首页 > 最新文献

Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Adverse Effects Following Immunisation and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Qualitative Study in a South Indian District. 免疫和疫苗犹豫后的不良反应:南印度地区的一项定性研究。
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S515064
Retheesh Babu Gopalan, Bontha V Babu, Krishna Sarma S, Rooth P John

Background: Parental perceptions and concerns about vaccine safety and 'adverse effects following immunisation' (AEFI) are the reasons for vaccine hesitancy. This study aimed to understand how these vaccine-related concerns have become significant determinants of vaccine decision-making among non-vaccinating parents in the Alappuzha district of Kerala, India. The healthcare providers' views in this regard are also reported.

Methods: This is a qualitative study. In-depth interviews were conducted with informants from 110 households having non-immunised/partly-immunised children. In addition, 18 healthcare providers were interviewed. Thematic analysis using the reflective thematic method was carried out.

Results: Parents reported incidences of minor events of AEFI and are hesitant to continue vaccination in circumstances when children need medical treatment. AEFI incidents within the family have seriously hampered the trust in vaccines. Parents have concerns about multiple vaccinations and have misconceptions about the content of vaccines. Other concerns that lead to hesitancy are vaccine-related infertility, polio infection after polio vaccination and autism due to vaccination. Healthcare providers reported that there were no serious incidents that needed hospitalisation. Health workers opined that informing parents about AEFIs and preparing them is better.

Conclusion: The study reported that AEFIs are a barrier to vaccine acceptance. It warrants the need to build trust in vaccines and the vaccination process. Transparent communication with the beneficiaries is crucial. AEFI monitoring and reporting should be an essential component of efforts to minimise vaccination hesitancy.

背景:父母对疫苗安全性和“免疫后不良反应”(AEFI)的认知和担忧是疫苗犹豫的原因。这项研究旨在了解这些与疫苗相关的担忧如何成为印度喀拉拉邦Alappuzha地区未接种疫苗的父母接种疫苗决策的重要决定因素。还报告了保健提供者在这方面的意见。方法:定性研究。对来自110个未接种/部分接种儿童家庭的举举人进行了深入访谈。此外,还采访了18名医疗保健提供者。采用反思性专题分析方法进行专题分析。结果:父母报告了AEFI的轻微事件发生率,并且在儿童需要医疗的情况下不愿继续接种疫苗。家庭内的急性呼吸道感染事件严重阻碍了对疫苗的信任。家长对多次接种疫苗有顾虑,对疫苗的内容有误解。导致犹豫的其他问题是与疫苗有关的不孕症、脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种后的脊髓灰质炎感染和疫苗接种引起的自闭症。医疗保健提供者报告说,没有发生需要住院治疗的严重事件。卫生工作者认为,让家长了解aefi并做好准备是更好的做法。结论:该研究报告了aefi是疫苗接受的障碍。这证明有必要建立对疫苗和疫苗接种过程的信任。与受益人的透明沟通至关重要。AEFI监测和报告应是尽量减少疫苗接种犹豫的一个重要组成部分。
{"title":"Adverse Effects Following Immunisation and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Qualitative Study in a South Indian District.","authors":"Retheesh Babu Gopalan, Bontha V Babu, Krishna Sarma S, Rooth P John","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S515064","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S515064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parental perceptions and concerns about vaccine safety and 'adverse effects following immunisation' (AEFI) are the reasons for vaccine hesitancy. This study aimed to understand how these vaccine-related concerns have become significant determinants of vaccine decision-making among non-vaccinating parents in the Alappuzha district of Kerala, India. The healthcare providers' views in this regard are also reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study. In-depth interviews were conducted with informants from 110 households having non-immunised/partly-immunised children. In addition, 18 healthcare providers were interviewed. Thematic analysis using the reflective thematic method was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents reported incidences of minor events of AEFI and are hesitant to continue vaccination in circumstances when children need medical treatment. AEFI incidents within the family have seriously hampered the trust in vaccines. Parents have concerns about multiple vaccinations and have misconceptions about the content of vaccines. Other concerns that lead to hesitancy are vaccine-related infertility, polio infection after polio vaccination and autism due to vaccination. Healthcare providers reported that there were no serious incidents that needed hospitalisation. Health workers opined that informing parents about AEFIs and preparing them is better.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reported that AEFIs are a barrier to vaccine acceptance. It warrants the need to build trust in vaccines and the vaccination process. Transparent communication with the beneficiaries is crucial. AEFI monitoring and reporting should be an essential component of efforts to minimise vaccination hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"145-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144474289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Diagnostic and Patient Safety in Healthcare Systems: Key Insights from the World Patient Safety Day 2024 Commemoration in Uganda. 加强医疗保健系统的诊断和患者安全:来自乌干达2024年世界患者安全日纪念活动的重要见解。
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S520743
Munanura Turyasiima, Prima Maria Niwampeire, Martin Ssendyona, Balbina Gillian Akot, Miriam Acheng, Simon Peter Katongole, Joseph Okware, Juliet Tumwikirize, Kenneth Mutesasira, Joshua Atepo, Robinah Kaitiritimba, Joshua Epuitai, Benson Tuhwezeine Tumwesigye, Gaston Turinawe, Robert Mutumba, Martin Ndifuna, Geofrey Musinguzi, Denise Asaba Kemigisa

Background: The 4th World Patient Safety Day (WPSD) 2024 commemoration in Uganda, themed "Improving Diagnosis for Patient Safety", highlighted critical challenges and opportunities in reducing diagnostic errors within healthcare systems. This review synthesizes key insights from the event, focusing on factors contributing to diagnostic inaccuracies, systemic gaps, and actionable strategies for improvement.

Methods: Using a qualitative synthesis approach guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ), we analyzed data from a hybrid webinar (210 participants) and a four-day medical camp (600+ patients served). Thematic analysis identified four key areas: (i) factors influencing diagnostic errors, (ii) the role of laboratory and imaging services in diagnosis error prevention, (iii) existing health system interventions, and (iv) patient empowerment in the diagnostic process.

