首页 > 最新文献

Endoscopy International Open最新文献

英文 中文
Mechanical evaluation of the dilation force of dilation devices during interventional endoscopic ultrasound. 在介入性内窥镜超声检查中对扩张装置的扩张力进行机械评估。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2351-0647
Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Masahiro Yamamura, Nobuhiro Hattori, Kimi Bessho, Hiroki Nishikawa, Rie Kanaoka, Youhei Kurose

Background and study aims To insert the metal stent delivery system (8.5F) during interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS), several dilation steps are needed, which may be related to increased bile leakage from a fistula. There have been no definitive studies of dilation force. The aim of the present study was to evaluate dilation force during I-EUS using several dilation devices. Methods In the present study, seven dilation devices were evaluated including bougie dilators such as a straight-shaped dilator (the ES dilator, Soehendra dilator, a standard ERCP catheter) a screw-shaped dilator (Tornus ES, Soehendra stent retriever), and a 4-mm balloon catheter (REN biliary balloon catheter, Hurricane RX). The diameter of each dilator and dilation force were measured. Results Of the bougie dilators, the dilation force of the ES dilator was the highest (0.908±0.035 kg). Of the balloon catheters, the dilation force of the Hurricane RX (3.261±0.024 kg) was slightly higher than that of the REN (3.159±0.072 kg). Of the bougie dilators, although the diameter of the ES dilator was not larger than that of the Tornus ES, the dilation force was stronger. Similarly, the diameter of the Soehendra stent retriever was greater than that of the ERCP catheter or Soehendra dilator and the dilation force was lower. Conclusions Compared with bougie dilators, balloon catheters have stronger dilation force according to our experimental study. The present results should be evaluated in clinical trials.

背景和研究目的 在介入性内窥镜超声检查(I-EUS)过程中插入金属支架输送系统(8.5F)需要几个扩张步骤,这可能与瘘管胆汁渗漏增加有关。目前还没有关于扩张力的确切研究。本研究旨在评估 I-EUS 期间使用几种扩张装置的扩张力。方法 在本研究中,对七种扩张装置进行了评估,包括直形扩张器(ES 扩张器、Soehendra 扩张器、标准 ERCP 导管)、螺旋形扩张器(Tornus ES、Soehendra 支架牵引器)和 4 毫米球囊导管(REN 胆道球囊导管、Hurricane RX)。对每种扩张器的直径和扩张力进行了测量。结果 在各种扩张器中,ES 扩张器的扩张力最大(0.908±0.035 千克)。在球囊导管中,Hurricane RX(3.261±0.024 kg)的扩张力略高于 REN(3.159±0.072 kg)。在套管扩张器中,虽然 ES 扩张器的直径并不比 Tornus ES 大,但扩张力却更强。同样,Soehendra 支架牵引器的直径大于 ERCP 导管或 Soehendra 扩张器,但扩张力较低。结论 根据我们的实验研究,与球囊扩张器相比,球囊导管具有更强的扩张力。本结果应在临床试验中进行评估。
{"title":"Mechanical evaluation of the dilation force of dilation devices during interventional endoscopic ultrasound.","authors":"Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Masahiro Yamamura, Nobuhiro Hattori, Kimi Bessho, Hiroki Nishikawa, Rie Kanaoka, Youhei Kurose","doi":"10.1055/a-2351-0647","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2351-0647","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> To insert the metal stent delivery system (8.5F) during interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS), several dilation steps are needed, which may be related to increased bile leakage from a fistula. There have been no definitive studies of dilation force. The aim of the present study was to evaluate dilation force during I-EUS using several dilation devices. <b>Methods</b> In the present study, seven dilation devices were evaluated including bougie dilators such as a straight-shaped dilator (the ES dilator, Soehendra dilator, a standard ERCP catheter) a screw-shaped dilator (Tornus ES, Soehendra stent retriever), and a 4-mm balloon catheter (REN biliary balloon catheter, Hurricane RX). The diameter of each dilator and dilation force were measured. <b>Results</b> Of the bougie dilators, the dilation force of the ES dilator was the highest (0.908±0.035 kg). Of the balloon catheters, the dilation force of the Hurricane RX (3.261±0.024 kg) was slightly higher than that of the REN (3.159±0.072 kg). Of the bougie dilators, although the diameter of the ES dilator was not larger than that of the Tornus ES, the dilation force was stronger. Similarly, the diameter of the Soehendra stent retriever was greater than that of the ERCP catheter or Soehendra dilator and the dilation force was lower. <b>Conclusions</b> Compared with bougie dilators, balloon catheters have stronger dilation force according to our experimental study. The present results should be evaluated in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 8","pages":"E955-E961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309796/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gastric variceal obstruction improves the efficacy of endoscopic management of esophageal variceal bleeding in GOV type I. 胃食管静脉曲张阻塞可提高内镜治疗 GOV I 型食管静脉曲张出血的疗效。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2360-4490
Xiaoquan Huang, Detong Zou, Huishan Wang, Wei Chen, Lili Zhang, Feng Li, Lili Ma, Chunqing Zhang, Ying Chen, Shiyao Chen

