Tom Reuvekamp, Luca L. G. Janssen, Lok Lam Ngai, Jannemieke Carbaat-Ham, Daphne den Hartog, Willemijn J. Scholten, Angèle Kelder, Diana Hanekamp, Eliza Wensink, Noortje van Gils, Patrycja Gradowska, Bob Löwenberg, Gert J. Ossenkoppele, Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht, Theresia M. Westers, Linda Smit, Costa Bachas, Jacqueline Cloos
The most important reason for dismal outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the development of relapse. Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are hypothesized to initiate relapse, and high CD34+CD38− LSC load is associated with poor prognosis. In 10% of AML patients, CD34 is not or is low expressed on the leukemic cells (<1%), and CD34+CD38− LSCs are absent. These patients are classified as CD34-negative. We aimed to determine whether the primitive marker CD133 can detect LSCs in CD34-negative AML. We retrospectively quantified 148 CD34-negative patients for proportions of CD34−CD133+ and CD133+CD38− cell fractions in the diagnostic samples of CD34-negative patients in the HOVON102 and HOVON132 trials. No prognostic difference was found between patients with high or low proportions of CD34−CD133+, which is found to be aberrantly expressed in AML. A high level of CD133+CD38− cells was not associated with poor overall survival, and expression in AML was similar to normal bone marrow. To conclude, CD133 is useful as an additional primitive marker for the detection of leukemic blast cells in CD34-negative AML. However, CD133+CD38 alone is not suitable for the detection of LSCs at diagnosis.
{"title":"The role of the primitive marker CD133 in CD34-negative acute myeloid leukemia for the detection of leukemia stem cells","authors":"Tom Reuvekamp, Luca L. G. Janssen, Lok Lam Ngai, Jannemieke Carbaat-Ham, Daphne den Hartog, Willemijn J. Scholten, Angèle Kelder, Diana Hanekamp, Eliza Wensink, Noortje van Gils, Patrycja Gradowska, Bob Löwenberg, Gert J. Ossenkoppele, Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht, Theresia M. Westers, Linda Smit, Costa Bachas, Jacqueline Cloos","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22201","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22201","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The most important reason for dismal outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the development of relapse. Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are hypothesized to initiate relapse, and high CD34+CD38− LSC load is associated with poor prognosis. In 10% of AML patients, CD34 is not or is low expressed on the leukemic cells (<1%), and CD34+CD38− LSCs are absent. These patients are classified as CD34-negative. We aimed to determine whether the primitive marker CD133 can detect LSCs in CD34-negative AML. We retrospectively quantified 148 CD34-negative patients for proportions of CD34−CD133+ and CD133+CD38− cell fractions in the diagnostic samples of CD34-negative patients in the HOVON102 and HOVON132 trials. No prognostic difference was found between patients with high or low proportions of CD34−CD133+, which is found to be aberrantly expressed in AML. A high level of CD133+CD38− cells was not associated with poor overall survival, and expression in AML was similar to normal bone marrow. To conclude, CD133 is useful as an additional primitive marker for the detection of leukemic blast cells in CD34-negative AML. However, CD133+CD38 alone is not suitable for the detection of LSCs at diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"108 1","pages":"23-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22201","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara A Monaghan, Steven Eck, Silvia Bunting, Xiangyang X Dong, Robert J Durso, Christele Gonneau, Amanda Hays, Andrea Illingworth, Stacy C League, Eleni Linskens, Megan McCausland, Thomas W McCloskey, Nina Rolf, Min Shi, Paul K Wallace, Virginia Litwin, Wolfgang Kern, George Deeb, Veronica Nash, Horatiu Olteanu
The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62-Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit-for-purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory-initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).
