首页 > 最新文献

Cytogenetic and Genome Research最新文献

英文 中文
Radiosensitivity and bystander response in X-ray irradiated tumour and normal epithelial cells of breast and prostate origin. x线照射肿瘤和乳腺、前列腺源性正常上皮细胞的放射敏感性和旁观者反应。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1159/000550473
Rahul Kabir, Teena Koshy, Pooja Kamal Melwani, Badri Narain Pandey, Satish Srinivas Kondaveeti, Venkatachalam Perumal

Introduction: Radiotherapy outcome is governed by radiosensitivity and DNA repair capacity of tumour cells and their interaction with surrounding normal tissues and vice versa. As radiosensitivity varies with the origin and genetic makeup of the cell, this study compares direct and bystander responses in directly targeted to X-rays and non-targeted (bystander) tumour (MCF-7 and PC3) and normal (MCF10A and HPrEC) epithelial cells of breast and prostate origin.

Methods: Cells were exposed to X-rays (0, 2, and 4 Gy) by a clinical LINAC and co-cultured with corresponding un-irradiated cells. Micronucleus (MN) and clonogenic assays were adopted to quantify the DNA damage and survival fraction (SF), respectively, in all cells and Multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization (m-FISH) in MCF-7 and PC3 cells to identify the chromosomes frequently involved in translocations.

Results: Directly targeted tumour and normal cells showed a significant increase in MN frequency and decrease in SF. MN frequency increased from 0.023 ± 0.004 (control) to 0.076 ± 0.008 (2 Gy), and 0.177 ± 0.013 (4 Gy) in MCF-7 cells. MCF10A showed MN frequency of 0.049 ± 0.007 (control), 0.128 ± 0.011 (2 Gy) and 0.219 ± 0.014 (4 Gy). SF was significantly higher in MCF-7 (0.39 ± 0.03 and 0.15 ± 0.02) cells than MCF10A (0.30 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.01). MN frequency in PC3 cells increased from 0.056 ± 0.007 (control) to 0.168 ± 0.012 (2 Gy) and 0.378 ± 0.019 (4 Gy). HPrEC exhibited MN frequency of 0.018 ± 0.004 (control), 0.058 ± 0.007 (2 Gy), and 0.147 ± 0.012 (4 Gy). SF was higher in HPrEC (0.72 ± 0.03 and 0.40 ± 0.02) cells than PC3 (0.22 ± 0.01 and 0.09 ± 0.004). Similarly, a significant increase in MN frequency was observed in the non-targeted cells when compared to that of control, confirming occurrence of radiation-induced bystander effect. Thus, the results indicate radiation sensitivity differs among the cell types. The m-FISH results reveal a non-random distribution of X-irradiation induced breaks and translocation. In directly targeted cells, chromosomes 7, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22 (MCF-7) and 3, 4, 6, 14, 17 (PC3) showed frequent involvement in translocations. Chromosomes 3, 4, 6, and 14 (MCF-7) and 10, 11, 17, and 18 (PC3) were frequently involved in non-targeted cells.

Conclusion: The present study results indicate that the tumour cells demonstrated higher radiosensitivity and a stronger bystander response than normal cells. Intrinsic molecular factors and genome organization affect both targeted and non-targeted responses, emphasizing their relevance for optimizing radiotherapy strategies.

放疗结果取决于肿瘤细胞的放射敏感性和DNA修复能力及其与周围正常组织的相互作用,反之亦然。由于放射敏感性随细胞来源和基因组成的不同而不同,本研究比较了直接靶向x射线和非靶向(旁观者)肿瘤(MCF-7和PC3)和正常(MCF10A和HPrEC)乳腺和前列腺来源的上皮细胞的直接和旁观者反应。方法:用临床LINAC将细胞暴露于x射线(0、2和4 Gy)下,并与相应的未照射细胞共培养。采用微核(MN)和克隆实验分别量化所有细胞的DNA损伤和存活分数(SF),并在MCF-7和PC3细胞中采用多色荧光原位杂交(m-FISH)鉴定易易位的染色体。结果:直接靶向肿瘤细胞和正常细胞的MN频率明显升高,SF明显降低。MCF-7细胞的MN频率分别从0.023±0.004(对照)增加到0.076±0.008 (2 Gy)和0.177±0.013 (4 Gy)。MCF10A的MN频率分别为0.049±0.007(对照)、0.128±0.011 (2 Gy)和0.219±0.014 (4 Gy)。MCF-7细胞的SF(0.39±0.03和0.15±0.02)明显高于MCF10A细胞(0.30±0.02和0.12±0.01)。PC3细胞的MN频率从0.056±0.007(对照)增加到0.168±0.012 (2 Gy)和0.378±0.019 (4 Gy)。HPrEC的MN频率分别为0.018±0.004(对照)、0.058±0.007 (2 Gy)和0.147±0.012 (4 Gy)。HPrEC细胞的SF(0.72±0.03和0.40±0.02)高于PC3细胞(0.22±0.01和0.09±0.004)。同样,与对照组相比,在非靶向细胞中观察到MN频率显著增加,证实了辐射诱导的旁观者效应的发生。因此,结果表明不同类型的细胞对辐射的敏感性不同。m-FISH结果揭示了x照射诱导的断裂和易位的非随机分布。在直接靶细胞中,染色体7、16、17、20、21、22 (MCF-7)和3、4、6、14、17 (PC3)频繁参与易位。染色体3、4、6和14 (MCF-7)和10、11、17和18 (PC3)经常参与非靶向细胞。结论:肿瘤细胞比正常细胞表现出更高的放射敏感性和更强的旁观者反应。内在分子因素和基因组组织影响靶向和非靶向反应,强调其与优化放疗策略的相关性。
{"title":"Radiosensitivity and bystander response in X-ray irradiated tumour and normal epithelial cells of breast and prostate origin.","authors":"Rahul Kabir, Teena Koshy, Pooja Kamal Melwani, Badri Narain Pandey, Satish Srinivas Kondaveeti, Venkatachalam Perumal","doi":"10.1159/000550473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiotherapy outcome is governed by radiosensitivity and DNA repair capacity of tumour cells and their interaction with surrounding normal tissues and vice versa. As radiosensitivity varies with the origin and genetic makeup of the cell, this study compares direct and bystander responses in directly targeted to X-rays and non-targeted (bystander) tumour (MCF-7 and PC3) and normal (MCF10A and HPrEC) epithelial cells of breast and prostate origin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cells were exposed to X-rays (0, 2, and 4 Gy) by a clinical LINAC and co-cultured with corresponding un-irradiated cells. Micronucleus (MN) and clonogenic assays were adopted to quantify the DNA damage and survival fraction (SF), respectively, in all cells and Multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization (m-FISH) in MCF-7 and PC3 cells to identify the chromosomes frequently involved in translocations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Directly targeted tumour and normal cells showed a significant increase in MN frequency and decrease in SF. MN frequency increased from 0.023 ± 0.004 (control) to 0.076 ± 0.008 (2 Gy), and 0.177 ± 0.013 (4 Gy) in MCF-7 cells. MCF10A showed MN frequency of 0.049 ± 0.007 (control), 0.128 ± 0.011 (2 Gy) and 0.219 ± 0.014 (4 Gy). SF was significantly higher in MCF-7 (0.39 ± 0.03 and 0.15 ± 0.02) cells than MCF10A (0.30 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.01). MN frequency in PC3 cells increased from 0.056 ± 0.007 (control) to 0.168 ± 0.012 (2 Gy) and 0.378 ± 0.019 (4 Gy). HPrEC exhibited MN frequency of 0.018 ± 0.004 (control), 0.058 ± 0.007 (2 Gy), and 0.147 ± 0.012 (4 Gy). SF was higher in HPrEC (0.72 ± 0.03 and 0.40 ± 0.02) cells than PC3 (0.22 ± 0.01 and 0.09 ± 0.004). Similarly, a significant increase in MN frequency was observed in the non-targeted cells when compared to that of control, confirming occurrence of radiation-induced bystander effect. Thus, the results indicate radiation sensitivity differs among the cell types. The m-FISH results reveal a non-random distribution of X-irradiation induced breaks and translocation. In directly targeted cells, chromosomes 7, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22 (MCF-7) and 3, 4, 6, 14, 17 (PC3) showed frequent involvement in translocations. Chromosomes 3, 4, 6, and 14 (MCF-7) and 10, 11, 17, and 18 (PC3) were frequently involved in non-targeted cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study results indicate that the tumour cells demonstrated higher radiosensitivity and a stronger bystander response than normal cells. Intrinsic molecular factors and genome organization affect both targeted and non-targeted responses, emphasizing their relevance for optimizing radiotherapy strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytogenetic Profile Of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in South India: A Series Of 1819 Patients From A Single Centre. 印度南部急性淋巴细胞白血病的细胞遗传学特征:来自单一中心的1819名患者的一系列研究。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1159/000550620
Vivi M Srivastava, Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian, Sukesh Nair, Marie Therese Manipadam, Kavitha M Lakshmi, Uday P Kulkarni, Anup J Devasia, Fouzia N Aboobacker, Anu Korula, Aby Abraham, Alok Srivastava

