Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01238-y
Jacob Hartz
Purpose of review
This review presents the risks and benefits of very low LDL cholesterol and the safety of using lipid-lowering therapy to achieve these levels.
Recent findings
A growing body of literature suggests that lower LDL cholesterol levels are associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. Further, achieving these levels with pharmaceuticals is remarkably safe. Although statins may slightly increase the risk of diabetes mellitus and hemorrhagic stroke, the benefits outweigh the risks.
Summary
While recommendations from professional societies are increasingly aggressive, additional risk reduction could be achieved by setting more even ambitious LDL cholesterol goals.
{"title":"Low LDL-C: Is It all Good News?","authors":"Jacob Hartz","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01238-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-024-01238-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of review</h3><p>This review presents the risks and benefits of very low LDL cholesterol and the safety of using lipid-lowering therapy to achieve these levels.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent findings</h3><p>A growing body of literature suggests that lower LDL cholesterol levels are associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. Further, achieving these levels with pharmaceuticals is remarkably safe. Although statins may slightly increase the risk of diabetes mellitus and hemorrhagic stroke, the benefits outweigh the risks.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>While recommendations from professional societies are increasingly aggressive, additional risk reduction could be achieved by setting more even ambitious LDL cholesterol goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142192710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-07DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01234-2
Rishi Chandiramani, Adhya Mehta, Roger S Blumenthal, Marlene S Williams
Purpose of review: To summarize the recent evidence and guideline recommendations on aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and provide insights into future directions on this topic, which involves transition to a personalized assessment of bleeding and thrombotic risks.
Recent findings: It has been questioned whether the evidence for aspirin as the foundational component of secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease aligns with contemporary pharmaco-invasive strategies. The recent HOST-EXAM study randomized patients who had received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 to 18 months without ischemic or major bleeding events to either clopidogrel or aspirin for a further 24 months, and demonstrated that the patients in the clopidogrel arm had significantly lower rates of both thrombotic and bleeding complications compared to those in the aspirin arm. The patient-level PANTHER meta-analysis showed that in patients with established coronary artery disease, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis as well as gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy, albeit with similar rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding. Long-term low-dose aspirin is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, with clopidogrel monotherapy being acknowledged as a feasible alternative. Dual antiplatelet therapy for six months after percutaneous coronary intervention remains the standard recommendation for patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy may be shortened and followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or prolonged based on individualized evaluation of the patient's risk profile.
{"title":"Should We Use Aspirin or P2Y<sub>12</sub> Inhibitor Monotherapy in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease?","authors":"Rishi Chandiramani, Adhya Mehta, Roger S Blumenthal, Marlene S Williams","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01234-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-024-01234-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize the recent evidence and guideline recommendations on aspirin or P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor monotherapy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and provide insights into future directions on this topic, which involves transition to a personalized assessment of bleeding and thrombotic risks.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>It has been questioned whether the evidence for aspirin as the foundational component of secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease aligns with contemporary pharmaco-invasive strategies. The recent HOST-EXAM study randomized patients who had received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 to 18 months without ischemic or major bleeding events to either clopidogrel or aspirin for a further 24 months, and demonstrated that the patients in the clopidogrel arm had significantly lower rates of both thrombotic and bleeding complications compared to those in the aspirin arm. The patient-level PANTHER meta-analysis showed that in patients with established coronary artery disease, P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor monotherapy was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis as well as gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy, albeit with similar rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding. Long-term low-dose aspirin is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, with clopidogrel monotherapy being acknowledged as a feasible alternative. Dual antiplatelet therapy for six months after percutaneous coronary intervention remains the standard recommendation for patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy may be shortened and followed by P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor monotherapy or prolonged based on individualized evaluation of the patient's risk profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01235-1
Maha Inam, Sana Sheikh, Adeel Khoja, Amina Abubakar, Reena Shah, Zainab Samad, Anthony Ngugi, Farhana Alarakhiya, Akbar Waljee, Salim S Virani
Purpose of review: The rising burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Africa is of great concern. Health data sciences is a rapidly developing field which has the potential to improve health outcomes, especially in low-middle income countries with burdened healthcare systems. We aim to explore the current CVD landscape in Africa, highlighting the importance of health data sciences in the region and identifying potential opportunities for application and growth by leveraging health data sciences to improve CVD outcomes.
