control, 1,398,066; SGLT2i with insulin, 68,697; and GLP-1Ra with insulin, 99,693. SGLT2i with metformin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the metformin control cohort (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.82], P < 0.0001). Similarly, SGLT2i with insulin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the insulin control cohort (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.74–0.92], P < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant disparity in gout incidence was observed between the use of GLP-1Ra and matched controls. Subgroup analysis showed an associated reduced incidence of gout with SGLT2i use compared to GLP-1Ra, in groups using metformin (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.70-0.86], P < 0.0001) or insulin (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91)], P < 0.0001).

Implications

In this large-scale real-world study, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower incidence of gout in patients with T2D compared to both insulin and metformin controls. These findings suggest the potential of SGLT2i as a promising therapeutic option for treating gout in this population.
目的:本研究旨在利用真实世界的数据,评估钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1Ra)与2型糖尿病(T2D)患者痛风发病率之间的相关性:我们利用 TriNetX(国际联合数据库)的数据开展了一项队列研究。我们纳入了在分析日期前至少 2 年开始使用二甲双胍或胰岛素(无论是单独使用还是与 SGLT2i 或 GLP-1Ra 一起使用)的患者。我们对 26 个相关特征进行了倾向评分匹配 (PSM)(1:1)。我们进行了事件发生时间分析,以评估用药 5 年后痛风、全因死亡率(阳性对照)和带状疱疹感染(阴性对照)的发生率:在 PSM 之前,队列人数如下:二甲双胍对照组 1,111,449 人;SGLT2i 联合二甲双胍 101,706 人;GLP-1Ra 联合二甲双胍 110,180 人;胰岛素对照组 1,398,066 人;SGLT2i 联合胰岛素 68,697 人;GLP-1Ra 联合胰岛素 99,693 人。与二甲双胍对照组相比,SGLT2i 联合二甲双胍治疗 5 年后痛风发病率明显降低(HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.82],P < 0.0001)。同样,与胰岛素对照组相比,SGLT2i 联合胰岛素治疗 5 年后痛风发病率也有显著统计学下降(HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.92],P < 0.0001)。相反,使用 GLP-1Ra 和匹配对照组之间的痛风发病率没有明显差异。亚组分析显示,在使用二甲双胍(HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.70-0.86],P < 0.0001)或胰岛素(HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91],P < 0.0001)的组别中,与 GLP-1Ra 相比,使用 SGLT2i 可降低痛风的发病率:在这项大规模真实世界研究中,与胰岛素和二甲双胍对照组相比,使用SGLT2i可降低T2D患者的痛风发病率。这些研究结果表明,SGLT2i 有可能成为治疗这类人群痛风的一种有前途的治疗选择。
{"title":"SGLT2 Inhibitors, but Not GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, Reduce Incidence of Gout in People Living With Type 2 Diabetes Across the Therapeutic Spectrum","authors":"Frank G. Preston ,&nbsp;Matthew Anson ,&nbsp;David R. Riley ,&nbsp;Gema H. Ibarburu ,&nbsp;Alexander Henney ,&nbsp;Gregory Y.H. Lip ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Cuthbertson ,&nbsp;Uazman Alam ,&nbsp;Sizheng S. Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the relative association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) with the incidence of gout in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using real-world data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cohort study using data from TriNetX (an international federated database). We included patients commenced on metformin or insulin, either alone or with an SGLT2i or GLP-1Ra, at least 2 years prior to date of analysis. We propensity score matched (PSM) (1:1) for 26 relevant characteristics. Time to event analysis was performed to assess the incidence of gout, all-cause mortality (positive control), and herpes zoster infection (negative control) at 5 years following drug initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Prior to PSM, the cohort numbers were as follows: metformin control, 1,111,449; SGLT2i with metformin, 101,706; GLP-1Ra with metformin, 110,180, insulin control, 1,398,066; SGLT2i with insulin, 68,697; and GLP-1Ra with insulin, 99,693. SGLT2i with metformin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the metformin control cohort (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.82], <em>P &lt;</em> 0<em>.</em>0001). Similarly, SGLT2i with insulin demonstrated a statistically significant decreased incidence of gout at 5 years compared to the insulin control cohort (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.74–0.92], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Conversely, no significant disparity in gout incidence was observed between the use of GLP-1Ra and matched controls. Subgroup analysis showed an associated reduced incidence of gout with SGLT2i use compared to GLP-1Ra, in groups using metformin (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.70-0.86], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) or insulin (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91)], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>In this large-scale real-world study, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower incidence of gout in patients with T2D compared to both insulin and metformin controls. These findings suggest the potential of SGLT2i as a promising therapeutic option for treating gout in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages 835-840"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141787522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Leronlimab in Mild-To-Moderate COVID-19 Leronlimab治疗轻度至中度COVID-19的随机安慰剂对照试验。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.019
