首页 > 最新文献

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus最新文献

英文 中文
The Belsey Mark IV procedure in the era of minimally invasive antireflux surgery. 微创抗反流手术时代的Belsey Mark IV手术。
Sander Ovaere, Lieven Depypere, Hans Van Veer, Johnny Moons, Philippe Nafteux, Willy Coosemans

Background: Different surgical techniques exist in the treatment of giant and complex hiatal hernia. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the Belsey Mark IV (BMIV) antireflux procedure in the era of minimally invasive techniques.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted. All patients who underwent an elective BMIV procedure aged 18 years or older, during a 15-year period (January 1, 2002 until December 31, 2016), were included. Demographics, pre-, per- and postoperative data were analyzed. Three groups were compared. Group A: BMIV as first procedure-group B: BMIV as a second procedure (first redo intervention)-group C: patients who had two or more previous antireflux interventions.

Results: A total of 216 patients were included for analysis (group A n = 127; group B n = 51; group C n = 38). Median follow-up in groups A, B and C was 28, 48 and 56 months, respectively. Patients in group A were older and had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared to groups B and C. There was zero mortality in all groups. The severe complication rate of 7.9% in group A was higher compared with the 2.9% in group B and 3.9% in group C. Long-term outcome showed true recurrence, defined as both radiographic recurrence as well as associated symptoms, in 9.5% of cases in group A, 24.5% in group B and 44.7% in group C.

Conclusions: The BMIV procedure is a safe procedure with good results, moreover in the aging and comorbid patient with primary repair of a giant hiatal hernia.

背景:巨大裂孔疝和复杂裂孔疝的手术方法不同。本研究的目的是确定Belsey Mark IV (BMIV)抗反流手术在微创技术时代的作用。方法:采用单中心、回顾性队列研究。在15年期间(2002年1月1日至2016年12月31日),所有年龄在18岁或以上接受选择性BMIV手术的患者均被纳入研究。对人口统计学、术前、术后数据进行分析。三组比较。A组:BMIV作为第一种手术;B组:BMIV作为第二种手术(第一次重做干预);C组:既往有两次或两次以上抗反流干预的患者。结果:共纳入216例患者进行分析(A组n = 127;B组n = 51;C组n = 38)。A、B、C组中位随访时间分别为28、48、56个月。与B组和c组相比,A组患者年龄较大,美国麻醉医师学会评分较高。所有组的死亡率均为零。A组的严重并发症发生率为7.9%,高于B组的2.9%和c组的3.9%。长期预后显示真正的复发,定义为放射学复发和相关症状,A组为9.5%,B组为24.5%,c组为44.7%。结论:BMIV手术是一种安全的手术,效果良好,而且对于年龄和合并症的原发性巨大裂孔疝修复患者也是如此。
{"title":"The Belsey Mark IV procedure in the era of minimally invasive antireflux surgery.","authors":"Sander Ovaere, Lieven Depypere, Hans Van Veer, Johnny Moons, Philippe Nafteux, Willy Coosemans","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad042","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different surgical techniques exist in the treatment of giant and complex hiatal hernia. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the Belsey Mark IV (BMIV) antireflux procedure in the era of minimally invasive techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted. All patients who underwent an elective BMIV procedure aged 18 years or older, during a 15-year period (January 1, 2002 until December 31, 2016), were included. Demographics, pre-, per- and postoperative data were analyzed. Three groups were compared. Group A: BMIV as first procedure-group B: BMIV as a second procedure (first redo intervention)-group C: patients who had two or more previous antireflux interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 patients were included for analysis (group A n = 127; group B n = 51; group C n = 38). Median follow-up in groups A, B and C was 28, 48 and 56 months, respectively. Patients in group A were older and had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared to groups B and C. There was zero mortality in all groups. The severe complication rate of 7.9% in group A was higher compared with the 2.9% in group B and 3.9% in group C. Long-term outcome showed true recurrence, defined as both radiographic recurrence as well as associated symptoms, in 9.5% of cases in group A, 24.5% in group B and 44.7% in group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BMIV procedure is a safe procedure with good results, moreover in the aging and comorbid patient with primary repair of a giant hiatal hernia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9755161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of artificial intelligence in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 人工智能在食管癌内镜诊断中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Nadia Guidozzi, Nainika Menon, Swathikan Chidambaram, Sheraz Rehan Markar

Early detection of esophageal cancer is limited by accurate endoscopic diagnosis of subtle macroscopic lesions. Endoscopic interpretation is subject to expertise, diagnostic skill, and thus human error. Artificial intelligence (AI) in endoscopy is increasingly bridging this gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis consolidate the evidence on the use of AI in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer. The systematic review was carried out using Pubmed, MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases and articles on the role of AI in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer management were included. A meta-analysis was also performed. Fourteen studies (1590 patients) assessed the use of AI in endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 91.2% (84.3-95.2%) and 80% (64.3-89.9%). Nine studies (478 patients) assessed AI capabilities of diagnosing esophageal adenocarcinoma with the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93.1% (86.8-96.4) and 86.9% (81.7-90.7). The remaining studies formed the qualitative summary. AI technology, as an adjunct to endoscopy, can assist in accurate, early detection of esophageal malignancy. It has shown superior results to endoscopists alone in identifying early cancer and assessing depth of tumor invasion, with the added benefit of not requiring a specialized skill set. Despite promising results, the application in real-time endoscopy is limited, and further multicenter trials are required to accurately assess its use in routine practice.