Recent findings: While there have been a number of initiatives aimed at developing health data sciences in Africa over the recent decades, the progress and growth are still in their early stages. Its maximum potential can be leveraged through adequate funding, advanced training programs, focused resource allocation, encouraging bidirectional international partnerships, instituting best ethical practices, and prioritizing data science health research in the region. The findings of this review explore the current landscape of CVD and highlight the potential benefits and utility of health data sciences to address CVD challenges in Africa. By understanding and overcoming the barriers associated with health data sciences training, research, and application in the region, focused initiatives can be developed to promote research and development. These efforts will allow policymakers to form informed, evidence-based frameworks for the prevention and management of CVDs, and ultimately result in improved CVD outcomes in the region.
{"title":"Health Data Sciences and Cardiovascular Disease in Africa: Needs and the Way Forward.","authors":"Maha Inam, Sana Sheikh, Adeel Khoja, Amina Abubakar, Reena Shah, Zainab Samad, Anthony Ngugi, Farhana Alarakhiya, Akbar Waljee, Salim S Virani","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01235-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-024-01235-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The rising burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Africa is of great concern. Health data sciences is a rapidly developing field which has the potential to improve health outcomes, especially in low-middle income countries with burdened healthcare systems. We aim to explore the current CVD landscape in Africa, highlighting the importance of health data sciences in the region and identifying potential opportunities for application and growth by leveraging health data sciences to improve CVD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While there have been a number of initiatives aimed at developing health data sciences in Africa over the recent decades, the progress and growth are still in their early stages. Its maximum potential can be leveraged through adequate funding, advanced training programs, focused resource allocation, encouraging bidirectional international partnerships, instituting best ethical practices, and prioritizing data science health research in the region. The findings of this review explore the current landscape of CVD and highlight the potential benefits and utility of health data sciences to address CVD challenges in Africa. By understanding and overcoming the barriers associated with health data sciences training, research, and application in the region, focused initiatives can be developed to promote research and development. These efforts will allow policymakers to form informed, evidence-based frameworks for the prevention and management of CVDs, and ultimately result in improved CVD outcomes in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01233-3
Kartik Gupta, Vashma Junaid, Muhammad Ahmad Qureshi, Abhishek Gupta, Sana Sheikh, Mayank Dalakoti, Salim S Virani, Adeel Khoja
Purpose of review: Health data sciences can help mitigate high burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) management in South Asia by increasing availability and affordability of healthcare services. This review explores the current landscape, challenges, and strategies for leveraging digital health technologies to improve CVD outcomes in the region.
Recent findings: Several South Asian countries are implementing national digital health strategies that aim to provide unique health account numbers for patients, creating longitudinal digital health records while others aim to digitize healthcare services and improve health outcomes. Significant challenges impede progress, including lack of interoperability, inadequate training of healthcare workers, cultural barriers, and data privacy concerns. Leveraging digital health for CVD management involves using big data for early detection, employing artificial intelligence for diagnostics, and integrating multiomics data for health insights. Addressing these challenges through policy frameworks, capacity building, and international cooperation is crucial for improving CVD outcomes in region.
{"title":"Health Data Sciences and Cardiovascular Diseases in South Asia: Innovations and Challenges in Digital Health.","authors":"Kartik Gupta, Vashma Junaid, Muhammad Ahmad Qureshi, Abhishek Gupta, Sana Sheikh, Mayank Dalakoti, Salim S Virani, Adeel Khoja","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01233-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-024-01233-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Health data sciences can help mitigate high burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) management in South Asia by increasing availability and affordability of healthcare services. This review explores the current landscape, challenges, and strategies for leveraging digital health technologies to improve CVD outcomes in the region.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several South Asian countries are implementing national digital health strategies that aim to provide unique health account numbers for patients, creating longitudinal digital health records while others aim to digitize healthcare services and improve health outcomes. Significant challenges impede progress, including lack of interoperability, inadequate training of healthcare workers, cultural barriers, and data privacy concerns. Leveraging digital health for CVD management involves using big data for early detection, employing artificial intelligence for diagnostics, and integrating multiomics data for health insights. Addressing these challenges through policy frameworks, capacity building, and international cooperation is crucial for improving CVD outcomes in region.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-24DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01221-7
Malek Nayfeh, Helene DiGregorio, Jean Michel Saad, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Mahmoud Al Rifai
Purpose of review: In this review, we aimed to summarize the different aspects of the field of cardio-rheumatology, the role of the cardio-rheumatologist, and future research in the field.