Introduction: Cytogenetic findings are critical for determining prognosis, therapy and risk assessment in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Data on the epidemiology of cytogenetic findings in ALL from southern Asia is limited. This report documents the cytogenetic changes in ALL seen at a referral hospital in southern India and compares it with the literature.

Methods: Clinical profiling and conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) of all patients with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of cryptic t(12;21).

Results: Of 1968 ALL, 1,819 (92.4%) patients, age 0.3-84 years, (median 17) had successful CCA. There were 979 children (<18 years) and 840 adults. Abnormal karyotypes were found in 1368 (75.2%), B-ALL-78% and T-ALL-69%. Favorable-risk group included high hyperdiploidy (HeH, 17.4%), t(12;21) (9.8%), and t(1;19) (4.3%), with > 80% of HeH and t(12;21) in children. The unfavorable-risk group included t(9;22) (11.2%, 80% adults), hypodiploidy (8.0%), MYC (8q24) translocations (2.3%), and KMT2A/MLL(11q23) translocations (1.6%). In children, the frequency of HeH (26.8%) was lower than the West (30.7%) but higher than S.E. Asia (15.5%) while t(9;22) (4.2%) was higher than the West (2%) but lower than S.E. Asia (6.8%). In adults, frequencies again differed from S.E. Asia (HeH, 6.4% vs. 2.7% and t(9;22), 19.4% vs. 29.3%) but were comparable to the West.

Conclusion: CCA effectively provides diagnostic information in over 90% of ALL cases. While the spectrum of cytogenetic changes is similar to global data, there are significant regional variations in the frequencies of specific abnormalities.

细胞遗传学结果对急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的预后、治疗和风险评估至关重要。南亚急性淋巴细胞白血病的细胞遗传学流行病学研究数据有限。本报告记录了在印度南部一家转诊医院看到的ALL细胞遗传学变化,并将其与文献进行了比较。方法:采用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)对所有患者进行临床分析和常规细胞遗传学分析(CCA)检测隐型t(12;21)。结果:1968年ALL中,1819例(92.4%)患者(年龄0.3-84岁)行CCA成功。979例患儿中HeH和t占80%(12例;21例)。不良风险组包括t(9;22)(11.2%, 80%成人)、次二倍体(8.0%)、MYC (8q24)易位(2.3%)和KMT2A/MLL(11q23)易位(1.6%)。儿童中HeH发生率(26.8%)低于西方(30.7%),高于东南亚(15.5%);t(9.22)(4.2%)高于西方(2%),低于东南亚(6.8%)。在成人中,频率再次与东南亚不同(HeH, 6.4%对2.7%,t(9;22), 19.4%对29.3%),但与西方相当。结论:CCA在90%以上的ALL病例中能有效提供诊断信息。虽然细胞遗传学变化的频谱与全球数据相似,但在特定异常的频率上存在显著的区域差异。
{"title":"Cytogenetic Profile Of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in South India: A Series Of 1819 Patients From A Single Centre.","authors":"Vivi M Srivastava, Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian, Sukesh Nair, Marie Therese Manipadam, Kavitha M Lakshmi, Uday P Kulkarni, Anup J Devasia, Fouzia N Aboobacker, Anu Korula, Aby Abraham, Alok Srivastava","doi":"10.1159/000550620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cytogenetic findings are critical for determining prognosis, therapy and risk assessment in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Data on the epidemiology of cytogenetic findings in ALL from southern Asia is limited. This report documents the cytogenetic changes in ALL seen at a referral hospital in southern India and compares it with the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical profiling and conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) of all patients with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of cryptic t(12;21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1968 ALL, 1,819 (92.4%) patients, age 0.3-84 years, (median 17) had successful CCA. There were 979 children (<18 years) and 840 adults. Abnormal karyotypes were found in 1368 (75.2%), B-ALL-78% and T-ALL-69%. Favorable-risk group included high hyperdiploidy (HeH, 17.4%), t(12;21) (9.8%), and t(1;19) (4.3%), with > 80% of HeH and t(12;21) in children. The unfavorable-risk group included t(9;22) (11.2%, 80% adults), hypodiploidy (8.0%), MYC (8q24) translocations (2.3%), and KMT2A/MLL(11q23) translocations (1.6%). In children, the frequency of HeH (26.8%) was lower than the West (30.7%) but higher than S.E. Asia (15.5%) while t(9;22) (4.2%) was higher than the West (2%) but lower than S.E. Asia (6.8%). In adults, frequencies again differed from S.E. Asia (HeH, 6.4% vs. 2.7% and t(9;22), 19.4% vs. 29.3%) but were comparable to the West.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCA effectively provides diagnostic information in over 90% of ALL cases. While the spectrum of cytogenetic changes is similar to global data, there are significant regional variations in the frequencies of specific abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chromosome structure of wild wheat relative Aegilops uniaristata (Triticeae). 野生小麦亲缘小麦的染色体结构。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1159/000550462
Tatiana V Danilova, Bernd Friebe, Eduard Akhunov

Introduction: Homoeologous chromosomes within the grass tribe Triticeae have largely retained their cross-species colinearity. However, prior studies suggest that the karyotype of Aegilops uniaristata, a diploid wild relative of wheat (genome NN, 2n=2x=14), is noticeably different from most of the Triticeae species.

