Background and Purpose: Many people with atopic dermatitis seek treatment with Chinese herbal medicine (CHM). However, the evidence that informed clinical guideline recommendations is outdated. This research updates the evidence on the efficacy and safety of CHM for atopic dermatitis and supports clinical decision-making.
Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. RCTs that compared CHM with a placebo, waitlist control or conventional medicine were eligible if they reported patient-reported outcomes, clinician-reported symptoms, long-term control, health-related quality of life or safety. Characteristics and results were extracted, risk of bias assessed and the certainty of evidence determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible.
Results: Seven RCTs (862 participants) were included. Topical CHM was not statistically different to placebo in reducing visual analogue scale itch score (MD −2.15 [−5.64, 1.34], I2 = 95%; evidence not graded) but was more effective than placebo in reducing Eczema Area and Severity Index scores (MD −2.75 [−4.07, −1.44], I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). CHM was not statistically different to placebo in improving health-related quality of life (MD −2.20 [−5.27, 0.88], I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). More adverse events were reported in the CHM groups than in the comparator groups.
Conclusion: There is limited evidence to support a change in clinical practice using CHM for atopic dermatitis. Future research should focus on patient-reported symptoms and clinician-reported signs and should carefully assess adverse events.