Results: Diagnostic errors in Uganda stem from cognitive biases, systemic inefficiencies (eg, understaffing, inadequate equipment), and financial barriers in private healthcare. Strengthening laboratory capacity, digitizing health records, and enhancing provider-patient communication emerged as pivotal solutions. The Ministry of Health's initiatives such as laboratory accreditation, the 5S quality improvement framework, and patient feedback mechanisms demonstrate progress but require scaling.

Recommendations: We propose a multi-level approach: (1) national policies for error reporting and patient safety frameworks, (2) expanded supportive supervision and digitization (eg, EHRs with decision support), (3) stricter regulation of private healthcare, and (4) community engagement to improve health literacy and early care-seeking.

Conclusion: Reducing diagnostic errors demands systemic reforms, technological integration, and collaborative stakeholder engagement. Uganda's WPSD 2024 insights offer a model for similar low-resource settings to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.

背景:第四届世界患者安全日(WPSD) 2024年纪念活动在乌干达举行,主题为“改善诊断,促进患者安全”,强调了减少医疗保健系统诊断错误方面的重大挑战和机遇。本综述综合了该事件的关键见解,重点关注导致诊断不准确的因素、系统差距和可操作的改进策略。方法:采用以定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)为指导的定性综合方法,我们分析了来自混合网络研讨会(210名参与者)和为期四天的医疗营(服务了600多名患者)的数据。专题分析确定了四个关键领域:(i)影响诊断错误的因素;(ii)实验室和成像服务在预防诊断错误方面的作用;(iii)现有卫生系统干预措施;(iv)在诊断过程中赋予患者权力。结果:乌干达的诊断错误源于认知偏差、系统性效率低下(如人员不足、设备不足)和私营医疗机构的财务障碍。加强实验室能力、数字化健康记录和加强医患沟通成为关键的解决方案。卫生部的实验室认证、5S质量改进框架和患者反馈机制等举措显示出进展,但需要扩大规模。建议:我们提出了一个多层次的方法:(1)国家错误报告政策和患者安全框架;(2)扩大支持性监管和数字化(例如,带有决策支持的电子病历);(3)对私营医疗机构进行更严格的监管;(4)社区参与,以提高健康素养和早期求医。结论:减少诊断错误需要系统改革、技术整合和利益相关者的协作参与。乌干达的WPSD 2024洞察为类似的低资源环境提供了一个模型,以提高诊断准确性和患者安全性。
{"title":"Enhancing Diagnostic and Patient Safety in Healthcare Systems: Key Insights from the World Patient Safety Day 2024 Commemoration in Uganda.","authors":"Munanura Turyasiima, Prima Maria Niwampeire, Martin Ssendyona, Balbina Gillian Akot, Miriam Acheng, Simon Peter Katongole, Joseph Okware, Juliet Tumwikirize, Kenneth Mutesasira, Joshua Atepo, Robinah Kaitiritimba, Joshua Epuitai, Benson Tuhwezeine Tumwesigye, Gaston Turinawe, Robert Mutumba, Martin Ndifuna, Geofrey Musinguzi, Denise Asaba Kemigisa","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S520743","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S520743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 4th World Patient Safety Day (WPSD) 2024 commemoration in Uganda, themed \"Improving Diagnosis for Patient Safety\", highlighted critical challenges and opportunities in reducing diagnostic errors within healthcare systems. This review synthesizes key insights from the event, focusing on factors contributing to diagnostic inaccuracies, systemic gaps, and actionable strategies for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative synthesis approach guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ), we analyzed data from a hybrid webinar (210 participants) and a four-day medical camp (600+ patients served). Thematic analysis identified four key areas: (i) factors influencing diagnostic errors, (ii) the role of laboratory and imaging services in diagnosis error prevention, (iii) existing health system interventions, and (iv) patient empowerment in the diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic errors in Uganda stem from cognitive biases, systemic inefficiencies (eg, understaffing, inadequate equipment), and financial barriers in private healthcare. Strengthening laboratory capacity, digitizing health records, and enhancing provider-patient communication emerged as pivotal solutions. The Ministry of Health's initiatives such as laboratory accreditation, the 5S quality improvement framework, and patient feedback mechanisms demonstrate progress but require scaling.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>We propose a multi-level approach: (1) national policies for error reporting and patient safety frameworks, (2) expanded supportive supervision and digitization (eg, EHRs with decision support), (3) stricter regulation of private healthcare, and (4) community engagement to improve health literacy and early care-seeking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reducing diagnostic errors demands systemic reforms, technological integration, and collaborative stakeholder engagement. Uganda's WPSD 2024 insights offer a model for similar low-resource settings to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144093079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Out-of-Pocket Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. 比较2型糖尿病患者钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的自付费用和健康相关生活质量
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S496619
Sisi Hu, Preeti Pushpalata Zanwar, Tara Jenkins, Rajkumar J Sevak, Bhaskara R Jasti

Purpose: To compare the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2 inhibitor), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), with or without metformin, on out of pocket and total prescription expenditure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Patients and methods: This observational study utilized 2017-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from patients with T2DM (≥18 years) on SGLT2 inhibitor, GLP-1 RA, with or without metformin, from payer and self-perspective. HRQoL was assessed using physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores based on Veterans Rand 12. This study estimated survey-weighed out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for prescription refills and total prescription expenditures. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias and health expenditures, and HRQoL were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. P-value thresholds were recalculated using Bonferroni adjustment (Total prescription expenditure or OOP, PCS, and MCS: p=0.017).

Results: Patients on GLP-1 RA alone had significantly higher OOP costs than those on SGLT2 inhibitor alone (median: $166.50 vs $81.00, p<0.01). No significant difference existed between the two treatments for total prescription expenditures (median: $9831.53vs. $9458.80, p=0.059), MCS (median:52.41 vs 53.48, p=0.40), or PCS (median: 45.22 vs 44.54, p=0.19). Patients on metformin with GLP-1 RA had higher OOP costs compared to those on SGLT2 inhibitor with metformin (median: $140.40 vs $107.33, p <0.01). There is a significant difference between the combination treatments for total prescription expenditure (median: $9453.96 vs $6711.47, p<0.01), MCS (median: 54.19 vs 54.30, p=0.70), or PCS (median: 45.69 vs 46.08, p=0.55).