Methods: We used fluorescence in situ hybridization with a large collection of probes hybridizing to repetitive and coding regions of the Triticeae genomes to perform comparative cytogenetic analysis and establish the macrostructure of Ae. uniaristata chromosomes.

Results: Compared to wheat, all chromosomes of Ae. uniaristata, with the exception of 5N, were found significantly rearranged due to multiple inter- and intrachromosomal translocations and inversions. Discussion/ Conclusion: The N genome structure revealed in our study is useful for understanding karyotype evolution and facilitating introgression from Ae. uniaristata and the N genome of polyploid Aegilops species for wheat improvement.

禾本科部落小麦科的同源染色体在很大程度上保留了它们的跨种共线性。然而,先前的研究表明,小麦的二倍体野生近缘种Aegilops unaristata(基因组NN, 2n=2x=14)的核型与大多数小麦品种存在显著差异。方法:采用荧光原位杂交技术,将大量探针杂交到麦类小麦基因组的重复区和编码区,进行细胞遗传学比较分析,建立麦类小麦的宏观结构。uniaristata染色体。结果:与小麦相比,白纹伊蚊的所有染色体均呈阳性。除5N外,unaristata由于染色体间和染色体内的多次易位和倒位而被发现明显重排。讨论/结论:本研究揭示的N基因组结构有助于了解Ae的核型进化和促进其基因渐近。小麦多倍体羊蹄草的N基因组改良。
{"title":"Chromosome structure of wild wheat relative Aegilops uniaristata (Triticeae).","authors":"Tatiana V Danilova, Bernd Friebe, Eduard Akhunov","doi":"10.1159/000550462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550462","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Homoeologous chromosomes within the grass tribe Triticeae have largely retained their cross-species colinearity. However, prior studies suggest that the karyotype of Aegilops uniaristata, a diploid wild relative of wheat (genome NN, 2n=2x=14), is noticeably different from most of the Triticeae species.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used fluorescence in situ hybridization with a large collection of probes hybridizing to repetitive and coding regions of the Triticeae genomes to perform comparative cytogenetic analysis and establish the macrostructure of Ae. uniaristata chromosomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to wheat, all chromosomes of Ae. uniaristata, with the exception of 5N, were found significantly rearranged due to multiple inter- and intrachromosomal translocations and inversions. Discussion/ Conclusion: The N genome structure revealed in our study is useful for understanding karyotype evolution and facilitating introgression from Ae. uniaristata and the N genome of polyploid Aegilops species for wheat improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genomic Imprinting: Insights into Diverse Epigenetic Regulatory Mechanisms. 基因组印记:洞察不同的表观遗传调控机制。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1159/000547555
Gaurav Kumar Pandey, Rajiva Raman

Background: Genomic imprinting is a well-known phenomenon in which certain genes are expressed in a sex-of-the-parent-specific manner, resulting in mono-allelic expression.

Summary: Over the years, the diversity of mechanisms observed in imprinted gene clusters has provided a valuable model system for exploring the complexities of epigenetics, which can be extended to other cellular and disease models. This review examines these different mechanisms throughout early embryonic development and offers insights into the interactions among key players such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, as well as their regulatory impact on gene expression.

Key message: Genomic imprinting, although being a classical genetic concept, has emerged as a model system for understanding diverse epigenetic regulatory mechanisms. This review offers an overview of such regulatory mechanisms that have been learnt over the years through studies on imprinted clusters.

基因组印记是一种众所周知的现象,其中某些基因以父母性别特异性的方式表达,导致单等位基因表达。多年来,在印迹基因簇中观察到的机制多样性为探索表观遗传学的复杂性提供了一个有价值的模型系统,可以扩展到其他细胞和疾病模型。这篇综述探讨了这些不同的机制在整个早期胚胎发育过程中,并提供了关键参与者之间的相互作用的见解,如DNA甲基化,组蛋白修饰和非编码rna,以及它们对基因表达的调控影响。
{"title":"Genomic Imprinting: Insights into Diverse Epigenetic Regulatory Mechanisms.","authors":"Gaurav Kumar Pandey, Rajiva Raman","doi":"10.1159/000547555","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomic imprinting is a well-known phenomenon in which certain genes are expressed in a sex-of-the-parent-specific manner, resulting in mono-allelic expression.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Over the years, the diversity of mechanisms observed in imprinted gene clusters has provided a valuable model system for exploring the complexities of epigenetics, which can be extended to other cellular and disease models. This review examines these different mechanisms throughout early embryonic development and offers insights into the interactions among key players such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, as well as their regulatory impact on gene expression.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>Genomic imprinting, although being a classical genetic concept, has emerged as a model system for understanding diverse epigenetic regulatory mechanisms. This review offers an overview of such regulatory mechanisms that have been learnt over the years through studies on imprinted clusters.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"46-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144689425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Karyoevolutionary Processes in Atlantic Damselfishes of the Genus Stegastes (Pomacentridae). 大西洋豆娘鱼(豆娘科)的核进化过程。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.1159/000548331
Marsílio S P Rocha, Gideão W W F Costa, Marcelo B Cioffi, Luiz A C Bertollo, Vanessa C S Oliveira, Karlla D J Amorim, Wagner F Molina

Background: The damselfishes, an extremely diverse group of herbivorous fish, stands out as an important and ubiquitous ecological component of coral reefs. In the Western South Atlantic, the genus Stegastes is the most representative, whose evolutionary paths and taxonomic status of insular endemic species have been better evaluated. To clarify the karyotypic evolution involved in the diversification of this group, cytogenetic analyses were performed in four nominal species (Stegastes variabilis and Stegastes fuscus, distributed in Brazilian coastal regions; Stegastes rocasensis and Stegastes sanctipauli, from Rocas Atoll and São Paulo and São Pedro Archipelago) and one subspecies (S. fuscus trindadensis, from Trindade and Martim Vaz Archipelago).

Results: Classical cytogenetic protocols and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S and 5S rDNA probes were used for comparative analyses. All species had 2n = 48 chromosomes, with high FN values ranging from 88 to 92. Stegastes rocasensis and S. sanctipauli shared identical cytogenetic patterns, while S. f. trindadensis revealed a syntenic arrangement of 18S and 5S rDNA sites not found in S. fuscus from the Brazilian coast.

Conclusion: The karyotypic evolution of Stegastes was predominantly driven by multiple pericentric inversions (and/or centromere shifts), resulting in changes in the internal organization of chromosomes. S. rocasensis and S. sanctipauli have similar cytogenetical patterns, as well as S. fuscus and S. f. trindadensis indicating incipient evolutionary differentiation in insular species. Mapping other repetitive DNA sequences provided an exceptional opportunity to clarify chromosomal changes and their association with the evolutionary diversification of Stegastes species.