Background and study aims Limited data exist regarding endoscopic obstruction of type I gastroesophageal (GOV I) in managing bleeding from esophageal varices. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to access the efficacy of blocking gastric varices in management of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV1. Patients and methods Cirrhotic patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices and having GOV I gastric varices in four centers were screened. All included patients were followed up for 180 days, or until death. Results A total of 93 cirrhotic patients with GOV I and bleeding esophageal varices were included. Among them, 58 patients underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) for gastric varices in addition to treatment for esophageal varices (EV), while the remaining 35 patients received treatment for EV only. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the cumulative 180-day rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the ECI plus EV treatment group (7.9%) compared with the EV treatment group (30.7%) ( P = 0.0031). The cumulative incidence of 180-day mortality was 1.9% in the ECI plus EV treatment group and 23.9% in the EV treatment group ( P = 0.0010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that concomitant ECI treatment was an independent protective factor against 180-day rebleeding and overall mortality. Conclusions In conclusion, obstruction of gastric varices in addition to endoscopic treatment for bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV 1 proved superior to endoscopic treatment alone for esophageal variceal bleeding.

背景和研究目的 关于内镜下阻断 I 型胃食管(GOV I)治疗食管静脉曲张出血的数据有限。在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,我们旨在了解阻断胃静脉曲张对治疗 GOV1 患者食管静脉曲张出血的疗效。患者和方法 筛选了四个中心的食管静脉曲张出血且患有 GOV I 型胃静脉曲张的肝硬化患者。对所有纳入患者进行了为期 180 天的随访,或随访至患者死亡。结果 共纳入了 93 名 GOV I 型和食管静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者。其中,58名患者在接受内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射(ECI)治疗胃静脉曲张的同时还接受了食管静脉曲张(EV)治疗,其余35名患者仅接受了食管静脉曲张治疗。卡普兰-梅耶分析显示,ECI加EV治疗组的180天累计再出血率(7.9%)明显低于EV治疗组(30.7%)(P = 0.0031)。ECI加EV治疗组的180天累计死亡率为1.9%,EV治疗组为23.9% ( P = 0.0010)。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,同时接受 ECI 治疗是降低 180 天再出血和总死亡率的独立保护因素。结论 总之,对于 GOV 1 患者的食管静脉曲张出血,在内镜治疗的同时阻塞胃静脉曲张证明优于单纯内镜治疗食管静脉曲张出血。
{"title":"Gastric variceal obstruction improves the efficacy of endoscopic management of esophageal variceal bleeding in GOV type I.","authors":"Xiaoquan Huang, Detong Zou, Huishan Wang, Wei Chen, Lili Zhang, Feng Li, Lili Ma, Chunqing Zhang, Ying Chen, Shiyao Chen","doi":"10.1055/a-2360-4490","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2360-4490","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Limited data exist regarding endoscopic obstruction of type I gastroesophageal (GOV I) in managing bleeding from esophageal varices. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to access the efficacy of blocking gastric varices in management of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV1. <b>Patients and methods</b> Cirrhotic patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices and having GOV I gastric varices in four centers were screened. All included patients were followed up for 180 days, or until death. <b>Results</b> A total of 93 cirrhotic patients with GOV I and bleeding esophageal varices were included. Among them, 58 patients underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) for gastric varices in addition to treatment for esophageal varices (EV), while the remaining 35 patients received treatment for EV only. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the cumulative 180-day rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the ECI plus EV treatment group (7.9%) compared with the EV treatment group (30.7%) ( <i>P</i> = 0.0031). The cumulative incidence of 180-day mortality was 1.9% in the ECI plus EV treatment group and 23.9% in the EV treatment group ( <i>P</i> = 0.0010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that concomitant ECI treatment was an independent protective factor against 180-day rebleeding and overall mortality. <b>Conclusions</b> In conclusion, obstruction of gastric varices in addition to endoscopic treatment for bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV 1 proved superior to endoscopic treatment alone for esophageal variceal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 8","pages":"E940-E946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309793/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mortality from upper gastrointestinal tumors in colorectal cancer screening patients. 大肠癌筛查患者因上消化道肿瘤死亡的情况。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2348-9264
Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Daniela Penz, Anna Hinterberger, Barbara Majcher, Arno Asaturi, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch

Background and study aims Currently, gastric cancer screening is only cost-effective in countries with high incidence. Integrated screening, in which gastroscopy is performed in conjunction with colonoscopy, could help reduce the gastric cancer screening procedure burden in countries with low or intermediate incidence. However, there is a lack of population-based studies to identify high-risk groups. Methods In this retrospective analysis of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program database, we used Cox proportional hazards model to identify an association of high- and low-risk finding (polyps ≥ 10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia) with time to death from upper gastrointestinal cancer (esophageal and gastric). We estimated the 10-year mortality of upper gastrointestinal tumors in different 10-year age groups, stratified by sex and polyp finding at colonoscopy. Results We included 349,856 CRC screening colonoscopies in our study. The median follow-up time was 5.22 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.21-5.24 years). Of the participants, 4.5% had polyps ≥ 10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). At the end of the study period, 384 deaths from upper gastrointestinal cancer had occurred. Aside from age and sex, we found the presence of high-risk polyps to be significantly associated with upper gastrointestinal cancer death (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.06-2.25, P = 0.025). Conclusions CRC screening participants with polyps < 10 mm and no HGD have a lower risk for mortality from upper gastrointestinal cancers compared with participants with polyps > 10 mm and HGD. Future studies will demonstrate whether integrated screening with additional gastroscopy is effective in CRC screening participants with large or highly dysplastic polyps.

背景和研究目的 目前,胃癌筛查只有在高发国家才具有成本效益。综合筛查,即胃镜检查与结肠镜检查同时进行,有助于减轻中低等发病率国家的胃癌筛查负担。然而,目前还缺乏基于人群的研究来确定高危人群。方法 在这项对结直肠癌(CRC)筛查项目数据库的回顾性分析中,我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型来确定高风险和低风险发现(息肉≥ 10 毫米或伴有高级别发育不良)与上消化道癌(食管癌和胃癌)死亡时间的关系。我们根据性别和结肠镜检查时发现息肉的情况,估算了不同 10 岁年龄组的上消化道肿瘤 10 年死亡率。结果 我们的研究纳入了 349 856 例 CRC 结肠镜筛查。中位随访时间为 5.22 年(95% 置信区间 [CI] 5.21-5.24 年)。参与者中,4.5%的人息肉≥10 毫米或伴有高级别发育不良(HGD)。研究结束时,共有 384 人死于上消化道癌症。除年龄和性别外,我们还发现高风险息肉与上消化道癌症死亡有显著相关性(危险比 1.54,95% CI 1.06-2.25,P = 0.025)。结论 与息肉大于 10 毫米且无 HGD 的参与者相比,息肉小于 10 毫米且无 HGD 的 CRC 筛查参与者死于上消化道癌症的风险较低。未来的研究将证明,对于患有大息肉或高度发育不良息肉的 CRC 筛查参与者来说,附加胃镜检查的综合筛查是否有效。
{"title":"Mortality from upper gastrointestinal tumors in colorectal cancer screening patients.","authors":"Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Elisabeth Waldmann, Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer, Daniela Penz, Anna Hinterberger, Barbara Majcher, Arno Asaturi, Michael Trauner, Monika Ferlitsch","doi":"10.1055/a-2348-9264","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2348-9264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Currently, gastric cancer screening is only cost-effective in countries with high incidence. Integrated screening, in which gastroscopy is performed in conjunction with colonoscopy, could help reduce the gastric cancer screening procedure burden in countries with low or intermediate incidence. However, there is a lack of population-based studies to identify high-risk groups. <b>Methods</b> In this retrospective analysis of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program database, we used Cox proportional hazards model to identify an association of high- and low-risk finding (polyps ≥ 10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia) with time to death from upper gastrointestinal cancer (esophageal and gastric). We estimated the 10-year mortality of upper gastrointestinal tumors in different 10-year age groups, stratified by sex and polyp finding at colonoscopy. <b>Results</b> We included 349,856 CRC screening colonoscopies in our study. The median follow-up time was 5.22 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.21-5.24 years). Of the participants, 4.5% had polyps ≥ 10 mm or with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). At the end of the study period, 384 deaths from upper gastrointestinal cancer had occurred. Aside from age and sex, we found the presence of high-risk polyps to be significantly associated with upper gastrointestinal cancer death (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.06-2.25, <i>P</i> = 0.025). <b>Conclusions</b> CRC screening participants with polyps < 10 mm and no HGD have a lower risk for mortality from upper gastrointestinal cancers compared with participants with polyps > 10 mm and HGD. Future studies will demonstrate whether integrated screening with additional gastroscopy is effective in CRC screening participants with large or highly dysplastic polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E916-E923"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272413/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Value of green sign and chicken skin aspects for detecting malignancy of colorectal neoplasia in a prospective characterization study. 在一项前瞻性特征研究中,绿色征象和鸡皮征象对检测结直肠肿瘤恶性程度的价值。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2350-9631
Pierre Lafeuille, Jérôme Rivory, Alexandru Lupu, Florian Rostain, Jeremie Jacques, Thimothee Wallenhorst, Adrien Bartoli, Serge Torti, Tanguy Fenouil, Frederic Moll, Fabien Subtil, Mathieu Pioche

