Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001109
Rene Cortese
Purpose of review: Sleep disorders encompass a wide range of conditions with substantial individual variability. Epigenetics, the study of heritable changes beyond DNA sequence, offers a promising avenue for personalized medicine in this field.
Recent findings: There is great potential of epigenetic markers for sleep disorder diagnosis and the development of epigenetic drugs for targeted treatment. Epigenetic age acceleration, a marker of biological aging, is linked to sleep disorders and comorbidities. Very importantly, this acceleration may be reversible with effective treatment.
Summary: While the underlying mechanisms and assessment of clinical utility require further investigation, the potential of epigenetics in sleep medicine is recognized. Future research focused on closing knowledge gaps and clinical validation is crucial to translate these findings into practical applications, paving the way for more effective and personalized management of sleep disorders.
审查目的:睡眠障碍包括多种病症,个体差异很大。表观遗传学是对 DNA 序列以外的遗传变化的研究,它为这一领域的个性化医疗提供了一个前景广阔的途径:表观遗传标记在睡眠障碍诊断和开发表观遗传药物进行针对性治疗方面具有巨大潜力。表观遗传年龄加速是生物衰老的标志,与睡眠障碍和合并症有关。总结:虽然表观遗传学的基本机制和临床实用性评估还需要进一步研究,但其在睡眠医学中的潜力已得到认可。未来的研究重点是缩小知识差距和临床验证,这对将这些发现转化为实际应用至关重要,从而为更有效和个性化的睡眠障碍管理铺平道路。
{"title":"Epigenetics and aging: relevance for sleep medicine.","authors":"Rene Cortese","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Sleep disorders encompass a wide range of conditions with substantial individual variability. Epigenetics, the study of heritable changes beyond DNA sequence, offers a promising avenue for personalized medicine in this field.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is great potential of epigenetic markers for sleep disorder diagnosis and the development of epigenetic drugs for targeted treatment. Epigenetic age acceleration, a marker of biological aging, is linked to sleep disorders and comorbidities. Very importantly, this acceleration may be reversible with effective treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While the underlying mechanisms and assessment of clinical utility require further investigation, the potential of epigenetics in sleep medicine is recognized. Future research focused on closing knowledge gaps and clinical validation is crucial to translate these findings into practical applications, paving the way for more effective and personalized management of sleep disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001110
Siddhartha G Kapnadak, Kathleen J Ramos
Purpose of review: In 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a breakthrough therapeutic for cystic fibrosis, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), because of its profound effect on lung function in large phase III clinical trials. ETI acts directly on the dysfunctional protein that causes the systemic manifestations of cystic fibrosis and also leads to improvement in nonpulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Transplant recipients were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials of ETI but may stand to benefit from correction of the underlying protein defect. Drug interactions between the three drugs in ETI and immunosuppression medications are one of the primary concerns about using ETI after transplant. No rigorous studies exist to assess the safety of ETI in transplant recipients.
Recent findings: Multiple recent publications describe the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation, including lung and nonlung transplants, and the real-world evidence for drug interactions between ETI and immunosuppression medications. In nonlung transplant recipients, the pulmonary benefits of ETI have been confirmed, but adverse events occur and may have implications for their transplanted organ (e.g. liver biopsy in the setting of elevated transaminases). Lung transplant recipients may have higher rates of ETI discontinuation than nontransplant recipients given a lack of direct pulmonary benefit and frequency of side effects. Drug interactions have not been difficult to manage, with most studies reporting variable rates of mild to moderate increased tacrolimus levels after initiation of ETI.
Summary: Limited data exist to support the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation and further research is warranted. Given the unknown risks and benefits, case by case consideration of ETI use is indicated when extra-pulmonary manifestations are present in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis. Given the proven benefit in cystic fibrosis lung disease, benefits likely outweigh the risks of ETI for nonlung solid organ transplant recipients.
