Diabetes & Metabolism Journal最新文献

Backgruound: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of an initial combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe compared with statin monotherapy on major cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with diabetes.

Methods: In this population-based cohort study using National Health Insurance Service data (2010-2020), we included adults with diabetes who had not previously used any lipid-lowering medications. Those initiating statin monotherapy were matched 1:1 using propensity scores with patients starting combination therapy with a lower-potency statin and ezetimibe. This matching process resulted in 21,458 individuals in the primary prevention cohort and 10,094 in the secondary prevention cohort, respectively. The primary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Hospitalizations for heart failure, angina, and all-cause mortality were analyzed. The impact of ezetimibe maintenance on the primary endpoint was analyzed, and other hospitalizations were categorized as adverse events.

Results: Compared with statin monotherapy, statin-ezetimibe combination significantly reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint (4.85 vs. 3.25 per 1,000 person-years: hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.81 in the primary cohort; and 19.5 vs. 15.7 per 1,000 person-years: HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.91 in the secondary cohort) and myocardial infarction (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.82 in the primary cohort; and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.89 in the secondary cohort). A longer maintenance period of ezetimibe was significantly related to better efficacy in the composite cardiovascular outcomes. High-intensity statin monotherapy was associated with an elevated risk of liver, muscle, and diabetes-related hospitalization in the primary prevention cohort.

Conclusion: Initial therapy with a statin-ezetimibe combination is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular events and fewer adverse events compared to statin monotherapy in individuals with diabetes, over a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (up to 9 years).

Backgruound: In this study, we aimed to determine the metabolic characteristics and changes in the early stages of young-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (YOD) in Koreans.

Methods: From the Anam Diabetes Observational Study cohort (2017-2023), the characteristics of newly diagnosed YOD (<40 years of age, n=39) and later-onset (≥40 years of age) type 2 diabetes mellitus (LOD, n=178) were compared at diagnosis and 1 year later. All participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test at diagnosis and annually thereafter. β-Cell function was determined using the disposition index (DI), calculated as the insulinogenic index×Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI). Insulin sensitivity was determined using ISI and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR).

Results: Mean (±standard deviation) age of individuals with YOD was 29.8±6.4 years, and 76.9% were male. YOD patients had higher body mass index (29.8 kg/m2 vs. 27.2 kg/m2, P=0.020), fat mass (30.5 kg vs. 24.1 kg, P=0.011), fatty liver index (65.4 vs. 49.2, P=0.005), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level at diagnosis (9.3% vs. 7.7%, P<0.001) compared with LOD patients. YOD patients exhibited lower insulin sensitivity (ISI: 2.79 vs. 3.26, P=0.008; HOMA2-IR: 2.72 vs. 1.83, P<0.001) and β-cell function (DI) at diagnosis (0.41 vs. 0.72, P=0.003) than LOD patients. Following 1 year of treatment, DI improved by 94% in YOD along with improvement in HbA1c; however, it was still significantly lower than that of LOD (0.64 vs. 0.90, P=0.017).

Conclusion: Individuals with YOD have unfavorable metabolic characteristics, substantially reduced insulin sensitivity, and decompensated β-cell function at disease onset, which persist even after treatment.

Backgruound: The autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in the brain's communication with metabolically important peripheral organs, modulating insulin sensitivity and secretion. Increased sympathetic tone is a common feature in prediabetes and diabetes. The parasympathetic nervous system activity might be improvable through resonance frequency breathing (RFB) with heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) training.

Methods: We here investigated the effect of a 4-week mobile RFB-HRV-BF intervention on glucose metabolism and HRV of 30 healthy adults (17 females; mean age 25.77±3.64 years; mean body mass index 22.65±2.95 kg/m2). Before and after the intervention, glucose metabolism was assessed by 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests (with blood sampling every 30 minutes over 2 hours) and HRV was measured through electrocardiography.

Results: RFB-HRV-BF training did not influence glucose metabolism in healthy adults but reduced fasting as well as 2-hour-postload glucose in participants categorized as more insulin resistant before the intervention. In addition, RFB-HRV-BF training was associated with an increase in the time and frequency domain HRV parameters standard deviation of all NN-intervals, root mean square successive differences, HRV high-frequency and HRV low-frequency after 4 weeks of intervention.