Background and study aims Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential for predicting histology but is difficult even for experts. Simple criteria could help endoscopists to detect and predict malignancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the green sign and chicken skin aspects in detection of malignant colorectal neoplasia. Patients and methods We prospectively characterized and evaluated the histology of all consecutive colorectal lesions detected during screening or referred for endoscopic resection (Pro-CONECCT study). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the green sign and chicken skin aspects for detection of superficial and deep invasive lesions. Results 461 patients with 803 colorectal lesions were included. The green sign had a negative predictive value of 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.1%-91.8%) and 98.1% (95% CI 96.7%-99.0%) for superficial and deep invasive lesions, respectively. In contrast to chicken skin, the green sign showed additional value for detection of both lesion types compared with the CONECCT classification and chicken skin (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for superficial lesions 5.9; 95% CI 3.4-10.2; P <0.001), adjusted OR for deep lesions 9.0; 95% CI 3.9-21.1; P <0.001). Conclusions The green sign may be associated with malignant colorectal neoplasia. Targeting these areas before precise analysis of the lesion could be a way of improving detection of focal malignancies and prediction of the most severe histology.

背景和研究目的 对结直肠病变进行准确的内镜定性对于预测组织学至关重要,但即使是专家也很难做到。简单的标准可以帮助内镜医师检测和预测恶性肿瘤。本研究旨在评估绿色征和鸡皮征在检测恶性结直肠肿瘤方面的价值。患者和方法 我们对所有在筛查中发现或转诊进行内镜切除的连续结直肠病变进行了前瞻性特征描述和组织学评估(Pro-CONECCT 研究)。我们评估了绿色征和鸡皮征在检测表层和深层浸润性病变方面的诊断准确性。结果 共纳入 461 名患者,803 个结肠直肠病变。绿色征象对浅表和深部浸润性病变的阴性预测值分别为 89.6%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 87.1%-91.8%)和 98.1%(95% 置信区间 96.7%-99.0%)。与鸡皮相比,绿色征与 CONECCT 分类和鸡皮相比,对两种病变类型的检测都有额外价值(浅表病变的调整比值比 [OR] 为 5.9;95% CI 为 3.4-10.2;P P 结论 绿色征可能与恶性结直肠肿瘤有关。在对病变进行精确分析之前,锁定这些区域可能是提高病灶恶性肿瘤检测率和预测最严重组织学的一种方法。
{"title":"Value of green sign and chicken skin aspects for detecting malignancy of colorectal neoplasia in a prospective characterization study.","authors":"Pierre Lafeuille, Jérôme Rivory, Alexandru Lupu, Florian Rostain, Jeremie Jacques, Thimothee Wallenhorst, Adrien Bartoli, Serge Torti, Tanguy Fenouil, Frederic Moll, Fabien Subtil, Mathieu Pioche","doi":"10.1055/a-2350-9631","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2350-9631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential for predicting histology but is difficult even for experts. Simple criteria could help endoscopists to detect and predict malignancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the green sign and chicken skin aspects in detection of malignant colorectal neoplasia. <b>Patients and methods</b> We prospectively characterized and evaluated the histology of all consecutive colorectal lesions detected during screening or referred for endoscopic resection (Pro-CONECCT study). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the green sign and chicken skin aspects for detection of superficial and deep invasive lesions. <b>Results</b> 461 patients with 803 colorectal lesions were included. The green sign had a negative predictive value of 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.1%-91.8%) and 98.1% (95% CI 96.7%-99.0%) for superficial and deep invasive lesions, respectively. In contrast to chicken skin, the green sign showed additional value for detection of both lesion types compared with the CONECCT classification and chicken skin (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for superficial lesions 5.9; 95% CI 3.4-10.2; <i>P</i> <0.001), adjusted OR for deep lesions 9.0; 95% CI 3.9-21.1; <i>P</i> <0.001). <b>Conclusions</b> The green sign may be associated with malignant colorectal neoplasia. Targeting these areas before precise analysis of the lesion could be a way of improving detection of focal malignancies and prediction of the most severe histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E924-E931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategies to successfully complete complex ESD in the colon. 成功完成结肠内复杂 ESD 的策略。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2348-8027
David Barquero Declara, Alex Blasco Pelicano, Claudia Berbel Comas, Alfredo Mata Bilbao
{"title":"Strategies to successfully complete complex ESD in the colon.","authors":"David Barquero Declara, Alex Blasco Pelicano, Claudia Berbel Comas, Alfredo Mata Bilbao","doi":"10.1055/a-2348-8027","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2348-8027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E914-E915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of stent patency between EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage for hilar obstruction. 在 EUS 引导下进行肝胃桥接造口术与内镜下经腹腔胆道引流术治疗肝门梗阻的支架通畅率比较。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-10 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-7898
Kotaro Takeshita, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Akihiro Ohba, Yuki Kawasaki, Tetsuro Takasaki, Shin Yagi, Daiki Agarie, Hidenobu Hara, Yuya Hagiwara, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Mark Chatto, Shunsuke Kondo, Chigusa Morizane, Hideki Ueno, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, P =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, P =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, P =0.05) without significant difference. Conclusions Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.

