Diagnostic Cytopathology最新文献

{"title":"Commentary on “Benchtop fine needle aspirations: An untapped source of cytologic educational material”","authors":"Divyanshu Mohan Arya MBBS, Shruti Gupta MD, Gargi Kapatia MD, Niraj Kumari MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25362","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25362","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A six-year comprehensive review of eye cytology cases received at a tertiary level hospital","authors":"Courtney F. Connelly MD,&nbsp;Niyati Desai MD,&nbsp;Adela Cimic MD,&nbsp;Abel A. Gonzalez MD,&nbsp;Swikrity Upadhyay Baskota MBBS, MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25341","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25341","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ocular cytology is an effective method of diagnosing infective, benign, and malignant ocular disease processes due to easy accessibility and rapid turnaround time. However, these specimens pose significant diagnostic challenges due to rarity of the specimen type, sparse diagnostic material available for ancillary workup, and unfamiliarity of the diagnostic entities by the cytopathologist.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study conducted a 6-year comprehensive review of 65 eye cytology cases received at a tertiary level hospital. Cytopathologic diagnoses of “negative for malignancy” and “atypical” were categorized as negative findings (70.8%, <i>n</i> = 46) and diagnoses of “suspicious for malignancy” and “positive for malignancy” were categorized as positive findings (23.1%, <i>n</i> = 15). A 44.6% (<i>n</i> = 29) of cases had subsequent histopathology and/or flow cytometry diagnoses. Premalignant and malignant lesions detected on histopathology were considered as significant findings. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the concordance of ocular cytology with associated histopathology and/or flow cytometry diagnoses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The accuracy of final cytology-histopathology and/or cytology-flow cytometry diagnoses in this cohort of cases is 86.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of ocular diagnosis by cytology are 66.6% and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of ocular diagnosis by cytology are 100% and 80.9%, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ocular cytology is a fast, effective, and sensitive method for diagnosing ocular pathology specimens. Familiarity with these specimen types by cytopathologists can help in diagnosing ocular diseases effectively on small, challenging cytologic preparations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dc.25341","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141161234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of renal biopsy cytology","authors":"Hongzhi Xu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ian A. Taylor-Cho BA,&nbsp;Xiaoyin “Sara” Jiang MD,&nbsp;Wen-Chi Foo MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25357","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25357","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The role of fine needle biopsy cytology in the workup of renal mass lesions remains controversial. With advances in imaging technology and clinical management for renal masses, a critical reevaluation of the role of renal biopsy is needed. This study was designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of fine needle biopsy in patients with renal masses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A 5-year retrospective study of ultrasound or computer tomography (CT)-guided fine needle biopsies of renal masses diagnosed via cytopathology was conducted. Overall diagnostic rate, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Further analysis of the impact of fine needle biopsy cytology on clinical management was performed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 227 cases of fine-needle aspiration and/or biopsy (FNA/B) of renal masses were identified, including 76 with subsequent nephrectomies. Complications were rare (&lt;1%). The diagnostic rate and sensitivity of FNA/B were 83.3% and 89.5%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 98.7% at the major categorical level and 94.7% at the tumor subtype level. Subsequent clinical actions were associated with a definitive cytologic diagnosis of malignancy/neoplasia (<i>p</i> &lt; .05) and were affected by tumor subtype (<i>p</i> &lt; .05).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study demonstrates that FNA/B of renal masses is a safe and reliable minimally invasive diagnostic tool with excellent accuracy in confirmation of malignancy and subclassification of tumors. Diagnoses made on FNA/B play a key role in guiding a personalized clinical treatment plan.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141155227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TRPS1 function beyond breast: A retrospective immunohistochemical study on non-breast cytology specimens","authors":"Amr Ali MBBCH,&nbsp;Saroja Geetha MBBS,&nbsp;Dongling Wu MD,&nbsp;Karen Chau CT,&nbsp;Priyanka Karam MD,&nbsp;Seema Khutti MD,&nbsp;Silvat-Sheik Fayyaz MD,&nbsp;Kasturi Das MD,&nbsp;Cecilia Gimenez MD,&nbsp;Oana C. Rosca MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25359","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25359","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) has emerged as a reliable immunohistochemistry (IHC) marker for identifying breast origin in metastatic carcinomas. This study investigates the utility of TRPS1 IHC in non-breast cytology specimens.