Conclusion: Even though patients on GLP-1 RA have higher OOP costs, the difference in PCS or MCS scores between GLP-1 RA and SGLT2 inhibitor was not significant. Further investigation is needed to study the long-term impact on HRQoL and clinical outcomes.

目的:比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2抑制剂)、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)加用或不加用二甲双胍对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者自付费用和总处方支出以及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。患者和方法:本观察性研究利用2017-2021年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)数据,这些数据来自使用SGLT2抑制剂GLP-1 RA的T2DM患者(≥18岁),有或没有二甲双胍,从付款人和自我的角度。HRQoL采用基于Veterans Rand 12的身体(PCS)和精神成分总结(MCS)评分进行评估。本研究估计了调查称重自付(OOP)费用的处方重新填写和总处方支出。采用倾向得分匹配减轻选择偏差和卫生支出,HRQoL采用Mann-Whitney u检验进行比较。使用Bonferroni调整重新计算p值阈值(总处方支出或OOP、PCS和MCS: p=0.017)。结果:单独使用GLP-1 RA的患者的OOP成本明显高于单独使用SGLT2抑制剂的患者(中位数:166.50美元vs 81.00美元)。结论:尽管GLP-1 RA患者的OOP成本更高,但GLP-1 RA和SGLT2抑制剂之间的PCS或MCS评分差异不显著。需要进一步研究对HRQoL和临床结果的长期影响。
{"title":"Comparing Out-of-Pocket Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Sisi Hu, Preeti Pushpalata Zanwar, Tara Jenkins, Rajkumar J Sevak, Bhaskara R Jasti","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S496619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S496619","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2 inhibitor), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), with or without metformin, on out of pocket and total prescription expenditure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This observational study utilized 2017-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from patients with T2DM (≥18 years) on SGLT2 inhibitor, GLP-1 RA, with or without metformin, from payer and self-perspective. HRQoL was assessed using physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores based on Veterans Rand 12. This study estimated survey-weighed out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for prescription refills and total prescription expenditures. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias and health expenditures, and HRQoL were compared using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test. P-value thresholds were recalculated using Bonferroni adjustment (Total prescription expenditure or OOP, PCS, and MCS: p=0.017).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients on GLP-1 RA alone had significantly higher OOP costs than those on SGLT2 inhibitor alone (median: $166.50 vs $81.00, p<0.01). No significant difference existed between the two treatments for total prescription expenditures (median: $9831.53vs. $9458.80, p=0.059), MCS (median:52.41 vs 53.48, p=0.40), or PCS (median: 45.22 vs 44.54, p=0.19). Patients on metformin with GLP-1 RA had higher OOP costs compared to those on SGLT2 inhibitor with metformin (median: $140.40 vs $107.33, p <0.01). There is a significant difference between the combination treatments for total prescription expenditure (median: $9453.96 vs $6711.47, p<0.01), MCS (median: 54.19 vs 54.30, p=0.70), or PCS (median: 45.69 vs 46.08, p=0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though patients on GLP-1 RA have higher OOP costs, the difference in PCS or MCS scores between GLP-1 RA and SGLT2 inhibitor was not significant. Further investigation is needed to study the long-term impact on HRQoL and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"121-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143972585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fulminant Red Yeast Rice-Associated Rhabdomyolysis with Acute Liver Injury and Hyperkalemia Treated with Extracorporeal Blood Purification Using CytoSorb. 使用CytoSorb体外血液净化治疗暴发性红曲米相关横纹肌溶解伴急性肝损伤和高钾血症。
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S519861
Marko Kurnik, Tilen Markelj, Borut Žgavc, Barbara Hudournik, Marija Meznarič, Matej Podbregar

Rhabdomyolysis is a pathophysiological process characterized by the destruction of muscle cells and the release of intracellular contents into the systemic circulation, which can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) and failure. Causes are classified mainly as traumatic and non-traumatic, with statin-induced rhabdomyolysis being widely recognized. Other causes are seldomly reported, one being red yeast rice (RYR) or its active ingredient, monacolin K. We present a life-threatening case of fulminant rhabdomyolysis with severe hyperkalemia, accompanied by ECG changes, tetraparesis, impending compartment syndrome, and liver injury requiring intensive care treatment. Prompt renal replacement therapy was commenced, initially for the treatment of hyperkalemia and subsequently for myoglobin adsorption using the CytoSorb membrane. High doses of corticosteroids were administered as the trigger factor was initially unknown. The condition gradually improved, and the patient regained full functionality. The diagnosis of toxic rhabdomyolysis was confirmed only after the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit. An over-the-counter supplement containing red yeast rice (RYR) was identified as the sole possible triggering factor, with symptoms occurring two days after beginning the self-treatment.

横纹肌溶解是一种病理生理过程,其特征是肌肉细胞被破坏,细胞内内容物释放到体循环中,可导致急性肾损伤(AKI)和衰竭。病因主要分为创伤性和非创伤性,其中他汀类药物引起的横纹肌溶解已被广泛认可。其他原因很少报道,一个是红曲米(RYR)或其活性成分莫那可林k。我们提出了一个危及生命的病例,暴发性横纹肌溶解伴严重高钾血症,伴有心电图改变,四肢瘫痪,临近室综合征,肝损伤需要重症监护治疗。立即开始肾脏替代治疗,最初用于治疗高钾血症,随后使用CytoSorb膜吸附肌红蛋白。高剂量的皮质类固醇被施用,因为触发因素最初是未知的。病情逐渐好转,患者恢复了全部功能。中毒性横纹肌溶解的诊断仅在患者从重症监护病房出院后才得到确认。一种含有红曲米(RYR)的非处方补充剂被确定为唯一可能的触发因素,在开始自我治疗两天后出现症状。
{"title":"Fulminant Red Yeast Rice-Associated Rhabdomyolysis with Acute Liver Injury and Hyperkalemia Treated with Extracorporeal Blood Purification Using CytoSorb.","authors":"Marko Kurnik, Tilen Markelj, Borut Žgavc, Barbara Hudournik, Marija Meznarič, Matej Podbregar","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S519861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S519861","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rhabdomyolysis is a pathophysiological process characterized by the destruction of muscle cells and the release of intracellular contents into the systemic circulation, which can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) and failure. Causes are classified mainly as traumatic and non-traumatic, with statin-induced rhabdomyolysis being widely recognized. Other causes are seldomly reported, one being red yeast rice (RYR) or its active ingredient, monacolin K. We present a life-threatening case of fulminant rhabdomyolysis with severe hyperkalemia, accompanied by ECG changes, tetraparesis, impending compartment syndrome, and liver injury requiring intensive care treatment. Prompt renal replacement therapy was commenced, initially for the treatment of hyperkalemia and subsequently for myoglobin adsorption using the CytoSorb membrane. High doses of corticosteroids were administered as the trigger factor was initially unknown. The condition gradually improved, and the patient regained full functionality. The diagnosis of toxic rhabdomyolysis was confirmed only after the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit. An over-the-counter supplement containing red yeast rice (RYR) was identified as the sole possible triggering factor, with symptoms occurring two days after beginning the self-treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"109-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143983865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expert Consensus on Vitamin B6 Therapeutic Use for Patients: Guidance on Safe Dosage, Duration and Clinical Management. 维生素B6患者治疗使用专家共识:安全剂量、持续时间和临床管理指南。
IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S499941
Natalie Schellack, Kitiyot Yotsombut, Arman Sabet, Jalal Nafach, Fu Liong Hiew, Kongkiat Kulkantrakorn