{"title":"Flow cytometry assay modifications: Recommendations for method validation based on CLSI H62 guidelines.","authors":"Sara A Monaghan, Steven Eck, Silvia Bunting, Xiangyang X Dong, Robert J Durso, Christele Gonneau, Amanda Hays, Andrea Illingworth, Stacy C League, Eleni Linskens, Megan McCausland, Thomas W McCloskey, Nina Rolf, Min Shi, Paul K Wallace, Virginia Litwin, Wolfgang Kern, George Deeb, Veronica Nash, Horatiu Olteanu","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.22202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62-Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit-for-purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory-initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142008459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Øystein Sefland, Stein-Erik Gullaksen, Maria Omsland, Håkon Reikvam, Eivind Galteland, Hoa Thi Tuyet Tran, Signe Spetalen, Satwinder Kaur Singh, Hester J. T. Van Zeeburg, Arjan A. Van De Loosdrecht, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is detected in approximately a quarter of AML chemotherapy responders, serving as a predictor for relapse and shorter survival. Immunological control of residual disease is suggested to prevent relapse, but the mechanisms involved are not fully understood. We present a peripheral blood single cell immune profiling by mass cytometry using a 42-antibody panel with particular emphasis on markers of cellular immune response. Six healthy donors were compared with four AML patients with MRD (MRD+) in first complete remission (CR1MRD+). Three of four patients demonstrated a favorable genetic risk profile, while the fourth patient had an unfavorable risk profile (complex karyotype, TP53-mutation) and a high level of MRD. Unsupervised clustering using self-organizing maps and dimensional reduction analysis was performed for visualization and analysis of immune cell subsets. CD57+ natural killer (NK)-cell subsets were found to be less abundant in patients than in healthy donors. Both T and NK cells demonstrated elevated expression of activity and maturation markers (CD44, granzyme B, and phosho-STAT5 Y694) in patients. Although mass cytometry remains an expensive method with limited scalability, our data suggest the utility for employing a 42-plex profiling for cellular immune surveillance in whole blood, and possibly as a biomarker platform in future clinical trials. The findings encourage further investigations of single cell immune profiling in CR1MRD+ AML-patients.
大约四分之一的急性髓细胞性白血病化疗应答者会检测到可测量的残留疾病(MRD),这是导致复发和生存期缩短的一个预测因素。有人建议对残留病进行免疫控制以防止复发,但其中的机制尚未完全明了。我们通过质谱细胞计数法对外周血单细胞免疫谱进行了分析,使用了 42 种抗体,特别强调了细胞免疫反应的标记物。我们将六名健康捐献者与四名首次完全缓解(CR1MRD+)的 MRD(MRD+)急性髓细胞白血病患者进行了比较。四名患者中有三人的遗传风险状况良好,而第四名患者的风险状况不佳(复杂核型、TP53突变),且MRD水平较高。利用自组织图和降维分析进行了无监督聚类,以实现免疫细胞亚群的可视化和分析。研究发现,与健康供体相比,患者体内CD57+自然杀伤(NK)细胞亚群的数量较少。患者体内 T 细胞和 NK 细胞的活性和成熟标志物(CD44、颗粒酶 B 和 phosho-STAT5 Y694)的表达均有所升高。虽然质谱法仍然是一种昂贵的方法,可扩展性有限,但我们的数据表明,采用 42 复合物分析法进行全血细胞免疫监视是有用的,并有可能在未来的临床试验中用作生物标记物平台。这些发现鼓励我们进一步研究 CR1MRD+ AML 患者的单细胞免疫分析。
{"title":"Mass cytometric single cell immune profiles of peripheral blood from acute myeloid leukemia patients in complete remission with measurable residual disease","authors":"Øystein Sefland, Stein-Erik Gullaksen, Maria Omsland, Håkon Reikvam, Eivind Galteland, Hoa Thi Tuyet Tran, Signe Spetalen, Satwinder Kaur Singh, Hester J. T. Van Zeeburg, Arjan A. Van De Loosdrecht, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22197","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22197","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measurable residual disease (MRD) is detected in approximately a quarter of AML chemotherapy responders, serving as a predictor for relapse and shorter survival. Immunological control of residual disease is suggested to prevent relapse, but the mechanisms involved are not fully understood. We present a peripheral blood single cell immune profiling by mass cytometry using a 42-antibody panel with particular emphasis on markers of cellular immune response. Six healthy donors were compared with four AML patients with MRD (MRD<sup>+</sup>) in first complete remission (CR1<sub>MRD+</sub>). Three of four patients demonstrated a favorable genetic risk profile, while the fourth patient had an unfavorable risk profile (complex karyotype, TP53-mutation) and a high level of MRD. Unsupervised clustering using self-organizing maps and dimensional reduction analysis was performed for visualization and analysis of immune cell subsets. CD57<sup>+</sup> natural killer (NK)-cell subsets were found to be less abundant in patients than in healthy donors. Both T and NK cells demonstrated elevated expression of activity and maturation markers (CD44, granzyme B, and phosho-STAT5 Y694) in patients. Although mass cytometry remains an expensive method with limited scalability, our data suggest the utility for employing a 42-plex profiling for cellular immune surveillance in whole blood, and possibly as a biomarker platform in future clinical trials. The findings encourage further investigations of single cell immune profiling in CR1<sub>MRD+</sub> AML-patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"106 6","pages":"485-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22197","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katherine A. Devitt, Wolfgang Kern, Malgorzata A. Kajstura, Eda K. Holl, Amanda L. Hays, Benjamin D. Hedley, Christèle Gonneau, Evan R. Jellison, Thomas W. McCloskey, Shruti Mishra, Jennifer Rebeles, Madhu M. Ouseph