Harish Seethamraju MD , Otto O. Yang MD , Richard Loftus MD , Onyema Ogbuagu MD , Daniel Sammartino MD , Ali Mansour MD , Jonah B. Sacha PhD , Sohita Ojha PhD , Scott G. Hansen PhD , Arvin Cyrus Arman PhD , Jacob P. Lalezari MD
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Early in the course of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic it was hypothesised that host genetics played a role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 including a suggestion that the CCR5-Δ32 mutation may be protective in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Leronlimab is an investigational CCR5-specific humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody currently in development for HIV-1 infection. We aimed to explore the impact of leronlimab on the severity of disease symptoms among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The TEMPEST trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous leronlimab (700 mg) or placebo on days 0 and 7. The primary efficacy endpoint was assessed by change in total symptom score based on fever, myalgia, dyspnea, and cough, at end of treatment (day 14).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Overall, 84 participants were randomized and treated with leronlimab (n = 56) or placebo (n = 28). No difference was observed in change in total symptom score (<em>P</em> = 0.8184) or other pre-specified secondary endpoints between treatments. However, in a <em>post hoc</em> analysis, 50.0% of participants treated with leronlimab demonstrated improvements from baseline in National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) at day 14, compared with 20·8% of participants in the placebo group (<em>post hoc; p</em> = 0.0223). Among participants in this trial with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adverse events rates were numerically but not statistically significantly lower in leronlimab participants (33.9%) compared with placebo participants (50.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>At the time the TEMPEST trial was designed although CCR5 was known to be implicated in COVID-19 disease severity the exact pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection was poorly understood. Today it is well accepted that SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic-to-mild cases is primarily characterized by viral replication, with a heightened immune response, accompanied by diminished viral replication in moderate-to-severe disease and a peak in inflammatory responses with excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in critical disease. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that no differences between treatments were observed in the primary endpoint or in pre-specified secondary endpoints among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, the results of the exploratory <em>post hoc</em> analysis showing that participants in the leronlimab group had greater improvement in NEWS2 assessment compared to placebo provided a suggestion that leronlimab may be associated with a lower likelihood of people with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 progressing to more severe disease and needs to be confirmed in other appropriately designed clinical trials.</div><div>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04343651 <span><span>https://classi
目的:在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的早期,有一种假设认为宿主基因在 COVID-19 的病理生理学中起了一定作用,包括 CCR5-Δ32 突变可能对 SARS-CoV-2 感染具有保护作用。Leronlimab是一种正在研究中的CCR5特异性人源化IgG4单克隆抗体,目前正在开发用于治疗HIV-1感染。我们旨在探讨来龙利单抗对轻度至中度 COVID-19 感染者疾病症状严重程度的影响:TEMPEST试验是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,研究对象为轻度至中度COVID-19患者。参与者按2:1的比例随机分配在第0天和第7天接受皮下注射来龙利单抗(700毫克)或安慰剂。主要疗效终点根据治疗结束时(第14天)发热、肌痛、呼吸困难和咳嗽等症状总分的变化进行评估:共有84名参与者接受了随机治疗,其中56人接受了来龙利单抗治疗,28人接受了安慰剂治疗。在总症状评分变化(P = 0.8184)或其他预先指定的次要终点方面,未观察到不同治疗之间存在差异。然而,在一项事后分析中,50.0%接受来龙利单抗治疗的参与者在第14天时的全国预警评分2(NEWS2)比基线有所改善,而安慰剂组中只有20-8%的参与者有所改善(事后分析;P = 0.0223)。在该试验的参与者中,轻度至中度 COVID-19 不良事件的发生率在数量上低于安慰剂参与者(50.0%),但在统计学上并无显著差异:在设计 TEMPEST 试验时,虽然人们知道 CCR5 与 COVID-19 疾病的严重程度有关,但对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的确切病理生理学却知之甚少。如今,人们普遍认为,SARS-CoV-2 感染在无症状到轻度病例中主要表现为病毒复制,免疫反应增强,中重度病例中病毒复制减少,重症病例中炎症反应达到高峰,促炎症细胞因子分泌过多。因此,在轻度至中度 COVID-19 患者的主要终点或预先指定的次要终点中未观察到不同治疗方法之间的差异,也许并不令人惊讶。然而,探索性事后分析结果显示,与安慰剂相比,来龙利单抗组参与者的NEWS2评估结果改善更大,这表明来龙利单抗可能会降低轻度至中度COVID-19患者发展为更严重疾病的可能性,这需要在其他适当设计的临床试验中得到证实。Clinicaltrials: gov number, NCT04343651 https://classic.Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT04343651。