早期发现食管癌是有限的内镜准确诊断细微的宏观病变。内窥镜解释受专业知识、诊断技能和人为错误的影响。内窥镜领域的人工智能(AI)正日益弥合这一差距。本系统综述和荟萃分析巩固了人工智能在食管癌内镜诊断中的应用证据。采用Pubmed、MEDLINE和Ovid EMBASE数据库进行系统评价,纳入人工智能在食管癌内镜诊断中的作用。还进行了荟萃分析。14项研究(1590例患者)评估了AI在食管鳞状细胞癌内镜诊断中的应用,其敏感性和特异性分别为91.2%(84.3-95.2%)和80%(64.3-89.9%)。9项研究(478例患者)评估了人工智能诊断食管腺癌的能力,其总敏感性和特异性分别为93.1%(86.8-96.4)和86.9%(81.7-90.7)。其余的研究形成了定性总结。人工智能技术作为内窥镜检查的辅助手段,可以帮助准确、早期地发现食管恶性肿瘤。在识别早期癌症和评估肿瘤侵袭深度方面,它比内窥镜医生表现出更好的结果,而且不需要专门的技能。尽管有很好的结果,但在实时内窥镜检查中的应用是有限的,需要进一步的多中心试验来准确评估其在常规实践中的应用。
{"title":"The role of artificial intelligence in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nadia Guidozzi, Nainika Menon, Swathikan Chidambaram, Sheraz Rehan Markar","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad048","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of esophageal cancer is limited by accurate endoscopic diagnosis of subtle macroscopic lesions. Endoscopic interpretation is subject to expertise, diagnostic skill, and thus human error. Artificial intelligence (AI) in endoscopy is increasingly bridging this gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis consolidate the evidence on the use of AI in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer. The systematic review was carried out using Pubmed, MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases and articles on the role of AI in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer management were included. A meta-analysis was also performed. Fourteen studies (1590 patients) assessed the use of AI in endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 91.2% (84.3-95.2%) and 80% (64.3-89.9%). Nine studies (478 patients) assessed AI capabilities of diagnosing esophageal adenocarcinoma with the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93.1% (86.8-96.4) and 86.9% (81.7-90.7). The remaining studies formed the qualitative summary. AI technology, as an adjunct to endoscopy, can assist in accurate, early detection of esophageal malignancy. It has shown superior results to endoscopists alone in identifying early cancer and assessing depth of tumor invasion, with the added benefit of not requiring a specialized skill set. Despite promising results, the application in real-time endoscopy is limited, and further multicenter trials are required to accurately assess its use in routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9854161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on incident and prevalent esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett's esophagus. 种族/民族和社会经济地位对巴雷特食管患者食管癌发病率和流行率的影响
Margaret J Zhou, Uri Ladabaum, George Triadafilopoulos, John O Clarke

The impact of race/ethnicity (RE) or socioeconomic status (SES) on progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal cancer (EC) is not well established. We aimed to evaluate the association between demographic factors and SES on EC diagnosis in an ethnically diverse BE cohort. Patients aged 18-63 with incident BE diagnosed in October 2015-March 2020 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics DataMart Database. Patients were followed until the diagnosis of prevalent EC <1 year or incident EC ≥1 year from BE diagnosis, or until the end of their continuous enrollment period. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine associations between demographics, SES factors, BE risk factors, and EC. Demographics of the 12,693 patients included mean age of BE diagnosis 53.0 (SD 8.5) years, 56.4% male, 78.3% White/10.0% Hispanic/6.4% Black/3.0% Asian. The median follow-up was 26.8 (IQR 19.0-42.0) months. In total, 75 patients (0.59%) were diagnosed with EC (46 [0.36%] prevalent EC; 29 [0.23%] incident EC), and 74 patients (0.58%) developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (46 [0.36%] prevalent HGD; 28 [0.22%] incident HGD). Adjusted HR (95% CI) for prevalent EC comparing household net worth ≥$150,000 vs. <$150,000 was 0.57 (0.33-0.98). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for prevalent and incident EC comparing non-White vs. White patients were 0.93 (0.47-1.85) and 0.97 (0.21-3.47), respectively. In summary, a lower SES, captured by the household net worth, was associated with prevalent EC. There was no significant difference in prevalent or incident EC among White vs. non-White patients. EC progression in BE may be similar among racial/ethnic groups, but SES disparities may impact BE outcomes.

种族/民族(RE)或社会经济地位(SES)对从巴雷特食管(BE)到食管癌(EC)进展的影响尚未得到很好的证实。我们的目的是评估不同种族的BE队列中人口学因素与SES对EC诊断的关系。2015年10月至2020年3月诊断的18-63岁BE事件患者在Optum Clinformatics DataMart数据库中被确定。对患者进行随访,直至诊断出普遍的EC
{"title":"Impact of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on incident and prevalent esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett's esophagus.","authors":"Margaret J Zhou, Uri Ladabaum, George Triadafilopoulos, John O Clarke","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad044","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of race/ethnicity (RE) or socioeconomic status (SES) on progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal cancer (EC) is not well established. We aimed to evaluate the association between demographic factors and SES on EC diagnosis in an ethnically diverse BE cohort. Patients aged 18-63 with incident BE diagnosed in October 2015-March 2020 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics DataMart Database. Patients were followed until the diagnosis of prevalent EC <1 year or incident EC ≥1 year from BE diagnosis, or until the end of their continuous enrollment period. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine associations between demographics, SES factors, BE risk factors, and EC. Demographics of the 12,693 patients included mean age of BE diagnosis 53.0 (SD 8.5) years, 56.4% male, 78.3% White/10.0% Hispanic/6.4% Black/3.0% Asian. The median follow-up was 26.8 (IQR 19.0-42.0) months. In total, 75 patients (0.59%) were diagnosed with EC (46 [0.36%] prevalent EC; 29 [0.23%] incident EC), and 74 patients (0.58%) developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (46 [0.36%] prevalent HGD; 28 [0.22%] incident HGD). Adjusted HR (95% CI) for prevalent EC comparing household net worth ≥$150,000 vs. <$150,000 was 0.57 (0.33-0.98). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for prevalent and incident EC comparing non-White vs. White patients were 0.93 (0.47-1.85) and 0.97 (0.21-3.47), respectively. In summary, a lower SES, captured by the household net worth, was associated with prevalent EC. There was no significant difference in prevalent or incident EC among White vs. non-White patients. EC progression in BE may be similar among racial/ethnic groups, but SES disparities may impact BE outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10143818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic review of quality of life after esophagectomy and total gastrectomy in patients with gastro-esophageal junction cancer. 胃-食管结癌患者食管切除术和全胃切除术后生活质量的系统评价。
James Walmsley, Arun Ariyarathenam, Richard Berrisford, Lee Humphreys, Grant Sanders, Ji Chung Tham, Tim Wheatley, David S Y Chan