Purpose: Vitamin B6 is a crucial water-soluble vitamin found in many foods and is involved in numerous physiological processes, including neurotransmitter synthesis and nervous system function. Although essential for overall health, both deficiency and excessive intake of vitamin B6 may lead to health complications, particularly peripheral neuropathy. This consensus statement aims to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the safe and effective use of vitamin B6, focusing on its benefits, risks, recommended dosages, and treatment course.

Methods: This consensus statement was developed using a Delphi approach involving a panel of six experts from various medical specialties. This process includes a comprehensive literature review, two rounds of anonymous online surveys, and a virtual expert roundtable discussion. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence for each recommendation.

Results: The expert panel reached consensus on five key statements. These key recommendations encompass the function of vitamin B6, complications due to vitamin B6 deficiency, dosage recommendations, adverse events, and monitoring guidance throughout the course of treatment. A washout period of 20-40 days for the complete clearance of vitamin B6 was calculated based on pharmacokinetic parameters. A clinical pathway for managing patients who might benefit from vitamin B6 treatment was proposed.

Conclusion: This consensus statement highlights the importance of recognizing the benefits and potential risks of vitamin B6. While the therapeutic dosage of vitamin B6 can be beneficial to treat deficiency, excessive intake can lead to adverse effects. This statement emphasizes the need for individualized patient care considering factors such as medical history, lifestyle, and potential drug interactions. Further research is needed to establish clearer dosage guidelines, understand the mechanisms of vitamin B6-induced neurological side effects, and optimize patient outcomes.

目的:维生素B6是一种重要的水溶性维生素,存在于许多食物中,参与许多生理过程,包括神经递质合成和神经系统功能。尽管维生素B6对整体健康至关重要,但缺乏和过量摄入维生素B6都可能导致健康并发症,尤其是周围神经病变。这一共识声明旨在为医疗保健专业人员提供安全有效使用维生素B6的明确指导,重点是它的益处、风险、推荐剂量和治疗过程。方法:采用德尔菲法,由来自不同医学专业的六名专家组成的小组,制定了这一共识声明。这一过程包括全面的文献综述、两轮匿名在线调查和一次虚拟专家圆桌讨论。GRADE方法用于评估每项建议的证据质量。结果:专家组就5项关键声明达成共识。这些关键建议包括维生素B6的功能、维生素B6缺乏引起的并发症、剂量建议、不良事件以及整个治疗过程中的监测指导。根据药代动力学参数计算维生素B6完全清除的洗脱期为20-40天。提出了一种管理可能受益于维生素B6治疗的患者的临床途径。结论:这一共识强调了认识到维生素B6的益处和潜在风险的重要性。虽然治疗剂量的维生素B6对治疗缺乏症是有益的,但过量摄入会导致不良反应。这种说法强调需要考虑到诸如病史、生活方式和潜在的药物相互作用等因素的个体化患者护理。需要进一步的研究来建立更清晰的剂量指南,了解维生素b6诱导的神经系统副作用的机制,并优化患者的预后。
{"title":"Expert Consensus on Vitamin B6 Therapeutic Use for Patients: Guidance on Safe Dosage, Duration and Clinical Management.","authors":"Natalie Schellack, Kitiyot Yotsombut, Arman Sabet, Jalal Nafach, Fu Liong Hiew, Kongkiat Kulkantrakorn","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S499941","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S499941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vitamin B6 is a crucial water-soluble vitamin found in many foods and is involved in numerous physiological processes, including neurotransmitter synthesis and nervous system function. Although essential for overall health, both deficiency and excessive intake of vitamin B6 may lead to health complications, particularly peripheral neuropathy. This consensus statement aims to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the safe and effective use of vitamin B6, focusing on its benefits, risks, recommended dosages, and treatment course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This consensus statement was developed using a Delphi approach involving a panel of six experts from various medical specialties. This process includes a comprehensive literature review, two rounds of anonymous online surveys, and a virtual expert roundtable discussion. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence for each recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel reached consensus on five key statements. These key recommendations encompass the function of vitamin B6, complications due to vitamin B6 deficiency, dosage recommendations, adverse events, and monitoring guidance throughout the course of treatment. A washout period of 20-40 days for the complete clearance of vitamin B6 was calculated based on pharmacokinetic parameters. A clinical pathway for managing patients who might benefit from vitamin B6 treatment was proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus statement highlights the importance of recognizing the benefits and potential risks of vitamin B6. While the therapeutic dosage of vitamin B6 can be beneficial to treat deficiency, excessive intake can lead to adverse effects. This statement emphasizes the need for individualized patient care considering factors such as medical history, lifestyle, and potential drug interactions. Further research is needed to establish clearer dosage guidelines, understand the mechanisms of vitamin B6-induced neurological side effects, and optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"97-108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) Programs and Strategies in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review. 沙特阿拉伯药品质量使用(QUM)项目和策略的有效性:叙述性回顾。
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S503383
Fahad Aldhafeeri, Andrew Wilson, Shaun Larkin, Faisal Murayh Aldhafeeri

Background: The high prevalence of chronic diseases, workforce challenges, and growing polypharmacy adversely impact the quality use of medicines (QUM) and health outcomes in Saudi Arabia (SA). The SA Ministry of Health (MOH) has initiated several programs and policies to enhance QUM including a National Medication Safety Program, national clinical guidelines, and technology-based strategies.