{"title":"A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Leronlimab in Mild-To-Moderate COVID-19","authors":"Harish Seethamraju MD ,&nbsp;Otto O. Yang MD ,&nbsp;Richard Loftus MD ,&nbsp;Onyema Ogbuagu MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Sammartino MD ,&nbsp;Ali Mansour MD ,&nbsp;Jonah B. Sacha PhD ,&nbsp;Sohita Ojha PhD ,&nbsp;Scott G. Hansen PhD ,&nbsp;Arvin Cyrus Arman PhD ,&nbsp;Jacob P. Lalezari MD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Early in the course of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic it was hypothesised that host genetics played a role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 including a suggestion that the CCR5-Δ32 mutation may be protective in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Leronlimab is an investigational CCR5-specific humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody currently in development for HIV-1 infection. We aimed to explore the impact of leronlimab on the severity of disease symptoms among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The TEMPEST trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous leronlimab (700 mg) or placebo on days 0 and 7. The primary efficacy endpoint was assessed by change in total symptom score based on fever, myalgia, dyspnea, and cough, at end of treatment (day 14).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Findings&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Overall, 84 participants were randomized and treated with leronlimab (n = 56) or placebo (n = 28). No difference was observed in change in total symptom score (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = 0.8184) or other pre-specified secondary endpoints between treatments. However, in a &lt;em&gt;post hoc&lt;/em&gt; analysis, 50.0% of participants treated with leronlimab demonstrated improvements from baseline in National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) at day 14, compared with 20·8% of participants in the placebo group (&lt;em&gt;post hoc; p&lt;/em&gt; = 0.0223). Among participants in this trial with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adverse events rates were numerically but not statistically significantly lower in leronlimab participants (33.9%) compared with placebo participants (50.0%).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Implications&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;At the time the TEMPEST trial was designed although CCR5 was known to be implicated in COVID-19 disease severity the exact pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection was poorly understood. Today it is well accepted that SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic-to-mild cases is primarily characterized by viral replication, with a heightened immune response, accompanied by diminished viral replication in moderate-to-severe disease and a peak in inflammatory responses with excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in critical disease. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that no differences between treatments were observed in the primary endpoint or in pre-specified secondary endpoints among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, the results of the exploratory &lt;em&gt;post hoc&lt;/em&gt; analysis showing that participants in the leronlimab group had greater improvement in NEWS2 assessment compared to placebo provided a suggestion that leronlimab may be associated with a lower likelihood of people with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 progressing to more severe disease and needs to be confirmed in other appropriately designed clinical trials.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04343651 &lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;https://classi","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages 891-899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extraglycemic Effects of SGLT2i/GLP1-ra: A Topic Update SGLT2/GLP-1 的血糖外效应:最新话题。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.10.005
Uazman Alam BSc, MPHe, FRCP, PhD
{"title":"Extraglycemic Effects of SGLT2i/GLP1-ra: A Topic Update","authors":"Uazman Alam BSc, MPHe, FRCP, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages 826-827"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Budget Impact Analysis of Dapagliflozin in Treating Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction From the Perspective of Malaysian Public Healthcare System 从马来西亚公共医疗系统的角度分析达帕格列净治疗射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的预算影响
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.008
Yi Jing Tan MPharm, MSc , Joo Zheng Low MSc , Siew Chin Ong PhD