背景和研究目的 在超声引导下进行肝胃造口术并在左右胆管之间架桥,是内镜下经胆管引流术治疗恶性肝门胆道梗阻的一种替代方法。我们旨在分析内镜超声引导肝胃造口术与桥接术的长期支架通畅性。患者和方法 回顾性分析了 2018 年 4 月至 2023 年 7 月间接受内镜超声引导肝胃造口术加桥接的患者。我们采用非匹配(整体)和倾向得分匹配队列,回顾性比较了这些患者与接受内镜下经肝门引流多支架置入术的患者的支架通畅率。结果 内镜超声引导肝胃造口术加桥接的技术成功率为 90%(18/20)。不良事件极少。使用金属支架的内镜超声引导肝胃吻合术和内镜下经肾盂引流-多支架植入术的临床成功病例数分别为17例和82例。内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加金属支架桥接术和内镜下经毛细血管引流-多支架置入术的胆道梗阻复发率分别为17.6%和58.5%;内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加金属支架桥接术的胆道梗阻复发中位时间(天数)明显长于金属支架桥接术(未达到与内镜下经毛细血管引流-多支架置入术)(P=0.03);内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加金属支架桥接术的胆道梗阻复发中位时间(天数)明显短于金属支架桥接术(P=0.05)。104,P =0.03)和倾向评分匹配队列(183 vs. 79,P =0.05)。3个月和6个月时,内镜超声引导肝胃造口术加桥术的非复发性胆道梗阻率为91.6%,12个月时为57%。多变量分析显示,内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加桥接术降低了复发性胆道梗阻的发生率(危险比为0.31,P=0.05),但无显著差异。结论 在内镜超声引导下行肝胃桥接造口术的支架通畅率明显更高。不过,今后还需要进行前瞻性研究。
{"title":"Comparison of stent patency between EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage for hilar obstruction.","authors":"Kotaro Takeshita, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Akihiro Ohba, Yuki Kawasaki, Tetsuro Takasaki, Shin Yagi, Daiki Agarie, Hidenobu Hara, Yuya Hagiwara, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Mark Chatto, Shunsuke Kondo, Chigusa Morizane, Hideki Ueno, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-7898","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2333-7898","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. <b>Patients and methods</b> Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. <b>Results</b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, <i>P</i> =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, <i>P</i> =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, <i>P</i> =0.05) without significant difference. <b>Conclusions</b> Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E875-E886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236478/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141579320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of chewing gum in bowel preparation for patients undergoing small bowel and colon capsule endoscopy: Systematic review with meta-analysis. 口香糖对小肠和结肠胶囊内窥镜检查患者肠道准备的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-10 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2335-8290
Sofie Sajan Jensen, Ulrik Deding, Lea Østergaard Hansen, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer

Background and study aims Quality of bowel preparation and successful transit are critical factors for complete small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the impact of chewing gum as part of the bowel preparation regimen on the completion rate in both SBCE and CCE. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase. Data were extracted upon quality assessment of included studies. Two reviewers conducted the screening process according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Eighty-four studies met the search criteria and four randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, these were assessed for bias using Minors. Pooled completion rate of SBCE studies was defined as the primary outcome. Results Three randomized controlled trials were SBCE studies and one was a CCE study. The pooled completion rate (91%) was not significantly higher in SBCE patients who were given chewing gum after capsule ingestion compared to those who were not (85%). Variance information was not reported in all studies, and therefore, pooled transit time estimates could not be calculated. Conclusions Chewing gum has a good safety profile but has only been used as a booster in one CCE study and a few SBCE studies. More prospective randomized controlled trials, therefore, are needed to investigate the efficacy of chewing gum for achieving complete capsule examination.