The publication of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's guideline H62 has provided the flow cytometry community with much-needed guidance on development and validation of flow cytometric assays (CLSI, 2021). It has also paved the way for additional exploration of certain topics requiring additional guidance. Flow cytometric analysis of rare matrices, or unique and/or less frequently encountered specimen types, is one such topic and is the focus of this manuscript. This document is the result of a collaboration subject matter experts from a diverse range of backgrounds and seeks to provide best practice consensus guidance regarding these types of specimens. Herein, we define rare matrix samples in the setting of flow cytometric analysis, address validation implications and challenges with these samples, and describe important considerations of using these samples in both clinical and research settings.
{"title":"Implementation of flow cytometry testing on rare matrix samples: Special considerations and best practices when the sample is unique or difficult to obtain","authors":"Katherine A. Devitt, Wolfgang Kern, Malgorzata A. Kajstura, Eda K. Holl, Amanda L. Hays, Benjamin D. Hedley, Christèle Gonneau, Evan R. Jellison, Thomas W. McCloskey, Shruti Mishra, Jennifer Rebeles, Madhu M. Ouseph","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22198","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22198","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The publication of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's guideline H62 has provided the flow cytometry community with much-needed guidance on development and validation of flow cytometric assays (CLSI, 2021). It has also paved the way for additional exploration of certain topics requiring additional guidance. Flow cytometric analysis of rare matrices, or unique and/or less frequently encountered specimen types, is one such topic and is the focus of this manuscript. This document is the result of a collaboration subject matter experts from a diverse range of backgrounds and seeks to provide best practice consensus guidance regarding these types of specimens. Herein, we define rare matrix samples in the setting of flow cytometric analysis, address validation implications and challenges with these samples, and describe important considerations of using these samples in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"108 1","pages":"77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22198","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141731100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jerome S. Arceneaux, Asa A. Brockman, Rohit Khurana, Mary-Bronwen L. Chalkley, Laura C. Geben, Aleksandar Krbanjevic, Matthew Vestal, Muhammad Zafar, Sarah Weatherspoon, Bret C. Mobley, Kevin C. Ess, Rebecca A. Ihrie
The advent of high-dimensional imaging offers new opportunities to molecularly characterize diagnostic cells in disorders that have previously relied on histopathological definitions. One example case is found in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a developmental disorder characterized by systemic growth of benign tumors. Within resected brain tissues from patients with TSC, detection of abnormally enlarged balloon cells (BCs) is pathognomonic for this disorder. Though BCs can be identified by an expert neuropathologist, little is known about the specificity and broad applicability of protein markers for these cells, complicating classification of proposed BCs identified in experimental models of this disorder. Here, we report the development of a customized machine learning pipeline (BAlloon IDENtifier; BAIDEN) that was trained to prospectively identify BCs in tissue sections using a histological stain compatible with high-dimensional cytometry. This approach was coupled to a custom 36-antibody panel and imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to explore the expression of multiple previously proposed BC marker proteins and develop a descriptor of BC features conserved across multiple tissue samples from patients with TSC. Here, we present a modular workflow encompassing BAIDEN, a custom antibody panel, a control sample microarray, and analysis pipelines—both open-source and in-house—and apply this workflow to understand the abundance, structure, and signaling activity of BCs as an example case of how high-dimensional imaging can be applied within human tissues.
