Crohn's & Colitis 360最新文献

Background: Research on psychiatric comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has focused mostly on anxiety and depression. This study aimed to describe the spectrum of psychiatric disorders experienced by individuals with IBD and their overlap.

Methods: Participants were enrolled in a prospective 3-year longitudinal study that assessed psychiatric comorbidity in immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Lifetime prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-IV), as the DSM-IV was the prevailing classification at the time of study design. Diagnosis was aligned with DSM-5 categorization where possible with available data. Psychiatric burden was categorized as no psychiatric conditions, 1, 2 or 3 or more psychiatric conditions.

Results: Of 154 IBD participants (62%female, 63% Crohn's disease) 57% had at least one psychiatric comorbidity with 27% having >1 psychiatric diagnosis. The prevalence was major depressive disorder (MDD, 41.7%), anxiety disorders (39.6%; grouped as per DSM-5), substance use disorder (SUD, 16.2%), posttraumatic stress disorder (5.3%), obsessive-compulsive disorder (4.9%), and bipolar disorder (2.0%). Of participants with MDD and a comorbid psychiatric disorder, nearly half had SUD. Of those with >1 psychiatric disorder >70% had MDD and a comorbid anxiety disorder. Persons with ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity were more likely to be current smokers (P < .001) and to have higher IBD disease activity scores (P = .005) than those without a psychiatric comorbidity.

Conclusions: Over half of adults with IBD had >1 diagnosed psychiatric comorbidity from a range of 10 different psychiatric disorders identified. Further research should assess the temporal relationship of IBD and the various psychiatric presentations to better understand the trajectory of co-occurrence, and therapy which may concurrently address the psychiatric disorder and the IBD.

Background: This study evaluates the effectiveness of different methods to recruit patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) into a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: 630 participants were recruited into a multicenter RCT using electronic medical record (EMR) bulk messaging, in-person study discussion with a clinician, or a hybrid method combining the above approaches.

Results: Bulk EMR messaging alone had the highest recruitment and response rates, required the least amount of time to implement, and incurred the lowest cost as compared to the in-person and hybrid recruitment methods.

Conclusions: Digital health technology can enhance the recruitment of patients with IBD into randomized controlled trials.

Background: This study examined Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) management and outcomes during pregnancy in a tertiary care setting, focusing on disease activity, medication use, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: A prospective cohort study followed 287 women with IBD through 291 pregnancies from 2017 to 2023 at a single tertiary care center, collecting data preconception, during each trimester, and postpartum.

Results: The study observed a 92.7% live birth rate. Seventy-four percent of individuals were in clinical remission preconception, and disease activity increased throughout pregnancy, particularly in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (peaking at 37% in the second trimester), while remaining stable in CD patients. UC, disease duration <5 years, and preconception activity correlated with higher disease activity during pregnancy. Biologic use remained stable without significant impact on outcomes. Preterm delivery (6.7%) and small for gestational age infants (7%) rates reflected baseline population risk. Steroid use was associated with higher preterm delivery rates. Gestational hypertension (6.9%) and diabetes (9.4%) rates were similar to population norms. Maternal adverse events were higher in women 40 or older (OR 3.893).

Conclusions: This study reaffirms the safety of continued medical therapy for IBD throughout pregnancy in a tertiary care, prospective cohort. Increased disease activity throughout pregnancy was evident, particularly in UC. Despite higher rates of disease activity amongst those with UC, outcomes were similar in those with CD vs UC-suggesting that disease activity measures have limitations in CD and pregnancy, or there is some mild inherent risk of CD in pregnancy outcomes irrespective of disease activity.

Background: Advanced combination therapy with biologics and small molecules has seen more widespread implementation for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is a paucity of data available to guide the successful de-escalation of combination therapy following the achievement of disease remission. Therefore, we pursued this retrospective study to evaluate our center's approach to de-escalation of these patients.

Methods: IBD patients undergoing de-escalation of combination biologic therapy from May 2017 to March 2023 with a follow-up visit were included. The need for re-escalation, steroid therapy, and hospitalization at follow-up was compared between the de-escalation method, adherence, patient demographics, disease characteristics, and measures of disease activity.

