首页 > 最新文献

COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease最新文献

英文 中文
Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. 减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐行为的干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2482710
Stefanie Harding, Alan Richardson, Angela Glynn, Luke Hodgson

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects over 300 million people and is the third leading cause of death. People with COPD spend a large amount of their day sedentary, which is associated with reduced life expectancy.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across electronic databases, including Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Due to the heterogeneity of study design and siting of the activity monitor, a narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: 1086 studies were identified; six met inclusion criteria, and two reported a decreased sedentary time. Nordic walking reduced sedentary time by 128 minutes/day compared to baseline, significantly more than the control group (p < 0.01). Another study using a behaviour change intervention reduced sedentary behaviour by 64 minutes/day compared to baseline, significantly more than the control group (p = 0.018). Both studies were conducted for over 12 weeks, with a multi-modal approach incorporating behaviour change techniques, goal setting, education, self-monitoring and feedback. No studies focusing on reducing sedentary behaviour alone reported significant changes.

Conclusions: Few interventional studies have focused on reducing sedentary behaviour in people with COPD. Interventions that have effectively reduced sedentary time primarily focused on physical activity and adopted a multi-modal strategy. This suggests that future interventions could consider a multi-modal approach, which includes behaviour change and the incorporation of enjoyable light physical activities into daily living. We cannot conclude from the available evidence that solely targeting sedentary time will reduce sedentary behaviour. Longer interventions may reduce sedentary behaviour, but there is a lack of studies on both short- and long-term approaches.PROSPERO registration number CRD 42024510434.

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)影响超过3亿人,是第三大死亡原因。慢性阻塞性肺病患者每天长时间久坐不动,这与预期寿命缩短有关。方法:对Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library等电子数据库进行系统检索。由于研究设计和活动监测仪位置的异质性,我们进行了叙事综合。结果:共纳入1086项研究;6人符合纳入标准,2人报告久坐时间减少。与基线相比,北欧步行减少了128分钟/天的久坐时间,显著高于对照组(p p = 0.018)。两项研究都进行了超过12周,采用多模式方法,包括行为改变技术、目标设定、教育、自我监控和反馈。没有一项专注于减少久坐行为的研究单独报告了显著的变化。结论:很少有介入性研究关注于减少COPD患者的久坐行为。有效减少久坐时间的干预措施主要侧重于身体活动,并采用多模式策略。这表明未来的干预措施可以考虑多模式的方法,包括行为改变和将愉快的轻度体育活动纳入日常生活。我们不能从现有的证据中得出结论,仅仅针对久坐的时间就会减少久坐的行为。较长时间的干预可能会减少久坐行为,但缺乏短期和长期方法的研究。普洛斯彼罗注册号CRD 42024510434。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.","authors":"Stefanie Harding, Alan Richardson, Angela Glynn, Luke Hodgson","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2482710","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2482710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects over 300 million people and is the third leading cause of death. People with COPD spend a large amount of their day sedentary, which is associated with reduced life expectancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across electronic databases, including Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Due to the heterogeneity of study design and siting of the activity monitor, a narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1086 studies were identified; six met inclusion criteria, and two reported a decreased sedentary time. Nordic walking reduced sedentary time by 128 minutes/day compared to baseline, significantly more than the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Another study using a behaviour change intervention reduced sedentary behaviour by 64 minutes/day compared to baseline, significantly more than the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Both studies were conducted for over 12 weeks, with a multi-modal approach incorporating behaviour change techniques, goal setting, education, self-monitoring and feedback. No studies focusing on reducing sedentary behaviour alone reported significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few interventional studies have focused on reducing sedentary behaviour in people with COPD. Interventions that have effectively reduced sedentary time primarily focused on physical activity and adopted a multi-modal strategy. This suggests that future interventions could consider a multi-modal approach, which includes behaviour change and the incorporation of enjoyable light physical activities into daily living. We cannot conclude from the available evidence that solely targeting sedentary time will reduce sedentary behaviour. Longer interventions may reduce sedentary behaviour, but there is a lack of studies on both short- and long-term approaches.PROSPERO registration number CRD 42024510434.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2482710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144728488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IgE Guided Use of ICS in Patients with Stable COPD: A Real-World Observational Study. IgE引导下稳定期COPD患者使用ICS:一项真实世界观察性研究
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-10-25 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2579360
Ziwei Zhou, Yu Tao, Siyi Zhou, Jianmiao Wang

Purpose: This study investigated whether total serum IgE (T-IgE) can serve as a biomarker to guide personalized inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: We conducted retrospective (n = 1236) and prospective (n = 540) cohort studies of stable COPD patients. Participants were stratified by baseline T-IgE levels (cutoffs: 100 and 76 IU/mL). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding factors, and a multivariate negative binomial regression model was constructed to evaluate the effects of ICS on the risks of exacerbations. Additionally, the stability of total serum IgE and its correlation with pulmonary function were analyzed.