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective search of our pathology database for the year 2021 identified fluids (pleural and peritoneal) and liver, lung and bone fine needle aspirations (FNAs) with surgical follow-up confirming non-breast metastatic carcinomas. Cell blocks from cases with sufficient neoplastic cells underwent immunostaining using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against human TRPS1. Cases lacking tumor on deeper levels after the original work-up were excluded from the study. Two pathologists independently interpreted the TRPS1 staining.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 136 cases assessed, 31 (22.79%) exhibited positive TRPS1 staining, while 105 (77.21%) were nonreactive. Positivity rates were observed in tumors of Mullerian cell origin, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and lung origin at 28.85%, 25%, and 21.57%, respectively. Of the tumors of Mullerian cell origin 10 (66.67%) were serous carcinomas, 4 (26.67%) were endometrioid carcinomas, and one (6.67%) was a clear cell carcinoma. Lung tumors comprised seven (63.64%) squamous cell carcinomas and four (36.36%) adenocarcinomas, while the gastrointestinal tumors consisted of 14 (80%) adenocarcinomas and one (20%) squamous cell carcinoma.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although recognized as a sensitive marker for mammary carcinomas, TRPS1 immunostaining was also detected in Mullerian, lung, and GIT carcinomas. This highlights the significance of being cautious when depending solely on TRPS1 immunostaining to distinguish metastatic breast tumors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141097128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Verifying a novel bile cytology scoring system","authors":"Chie Hayakawa CT, IAC,&nbsp;Masahiro Hoshikawa MD,&nbsp;Johji Imura MD, FIAC,&nbsp;Takahiko Ueno PhD,&nbsp;Junki Koike MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25358","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25358","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The scoring system for bile cytology (SSBC) aims to improve bile cytology diagnostic accuracy. Here, the practicality of SSBC was verified by multiple cytotechnologists.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bile cytological specimens were evaluated by 24 cytotechnologists using SSBC. The samples were assessed before using the SSBC (first-time assessment) according to three categories: benign, indeterminate, and malignant. A first scoring evaluation (FSE) was then performed using SSBC; each item in the scoring system was classified as present or absent. After distributing an instruction sheet with diagnostic criteria, a second scoring evaluation (SSE) was performed using SSBC. Each method was evaluated using diagnostic accuracy and interobserver and intraobserver agreement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Several samples were assessed as indeterminate in the first-time assessment. Although the specificity of the SSE improved, the sensitivity and accuracy decreased compared with those of the FSE. The overall interobserver agreement was fair for all parameters, including abnormal chromatin, irregular internuclear distances, irregularly overlapped nuclei, irregular cluster margins, and final evaluation in the FSE and SSE. The final evaluation by histological type exhibited slight agreement for well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma and almost perfect agreement for poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in the FSE and SSE. For moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, agreement was moderate in the FSE and fair in the SSE. For cholangitis, a slight agreement was observed in the FSE, which improved to fair in the SSE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although the SSBC is expected to improve specificity, there exists ambiguity regarding SSBC criteria and interindividual assessment differences. Therefore, the objective assessment method should be revised.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141086596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Special issue: “A case of…”","authors":"Poonam Vohra MD,&nbsp;Swikrity Baskota MD,&nbsp;Zubair Baloch MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25356","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25356","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141081102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Education and diversity in cytopathology: Past, present, and future","authors":"Valerie A. Fitzhugh MD,&nbsp;Jordan P. Reynolds MD,&nbsp;Melina Flanagan MD, MSPH,&nbsp;Ronald Balassanian MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25342","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25342","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion is a powerful goal which many of us strive toward in medicine, both in patient care and administrative leadership. As the world evolves, the practice of medicine must evolve with it. We are cognizant of the importance of the history of our medical specialties. If we do not acknowledge all parts of our history, we are doomed to repeat it. This special issue