高维成像技术的出现为诊断细胞的分子特征提供了新的机会,而这些诊断细胞以前一直依赖于组织病理学定义。结节性硬化综合征(TSC)就是一个例子,这是一种以良性肿瘤的系统性生长为特征的发育障碍。在 TSC 患者切除的脑组织中,发现异常增大的气球细胞(BC)是这种疾病的病理标志。虽然神经病理学家可以鉴定出气球细胞,但对这些细胞的蛋白质标记物的特异性和广泛适用性却知之甚少,这使得在该疾病的实验模型中鉴定出的气球细胞的分类变得更加复杂。在此,我们报告了定制机器学习管道(BAlloon IDENtifier; BAIDEN)的开发情况,该管道经过训练,可使用与高维细胞仪兼容的组织学染色法在组织切片中前瞻性地识别 BCs。这种方法与定制的 36 种抗体面板和成像质谱(IMC)相结合,探索了之前提出的多种 BC 标记蛋白的表达情况,并开发出了在 TSC 患者的多个组织样本中保持一致的 BC 特征描述。在这里,我们介绍了一种模块化工作流程,其中包括 BAIDEN、定制抗体面板、对照样本微阵列和分析管道(包括开源和内部管道),并将该工作流程应用于了解 BC 的丰度、结构和信号活动,以此作为高维成像如何应用于人体组织的一个示例。
{"title":"Multiparameter quantitative analyses of diagnostic cells in brain tissues from tuberous sclerosis complex","authors":"Jerome S. Arceneaux, Asa A. Brockman, Rohit Khurana, Mary-Bronwen L. Chalkley, Laura C. Geben, Aleksandar Krbanjevic, Matthew Vestal, Muhammad Zafar, Sarah Weatherspoon, Bret C. Mobley, Kevin C. Ess, Rebecca A. Ihrie","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22194","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22194","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The advent of high-dimensional imaging offers new opportunities to molecularly characterize diagnostic cells in disorders that have previously relied on histopathological definitions. One example case is found in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a developmental disorder characterized by systemic growth of benign tumors. Within resected brain tissues from patients with TSC, detection of abnormally enlarged balloon cells (BCs) is pathognomonic for this disorder. Though BCs can be identified by an expert neuropathologist, little is known about the specificity and broad applicability of protein markers for these cells, complicating classification of proposed BCs identified in experimental models of this disorder. Here, we report the development of a customized machine learning pipeline (BAlloon IDENtifier; BAIDEN) that was trained to prospectively identify BCs in tissue sections using a histological stain compatible with high-dimensional cytometry. This approach was coupled to a custom 36-antibody panel and imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to explore the expression of multiple previously proposed BC marker proteins and develop a descriptor of BC features conserved across multiple tissue samples from patients with TSC. Here, we present a modular workflow encompassing BAIDEN, a custom antibody panel, a control sample microarray, and analysis pipelines—both open-source and in-house—and apply this workflow to understand the abundance, structure, and signaling activity of BCs as an example case of how high-dimensional imaging can be applied within human tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"108 1","pages":"35-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693778/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141476152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hematologic neoplasms with germline predisposition have been increasingly recognized as a distinct category of tumors over the last few years. As such, this category was added to the World Health Organization (WHO) 4th edition as well as maintained in the WHO 5th edition and International Consensus Classification (ICC) 2022 classification systems. In practice, these tumors require a high index of suspicion and confirmation by molecular testing. Flow cytometry is a cost-effective diagnostic tool that is routinely performed on peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. In this review, we sought to summarize the current body of research correlating flow cytometric immunophenotype to assess its utility in diagnosis of and clinical decision making in germline hematologic neoplasms. We also illustrate these findings using cases mostly from our own institution. We review some of the more commonly mutated genes, including CEBPA, DDX41, RUNX1, ANKRD26, GATA2, Fanconi anemia, Noonan syndrome, and Down syndrome. We highlight that flow cytometry may have a role in the diagnosis (GATA2, Down syndrome) and screening (CEBPA) of some germline predisposition syndromes, although appears to show nonspecific findings in others (DDX41, RUNX1). In many of the others, such as ANKRD26, Fanconi anemia, and Noonan syndrome, further studies are needed to better understand whether specific flow cytometric patterns are observed. Ultimately, we conclude that further studies such as large case series and organized data pipelines are needed in most germline settings to better understand the flow cytometric immunophenotype of these neoplasms.
