Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01510-6
Soumya Kurnool, Karen C McCowen, Nicole A Bernstein, Atul Malhotra
Purpose of review: To synthesize the existing literature regarding the complex interplay between sleep disturbance, obesity, and diabetes. The review emphasizes the three pillars of health being diet, exercise, and sleep, with the notion that if one is ignored, then the other two could suffer.
Recent findings: Sleep deprivation is associated with incident obesity, perhaps mediated by dysregulation in leptin and ghrelin - hormones important in regulation of appetite. Sleep apnea is very common particularly among obese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment of sleep apnea has clear symptomatic benefits although its impact on long-term cardiometabolic health is less clear. Sleep disturbance may be an important modifiable risk for patients at risk of cardiometabolic disease. An assessment of sleep health may be an important component of the comprehensive care of patients with obesity and diabetes mellitus.
{"title":"Sleep Apnea, Obesity, and Diabetes - an Intertwined Trio.","authors":"Soumya Kurnool, Karen C McCowen, Nicole A Bernstein, Atul Malhotra","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01510-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01510-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To synthesize the existing literature regarding the complex interplay between sleep disturbance, obesity, and diabetes. The review emphasizes the three pillars of health being diet, exercise, and sleep, with the notion that if one is ignored, then the other two could suffer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Sleep deprivation is associated with incident obesity, perhaps mediated by dysregulation in leptin and ghrelin - hormones important in regulation of appetite. Sleep apnea is very common particularly among obese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment of sleep apnea has clear symptomatic benefits although its impact on long-term cardiometabolic health is less clear. Sleep disturbance may be an important modifiable risk for patients at risk of cardiometabolic disease. An assessment of sleep health may be an important component of the comprehensive care of patients with obesity and diabetes mellitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 7","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239381/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9725136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01Epub Date: 2023-04-25DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01509-z
Sara L Davis, Sarah S Jaser, Nataliya V Ivankova, Trey Lemley, Marti Rice
Purpose of review: Many factors influence disease management and glycemic levels in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, these concepts are hard to examine in children using only a qualitative or quantitative research paradigm. Mixed methods research (MMR) offers creative and unique ways to study complex research questions in children and their families.
Recent findings: A focused, methodological literature review revealed 20 empirical mixed methods research (MMR) studies that included children with T1D and/or their parents/caregivers. These studies were examined and synthesized to elicit themes and trends in MMR. Main themes that emerged included disease management, evaluation of interventions, and support. There were multiple inconsistencies between studies when reporting MMR definitions, rationales, and design. Limited studies use MMR approaches to examine concepts related to children with T1D. Findings from future MMR studies, especially ones that use child-report, may illuminate ways to improve disease management and lead to better glycemic levels and health outcomes.
{"title":"Using Mixed Methods Research in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: a Methodological Review.","authors":"Sara L Davis, Sarah S Jaser, Nataliya V Ivankova, Trey Lemley, Marti Rice","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01509-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11892-023-01509-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Many factors influence disease management and glycemic levels in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, these concepts are hard to examine in children using only a qualitative or quantitative research paradigm. Mixed methods research (MMR) offers creative and unique ways to study complex research questions in children and their families.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A focused, methodological literature review revealed 20 empirical mixed methods research (MMR) studies that included children with T1D and/or their parents/caregivers. These studies were examined and synthesized to elicit themes and trends in MMR. Main themes that emerged included disease management, evaluation of interventions, and support. There were multiple inconsistencies between studies when reporting MMR definitions, rationales, and design. Limited studies use MMR approaches to examine concepts related to children with T1D. Findings from future MMR studies, especially ones that use child-report, may illuminate ways to improve disease management and lead to better glycemic levels and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 7","pages":"147-163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651325/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9663012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01508-0
Calvin Ke, Emaad Mohammad, Juliana C N Chan, Alice P S Kong, Fok-Han Leung, Baiju R Shah, Douglas Lee, Andrea O Luk, Ronald C W Ma, Elaine Chow, Xiaolin Wei
Purpose of review: There are gaps in implementing and accessing team-based diabetes care. We reviewed and compared how team-based diabetes care was implemented in the primary care contexts of Ontario and Hong Kong.