The optimal management of cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) is an area of contention. GEJ tumors are typically resected via total gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Despite many studies aiming to determine the superiority of either procedure based on surgical or oncological outcomes, the evidence is equivocal. Data focusing specifically on quality of life (QoL), however, is limited. This systematic review was performed to determine if there is any difference in patient's QoL after total gastrectomy or esophagectomy. A systematic search of PubMed, Medline and Cochrane libraries was conducted for literature published between 1986 and 2023. Studies that used the internationally validated questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-OG25, to compare QoL after esophagectomy to gastrectomy for the management of GEJ cancer were included. Five studies involving 575 patients undergoing either esophagectomy (n = 365) or total gastrectomy (n = 210) for GEJ tumors were included. QoL was predominantly assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Although individual studies demonstrated significant differences in certain domains, these differences were not consistently demonstrated in more than one study. There is no evidence to suggest any significant differences in QoL after total gastrectomy compared to esophagectomy for management of gastro-esophageal junction cancer.

胃食管交界处癌(GEJ)的最佳治疗是一个有争议的领域。GEJ肿瘤通常通过全胃切除术或食管切除术切除。尽管许多研究旨在确定基于手术或肿瘤结果的任何一种方法的优越性,但证据是模棱两可的。然而,专门关注生活质量(QoL)的数据有限。本系统评价是为了确定全胃切除术和食管切除术后患者的生活质量是否有任何差异。对PubMed、Medline和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统检索,检索了1986年至2023年间发表的文献。采用国际认可的问卷EORTC QLQ-C30和EORTC- qlq - og25,比较食管切除术和胃切除术治疗GEJ癌后的生活质量。5项研究包括575例接受食管切除术(n = 365)或全胃切除术(n = 210)治疗GEJ肿瘤的患者。主要在术后6、12和24个月评估生活质量。尽管个别研究表明在某些领域存在显著差异,但这些差异并没有在多个研究中得到一致的证明。没有证据表明胃-食管结癌全胃切除术与食管切除术在生活质量上有显著差异。
{"title":"Systematic review of quality of life after esophagectomy and total gastrectomy in patients with gastro-esophageal junction cancer.","authors":"James Walmsley, Arun Ariyarathenam, Richard Berrisford, Lee Humphreys, Grant Sanders, Ji Chung Tham, Tim Wheatley, David S Y Chan","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad039","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal management of cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) is an area of contention. GEJ tumors are typically resected via total gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Despite many studies aiming to determine the superiority of either procedure based on surgical or oncological outcomes, the evidence is equivocal. Data focusing specifically on quality of life (QoL), however, is limited. This systematic review was performed to determine if there is any difference in patient's QoL after total gastrectomy or esophagectomy. A systematic search of PubMed, Medline and Cochrane libraries was conducted for literature published between 1986 and 2023. Studies that used the internationally validated questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-OG25, to compare QoL after esophagectomy to gastrectomy for the management of GEJ cancer were included. Five studies involving 575 patients undergoing either esophagectomy (n = 365) or total gastrectomy (n = 210) for GEJ tumors were included. QoL was predominantly assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Although individual studies demonstrated significant differences in certain domains, these differences were not consistently demonstrated in more than one study. There is no evidence to suggest any significant differences in QoL after total gastrectomy compared to esophagectomy for management of gastro-esophageal junction cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9588454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum: a retrospective multicenter study. 经口内窥镜肌切开术是治疗Zenker憩室安全有效的方法:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Marc A Ward, Lucas Fair, Jennifer Misenhimer, Simón Esteva, Ian Greenberg, Gerald Ogola, Bola Aladegbami, Steven G Leeds, Prashant Kedia

Zenker per-oral endoscopic myotomy (ZPOEM) has become a promising technique for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). The aim of this study was to add to the limited body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of ZPOEM. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent ZPOEM at two separate institutions between January 2020 and January 2022. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, intraoperative data, adverse events, and length of stay were analyzed. A total of 40 patients (mean age 72.5 years, 62.5% male) were included. Average operative time was 54.7 minutes and average length of stay was 1.1 days. There were three adverse events, and only one was related to the technical aspects of the procedure. Patients showed improvement in the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores at 1 month (5 vs 7, p < 0.0001). The median FOIS scores remained 7 at both 6 and 12 months, although this improvement was not statistically significant at these time intervals (p = 0.46 and 0.37, respectively). Median dysphagia scores were decreased at 1 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), 6 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), and 12 months (2.5 vs 0, p = 0.016). The number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom was also decreased at 1 (40 vs 9, p < 0.0001) and 6 months (40 vs 1, p = 0.041). Although the number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom remained consistent at 12 months, this was not statistically significant (40 vs 1, p = 0.13). ZPOEM is a safe and highly effective treatment for the management of ZD. .