Purpose

This is a budget impact analysis that compared the scenario of treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using dapagliflozin plus standard of care (SoC) versus a scenario without dapagliflozin, from the perspective of Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia over a 5-year time horizon.

Methods

A Microsoft Excel-based cost calculator was developed for such comparison. The estimated size of eligible population, uptake rates for dapagliflozin, as well as costs related to drugs, clinical events, and adverse events were based on published data, official tariffs, and databases, and expert opinion. Clinical data from the DAPA-HF trial were used to inform efficacy and safety inputs (i.e., hospitalization for heart failure (hHF), cardiovascular death, and adverse events). Results were reported as total annual and cumulative costs (in 2023 Malaysian Ringgits [RM], United States Dollars [USD], and European Union Euros, [EUR]; with exchange rates of 1 USD = RM 4.40 and 1 EUR = RM 4.90]), as well as the number of clinical events. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted.

Findings

The base-case analysis estimated that over a five-year period, the adoption of dapagliflozin for HFrEF treatment would result in a cumulative cost-saving of RM 2.6 million (USD 0.6 million/EUR 0.5 million), representing a 0.3% reduction in costs, driven primarily by reduced expenditure on hHF. Moreover, dapagliflozin treatment would lead to 731 fewer hHF and 366 fewer cardiovascular deaths. Sensitivity and scenario analyses revealed that the results were most sensitive to assumptions regarding loop diuretic requirements and the cost of dapagliflozin. Although cost savings or a net-zero balance were projected for the first four years, an anticipated 2.5% annual increase in dapagliflozin uptake in the longer term would lead to additional costs for the MOH, starting from the fifth year.

Implications

Incorporating dapagliflozin into the SoC can improve health outcomes for HFrEF patients and may generate cost savings, potentially easing the economic strain of HFrEF management on Malaysia's public healthcare system in the short term. Nonetheless, a modest increase in budget should be anticipated as more patients gain access to the treatment over time.
这是一项预算影响分析,从马来西亚卫生部(MOH)的角度出发,比较了使用达帕格列净加标准护理(SoC)治疗射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)与不使用达帕格列净治疗的方案,时间跨度为 5 年。为进行这种比较,我们开发了一个基于 Microsoft Excel 的成本计算器。符合条件人群的估计规模、达帕格列净的服用率以及与药物、临床事件和不良事件相关的成本均基于已公布的数据、官方关税和数据库以及专家意见。DAPA-HF试验的临床数据被用于疗效和安全性输入(即心力衰竭住院(hHF)、心血管死亡和不良事件)。结果以年度和累计总成本(以 2023 年马来西亚林吉特、美元和欧盟欧元计算;汇率为 1 美元 = 4.40 林吉特和 1 欧元 = 4.90 林吉特)以及临床事件数量进行报告。此外,还进行了敏感性分析和情景分析。基本情况分析估计,在五年时间内,采用达帕格列净治疗 HFrEF 将累计节省成本 260 万马币(60 万美元/50 万欧元),成本降低 0.3%,主要是由于减少了对 HHF 的支出。此外,达帕格列净治疗可减少 731 例高血压和 366 例心血管死亡。敏感性分析和情景分析表明,研究结果对襻利尿剂需求和达帕格列净成本的假设最为敏感。虽然预计前四年可节约成本或实现净零结余,但从长远来看,达帕格列净的使用率预计每年增加 2.5%,这将从第五年开始增加卫生部的成本。将达帕格列净纳入 SoC 可以改善 HFrEF 患者的健康状况,并可能节约成本,从而在短期内减轻 HFrEF 管理对马来西亚公共医疗系统造成的经济压力。尽管如此,随着时间的推移,越来越多的患者接受治疗,预计预算会略有增加。
{"title":"Budget Impact Analysis of Dapagliflozin in Treating Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction From the Perspective of Malaysian Public Healthcare System","authors":"Yi Jing Tan MPharm, MSc ,&nbsp;Joo Zheng Low MSc ,&nbsp;Siew Chin Ong PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This is a budget impact analysis that compared the scenario of treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using dapagliflozin plus standard of care (SoC) versus a scenario without dapagliflozin, from the perspective of Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia over a 5-year time horizon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Microsoft Excel-based cost calculator was developed for such comparison. The estimated size of eligible population, uptake rates for dapagliflozin, as well as costs related to drugs, clinical events, and adverse events were based on published data, official tariffs, and databases, and expert opinion. Clinical data from the DAPA-HF trial were used to inform efficacy and safety inputs (i.e., hospitalization for heart failure (hHF), cardiovascular death, and adverse events). Results were reported as total annual and cumulative costs (in 2023 Malaysian Ringgits [RM], United States Dollars [USD], and European Union Euros, [EUR]; with exchange rates of 1 USD = RM 4.40 and 1 EUR = RM 4.90]), as well as the number of clinical events. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The base-case analysis estimated that over a five-year period, the adoption of dapagliflozin for HFrEF treatment would result in a cumulative cost-saving of RM 2.6 million (USD 0.6 million/EUR 0.5 million), representing a 0.3% reduction in costs, driven primarily by reduced expenditure on hHF. Moreover, dapagliflozin treatment would lead to 731 fewer hHF and 366 fewer cardiovascular deaths. Sensitivity and scenario analyses revealed that the results were most sensitive to assumptions regarding loop diuretic requirements and the cost of dapagliflozin. Although cost savings or a net-zero balance were projected for the first four years, an anticipated 2.5% annual increase in dapagliflozin uptake in the longer term would lead to additional costs for the MOH, starting from the fifth year.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Incorporating dapagliflozin into the SoC can improve health outcomes for HFrEF patients and may generate cost savings, potentially easing the economic strain of HFrEF management on Malaysia's public healthcare system in the short term. Nonetheless, a modest increase in budget should be anticipated as more patients gain access to the treatment over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142250403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Update on an Anti-Alzheimer Drug Candidate CT1812: A Sigma-2 Receptor Antagonist 抗阿尔茨海默氏症候选药物 CT1812 的临床最新进展:Sigma-2 受体拮抗剂。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.013
Guramrit Kaur B.Pharm, Zahid Ahmad Dar M.Pharm, Ankit Bajpai M.Pharm, Ranjit Singh PhD, Ranju Bansal PhD