背景和研究目的 肠道准备的质量和成功转运是完成小肠胶囊内窥镜检查(SBCE)和结肠胶囊内窥镜检查(CCE)的关键因素。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估将口香糖作为肠道准备方案的一部分对 SBCE 和 CCE 完成率的影响。方法 在 PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Embase 中进行了系统性文献检索。对纳入的研究进行质量评估后提取数据。两名审稿人根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》进行筛选。有 84 项研究符合检索标准,其中 4 项随机对照试验被纳入荟萃分析,并使用 Minors 对这些试验进行了偏倚评估。SBCE研究的汇总完成率被定义为主要结果。结果 三项随机对照试验为 SBCE 研究,一项为 CCE 研究。摄入胶囊后服用口香糖的 SBCE 患者的汇总完成率(91%)与未服用胶囊的患者(85%)相比并无明显增加。所有研究均未报告方差信息,因此无法计算汇总的转运时间估计值。结论 口香糖具有良好的安全性,但只在一项 CCE 研究和几项 SBCE 研究中被用作增效剂。因此,需要更多的前瞻性随机对照试验来研究口香糖对实现完整胶囊检查的功效。
{"title":"Effect of chewing gum in bowel preparation for patients undergoing small bowel and colon capsule endoscopy: Systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Sofie Sajan Jensen, Ulrik Deding, Lea Østergaard Hansen, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer","doi":"10.1055/a-2335-8290","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2335-8290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Quality of bowel preparation and successful transit are critical factors for complete small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the impact of chewing gum as part of the bowel preparation regimen on the completion rate in both SBCE and CCE. <b>Methods</b> A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase. Data were extracted upon quality assessment of included studies. Two reviewers conducted the screening process according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Eighty-four studies met the search criteria and four randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, these were assessed for bias using Minors. Pooled completion rate of SBCE studies was defined as the primary outcome. <b>Results</b> Three randomized controlled trials were SBCE studies and one was a CCE study. The pooled completion rate (91%) was not significantly higher in SBCE patients who were given chewing gum after capsule ingestion compared to those who were not (85%). Variance information was not reported in all studies, and therefore, pooled transit time estimates could not be calculated. <b>Conclusions</b> Chewing gum has a good safety profile but has only been used as a booster in one CCE study and a few SBCE studies. More prospective randomized controlled trials, therefore, are needed to investigate the efficacy of chewing gum for achieving complete capsule examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E887-E894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236475/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141579321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of endoscopic surveillance of Lynch syndrome patients in a Swedish cohort. 瑞典队列中林奇综合征患者的内窥镜监测质量。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2339-7152
Sophie Walton Bernstedt, Adrianna Haxhijaj, Nigin Jamizadeh, Jan Björk, Anna Andreasson, Anna M Forsberg, Ann-Sofie Backman

Background and study aims Risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) include sex, age, smoking, high body mass index (BMI), surveillance interval length, and risk genotype. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) produces a standardized bowel cleanliness rating. A low BBPS score might be a risk factor for missed early lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between BBPS score and adenoma detection (with known risk factors for CRC) and surveillance interval with CRC detection in LS patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study including 366 LS patients with 1,887 colonoscopies under surveillance in Stockholm, Sweden from 1989 to 2021 was conducted. Associations were tested using linear and logistic regression. Results We found no association between BBPS score and number of adenomas detected. A low BBPS score was found to be associated with older age (regression coefficient (coeff) -0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.026 to -0.004; P = 0.007) and obesity (coeff = -0.48; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.062; P = 0.024). A higher number of detected adenomas was associated with older age (coeff = 0.008; 95% CI 0.004 to 0.012; P < 0.001), male sex (coeff = 0.097; 95% CI 0.008 to 0.19; P = 0.033) and CRC (coeff = 0.28; 95% CI 0.061 to 0.50; P = 0.012). Surveillance interval length was not significant in CRC detection. Conclusions Bowel cleanliness was not associated with adenoma detection and was less likely achieved in patients who were older and had higher BMI. Adenoma detection was associated with older age and male sex. The results indicate the need for better adherence to guidelines and attention to older age groups, men, and patients with obesity.