{"title":"Updates on germline predisposition in pediatric hematologic malignancies: What is the role of flow cytometry?","authors":"Nadine Demko, Julia T. Geyer","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22192","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22192","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hematologic neoplasms with germline predisposition have been increasingly recognized as a distinct category of tumors over the last few years. As such, this category was added to the World Health Organization (WHO) 4th edition as well as maintained in the WHO 5th edition and International Consensus Classification (ICC) 2022 classification systems. In practice, these tumors require a high index of suspicion and confirmation by molecular testing. Flow cytometry is a cost-effective diagnostic tool that is routinely performed on peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. In this review, we sought to summarize the current body of research correlating flow cytometric immunophenotype to assess its utility in diagnosis of and clinical decision making in germline hematologic neoplasms. We also illustrate these findings using cases mostly from our own institution. We review some of the more commonly mutated genes, including <i>CEBPA, DDX41, RUNX1, ANKRD26, GATA2</i>, Fanconi anemia, Noonan syndrome, and Down syndrome. We highlight that flow cytometry may have a role in the diagnosis (<i>GATA2</i>, Down syndrome) and screening (<i>CEBPA</i>) of some germline predisposition syndromes, although appears to show nonspecific findings in others (<i>DDX41, RUNX1</i>). In many of the others, such as <i>ANKRD26</i>, Fanconi anemia, and Noonan syndrome, further studies are needed to better understand whether specific flow cytometric patterns are observed. Ultimately, we conclude that further studies such as large case series and organized data pipelines are needed in most germline settings to better understand the flow cytometric immunophenotype of these neoplasms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"106 5","pages":"331-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141466792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Morgane Gossez, Benjamin Bonnet, Ismael Boussaid, Nicolas Chapuis, Sylvie Cointe, Maxime Cravat, Marcelo De Carvalho Bittencourt, Francoise Dignat-George, Bertrand Evrard, Robin Jeannet, Georges Jourdi, Claire Lozano, Stephane Paul, Virginie Siguret, Louis Waeckel, Guillaume Monneret
{"title":"Multicenter inter-laboratory quality control of monocyte HLA-DR expression by flow cytometry","authors":"Morgane Gossez, Benjamin Bonnet, Ismael Boussaid, Nicolas Chapuis, Sylvie Cointe, Maxime Cravat, Marcelo De Carvalho Bittencourt, Francoise Dignat-George, Bertrand Evrard, Robin Jeannet, Georges Jourdi, Claire Lozano, Stephane Paul, Virginie Siguret, Louis Waeckel, Guillaume Monneret","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22196","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22196","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"108 1","pages":"95-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141455754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anu Singh, Jagruti Patil, Sitaram G. Ghogale, Nilesh Deshpande, Karishma Girase, Navami Shetye, Sweta Rajpal, Gaurav Chatterjee, Nikhil Patkar, Disha Jain, Sridhar Epari, Tanuja Shet, Sumeet Gujral, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Prashant R. Tembhare
Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) is crucial in detecting occult or minimal bone marrow (BM) involvement by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), which may not be detected using trephine biopsy or imaging studies. Detection of low-level BM involvement can be challenging without definite immunophenotypic aberrancies. We studied the utility of CD305 in MFC detection of minimal BM involvement by B-NHL, especially in the absence of aberrancies by commonly used markers. The study included 1084 consecutive BM samples submitted for the staging of B-NHLs (excluding CLL) over two years. Samples were studied for morphological, immunophenotypic, and histopathological assessment. MFC studies were performed using 10–13 color MFC, including CD305-antibody (clone, DX26). Minimal BM involvement was defined with a cutoff of ≤10% lymphoma cells in viable cells on MFC assessment. Of 1084, 148 samples revealed overt morphological involvement by B-NHL and were excluded from analysis. BM samples of 172/936 patients were morphologically negative but revealed involvement using MFC independently. Corresponding trephine biopsy involvement was detected in only 79/172 (45.9%) patients. On MFC, 23/172 samples showed BM involvement with >10% lymphoma cells, and 149/172 (86.6%) samples revealed minimal involvement. In 54/149 (36.24%) samples, lymphoma cells were detected only with aberrant loss of CD305 expression. In 78 of the remaining 95 samples (82.1%), it provided an immunophenotypic aberrancy addition to other markers and supported the results. CD305 is a highly useful marker in the flow cytometric assessment of minimal BM involvement by B-NHL. MFC is a superior modality to trephine biopsy in detecting low-level BM involvement.
{"title":"Utility of leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor-1 (CD305) in flow cytometric detection of minimal bone marrow involvement by B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma","authors":"Anu Singh, Jagruti Patil, Sitaram G. Ghogale, Nilesh Deshpande, Karishma Girase, Navami Shetye, Sweta Rajpal, Gaurav Chatterjee, Nikhil Patkar, Disha Jain, Sridhar Epari, Tanuja Shet, Sumeet Gujral, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Prashant R. Tembhare","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22193","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cyto.b.22193","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) is crucial in detecting occult or minimal bone marrow (BM) involvement by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), which may not be detected using trephine biopsy or imaging studies. Detection of low-level BM involvement can be challenging without definite immunophenotypic aberrancies. We studied the utility of CD305 in MFC detection of minimal BM involvement by B-NHL, especially in the absence of aberrancies by commonly used markers. The study included 1084 consecutive BM samples submitted for the staging of B-NHLs (excluding CLL) over two years. Samples were studied for morphological, immunophenotypic, and histopathological assessment. MFC studies were performed using 10–13 color MFC, including CD305-antibody (clone, DX26<b>)</b>. Minimal BM involvement was defined with a cutoff of ≤10% lymphoma cells in viable cells on MFC assessment. Of 1084, 148 samples revealed overt morphological involvement by B-NHL and were excluded from analysis. BM samples of 172/936 patients were morphologically negative but revealed involvement using MFC independently. Corresponding trephine biopsy involvement was detected in only 79/172 (45.9%) patients. On MFC, 23/172 samples showed BM involvement with >10% lymphoma cells, and 149/172 (86.6%) samples revealed minimal involvement. In 54/149 (36.24%) samples, lymphoma cells were detected only with aberrant loss of CD305 expression. In 78 of the remaining 95 samples (82.1%), it provided an immunophenotypic aberrancy addition to other markers and supported the results. CD305 is a highly useful marker in the flow cytometric assessment of minimal BM involvement by B-NHL. MFC is a superior modality to trephine biopsy in detecting low-level BM involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"106 5","pages":"359-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22193","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141509948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}