Recent findings: Ontario's Diabetes Education Programs (DEPs) were scaled-up incrementally. Hong Kong's Multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Program for Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) evolved from a research-driven quality improvement program. Each jurisdiction had a mixture of non-team and team-based primary care with variable accessibility. Referral procedures, follow-up processes, and financing models varied. DEPs used a flexible approach, while the RAMP-DM used structured assessment for quality assurance. Each approach depended on adequate infrastructure, processes, and staff. Diabetes care is most accessible and functional when integrated team-based services are automatically initiated upon diabetes diagnosis within a strong primary care system, ideally linked to a register with supports including specialist care. Structured assessment and risk stratification are the basis of a well-studied, evidence-based approach for achieving the standards of team-based diabetes care, although flexibility in care delivery may be needed to meet the unique needs of some individuals. Policymakers and funders should ensure investment in skilled health professionals, infrastructure, and processes to improve care quality.
{"title":"Team-Based Diabetes Care in Ontario and Hong Kong: a Comparative Review.","authors":"Calvin Ke, Emaad Mohammad, Juliana C N Chan, Alice P S Kong, Fok-Han Leung, Baiju R Shah, Douglas Lee, Andrea O Luk, Ronald C W Ma, Elaine Chow, Xiaolin Wei","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01508-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01508-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There are gaps in implementing and accessing team-based diabetes care. We reviewed and compared how team-based diabetes care was implemented in the primary care contexts of Ontario and Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Ontario's Diabetes Education Programs (DEPs) were scaled-up incrementally. Hong Kong's Multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Program for Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) evolved from a research-driven quality improvement program. Each jurisdiction had a mixture of non-team and team-based primary care with variable accessibility. Referral procedures, follow-up processes, and financing models varied. DEPs used a flexible approach, while the RAMP-DM used structured assessment for quality assurance. Each approach depended on adequate infrastructure, processes, and staff. Diabetes care is most accessible and functional when integrated team-based services are automatically initiated upon diabetes diagnosis within a strong primary care system, ideally linked to a register with supports including specialist care. Structured assessment and risk stratification are the basis of a well-studied, evidence-based approach for achieving the standards of team-based diabetes care, although flexibility in care delivery may be needed to meet the unique needs of some individuals. Policymakers and funders should ensure investment in skilled health professionals, infrastructure, and processes to improve care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 7","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091345/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9674658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of diabetes in patients with hyperuricemia and gout.
Recent findings: Previous studies have confirmed that hyperuricemia and gout are associated with an increased risk of diabetes. A previous meta-analysis indicated that the prevalence of diabetes in patients with gout is 16%. Thirty-eight studies (458,256 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The combined prevalence of diabetes among patients with hyperuricemia and gout were 19.10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.60-20.60; I2 = 99.40%) and 16.70% (95% CI: 15.10-18.30; I2 = 99.30%), respectively. Patients from North America showed a higher prevalence of diabetes (hyperuricemia: 20.70% [95% CI: 16.80-24.60], gout: 20.70% [95% CI: 16.80-24.60]) than those from other continents. Older patients with hyperuricemia and those using diuretics showed a higher prevalence of diabetes than younger patients and those who were not using diuretics. Studies with a small sample size, case-control design, and low quality score had a higher prevalence of diabetes than studies with a large sample size, other designs, and a high quality score. The prevalence of diabetes among patients with hyperuricemia and gout is high. Controlling plasma glucose and uric acid levels of patients with hyperuricemia and gout is critical for the prevention of diabetes.