Results: In the subgroup with T-IgE ≥ 100 IU/mL, COPD patients had a significantly increased risk of exacerbations, with incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 1.60 (95% CI 1.11-2.29) for moderate exacerbations, 1.37 (1.03-1.82) for moderate or severe exacerbations, and 1.15 (1.00-1.31) for all exacerbations. In this subgroup, ICS treatment significantly reduced the risk of the aforementioned exacerbations, with corresponding IRRs of 0.62 (0.42-0.91), 0.73 (0.53-1.00), and 0.84 (0.72-0.99). In contrast, in the T-IgE < 100 IU/mL subgroup, the benefits of ICS treatment were not statistically significant. Furthermore, total serum IgE demonstrated better stability than blood eosinophil counts and was negatively correlated with pulmonary function indices. Consistent results were obtained using a cutoff value of 76 IU/mL.

Conclusion: The total serum IgE level is closely related to exacerbations of COPD. Patients with high IgE levels can experience a reduced exacerbation rate when treated with ICS.

目的:本研究探讨血清总IgE (T-IgE)是否可以作为一种生物标志物,指导稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的个体化吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)治疗。方法:我们对稳定期COPD患者进行回顾性(n = 1236)和前瞻性(n = 540)队列研究。参与者按基线T-IgE水平分层(临界值:100和76 IU/mL)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡混杂因素,构建多元负二项回归模型评价ICS对急性加重风险的影响。分析血清总IgE的稳定性及其与肺功能的相关性。结果:在T-IgE≥100 IU/mL的亚组中,COPD患者的急性发作风险显著增加,中度急性发作的发生率比(IRRs)为1.60 (95% CI 1.11-2.29),中度或重度急性发作的发生率比(IRRs)为1.37 (95% CI 1.03-1.82),所有急性发作的发生率比为1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.31)。在该亚组中,ICS治疗显著降低了上述加重的风险,相应的irs分别为0.62(0.42-0.91)、0.73(0.53-1.00)和0.84(0.72-0.99)。相比之下,在T-IgE < 100 IU/mL亚组中,ICS治疗的益处无统计学意义。血清总IgE的稳定性优于嗜酸性粒细胞计数,且与肺功能指标呈负相关。使用76 IU/mL的截止值获得一致的结果。结论:血清总IgE水平与慢性阻塞性肺病的加重密切相关。高IgE水平的患者在接受ICS治疗时可降低病情恶化率。
{"title":"IgE Guided Use of ICS in Patients with Stable COPD: A Real-World Observational Study.","authors":"Ziwei Zhou, Yu Tao, Siyi Zhou, Jianmiao Wang","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2579360","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2579360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether total serum IgE (T-IgE) can serve as a biomarker to guide personalized inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted retrospective (<i>n</i> = 1236) and prospective (<i>n</i> = 540) cohort studies of stable COPD patients. Participants were stratified by baseline T-IgE levels (cutoffs: 100 and 76 IU/mL). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding factors, and a multivariate negative binomial regression model was constructed to evaluate the effects of ICS on the risks of exacerbations. Additionally, the stability of total serum IgE and its correlation with pulmonary function were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the subgroup with T-IgE ≥ 100 IU/mL, COPD patients had a significantly increased risk of exacerbations, with incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 1.60 (95% CI 1.11-2.29) for moderate exacerbations, 1.37 (1.03-1.82) for moderate or severe exacerbations, and 1.15 (1.00-1.31) for all exacerbations. In this subgroup, ICS treatment significantly reduced the risk of the aforementioned exacerbations, with corresponding IRRs of 0.62 (0.42-0.91), 0.73 (0.53-1.00), and 0.84 (0.72-0.99). In contrast, in the T-IgE < 100 IU/mL subgroup, the benefits of ICS treatment were not statistically significant. Furthermore, total serum IgE demonstrated better stability than blood eosinophil counts and was negatively correlated with pulmonary function indices. Consistent results were obtained using a cutoff value of 76 IU/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total serum IgE level is closely related to exacerbations of COPD. Patients with high IgE levels can experience a reduced exacerbation rate when treated with ICS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2579360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145400086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric Evaluation of the Assessment of the Burden of COPD Scale According to the Rasch Model. 基于Rasch模型的慢性阻塞性肺病负担量表评估的心理测量学评价。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-06 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232
Maarten Voorhaar, Antoine Regnault, Onno C P van Schayck, Jean Muris, Annerika H M Slok