Recent findings: Cardio-rheumatology is an emerging subspecialty within cardiology that focuses on addressing the intricate relationship between systemic inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. It involves understanding the cardiovascular impact of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on the heart and vascular system. A cardio-rheumatologist's role is multifaceted. First, they should understand the cardiac manifestations of rheumatological diseases. They should also be knowledgeable about the different immunotherapies available and side effects. Additionally, they should know how to utilize imaging modalities, either for diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment monitoring. This field is constantly evolving with new research on both treatment and imaging of the effects of inflammation on the cardiovascular system.
{"title":"The Emerging Specialty of Cardio-Rheumatology.","authors":"Malek Nayfeh, Helene DiGregorio, Jean Michel Saad, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Mahmoud Al Rifai","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01221-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11883-024-01221-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In this review, we aimed to summarize the different aspects of the field of cardio-rheumatology, the role of the cardio-rheumatologist, and future research in the field.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Cardio-rheumatology is an emerging subspecialty within cardiology that focuses on addressing the intricate relationship between systemic inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. It involves understanding the cardiovascular impact of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on the heart and vascular system. A cardio-rheumatologist's role is multifaceted. First, they should understand the cardiac manifestations of rheumatological diseases. They should also be knowledgeable about the different immunotherapies available and side effects. Additionally, they should know how to utilize imaging modalities, either for diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment monitoring. This field is constantly evolving with new research on both treatment and imaging of the effects of inflammation on the cardiovascular system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01227-1
Matthew R Deshotels, Prasanti Alekhya Kotta, Juan Simon Rico Mesa, Olamide Adeola Oyenubi, Vijay Nambi
Purpose of review: The risk of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention is typically lower than in secondary prevention. However, there is a spectrum of risk among individuals undergoing primary prevention with the risk in some individuals approaching those of secondary prevention. We review the clinical conditions wherein the risk in primary prevention is similar to that observed in secondary prevention.
Recent findings: Among individuals without established ASCVD, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores ≥ 300 AU are associated with ASCVD event rates similar to secondary prevention populations. CAC score ≥ 1,000 AU are associated with an ASCVD risk seen in very high-risk secondary prevention populations. Interpretation of these observations must however consider differences in the risk reduction strategies. Current guidelines dichotomize ASCVD prevention into primary and secondary prevention, but certain primary prevention patients have an ASCVD risk equivalent to that of secondary prevention populations. Identifying higher risk primary prevention populations will allow for better risk mitigation strategies.
审查目的:一级预防发生动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险通常低于二级预防。然而,在接受一级预防的人群中存在不同程度的风险,有些人的风险接近二级预防的风险。我们回顾了一级预防风险与二级预防风险相似的临床情况:最新发现:在未确诊为 ASCVD 的人群中,冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分≥ 300 AU 与 ASCVD 事件发生率相关,与二级预防人群相似。CAC 评分≥ 1,000 AU 与极高风险的二级预防人群的 ASCVD 风险有关。但是,对这些观察结果的解释必须考虑降低风险策略的差异。目前的指南将 ASCVD 预防分为一级预防和二级预防,但某些一级预防患者的 ASCVD 风险与二级预防人群相当。识别风险较高的一级预防人群将有助于制定更好的风险缓解策略。
{"title":"When Does Primary Prevention Encroach on Secondary Prevention?","authors":"Matthew R Deshotels, Prasanti Alekhya Kotta, Juan Simon Rico Mesa, Olamide Adeola Oyenubi, Vijay Nambi","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01227-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11883-024-01227-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The risk of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention is typically lower than in secondary prevention. However, there is a spectrum of risk among individuals undergoing primary prevention with the risk in some individuals approaching those of secondary prevention. We review the clinical conditions wherein the risk in primary prevention is similar to that observed in secondary prevention.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Among individuals without established ASCVD, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores ≥ 300 AU are associated with ASCVD event rates similar to secondary prevention populations. CAC score ≥ 1,000 AU are associated with an ASCVD risk seen in very high-risk secondary prevention populations. Interpretation of these observations must however consider differences in the risk reduction strategies. Current guidelines dichotomize ASCVD prevention into primary and secondary prevention, but certain primary prevention patients have an ASCVD risk equivalent to that of secondary prevention populations. Identifying higher risk primary prevention populations will allow for better risk mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-09DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01226-2
Logan Brown, Claire Cambron, Wendy S Post, Eric J Brandt
Purpose of review: This review seeks to provide important information on each of the major domains of social determinants of health (SDOH) in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Recent findings: SDOH can be classified into five domains: social and community context, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, economic stability, and education access and quality. SDOH are major drivers for cardiovascular health outcomes that exceed the impact from traditional risk factors, and explain inequities in health outcomes observed across different groups of individuals. SDOH profoundly impacts healthcare's receipt, delivery, and outcomes. Many patients fall within various disenfranchised groups (e.g., identify with minority race, low socioeconomic status, low educational attainment, LGBTQ+), which impact overall health status and care. Learning to understand, recognize, and address SDOH as the driving force of disparities are critical for achieving health equity in the prevention and adequate treatment of ASCVD.