Results: Fifty IBD patients underwent de-escalation, with a median age of 35.7 years. All 50 patients had a follow-up visit within a median of 168 (111) days. Patients were divided into two groups with 12 (24%) patients requiring re-escalation of therapy and 38 (76%) able to maintain or further de-escalate. Of those that required re-escalation, 3 (25%) required the use of systemic steroids and none required hospitalization for IBD. Non-adherence to the de-escalation plan significantly correlated with the need for re-escalation (P < .001).

Conclusions: Patient adherence and the number of prior failed biologic therapies were identified as potential risk factors for re-escalation. The type of agent being de-escalated (biologic or Janus kinase inhibitors [JAKi] did not correlate with the need for re-escalation).

Background/aims: Filgotinib (FIL), a Janus kinase inhibitor, shows clinical efficacy in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), but no prospective studies have examined endoscopic and histopathological outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of FIL in moderate to severe UC using the Partial Mayo Score (PMS), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and Geboes Histopathology Score (GHS).

Methods: Twenty-two patients with clinically moderate to severe refractory UC were enrolled. Remission was defined as PMS 0, UCEIS 0, and GHS < 2.0 (sigmoid and rectum). Achievement rates were prospectively evaluated at 12, 24, and 52 weeks after FIL initiation compared to baseline.

Results: Among the 22 patients, comprising Biologic-Naïve (BN, n = 12) and Biologic-Experienced (BE, n = 10) cohorts, achievement rates were highest for PMS 0, followed by UCEIS 0, and lowest for GHS < 2.0. Partial Mayo Score 0 achievement for BN/BE was 75% (P = .001)/50% (P = .031) at 12 weeks, 75% (P = .003)/70% (P = .016) at 24 weeks, and 75% (P = .002)/70% (P = .016) at 52 weeks. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity 0 achievement for BN/BE was 58.3% (P = .008)/20% (P = .016) at 12 weeks, 41.6% (P = .019)/40% (P = .016) at 24 weeks, and 50% (P = .002)/50% (P = .016) at 52 weeks. Geboes Histopathology Score < 2.0 (sigmoid) achievement for BN/BE was 25%/0% at 12 weeks, 33.3%/10% at 24 weeks, and 25%/10% at 52 weeks. Geboes Histopathology Score < 2.0 (rectum) achievement for BN/BE was 50%/0% at 12 weeks, 41.6%/20% at 24 weeks, and 33.3%/40% at 52 weeks.

Conclusions: Filgotinib appears to be an effective treatment for UC, demonstrating potential for achieving not only clinical remission but also endoscopic and histopathological remission.

Prior research has estimated the rates of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) to be between 10% and 54% in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, recently published studies have questioned the ability of providers to differentiate the presence of ARFID in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and highlighted the relationship between ARFID and food literacy, which may reflect poor cognitive or psychological flexibility to navigate dietary restriction. We suggest the discourse around ARFID has neglected the neurological basis of fear conditioning as to how and why patients develop fear around eating in the setting of severe postprandial symptoms. In this review, we discuss the role of the amygdala in post-ingestive learning and how this needs to shape the approach to dietary liberalization for the highest likelihood of success. We provide specific strategies for practice when working with patients who experience significant fear of eating, including the framework for and development of appropriate exposure hierarchies to guide the reintroduction process. We encourage collaboration with dietitians and psychologists trained in gastroenterology when possible.

Background: Antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose escalation is performed to improve therapeutic response and optimize outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to describe the durability of anti-TNF therapy in patients with CD receiving escalated anti-TNF therapy, along with the overall durability of anti-TNF treatment between patients managed with a proactive versus reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) approach.

Methods: We undertook a retrospective multicentre cohort study. One center practiced proactive TDM with a weekly virtual TDM clinic, while the other practiced reactive TDM. Patients receiving escalated infliximab or adalimumab therapy for CD from January 2015 to April 2022 were included. Durability was defined as the time from biologic start to cessation for treatment failure.

Results: About 239 patients (45% female, median age 39) meeting criteria for inclusion were identified. About 165 patients were included in the proactive TDM cohort and 74 in the reactive TDM cohort.Anti-TNF naïve patients had significantly higher durability of therapy when compared with the anti-TNF exposed patients for both overall durability (P = .045) and durability postescalation (P = .017). The proactive TDM cohort had significantly higher durability when compared with the reactive cohort for both overall durability (P = .001) and durability postescalation (P = .002).