Zenker经口内窥镜肌切开术(ZPOEM)是治疗Zenker憩室(ZD)的一种很有前途的技术。本研究的目的是补充有限的文献来评估ZPOEM的安全性和有效性。回顾性审查前瞻性维护的数据库,以确定2020年1月至2022年1月期间在两个独立机构接受ZPOEM治疗的患者。分析了人口统计学、术前和术后临床资料、术中资料、不良事件和住院时间。共纳入40例患者,平均年龄72.5岁,男性62.5%。平均手术时间54.7分钟,平均住院时间1.1天。有三个不良事件,其中只有一个与手术的技术方面有关。患者在1个月时功能性口服摄入量表(FOIS)评分有所改善(5 vs 7, p
{"title":"Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum: a retrospective multicenter study.","authors":"Marc A Ward, Lucas Fair, Jennifer Misenhimer, Simón Esteva, Ian Greenberg, Gerald Ogola, Bola Aladegbami, Steven G Leeds, Prashant Kedia","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad041","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zenker per-oral endoscopic myotomy (ZPOEM) has become a promising technique for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). The aim of this study was to add to the limited body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of ZPOEM. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent ZPOEM at two separate institutions between January 2020 and January 2022. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, intraoperative data, adverse events, and length of stay were analyzed. A total of 40 patients (mean age 72.5 years, 62.5% male) were included. Average operative time was 54.7 minutes and average length of stay was 1.1 days. There were three adverse events, and only one was related to the technical aspects of the procedure. Patients showed improvement in the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores at 1 month (5 vs 7, p < 0.0001). The median FOIS scores remained 7 at both 6 and 12 months, although this improvement was not statistically significant at these time intervals (p = 0.46 and 0.37, respectively). Median dysphagia scores were decreased at 1 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), 6 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), and 12 months (2.5 vs 0, p = 0.016). The number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom was also decreased at 1 (40 vs 9, p < 0.0001) and 6 months (40 vs 1, p = 0.041). Although the number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom remained consistent at 12 months, this was not statistically significant (40 vs 1, p = 0.13). ZPOEM is a safe and highly effective treatment for the management of ZD. .</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9724953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival and perioperative outcomes of octo- and nonagenarians with resectable esophageal carcinoma. 八十岁及九十岁可切除食管癌患者的生存及围手术期预后。
Nabeel Ahmed, James Tankel, Jamil Asselah, Thierry Alcindor, Joanne Alfieri, Marc David, Sara Najmeh, Jonathan Spicer, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Carmen Mueller, Lorenzo Ferri

The outcomes of different treatment modalities for patients aged 80 and above with locally advanced and resectable esophageal carcinoma are not well described. The aim of this study was to explore survival and perioperative outcomes among this specific group of patients. A retrospective, cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained esophageal cancer database from the McGill regional upper gastroinestinal cancer network. Between 2010 and 2020, all patients ≥80 years with cT2-4a, Nany, M0 esophageal carcinoma were identified and stratified according to the treatment modality: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT); definitive CRT (dCRT); upfront surgery; palliative CT/RT; or best supportive care (BSC). Of the 162 patients identified, 79 were included in this study. The median age was 83 years (80-97), most were cT3 (73%), cN- (56%), and had adenocarcinoma (62%). Treatment included: nCT/nCRT (16/79, 20%); surgery alone (19/79, 24%); dCRT (12/29, 15%); palliative RT/CT (27/79, 34%); and BSC (5/79, 6%). Neoadjuvant treatment was completed in 10/16 (63%). Of the 35/79 who underwent surgery, major complications occurred in 13/35 (37%) and 90-day mortality in 3/35 (9%). Overall survival (OS) for the cohort at 1- and 3-years was 58% and 19%. Among patients treated with nCT/nCRT, this was 94% and 46% respectively. Curative intent treatment (nCT/nCRT/upfront surgery/dCRT) had significantly increased 1- and 3- year OS compared with non-curative treatment (76%/31% vs. 34%/3.3%). Multimodal standard of care treatment is feasible and safe in select octo/nonagenarians, and may be associated with improved OS. Age alone should not bias against treatment with curative intent.

不同治疗方式对80岁及以上的局部晚期和可切除食管癌患者的疗效还没有很好的描述。本研究的目的是探讨这一特定患者组的生存率和围手术期预后。对麦吉尔地区上消化道癌症网络前瞻性维护的食管癌数据库进行回顾性队列分析。2010年至2020年间,所有≥80岁的cT2-4a、Nany、M0型食管癌患者被确定并根据治疗方式进行分层:新辅助化疗(nCT)或放化疗(nCRT);定标CRT (dCRT);前期手术;缓和CT / RT;或最佳支持性护理(BSC)。在确定的162例患者中,79例纳入本研究。中位年龄83岁(80-97岁),多数为cT3(73%)、cN-(56%)和腺癌(62%)。治疗包括:nCT/nCRT (16/79, 20%);单纯手术(19/79,24%);dCRT (12/ 29,15 %);姑息性RT/CT (27/79, 34%);BSC(5/ 79,6 %)。新辅助治疗于10/16完成(63%)。在接受手术的35/79患者中,13/35(37%)发生主要并发症,3/35(9%)发生90天死亡率。1年和3年的总生存率(OS)分别为58%和19%。在接受nCT/nCRT治疗的患者中,这一比例分别为94%和46%。与非根治性治疗相比,治愈性治疗(nCT/nCRT/前期手术/dCRT)的1年和3年OS显著增加(76%/31% vs. 34%/3.3%)。多模式标准护理治疗在特定的80岁/ 90岁老人中是可行和安全的,并且可能与改善的OS相关。年龄本身不应影响治疗目的。
{"title":"Survival and perioperative outcomes of octo- and nonagenarians with resectable esophageal carcinoma.","authors":"Nabeel Ahmed, James Tankel, Jamil Asselah, Thierry Alcindor, Joanne Alfieri, Marc David, Sara Najmeh, Jonathan Spicer, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Carmen Mueller, Lorenzo Ferri","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad043","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The outcomes of different treatment modalities for patients aged 80 and above with locally advanced and resectable esophageal carcinoma are not well described. The aim of this study was to explore survival and perioperative outcomes among this specific group of patients. A retrospective, cohort analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained esophageal cancer database from the McGill regional upper gastroinestinal cancer network. Between 2010 and 2020, all patients ≥80 years with cT2-4a, Nany, M0 esophageal carcinoma were identified and stratified according to the treatment modality: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT); definitive CRT (dCRT); upfront surgery; palliative CT/RT; or best supportive care (BSC). Of the 162 patients identified, 79 were included in this study. The median age was 83 years (80-97), most were cT3 (73%), cN- (56%), and had adenocarcinoma (62%). Treatment included: nCT/nCRT (16/79, 20%); surgery alone (19/79, 24%); dCRT (12/29, 15%); palliative RT/CT (27/79, 34%); and BSC (5/79, 6%). Neoadjuvant treatment was completed in 10/16 (63%). Of the 35/79 who underwent surgery, major complications occurred in 13/35 (37%) and 90-day mortality in 3/35 (9%). Overall survival (OS) for the cohort at 1- and 3-years was 58% and 19%. Among patients treated with nCT/nCRT, this was 94% and 46% respectively. Curative intent treatment (nCT/nCRT/upfront surgery/dCRT) had significantly increased 1- and 3- year OS compared with non-curative treatment (76%/31% vs. 34%/3.3%). Multimodal standard of care treatment is feasible and safe in select octo/nonagenarians, and may be associated with improved OS. Age alone should not bias against treatment with curative intent.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10134931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with squamous dysplasia: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. 食管鳞状细胞癌在鳞状发育不良患者中的风险增加:荷兰的一项全国性队列研究
Laurelle van Tilburg, Manon C W Spaander, Marco J Bruno, Lindsey Oudijk, Lara R Heij, Michail Doukas, Arjun D Koch