To facilitate shared decision-making in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Assessment of the Burden of COPD (ABC) tool was developed. An integral part of the ABC tool is the ABC scale, a questionnaire to determine COPD burden. The psychometric evidence of the ABC scale is limited. If the data would fit the Rasch model, more accurate scoring would be possible. This would improve the use of the ABC tool. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the ABC scale using the Rasch model. We conducted a secondary analysis based on data collected in a pragmatic RCT using Rasch model theory. The ordering of thresholds, reliability and targeting were analysed, and we tested unidimensionality, local independence of items (LD), fit of the data with the model and measurement invariance between groups (DIF). We analysed 551 samples from 176 patients. The analyses confirmed that the ABC scale is a reliable instrument. However, initial analysis showed a poor fit of the data to the Rasch model. After recoding the response options and analysing the fit of the data for the subdomains of the ABC scale, we found ordered thresholds and a good overall model fit. This analysis indicates that the ABC scale assessed three distinct sub-domains: symptoms, physical functioning, and emotional health. We conclude that the ABC scale is a valid instrument to assess COPD burden. While the scale is considered suitable for use in clinical practice and research, we suggest rewording the response options to ensure uniform understanding by respondents.

The used data were derived from a previously conducted trial (NTR3788).

为了促进慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的共同决策,开发了COPD负担评估(ABC)工具。ABC量表是ABC工具的一个组成部分,这是一份确定COPD负担的问卷。ABC量表的心理测量证据是有限的。如果数据符合Rasch模型,更准确的评分将成为可能。这将改进ABC工具的使用。因此,本研究的目的是使用Rasch模型对ABC量表进行验证。我们利用Rasch模型理论对一项语用随机对照试验收集的数据进行了二次分析。分析了阈值排序、信度和目标性,并检验了单维性、项目局部独立性(LD)、数据与模型的拟合和组间测量不变性(DIF)。我们分析了176名患者的551份样本。分析证实ABC量表是一个可靠的工具。然而,最初的分析显示数据与Rasch模型的拟合很差。在对回答选项进行重新编码并分析ABC量表子域数据的拟合后,我们发现了有序的阈值和良好的整体模型拟合。该分析表明,ABC量表评估了三个不同的子领域:症状、身体功能和情绪健康。我们得出结论,ABC量表是评估COPD负担的有效工具。虽然该量表被认为适合用于临床实践和研究,但我们建议重新措辞回答选项,以确保受访者的统一理解。使用的数据来自先前进行的一项试验(NTR3788)。
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Assessment of the Burden of COPD Scale According to the Rasch Model.","authors":"Maarten Voorhaar, Antoine Regnault, Onno C P van Schayck, Jean Muris, Annerika H M Slok","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To facilitate shared decision-making in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Assessment of the Burden of COPD (ABC) tool was developed. An integral part of the ABC tool is the ABC scale, a questionnaire to determine COPD burden. The psychometric evidence of the ABC scale is limited. If the data would fit the Rasch model, more accurate scoring would be possible. This would improve the use of the ABC tool. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the ABC scale using the Rasch model. We conducted a secondary analysis based on data collected in a pragmatic RCT using Rasch model theory. The ordering of thresholds, reliability and targeting were analysed, and we tested unidimensionality, local independence of items (LD), fit of the data with the model and measurement invariance between groups (DIF). We analysed 551 samples from 176 patients. The analyses confirmed that the ABC scale is a reliable instrument. However, initial analysis showed a poor fit of the data to the Rasch model. After recoding the response options and analysing the fit of the data for the subdomains of the ABC scale, we found ordered thresholds and a good overall model fit. This analysis indicates that the ABC scale assessed three distinct sub-domains: symptoms, physical functioning, and emotional health. We conclude that the ABC scale is a valid instrument to assess COPD burden. While the scale is considered suitable for use in clinical practice and research, we suggest rewording the response options to ensure uniform understanding by respondents.</p><p><p>The used data were derived from a previously conducted trial (NTR3788).</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2557232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145069192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter Reply to: Reassessing Gabapentinoids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Emerging Respiratory Safety Concerns. 回复:重新评估加巴喷丁类药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病:新出现的呼吸安全问题。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-08-14 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2547722
Omotayo Olaoye, Sophie Dell'Aniello, Pierre Ernst, Samy Suissa, Christel Renoux
{"title":"Letter Reply to: Reassessing Gabapentinoids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Emerging Respiratory Safety Concerns.","authors":"Omotayo Olaoye, Sophie Dell'Aniello, Pierre Ernst, Samy Suissa, Christel Renoux","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2547722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2547722","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2547722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Global Burden of Disease Study on Temporal Trends, Risk Factor Contributions, and Projected Disease Burden from 1990 to 2030. 中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担:1990 - 2030年全球疾病负担的时间趋势、风险因素贡献和预测疾病负担研究
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-07-07 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2531016
Jiaman Liao, Longsheng Zeng, Xueliang Huang, Hao Huang, Cuina Shen, Jing Li, Yiqiang Zhan