is unique and unlike anything that has previously been published in Diagnostic Cytopathology. This issue looks at some of the history of cytopathology. This historical review is followed by some of the present state of cytopathology. There are insights into global cytopathology. The final portion of this issue examines the critical need for cytotechnology schools in the United States. All of these areas are critical to the past, present, and future of cytopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140956407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Commentary on “Fusion of old and new: Employing touch imprint slides for next-generation sequencing in solid tumors”","authors":"Archit Goel MBBS,&nbsp;Gargi Kapatia MD, DNB, PDCC,&nbsp;Brijdeep Singh MD, PDCC,&nbsp;Vandana Sharma MS","doi":"10.1002/dc.25355","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25355","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140910867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"World Health Organization Reporting System for Soft Tissue Cytopathology: Risk of malignancy and reproducibility of categories among observers","authors":"Lester J. Layfield MD,&nbsp;Leslie Dodd MD,&nbsp;Magda Esebua MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25340","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25340","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) is scheduled to publish the WHO Reporting System for Soft Tissue Cytopathology (WHORSSTC). This system establishes categories with well-defined definitions, criteria, and estimated risks of malignancy (ROMs) for soft tissue tumors. The estimates of ROM are based on a relatively small number of published studies. Interobserver reproducibility is not addressed in the reporting system even though reproducibility of a reporting system is highly important.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A manual search of one authors personal consultation files and teaching set (L.J.L.) was conducted for all cytologic specimens of soft tissue tumors accessioned between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2022. Only cases with documented surgical pathology follow-up were included in the study. Slides from each case were evaluated independently by three cytopathologists with each case assigned to one of the WHORSSTC categories. A ROM for each of the WHORSSTC categories was calculated. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by the kappa and weighted kappa statistics.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Risk for malignancy by category were: Category 1: 0%, Category 2: 28%, Category 3: 57%, Category 4: 47%, Category 5: 63%, and Category 6: 88%. Kappa statistics for agreement between raters varied from 0.2183 to 0.3465 and weighted kappa varied from 0.3778 to 0.5217.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The WHORSSTC showed a progression of malignancy risk from the category “benign” (28%) to the category “malignant” (88%). Interobserver agreement was only fair.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140908564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fine needle aspiration diagnosis of benign oncocytic lesions of the head and neck associated with false positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography scan","authors":"Mahreen Hussain MD,&nbsp;Hafiz Ghani MD,&nbsp;Yasir Ali MD,&nbsp;Cecilia Clement MD,&nbsp;Ranjana Nawgiri MD","doi":"10.1002/dc.25331","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dc.25331","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become the mainstay for staging and post-therapy surveillance of cancer as malignant neoplasms generally demonstrate higher FDG uptake that benign entities. However, there are certain benign lesions, most notably oncocytic tumors, that can display very high uptake and fine needle aspiration (FNA) is usually done to confirm malignancy. Therefore, it is important to recognize that benign oncocytic lesions of the head and neck may also present as FDG-avid lesions to avoid a diagnostic pitfall.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Electronic search of institutional surgical and cytopathology archives was conducted to identify cases of benign oncocytic lesions involving the head and neck region diagnosed by FNA from January 2012 to April 2022. Chart review was used to assess whether lesions were initially discovered via PET scanning.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One hundred and twenty-five cases of oncocytic lesions were identified; 12 (9%) PET positive lesions were identified in the head and neck region from patients being evaluated for metastasis or for suspicion of malignancy. Cytopathology of all 12 cases demonstrated benign oncocytic lesions; eight (67%) of these cases were consistent with Warthin tumor, one (8.3%) was a benign oncocytic lesion, and one (8.3%) was consistent wit a parathyroid adenoma. Most (58%) of the PET-positive lesions were in parotid region, two from thyroid gland (17%), one from submandibular gland (8%), one from paratracheal area (8%). The PET scan SUVs ranged from 3.3 to 19.5 g mL⁻¹.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Oncocytic lesions including Warthin tumors can result in false-positive FDG uptake on PET scans. Clinicians and cytopathologists should be aware of PET-positive benign oncocytic head and neck lesions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}