{"title":"Prevalence of Diabetes in Patients with Hyperuricemia and Gout: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Jinguo Jiang, Tingjing Zhang, Yashu Liu, Qing Chang, Yuhong Zhao, Chuanji Guo, Yang Xia","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01506-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01506-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of diabetes in patients with hyperuricemia and gout.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Previous studies have confirmed that hyperuricemia and gout are associated with an increased risk of diabetes. A previous meta-analysis indicated that the prevalence of diabetes in patients with gout is 16%. Thirty-eight studies (458,256 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The combined prevalence of diabetes among patients with hyperuricemia and gout were 19.10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.60-20.60; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.40%) and 16.70% (95% CI: 15.10-18.30; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.30%), respectively. Patients from North America showed a higher prevalence of diabetes (hyperuricemia: 20.70% [95% CI: 16.80-24.60], gout: 20.70% [95% CI: 16.80-24.60]) than those from other continents. Older patients with hyperuricemia and those using diuretics showed a higher prevalence of diabetes than younger patients and those who were not using diuretics. Studies with a small sample size, case-control design, and low quality score had a higher prevalence of diabetes than studies with a large sample size, other designs, and a high quality score. The prevalence of diabetes among patients with hyperuricemia and gout is high. Controlling plasma glucose and uric acid levels of patients with hyperuricemia and gout is critical for the prevention of diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 6","pages":"103-117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9428275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01505-3
Jamie Prince, Dipen Kumar, Arko Ghosh, J Fernando Arevalo, Alice Yang Zhang
Purpose of review: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the accumulation of fluid in the extracellular space within the macula and is a major cause of visual impairment among patients with diabetes. First-line treatment for DME includes pharmacotherapy with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications and intravitreal corticosteroids. Alternative therapeutic strategies include laser photocoagulation for non-center involving DME, and surgical options such as pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel in cases with vitreoretinal interface anomalies or DME refractory to pharmacotherapy, and the Port Delivery System (PDS) for sustained release of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medication. Our aim is to review the existing literature on surgical management of DME including imaging changes in chronic DME and the clinical relevance of surgical intervention.
Recent findings: Imaging changes associated with DME and a worse prognosis include disorganization of the retinal layer, disruption of both the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone, and vitreomacular interface abnormalities. Studies involving pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel show anatomic improvement but may not always be associated with significant change in visual outcomes. Early studies lacked detailed imaging of the retinal layers and PPV was likely performed as a last resort. In addition, the novel PDS is surgically implanted into the pars plana and works as a drug reservoir with controlled release of drug. However, it has been recalled in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration due to issues with dislodgement. Surgical interventions for DME include pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel and new surgical therapies for DME such as the PDS and subretinal gene therapy have the potential to reduce the risk of DME progression.
综述目的:糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是黄斑细胞外空间积液,是糖尿病患者视力受损的主要原因。二甲醚的一线治疗包括玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子药物和玻璃体内皮质类固醇药物治疗。其他治疗策略包括激光光凝治疗非中心性二甲醚,手术治疗如玻璃体部分玻璃体切除术(PPV)伴有或不伴有内限制膜(ILM)剥离的玻璃体视网膜界面异常或药物治疗难治的二甲醚,以及Port Delivery System (PDS)用于持续释放抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物。我们的目的是回顾二甲醚手术治疗的现有文献,包括慢性二甲醚的影像学改变和手术干预的临床意义。最近发现:与DME相关的影像学改变和较差的预后包括视网膜层紊乱,外限制膜(ELM)和椭球带破坏,以及玻璃体黄斑界面异常。有和没有ILM剥离的玻璃体部切除术的研究显示解剖改善,但可能并不总是与视力结果的显着变化相关。早期的研究缺乏视网膜层的详细成像,PPV可能是最后的手段。此外,新型PDS通过手术植入到计划部,作为药物储存库,控制药物释放。然而,由于脱位问题,它已被召回用于湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者。DME的手术干预措施包括带或不带ILM剥离的玻璃体切除,DME的新手术治疗方法如PDS和视网膜下基因治疗有可能降低DME进展的风险。
{"title":"Surgical Management of Diabetic Macular Edema.","authors":"Jamie Prince, Dipen Kumar, Arko Ghosh, J Fernando Arevalo, Alice Yang Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01505-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01505-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the accumulation of fluid in the extracellular space within the macula and is a major cause of visual impairment among patients with diabetes. First-line treatment for DME includes pharmacotherapy with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications and intravitreal corticosteroids. Alternative therapeutic strategies include laser photocoagulation for non-center involving DME, and surgical options such as pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel in cases with vitreoretinal interface anomalies or DME refractory to pharmacotherapy, and the Port Delivery System (PDS) for sustained release of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medication. Our aim is to review the existing literature on surgical management of DME including imaging changes in chronic DME and the clinical relevance of surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Imaging changes associated with DME and a worse prognosis include disorganization of the retinal layer, disruption of both the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone, and vitreomacular interface abnormalities. Studies involving pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel show anatomic improvement but may not always be associated with significant change in visual outcomes. Early studies lacked detailed imaging of the retinal layers and PPV was likely performed as a last resort. In addition, the novel PDS is surgically implanted into the pars plana and works as a drug reservoir with controlled release of drug. However, it has been recalled in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration due to issues with dislodgement. Surgical interventions for DME include pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel and new surgical therapies for DME such as the PDS and subretinal gene therapy have the potential to reduce the risk of DME progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 6","pages":"119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9797056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01Epub Date: 2023-04-13DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01503-5
Eileen R Faulds, Kathleen M Dungan, Molly McNett
Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to identify the implementation approaches, strategies, and outcomes for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Medline and Web of Science databases were searched to report relevant literature published between September 12, 2016 and September 12, 2021. Implementation outcomes and strategies, defined by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project, were extracted.