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health issue in China, but comprehensive studies on its long-term trends, risk factors, and future projections are limited. This study aimed to assess the COPD burden in China from 1990 to 2021, analyze risk factor contributions across demographic subgroups, and project future trends through 2030 to inform public health interventions. Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 were analyzed for incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Joinpoint regression was used to calculate age-standardized rates, population attributable fractions (PAFs) assessed risk factor contributions, and ARIMA modeling projected future trends. From 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs rates of COPD showed a declining trend, while the absolute burden increased due to population growth and aging. Men had a higher overall disease burden, but since 2015, women have shown higher age-standardized prevalence. The highest burden was observed in the ≥80 age group, with a worrying rise in age-standardized mortality in the 20-24 age group. Smoking was a major risk factor for men, while ambient particulate matter pollution had a greater impact on women and younger adults (30-34 years). Projections suggest a decreasing trend for most age groups, while the 30-39 and ≥80 age groups will experience an increase in age-standardized incidence rates. These findings highlight the need for targeted public health strategies focusing on tobacco control, air pollution, and climate-related exposures, with emphasis on age and sex differences.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是中国的一个重大公共卫生问题,但对其长期趋势、危险因素和未来预测的综合研究有限。本研究旨在评估1990年至2021年中国慢性阻塞性肺病负担,分析不同人口亚组的风险因素,并预测到2030年的未来趋势,为公共卫生干预提供信息。分析了来自2021年全球疾病负担研究的数据,包括发病率、患病率、死亡率和残疾调整生命年(DALYs)。接合点回归用于计算年龄标准化率,人口归因分数(paf)评估风险因素贡献,ARIMA模型预测未来趋势。从1990年到2021年,COPD的年龄标准化发病率、患病率、死亡率和DALYs率呈下降趋势,但绝对负担因人口增长和老龄化而增加。男性的总体疾病负担更高,但自2015年以来,女性的年龄标准化患病率更高。≥80岁年龄组的负担最高,20-24岁年龄组的年龄标准化死亡率有令人担忧的上升。吸烟是男性的主要危险因素,而环境颗粒物污染对女性和年轻人(30-34岁)的影响更大。预测显示大多数年龄组呈下降趋势,而30-39岁和≥80岁年龄组的年龄标准化发病率将增加。这些发现强调需要有针对性的公共卫生战略,重点关注烟草控制、空气污染和与气候有关的暴露,并强调年龄和性别差异。
{"title":"Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Global Burden of Disease Study on Temporal Trends, Risk Factor Contributions, and Projected Disease Burden from 1990 to 2030.","authors":"Jiaman Liao, Longsheng Zeng, Xueliang Huang, Hao Huang, Cuina Shen, Jing Li, Yiqiang Zhan","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2531016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2531016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health issue in China, but comprehensive studies on its long-term trends, risk factors, and future projections are limited. This study aimed to assess the COPD burden in China from 1990 to 2021, analyze risk factor contributions across demographic subgroups, and project future trends through 2030 to inform public health interventions. Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 were analyzed for incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Joinpoint regression was used to calculate age-standardized rates, population attributable fractions (PAFs) assessed risk factor contributions, and ARIMA modeling projected future trends. From 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs rates of COPD showed a declining trend, while the absolute burden increased due to population growth and aging. Men had a higher overall disease burden, but since 2015, women have shown higher age-standardized prevalence. The highest burden was observed in the ≥80 age group, with a worrying rise in age-standardized mortality in the 20-24 age group. Smoking was a major risk factor for men, while ambient particulate matter pollution had a greater impact on women and younger adults (30-34 years). Projections suggest a decreasing trend for most age groups, while the 30-39 and ≥80 age groups will experience an increase in age-standardized incidence rates. These findings highlight the need for targeted public health strategies focusing on tobacco control, air pollution, and climate-related exposures, with emphasis on age and sex differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2531016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144625540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung Function Decline in COPD - Relations to Changes in Symptom Burden, Inflammation, and Comorbidities. COPD患者肺功能下降与症状负担、炎症和合并症变化的关系
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2525433
Juan Wang, Björn Ställberg, Maria Hårdstedt, Kristina Bröms, Margareta Gonzalez Lindh, Amir Farkhooy, Andreas Palm, Karin Lisspers, Marieann Högman, Andrei Malinovschi

Purpose: The study aims to improve the knowledge on the associations between comorbidities, symptom burden, inflammatory biomarkers and lung function deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Materials and methods: Of the 572 COPD subjects initially included in the 2014-2016 Tools for Identifying Exacerbations in COPD study in Sweden, 228 had lung function data at the 7-year follow-up. Symptom burden was assessed by the modified British Medical Research Council scale of dyspnoea (mMRC), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). Relative lung function decline was assessed as decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline/year.