审查目的:2019年,美国食品和药物管理局批准了一种治疗囊性纤维化的突破性疗法--elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor(ETI),因为它在大型III期临床试验中对肺功能产生了深远影响。ETI 直接作用于导致囊性纤维化全身表现的功能障碍蛋白,还能改善囊性纤维化的非肺部症状。移植受者被排除在 ETI 的关键临床试验之外,但他们可能会从纠正潜在的蛋白质缺陷中获益。ETI 中的三种药物与免疫抑制药物之间的药物相互作用是移植后使用 ETI 的主要顾虑之一。目前还没有严格的研究来评估 ETI 在移植受者中的安全性:最近的多篇论文介绍了实体器官移植(包括肺移植和非肺移植)后使用 ETI 的情况,以及 ETI 与免疫抑制药物之间药物相互作用的实际证据。在非肺移植受者中,ETI 的肺部益处已得到证实,但不良事件时有发生,并可能对其移植器官产生影响(如转氨酶升高时的肝活检)。肺移植受者由于缺乏直接的肺部益处且副作用频发,因此停用 ETI 的比例可能高于非移植受者。药物相互作用并不难处理,大多数研究报告称,开始使用 ETI 后,他克莫司水平轻度至中度升高的比例不一。小结:支持在实体器官移植后使用 ETI 的数据有限,需要进一步研究。鉴于风险和益处不明,当囊性纤维化肺移植受者出现肺外表现时,应根据具体情况考虑使用 ETI。鉴于对囊性纤维化肺病的益处已得到证实,对非肺部实体器官移植受者来说,使用 ETI 的益处可能大于风险。
{"title":"Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor use after solid organ transplant.","authors":"Siddhartha G Kapnadak, Kathleen J Ramos","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a breakthrough therapeutic for cystic fibrosis, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), because of its profound effect on lung function in large phase III clinical trials. ETI acts directly on the dysfunctional protein that causes the systemic manifestations of cystic fibrosis and also leads to improvement in nonpulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Transplant recipients were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials of ETI but may stand to benefit from correction of the underlying protein defect. Drug interactions between the three drugs in ETI and immunosuppression medications are one of the primary concerns about using ETI after transplant. No rigorous studies exist to assess the safety of ETI in transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Multiple recent publications describe the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation, including lung and nonlung transplants, and the real-world evidence for drug interactions between ETI and immunosuppression medications. In nonlung transplant recipients, the pulmonary benefits of ETI have been confirmed, but adverse events occur and may have implications for their transplanted organ (e.g. liver biopsy in the setting of elevated transaminases). Lung transplant recipients may have higher rates of ETI discontinuation than nontransplant recipients given a lack of direct pulmonary benefit and frequency of side effects. Drug interactions have not been difficult to manage, with most studies reporting variable rates of mild to moderate increased tacrolimus levels after initiation of ETI.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Limited data exist to support the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation and further research is warranted. Given the unknown risks and benefits, case by case consideration of ETI use is indicated when extra-pulmonary manifestations are present in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis. Given the proven benefit in cystic fibrosis lung disease, benefits likely outweigh the risks of ETI for nonlung solid organ transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001108
Nicholas Avdimiretz, Kieran Halloran, Christian Benden
Purpose of review: Lung transplantation (LTX) has transformed care for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) suffering from advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease (ACFLD), and it has evolved into an accepted therapy for patients with ACFLD across all ages. We review cystic fibrosis as a major indication for LTX, particularly highlighting outcomes including survival, a changing landscape over time, and factors affecting sequelae following LTX in cystic fibrosis.
Recent findings: Although some populations such as those undergoing lung retransplantation exhibit inferior posttransplant outcomes, LTX for pwCF provides an excellent long-term survival that has significantly improved over time, likely due to specialized cystic fibrosis center care and recognition of common comorbidities in pwCF post-LTX. There are gaps in post-LTX outcomes for pwCF, including that identified between Canada and the United States, and that seen in adolescents - both of which are likely multifactorial. In particular, the revolution in cystic fibrosis medical therapy with CFTR modulator therapy has resulted in a dramatic decline in programs performing LTX for cystic fibrosis. How durable this effect will remains to be seen.
Summary: Overall, LTX remains a well accepted ultimate therapy option in patients with ACFLD if compatible with the individual's goals of care, offering an improved quality of life and maximization of overall survival.