背景和研究目的 林奇综合征(Lynch syndrome,LS)患者罹患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险因素包括性别、年龄、吸烟、高体重指数(BMI)、监测间隔时间长短和风险基因型。波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)可对肠道清洁度进行标准化评分。BBPS 评分低可能是漏诊早期病变的一个风险因素。本研究旨在探讨 BBPS 评分与腺瘤检出率(已知的 CRC 风险因素)之间的相关性,以及 LS 患者的监测间隔与 CRC 检出率之间的相关性。方法 该研究进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括 1989 年至 2021 年期间在瑞典斯德哥尔摩接受过 1,887 次结肠镜检查的 366 名 LS 患者。采用线性回归和逻辑回归对相关性进行了检验。结果 我们发现,BBPS评分与检测到的腺瘤数量之间没有关联。BBPS得分低与年龄较大(回归系数 (coeff) -0.015; 95% 置信区间 [CI] -0.026 to -0.004; P = 0.007)和肥胖(系数 = -0.48; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.062; P = 0.024)有关。检测到的腺瘤数量较多与年龄较大(系数 = 0.008;95% CI 0.004 至 0.012;P <0.001)、男性(系数 = 0.097;95% CI 0.008 至 0.19;P = 0.033)和 CRC(系数 = 0.28;95% CI 0.061 至 0.50;P = 0.012)有关。监测间隔时间的长短对 CRC 的检测没有显著影响。结论 肠道清洁度与腺瘤检出率无关,年龄越大、体重指数越高的患者越不容易做到肠道清洁。腺瘤检出率与年龄和性别有关。结果表明,有必要更好地遵守指南,并关注老年群体、男性和肥胖患者。
{"title":"Quality of endoscopic surveillance of Lynch syndrome patients in a Swedish cohort.","authors":"Sophie Walton Bernstedt, Adrianna Haxhijaj, Nigin Jamizadeh, Jan Björk, Anna Andreasson, Anna M Forsberg, Ann-Sofie Backman","doi":"10.1055/a-2339-7152","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2339-7152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) include sex, age, smoking, high body mass index (BMI), surveillance interval length, and risk genotype. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) produces a standardized bowel cleanliness rating. A low BBPS score might be a risk factor for missed early lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between BBPS score and adenoma detection (with known risk factors for CRC) and surveillance interval with CRC detection in LS patients. <b>Methods</b> A retrospective cohort study including 366 LS patients with 1,887 colonoscopies under surveillance in Stockholm, Sweden from 1989 to 2021 was conducted. Associations were tested using linear and logistic regression. <b>Results</b> We found no association between BBPS score and number of adenomas detected. A low BBPS score was found to be associated with older age (regression coefficient (coeff) -0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.026 to -0.004; <i>P</i> = 0.007) and obesity (coeff = -0.48; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.062; <i>P</i> = 0.024). A higher number of detected adenomas was associated with older age (coeff = 0.008; 95% CI 0.004 to 0.012; <i>P</i> < 0.001), male sex (coeff = 0.097; 95% CI 0.008 to 0.19; <i>P</i> = 0.033) and CRC (coeff = 0.28; 95% CI 0.061 to 0.50; <i>P</i> = 0.012). Surveillance interval length was not significant in CRC detection. <b>Conclusions</b> Bowel cleanliness was not associated with adenoma detection and was less likely achieved in patients who were older and had higher BMI. Adenoma detection was associated with older age and male sex. The results indicate the need for better adherence to guidelines and attention to older age groups, men, and patients with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E854-E860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141534023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation. 利用机器学习测量质量,评估结肠镜检查技能:概念验证和初步验证。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-8138
Matthew Wittbrodt, Matthew Klug, Mozziyar Etemadi, Anthony Yang, John E Pandolfino, Rajesh N Keswani

Background and study aims Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). Methods Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed: HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. Results The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( P = 0.99) and WT ( P = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, P = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( P = 0.85) WT time. Conclusions An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.

背景和研究目的 低质量的结肠镜检查会增加患癌风险,但测量质量仍具有挑战性。我们利用机器学习(ML)开发了一种自动、交互式结肠镜检查质量评估(AI-CQ)。方法 根据质量指南,为人工智能开发选择的指标包括插入时间(IT)、退出时间(WT)、息肉检出率(PDR)和每次结肠镜检查的息肉数(PPC)。此外,还开发了两个新的指标:HQ-WT(图像清晰的撤镜时间)和 WT-PT(撤镜时间减去息肉切除时间)。该模型在无标记的结肠镜图像上使用自监督视觉转换器进行预训练,然后在另一个互斥的结肠镜图像数据集上进行微调,以进行多标记分类。除了原始视频外,还通过网络应用程序向临床医生展示了视频预测和度量计算的时间轴。第二家医院使用 50 例结肠镜检查对该模型进行了外部验证。结果 AI-CQ 识别盲肠插管的准确率为 88%。人工测量与 AI-CQ 测量的 IT ( P = 0.99) 和 WT ( P = 0.99) 高度相关,中位差分别为 1.5 秒和 4.5 秒。AI-CQ PDR 与手动 PDR 没有明显差异(47.6% 对 45.5%,P = 0.66)。95.2%的结肠镜检查能正确识别反折,100%的结肠镜检查能正确识别右侧结肠的数量。HQ-WT为45.9%,与WT时间显著相关(P = 0.85)。结论 结肠镜检查技能的交互式人工智能评估可以自动评估质量。我们建议利用该工具快速识别和培训需要补救的医疗服务提供者。
{"title":"Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation.","authors":"Matthew Wittbrodt, Matthew Klug, Mozziyar Etemadi, Anthony Yang, John E Pandolfino, Rajesh N Keswani","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-8138","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2333-8138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). <b>Methods</b> Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed: HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. <b>Results</b> The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( <i>P</i> = 0.99) and WT ( <i>P</i> = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( <i>P</i> = 0.85) WT time. <b>Conclusions</b> An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E849-E853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141534021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy: Risk factors and cost-effectiveness of real-time viewing. 不完整的小肠胶囊内窥镜检查:实时观察的风险因素和成本效益。
IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1055/a-2333-8002
Matilde Topa, Alessandro Rimondi, Andrea Sorge, Veronica Smania, Lucia Scaramella, Nicoletta Nandi, Flaminia Cavallaro, Maurizio Vecchi, Luca Elli, Gian Eugenio Tontini