Purpose

This review article summarizes the progress and latest findings related to the investigational drug candidate CT1812, which is currently in phase 2 clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The article outlines the development of this promising molecule and provides insights into its mechanism of action as sigma-2 receptor (S2R) antagonist along with the positive outcomes of various clinical trials. Literature mentioning AD therapeutics that specifically target amyloid-beta (Aβ) oligomers is limited even though these oligomers are established as the most neurotoxic forms of the Aβ protein. This timely article highlights the potential of CT1812 as a breakthrough in AD therapeutics, providing a new avenue for addressing the neurotoxic forms of Aβ and advancing the field toward a potential cure for AD.

Methods

The literature includes articles searched from PubMed and Google Scholar along with a comprehensive discussion of all the clinical research trials undertaken for CT1812. The review includes 12 clinical trials; of the total citations identified, 10 have been used to support the results of published trials.

Findings

The positive outcomes in the multiple clinical trials conducted on CT1812 indicate the emergence of an effective and promising drug candidate for AD. The article mentions a gap in the literature regarding AD therapeutics specifically targeting Aβ oligomers, which reveals lack of established treatments addressing Aβ oligomers, making the novel approach of CT1812 noteworthy.

Implications

Clinical treatments available today provide symptomatic relief, however, any drug providing a potential cure for AD remains an unanswered question. S2Rs mediated oligomer binding in addition to synaptic toxicity suggest the potential usefulness of CT1812 in AD treatment. Efficacy and safety of CT1812 in further clinical trials could represent a significant advancement in the field, offering a potential treatment that goes beyond the symptomatic relief and aimed at addressing the core mechanisms associated with AD.
目的:这篇综述文章概述了候选药物 CT1812 的研究进展和最新发现。文章概述了这一前景广阔的分子的开发过程,并深入分析了它作为sigma-2受体(S2R)拮抗剂的作用机制以及各种临床试验的积极成果。尽管淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)寡聚体已被确定为神经毒性最强的Aβ蛋白形式,但提及专门针对淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)寡聚体的AD疗法的文献却很有限。这篇文章适时地强调了 CT1812 作为 AD 疗法突破口的潜力,为解决 Aβ 的神经毒性形式提供了一条新途径,并推动该领域向可能治愈 AD 的方向发展:文献包括从PubMed和谷歌学术搜索到的文章,以及对CT1812进行的所有临床研究试验的全面讨论。综述包括 12 项临床试验;在已确定的总引用中,有 10 项用于支持已发表的试验结果:研究结果:CT1812在多项临床试验中取得的积极成果表明,它是一种治疗AD的有效且前景广阔的候选药物。文章提到了有关专门针对Aβ寡聚体的AD治疗药物的文献空白,这表明缺乏针对Aβ寡聚体的成熟治疗方法,因此CT1812的新方法值得关注:目前的临床治疗可缓解症状,但任何药物都有可能治愈AD,这仍是一个未解之谜。除了突触毒性外,S2Rs 介导的寡聚体结合也表明 CT1812 在治疗注意力缺失症方面具有潜在用途。CT1812在进一步临床试验中的有效性和安全性可能代表着该领域的重大进展,它提供了一种超越症状缓解的潜在治疗方法,旨在解决与AD相关的核心机制问题。
{"title":"Clinical Update on an Anti-Alzheimer Drug Candidate CT1812: A Sigma-2 Receptor Antagonist","authors":"Guramrit Kaur B.Pharm,&nbsp;Zahid Ahmad Dar M.Pharm,&nbsp;Ankit Bajpai M.Pharm,&nbsp;Ranjit Singh PhD,&nbsp;Ranju Bansal PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This review article summarizes the progress and latest findings related to the investigational drug candidate CT1812, which is currently in phase 2 clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The article outlines the development of this promising molecule and provides insights into its mechanism of action as sigma-2 receptor (S2R) antagonist along with the positive outcomes of various clinical trials. Literature mentioning AD therapeutics that specifically target amyloid-beta (Aβ) oligomers is limited even though these oligomers are established as the most neurotoxic forms of the Aβ protein. This timely article highlights the potential of CT1812 as a breakthrough in AD therapeutics, providing a new avenue for addressing the neurotoxic forms of Aβ and advancing the field toward a potential cure for AD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The literature includes articles searched from PubMed and Google Scholar along with a comprehensive discussion of all the clinical research trials undertaken for CT1812. The review includes 12 clinical trials; of the total citations identified, 10 have been used to support the results of published trials.