豆娘鱼是一种极其多样化的草食性鱼类,是珊瑚礁中重要的、无处不在的生态组成部分。在南大西洋西部,Stegastes属是最具代表性的,其进化路径和岛屿特有种的分类地位已得到较好的评价。为了阐明这一群体多样化的核型进化,对分布在巴西沿海地区的4个名义种(S. variabilis和S. fuscus)、来自罗卡斯环礁和圣保罗和 o Pedro群岛的S. rocasensis和S. sanctipauli)和一个亚种(来自Trindade和Martim Vaz群岛的S. fuscus trindadensis)进行了细胞遗传学分析。结果:采用经典细胞遗传学方法和18S和5S rDNA探针的荧光原位杂交(FISH)进行比较分析。所有物种有2n=48条染色体,高FN值在88 ~ 92之间。rocasensis与S. sanctipauli具有相同的细胞遗传模式,而S. f. trindadensis在巴西海岸的S. fuscus中没有发现18S和5S rDNA位点的同步排列。结论:Stegastes的核型进化主要是由多个中心倒位(和/或着丝粒移位)驱动的,从而导致染色体内部组织的变化。rocasensis和S. sanctipauli具有相似的细胞遗传模式,S. fuscus和S. trindadensis也具有相似的细胞遗传模式,表明岛屿物种的进化分化初期。绘制其他重复DNA序列提供了一个特殊的机会来澄清染色体变化及其与Stegastes物种进化多样化的关系。
{"title":"Karyoevolutionary Processes in Atlantic Damselfishes of the Genus <italic>Stegastes</italic> (Pomacentridae).","authors":"Marsílio S P Rocha, Gideão W W F Costa, Marcelo B Cioffi, Luiz A C Bertollo, Vanessa C S Oliveira, Karlla D J Amorim, Wagner F Molina","doi":"10.1159/000548331","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The damselfishes, an extremely diverse group of herbivorous fish, stands out as an important and ubiquitous ecological component of coral reefs. In the Western South Atlantic, the genus Stegastes is the most representative, whose evolutionary paths and taxonomic status of insular endemic species have been better evaluated. To clarify the karyotypic evolution involved in the diversification of this group, cytogenetic analyses were performed in four nominal species (Stegastes variabilis and Stegastes fuscus, distributed in Brazilian coastal regions; Stegastes rocasensis and Stegastes sanctipauli, from Rocas Atoll and São Paulo and São Pedro Archipelago) and one subspecies (S. fuscus trindadensis, from Trindade and Martim Vaz Archipelago).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Classical cytogenetic protocols and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S and 5S rDNA probes were used for comparative analyses. All species had 2n = 48 chromosomes, with high FN values ranging from 88 to 92. Stegastes rocasensis and S. sanctipauli shared identical cytogenetic patterns, while S. f. trindadensis revealed a syntenic arrangement of 18S and 5S rDNA sites not found in S. fuscus from the Brazilian coast.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The karyotypic evolution of Stegastes was predominantly driven by multiple pericentric inversions (and/or centromere shifts), resulting in changes in the internal organization of chromosomes. S. rocasensis and S. sanctipauli have similar cytogenetical patterns, as well as S. fuscus and S. f. trindadensis indicating incipient evolutionary differentiation in insular species. Mapping other repetitive DNA sequences provided an exceptional opportunity to clarify chromosomal changes and their association with the evolutionary diversification of Stegastes species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"20-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145005926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transposable Elements and Sex Chromosome Evolution in Eulimnadia texana. 德克萨斯独角草的转座因子与性染色体进化。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1159/000548721
Chathumadavi Ediriweera, Stephen C Weeks

Introduction: Sex chromosomes often evolve through suppressed recombination and accumulation of transposable elements (TEs) on the sex-limited chromosome, leading to divergence and eventual degeneration. The clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana possesses proto-sex chromosomes (Z and W) at an early evolutionary stage, providing a unique opportunity to examine the initial genomic changes underlying sex chromosome differentiation. Additionally, both sex chromosomes are expressed in homogametic ZZ and WW shrimp, allowing a regular expression of both sex chromosomes in homozygotes.

Methods: We analyzed newly assembled ZZ (male) and previously published WW (hermaphrodite) genomes of E. texana. Sex-linked markers were mapped to identify the Z chromosome. TEs were annotated using a species-specific repeat library and RepeatMasker. The Z and W chromosomes were divided into bins and randomization tests compared TE accumulation between the sex chromosomes as well as between corresponding regions within these two chromosomes; the latter was focused on the putative sex-determining regions of both the Z and W. Kimura distance-based analyses were used to estimate TE age divergence.

Results: The Z chromosome showed no significant TE enrichment relative to autosomes but was enriched for DNA transposons. The W chromosome exhibited significantly higher retrotransposon (LTR and LINE) accumulation. Only the sex-determining region of the W showed significantly elevated retrotransposon content compared to the Z. TE age landscapes indicated recent bursts of retrotransposon activity on the W.

Conclusion: These findings support theoretical predictions that retrotransposons accumulate in non-recombining regions, while DNA transposons are associated with recombining chromosomes. The W chromosome of E. texana shows early signs of differentiation, with localized retrotransposon buildup, while the Z remains autosome-like. This study highlights E. texana as a valuable model for understanding the genomic mechanisms of early sex chromosome evolution.