Squamous dysplasia is the histological precursor of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The optimal management for distinct squamous dysplasia grades remains unclear because the corresponding risk of developing ESCC is unknown. We aimed to assess the ESCC risk in patients with esophageal squamous dysplasia in a Western country. This nationwide cohort study included all patients with esophageal squamous dysplasia, diagnosed between 1991 and 2020 in the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga). Squamous dysplasia was divided in mild-to-moderate dysplasia (mild, low-grade, and moderate dysplasia) and higher-grade dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia, severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ). ESCC were identified in Palga and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was diagnosis of prevalent (≤6 months) and incident (>6 months after squamous dysplasia) ESCC. In total, 873 patients (55% male, aged 68 years SD ± 13.2) were diagnosed with esophageal squamous dysplasia, comprising mild-to-moderate dysplasia (n = 456), higher-grade dysplasia (n = 393), and dysplasia not otherwise specified (n = 24). ESCC was diagnosed in 77 (17%) patients with mild-to-moderate dysplasia (49 prevalent, 28 incident ESCC) and in 162 (41%) patients with higher-grade dysplasia (128 prevalent, 34 incident ESCC). After excluding prevalent ESCC, the annual risk of ESCC was 4.0% (95% CI: 2.7-5.7%) in patients with mild-to-moderate dysplasia and 8.5% (95% CI: 5.9-11.7%) in patients with higher-grade dysplasia. All patients with squamous dysplasia, including those with mild-to-moderate dysplasia, have a substantial risk of developing ESCC. Consequently, endoscopic surveillance of the esophageal mucosa or endoscopic resection of dysplasia should be considered for patients with mild-to-moderate dysplasia in Western countries. KEY MESSAGES What is already known on this topic? Squamous dysplasia is the histological precursor of ESCC and is divided in distinct grades, based on the proportion of the squamous epithelium with histopathological abnormalities. In Western countries, the optimal management for distinct squamous dysplasia grades remains unclear because the corresponding risk of developing ESCC is unknown. What this study adds The ESCC risk of patients with squamous dysplasia was increased for all patients with squamous dysplasia in a Western country; 2.1% for patients with mild dysplasia, 5.1% for low-grade dysplasia, and 5.2% for moderate dysplasia. Increasing grades of squamous dysplasia were associated with an increased ESCC risk. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy We recommend that endoscopic follow-up or treatment should be considered in all patients with esophageal squamous dysplasia in Western countries: 1) for patients with mild, low-grade, and moderate dysplasia, endoscopic surveillance with careful inspection with narrow band imaging or dye-based chromoendoscopy of the esophageal mucosa is indicated; and 2) for patients with