Conclusions: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study illustrates the importance of dose escalation as a therapeutic strategy in IBD care. The durability of anti-TNF therapy is superior in anti-TNF naïve compared to exposed patients and can be improved further by proactive TDM to guide dose optimization.

Background/aims: With the recent increase in available treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), shared decision-making has gained considerable importance. To address potential disparities in patient and physician priorities, we conducted a survey to clarify these perspectives.

Methods: Patients with IBD and physicians treating IBD were asked to complete an online questionnaire focused on key factors influencing drug selection and preferred drug administration methods.

Results: Responses were obtained from 400 patients (327 with ulcerative colitis and 73 with Crohn's disease) and 155 physicians. Among the factors in drug selection, physicians assigned significantly higher importance scores for experience with the drug than did patients. The expected time to onset of drug effects was significantly different between patients and physicians. Regarding preferences for drug administration method, patients and physicians assigned the highest acceptability scores for once-daily oral administration. For intravenous and subcutaneous routes, patients' scores were significantly lower than those of physicians' scores. Notably, 86.0% of patients and 62.0% of physicians preferred oral administration as the most preferred method. However, preferences varied based on treatment experience: 34.7% of patients with prior experience with subcutaneous injection preferred this method.

Conclusions: Patients and physicians generally shared similar priorities for drug selection; however, physicians emphasized their experience with the drug over patient preferences. Although the number of patients with prior treatment experience preferred intravenous or subcutaneous injections, oral formulations remained the preferred choice for both patients and physicians.

Objectives: Oral extraintestinal manifestations (OEIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact IBD treatment. The aims of this study were to: (1) determine which OEIMs are most prevalent among patients with IBD, (2) investigate the presence of a temporal association between GI luminal disease activity and OEIMs, and (3) determine how often changes in therapeutic management of IBD are needed in the presence of OEIMs.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study was performed for adult patients with IBD evaluated between January 2017 and November 2021 with at least 1 oral complaint. Demographic data were collected from the charts of these patients. Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous measures and Fisher's Exact test for categorical measures were used.

Results: A total of 116 patients with IBD who had presented with at least 1 oral finding during the study time period were identified. Aphthous ulcers were the most common oral presentation in both Crohn's disease (CD) (85.1%) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (75.0%). OEIMs were associated with CD activity in the small intestine (P = .004) and colon (P < .001). UC pancolitis was associated with OEIMs (P = .002). In 32.7% of patients, OEIMs led to either an increase in dose or frequency of IBD therapy. In an additional 16.4% of patients, new systemic agents were started because of the OEIMs.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that patients with IBD may develop OEIMs synchronous with IBD flares and may require escalation of IBD therapy when OEIMs occur.

Background: In this nationwide study, we aimed to explore healthcare services utilization, medical management, and disease outcomes of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) across the 2 major ethnic groups in Israel.

Methods: We utilized a cohort including all patients diagnosed with IBD in Israel since 2005. The primary outcome was steroid dependency, with secondary outcomes including use of biologics, time to surgery, and hospitalizations. Outcomes were controlled for possible inherent differences in disease course and phenotype.

Results: Of the 32 491 included patients, 18 252 (56%) had Crohn's disease (CD) and 14 239 (44%) had ulcerative colitis (UC); 10% were Arabs and 90% were Jews. Jewish ethnicity was associated with lower rates of steroid dependency compared to Arab ethnicity in both CD (HR = 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6-0.8]) and UC (HR = 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6-0.8]). The risk of IBD-related surgery in CD was higher in the Arab group at both 3 and 5 years (13% vs. 10%, 16% vs 14%, respectively, P = .005). Arabs had more frequent IBD-related hospitalizations than Jews at 5 years (28% vs. 19% with at least 2 hospitalizations, P < .001). In contrast, Jewish ethnicity was associated with more frequent use of biologics during the first year from diagnosis in patients with CD (HR = 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.6]) but not with UC.

Conclusions: Arab ethnicity is associated with higher rates of hospitalizations, steroid dependency, and surgeries, and, on the other side, with lower utilization of biologics. Healthcare practitioners and policymakers should address potential cultural and systemic barriers in healthcare delivery in order to improve care across all populations.