Results: Lower baseline symptom burden (mMRC, CAT and CCQ), higher FEV1 and FEV1% predicted, higher forced vital capacity (FVC) and having atrial fibrillation were associated with larger absolute FEV1 decline. Associations were found for having atrial fibrillation at baseline and larger relative FEV1 decline (Beta = -1.60, p = 0.005). Increased symptom burden (value at follow-up minus value at baseline), assessed by mMRC, CAT and CCQ, was positively associated with both larger absolute FEV1 decline (mMRC: Beta = 6.4, p = 0.009; CAT: Beta = 1.63, p = 0.002; CCQ: Beta = 10.6, p < 0.001) and larger relative FEV1 decline (mMRC: Beta = 0.44, p = 0.003; CAT: Beta = 0.13, p < 0.002; CCQ: Beta = 0.82, p < 0.001). Moreover, an increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at follow-up was related to larger, both absolute and relative, FEV1 decline (Beta = 1.14, p = 0.031 and Beta = 0.07, p = 0.019, respectively).

Conclusions: Changes in systemic inflammation and symptom burden between two visits were positively associated with a 7-year lung function decline.

目的:本研究旨在提高对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并症、症状负担、炎症生物标志物与肺功能恶化之间关系的认识。材料和方法:在瑞典2014-2016年COPD加重识别工具研究中最初纳入的572例COPD受试者中,228例在7年随访时具有肺功能数据。采用改良的英国医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)、慢阻肺评估测试(CAT)和慢阻肺临床问卷(CCQ)评估症状负担。相对肺功能下降的评估标准是一秒钟用力呼气量(FEV1)较基线/年的下降。结果:较低的基线症状负担(mMRC、CAT和CCQ)、较高的FEV1和FEV1%预测值、较高的强制肺活量(FVC)和房颤与较大的FEV1绝对下降相关。基线时发生房颤和相对FEV1下降幅度较大存在关联(Beta = -1.60, p = 0.005)。由mMRC、CAT和CCQ评估的症状负担增加(随访值减去基线值)与较大的绝对FEV1下降呈正相关(mMRC: Beta = 6.4, p = 0.009;CAT: Beta = 1.63, p = 0.002;CCQ: Beta = 10.6, p = 0.001下降(mMRC: Beta = 0.44, p = 0.003;CAT: Beta = 0.13, p p 1下降(Beta = 1.14, p = 0.031, Beta = 0.07, p = 0.019)。结论:两次就诊之间全身性炎症和症状负担的变化与7年肺功能下降呈正相关。
{"title":"Lung Function Decline in COPD - Relations to Changes in Symptom Burden, Inflammation, and Comorbidities.","authors":"Juan Wang, Björn Ställberg, Maria Hårdstedt, Kristina Bröms, Margareta Gonzalez Lindh, Amir Farkhooy, Andreas Palm, Karin Lisspers, Marieann Högman, Andrei Malinovschi","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2525433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2525433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to improve the knowledge on the associations between comorbidities, symptom burden, inflammatory biomarkers and lung function deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Of the 572 COPD subjects initially included in the 2014-2016 Tools for Identifying Exacerbations in COPD study in Sweden, 228 had lung function data at the 7-year follow-up. Symptom burden was assessed by the modified British Medical Research Council scale of dyspnoea (mMRC), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). Relative lung function decline was assessed as decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) from baseline/year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower baseline symptom burden (mMRC, CAT and CCQ), higher FEV<sub>1</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub>% predicted, higher forced vital capacity (FVC) and having atrial fibrillation were associated with larger absolute FEV<sub>1</sub> decline. Associations were found for having atrial fibrillation at baseline and larger relative FEV<sub>1</sub> decline (Beta = -1.60, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Increased symptom burden (value at follow-up minus value at baseline), assessed by mMRC, CAT and CCQ, was positively associated with both larger absolute FEV<sub>1</sub> decline (mMRC: Beta = 6.4, <i>p</i> = 0.009; CAT: Beta = 1.63, <i>p</i> = 0.002; CCQ: Beta = 10.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and larger relative FEV<sub>1</sub> decline (mMRC: Beta = 0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.003; CAT: Beta = 0.13, <i>p</i> < 0.002; CCQ: Beta = 0.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Moreover, an increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at follow-up was related to larger, both absolute and relative, FEV<sub>1</sub> decline (Beta = 1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.031 and Beta = 0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.019, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in systemic inflammation and symptom burden between two visits were positively associated with a 7-year lung function decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2525433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Respiratory Clinicians' Views on Offering "Rescue Packs" to Patients Discharged After COPD Exacerbation: Qualitative Interview Study. 呼吸内科医生对COPD急性加重出院患者提供“抢救包”的看法:质性访谈研究
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-06-22 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2524346
Karolina Kuberska, Graham Martin, John R Hurst, Mona Bafadhel