Recent findings: Of the 324 titles reviewed, 16 articles were included in the review. While no studies were identified as implementation research, 14 of 16 identified implementation strategies that aligned with ERIC definitions. Included studies described a multi-disciplinary approach. Clinical outcomes included Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), ranging from 7.5 to 15.3%, and 33-71% reduction in frequency of point-of-care (POC) blood glucose monitoring (BGM) using hybrid protocols. This scoping review provides valuable insight into the process of CGM implementation in the ICU. Continued research should include implementation outcomes to inform widespread utilization.
综述目的:本综述的目的是确定重症监护病房(ICU)持续血糖监测(CGM)的实施方法、策略和结果。检索Medline和Web of Science数据库,报告2016年9月12日至2021年9月12日期间发表的相关文献。提取了实施变革专家建议(ERIC)项目定义的实施成果和战略。最近的发现:在324篇论文中,有16篇文章被纳入综述。虽然没有研究被确定为实施研究,但16项研究中有14项确定了与ERIC定义一致的实施策略。纳入的研究描述了一个多学科的方法。临床结果包括平均绝对相对差(MARD),范围从7.5%到15.3%,使用混合方案的即时护理(POC)血糖监测(BGM)频率减少33-71%。这一范围审查为ICU实施CGM的过程提供了有价值的见解。继续进行的研究应包括执行结果,以便为广泛利用提供信息。
{"title":"Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critical Care: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Eileen R Faulds, Kathleen M Dungan, Molly McNett","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01503-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11892-023-01503-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to identify the implementation approaches, strategies, and outcomes for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Medline and Web of Science databases were searched to report relevant literature published between September 12, 2016 and September 12, 2021. Implementation outcomes and strategies, defined by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project, were extracted.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Of the 324 titles reviewed, 16 articles were included in the review. While no studies were identified as implementation research, 14 of 16 identified implementation strategies that aligned with ERIC definitions. Included studies described a multi-disciplinary approach. Clinical outcomes included Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), ranging from 7.5 to 15.3%, and 33-71% reduction in frequency of point-of-care (POC) blood glucose monitoring (BGM) using hybrid protocols. This scoping review provides valuable insight into the process of CGM implementation in the ICU. Continued research should include implementation outcomes to inform widespread utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 6","pages":"69-87"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098233/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9433941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01504-4
Paula Andrea Taborda Restrepo, Jorge Acosta-Reyes, Andrés Estupiñan-Bohorquez, María Alejandra Barrios-Mercado, Nestor Fabián Correa Gonzalez, Alejandra Taborda Restrepo, Noël C Barengo, Rafael Gabriel
Purpose of review: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the world. The majority of diabetes deaths (> 80%) occur in low- and middle-income countries, which are predominant in Latin America. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to compare the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the pharmacological management of T2DM in Latin America (LA) with international reference guidelines.
Recent findings: Several LA countries have recently developed CPGs. However, the quality of these guidelines is unknown according to the AGREE II tool and taking as reference three CPGs of international impact: American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Diabetes Association (EASD), and Latin American Diabetes Association (ALAD). Ten CPGs were selected for analysis. The ADA scored > 80% on the AGREE II domains and was selected as the main comparator. Eighty percent of LA CPGs were developed before 2018. Only one was not recommended (all domains < 60%). The CPGs in LA have good quality but are outdated. They have significant gaps compared to the reference. There is a need for improvement, as proposing updates every three years to maintain the best available clinical evidence in all guidelines.