鳞状异常增生是食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的组织学前兆。不同鳞状发育不良等级的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚,因为发生ESCC的相应风险尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估西方国家食管鳞状发育不良患者发生ESCC的风险。这项全国性队列研究包括1991年至2020年间在荷兰全国病理数据库(Palga)中诊断的所有食管鳞状发育不良患者。鳞状非典型增生分为轻至中度非典型增生(轻度、低度和中度非典型增生)和高级别非典型增生(高级别非典型增生、重度非典型增生、原位癌)。ESCC是在Palga和荷兰癌症登记处发现的。主要终点是ESCC的流行(≤6个月)和发生率(鳞状发育不良后>6个月)的诊断。共有873例患者(55%为男性,年龄68岁SD±13.2岁)被诊断为食管鳞状异常增生,包括轻至中度异常增生(n = 456),高级别异常增生(n = 393)和未特别说明的异常增生(n = 24)。77例(17%)轻中度发育不良患者(49例普遍存在,28例发生ESCC)和162例(41%)重度发育不良患者(128例普遍存在,34例发生ESCC)被诊断为ESCC。排除普遍存在的ESCC后,轻度至中度发育不良患者的ESCC年风险为4.0% (95% CI: 2.7-5.7%),高级别发育不良患者的ESCC年风险为8.5% (95% CI: 5.9-11.7%)。所有鳞状发育不良的患者,包括轻度至中度发育不良的患者,都有发生ESCC的巨大风险。因此,在西方国家,对于轻至中度发育不良的患者,应考虑内镜下食管黏膜监测或内镜下切除不典型增生。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?鳞状异常增生是ESCC的组织学前体,根据鳞状上皮与组织病理学异常的比例划分为不同的等级。在西方国家,对于不同鳞状发育不良等级的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚,因为发生ESCC的相应风险尚不清楚。在一个西方国家,所有的鳞状异常增生患者发生ESCC的风险都增加了;轻度发育不良占2.1%,低度发育不良占5.1%,中度发育不良占5.2%。鳞状发育不良等级的增加与ESCC风险的增加有关。我们建议在西方国家,所有食管鳞状异常增生患者都应考虑内镜随访或治疗:1)对于轻度、低度和中度食管鳞状异常增生患者,应进行内镜监测,并通过窄带成像或染色内镜对食管粘膜进行仔细检查;2)对于高度不典型增生、严重不典型增生和原位癌患者,应进行适当的内镜分期,如怀疑有肿瘤发生,应进行内镜治疗。
{"title":"Increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with squamous dysplasia: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.","authors":"Laurelle van Tilburg, Manon C W Spaander, Marco J Bruno, Lindsey Oudijk, Lara R Heij, Michail Doukas, Arjun D Koch","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad045","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Squamous dysplasia is the histological precursor of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The optimal management for distinct squamous dysplasia grades remains unclear because the corresponding risk of developing ESCC is unknown. We aimed to assess the ESCC risk in patients with esophageal squamous dysplasia in a Western country. This nationwide cohort study included all patients with esophageal squamous dysplasia, diagnosed between 1991 and 2020 in the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga). Squamous dysplasia was divided in mild-to-moderate dysplasia (mild, low-grade, and moderate dysplasia) and higher-grade dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia, severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ). ESCC were identified in Palga and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was diagnosis of prevalent (≤6 months) and incident (>6 months after squamous dysplasia) ESCC. In total, 873 patients (55% male, aged 68 years SD ± 13.2) were diagnosed with esophageal squamous dysplasia, comprising mild-to-moderate dysplasia (n = 456), higher-grade dysplasia (n = 393), and dysplasia not otherwise specified (n = 24). ESCC was diagnosed in 77 (17%) patients with mild-to-moderate dysplasia (49 prevalent, 28 incident ESCC) and in 162 (41%) patients with higher-grade dysplasia (128 prevalent, 34 incident ESCC). After excluding prevalent ESCC, the annual risk of ESCC was 4.0% (95% CI: 2.7-5.7%) in patients with mild-to-moderate dysplasia and 8.5% (95% CI: 5.9-11.7%) in patients with higher-grade dysplasia. All patients with squamous dysplasia, including those with mild-to-moderate dysplasia, have a substantial risk of developing ESCC. Consequently, endoscopic surveillance of the esophageal mucosa or endoscopic resection of dysplasia should be considered for patients with mild-to-moderate dysplasia in Western countries. KEY MESSAGES What is already known on this topic? Squamous dysplasia is the histological precursor of ESCC and is divided in distinct grades, based on the proportion of the squamous epithelium with histopathological abnormalities. In Western countries, the optimal management for distinct squamous dysplasia grades remains unclear because the corresponding risk of developing ESCC is unknown. What this study adds The ESCC risk of patients with squamous dysplasia was increased for all patients with squamous dysplasia in a Western country; 2.1% for patients with mild dysplasia, 5.1% for low-grade dysplasia, and 5.2% for moderate dysplasia. Increasing grades of squamous dysplasia were associated with an increased ESCC risk. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy We recommend that endoscopic follow-up or treatment should be considered in all patients with esophageal squamous dysplasia in Western countries: 1) for patients with mild, low-grade, and moderate dysplasia, endoscopic surveillance with careful inspection with narrow band imaging or dye-based chromoendoscopy of the esophageal mucosa is indicated; and 2) for patients with ","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691308/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9905408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Effect of intraoperative botulinum toxin injection on delayed gastric emptying and need for endoscopic pyloric intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. 术中注射肉毒杆菌毒素对食管切除术后胃排空延迟和内镜幽门介入治疗需求的影响:一项系统综述、荟萃分析和元回归分析。
Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Matthew McKenna, William Jones, Paul Healy, Jolene Witherspoon, Guy Blackshaw, Wyn Lewis, Antonio Foliaki, Tarig Abdelrahman

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative botulinum toxin (BT) injection on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and need for endoscopic pyloric intervention (NEPI) following esophagectomy. In compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards, a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of intraoperative BT injection in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was conducted. Proportion meta-analysis model was constructed to quantify the risk of the outcomes and direct comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes between BT injection and no BT injection or surgical pyloroplasty. Meta-regression was modeled to evaluate the effect of variations in different covariates among the individual studies on overall summary proportions. Nine studies enrolling 1070 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed that the risks of DGE and NEPI following intraoperative BT injection were 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-18.6%) and 15.2% (95% CI: 7.9-22.5%), respectively. There was no difference between BT injection and no BT injection in terms of DGE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.20-1.61, P = 0.29) and NEPI (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.42-7.12, P = 0.45). Moreover, BT injection was comparable to pyloroplasty in terms of DGE (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.35-2.08, P = 0.73) and NEPI (OR: 8.20, 95% CI: 0.63-105.90, P = 0.11). Meta-regression suggested that male gender was negatively associated with the risk of DGE (coefficient: -0.007, P = 0.003). In conclusion, level 2 evidence suggests that intraoperative BT injection may not improve the risk of DGE and NEPI in patients undergoing esophagectomy. The risk of DGE seems to be higher in females and in early postoperative period. High quality randomized controlled trials with robust statistical power are required for definite conclusions. The results of the current study can be used for hypothesis synthesis and power analysis in future prospective trials.