"Rescue packs" for COPD exacerbations, consisting of a course of antibiotics and steroids, have become part of self-management strategies for many patients living with COPD. Currently, in the UK, rescue packs are guideline-recommended but not routinely offered on hospital discharge. They are, however, commonly prescribed by primary care teams. This study examined hospital-based respiratory clinicians' views on offering patients rescue packs following hospitalisation for COPD exacerbations. We conducted 24 individual and joint semi-structured interviews via telephone or videocall with 30 clinicians (respiratory consultants, respiratory registrars and specialist nurses) in 20 UK hospitals to understand variation in practice around, and views on, offering rescue packs to discharged COPD patients. Interview data were analysed using the constant comparative method. Clinicians' views on offering rescue packs were a mixture of concerns and recognition of potential benefits. Concerns included antimicrobial resistance, individual overuse of antibiotics, and potential side effects of steroids, especially in patients with poorer understanding of their own condition, with lower self-management skills, or who found it difficult to access primary care. Recognised benefits included the potential to prevent future exacerbations, empowering patients by supporting COPD self-management, and circumventing the difficulties of securing an urgent primary care appointment. There was a consensus that supporting patients in self-management of COPD was key to effective care. Given the increasing role of self-management for patients living with COPD, it is vital to ensure that patients are able to appropriately use rescue packs.

针对慢性阻塞性肺病恶化的“救援包”,包括一个疗程的抗生素和类固醇,已成为许多慢性阻塞性肺病患者自我管理策略的一部分。目前,在英国,急救包是指南推荐的,但在出院时通常不提供。然而,它们通常由初级保健团队开处方。本研究调查了医院呼吸系统临床医生在COPD加重住院后为患者提供救援包的观点。我们通过电话或视频电话对20家英国医院的30名临床医生(呼吸咨询师、呼吸登记员和专科护士)进行了24次单独和联合半结构化访谈,以了解为出院COPD患者提供急救包的实践变化和观点。访谈资料采用恒常比较法进行分析。临床医生对提供抢救包的看法是担忧和认识到潜在的好处。人们关注的问题包括抗菌素耐药性、抗生素的个人过度使用和类固醇的潜在副作用,特别是对自身病情了解较差、自我管理技能较低或难以获得初级保健的患者。公认的益处包括预防未来恶化的潜力,通过支持COPD自我管理赋予患者权力,以及规避获得紧急初级保健预约的困难。支持患者自我管理COPD是有效治疗的关键,这是一个共识。鉴于自我管理对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的作用越来越大,确保患者能够适当使用急救包至关重要。
{"title":"Respiratory Clinicians' Views on Offering \"Rescue Packs\" to Patients Discharged After COPD Exacerbation: Qualitative Interview Study.","authors":"Karolina Kuberska, Graham Martin, John R Hurst, Mona Bafadhel","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2524346","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2524346","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Rescue packs\" for COPD exacerbations, consisting of a course of antibiotics and steroids, have become part of self-management strategies for many patients living with COPD. Currently, in the UK, rescue packs are guideline-recommended but not routinely offered on hospital discharge. They are, however, commonly prescribed by primary care teams. This study examined hospital-based respiratory clinicians' views on offering patients rescue packs following hospitalisation for COPD exacerbations. We conducted 24 individual and joint semi-structured interviews <i>via</i> telephone or videocall with 30 clinicians (respiratory consultants, respiratory registrars and specialist nurses) in 20 UK hospitals to understand variation in practice around, and views on, offering rescue packs to discharged COPD patients. Interview data were analysed using the constant comparative method. Clinicians' views on offering rescue packs were a mixture of concerns and recognition of potential benefits. Concerns included antimicrobial resistance, individual overuse of antibiotics, and potential side effects of steroids, especially in patients with poorer understanding of their own condition, with lower self-management skills, or who found it difficult to access primary care. Recognised benefits included the potential to prevent future exacerbations, empowering patients by supporting COPD self-management, and circumventing the difficulties of securing an urgent primary care appointment. There was a consensus that supporting patients in self-management of COPD was key to effective care. Given the increasing role of self-management for patients living with COPD, it is vital to ensure that patients are able to appropriately use rescue packs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2524346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144526750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inhaler Devices for LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD. LABA/LAMA固定剂量联合吸入器在COPD患者中的使用、有效性和安全性
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-05-16 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548
Sara Lopes, Maria Lucia Marino, Filomena Fortinguerra, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Francesco Trotta