Objective: To assess the published literature on the range, quality, and effectiveness of QUM methods in the SA health system.

Methods: Comprehensive search of electronic databases Scopus, Medline, and PubMed for papers reporting evaluation of QUM interventions or programs in SA.

Results: QUM programs involving medication reconciliation, interventions by hospital pharmacists, antibiotics stewardship, technology and staff training are the most commonly used programs reported in SA. Evaluations of several QUM interventions found a significant positive impact on health outcomes, prescribing patterns, chronic disease management, medication safety, and healthcare costs. Medication reconciliation programs reduced discrepancies by up to 20% in some studies. Hospital pharmacist interventions showed high acceptance rates (up to 92%) and improved medication safety. Antibiotic stewardship programs effectively reduced antimicrobial use and costs. Health information technology implementations like electronic health records (EHR), and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) showed mixed results but generally improved medication safety and efficiency. Staff training initiatives enhanced healthcare professionals' knowledge and skills in medication management.

Conclusion: While SA has national QUM policies and programs, and evidence that individual QUM interventions have significant positive local impact, more large-scale, multi-center studies are needed to provide a comprehensive view of QUM practices. More rigorous evaluations of existing programs and expansion of the range of QUM programs to align with international ones could further improve medication safety and patient outcomes in Saudi Arabia.

背景:在沙特阿拉伯(SA),慢性疾病的高患病率、劳动力挑战和日益增长的多种用药对药物的质量使用(QUM)和健康结果产生了不利影响。南非卫生部启动了若干方案和政策,以加强全国药品管理,包括国家药品安全方案、国家临床指南和基于技术的战略。目的:评价已发表的关于南澳卫生系统质量管理方法的范围、质量和有效性的文献。方法:综合检索电子数据库Scopus、Medline和PubMed,检索有关南澳QUM干预措施或项目评估的论文。结果:综合管理方案包括药物和解、医院药师干预、抗生素管理、技术和员工培训是南澳最常用的方案。对一些QUM干预措施的评估发现,对健康结果、处方模式、慢性病管理、药物安全性和医疗保健成本产生了显著的积极影响。在一些研究中,药物调解项目减少了高达20%的差异。医院药师干预的接受率高(高达92%),用药安全性提高。抗生素管理方案有效地减少了抗菌药物的使用和成本。健康信息技术的实现,如电子健康记录(EHR)和计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE),结果喜忧参半,但总体上提高了用药安全性和效率。员工培训计划提高医护人员在药物管理方面的知识和技能。结论:尽管南澳有全国性的质量管理政策和计划,并且有证据表明个别的质量管理干预措施对当地产生了显著的积极影响,但需要更多大规模、多中心的研究来全面了解质量管理实践。对现有项目进行更严格的评估,并扩大QUM项目的范围以与国际项目保持一致,可以进一步改善沙特阿拉伯的药物安全性和患者预后。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) Programs and Strategies in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Fahad Aldhafeeri, Andrew Wilson, Shaun Larkin, Faisal Murayh Aldhafeeri","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S503383","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S503383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high prevalence of chronic diseases, workforce challenges, and growing polypharmacy adversely impact the quality use of medicines (QUM) and health outcomes in Saudi Arabia (SA). The SA Ministry of Health (MOH) has initiated several programs and policies to enhance QUM including a National Medication Safety Program, national clinical guidelines, and technology-based strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the published literature on the range, quality, and effectiveness of QUM methods in the SA health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive search of electronic databases Scopus, Medline, and PubMed for papers reporting evaluation of QUM interventions or programs in SA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QUM programs involving medication reconciliation, interventions by hospital pharmacists, antibiotics stewardship, technology and staff training are the most commonly used programs reported in SA. Evaluations of several QUM interventions found a significant positive impact on health outcomes, prescribing patterns, chronic disease management, medication safety, and healthcare costs. Medication reconciliation programs reduced discrepancies by up to 20% in some studies. Hospital pharmacist interventions showed high acceptance rates (up to 92%) and improved medication safety. Antibiotic stewardship programs effectively reduced antimicrobial use and costs. Health information technology implementations like electronic health records (EHR), and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) showed mixed results but generally improved medication safety and efficiency. Staff training initiatives enhanced healthcare professionals' knowledge and skills in medication management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While SA has national QUM policies and programs, and evidence that individual QUM interventions have significant positive local impact, more large-scale, multi-center studies are needed to provide a comprehensive view of QUM practices. More rigorous evaluations of existing programs and expansion of the range of QUM programs to align with international ones could further improve medication safety and patient outcomes in Saudi Arabia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951919/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143751535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of Antipsychotic Initiation Among Older Dementia Patients Initiating Cholinesterase Inhibitors. 老年痴呆患者启动胆碱酯酶抑制剂抗精神病药物的风险
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S506523
Soumya G Chikermane, Jieni Li, Rajender R Aparasu

Background: Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are recognized as first-line therapies for patients with mild-to-moderate dementia. However, there is limited comparative evidence regarding antipsychotic initiation risk among individual ChEIs to manage behavioral symptoms of dementia.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the risk of antipsychotic initiation among dementia patients prescribed individual ChEIs.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using the 2009-2018 TriNetX electronic medical records data. Dementia patients aged over 60 years who were incident users of rivastigmine, donepezil, or galantamine with a 12-month washout period were included. Patients with a history of antipsychotic use during baseline and 30 days post-initiation of ChEIs were excluded. Patients were followed up to 12 months to identify the antipsychotic use. A generalized boosted model-based inverse probability treatment weights-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) model was applied to compare the risk of antipsychotic initiation across the different ChEIs.