{"title":"Outcomes of lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis.","authors":"Nicholas Avdimiretz, Kieran Halloran, Christian Benden","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Lung transplantation (LTX) has transformed care for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) suffering from advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease (ACFLD), and it has evolved into an accepted therapy for patients with ACFLD across all ages. We review cystic fibrosis as a major indication for LTX, particularly highlighting outcomes including survival, a changing landscape over time, and factors affecting sequelae following LTX in cystic fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although some populations such as those undergoing lung retransplantation exhibit inferior posttransplant outcomes, LTX for pwCF provides an excellent long-term survival that has significantly improved over time, likely due to specialized cystic fibrosis center care and recognition of common comorbidities in pwCF post-LTX. There are gaps in post-LTX outcomes for pwCF, including that identified between Canada and the United States, and that seen in adolescents - both of which are likely multifactorial. In particular, the revolution in cystic fibrosis medical therapy with CFTR modulator therapy has resulted in a dramatic decline in programs performing LTX for cystic fibrosis. How durable this effect will remains to be seen.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Overall, LTX remains a well accepted ultimate therapy option in patients with ACFLD if compatible with the individual's goals of care, offering an improved quality of life and maximization of overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-02-26DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001063
Pedro Guimarães Rocha Lima, Matthieu Glorion, Moishe Liberman
Purpose of review: We aim to highlight two recent clinical trials that have altered the approach of the management of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Recent findings: The JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503 trials demonstrated that sublobar resection is noninferior to lobectomy for overall and disease-free survival in patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Summary: Since 1962, lobectomy has been deemed the gold standard treatment for operable lung cancer. However, two recent clinical trials have demonstrated that, for select patients, sublobar resection is oncologically noninferior; results, which are leading us into a new era for the surgical management of lung cancer. Notwithstanding the progress made by these studies and the opportunities that have been put forth, questions remain. This review aims at reviewing the results of both trials and to discuss future perspectives for the surgical treatment of lung cancer.
{"title":"Lobar or sublobar resection of peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Pedro Guimarães Rocha Lima, Matthieu Glorion, Moishe Liberman","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001063","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We aim to highlight two recent clinical trials that have altered the approach of the management of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503 trials demonstrated that sublobar resection is noninferior to lobectomy for overall and disease-free survival in patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Since 1962, lobectomy has been deemed the gold standard treatment for operable lung cancer. However, two recent clinical trials have demonstrated that, for select patients, sublobar resection is oncologically noninferior; results, which are leading us into a new era for the surgical management of lung cancer. Notwithstanding the progress made by these studies and the opportunities that have been put forth, questions remain. This review aims at reviewing the results of both trials and to discuss future perspectives for the surgical treatment of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139971344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-28DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001076
Bronwyn J Levvey, Gregory I Snell
Purpose of review: Lung transplantation activity continues to be limited by the availability of timely quality donor lungs. It is apparent though that progress has been made. The steady evolution of clinical practice, combined with painstaking scientific discovery and innovation are described.
Recent findings: There have been successful studies reporting innovations in the wider use and broader consideration of donation after circulatory death donor lungs, including an increasing number of transplants from each of the controlled, uncontrolled and medically assisted dying donor descriptive categories. Donors beyond age 70 years are providing better than expected long-term outcomes. Hepatitis C PCR positive donor lungs can be safely used if treated postoperatively with appropriate antivirals. Donor lung perfusion at a constant 10 degrees appears capable of significantly improving donor logistics and ex-vivo lung perfusion offers the potential of an ever-increasing number of novel donor management roles. Bioartificial and xenografts remain distant possibilities only at present.
Summary: Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust and combined with clinical, scientific and engineering innovations, the realizable lung donor pool is proving to be larger than previously thought.
{"title":"How do we expand the lung donor pool?","authors":"Bronwyn J Levvey, Gregory I Snell","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Lung transplantation activity continues to be limited by the availability of timely quality donor lungs. It is apparent though that progress has been made. The steady evolution of clinical practice, combined with painstaking scientific discovery and innovation are described.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There have been successful studies reporting innovations in the wider use and broader consideration of donation after circulatory death donor lungs, including an increasing number of transplants from each of the controlled, uncontrolled and medically assisted dying donor descriptive categories. Donors beyond age 70 years are providing better than expected long-term outcomes. Hepatitis C PCR positive donor lungs can be safely used if treated postoperatively with appropriate antivirals. Donor lung perfusion at a constant 10 degrees appears capable of significantly improving donor logistics and ex-vivo lung perfusion offers the potential of an ever-increasing number of novel donor management roles. Bioartificial and xenografts remain distant possibilities only at present.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust and combined with clinical, scientific and engineering innovations, the realizable lung donor pool is proving to be larger than previously thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140305161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Palliative care (PC) in lung transplantation is increasingly acknowledged for its important role in addressing symptoms, enhancing functionality, and facilitating advance care planning for patients, families, and caregivers. The present review provides an update in PC management in lung transplantation.
Recent findings: Research confirms the effectiveness of PC for patients with advanced lung disease who are undergoing transplantation, showing improvements in symptoms and reduced healthcare utilization. Assessment tools and patient-reported outcome measures for PC are commonly used in lung transplant candidates, revealing discrepancies between symptom severity and objective measures such as exercise capacity. The use of opioids to manage dyspnea and cough in the pretransplant period is deemed safe and does not heighten risks posttransplantation. However, the integration of PC support in managing symptoms and chronic allograft dysfunction in the posttransplant period has not been as well described.