导言:性染色体通常通过限制性染色体上的抑制重组和转座因子(te)的积累而进化,导致分化并最终变性。蛤虾(Eulimnadia texana)在早期进化阶段具有原性染色体(Z和W),为研究性染色体分化的初始基因组变化提供了独特的机会。此外,这两条性染色体在同质ZZ和WW虾中都有表达,这使得这两条性染色体在纯合子中有规律的表达。方法:对新组装的德克萨斯棘猴ZZ(雄性)基因组和已发表的雌雄同体WW(雌雄同体)基因组进行分析。性别连锁标记被用来鉴定Z染色体。使用物种特异性重复序列库和RepeatMasker对te进行注释。将Z染色体和W染色体分箱,随机化试验比较性染色体间以及性染色体内相应区域间TE的积累情况;后者侧重于Z和w的假定性别决定区域。Kimura基于距离的分析用于估计TE年龄差异。结果:Z染色体相对于常染色体没有明显的TE富集,但DNA转座子富集。W染色体表现出较高的反转录转座子(LTR和LINE)积累。与z染色体相比,只有W染色体的性别决定区显示出显著升高的反转录转座子含量。TE年龄图表明,W染色体上最近爆发了反转录转座子活性。结论:这些发现支持了反转录转座子在非重组区域积累的理论预测,而DNA转座子与重组染色体有关。W染色体的大肠texana显示分化的早期迹象,局部逆转录转座子积聚,而Z仍然autosome-like。本研究强调德州棘豆为理解早期性染色体进化的基因组机制提供了一个有价值的模型。
{"title":"Transposable Elements and Sex Chromosome Evolution in <italic>Eulimnadia texana</italic>.","authors":"Chathumadavi Ediriweera, Stephen C Weeks","doi":"10.1159/000548721","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sex chromosomes often evolve through suppressed recombination and accumulation of transposable elements (TEs) on the sex-limited chromosome, leading to divergence and eventual degeneration. The clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana possesses proto-sex chromosomes (Z and W) at an early evolutionary stage, providing a unique opportunity to examine the initial genomic changes underlying sex chromosome differentiation. Additionally, both sex chromosomes are expressed in homogametic ZZ and WW shrimp, allowing a regular expression of both sex chromosomes in homozygotes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed newly assembled ZZ (male) and previously published WW (hermaphrodite) genomes of E. texana. Sex-linked markers were mapped to identify the Z chromosome. TEs were annotated using a species-specific repeat library and RepeatMasker. The Z and W chromosomes were divided into bins and randomization tests compared TE accumulation between the sex chromosomes as well as between corresponding regions within these two chromosomes; the latter was focused on the putative sex-determining regions of both the Z and W. Kimura distance-based analyses were used to estimate TE age divergence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Z chromosome showed no significant TE enrichment relative to autosomes but was enriched for DNA transposons. The W chromosome exhibited significantly higher retrotransposon (LTR and LINE) accumulation. Only the sex-determining region of the W showed significantly elevated retrotransposon content compared to the Z. TE age landscapes indicated recent bursts of retrotransposon activity on the W.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support theoretical predictions that retrotransposons accumulate in non-recombining regions, while DNA transposons are associated with recombining chromosomes. The W chromosome of E. texana shows early signs of differentiation, with localized retrotransposon buildup, while the Z remains autosome-like. This study highlights E. texana as a valuable model for understanding the genomic mechanisms of early sex chromosome evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"30-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum. 勘误表。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1159/000549238
<p><p>In ISCN 2024: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature [Cytogenet Genome Res 2024;164(suppl 1); https://doi.org/10.1159/000538512 and https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-07331-7] by Hastings RJ, Moore S, Chia N (editors), the following corrections to the ISCN should be noted. Please contact the ISCN Standing Committee via the forum if you identify any additional errata.In Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1 Chromosome Abnormality Description Rules, Rule f, the lineNeoplasia: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[10]/47,XX,t(9;22),+der(22)[10]Should correctly read:Neoplasia: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[10]/47,XX,t(9;22),+der(22)t(9;22)[10]In Chapter 4, Section 4.5.3k Nomenclature for Clones, Mosaics and Chimeras, the linesRelated neoplastic clones: 46,XX,del(7)(q22),+8[10]/46,XX,i(7)(q10),+8[12]Should correctly read:Related neoplastic clones: 47,XX,del(7)(q22),+8[10]/47,XX,i(7)(q10),+8[12]Related neoplastic clones: 46,XY,del(5)(q13q31),-7[3]/46,XY,del(5)(q13),-7[17]Should correctly read:Related neoplastic clones: 45,XY,del(5)(q13q31),-7[3]/45,XY,del(5)(q13),-7[17]In Chapter 5, Section 5.5.3 Derivative Chromosomes, Rule c, example iv, the lineThe additional derivative chromosome 4 is listed before the translocation following the chromosome order rule (see Section 4.3)Should correctly read:The additional derivative chromosome 4 is listed before the translocation following the alphabetical order rule (see Section 4.3)In Chapter 5, Section 5.4.1 Specification of Chromosomes and Breakpoints, Rule eAlternatively, uncertainty of breakpoints may be indicated by a question mark (?), e.g., 1p1? (see Section 4.2.1) or by a tilde (∼), e.g., 1p34∼p35 (see Section 4.2.1)Should correctly read:Alternatively, uncertainty of breakpoints may be indicated by a question mark (?), e.g., 1p1? (see Section 4.2.1) or by a tilde (∼), e.g., 1p35∼p34 (see Section 4.2.1)In Chapter 5, Section 5.4.1 Specification of Chromosomes and Breakpoints, Rule hIf the rearrangement involves a single chromosome the breakpoints are not separated by a semicolon (;), e.g., inv(2)(p23q11.2), del(4)(p15.3p16.1), r(18)(p11.2q23)Should correctly read:If the rearrangement involves a single chromosome the breakpoints are not separated by a semicolon (;), e.g., inv(2)(p23q11.2), del(4)(p16.1p15.3), r(18)(p11.2q23)In Chapter 5, Section 5.4.2 Karyotype format for Designing Structural Chromosome Abnormalities, Rule b, example i, the textThe abnormal chromosome 11 has resulted from a complex translocation involving chromosomes 5, 8 and 11, t(5;8;11;5)(q23;q24.1;q12;q11.2)Should correctly read:The abnormal chromosome 11 has resulted from a complex translocation involving chromosomes 5, 8 and 11, der(11)t(5;11)(q11.2;q12)t(5;8)(q23;q24.1)In Chapter 5, Section 5.5.9.2 Insertion between Two Chromosomes, Rule a, the linea. Interchromosomal insertions (ins) are three-break rearrangements in which part of one chromosome is inserted at a point of breakage in the same or another chromosomeShould correctly read:a