本研究的目的是评估术中注射肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)对延迟胃排空(DGE)的影响,以及食管切除术后内镜幽门介入治疗(NEPI)的必要性。根据系统评价的首选报告项目和Meta-Analyses陈述标准,对报告癌症食管切除术患者术中BT注射结果的研究进行了系统评价。构建比例荟萃分析模型以量化结果的风险,构建直接比较荟萃分析模型来比较BT注射和非BT注射或手术幽门成形术的结果。对元回归进行建模,以评估个体研究中不同协变量的变化对总体汇总比例的影响。9项研究纳入1070名患者。汇总分析显示,术中注射BT后发生DGE和NEPI的风险分别为13.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:7.9-18.6%)和15.2%(95%可信区间:7.9-22.5%)。在DGE方面,注射BT和不注射BT之间没有差异(比值比[OR]:0.57,95%CI:0.20-1.61,P = 0.29)和NEPI(OR:1.73,95%CI:0.42-7.12,P = 0.45)。此外,BT注射在DGE方面与幽门成形术相当(OR:0.85,95%CI:0.35-2.08,P = 0.73)和NEPI(OR:8.20,95%可信区间0.63-105.90,P = 0.11)。Meta回归表明,男性与DGE风险呈负相关(系数:-0.007,P = 0.003)。总之,2级证据表明,术中注射BT可能不会改善食管切除术患者患DGE和NEPI的风险。女性和术后早期发生DGE的风险似乎更高。需要具有强大统计能力的高质量随机对照试验才能得出明确的结论。当前研究的结果可用于未来前瞻性试验中的假设综合和功率分析。
{"title":"Effect of intraoperative botulinum toxin injection on delayed gastric emptying and need for endoscopic pyloric intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.","authors":"Shahab Hajibandeh,&nbsp;Shahin Hajibandeh,&nbsp;Matthew McKenna,&nbsp;William Jones,&nbsp;Paul Healy,&nbsp;Jolene Witherspoon,&nbsp;Guy Blackshaw,&nbsp;Wyn Lewis,&nbsp;Antonio Foliaki,&nbsp;Tarig Abdelrahman","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad053","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative botulinum toxin (BT) injection on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and need for endoscopic pyloric intervention (NEPI) following esophagectomy. In compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards, a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of intraoperative BT injection in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was conducted. Proportion meta-analysis model was constructed to quantify the risk of the outcomes and direct comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes between BT injection and no BT injection or surgical pyloroplasty. Meta-regression was modeled to evaluate the effect of variations in different covariates among the individual studies on overall summary proportions. Nine studies enrolling 1070 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed that the risks of DGE and NEPI following intraoperative BT injection were 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-18.6%) and 15.2% (95% CI: 7.9-22.5%), respectively. There was no difference between BT injection and no BT injection in terms of DGE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.20-1.61, P = 0.29) and NEPI (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.42-7.12, P = 0.45). Moreover, BT injection was comparable to pyloroplasty in terms of DGE (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.35-2.08, P = 0.73) and NEPI (OR: 8.20, 95% CI: 0.63-105.90, P = 0.11). Meta-regression suggested that male gender was negatively associated with the risk of DGE (coefficient: -0.007, P = 0.003). In conclusion, level 2 evidence suggests that intraoperative BT injection may not improve the risk of DGE and NEPI in patients undergoing esophagectomy. The risk of DGE seems to be higher in females and in early postoperative period. High quality randomized controlled trials with robust statistical power are required for definite conclusions. The results of the current study can be used for hypothesis synthesis and power analysis in future prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10291540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of frailty on hiatal hernia repair: a nationwide analysis of in-hospital clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes. 虚弱对裂孔疝修补术的影响:一项全国性的住院临床和医疗利用结果分析。
Y Lee, B Huo, T McKechnie, J Agzarian, D Hong

Previous studies recommend a watch-and-wait approach to paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair due to an increased risk for mortality. While contemporary studies suggest that elective surgery is safe and effective, many patients presenting with PEH are elderly. Therefore, we assessed the impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients receiving PEH repair. This retrospective population-based cohort study assessed patients from the National Inpatient Sample database who received PEH repair between October 2015 to December 2019. Demographic and perioperative data were gathered, and frailty was measured using the 11-item modified frailty index. The outcomes measured were in-hospital mortality, complications, discharge disposition, and healthcare utilization. Overall, 10,716 patients receiving PEH repair were identified, including 1442 frail patients. Frail patients were less often female and were more often in the lowest income quartile compared to robust patients. Frail patients were at greater odds for in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 2.83 (95% CI 1.65-4.83); P < 0.001], postoperative ICU admissions [OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.55-2.78); P < 0.001], any complications [OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.55-2.78); P < 0.001], hospital length of stay [mean difference (MD) 1.75 days (95% CI 1.30-2.210; P < 0.001], and total admission costs [MD $5631.65 (95% CI $3300.06-$7.963.24); P < 0.001] relative to their robust patients. While PEH repair in elderly patients is safe and effective, frail patients have an increased rate of in-hospital mortality, postoperative ICU admissions, complications, and total admission costs. Clinicians should consider patient frailty when identifying the most appropriate surgical candidates for PEH repair.