Conclusion: Our findings introduce RFB-HRV-BF training as an effective tool to modulate the autonomic nervous system with a shift towards the parasympathetic tone. Along with the observed decrease in glycemia in those with lower insulin sensitivity, RFB-HRV-BF training emerges as a promising non-pharmacological approach to improve glucose metabolism which has to be further investigated in prediabetes and diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus comprises a heterogeneous group of metabolic disorders differing in etiology, clinical course, and outcomes. Traditional classifications, such as type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, fail to capture the full heterogeneity, including variation in insulin deficiency, insulin resistance, and complication burden. To address these limitations, we propose the Diabetes Grade-Stage Classification, an integrated system that combines pathophysiology-based grading with complication-based staging. Grading quantifies metabolic dysfunction through the assessment of insulin deficiency and insulin resistance. In parallel, staging assesses the extent of target organ damage, particularly in the cardiovascular, renal, ocular, and nervous systems. Together, this framework enables a comprehensive assessment of disease status, identification of vulnerable or high-risk phenotypes, and implementation of risk-adapted management strategies. Clinically, it facilitates personalized care, promotes collaborative coordination, and strengthens physician-patient communication. Furthermore, this framework provides a scalable structure for integrating disease severity into both individual- and population-level interventions. Although the current criteria for grading and staging are based on expert consensus and selected clinical indicators, such as low C-peptide levels and advanced complications, further validation and refinement are needed. In conclusion, the grading and staging system provides an operational tool for classifying the severity of diabetes mellitus and has the potential to extend life expectancy and improve quality of life for people living with diabetes mellitus.

Backgruound: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires stringent glycemic control from an early stage to prevent complications. The most effective treatment regimen for early T2DM remains unclear. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of monotherapies and combination therapies for early T2DM.

Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials focused on glycemic control, body weight, and adverse events were included. The primary outcomes were changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and odds of achieving the target HbA1c after 6 months.

Results: All combination therapies were more effective than monotherapy. Metformin+glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) (weighted mean difference [WMD] -1.50%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.04 to -0.96) and metformin+dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (WMD -1.46%; 95% CI, -1.96 to -0.95) were the most effective for change in HbA1c. GLP-1RA and sodium- glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors led to weight reduction. Apart from the increased risk of hypoglycemia with sulfonylureas, no significant differences in adverse events were observed across regimens.

Conclusion: Early combination therapy effectively improved glycemic control in patients with early T2DM without significantly increasing adverse risks. Future studies should explore new combinations, including potent GLP-1RA.

Background: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone 30 mg/day add-on to inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with treatment of dapagliflozin and metformin.

Methods: In this multicenter (34 sites), double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study, patients with T2DM with an inadequately controlled glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) over 7.0% to treatment with dapagliflozin (10 mg/day) and metformin (≥1,000 mg/day) were randomized to receive additional pioglitazone 30 mg/day (n=124) or placebo (n=122) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean change of HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks treatment. The efficacy and safety were evaluated with open label extension period, switching placebo to pioglitazone 30 mg/day at 48 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05296044).

Results: The HbA1c after 24 weeks treatment reduced from 7.8%±0.8% to 7.0%±0.6% (P<0.0001). The proportions of patients who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% at 24 weeks were significantly higher in pioglitazone add-on group (51.61% in pioglitazone vs. 22.95% in placebo, P<0.0001), or less than 6.5% at 24 weeks (21.77% in pioglitazone vs. 2.46% in placebo, P<0.0001). Body weight gain was 2.0 kg at 24 weeks with pioglitazone 30 mg/day and -0.6 kg at 24 weeks with placebo.

Conclusion: Addition of pioglitazone 30 mg/day to T2DM patients who did not reach the target HbA1c (≤7%) with treatment of dapagliflozin 10 mg/day and metformin over 1,000 mg/day showed effective glucose lowering efficacy without significant hypoglycemia and good tolerability with low prevalence of edema in spite of modest weight gain.