在ISCN 2024:人类细胞基因组命名的国际系统[Cytogenet Genome Res 2024;164(增刊);https://doi.org/10.1159/000538512和https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-07331-7]由Hastings RJ, Moore S, Chia N(编辑)编写,对ISCN的以下更正应注意。如果您发现任何额外的勘误表,请通过论坛与ISCN常务委员会联系。在第4章第4.2.1节染色体异常描述规则,规则f中,lineeneoplasia: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[10]/47,XX,t(9;22) (q34;q11.2)[10]/47,XX,t(9;22),+der(22)t(9;在第四章4.5.3k克隆、嵌合体和嵌合体的命名法中,相关肿瘤克隆:46,XX,del(7)(q22),+8[10]/46,XX,i(7)(q10),+8[12]应该正确阅读:相关肿瘤克隆:47,XX,del(7)(q22),+8[10]/47,XX,i(7)(q10),+8[12]相关肿瘤克隆:46,XY,del(5)(q13q31),-7[3]/46,XY,del(5)(q13),-7[17]应该正确阅读:相关肿瘤克隆:45, XY,德尔(5)(q13q31), 7 [3] / 45, XY,德尔(5)(问题),在第五章7[17],部分5.5.3衍生染色体,规则c,第四,lineThe额外衍生染色体4是上市之前之后的易位染色体秩序规则(参见4.3节)应该正确地读:额外的导数后染色体易位前4列字母顺序规则(见4.3节)在第5章、节5.4.1之前规范的染色体和断点,规则e或者,断点的不确定性可以用问号(?)表示,例如,1p1?(见第4.2.1节)或用波浪线(~)表示,例如,1p34 ~ p35(见第4.2.1节),应该正确阅读:或者,断点的不确定性可以用问号(?)表示,例如,1p1?(见第4.2.1节)或用波浪号(~),例如,1p35 ~ p34(见第4.2.1节)在第5章,第5.4.1节染色体和断点的说明,规则hIf重排涉及单个染色体,断点不被分号(;)分隔,例如,inv(2)(p23q11.2), del(4)(p15.3p16.1), r(18)(p11.2q23)应该正确阅读:如果重排涉及单个染色体,断点不被分号(;)分隔,例如,inv(2)(p23q11.2), del(4)(p16.1p15.3),r(18)(p11.2q23)在第5章,第5.4.2节设计结构染色体异常的核型格式,规则b,示例i中,文本异常的11号染色体是由涉及5、8、11号染色体的复杂易位引起的,t(5;8;11;5)(q23;q24.1;q12;q11.2)应该正确阅读:异常的11号染色体是由涉及5、8、11号染色体的复杂易位引起的,der(11)t(5;11)(q11.2;q12)t(5;8)(q23;q24.1)在第5章,5.5.9.2两条染色体之间的插入,规则a,线。染色体间插入(ins)是一种三断重排,其中一条染色体的一部分插入到相同或另一条染色体的断裂点。染色体间插入(ins)是一种三断重排,其中一条染色体的一部分插入到同源染色体或另一条染色体的断裂点上。在第5章5.5.11节中,规则e,例v,注释:如果不能证明21号染色体长臂的纯合性,则使用der(21)(q10;应正确阅读:注:如果不能证明21号染色体长臂的纯合性,可使用der(21;21)(q10;在第5章,第5.5.15节重组染色体,规则d,示例ii46,XX,rec(21)del(21)ins(21)(p13q22. 22.3)dpator46,XX,rec(21)(pter->q22.2::p22.3->qter) dpat应该正确阅读:46,XX,rec(21)del(21q)ins(21)(p13q22. 22.3)dpator46,XX,rec(21)(pter->q22.2::p22.3->qter)dpatIn第5章,第5.5.15节重组染色体,规则d,例iii46,XY,rec(1)dup(5q)ins(1;5)(q32;q11.2q22)dinh,der(5)ins(1;5)dinh,XY,rec(1)(1pter->1q32::5q11.2->5q22::5q22->5qter)dinh,der(5)(5pter->5q11.2::5q22->qter)dinh正确的阅读应该是:46,XY,rec(1) (1pter->1q32::5q11.2->5q22::5q22->5qter)dinh, XY,rec(1)(1pter->1q32::5q11.2->5q22::5q22->5qter)dinh,der(5)(5pter-> 1q32::5q11.2-> 5q11.2::5q22->qter)dinh第五章,第5.5.16.2节多染色体衍生的环染色体,规则h,line50,XX,+1,+3,+8,+r和50,xx,+1,+3,+8,+r和50,xx,+1,+3,+8,+r和51,xx,+1,+3,+8,+r,+marIn第6.3.4章克隆进化,规则f,例16,line5ISCN可能写的清晰完整:46,XY, 2, 9日添加(10)(q26),德尔(20)(q11.2q13.3) + mar1 + mar2 [15] / 44, XY, 2,添加(3)(p12), 5 + 8, 9, -10年,德尔(20),+ mar1[5]应该正确地读:46,XY, 2, 9日添加(10)(q26),德尔(20)(q11.2q13.3) + mar1 + mar2 [15] / 44, XY, 2,添加(3)(p12), 5 + 8, 9, -10年,德尔(20),+ mar1[5]章6.3.4克隆进化,图8所示。49,XY,t(9;22),+8,+19,+21正确的读作:49,XY,+8,t(9;22),+19,+21 规则g,注释中的例子vi:来自女性供体的十个中期也表现出一个宪制性的t(2;5)。正确解读:注:来自女性供体的十个中期也表现出构造性的t(2;15)。在第7章第7.3.4.4.1节单染色体正常信号模式中,linePDGFA探针信号应该正确读取:PDGFRA探针信号在第7章第7.6节嵌合和嵌合信号模式中,//nuc ish (DXZ1,DYZ3)×1[400]应该正确读取:nuc ish //(DXZ1,DYZ3)×1[400]在第8章第8.2.3节遗传中,当已知异常的亲本起源时,可能遵循拷贝数(x1,x3等)。应正确阅读:当已知异常的亲本来源时,遵循拷贝数(x1,x3等)。在第8章第8.2.5节混合细胞群和不确定拷贝数中,47岁的XY, + 3月[5]/ 46,XY[20]。伊什der (2) (p11.2q13) (rp11 - 478 d22摊位+)[5]/ 2 q12.1 (rp11 - 478 d22摊位)×2[
{"title":"Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000549238","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549238","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In ISCN 2024: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature [Cytogenet Genome Res 2024;164(suppl 1); https://doi.org/10.1159/000538512 and https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-07331-7] by Hastings RJ, Moore S, Chia N (editors), the following corrections to the ISCN should be noted. Please contact the ISCN Standing Committee via the forum if you identify any additional errata.In Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1 Chromosome Abnormality Description Rules, Rule f, the lineNeoplasia: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[10]/47,XX,t(9;22),+der(22)[10]Should correctly read:Neoplasia: 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[10]/47,XX,t(9;22),+der(22)t(9;22)[10]In Chapter 4, Section 4.5.3k Nomenclature for Clones, Mosaics and Chimeras, the linesRelated neoplastic clones: 46,XX,del(7)(q22),+8[10]/46,XX,i(7)(q10),+8[12]Should correctly read:Related neoplastic clones: 47,XX,del(7)(q22),+8[10]/47,XX,i(7)(q10),+8[12]Related neoplastic clones: 46,XY,del(5)(q13q31),-7[3]/46,XY,del(5)(q13),-7[17]Should correctly read:Related neoplastic clones: 45,XY,del(5)(q13q31),-7[3]/45,XY,del(5)(q13),-7[17]In Chapter 5, Section 5.5.3 Derivative Chromosomes, Rule c, example iv, the lineThe additional derivative chromosome 4 is listed before the translocation following the chromosome order rule (see Section 4.3)Should correctly read:The additional derivative chromosome 4 is listed before the translocation following the alphabetical order rule (see Section 4.3)In Chapter 5, Section 5.4.1 Specification of Chromosomes and Breakpoints, Rule eAlternatively, uncertainty of breakpoints may be indicated by a question mark (?), e.g., 1p1? (see Section 4.2.1) or by a tilde (∼), e.g., 1p34∼p35 (see Section 4.2.1)Should correctly read:Alternatively, uncertainty of breakpoints may be indicated by a question mark (?), e.g., 1p1? (see Section 4.2.1) or by a tilde (∼), e.g., 1p35∼p34 (see Section 4.2.1)In Chapter 5, Section 5.4.1 Specification of Chromosomes and Breakpoints, Rule hIf the rearrangement involves a single chromosome the breakpoints are not separated by a semicolon (;), e.g., inv(2)(p23q11.2), del(4)(p15.3p16.1), r(18)(p11.2q23)Should correctly read:If the rearrangement involves a single chromosome the breakpoints are not separated by a semicolon (;), e.g., inv(2)(p23q11.2), del(4)(p16.1p15.3), r(18)(p11.2q23)In Chapter 5, Section 5.4.2 Karyotype format for Designing Structural Chromosome Abnormalities, Rule b, example i, the textThe abnormal chromosome 11 has resulted from a complex translocation involving chromosomes 5, 8 and 11, t(5;8;11;5)(q23;q24.1;q12;q11.2)Should correctly read:The abnormal chromosome 11 has resulted from a complex translocation involving chromosomes 5, 8 and 11, der(11)t(5;11)(q11.2;q12)t(5;8)(q23;q24.1)In Chapter 5, Section 5.5.9.2 Insertion between Two Chromosomes, Rule a, the linea. Interchromosomal insertions (ins) are three-break rearrangements in which part of one chromosome is inserted at a point of breakage in the same or another chromosomeShould correctly read:a","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"64-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145741493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterization of DMRT1 Variants for Testis Determination and Differentiation in Emu. 鸸鹋睾丸测定和分化的DMRT1变异特征。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1159/000548251
Yuki Kimura, Miki Okuno, Luisa Matiz-Ceron, Shusei Mizushima, Shoichiro Mitsukawa, Yutaka Suzuki, Takehiko Itoh, Asato Kuroiwa