In Italy, long-acting bronchodilator (LABA/LAMA) fixed-dose combinations are widely used for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These medications are available in various inhaler devices, but clinical guidelines do not recommend a specific device, leaving the choice to clinicians based on patient needs. To date, no studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of different LABA/LAMA devices. This retrospective observational study evaluated the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of LABA/LAMA inhaler devices in COPD patients in the Lazio region, representing about 10% of Italy's population. Patients aged 45 and older who initiated LABA/LAMA treatment between January 2017 and December 2019 were included. The devices analyzed were dry powder inhalers (DPI) capsule/strip (DPI-t, reference group), DPI with a reservoir (DPI-r), and soft mist inhalers (SMI). The study identified 12,346 eligible patients, with over 80% having prior COPD drug use. Of these, 53.2% used DPI-t, 19.7% DPI-r, and 27.1% SMI. No significant differences in severe exacerbations, mortality, pneumonia, or cerebro-cardiovascular events were observed among the devices. Hazard ratios for key outcomes (e.g., severe exacerbations, mortality) showed overlapping confidence intervals across device types, suggesting no device offered superior effectiveness or safety. This is the first study to assess LABA/LAMA device use in real-world clinical practice for COPD. Findings suggest therapeutic equivalence among devices, supporting flexibility in prescribing. Further research is needed to inform cost-effective prescribing policies for LABA/LAMA therapies.

在意大利,长效支气管扩张剂(LABA/LAMA)固定剂量组合广泛用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。这些药物可在各种吸入器装置中使用,但临床指南不推荐特定的装置,让临床医生根据患者的需要进行选择。到目前为止,还没有研究直接比较不同LABA/LAMA装置的有效性和安全性。这项回顾性观察性研究评估了LABA/LAMA吸入器在拉齐奥地区COPD患者中的使用、有效性和安全性,该地区约占意大利人口的10%。纳入了2017年1月至2019年12月期间开始LABA/LAMA治疗的45岁及以上患者。所分析的设备包括干粉吸入器(DPI)胶囊/条(DPI-t,参照组)、带储液器的DPI (DPI-r)和软雾吸入器(SMI)。该研究确定了12346名符合条件的患者,其中80%以上有COPD药物使用史。其中,53.2%使用DPI-t, 19.7%使用DPI-r, 27.1%使用SMI。两种装置在严重恶化、死亡率、肺炎或脑血管事件方面未观察到显著差异。关键结果(如严重恶化、死亡率)的风险比在不同设备类型之间显示重叠的置信区间,表明没有设备具有更好的有效性或安全性。这是第一个评估LABA/LAMA设备在COPD临床实践中的应用的研究。研究结果表明,设备之间的治疗等效,支持处方的灵活性。需要进一步的研究来为具有成本效益的LABA/LAMA治疗处方政策提供信息。
{"title":"Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inhaler Devices for LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD.","authors":"Sara Lopes, Maria Lucia Marino, Filomena Fortinguerra, Nera Agabiti, Valeria Belleudi, Francesco Trotta","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548","DOIUrl":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2506548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Italy, long-acting bronchodilator (LABA/LAMA) fixed-dose combinations are widely used for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These medications are available in various inhaler devices, but clinical guidelines do not recommend a specific device, leaving the choice to clinicians based on patient needs. To date, no studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of different LABA/LAMA devices. This retrospective observational study evaluated the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of LABA/LAMA inhaler devices in COPD patients in the Lazio region, representing about 10% of Italy's population. Patients aged 45 and older who initiated LABA/LAMA treatment between January 2017 and December 2019 were included. The devices analyzed were dry powder inhalers (DPI) capsule/strip (DPI-<i>t</i>, reference group), DPI with a reservoir (DPI-r), and soft mist inhalers (SMI). The study identified 12,346 eligible patients, with over 80% having prior COPD drug use. Of these, 53.2% used DPI-<i>t</i>, 19.7% DPI-r, and 27.1% SMI. No significant differences in severe exacerbations, mortality, pneumonia, or cerebro-cardiovascular events were observed among the devices. Hazard ratios for key outcomes (e.g., severe exacerbations, mortality) showed overlapping confidence intervals across device types, suggesting no device offered superior effectiveness or safety. This is the first study to assess LABA/LAMA device use in real-world clinical practice for COPD. Findings suggest therapeutic equivalence among devices, supporting flexibility in prescribing. Further research is needed to inform cost-effective prescribing policies for LABA/LAMA therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2506548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144119142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meta-Analysis Should Not Be Simply Conducted By Default: Biologic Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 荟萃分析不应该简单地默认进行:慢性阻塞性肺疾病的生物治疗。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-05-13 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2501548
Jean Bourbeau, Claudia LeBlanc, Bryan Ross, Darcy Marciniuk
{"title":"Meta-Analysis Should Not Be Simply Conducted By Default: Biologic Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Jean Bourbeau, Claudia LeBlanc, Bryan Ross, Darcy Marciniuk","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2501548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2501548","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2501548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144110016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can Passive Cough Monitoring Predict COPD Exacerbations? 被动咳嗽监测能否预测COPD恶化?
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-04-04 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2025.2487909
A H Morice, A C den Brinker, M Crooks, S Thackray-Nocera, O Ouweltjes, R Rietman