Results: Among the 7,878 eligible dementia patients initiating ChEIs, 89.40% (n=7,043) were incident donepezil users, followed by 8.13% of (n=641) rivastigmine users, and 2.46% (n=194) galantamine users. During the 12-month follow-up, 807 patients (10.24%) initiated antipsychotics. The CPH model showed that rivastigmine users were at an increased risk of antipsychotic use compared to donepezil users (adjusted hazard ratio=1.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.88). No significant difference was observed in the risk of antipsychotic initiation between galantamine and donepezil users.

Conclusion: This study found that rivastigmine users were more likely to initiate antipsychotics compared to donepezil users, while no significant difference between galantamine and donepezil users was observed. These findings emphasize the importance of careful medication monitoring and management to prevent prescribing cascades and reduce related adverse effects in dementia patients.

背景:胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEIs)被认为是轻中度痴呆患者的一线治疗药物。然而,关于个体ChEIs抗精神病药物起始风险管理痴呆行为症状的比较证据有限。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较痴呆患者的抗精神病药物的开始风险,处方单独的ChEIs。方法:采用2009-2018年TriNetX电子病历数据进行回顾性队列研究。年龄在60岁以上的痴呆患者,他们是雷瓦斯汀、多奈哌齐或加兰他明的意外使用者,并有12个月的洗脱期。排除基线期间和ChEIs开始后30天有抗精神病药物使用史的患者。患者随访12个月以确定抗精神病药物的使用情况。应用基于广义增强模型的逆概率治疗权重调整Cox比例风险(CPH)模型来比较不同ChEIs的抗精神病药物起始风险。结果:在7878例启动chei的符合条件的痴呆患者中,89.40% (n= 7043)为多奈哌齐使用者,其次是8.13% (n=641)的利瓦斯汀使用者和2.46% (n=194)的加兰他明使用者。在12个月的随访中,807例患者(10.24%)开始使用抗精神病药物。CPH模型显示,与多奈哌齐使用者相比,利瓦斯汀使用者使用抗精神病药物的风险增加(校正风险比=1.45,95%置信区间:1.11-1.88)。在使用加兰他明和多奈哌齐的人群中,抗精神病药物开始发作的风险没有显著差异。结论:本研究发现,与多奈哌齐使用者相比,利瓦斯汀使用者更有可能启动抗精神病药物,而加兰他敏与多奈哌齐使用者之间无显著差异。这些发现强调了仔细的药物监测和管理的重要性,以防止处方级联反应并减少痴呆患者的相关不良反应。
{"title":"Risk of Antipsychotic Initiation Among Older Dementia Patients Initiating Cholinesterase Inhibitors.","authors":"Soumya G Chikermane, Jieni Li, Rajender R Aparasu","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S506523","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S506523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are recognized as first-line therapies for patients with mild-to-moderate dementia. However, there is limited comparative evidence regarding antipsychotic initiation risk among individual ChEIs to manage behavioral symptoms of dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the risk of antipsychotic initiation among dementia patients prescribed individual ChEIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study using the 2009-2018 TriNetX electronic medical records data. Dementia patients aged over 60 years who were incident users of rivastigmine, donepezil, or galantamine with a 12-month washout period were included. Patients with a history of antipsychotic use during baseline and 30 days post-initiation of ChEIs were excluded. Patients were followed up to 12 months to identify the antipsychotic use. A generalized boosted model-based inverse probability treatment weights-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) model was applied to compare the risk of antipsychotic initiation across the different ChEIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 7,878 eligible dementia patients initiating ChEIs, 89.40% (n=7,043) were incident donepezil users, followed by 8.13% of (n=641) rivastigmine users, and 2.46% (n=194) galantamine users. During the 12-month follow-up, 807 patients (10.24%) initiated antipsychotics. The CPH model showed that rivastigmine users were at an increased risk of antipsychotic use compared to donepezil users (adjusted hazard ratio=1.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.88). No significant difference was observed in the risk of antipsychotic initiation between galantamine and donepezil users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that rivastigmine users were more likely to initiate antipsychotics compared to donepezil users, while no significant difference between galantamine and donepezil users was observed. These findings emphasize the importance of careful medication monitoring and management to prevent prescribing cascades and reduce related adverse effects in dementia patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143699914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Respiratory Failure Following Trauma: A Retrospective Study Using the MIMIC-IV Database. 预测创伤后呼吸衰竭患者生存的Nomogram:一项使用MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性研究。
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S497413
Peihan Li, Xuejuan Wang, Li Li

Background: Respiratory failure (RF) after trauma is one of the major causes of patients being admitted to the ICU and leads to a high mortality rate. However, we cannot predict mortality rates based on patients' various indicators. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting mortality in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: A total of 377 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were included in the study. All participants were systematically divided into a development cohort for modelling and a validation cohort for internal validation at a ratio of 7:3. Following patient admission, a comprehensive collection of 30 clinical indicators was performed. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression technique was employed to discern pivotal risk factors. A multivariate Cox regression model was established, and a receiver operating curve (ROC) was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed, and the nomogram was compared with the acute physiology score III (APSIII) and Oxford acute severity of illness score (OASIS) scoring systems to assess the net clinical benefit.

Results: The indicators included in our model were age, OASIS score, SAPS III score, respiratory rate (RR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and hematocrit. The results demonstrated that our model yielded satisfied performance on the development cohort and on internal validation. The calibration curve underscored a robust concordance between predicted and actual outcomes. The DCA showed a superior clinical utility of our model in contrast to previously reported scoring systems.

Conclusion: In summary, we devised a nomogram for predicting mortality during the ICU stay of RF patients following trauma and established a prediction model that facilitates clinical decision making. However, external validation is needed in the future.