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Latin America.","authors":"Paula Andrea Taborda Restrepo, Jorge Acosta-Reyes, Andrés Estupiñan-Bohorquez, María Alejandra Barrios-Mercado, Nestor Fabián Correa Gonzalez, Alejandra Taborda Restrepo, Noël C Barengo, Rafael Gabriel","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01504-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01504-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the world. The majority of diabetes deaths (> 80%) occur in low- and middle-income countries, which are predominant in Latin America. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to compare the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the pharmacological management of T2DM in Latin America (LA) with international reference guidelines.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several LA countries have recently developed CPGs. However, the quality of these guidelines is unknown according to the AGREE II tool and taking as reference three CPGs of international impact: American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Diabetes Association (EASD), and Latin American Diabetes Association (ALAD). Ten CPGs were selected for analysis. The ADA scored > 80% on the AGREE II domains and was selected as the main comparator. Eighty percent of LA CPGs were developed before 2018. Only one was not recommended (all domains < 60%). The CPGs in LA have good quality but are outdated. They have significant gaps compared to the reference. There is a need for improvement, as proposing updates every three years to maintain the best available clinical evidence in all guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 6","pages":"89-101"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160131/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01501-7
Isabella Marranzini Rodriquez, Katie L O'Sullivan
Purpose of review: With the rise in prevalence of youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2DM), it is imperative to understand the clinical burden of the disease and the socioeconomic burden this disease imposes. We review the most recent data on youth-onset T2DM, including its pathophysiology, complications, and treatment. We also review existing data to determine the socioeconomic burden of youth-onset T2DM.
Recent findings: The incidence of youth-onset T2DM is rising, and significantly accelerated following the COVID-19 pandemic. Youth with T2DM are more frequently from families of racial/ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic status. Youth-onset T2DM has more rapid disease progression compared to adult-onset type 2 diabetes. It results in earlier and more severe microvascular and macrovascular complications compared to both adult-onset T2DM and youth-onset type 1 diabetes (T1DM). While there is a lack of data describing the socioeconomic cost of youth-onset T2DM, based on extrapolation from analyses of the burden of T2DM in adults and T1DM in youth, we propose that youth-onset T2DM has higher direct and indirect costs than adult-onset T2DM. Youth-onset T2DM presents a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden due to its aggressive presentation and earlier appearance of complications. Additional research is needed regarding the cost of illness in this population.
{"title":"Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Burden of Complications and Socioeconomic Cost.","authors":"Isabella Marranzini Rodriquez, Katie L O'Sullivan","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01501-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01501-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>With the rise in prevalence of youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2DM), it is imperative to understand the clinical burden of the disease and the socioeconomic burden this disease imposes. We review the most recent data on youth-onset T2DM, including its pathophysiology, complications, and treatment. We also review existing data to determine the socioeconomic burden of youth-onset T2DM.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The incidence of youth-onset T2DM is rising, and significantly accelerated following the COVID-19 pandemic. Youth with T2DM are more frequently from families of racial/ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic status. Youth-onset T2DM has more rapid disease progression compared to adult-onset type 2 diabetes. It results in earlier and more severe microvascular and macrovascular complications compared to both adult-onset T2DM and youth-onset type 1 diabetes (T1DM). While there is a lack of data describing the socioeconomic cost of youth-onset T2DM, based on extrapolation from analyses of the burden of T2DM in adults and T1DM in youth, we propose that youth-onset T2DM has higher direct and indirect costs than adult-onset T2DM. Youth-onset T2DM presents a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden due to its aggressive presentation and earlier appearance of complications. Additional research is needed regarding the cost of illness in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 5","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9483090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01499-y
Jenine Y Stone, Lindsay S Mayberry, Kate Clouse, Shelagh Mulvaney
Purpose of review: Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires consistent self-management for optimal health outcomes. People with diabetes are prone to burnout, cognitive burden, and sub-optimal performance of self-management tasks. Interventions that focus on habit formation have the potential to increase engagement by facilitating automaticity of self-management task performance. The purpose of this review is to (1) clarify the conceptualizations of habit formation and behavioral automaticity in the context of health behavior interventions, (2) review the evidence of habit in relation to behaviors relevant to diabetes self-management, and (3) discuss opportunities for incorporating habit formation and automaticity into diabetes self-management interventions.