Summary: Palliative care support should be provided in the pretransplant and select peri-operative and posttransplant periods to help support patient quality of life, symptoms, communication and daily function.
综述目的:肺移植中的姑息治疗(PC)在缓解症状、增强功能以及促进患者、家属和护理人员制定预先护理计划方面的重要作用日益得到认可。本综述介绍了肺移植中姑息治疗管理的最新进展:最近的研究结果:研究证实了肺移植晚期患者接受 PC 治疗的有效性,表明患者的症状得到了改善,并减少了医疗费用的使用。肺移植候选者通常会使用PC评估工具和患者报告的结果测量方法,结果显示症状严重程度与运动能力等客观测量方法之间存在差异。在移植前使用阿片类药物控制呼吸困难和咳嗽被认为是安全的,不会增加移植后的风险。小结:姑息治疗支持应在移植前、选择性围手术期和移植后提供,以帮助提高患者的生活质量、症状、沟通和日常功能。
{"title":"An update of palliative care in lung transplantation with a focus on symptoms, quality of life and functional outcomes.","authors":"Dmitry Rozenberg, Rogih Riad Andrawes, Kirsten Wentlandt","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001075","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Palliative care (PC) in lung transplantation is increasingly acknowledged for its important role in addressing symptoms, enhancing functionality, and facilitating advance care planning for patients, families, and caregivers. The present review provides an update in PC management in lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research confirms the effectiveness of PC for patients with advanced lung disease who are undergoing transplantation, showing improvements in symptoms and reduced healthcare utilization. Assessment tools and patient-reported outcome measures for PC are commonly used in lung transplant candidates, revealing discrepancies between symptom severity and objective measures such as exercise capacity. The use of opioids to manage dyspnea and cough in the pretransplant period is deemed safe and does not heighten risks posttransplantation. However, the integration of PC support in managing symptoms and chronic allograft dysfunction in the posttransplant period has not been as well described.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Palliative care support should be provided in the pretransplant and select peri-operative and posttransplant periods to help support patient quality of life, symptoms, communication and daily function.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140293123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-02-23DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001064
Lauren Kearney, Tatyana Nguyen, Katrina Steiling
Purpose of review: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Health disparities have long been noted in lung cancer incidence and survival and persist across the continuum of care. Understanding the gaps in care that arise from disparities in lung cancer risk, screening, treatment, and survivorship are essential to guiding efforts to achieve equitable care.
Recent findings: Recent literature continues to show that Black people, women, and people who experience socioeconomic disadvantage or live in rural areas experience disparities throughout the spectrum of lung cancer care. Contributing factors include structural racism, lower education level and health literacy, insurance type, healthcare facility accessibility, inhaled carcinogen exposure, and unmet social needs. Promising strategies to improve lung cancer care equity include policy to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke and harmful pollutants, more inclusive lung cancer screening eligibility criteria, improved access and patient navigation in lung cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment, more deliberate offering of appropriate surgical and medical treatments, and improved availability of survivorship and palliative care.
Summary: Given ongoing disparities in lung cancer care, research to determine best practices for narrowing these gaps and to guide policy change are an essential focus of future lung cancer research.
{"title":"Disparities across the continuum of lung cancer care: a review of recent literature.","authors":"Lauren Kearney, Tatyana Nguyen, Katrina Steiling","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001064","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Health disparities have long been noted in lung cancer incidence and survival and persist across the continuum of care. Understanding the gaps in care that arise from disparities in lung cancer risk, screening, treatment, and survivorship are essential to guiding efforts to achieve equitable care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature continues to show that Black people, women, and people who experience socioeconomic disadvantage or live in rural areas experience disparities throughout the spectrum of lung cancer care. Contributing factors include structural racism, lower education level and health literacy, insurance type, healthcare facility accessibility, inhaled carcinogen exposure, and unmet social needs. Promising strategies to improve lung cancer care equity include policy to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke and harmful pollutants, more inclusive lung cancer screening eligibility criteria, improved access and patient navigation in lung cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment, more deliberate offering of appropriate surgical and medical treatments, and improved availability of survivorship and palliative care.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Given ongoing disparities in lung cancer care, research to determine best practices for narrowing these gaps and to guide policy change are an essential focus of future lung cancer research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139971342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001081
Allan R Glanville, Carli J Lehr
{"title":"Lung transplantation: practical and important directions of care.","authors":"Allan R Glanville, Carli J Lehr","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001081","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001081","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-02-26DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001060
Jessica Lum, Christine Koval
Purpose of review: Infections in lung transplant recipients remain a major challenge and can affect lung allograft function and cause significant morbidity and mortality. New strategies for the prevention and treatment of infection in lung transplantation have emerged and are reviewed.