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The positive outcomes in the multiple clinical trials conducted on CT1812 indicate the emergence of an effective and promising drug candidate for AD. The article mentions a gap in the literature regarding AD therapeutics specifically targeting Aβ oligomers, which reveals lack of established treatments addressing Aβ oligomers, making the novel approach of CT1812 noteworthy.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Clinical treatments available today provide symptomatic relief, however, any drug providing a potential cure for AD remains an unanswered question. S2Rs mediated oligomer binding in addition to synaptic toxicity suggest the potential usefulness of CT1812 in AD treatment. Efficacy and safety of CT1812 in further clinical trials could represent a significant advancement in the field, offering a potential treatment that goes beyond the symptomatic relief and aimed at addressing the core mechanisms associated with AD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 11","pages":"Pages e21-e28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142281579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of Remimazolam on Preventing Adverse Reactions Caused by Carboprost Tromethamine During Cesarean Section. 雷马唑仑对预防剖宫产术中由卡前列素氨基丁三醇引起的不良反应的效果
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.020
Jianjun Fan, Zhiguo Zhang, Jie Wang, Dianwei Han, Yongbo Zhen, Jinpei Fan, Shuai Wang, Fei Wang

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of remimazolam in preventing adverse reactions triggered by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section procedures.

Methods: A total of 200 parturients scheduled for cesarean sections at risk of postpartum hemorrhage in our hospital from October 2022 to July 2023 were included. The participants were assigned via random number table method to either a study group or a control group, resulting in 100 cases in each. All parturients received combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) during cesarean section, followed by administration of carboprost tromethamine (250 µg) for preventing postpartum hemorrhage after childbirth. CSEA was performed with 1.8 to 2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 7 to 10 mL of 2% lidocaine. The study group was given remimazolam via intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.3 mg/kg/h commencing at 1 minute prior to CSEA and concluding with a final dosage adjustment 20 minutes preceding the end of surgery, while the control group was given the same volume of saline within this time frame. Primary outcome measures were adverse reactions and sedative effects of the parturients.

Findings: Nausea and vomiting were the only adverse reactions that exhibited significant differences between groups. The study group reported significantly fewer cases (32 cases) of nausea and vomiting when compared to the 48 cases observed in the control group. Moreover, the use of remimazolam appeared to alleviate the severity of nausea and vomiting, as evidenced by the significantly lower incidence of Grade III event and the higher risk of Grade I event in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05). The Apgar scores of newborns at birth and 5 minutes after birth were compared, and no statistically significant difference was found (P > 0.05). Parturients receiving remimazolam exhibited better effective sedation outcomes and were more satisfied with the treatment when compared with controls (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postpartum bleeding volume at 2 and 12 hours postpartum, as well as in the duration of postpartum bleeding between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Implications: Intravenous administration of remimazolam effectively prevents adverse reactions induced by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section performed under CSEA, thereby improving sedative effects.