Recent findings: Modern habit research describes a habit as a behavior that results over time from an automatic mental process. Automatic behaviors are experienced as cue-dependent, goal-independent, unconscious, and efficient. Habit formation requires context-dependent repetition to form cue-behavior associations. Results of diabetes habit studies are mixed. Observational studies have shown positive associations between habit strength and target self-management behaviors such as taking medication and monitoring blood glucose, as well as glycemic outcomes such as HbA1c. However, intervention studies conducted in similar populations have not demonstrated a significant benefit of habit-forming interventions compared to controls, possibly due to varying techniques used to promote habit formation. Automaticity of self-management behaviors has the potential to minimize the burden associated with performance of self-management tasks and ultimately improve outcomes for people with diabetes. Future studies should focus on refining interventions focused on context-dependent repetition to promote habit formation and better measurement of habit automaticity in diabetes self-management.
{"title":"The Role of Habit Formation and Automaticity in Diabetes Self-Management: Current Evidence and Future Applications.","authors":"Jenine Y Stone, Lindsay S Mayberry, Kate Clouse, Shelagh Mulvaney","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01499-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01499-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires consistent self-management for optimal health outcomes. People with diabetes are prone to burnout, cognitive burden, and sub-optimal performance of self-management tasks. Interventions that focus on habit formation have the potential to increase engagement by facilitating automaticity of self-management task performance. The purpose of this review is to (1) clarify the conceptualizations of habit formation and behavioral automaticity in the context of health behavior interventions, (2) review the evidence of habit in relation to behaviors relevant to diabetes self-management, and (3) discuss opportunities for incorporating habit formation and automaticity into diabetes self-management interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Modern habit research describes a habit as a behavior that results over time from an automatic mental process. Automatic behaviors are experienced as cue-dependent, goal-independent, unconscious, and efficient. Habit formation requires context-dependent repetition to form cue-behavior associations. Results of diabetes habit studies are mixed. Observational studies have shown positive associations between habit strength and target self-management behaviors such as taking medication and monitoring blood glucose, as well as glycemic outcomes such as HbA1c. However, intervention studies conducted in similar populations have not demonstrated a significant benefit of habit-forming interventions compared to controls, possibly due to varying techniques used to promote habit formation. Automaticity of self-management behaviors has the potential to minimize the burden associated with performance of self-management tasks and ultimately improve outcomes for people with diabetes. Future studies should focus on refining interventions focused on context-dependent repetition to promote habit formation and better measurement of habit automaticity in diabetes self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 4","pages":"43-58"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9426766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z
Sabrena F Noria, Rita D Shelby, Katelyn D Atkins, Ninh T Nguyen, Kishore M Gadde
Purpose of review: Although bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment of severe obesity, a proportion of patients experience clinically significant weight regain (WR) with further out from surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the prevalence, predictors, and causes of weight regain.
Recent findings: Estimating the prevalence of WR is limited by a lack of consensus on its definition. While anatomic failures such as dilated gastric fundus after sleeve gastrectomy and gastro-gastric fistula after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can lead to WR, the most common causes appear to be dysregulated/maladaptive eating behaviors, lifestyle factors, and physiological compensatory mechanisms. To date, dietary, supportive, behavioral, and exercise interventions have not demonstrated a clinically meaningful impact on WR, and there is limited evidence for pharmacotherapy. Future studies should be aimed at better defining WR to begin to understand the etiologies. Additionally, there is a need for non-surgical interventions with demonstrated efficacy in rigorous randomized controlled trials for the prevention and reversal of WR after bariatric surgery.
{"title":"Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery: Scope of the Problem, Causes, Prevention, and Treatment.","authors":"Sabrena F Noria, Rita D Shelby, Katelyn D Atkins, Ninh T Nguyen, Kishore M Gadde","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment of severe obesity, a proportion of patients experience clinically significant weight regain (WR) with further out from surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the prevalence, predictors, and causes of weight regain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Estimating the prevalence of WR is limited by a lack of consensus on its definition. While anatomic failures such as dilated gastric fundus after sleeve gastrectomy and gastro-gastric fistula after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can lead to WR, the most common causes appear to be dysregulated/maladaptive eating behaviors, lifestyle factors, and physiological compensatory mechanisms. To date, dietary, supportive, behavioral, and exercise interventions have not demonstrated a clinically meaningful impact on WR, and there is limited evidence for pharmacotherapy. Future studies should be aimed at better defining WR to begin to understand the etiologies. Additionally, there is a need for non-surgical interventions with demonstrated efficacy in rigorous randomized controlled trials for the prevention and reversal of WR after bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 3","pages":"31-42"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9906605/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9985088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}