Recent findings: For important vaccine preventable infections (VPIs), guidance has been updated for at risk solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, data on the efficacy of newer vaccines in lung transplant, including the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, are limited. Studies demonstrate improved vaccination rate with Infectious Diseases consultation during pretransplant evaluation. Two new antiviral agents for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in SOT, letermovir and maribavir, are being incorporated into clinical care. CMV-specific cell-mediated immune function assays are more widely available. Antibiotics for the management of multidrug resistant pathogens and Burkholderia cepacia complex have been described in case series and case reports in lung transplant.
Summary: Although new vaccines and novel therapies for preventing and treating infections are available, larger studies evaluating efficacy in lung transplant recipients are needed.
综述目的:肺移植受者感染仍是一项重大挑战,可影响肺移植功能并导致严重的发病率和死亡率。本文回顾了肺移植感染预防和治疗的新策略:对于重要的疫苗可预防感染(VPIs),针对高风险实体器官移植(SOT)受者的指南已经更新。然而,有关较新疫苗(包括呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 疫苗)在肺移植中疗效的数据却很有限。研究表明,在移植前评估期间进行传染病咨询可提高疫苗接种率。两种用于治疗和预防 SOT 巨细胞病毒 (CMV) 的新型抗病毒药物--letermovir 和 maribavir 正被纳入临床治疗。CMV特异性细胞介导免疫功能测定的应用也更加广泛。在肺移植的系列病例和病例报告中介绍了用于治疗耐多药病原体和伯克霍尔德氏菌复合体的抗生素。摘要:虽然预防和治疗感染的新疫苗和新疗法已经问世,但仍需要对肺移植受者的疗效进行更大规模的研究评估。
{"title":"The changing landscape of infections in the lung transplant recipient.","authors":"Jessica Lum, Christine Koval","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001060","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Infections in lung transplant recipients remain a major challenge and can affect lung allograft function and cause significant morbidity and mortality. New strategies for the prevention and treatment of infection in lung transplantation have emerged and are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>For important vaccine preventable infections (VPIs), guidance has been updated for at risk solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, data on the efficacy of newer vaccines in lung transplant, including the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, are limited. Studies demonstrate improved vaccination rate with Infectious Diseases consultation during pretransplant evaluation. Two new antiviral agents for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in SOT, letermovir and maribavir, are being incorporated into clinical care. CMV-specific cell-mediated immune function assays are more widely available. Antibiotics for the management of multidrug resistant pathogens and Burkholderia cepacia complex have been described in case series and case reports in lung transplant.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although new vaccines and novel therapies for preventing and treating infections are available, larger studies evaluating efficacy in lung transplant recipients are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139971258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-07DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000001079
Ana Collazo-Lorduy, Mariola Blanco, Virginia Calvo, Mariano Provencio
Purpose of review: Early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 30% of the total NSCLC, being the stage III a heterogeneous disease that represents a challenge in the management of these patients. Multidisciplinary approach is essential for an adequate treatment strategy, with surgery being the only curative treatment. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for a long period, with modest results.
Recent findings: Combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the neoadjuvant setting of resectable NSCLC, improving pathologic complete responses and survival outcomes in this scenario. Furthermore, perioperative treatment with immunotherapy has also recently shown promising results in several phase III trials.
Summary: The landscape of early-stage resectable NSCLC has evolved in recent years, with an improvement in the survival of these patients since the incorporation of immunotherapy in this scenario.
{"title":"Integrated management of stage III in nonsmall cell lung cancer: where do perioperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy fit?","authors":"Ana Collazo-Lorduy, Mariola Blanco, Virginia Calvo, Mariano Provencio","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001079","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 30% of the total NSCLC, being the stage III a heterogeneous disease that represents a challenge in the management of these patients. Multidisciplinary approach is essential for an adequate treatment strategy, with surgery being the only curative treatment. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for a long period, with modest results.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the neoadjuvant setting of resectable NSCLC, improving pathologic complete responses and survival outcomes in this scenario. Furthermore, perioperative treatment with immunotherapy has also recently shown promising results in several phase III trials.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The landscape of early-stage resectable NSCLC has evolved in recent years, with an improvement in the survival of these patients since the incorporation of immunotherapy in this scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140862394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}