目的:评估雷马唑仑对预防剖宫产术中卡前列素氨基丁三醇引发不良反应的有效性:方法:选取 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 7 月期间在我院接受剖宫产手术且有产后出血风险的 200 名产妇作为研究对象。通过随机数字表法将参与者分配到研究组或对照组,每组 100 例。所有产妇均在剖宫产术中接受脊柱和硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA),然后服用卡前列素氨基丁三醇(250 µg)以预防产后出血。CSEA 用 1.8 至 2 毫升 0.5% 布比卡因和 7 至 10 毫升 2% 利多卡因进行。研究组从 CSEA 开始前 1 分钟开始以 0.3 mg/kg/h 的速度静脉输注瑞马唑仑,最后在手术结束前 20 分钟调整剂量,而对照组则在这段时间内输注相同剂量的生理盐水。主要结果指标为产妇的不良反应和镇静效果:研究结果:恶心和呕吐是两组间唯一存在显著差异的不良反应。研究组报告的恶心和呕吐病例(32 例)明显少于对照组的 48 例。此外,与对照组相比,研究组的 III 级事件发生率明显降低,而 I 级事件风险较高(P < 0.05),这表明使用雷马唑仑似乎减轻了恶心和呕吐的严重程度。比较了新生儿出生时和出生后 5 分钟的阿普加评分,未发现统计学上的显著差异(P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,接受雷马唑仑治疗的产妇镇静效果更好,对治疗的满意度更高(P < 0.05)。两组产妇产后2小时和12小时的出血量以及产后出血持续时间无明显差异(P > 0.05):意义:在 CSEA 下进行剖宫产术时,静脉注射雷马唑仑可有效预防卡前列素氨基丁三醇引起的不良反应,从而改善镇静效果。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Remimazolam on Preventing Adverse Reactions Caused by Carboprost Tromethamine During Cesarean Section.","authors":"Jianjun Fan, Zhiguo Zhang, Jie Wang, Dianwei Han, Yongbo Zhen, Jinpei Fan, Shuai Wang, Fei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of remimazolam in preventing adverse reactions triggered by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 parturients scheduled for cesarean sections at risk of postpartum hemorrhage in our hospital from October 2022 to July 2023 were included. The participants were assigned via random number table method to either a study group or a control group, resulting in 100 cases in each. All parturients received combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) during cesarean section, followed by administration of carboprost tromethamine (250 µg) for preventing postpartum hemorrhage after childbirth. CSEA was performed with 1.8 to 2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 7 to 10 mL of 2% lidocaine. The study group was given remimazolam via intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.3 mg/kg/h commencing at 1 minute prior to CSEA and concluding with a final dosage adjustment 20 minutes preceding the end of surgery, while the control group was given the same volume of saline within this time frame. Primary outcome measures were adverse reactions and sedative effects of the parturients.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nausea and vomiting were the only adverse reactions that exhibited significant differences between groups. The study group reported significantly fewer cases (32 cases) of nausea and vomiting when compared to the 48 cases observed in the control group. Moreover, the use of remimazolam appeared to alleviate the severity of nausea and vomiting, as evidenced by the significantly lower incidence of Grade III event and the higher risk of Grade I event in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05). The Apgar scores of newborns at birth and 5 minutes after birth were compared, and no statistically significant difference was found (P > 0.05). Parturients receiving remimazolam exhibited better effective sedation outcomes and were more satisfied with the treatment when compared with controls (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postpartum bleeding volume at 2 and 12 hours postpartum, as well as in the duration of postpartum bleeding between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Intravenous administration of remimazolam effectively prevents adverse reactions induced by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section performed under CSEA, thereby improving sedative effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medical Cannabis Dosing Trajectories of Patients: Evidence From Sales Data. 医用大麻患者的用药轨迹:来自销售数据的证据。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.004
Alexandra F Kritikos, Myfanwy Graham, Dominic Hodgkin, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula

Purpose: Medical cannabis use is rising with limited high-quality clinical trial data to guide dosing. This study relies on real-world, longitudinal medical cannabis purchase data to provide information on Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) dosing trends for patients with qualifying medical conditions.