背景:创伤后呼吸衰竭(RF)是患者入住ICU的主要原因之一,并导致高死亡率。然而,我们不能根据患者的各种指标来预测死亡率。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种预测重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡率的nomogram。方法:从重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC)-IV数据库中共纳入377例患者。所有参与者按7:3的比例被系统地分为用于建模的开发队列和用于内部验证的验证队列。患者入院后,进行了30项临床指标的综合收集。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归技术识别关键危险因素。建立多变量Cox回归模型,绘制受试者工作曲线(ROC),计算曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,进行决策曲线分析(DCA),并将nomogram与急性生理评分III (APSIII)和牛津急性疾病严重程度评分(OASIS)评分系统进行比较,以评估净临床获益。结果:模型纳入的指标为年龄、OASIS评分、SAPS评分、呼吸频率(RR)、血尿素氮(BUN)、红细胞压积(hematocrit)。结果表明,我们的模型在开发队列和内部验证中产生了令人满意的性能。校准曲线强调了预测结果与实际结果之间的一致性。与先前报道的评分系统相比,DCA显示了我们模型的优越临床效用。结论:综上所述,我们设计了一个预测创伤后RF患者ICU住院期间死亡率的nomogram,并建立了一个预测模型,便于临床决策。但是,将来需要外部验证。
{"title":"A Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Respiratory Failure Following Trauma: A Retrospective Study Using the MIMIC-IV Database.","authors":"Peihan Li, Xuejuan Wang, Li Li","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S497413","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S497413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory failure (RF) after trauma is one of the major causes of patients being admitted to the ICU and leads to a high mortality rate. However, we cannot predict mortality rates based on patients' various indicators. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting mortality in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 377 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were included in the study. All participants were systematically divided into a development cohort for modelling and a validation cohort for internal validation at a ratio of 7:3. Following patient admission, a comprehensive collection of 30 clinical indicators was performed. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression technique was employed to discern pivotal risk factors. A multivariate Cox regression model was established, and a receiver operating curve (ROC) was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed, and the nomogram was compared with the acute physiology score III (APSIII) and Oxford acute severity of illness score (OASIS) scoring systems to assess the net clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The indicators included in our model were age, OASIS score, SAPS III score, respiratory rate (RR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and hematocrit. The results demonstrated that our model yielded satisfied performance on the development cohort and on internal validation. The calibration curve underscored a robust concordance between predicted and actual outcomes. The DCA showed a superior clinical utility of our model in contrast to previously reported scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we devised a nomogram for predicting mortality during the ICU stay of RF patients following trauma and established a prediction model that facilitates clinical decision making. However, external validation is needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890444/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143585158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Fluoroquinolones and Other Antibiotics: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Study. 氟喹诺酮类药物与其他抗生素不良反应的比较分析:回顾性药物警戒研究。
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S497112
Hanan Alshareef, Khalidah A Alenzi, Budor R Albalawi, Rinas M Alanazi, Nawal S Albalawi, Wedad Saleem Alasoufi, Saleh Alqifari, Rehab Ahmed, Mostafa A S Ali

Background: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are among the most popular antimicrobials that are highly effective against various infections. Although FQs are the most frequently used and generally tolerated, there are issues with their safety. This study assessed the rate, severity, seriousness, outcomes, and types of FQs adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in reports submitted to a regional spontaneous ADR database.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study involving all patients with reported ADRs related to FQs or other antibiotics (ABs) that were submitted to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center (PVC) database between January 2019 and December 2022. Data were extracted in the form of Saudi ADR from the PVC database, which is consistent with the MedWatch ADR form of the U.S Food and Drug Authority (FDA).

Results: In total, 605 ADRs related to antibiotic use were reported. ADRs caused by FQs use were the most frequently reported (177; 29.3%), followed by penicillin (100; 23.4%) and cephalosporin (90; 21%). There was no significant difference in ADRs caused by FQs between men (104; 58%) and women (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.67, p=0.386). FQ-related ADRs were more frequent among those over 40 years-old (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.22, p=0.015). Most of the detected FQ-related ADRs were of moderate severity (157; 88.7%), required interventions (83; 46.9%), and recovered after receiving medical interventions (154; 87%). Patients who received FQs were fourfold more likely to experience neurological adverse events (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.48-6.93, p <0.001).

Conclusion: The FQs drug class exhibited a higher incidence of ADRs than other ABs. Regularly assessing the safety of ABs is crucial to improve public and healthcare providers' awareness of the correct utilization of ABs and to limit the use of FQs to infections that cannot be effectively managed with alternative ABs.

背景:氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)是最流行的抗微生物药物之一,对各种感染都非常有效。虽然FQs是最常用的,而且普遍耐受,但它们的安全性存在问题。本研究评估了提交给区域自发性ADR数据库的报告中FQs药物不良反应(ADR)的发生率、严重程度、严重性、结局和类型。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面观察性研究,涉及2019年1月至2022年12月期间提交给区域药物警戒中心(PVC)数据库的所有报告与FQs或其他抗生素(ABs)相关的adr的患者。数据以沙特ADR的形式从PVC数据库中提取,这与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的MedWatch ADR表格一致。结果:共报告605例与抗生素使用相关的不良反应。使用FQs引起的不良反应是最常见的(177;29.3%),其次是青霉素(100;23.4%)和头孢菌素(90;21%)。男性间由FQs引起的不良反应无显著差异(104;58%)和女性(OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.67, p=0.386)。fq相关不良反应在40岁以上人群中更为常见(OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.22, p=0.015)。大多数检测到的fq相关不良反应为中等严重程度(157;88.7%),需要的干预措施(83;46.9%),并在接受医疗干预后康复(154;87%)。接受FQs的患者发生神经系统不良事件的可能性是其他抗体的四倍(OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.48-6.93, p)。结论:FQs药物类别比其他抗体显示出更高的不良反应发生率。定期评估抗体的安全性对于提高公众和医疗保健提供者对正确使用抗体的认识,并将FQs的使用限制在替代抗体无法有效控制的感染中至关重要。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Fluoroquinolones and Other Antibiotics: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Study.","authors":"Hanan Alshareef, Khalidah A Alenzi, Budor R Albalawi, Rinas M Alanazi, Nawal S Albalawi, Wedad Saleem Alasoufi, Saleh Alqifari, Rehab Ahmed, Mostafa A S Ali","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S497112","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S497112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are among the most popular antimicrobials that are highly effective against various infections. Although FQs are the most frequently used and generally tolerated, there are issues with their safety. This study assessed the rate, severity, seriousness, outcomes, and types of FQs adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in reports submitted to a regional spontaneous ADR database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study involving all patients with reported ADRs related to FQs or other antibiotics (ABs) that were submitted to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center (PVC) database between January 2019 and December 2022. Data were extracted in the form of Saudi ADR from the PVC database, which is consistent with the MedWatch ADR form of the U.S Food and Drug Authority (FDA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 605 ADRs related to antibiotic use were reported. ADRs caused by FQs use were the most frequently reported (177; 29.3%), followed by penicillin (100; 23.4%) and cephalosporin (90; 21%). There was no significant difference in ADRs caused by FQs between men (104; 58%) and women (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.67, p=0.386). FQ-related ADRs were more frequent among those over 40 years-old (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.22, p=0.015). Most of the detected FQ-related ADRs were of moderate severity (157; 88.7%), required interventions (83; 46.9%), and recovered after receiving medical interventions (154; 87%). Patients who received FQs were fourfold more likely to experience neurological adverse events (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.48-6.93, p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FQs drug class exhibited a higher incidence of ADRs than other ABs. Regularly assessing the safety of ABs is crucial to improve public and healthcare providers' awareness of the correct utilization of ABs and to limit the use of FQs to infections that cannot be effectively managed with alternative ABs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"51-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807382/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Real-World Evidence to Assess Effectiveness Outcomes of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of US Studies. 评估Janus激酶抑制剂治疗类风湿关节炎疗效的真实世界证据:美国研究的系统回顾
IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S492887
Chandler Gandy, Shadi Bazzazzadehgan, Sebastian Bruera, Yinan Huang