{"title":"The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Logan Brown, Claire Cambron, Wendy S Post, Eric J Brandt","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01226-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11883-024-01226-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review seeks to provide important information on each of the major domains of social determinants of health (SDOH) in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>SDOH can be classified into five domains: social and community context, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, economic stability, and education access and quality. SDOH are major drivers for cardiovascular health outcomes that exceed the impact from traditional risk factors, and explain inequities in health outcomes observed across different groups of individuals. SDOH profoundly impacts healthcare's receipt, delivery, and outcomes. Many patients fall within various disenfranchised groups (e.g., identify with minority race, low socioeconomic status, low educational attainment, LGBTQ+), which impact overall health status and care. Learning to understand, recognize, and address SDOH as the driving force of disparities are critical for achieving health equity in the prevention and adequate treatment of ASCVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141558336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-03DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01224-4
Yasser A Jamil, Rachel Cohen, Dana K Alameddine, Salil V Deo, Manish Kumar, Ariela R Orkaby
Purpose of review: Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies.
Recent findings: The relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.
{"title":"Cholesterol Lowering in Older Adults: Should We Wait for Further Evidence?","authors":"Yasser A Jamil, Rachel Cohen, Dana K Alameddine, Salil V Deo, Manish Kumar, Ariela R Orkaby","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01224-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11883-024-01224-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141491205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-05DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01225-3
Giosiana Bosco, Reed Mszar, Salvatore Piro, Pierre Sabouret, Antonio Gallo
Purpose of the review: This review aims to assess the variability in considering hypercholesterolemia for cardiovascular risk stratification in the general population. Recent literature on the integration of hypercholesterolemia into clinical risk scores and its interaction with other risk factors will be explored.
Recent findings: The impact of hypercholesterolemia on risk estimation varies among different cardiovascular risk calculators. Elevated lipid levels during early life stages contribute to atherosclerotic plaque development, influencing disease severity despite later treatment initiation. The interplay between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), inflammatory markers and non-LDL lipid parameters enhances cardiovascular risk stratification. Studies have also examined the role of coronary artery calcium (CAC) score as a negative risk marker in populations with severe hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores (PRS) may aid in diagnosing non-monogenic hypercholesterolemia, refining cardiovascular risk stratification and guiding lipid-lowering therapy strategies. Understanding the heterogeneity in risk estimation and the role of emerging biomarkers and imaging techniques is crucial for optimizing cardiovascular risk prediction and guiding personalized treatment strategies in individuals with hypercholesterolemia.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Stratification Among Individuals with Hypercholesterolemia.","authors":"Giosiana Bosco, Reed Mszar, Salvatore Piro, Pierre Sabouret, Antonio Gallo","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01225-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11883-024-01225-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>This review aims to assess the variability in considering hypercholesterolemia for cardiovascular risk stratification in the general population. Recent literature on the integration of hypercholesterolemia into clinical risk scores and its interaction with other risk factors will be explored.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The impact of hypercholesterolemia on risk estimation varies among different cardiovascular risk calculators. Elevated lipid levels during early life stages contribute to atherosclerotic plaque development, influencing disease severity despite later treatment initiation. The interplay between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), inflammatory markers and non-LDL lipid parameters enhances cardiovascular risk stratification. Studies have also examined the role of coronary artery calcium (CAC) score as a negative risk marker in populations with severe hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores (PRS) may aid in diagnosing non-monogenic hypercholesterolemia, refining cardiovascular risk stratification and guiding lipid-lowering therapy strategies. Understanding the heterogeneity in risk estimation and the role of emerging biomarkers and imaging techniques is crucial for optimizing cardiovascular risk prediction and guiding personalized treatment strategies in individuals with hypercholesterolemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141533919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Evaluation of social influences on cardiovascular care requires a comprehensive analysis encompassing economic, societal, and environmental factors. The increased utilization of electronic health registries provides a foundation for social phenotyping, yet standardization in methodology remains lacking. This review aimed to elucidate the primary approaches to social phenotyping for cardiovascular risk stratification through electronic health registries.