Introduction: DMRT1 on the Z chromosome is a conserved male sex-determining gene in birds. In chickens, a representative model species of Neognathae, the function of DMRT1 has been well characterized. In contrast, Palaeognathae species such as the emu possess less differentiated sex chromosomes and thus provide a valuable system for investigating avian sex determination, yet molecular studies remain limited. We investigated the timing of sex determination and the expression of key genes involved in gonadal differentiation in emu and further characterized DMRT1 variants.

Methods: Sex determination stage was identified by anatomical comparison of male and female embryonic gonads. Expression of seven genes (DMRT1, AMH, SOX9, NR5A1, FOXL2, CYP19A1, and RSPO1) was examined by mRNA-seq and RT-PCR. DMRT1 splicing variants were predicted by in silico analysis and 3' RACE was used to identify alternative polyadenylation (APA) variants.

Results: The gonadal differentiation occurred at HH25-28 based on gonadal morphology. Gene expression analysis revealed emu-specific patterns not observed in chickens. Notably, RSPO1 was highly expressed in females at HH24-25, preceding DMRT1 expression in males at HH28-29, suggesting ovarian differentiation begins earlier. We identified three splicing variants and four APA variants of DMRT1, with variant 1 predominant during gonadal development.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that while molecular sex differentiation mechanisms are largely conserved between Palaeognathae and Neognathae, they differ in parts. In particular, early RSPO1 expression may initiate ovarian differentiation prior to testis determination by DMRT1. The presence of emu-specific DMRT1 variants further indicates possible species-specific mechanisms in testis development.

简介:鸟类Z染色体上的DMRT1是一个保守的雄性性别决定基因。在鸡中,DMRT1的功能已经被很好地表征。相比之下,鸸鹋等古龙目物种的性染色体分化程度较低,因此为研究鸟类性别决定提供了有价值的系统,但分子研究仍然有限。我们研究了鸸鹋性别决定的时间和参与性腺分化的关键基因的表达,并进一步表征了DMRT1变异。方法:通过对雌雄胚胎性腺的解剖比较,确定性别决定阶段。采用mRNA-seq和RT-PCR检测7个基因(DMRT1、AMH、SOX9、NR5A1、FOXL2、CYP19A1和RSPO1)的表达情况。DMRT1剪接变异通过硅分析预测,3' RACE用于鉴定可选的聚腺苷酸化(APA)变异。结果:HH25-28在性腺形态上发生了性腺分化。基因表达分析显示鸸鹋特有的模式在鸡中没有观察到。值得注意的是,RSPO1在女性HH24-25时高表达,高于男性HH28-29时DMRT1的表达,表明卵巢分化开始得更早。我们鉴定了DMRT1的三种剪接变体和四种APA变体,其中变体1在性腺发育中占主导地位。结论:这些发现表明,尽管古龙目与新龙目之间的分子性别分化机制在很大程度上是保守的,但它们之间存在部分差异。特别是,早期RSPO1表达可能在DMRT1测定睾丸之前启动卵巢分化。鸸鹋特异性DMRT1变异的存在进一步表明睾丸发育中可能存在物种特异性机制。
{"title":"Characterization of <italic>DMRT1</italic> Variants for Testis Determination and Differentiation in Emu.","authors":"Yuki Kimura, Miki Okuno, Luisa Matiz-Ceron, Shusei Mizushima, Shoichiro Mitsukawa, Yutaka Suzuki, Takehiko Itoh, Asato Kuroiwa","doi":"10.1159/000548251","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>DMRT1 on the Z chromosome is a conserved male sex-determining gene in birds. In chickens, a representative model species of Neognathae, the function of DMRT1 has been well characterized. In contrast, Palaeognathae species such as the emu possess less differentiated sex chromosomes and thus provide a valuable system for investigating avian sex determination, yet molecular studies remain limited. We investigated the timing of sex determination and the expression of key genes involved in gonadal differentiation in emu and further characterized DMRT1 variants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sex determination stage was identified by anatomical comparison of male and female embryonic gonads. Expression of seven genes (DMRT1, AMH, SOX9, NR5A1, FOXL2, CYP19A1, and RSPO1) was examined by mRNA-seq and RT-PCR. DMRT1 splicing variants were predicted by in silico analysis and 3' RACE was used to identify alternative polyadenylation (APA) variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gonadal differentiation occurred at HH25-28 based on gonadal morphology. Gene expression analysis revealed emu-specific patterns not observed in chickens. Notably, RSPO1 was highly expressed in females at HH24-25, preceding DMRT1 expression in males at HH28-29, suggesting ovarian differentiation begins earlier. We identified three splicing variants and four APA variants of DMRT1, with variant 1 predominant during gonadal development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that while molecular sex differentiation mechanisms are largely conserved between Palaeognathae and Neognathae, they differ in parts. In particular, early RSPO1 expression may initiate ovarian differentiation prior to testis determination by DMRT1. The presence of emu-specific DMRT1 variants further indicates possible species-specific mechanisms in testis development.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"6-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robertsonian Translocation Rob(13;19) Identified in Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus, Rodentia). 在豚鼠(啮齿目Cavia porcellus)中发现Robertsonian易位罗布(13;19)。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-04 DOI: 10.1159/000548825
Halina Cernohorska, Svatava Kubickova, Petra Musilova, Miluse Vozdova

Introduction: The domestic guinea pig (Cavia porcellus, Caviidae) is an important laboratory species, model for human medical research, worldwide spread pet and a source of food in specific parts of South America. Data on chromosomal abnormalities in guinea pigs are really limited, probably due to the complexity of their karyotype (2n = 64).

Methods: G- and C-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using human chromosome-specific painting probes were used to analyze the karyotype and identify chromosomes involved in a newly discovered Robertsonian translocation.

Results: Karyotype 63,XY,rob(13;19) was revealed in a phenotypically normal, fertile domestic guinea pig male. The chromosomes involved in the fusion were verified using FISH with human whole chromosome probes and known guinea pig - human chromosome synteny.

Conclusion: This finding adds to the limited cytogenetic data available on the guinea pig, and provides a basis for further investigation of their chromosomal variation and its biological significance. Our results indicate the need for chromosome studies in this cytogenetically mostly neglected species, especially in breeding populations used for biomedical research.

简介:国内豚鼠(豚鼠科)是一种重要的实验室物种,是人类医学研究的模型,是世界范围内传播的宠物,也是南美洲特定地区的食物来源。关于豚鼠染色体异常的数据确实有限,可能是由于其核型的复杂性(2n = 64)。方法:利用人类染色体特异性绘画探针,采用g -和c -带和荧光原位杂交(FISH)技术对新发现的Robertsonian易位进行核型分析和染色体鉴定。结果:在一只表型正常、可生育的家养雄性豚鼠中发现了63、XY、rob(13;19)的核型。参与融合的染色体使用FISH与人类全染色体探针和已知的豚鼠-人染色体合群进行验证。结论:这一发现补充了现有豚鼠细胞遗传学资料的不足,为进一步研究豚鼠染色体变异及其生物学意义提供了基础。我们的结果表明,有必要对这种细胞遗传学上大多被忽视的物种进行染色体研究,特别是在用于生物医学研究的育种群体中。
{"title":"Robertsonian Translocation Rob(13;19) Identified in Guinea Pig (<italic>Cavia porcellus</italic>, Rodentia).","authors":"Halina Cernohorska, Svatava Kubickova, Petra Musilova, Miluse Vozdova","doi":"10.1159/000548825","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548825","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The domestic guinea pig (Cavia porcellus, Caviidae) is an important laboratory species, model for human medical research, worldwide spread pet and a source of food in specific parts of South America. Data on chromosomal abnormalities in guinea pigs are really limited, probably due to the complexity of their karyotype (2n = 64).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>G- and C-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using human chromosome-specific painting probes were used to analyze the karyotype and identify chromosomes involved in a newly discovered Robertsonian translocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Karyotype 63,XY,rob(13;19) was revealed in a phenotypically normal, fertile domestic guinea pig male. The chromosomes involved in the fusion were verified using FISH with human whole chromosome probes and known guinea pig - human chromosome synteny.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This finding adds to the limited cytogenetic data available on the guinea pig, and provides a basis for further investigation of their chromosomal variation and its biological significance. Our results indicate the need for chromosome studies in this cytogenetically mostly neglected species, especially in breeding populations used for biomedical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Molecular Characterization of MECOM Rearrangements in Two Cases with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and t(2;3)(p23;q26.2). 2例骨髓增生异常综合征和t(2;3) MECOM重排的分子特征(p23;q26.2)。
IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1159/000550151
Zhongxia Qi, Sonam Prakash, Jingwei Yu