先前的研究建议采用观望的方法进行食管旁疝(PEH)修复,因为死亡风险增加。虽然当代研究表明选择性手术是安全有效的,但许多PEH患者都是老年人。因此,我们评估了在接受PEH修复的患者中,虚弱对住院结果和医疗利用率的影响。这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究评估了2015年10月至2019年12月期间接受PEH修复的国家住院患者样本数据库中的患者。收集人口统计学和围手术期数据,并使用11项改良虚弱指数测量虚弱程度。测量的结果包括住院死亡率、并发症、出院处置和医疗利用率。总的来说,10716名接受PEH修复的患者被确认,其中包括1442名虚弱的患者。与健壮的患者相比,虚弱的患者不太常见于女性,更常见于收入最低的四分之一人群。虚弱患者住院死亡率的几率更大[比值比(OR)2.83(95%CI 1.65-4.83);P
{"title":"Impact of frailty on hiatal hernia repair: a nationwide analysis of in-hospital clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes.","authors":"Y Lee,&nbsp;B Huo,&nbsp;T McKechnie,&nbsp;J Agzarian,&nbsp;D Hong","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad038","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies recommend a watch-and-wait approach to paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair due to an increased risk for mortality. While contemporary studies suggest that elective surgery is safe and effective, many patients presenting with PEH are elderly. Therefore, we assessed the impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients receiving PEH repair. This retrospective population-based cohort study assessed patients from the National Inpatient Sample database who received PEH repair between October 2015 to December 2019. Demographic and perioperative data were gathered, and frailty was measured using the 11-item modified frailty index. The outcomes measured were in-hospital mortality, complications, discharge disposition, and healthcare utilization. Overall, 10,716 patients receiving PEH repair were identified, including 1442 frail patients. Frail patients were less often female and were more often in the lowest income quartile compared to robust patients. Frail patients were at greater odds for in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 2.83 (95% CI 1.65-4.83); P < 0.001], postoperative ICU admissions [OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.55-2.78); P < 0.001], any complications [OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.55-2.78); P < 0.001], hospital length of stay [mean difference (MD) 1.75 days (95% CI 1.30-2.210; P < 0.001], and total admission costs [MD $5631.65 (95% CI $3300.06-$7.963.24); P < 0.001] relative to their robust patients. While PEH repair in elderly patients is safe and effective, frail patients have an increased rate of in-hospital mortality, postoperative ICU admissions, complications, and total admission costs. Clinicians should consider patient frailty when identifying the most appropriate surgical candidates for PEH repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9950870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities and access to thoracic surgeons among esophagectomy patients in the United States. 美国食管切除术患者的差异和获得胸外科医生的机会。
Christine E Alvarado, Stephanie G Worrell, Anuja L Sarode, Aria Bassiri, Boxiang Jiang, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe

Esophagectomy is a complex operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown that sub-specialization is associated with improved esophagectomy outcomes. We hypothesized that disparities would exist among esophagectomy patients regarding access to thoracic surgeons based on demographic, geographic, and hospital factors. The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify adult inpatients receiving esophagectomy for esophageal and gastric cardia cancer, Barrett's esophagus, and achalasia from 2015 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were categorized as receiving their esophagectomy from a thoracic versus non-thoracic provider. Survey methodology was used to correct for sampling error. Backwards selection from bivariable analysis was used in a survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors of esophagectomy provider specialization. During the study period, 960 patients met inclusion criteria representing an estimated population size of 3894 patients. Among them, 1696 (43.5%) were performed by a thoracic surgeon and 2199 (56.5%) were performed by non-thoracic providers. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with decreased likelihood of receiving care from a thoracic provider included Black (OR 0.41, p < 0.001), Other (OR 0.21, p < 0.001), and Unknown race (OR 0.22, p = 0.04), and uninsured patients (OR 0.53, p = 0.03). Urban hospital setting was associated with an increased likelihood of care by a thoracic provider (OR 4.43, p = 0.001). In this nationally representative study, Nonwhite race, rural hospital setting, and lower socioeconomic status were factors associated with decreased likelihood of esophagectomy patients receiving care from a thoracic surgeon. Efforts to address these disparities and provide appropriate access to thoracic surgeons is warranted.

食管切除术是一项复杂的手术,发病率和死亡率都很高。先前的研究表明,亚专业化与食管切除术结果的改善有关。我们假设,根据人口统计、地理和医院因素,食管切除术患者在接受胸外科医生治疗方面存在差异。Premier医疗保健数据库用于识别2015年至2019年使用ICD-10代码接受食管和贲门癌症、巴雷特食管和贲门失弛缓症食管切除术的成年住院患者。患者被分类为从胸腔和非胸腔提供者那里接受食管切除术。调查方法用于校正抽样误差。在调查加权多变量逻辑回归中,使用双变量分析的反向选择来确定食管切除术提供者专业化的预测因素。在研究期间,960名患者符合入选标准,估计人群规模为3894名患者。其中,1696例(43.5%)由胸部外科医生进行,2199例(56.5%)由非胸部提供者进行。在多变量分析中,与接受胸部护理的可能性降低相关的因素包括黑人(OR 0.41,p
{"title":"Disparities and access to thoracic surgeons among esophagectomy patients in the United States.","authors":"Christine E Alvarado,&nbsp;Stephanie G Worrell,&nbsp;Anuja L Sarode,&nbsp;Aria Bassiri,&nbsp;Boxiang Jiang,&nbsp;Philip A Linden,&nbsp;Christopher W Towe","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad025","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophagectomy is a complex operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown that sub-specialization is associated with improved esophagectomy outcomes. We hypothesized that disparities would exist among esophagectomy patients regarding access to thoracic surgeons based on demographic, geographic, and hospital factors. The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify adult inpatients receiving esophagectomy for esophageal and gastric cardia cancer, Barrett's esophagus, and achalasia from 2015 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were categorized as receiving their esophagectomy from a thoracic versus non-thoracic provider. Survey methodology was used to correct for sampling error. Backwards selection from bivariable analysis was used in a survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors of esophagectomy provider specialization. During the study period, 960 patients met inclusion criteria representing an estimated population size of 3894 patients. Among them, 1696 (43.5%) were performed by a thoracic surgeon and 2199 (56.5%) were performed by non-thoracic providers. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with decreased likelihood of receiving care from a thoracic provider included Black (OR 0.41, p < 0.001), Other (OR 0.21, p < 0.001), and Unknown race (OR 0.22, p = 0.04), and uninsured patients (OR 0.53, p = 0.03). Urban hospital setting was associated with an increased likelihood of care by a thoracic provider (OR 4.43, p = 0.001). In this nationally representative study, Nonwhite race, rural hospital setting, and lower socioeconomic status were factors associated with decreased likelihood of esophagectomy patients receiving care from a thoracic surgeon. Efforts to address these disparities and provide appropriate access to thoracic surgeons is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9442944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1