Recent findings: Social phenotyping in the context of cardiovascular risk stratification within electronic health registries can be separated into four principal approaches: place-based metrics, questionnaires, ICD Z-coding, and natural language processing. These methodologies vary in their complexity, advantages and limitations, and intended outcomes. Place-based metrics often rely on geospatial data to infer socioeconomic influences, while questionnaires may directly gather individual-level behavioral and social factors. Z-coding, a relatively new approach, can capture data directly related to social determinant of health domains in the clinical context. Natural language processing has been increasingly utilized to extract social influences from unstructured clinical narratives-offering nuanced insights for risk prediction models. Each method plays an important role in our understanding and approach to using social determinants data for improving population cardiovascular health. These four principal approaches to social phenotyping contribute to a more structured approach to social determinant of health research via electronic health registries, with a focus on cardiovascular risk stratification. Social phenotyping related research should prioritize refining predictive models for cardiovascular diseases and advancing health equity by integrating applied implementation science into public health strategies.
综述的目的:评估对心血管护理的社会影响需要对经济、社会和环境因素进行综合分析。电子健康登记册的使用率越来越高,为社会表型分析提供了基础,但仍缺乏标准化的方法。本综述旨在阐明通过电子健康登记进行心血管风险分层的社会表型的主要方法:在电子健康登记中进行心血管风险分层的社会表型分析可分为四种主要方法:基于地点的度量、问卷调查、ICD Z 编码和自然语言处理。这些方法的复杂程度、优势和局限性以及预期结果各不相同。基于地点的度量通常依靠地理空间数据来推断社会经济影响因素,而问卷调查则可以直接收集个人层面的行为和社会因素。Z 编码是一种相对较新的方法,可在临床环境中获取与健康的社会决定因素领域直接相关的数据。人们越来越多地利用自然语言处理技术从非结构化的临床叙述中提取社会影响因素,从而为风险预测模型提供细致入微的见解。每种方法都在我们理解和利用社会决定因素数据改善人群心血管健康方面发挥着重要作用。社会表型的这四种主要方法有助于通过电子健康登记对健康的社会决定因素进行更有条理的研究,重点是心血管风险分层。社会表型相关研究应优先完善心血管疾病的预测模型,并通过将应用实施科学纳入公共卫生战略来促进健康公平。
{"title":"Social Phenotyping for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Electronic Health Registries.","authors":"Ramzi Ibrahim, Hoang Nhat Pham, Sarju Ganatra, Zulqarnain Javed, Khurram Nasir, Sadeer Al-Kindi","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01222-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11883-024-01222-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Evaluation of social influences on cardiovascular care requires a comprehensive analysis encompassing economic, societal, and environmental factors. The increased utilization of electronic health registries provides a foundation for social phenotyping, yet standardization in methodology remains lacking. This review aimed to elucidate the primary approaches to social phenotyping for cardiovascular risk stratification through electronic health registries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Social phenotyping in the context of cardiovascular risk stratification within electronic health registries can be separated into four principal approaches: place-based metrics, questionnaires, ICD Z-coding, and natural language processing. These methodologies vary in their complexity, advantages and limitations, and intended outcomes. Place-based metrics often rely on geospatial data to infer socioeconomic influences, while questionnaires may directly gather individual-level behavioral and social factors. Z-coding, a relatively new approach, can capture data directly related to social determinant of health domains in the clinical context. Natural language processing has been increasingly utilized to extract social influences from unstructured clinical narratives-offering nuanced insights for risk prediction models. Each method plays an important role in our understanding and approach to using social determinants data for improving population cardiovascular health. These four principal approaches to social phenotyping contribute to a more structured approach to social determinant of health research via electronic health registries, with a focus on cardiovascular risk stratification. Social phenotyping related research should prioritize refining predictive models for cardiovascular diseases and advancing health equity by integrating applied implementation science into public health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}