Background and study aims International guidelines recommend real-time viewing (RTV) in capsule endoscopy for gastric emptying monitoring, yet it is often overlooked in clinical practice. We aimed to assess risk factors for incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and evaluate the clinical relevance and cost-effectiveness of RTV implementation. Methods We included consecutive SBCEs from 2013 to 2020. RTV was not applied per local protocol. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for incomplete SBCE, including prolonged gastric transit time (GTT) and prolonged small bowel transit time (SBTT). Results Analyzing 858 SBCEs, we observed a completion rate of 94.6%. Prolonged GTT and SBTT were present in 4.9% and 18.2% of complete SBCEs, and in 13% ( P =0.03) and 10.8% ( P =0.24) of incomplete SBCEs, respectively. Only 0.7% (6 of 858) had incomplete SBCE with prolonged GTT. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, a modifiable (prolonged GTT odds ratio [OR] 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.5) and two unmodifiable risk factors (inpatient status OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.5) and history of incomplete SBCE (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.3-13.7) were independently linked to higher incomplete SBCE rates. The pretest completion probability was 90.5% and 95.8% in patients with and without unmodifiable risk factors, respectively ( P <0.01). The direct cost of systematic RTV adoption and prokinetics administration would be €5059, aiming to identify and treat each case of prolonged GTT associated with incomplete SBCE. Conclusions Modern devices make incomplete SBCE rare, usually not tied to prolonged GTT. In a low-incidence scenario, widespread RTV use brings high costs and uncertain effectiveness.

背景和研究目的 国际指南推荐在胶囊内镜检查中使用实时观察(RTV)进行胃排空监测,但在临床实践中却经常被忽视。我们旨在评估小肠胶囊内镜检查(SBCE)不完全的风险因素,并评估实施 RTV 的临床相关性和成本效益。方法 我们纳入了 2013 年至 2020 年的连续 SBCE。根据当地协议,未应用 RTV。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定不完全 SBCE 的风险因素,包括胃转运时间(GTT)延长和小肠转运时间(SBTT)延长。结果 通过分析 858 例 SBCE,我们发现完成率为 94.6%。在完整的 SBCE 中,分别有 4.9% 和 18.2% 的患者出现 GTT 和 SBTT 延长;在不完整的 SBCE 中,分别有 13% ( P =0.03) 和 10.8% ( P =0.24) 的患者出现 GTT 和 SBTT 延长。只有 0.7%(858 例中的 6 例)的不完全 SBCE 伴有 GTT 延长。在单变量和多变量分析中,一个可改变的风险因素(GTT延长的几率比[OR] 2.9;95% 置信区间[CI] 1.1-7.5)和两个不可改变的风险因素(住院病人状态 OR 2.3;95% CI 1.1-4.5)以及未完成 SBCE 的病史(OR 4.2;95% CI 1.3-13.7)与较高的未完成 SBCE 率有独立联系。在有和没有不可改变的风险因素的患者中,检测前完成概率分别为 90.5% 和 95.8% (P 结论 现代设备使不完全 SBCE 变得罕见,通常与延长 GTT 无关。在发病率较低的情况下,广泛使用 RTV 会带来高昂的成本和不确定的效果。
{"title":"Incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy: Risk factors and cost-effectiveness of real-time viewing.","authors":"Matilde Topa, Alessandro Rimondi, Andrea Sorge, Veronica Smania, Lucia Scaramella, Nicoletta Nandi, Flaminia Cavallaro, Maurizio Vecchi, Luca Elli, Gian Eugenio Tontini","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-8002","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2333-8002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> International guidelines recommend real-time viewing (RTV) in capsule endoscopy for gastric emptying monitoring, yet it is often overlooked in clinical practice. We aimed to assess risk factors for incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and evaluate the clinical relevance and cost-effectiveness of RTV implementation. <b>Methods</b> We included consecutive SBCEs from 2013 to 2020. RTV was not applied per local protocol. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for incomplete SBCE, including prolonged gastric transit time (GTT) and prolonged small bowel transit time (SBTT). <b>Results</b> Analyzing 858 SBCEs, we observed a completion rate of 94.6%. Prolonged GTT and SBTT were present in 4.9% and 18.2% of complete SBCEs, and in 13% ( <i>P</i> =0.03) and 10.8% ( <i>P</i> =0.24) of incomplete SBCEs, respectively. Only 0.7% (6 of 858) had incomplete SBCE with prolonged GTT. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, a modifiable (prolonged GTT odds ratio [OR] 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.5) and two unmodifiable risk factors (inpatient status OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.5) and history of incomplete SBCE (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.3-13.7) were independently linked to higher incomplete SBCE rates. The pretest completion probability was 90.5% and 95.8% in patients with and without unmodifiable risk factors, respectively ( <i>P</i> <0.01). The direct cost of systematic RTV adoption and prokinetics administration would be €5059, aiming to identify and treat each case of prolonged GTT associated with incomplete SBCE. <b>Conclusions</b> Modern devices make incomplete SBCE rare, usually not tied to prolonged GTT. In a low-incidence scenario, widespread RTV use brings high costs and uncertain effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E842-E848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141534022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Endoscopy International Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1