Introduction MECOM rearrangements are frequently observed in myeloid neoplasms and associated with poor prognosis. Among the genomic alterations leading to MECOM rearrangements, t(2;3)(p13~p25;q26.2) accounts for approximately 13% of reported cases. However, the precise DNA breakpoints of this translocation have not been previously reported, nor has the mechanism by which it alters MECOM expression been fully elucidated. In this report, we describe two cases with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and t(2;3)(p23;q26.2). Our genomic characterization of these two t(2;3) translocations provided insights into the molecular mechanism of MECOM activation. Case Presentation Case 1 is a 44-year-old female presented with new anemia and thrombocytopenia. She was treated with azacitidine. After two allogeneic stem cell transplants, her disease relapsed with rapid progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patient passed away one year after progression to AML and eight years after initial diagnosis. Case 2 is a 75-year-old female who was incidentally found to have macrocytic anemia with rare circulating blasts. She remained asymptomatic from anemia and did not require transfusions or treatment. Her disease progressed to MDS with excess blasts three years later. Patient was treated with azacitidine. Fifteen months later, her disease further progressed to AML. She passed away five months later and four and a half years after initial diagnosis. DNA sequencing analysis of these two cases revealed that the t(2;3)(p23;q26.2) breakpoints were within the regulatory regions of ZFP36L2 and THADA on chromosome 2 and the proximity of MECOM on chromosome 3, creating a novel regulatory configuration for MECOM. Notably, the translocation breakpoints differed by 270 kb on chromosome 2 and 93 kb on chromosome 3, resulting in distinct translocated regulatory elements with varying sizes and proximities to MECOM. These structural differences may influence the level of MECOM upregulation and contribute to variation in disease severity and progression. Conclusion Our findings highlighted that, despite cytogenetic similarity, different t(2;3) translocations may exert distinct regulatory effects depending on the precise breakpoint locations. Thus, molecular characterization of MECOM rearrangements is critical for understanding disease pathogenesis and prognosis in myeloid neoplasms and may lead to the development of novel treatment.

髓系肿瘤中经常观察到MECOM重排,并伴有不良预后。在导致MECOM重排的基因组改变中,t(2;3)(p13~p25;q26.2)约占报告病例的13%。然而,这种易位的精确DNA断点以前没有报道过,也没有完全阐明它改变MECOM表达的机制。在本报告中,我们描述了两例骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和t(2;3)(p23;q26.2)。我们对这两个t(2;3)易位的基因组表征为MECOM激活的分子机制提供了见解。病例1是一名44岁女性,新发贫血和血小板减少症。她接受了阿扎胞苷治疗。在两次异体干细胞移植后,她的疾病复发并迅速发展为急性髓性白血病(AML)。患者在进展为急性髓性白血病后一年和初次诊断后八年去世。病例2为75岁女性,偶然发现有大细胞性贫血伴罕见循环母细胞。她仍然无贫血症状,不需要输血或治疗。三年后,她的疾病发展为MDS并伴有过多的原细胞。患者给予阿扎胞苷治疗。15个月后,她的病情进一步发展为急性髓性白血病。她在5个月后去世,在初步诊断后4年半。对这两个病例进行DNA测序分析,发现t(2;3)(p23;q26.2)断点位于2号染色体上ZFP36L2和THADA的调控区域,以及3号染色体上MECOM的邻近区域,这为MECOM创造了一种新的调控结构。值得注意的是,易位断点在2号染色体上相差270 kb,在3号染色体上相差93 kb,导致不同大小和接近MECOM的易位调控元件不同。这些结构差异可能影响MECOM的上调水平,并导致疾病严重程度和进展的变化。我们的研究结果强调,尽管细胞遗传学相似,不同的t(2;3)易位可能会发挥不同的调节作用,这取决于精确的断点位置。因此,MECOM重排的分子特征对于理解髓系肿瘤的发病机制和预后至关重要,并可能导致新的治疗方法的发展。
{"title":"Molecular Characterization of MECOM Rearrangements in Two Cases with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and t(2;3)(p23;q26.2).","authors":"Zhongxia Qi, Sonam Prakash, Jingwei Yu","doi":"10.1159/000550151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction MECOM rearrangements are frequently observed in myeloid neoplasms and associated with poor prognosis. Among the genomic alterations leading to MECOM rearrangements, t(2;3)(p13~p25;q26.2) accounts for approximately 13% of reported cases. However, the precise DNA breakpoints of this translocation have not been previously reported, nor has the mechanism by which it alters MECOM expression been fully elucidated. In this report, we describe two cases with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and t(2;3)(p23;q26.2). Our genomic characterization of these two t(2;3) translocations provided insights into the molecular mechanism of MECOM activation. Case Presentation Case 1 is a 44-year-old female presented with new anemia and thrombocytopenia. She was treated with azacitidine. After two allogeneic stem cell transplants, her disease relapsed with rapid progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patient passed away one year after progression to AML and eight years after initial diagnosis. Case 2 is a 75-year-old female who was incidentally found to have macrocytic anemia with rare circulating blasts. She remained asymptomatic from anemia and did not require transfusions or treatment. Her disease progressed to MDS with excess blasts three years later. Patient was treated with azacitidine. Fifteen months later, her disease further progressed to AML. She passed away five months later and four and a half years after initial diagnosis. DNA sequencing analysis of these two cases revealed that the t(2;3)(p23;q26.2) breakpoints were within the regulatory regions of ZFP36L2 and THADA on chromosome 2 and the proximity of MECOM on chromosome 3, creating a novel regulatory configuration for MECOM. Notably, the translocation breakpoints differed by 270 kb on chromosome 2 and 93 kb on chromosome 3, resulting in distinct translocated regulatory elements with varying sizes and proximities to MECOM. These structural differences may influence the level of MECOM upregulation and contribute to variation in disease severity and progression. Conclusion Our findings highlighted that, despite cytogenetic similarity, different t(2;3) translocations may exert distinct regulatory effects depending on the precise breakpoint locations. Thus, molecular characterization of MECOM rearrangements is critical for understanding disease pathogenesis and prognosis in myeloid neoplasms and may lead to the development of novel treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145793450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cytogenetic and Genome Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1