Methods: A retrospective study of purchases by 16,727 patients obtaining medical cannabis from dispensaries located in New York between 2016 and 2019, recorded in point-of-sale data. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify clusters of patients following similar progressions in dosing of THC and CBD over time. χ2 tests were performed to identify which patient characteristics and qualifying medical conditions were associated with membership in each trajectory group.

Findings: Six trajectory groups were identified that described different patterns in the THC and CBD doses that patients purchased over the whole time period. For THC, the majority of patients (62.6%) purchased a steady amount but at different levels: consistently low (4.1 mg) or moderate (7.4 mg). Three groups, representing 22.0% together, exhibited doses that either fluctuate or constantly increase over time (5-20 mg). A final group of patients (15.8%) exhibited constant decrease in dose from 11 to 5 mg. For CBD, the data show similar trajectories, but at the generally higher values (4-16 mg). Patients with chronic pain, neuropathy, and cancer were overrepresented in groups where higher doses of THC were purchased over time. Patients with epilepsy had a higher representation in groups with higher doses of CBD across time.

Implications: Results suggest heterogeneous dosing patterns and trajectories in the use of medical cannabis by patients with different medical conditions.

目的:医用大麻的使用在不断增加,但用于指导剂量的高质量临床试验数据却很有限。本研究利用真实世界的纵向医用大麻购买数据,为符合医疗条件的患者提供有关Δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)剂量趋势的信息:对 2016 年至 2019 年期间从纽约药房购买医用大麻的 16727 名患者的购买情况进行了回顾性研究,这些数据记录在销售点数据中。采用基于群体的轨迹建模来识别随着时间推移在四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚剂量上有类似进展的患者群组。进行了χ2检验,以确定哪些患者特征和合格医疗条件与每个轨迹组的成员资格相关:研究发现:六个轨迹组描述了患者在整个时间段内购买 THC 和 CBD 剂量的不同模式。就四氢大麻酚而言,大多数患者(62.6%)的购买量保持稳定,但剂量水平各不相同:持续低剂量(4.1 毫克)或中剂量(7.4 毫克)。三组患者(共占 22.0%)的剂量随时间波动或持续增加(5-20 毫克)。最后一组患者(15.8%)的剂量从 11 毫克持续减少到 5 毫克。对于 CBD,数据显示了类似的轨迹,但剂量普遍较高(4-16 毫克)。慢性疼痛、神经病变和癌症患者在购买较高剂量四氢大麻酚的群体中比例较高。癫痫患者在不同时期购买较高剂量 CBD 的群体中比例较高:结果表明,不同病症的患者使用医用大麻的剂量模式和轨迹各不相同。
{"title":"Medical Cannabis Dosing Trajectories of Patients: Evidence From Sales Data.","authors":"Alexandra F Kritikos, Myfanwy Graham, Dominic Hodgkin, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical cannabis use is rising with limited high-quality clinical trial data to guide dosing. This study relies on real-world, longitudinal medical cannabis purchase data to provide information on Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) dosing trends for patients with qualifying medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of purchases by 16,727 patients obtaining medical cannabis from dispensaries located in New York between 2016 and 2019, recorded in point-of-sale data. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify clusters of patients following similar progressions in dosing of THC and CBD over time. χ<sup>2</sup> tests were performed to identify which patient characteristics and qualifying medical conditions were associated with membership in each trajectory group.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Six trajectory groups were identified that described different patterns in the THC and CBD doses that patients purchased over the whole time period. For THC, the majority of patients (62.6%) purchased a steady amount but at different levels: consistently low (4.1 mg) or moderate (7.4 mg). Three groups, representing 22.0% together, exhibited doses that either fluctuate or constantly increase over time (5-20 mg). A final group of patients (15.8%) exhibited constant decrease in dose from 11 to 5 mg. For CBD, the data show similar trajectories, but at the generally higher values (4-16 mg). Patients with chronic pain, neuropathy, and cancer were overrepresented in groups where higher doses of THC were purchased over time. Patients with epilepsy had a higher representation in groups with higher doses of CBD across time.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Results suggest heterogeneous dosing patterns and trajectories in the use of medical cannabis by patients with different medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142380237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical therapeutics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1