Objective: This review summarized the real-world effectiveness outcomes of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on observational studies.

Methods: A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, with searches conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL from each database's inception to June 2, 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated real-world effectiveness outcomes of JAKi for US RA patients. Search terms included "RA", "JAKi", and "real-world". All citations were imported into COVIDENCE platform. Two reviewers independently performed title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility. For each article, study characteristics and effectiveness measures focusing on treatment pattern, clinical response, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of JAKi were extracted. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was utilized to assess the quality of the included articles.

Results: In total, 35 studies representing 252-30,556 patients were included. A majority used the administrative claims datasets (n=23, 65.71%), followed by 9 studies using electronic medical record (EMR) data and 3 studies using patient registry databases. Across claims-based studies, adherence, persistence, and effectiveness of JAKi were common outcomes. Adherence rates varied, with a proportion of days covered (PDC) ranging from 0.53 to 0.83 across 11 studies. Persistence of JAKi in RA patients was reported in 14 studies, where the median persistence time in treatment was reported to be between 121-516 days. Six studies applied effectiveness algorithms, with 14.8-26% of patients meeting effective treatment criteria. In addition, the most common measure of clinical response throughout the studies was Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), with 10 articles reporting mean CDAI changes between -4.7 and 5.1. Across 12 studies that measured the PROs, the most prevalent PRO was pain, with the mean change in pain ranging from -9.3 to 8.9 across these studies.

Conclusion: Real-world studies on JAKi for RA reflect a range of effectiveness measures, illustrating the expanding role of JAKi in clinical practice.

目的:本综述根据观察性研究总结了类风湿关节炎(RA)患者使用 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)的实际疗效:本综述基于观察性研究总结了类风湿关节炎(RA)的 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)的实际疗效:系统性综述遵循PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Embase和CINAHL中进行了检索,检索时间从各数据库建立之初至2023年6月2日。对美国RA患者使用JAKi的实际疗效进行评估的研究均被纳入。检索词包括 "RA"、"JAKi "和 "真实世界"。所有引文均导入 COVIDENCE 平台。两名审稿人独立进行标题/摘要筛选和全文资格审查。对每篇文章的研究特点和有效性指标进行了提取,重点关注JAKi的治疗模式、临床反应和患者报告结果(PROs)。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估纳入文章的质量:共纳入35项研究,代表252-30556名患者。大多数研究使用了行政报销数据集(23 项,占 65.71%),9 项研究使用了电子病历数据,3 项研究使用了患者登记数据库。在基于索赔的研究中,JAKi的依从性、持续性和有效性是常见的结果。依从率各不相同,11项研究中的覆盖天数比例(PDC)从0.53到0.83不等。14项研究报告了JAKi在RA患者中的持续治疗情况,中位持续治疗时间介于121-516天之间。六项研究采用了疗效算法,14.8%-26%的患者符合有效治疗标准。此外,临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)是所有研究中最常用的临床反应测量指标,有10篇文章报道了CDAI的平均变化介于-4.7和5.1之间。在12项测量PRO的研究中,最常见的PRO是疼痛,这些研究中疼痛的平均变化范围在-9.3到8.9之间:结论:有关JAKi治疗RA的真实世界研究反映了一系列有效性指标,说明JAKi在临床实践中的作用正在不断扩大。
{"title":"Evaluation of Real-World Evidence to Assess Effectiveness Outcomes of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of US Studies.","authors":"Chandler Gandy, Shadi Bazzazzadehgan, Sebastian Bruera, Yinan Huang","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S492887","DOIUrl":"10.2147/DHPS.S492887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review summarized the real-world effectiveness outcomes of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, with searches conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL from each database's inception to June 2, 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated real-world effectiveness outcomes of JAKi for US RA patients. Search terms included \"RA\", \"JAKi\", and \"real-world\". All citations were imported into COVIDENCE platform. Two reviewers independently performed title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility. For each article, study characteristics and effectiveness measures focusing on treatment pattern, clinical response, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of JAKi were extracted. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was utilized to assess the quality of the included articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 35 studies representing 252-30,556 patients were included. A majority used the administrative claims datasets (n=23, 65.71%), followed by 9 studies using electronic medical record (EMR) data and 3 studies using patient registry databases. Across claims-based studies, adherence, persistence, and effectiveness of JAKi were common outcomes. Adherence rates varied, with a proportion of days covered (PDC) ranging from 0.53 to 0.83 across 11 studies. Persistence of JAKi in RA patients was reported in 14 studies, where the median persistence time in treatment was reported to be between 121-516 days. Six studies applied effectiveness algorithms, with 14.8-26% of patients meeting effective treatment criteria. In addition, the most common measure of clinical response throughout the studies was Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), with 10 articles reporting mean CDAI changes between -4.7 and 5.1. Across 12 studies that measured the PROs, the most prevalent PRO was pain, with the mean change in pain ranging from -9.3 to 8.9 across these studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-world studies on JAKi for RA reflect a range of effectiveness measures, illustrating the expanding role of JAKi in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"25-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724667/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142970106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1