Purpose: Validation of an alert mechanism for COPD exacerbations based on coughing detected by a stationary unobtrusive nighttime monitor.

Methods: This prospective double-blind longitudinal study of cough monitoring included 40 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Participants underwent cough monitoring and completed a daily questionnaire for 12 weeks. If no exacerbation occurred within that period patients were asked to continue being monitored for a further 12 weeks. The automated system identified deteriorating trends in cough based on a personalized cough classifier and the alerts were compared with patient reported exacerbation onsets.

Results: Thirty-eight patients [median age 72 (range 57-84)], median FEV-1% predicted 43% (range 20-106%) completed the study and had 41 exacerbations over a total of 3981 days. For 32 patients, the cough monitor data allowed classifier personalization, trend analysis, and alert generation. Based on the trend data, it is estimated that ∼30% of exacerbations are not associated with an increase in cough. The alert mechanism flagged 59% of the exacerbations. For the cases with alerts preceding the onset, the associated lead time was 4 days or more.

Conclusion: Though based on a single variable only, the cough-based alert system captured more than half of the exacerbations in a passive, free-living scenario. No adherence issues were reported, and patients confirmed the unobtrusive and hassle-free nature of the approach.

目的:验证一种基于静止不显眼的夜间监测仪检测到的咳嗽的慢性阻塞性肺病加重的警报机制。方法:对40例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行咳嗽监测的前瞻性双盲纵向研究。参与者接受咳嗽监测并完成为期12周的每日问卷调查。如果在此期间未发生恶化,则要求患者继续监测12周。自动化系统根据个性化咳嗽分类器识别咳嗽恶化趋势,并将警报与患者报告的加重发作进行比较。结果:38名患者[中位年龄72岁(范围57-84)],中位FEV-1%预测43%(范围20-106%)完成了研究,在总共3981天内有41次恶化。对于32例患者,咳嗽监测数据允许分类个性化,趋势分析和警报生成。根据趋势数据,估计约30%的加重与咳嗽增加无关。警报机制标记了59%的病情恶化。对于发病前有警报的病例,相关的提前期为4天或更长时间。结论:虽然基于单一变量,但基于咳嗽的警报系统在被动、自由生活的情况下捕获了一半以上的恶化。没有依从性问题的报道,患者证实了该方法的不显眼和无麻烦的性质。
{"title":"Can Passive Cough Monitoring Predict COPD Exacerbations?","authors":"A H Morice, A C den Brinker, M Crooks, S Thackray-Nocera, O Ouweltjes, R Rietman","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2487909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2487909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Validation of an alert mechanism for COPD exacerbations based on coughing detected by a stationary unobtrusive nighttime monitor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective double-blind longitudinal study of cough monitoring included 40 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Participants underwent cough monitoring and completed a daily questionnaire for 12 weeks. If no exacerbation occurred within that period patients were asked to continue being monitored for a further 12 weeks. The automated system identified deteriorating trends in cough based on a personalized cough classifier and the alerts were compared with patient reported exacerbation onsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight patients [median age 72 (range 57-84)], median FEV-1% predicted 43% (range 20-106%) completed the study and had 41 exacerbations over a total of 3981 days. For 32 patients, the cough monitor data allowed classifier personalization, trend analysis, and alert generation. Based on the trend data, it is estimated that ∼30% of exacerbations are not associated with an increase in cough. The alert mechanism flagged 59% of the exacerbations. For the cases with alerts preceding the onset, the associated lead time was 4 days or more.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though based on a single variable only, the cough-based alert system captured more than half of the exacerbations in a passive, free-living scenario. No adherence issues were reported, and patients confirmed the unobtrusive and hassle-free nature of the approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2487909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143986286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1